<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">EPE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Energy and Power Engineering</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1949-243X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/epe.2018.1011030</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">EPE-88578</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Engineering</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  The Physico-Chemical Composition and Energy Recovery Potentials of Municipal Solid Waste Generated in Numan Town, North-Eastern Nigeria
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Alkasim</surname><given-names>Abubakar</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Maigida</surname><given-names>H. Barnabas</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Baba</surname><given-names>M. Tanko</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Physics, Modibbo Adama University of Technology, Yola, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Mechanical Engineering, Federal Polytechnic Mubi, Mubi, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>16</day><month>11</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>475</fpage><lpage>485</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>25,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2018</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>16,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2018</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>19,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2018</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Numan is an urban center in Adamawa State North-Eastern Nigeria. Its waste characteristics are similar to other places in sub-Saharan Africa. In this paper, the physico-chemical characterization of municipal solid waste generated in Numan Town was carried out to estimate the electrical power to be generated from it. The solid waste types were observed to comprise of polythene (27%), organic waste (24.1%), plastic (10.2%), textile (13.2%), paper (9.8%), glass (9.3%) and metals (6.4%). The moisture content as discarded and daily average solid waste generation rate are 16.49% and 0.583 kg/sec respectively. The chemical formula with and without water was determined as C
  <sub>923.28</sub>H
  <sub>1632.60</sub>O
  <sub>258.28</sub>N
  <sub>12.89</sub>S and C
  <sub>923.28</sub>H
  <sub>2099.70</sub>O
  <sub>494.16</sub>N
  <sub>12.89</sub>S respectively. The suitability of the municipal solid waste as a possible source of electrical power was also considered. The energy content of the solid waste on ash free dry-basis was determined as 20861.48 kJ/kg. The estimated power generation per day using incinerating plant at an assumed efficiency of 25% was 3031.5 kW.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Municipal Solid Waste</kwd><kwd> Moisture Content</kwd><kwd> Energy Recovery</kwd><kwd> Power Generation</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The waste in Numan has dramatically accelerated due to population growth, increased income and living standards, which have tremendously caused changes in the quality and quantity of waste generated for the past few decades [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88578-ref1">1</xref>] . Sastry states that “the rate of waste generation is an index of socio-economic development and economic prosperity of the region”. Numan town lacks effective and proper means of collecting and disposing waste. This has resulted in littering of waste on the streets, around the culverts, inside the gutters and other unapproved dump sites. The wastes must be properly handled, stored, collected, processed and disposed to reduce the health risk they will pose to the general public, such as disease outbreak e.g. cholera, typhoid fever and other airborne related diseases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88578-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88578-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88578-ref4">4</xref>] . The increasing volumes of waste being produced would not be a problem if garbage is viewed as resources and managed properly. But despite the heavy volume of waste generated, this place suffers power shortage due to over dependence on power supply from fossil fuel and the use of electric power generators.</p><p>Although the energy needs of man are met by the discovery of fossil fuel deposits, such deposits are limited in quantity. Exploration and production cost to make them commercially available are high. Our energy needs have also grown exponentially, corresponding with human population growth and technological advancement [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88578-ref5">5</xref>] . There is need to explore renewable energy as well as waste to energy so as to reduce over dependence on fossil fuel power generation which produces greenhouse gases and in turn depletes the ozone layer leading to global warming which is gaining greater acceptance in the scientific community. Appropriate utilization of municipal solid waste plays essential role in reducing greenhouse gases, thus reducing the impact on the atmosphere. Energy recovery from Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) can also reduce the amount of fossils fuels utilization. It can also reduce the amount of land needed for MSW disposal and undesirable emission from landfills to air and water [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88578-ref6">6</xref>] . MSW is actually a resource with huge potential in terms of material and energy recovery [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88578-ref7">7</xref>] . Waste to energy is one good option of alternative energy source. Waste-to-energy meets the two basic criteria for establishing what a renewable energy resource is―its fuel source (trash) is sustainable and indigenous [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88578-ref8">8</xref>] . The waste to energy industries has proven itself to be environmentally friendly solution to the disposal of municipal solid waste and the production of energy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88578-ref9">9</xref>] . Combining waste management with waste energy recovery step from municipal solid waste can address the problems of solid waste management and partly the energy crisis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88578-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>The population growth and knowledge has brought high demand on sustainable power that is environmentally friendly. It is in this light that MSW is considered and found to be clean alternative source of power. Proper harnessing of MSW can generate reasonable quantity of electricity that can power communities or even small scale factories. Globally, so much effort is being channeled towards developing processing technologies to release the resource and economic value of residual wastes as population grows and the demand for best sustainable management of waste is needed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88578-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>Most of the literatures reviewed in Nigeria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88578-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88578-ref12">12</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88578-ref13">13</xref>] deals with the Energy recovery from house hold solid wastes only and not the municipal waste. The few that works on the municipal solid wastes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88578-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88578-ref5">5</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88578-ref14">14</xref>] confined their works to their localities while this work extends to Numan a town in North-Eastern Nigeria.