<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2018.912173</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-88379</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  The Seed Water Sorption Isotherm and Antioxidant-Defensive Mechanisms of &lt;i&gt;Hordeum vulgare&lt;/i&gt; L. Primed Seeds
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Pinpinatt</surname><given-names>Junhaeng</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Pitipong</surname><given-names>Thobunluepop</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wanchai</surname><given-names>Chanprasert</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Damrongvudhi</surname><given-names>Onwimol</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sutkhet</surname><given-names>Nakasathien</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Elke</surname><given-names>Pawelzik</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Division of Quality of Plant Products, Department of Crop Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Georg-August-Universit&amp;amp;auml;t G&amp;amp;ouml;ttingen, G&amp;amp;ouml;ttingen, Germany</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>02</day><month>11</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>2385</fpage><lpage>2407</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>26,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2018</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>6,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2018</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>9,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2018</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The key successful for seed priming technique was the management of seed imbibition process. This study was aimed to indicate the seed moisture sorption characteristics of 
  &lt;i&gt;
  Hordeum vulgare
  &lt;/i&gt;
   L. cv.
   
  Samerng 2 in relation to the seed priming technique and its effect on the seed qualities. The experiment
   
  was designed by Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with four replications. Seed hydro-priming technique was done under 25 degree Celsius, and 40%
   
  -
   
  60%
   
  RH. Barley seed moisture content was determined every hour after imbibition for 24 hours. Then, primed barley seed qualities were evaluated at 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16 hours of hydrotime. The results revealed that barley seeds
   were 
  imbibed rapidly from 10.55% to 37.69% seed moisture content during 0 - 9 hours of imbibition. The constantly seed moisture content was continued until 17 hours of imbibition. Radicle was protruded with 42.74% seed moisture content. Seed moisture sorption characteristic equation was
   &lt;i&gt;Y&lt;/i&gt; = 0.0055x<sup>3</sup>
  - 0.267x<sup>2</sup> + 4.5931x + 13.348
  . Coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) was 0.916. Primed seed germination was not affected by hydrotime. Primed seeds were improved in speed of germination and seedling growth rate. The best primed barley seed vigorous w
  as
   noted at 14 - 16 hours of hydrotime. In addition, catalase activity (CAT) and superoxide dismutase activity (SOD) were not significantly different for non-primed and 14 
  -
   16 hours primed seeds. However, lipoxygenase activity (LOX) was increased and malondialdehyde (MDA) content was decreased for 14 - 16 hours primed seeds. Subsequently, 14 
  -
   16 hours primed barley seeds can maintain high seed germination and vigor for 8
   
  -
   
  12 months under 5 degree Celsius. Thus, it could be concluded that hydro-priming for 14 
  -
   16 hours enhance
  s
   barley seed quality by reducing germination time, induced defenses mechanism, and could be stored for 8
   