</p><p>The uncontrolled influx of people to the urban areas has brought about increase in the demand on electricity and increases the waste dumped in the municipality. This made businesses and socio-economic development of Numan metropolis to suffer many setbacks. Effective utilization of solid waste for energy generation will help curb the menace of environmental pollution and also lessen the effect of the epileptic power supply from the Power Holding Company of Nigeria (PHCN) on socio-economic development. In some cities these power outage lasts for hours leading to loses in the daily routines and productivity. This work examines the energy recovery potentials of the waste streams of Numan municipal area by sorting and preprocessing the combustible components of municipal solid waste and to determine their waste compositions and chemical characteristics. The calorific value of municipal solid waste was evaluated by obtaining the ultimate analysis or the elemental compositions and there after the “as discarded basis method” was used to obtain the energy content.</p>Numan Metropolis<p>Numan town lies on port of the Benue River, Adamawa State, Nigeria. It is located about 30 miles (50 km) from Yola the state capital. The indigenous people are called Bachama. Numan is situated at 9.47˚ N latitude, 12.03˚ E longitude and 137 m elevation above the sea level (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Numan town, have about 77,617 inhabitants as at 2013 population estimate. The estimated waste generated by Numan populace is 50451.05 kg/day based on the 0.65 kg/cap/day based on a research done on Yola by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88578-ref15">15</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methodology</title><p>Most waste materials have residual energy content. The energy value depends on the type of the waste, its moisture content and the calorific value [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88578-ref1">1</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88578-ref6">6</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88578-ref10">10</xref>] . To determine the energy value of MSW certain analytical procedures was followed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Moisture Content</title><p>The percentage moisture of the MSW samples was determined by weighing the samples into a pre weighed dish and drying the samples in an oven at 105˚C to a constant weight for some hours, after which it is cooled and then reweighted [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88578-ref16">16</xref>] . This is done according to American Society of Testing and Material Standard (ASTM). The percentage moisture content (MC) is calculated as a percentage loss in weight before and after drying. Equation (1) defines percentage moisture content.</p><p>%   Moisture   ​   content = ( Wet     Weight   −   Dry   Weight   Wet     Weight ) &#215; 100 % (1)</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Energy Content of MSW on as Discarded Basis</title><p>Individual waste component energy content was used to determine the composite energy content. Some waste items especially package can, bottled and other</p><p>disposables products contain labels that show the typical energy content of each waste components. With the typical energy values of each waste component, the total as-discarded energy value of the MSW was computed as follows [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88578-ref17">17</xref>] .</p><p>The energy content, E<sub>C</sub> is computed as</p><p>E C = Total   Energy   as   discarded 100 (2)</p><p>The energy content on dry basis is calculated using</p><p>E dry = E discard   ( 100 100 −   %   moisture )     kJ / kg (3)</p><p>The energy content on ash-free basis is</p><p>E dry = E discard   ( 100 100 −   %   moisture − %   ash )     kJ / kg (4)</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Energy Content by Ultimate Analysis of MSW</title><p>Solid waste is a mixture of different components which have their own chemical formula. To carry out an ultimate analysis of MSW the chemical formula of the MSW was obtained. After getting the chemical formula of the solid waste, the Dulong’s Formula for estimating energy content of solid waste was then applied on the chemical formula to obtain the heating value of the waste [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88578-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>The chemical formula of solid waste was obtained using the typical fractional elemental composition of solid waste on dry basis shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> and then multiplying the dry mass of each waste component by the typical elemental fractional value.</p><p>From the computed values, the mass of moisture in the waste sample was determined using (5). The calculated moisture content was converted to Hydrogen and Oxygen using (6). Then add the converted masses of the hydrogen and oxygen to their dry masses in the waste sample to calculate the chemical formula with water as (6b) and (6c).</p><p>Moisture     Content = Wet     mass − Dry   mass (5)</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Typical data on ultimate Analysis of Combustible MSW Percent weight (Dry basis) (After Tchobanoglous, et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88578-ref17">17</xref>] )</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Components</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >H</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >O</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >S</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ash</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Plastics</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Paper</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Metals</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Glass</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mixed food</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Textiles</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Polythene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Mass   of   element = molecular   weight   element molecular     weight     water   &#215; mass   of   moisture (6a)</p><p>Total   Mass   of   H = Mass   of   H     in   the   moisture + Mass   of   H   in   dry   sample   (6b)</p><p>Similarly,</p><p>  Total   Mass   of   O = Mass   of   O     in   the   moisture + Mass   of   O     in   dry   sample   (6c)</p><p>The molar composition was determined and there after normalized mole ratio. The chemical formula for the waste sample is deduced for the waste with and without water.</p><p>The Modified Dulong’s formula and the net energy released on combustion, LHV are as stated in (7) and (8) respectively.</p><p>HHV   kJkg − 1 = 337 C   + 1419   ( H 2 − 0.125 O 2 ) +   93 S +   23 N (7)</p><p>LHV = HHV −   ( 2.766   &#215;   W )   kJ ⋅ kg − 1 (8)</p><p>where, W = moisture content, 2.66 kg/g = coefficient of heat requirement for evaporation (Enthalpy of vaporization).</p><p>With the calculated energy content (LHV or NCV) and the total waste generation rate the electrical energy output can be determined from [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88578-ref3">3</xref>] as in (9) and (10),</p><p>Efficiency&#160; η   =   Energy   output     ( E o ) Energy   input     ( E i )   = Electrical&#160;Energy&#160;output Energy&#160;input   &#215; 100   % (9)</p><p>or</p><p>Energy   input   E i   = Mass   flow   rate     ( M f )   &#215;   Calorificvalue   ( LHV ) (10)</p><p>With the assumption that the total waste generated is being burnt in an incinerator plant with efficiency η and a mass flow rate M<sub>f</sub> for the purpose of electric energy generation.</p><p>Combining (9) and (10) we have the electrical energy output, E<sub>o</sub> as</p><p>E o = η &#215; M f &#215; LHV (11)</p><p>where M<sub>f</sub> is</p><p>M f = mass time (12)</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>The study area was divided into divisions/wards so as to have a wide coverage and better representation of the waste streams generated in the entire town. For each division the raw mass of solid waste collected was weighed daily and the result of 30 days average was presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><p>The waste samples were gathered together in one place and then hand sorted into various waste components. Sand, stones, ash were sieved out of the waste. The waste was found to consist of Paper, Plastics, textiles, polythene, mixed organics, Glass and Metals. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> shows the masses of each waste component with their corresponding percentages by mass. Polythene waste was the most</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Average daily waste collected per Division of Numan</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Divisions</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >No of collection points</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Average waste collected (kg)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >% Share of the waste</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Green Village</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.47</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gweda Mallam</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Angwan Mbulawa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.82</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sabon Peggi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Angwan Sarki</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nassarawo Demsa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.93</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Angwan Mission</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.66</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Abuja</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.98</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rafin Sanyi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Computed moisture content and total energy of Numan MSW</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Waste types</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >% Share of the waste by mass</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Wet weight (kg)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Dry weight (kg)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Moisture mass (kg)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Moisture content (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Typical energy kJ/kg (as discarded)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total energy kJ (based on 100 kg sample)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Plastics</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.893</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32,600</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >332,520</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Paper</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.444</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16,750</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >164,150</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Metals</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.390</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >700</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4480</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Glass</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.326</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1395</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Organic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.936</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18,000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >433,800</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Textiles</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.213</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17,450</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >230,340</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Polythene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.229</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32,600</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >880,200</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MC = 16.486</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2,046,885</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Mc = Moisture content.</p><p>abundant, consisting 27% of the total waste sorted. Others are Organic (24.1%), Plastics (10.2%), while Textiles and Paper shared (13.2%) and (9.8%) with Glass 9.3% and Metals 6.4%.</p><p>The moisture content for the wastes calculated using (1) from <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> was shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. The figure indicated that organic matter has the highest (38%) while glass has the least (2%) moisture content. From Equation (1), the Moisture content of the total average daily MSW was 16.485%.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. The Energy Content of the MSW</title><p>Using Equation (2) and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>, the energy content for the “as discarded” MSW is 20468.85 kJ/kg. From the moisture content of 16.486%, the energy content on dry basis was calculated using Equation (3) to be 24510.66 kJ/kg. The energy content for ash free basis assuming ash value of 5% was also determined using (4) as 26071.65 J/kg.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Chemical Composition of the MSW Sample</title><p>With <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> the fractions of the elemental composition of the various waste components collected are computed and the result is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. From <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>, the total mass of moisture in the waste sample collected is 1.52 kg.</p><p>Using (6a) and Moisture Content reported in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>, the converted masses of Hydrogen, H and Oxygen, O are: 0.16889 kg and 1.35111 kg respectively, while the total masses of H and O from 6(b) and 6(c) are: 0.7592 kg and 2.83058 kg respectively.</p><p>The elemental composition of the waste sample was summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Waste composition and elemental fraction values</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Waste Components</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Wet mass (kg)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Dry mass (kg)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >H</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >O</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >S</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ash</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Plastics</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05760</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1824</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Paper</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.33495</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04620</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.33880</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00231</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00154</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04620</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Metals</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02565</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00342</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02451</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00057</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.51585</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Glass</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00420</