  -
   
  12 months.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Seed Moisture Sorption Characteristic</kwd><kwd> Barley Seed</kwd><kwd> Hydro-Priming</kwd><kwd> Seed Germination</kwd><kwd> Speed of Germination</kwd><kwd> Storability</kwd><kwd> Defenses Mechanism</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) seeds were used as raw material of malt production for food and beverage industry. The fast and uniformity of barley seed germination was expected for malt production standard. The requirement of malt industry was high seed qualities which could be germinated well with high seedling vigor. Those seeds were able to ensure uniform of germination, which was able to increase malt productivity. However, low seed germination, low seed vigor especially microorganisms contamination was commonly found in Thai’s grown barley seed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref3">3</xref>] . Those reports were recognized that barley seed germination was found lower than 75% and contaminated with more than 70% of pathogen. This problem might cause 30% - 40% of losing in malting production efficiency.</p><p>Many techniques were used to improve barley seed germination and vigor. Seed priming was one of the most effective techniques that would improve germination and crop establishment of several crops such as barley under phosphorus and zinc deficiency conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref4">4</xref>] , wheat [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref6">6</xref>] , safflower under salt stress [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref7">7</xref>] , and Aeluropus Macrostachys [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref8">8</xref>] . The technique was controlled seed imbibition process to allow metabolic activation occurring and prevented completion of germination. The seeds would be brought in the stoppable but irreversible germination [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref9">9</xref>] . Bewley et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref10">10</xref>] have published that several factors govern the movement of water into the seed, but particularly important was the water relations between seed and ambient environment.</p><p>A mature dry seed imbibition characteristic was triphasic. A rapid initial uptake of water was called “Imbibition Phase” or Phase I, then, followed by a plateau phase which was called “Activation Phase” or Phase II. Further, the increasing of water uptake occurred after germination completed as the embryonic axis elongated. This phase was called “Growth Phase” or Phase III [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref10">10</xref>] . Water is well known as the most important physiological factor for seed germination. The measurement of water status or water available for germinating seed was necessary to describe the status of water in seeds. Water potential (Ψ) is a measure of the energy status of water per unit volume relative to pure water as reference. It measures the availability of water to participate in chemical and physiological mechanisms. It is generally expressed as pressure units, megaPascal (MPa), by −1 MPa = −10 bar [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref10">10</xref>] . Pure water has the highest potential, which assigned a zero value. Dry seeds usually had water potentials (Ѱ) between −350 MPa and −50 MPa. Water molecules flow through seeds pores from high water potential sites to low water potential sites to reach equilibrium water potential within seed environments over time [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref10">10</xref>] . Therefore, the huge different between Ψ in dry seed tissue and ambient Ψ resulted in rapid water influx from outside to dry sites during imbibition (Phase I) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref11">11</xref>] . The total water potential is the sum of three components as showed in Equation (1).</p><p>Ψ c e l l = Ψ s + Ψ p + Ψ m (1)</p><p>where, Ѱ<sub>s</sub> = solute or osmotic potential</p><p>Ѱ<sub>p</sub> = turgor potential</p><p>Ѱ<sub>m</sub> = matric potential</p><p>The water potential of seeds in seed priming technique was controlled by controlling either matric potential or osmotic potential of seed environment. The events suddenly dry seed was brought into contact with water, there was a very large of water potential for the rapid movement of water into the seed. Water was entered through the micropyle [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref12">12</xref>] . Water would diffuse into seed rapidly in response to the low matric potential of the dry seed. Then, after seeds start to take up water, there was often leakage of solutes such as sugar, organic acids, ions, amino acids, and proteins into the surrounding medium. The phospholipid components in cell wall membrane were achieved from the gel phase during maturation drying to the normal hydrated liquid-crystalline state [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref13">13</xref>] . Then, in a short time of rehydration, the membranes return to their more stable configuration at which time solute leakage was curtailed. Then, seed was entered to plateau phase (Phase II) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref12">12</xref>] . The breakdown of cell walls and converting food reserves to mobile substances (Modification process), was occurred continually until the radicle protruded (Phase III).</p><p>Furthermore, primed seed qualities were needed to evaluate. Several researchers reported on primed seed quality. Bradford and Bewley [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref14">14</xref>] reported that primed seeds were increased in speed of germination, improved germination uniformity, improved seedling establishment, reduced time to fifty percentage germination, and pronoun with low germination seed lot. However, primed seeds were reduced in seed storability and needed low storage temperature. Zheng et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref15">15</xref>] reported that canola primed seed had improved germination and reduced germination time. Sharma et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref16">16</xref>] also reported that priming okra cv. Hisar Unnat seeds by 12 hours of hydrotime had affected on increasing germination rate, seedling vigor, mean emergence time, and yield. Kazem et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref17">17</xref>] reported that primed seeds of pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cv. Talash, COS<sub>16</sub>, and Khomain, by 7 and 14 hours of hydrotime resulted in lower mean emergence time and higher seedling emergence percentage when compared with non-primed seeds. Naceur [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref18">18</xref>] studied on the effects of hydro-priming on wheat (Triticum durum) and barley (Hordeum vulgare) seeds. The results found that the seeds adsorbed water rapidly till 9.5 hours of hydrotime at 25˚C and 35˚C in the dark. The results of primed seed by 5.5 - 6.5 hours (late of Phase I) of hydrotime found that speed of radicle emergence, coleoptile and side roots emergence and seedling fresh weight were improved more than non-primed seeds, especially under 25˚C. Additionally, Ibrahim et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref19">19</xref>] reported on upland rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. NERICA 2) seeds that had significantly affect (p &lt; 0.05) of hydro-priming on plant growth parameters. The successful was hydro-priming technique with 12 hours of hydrotime. The upland rice was greater in seedling establishment and growth performance in Sokoto, under Nigeria climatic conditions.</p><p>However, it has been no report in the effects of priming technique on barley seed (Hordeum vulgare L.) qualities which applied for malt industry, including barley seed moisture sorption characteristics as well as seed qualities. Thus, this study was aimed to indicate the seed moisture sorption characteristics of Hordeum vulgare L. cv. Samerng 2 in relation to the seed priming technique and its effect on the seed qualities.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>Seed materials:</p><p>Barley seeds (Hordeum vulgare L. cv. Samerng 2) were cultivated on November 2012 to February 2013 in the area of Samerng Rice Research Center, Chiangmai, Thailand. The seeds were 10.55% of initial seed moisture content and 91% of germination. Seeds were processed and graded before used in this experiment.</p><p>The experimental design:</p><p>The experiment was conducted in Complete Randomized design (CRD) with four replications. The experimental treatment was imbibition time which was conducted in 6 levels; 6 hours, 8 hours, 10 hours, 12 hours, 14 hours, and 16 hours. Barley seeds were primed at room temperature (25˚C). An aeration pump was added during the experiment to provide oxygen. Then, the barley seeds were dried in a fan-forced oven at 32˚C for 48 - 72 hours to obtain required seed moisture content of 9% - 10%. Finally, primed seed was sampling for seed qualities test.</p><p>Barley seed moisture sorption characteristics:</p><p>Barley seeds were primed in distilled water under room temperature (25˚C). An aeration pump was used throughout 24 hours of the experiment. Primed seed was sampling to measure seed moisture content every hour by hot air oven method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref20">20</xref>] .</p><p>The primed seed moisture content values were plotted versus imbibition time. The curve and equation was fitted by best-of-fit method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref21">21</xref>] . The coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) was represented the best fit by high value. The type of curve that could be fitted was often suggested by theoretical considerations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref21">21</xref>] .</p><p>Seed quality evaluation:</p><p>Seed moisture content, (smc)</p><p>Seed moisture content was measured by the hot air-oven method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref20">20</xref>] . 5 g of seed were dried by a hot air oven at 130˚C for 2 hours. Then, the samples were transferred to desiccator for cooling down. The samples were then weighed and finally the percentage of seed moisture content was calculated and expressed based on a wet basis (wb) as following Equation (2):</p><p>% seed moisture content = fresh weight − dry weight fresh weight &#215; 100 (2)</p><p>Seed germination percentage (Germ)</p><p>The percentage of seed germination was determined by between papers (BP) method, according to the standard germination test [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref20">20</xref>] . 100 seeds were placed between papers for four replications. Then, seeds were incubated in a germination chamber at 20˚C for 3 days as final count according to malt quality criteria. The results were calculated as the average of four replicates of 100 seeds, and expressed as a percentage of normal seedlings.</p><p>Seed germination index (GI)</p><p>The seed germination percentage was done following ISTA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref20">20</xref>] . The number of germinated seeds was counted every day for three days and the germination index was calculated following Equation (3);</p><p>Germination index ( GI ) = n 1 1 + n 2 2 + n 3 3 (3)</p><p>where n1, n2, n3: were the number of seed germinated on day 1 to day 3 and 1, 2, 3: were the number of days.