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00084</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00336</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00084</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.83076</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Organic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.67200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08960</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52640</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03640</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00560</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Textiles</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48480</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06464</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02222</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00202</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03232</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Polythene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.96812</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32802</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00231</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00231</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00924</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.96972</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.59032</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.47947</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06465</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01147</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.58437</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Approximate chemical formula and mole ratio with and without water</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Element</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mass without water (kg)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mass with water (kg)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage by mass (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Molecular mass</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Amount of mole without water</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Amount of mole with water</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mole ratio without water</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mole ratio with water</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.96972</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.96972</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.330535</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.330535</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >923.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >923.28</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >H</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.59032</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75921</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.584475</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.751693</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1632.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2099.70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.47947</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.83058</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.092467</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.176911</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >258.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >494.16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06465</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06465</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.004615</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.004615</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.89</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01147</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01147</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000358</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000358</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>for the waste collected with and without water also, the molar composition and normalized mole ratio were calculated and presented from which the chemical formula for the waste generated was deduced.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. The Combustible Energy Content Estimation</title><p>Using Equation (7) and the data in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>, the calorific value (HHV) of the waste generated was determined for the chemical composition with water to be 20771.44 kJ/kg. Also the LHV (the net energy released on combustion) was obtained using (8) as 20767.23 kJ/kg.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. The Electricity Generation Potentials</title><p>With the net calorific value calculated, the total waste generated flow rate per day and the assumed plant efficiency, the electrical energy content of the waste were estimated. Using Equation (12) the mass flow rate was 0.5839 kg/s. The electrical energy recovery potential from the municipal solid waste as stated in (11), at an assumed overall operating efficiency of 25%, was 3031.50 kJ/s (3.0315 MW). The simulation carried out for different overall efficiencies of the incinerating plant ranging from 15% to 55% at the mass flow rate of 0.5839 kg/s and heating value of 20767.23 kJ/kg, reveals a corresponding electrical output of 1818.9 kW to 6669.29 kW respectively based on Equation (11).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>This research work revealed that the waste compositions in the study area are heterogeneous. The mixed waste is found to consist of Paper, Plastics, Textiles, Polythene, Mixed organics, Glass and Metals after it is being sorted. In Numan, Polythene waste was the most abundant (27%) followed by Organic (24.1%), Plastics (10.2%), Textiles (13.2%) and Paper (9.8%), Glass (9.3%) and Metals (6.4%).</p><p>Numan MSW having percentage moisture content of 16.49% indicates that the waste generated can burn easily with high heating value and can be used as a fuel for thermochemical conversion (incineration, pyrolysis or gasification) plant that is technically viable for energy recovery since both values of percentage moisture content fall within the specified range.</p><p>The empirical chemical formula for the waste generated in Numan MSW was defined as follows</p><p>C<sub>923.28</sub>H<sub>1632.60</sub>O<sub>258.28</sub>N<sub>12.89</sub>S without water</p><p>C<sub>923.28</sub>H<sub>2099.70</sub>O<sub>494.16</sub>N<sub>12.89</sub>S with water</p><p>The LHV of 20767.23 kJ/kg calculated in this study is well above the minimum value. Therefore, the MSW of the study area can be used as a fuel for incineration and for electricity generation. The research also reveals that the energy content value on ash-free dry basis is 20861.48 kJ/kg. The estimated net power generation per day at an assumed efficiency of 25% for an incinerating plant is 3031.50 kW. The electrical energy expected ranges between 1400.76 kW and 5136.13 kW. Hence, the electricity potential due to the Numan Municipal solid waste is significant. Therefore, the MSW available has residual or potential energy content that is good enough to be converted to heat or electrical energy via energy recovery processes (an incinerating plant).</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Abubakar, A., Barnabas, M.H. and Tanko, B.M. (2018) The Physico-Chemical Composition and Energy Recovery Potentials of Municipal Solid Waste Generated in Numan Town, North-Eastern Nigeria. Energy and Power Engineering, 10, 475-485. https://doi.org/10.4236/epe.2018.1011030</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.88578-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sastry, D.B.S.S.R. (2015) Composition of Municipal Solid Waste-Need for Thermal Treatment in Present Indian Context.  
http://www.seas.columbia.edu/earth/wtert/sofos/DBSSRS_Article_-_WTE_INDIA_BRIEF_Revised.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88578-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kadafa, A.A., Latifah, A.M., Abdullah, H.S. and Sulaiman, W.N.A. (2013) Current Status of Municipal Solid Waste Management Practise in FCT Abuja. Research Journal of Environmental and Earth Sciences, 5, 295-304.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88578-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yusuff, A.S., John, W., Okoro, O. and Ajibade, A. (2014) Physio-Chemical Composition and Energy Content Analysis of Solid Waste: A Case Study of Castlereagh District, Northern Ireland. American Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, 2, 1-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88578-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Linda, S., Mehdi, K. and Lylia, B. (2013) Assessment of Different Methods of Treatment for an Integrated Municipal Waste Management for Algerian City. Management of Environmental Quality: An international Journal, 25, 493-504.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88578-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ujam, A.J. and Eboh, F. (2012) Thermal Analysis of Small-Scale Municipal Solid Waste-Fired Steam Generator: A Case Study of Enugu State, Nigeria. Journal of Energy Technologies and policy, 2, 38-49.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88578-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Themelis, N.J., Kim, Y.H. and Brady, M.H. (2002) Energy Recovery from New York City Solid Waste. ISWA Journal: Waste Management and Research, 20, 223-233.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88578-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hassan, A.A., Kenan, J. and Amimul, A. (2015) Environmental Performance and Energy Recovery Potential of Five Processes for Municipal Solid Waste Treatment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 105, 233-240.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88578-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ted, M. (2010) The 2010 ERC Directory of Waste-to-Energy Plants.  
http://energyrecoverycouncil.org/userfiles/file/ERC_2010_Directory.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88578-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kumar, J.S., Subbaiah, K.V. and Prasada, R.P.V.V. (2010) Waste to Energy—A Case Study of Eluru City, Andhra Pradesh. International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 1, 151-162.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88578-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arthur, O., Mahir, S., Karoli, N., Geoffrey, J. and Peter, M. (2014) Energy Recovery Routes from Municipal Solid Waste, a Case Study of Arusha-Tanzania. Journal of Energy Technologies and Policy, 4, 1-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88578-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kuleape, R., Cobbina, S.J., Dampare, S.B., Duwiejuah, A.B., Amoako, E.E. and Asare, W. (2014) Assessment of the Energy Recovery Potentials of Solid Waste Generated in Akosombo, Ghana. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 8, 297-305. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJEST2014.1663</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88578-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Muhammad, T.B., Alkasim, A. and Muhammad, B.A. (2014) Estimation of Moisture Content of Household Solid Waste in Some Selected Areas of Jimeta Town. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 5, 430-433.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88578-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ogwueleka</surname><given-names> T.C. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2009</year>)<article-title>Municipal Solid Waste Characteristics and Management in Nigeria</article-title><source> Iranian Journal of Environment and Health Science Engineering</source><volume> 6</volume>,<fpage> 173</fpage>-<lpage>180</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88578-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zainab, A.B. and Hijab, M. (2013) Survey of Municipal Solid Waste in Jimeta-Yola, Northeastern Nigeria. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 4, 1-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88578-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ethiopian Public Health Training Initiative EPHTI (2004) Lecture Notes on Solid Waste Management.  
https://www.cartercenter.org/resources/pdfs/health/ephti/library/lecture_notes</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88578-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Obid, T., Jan, D. and Wojciech, N. (2015) Catalytic Energy Production from Municipal Solid Waste Biomass: Case Study in Perlis-Malaysia. World Journal of Environmental Engineering, 3, 7-14.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88578-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tchobanoglous, G., Theiman, H. and Eliassen, R. (1977) Solid Wastes Engineering Principles and Management Issues. McGraw-Hill, New York.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>