</p><p>Seedling growth rate (SGR)</p><p>Standard seed germination test was incubated in dark condition for 7 days. Then, endosperm was removed from germinated seeds. Finally, shoot and root were taken for dry weight in hot air oven for 80 degree Celsius for 24 hours. Seedling growth rate was calculated according to ISTA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref20">20</xref>] as following Equation (4);</p><p>Seedling growth rate ( SGR ) = shoot and root dry weight number of germinated seed (4)</p><p>Mean emergence time (MET)</p><p>Mean emergence time was done by following Demir et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref22">22</xref>] . Standard germination was done by following ISTA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref20">20</xref>] . Then, number of germinated seeds were counted every day and the mean emergence time (MET) was calculated as following Equation (5);</p><p>MET = ∑ ​   n ⋅ D ∑ ​   n (5)</p><p>where n = number of seeds newly germinated at time D;</p><p>D = days from the beginning of the germination test;</p><p>Σn = final germination.</p><p>Time to fifty percentage germination (T<sub>50</sub>)</p><p>400 seeds of four replications were sampling and placed between papers. The number of germinated seeds were counted before fifty percentage germination and every day for 7 days after sowing. T<sub>50</sub> was calculated according to Coolbear et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref23">23</xref>] as Equation (6):</p><p>T 50 = t i + [ [ { ( N + 1 ) / 2 } − n i ] / ( n j − n i ) ] &#215; ( t j − t i ) (6)</p><p>where, t<sub>i</sub> = time before fifty percentage germination</p><p>n<sub>i</sub> = number of germinated seeds at t<sub>i</sub></p><p>N = number of total germinated seed</p><p>t<sub>j</sub> = time next to t<sub>i</sub></p><p>n<sub>j</sub> = number of germinated seeds at t<sub>j</sub></p><p>The electrical conductivity test (Cond)</p><p>The electrical conductivity test was used to determine seed membrane integrity by measuring the seed leakage. This test followed procedures described by ISTA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref20">20</xref>] . First, 100 seeds were weighted and soaked into de-ionized water. Then, they were placed at 25˚C for 24 hours. Finally, the solution was determined for electrical conductivity by the conductivity meter (Sartorius, model PP-20). The electrical conductivity unit was &#181;S cm<sup>−1</sup> g<sup>−1</sup>).</p><p>Seed biochemical evaluation:</p><p>The best selections of imbibition time were evaluated for seed biochemical properties including protein content, carbohydrate content, lipid content, catalase activity, α-amylase activity, soluble sugars content, superoxide dismutase activity (SOD), total free fatty acid (TFA), malonaldehyde (MDA), and lipoxygenase activity (LOX).</p><p>Determination of protein content</p><p>Elemental analyses of total nitrogen and carbon (and sulphur) were performed to provide carbonate and organic carbon. The total nitrogen, carbon, and sulphur were determined using a CHNS/O Analyser, model LECO CHNS-932 and VTF-900. Freeze-dried barley seeds were ground (UDY, Cyclone Sample Mill No.2). The samples were weighed 125 mg and mixed with an oxidizer (vanadium pentoxide [V<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>]) in a tin capsule, which was then combusted in a reactor at 1000˚C. The sample and container melt, and the tin promote a violent reaction in a temporarily enriched oxygen atmosphere. The combustion products CO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub>, and NO<sub>2</sub> were carried by a constant flow of carrier gas (helium) that passes through a glass column packed with an oxidation catalyst of tungsten trioxide (WO<sub>3</sub>) and a copper reducer, both kept at 1000˚C. At this temperature, the nitrogen oxide was reduced to N<sub>2</sub>. The N<sub>2</sub>, CO<sub>2</sub>, and SO<sub>2</sub> were then transported by the helium to, and separated by, a 2-m-long packed column and quantified with a TCD (set at 290˚C).</p><p>The chromatographic responses were calibrated against pre-analysed standards, and the CHNS elemental contents were reported in weight percent. 628 series software was used for running the equipment, storing the data, and for postrun analysis.</p><p>The protein content of the sample was obtained from the multiplying the nitrogen determined by 6.25 as Equation (7):</p><p>Total protein content ( g   100   g − 1   DM ) = Total nitrogen content &#215; 6.25 (7)</p><p>Determination of carbohydrate content</p><p>The carbohydrate content of the samples was measured and modified according to &#197;man et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref24">24</xref>] . 30 mg of barley starch were dissolved in 15 mL of 80% ethanol in order to rupture granules. The screw cap tubes were placed in a boiling water bath in order to dissolve and extract low molecular weight carbohydrates. Then, cooling to room temperature. Then, the samples were centrifuged at 830 rpm per 10 min and the pellet formed was washed twice with 15 mL of 80% ethanol. Finally, the test tubes were emptied carefully and inverted for 5 minutes. Samples were incubated with thermostable α-amylase (50 μL in 25 mL acetate buffer) in a boiling water bath for 30 minutes. Tubes were shaken three times during incubation and observed regarding adhering material, lumps and tight capping. Then, samples were cooled to a temperature of 40˚C before a total degradation to glucose units was assured by treatment with amyloglucosidase (100 μL in 0.1 M acetate buffer, 140 U/mL) in a shaking water bath at 60˚C overnight. Samples were cooled to room temperature and centrifuged at 830 rpm for 10 minutes. The supernatant was diluted in water to 1:25 and 1.00 mL aliquots were mixed with 3.00 mL GOPOD and placed in a 50˚C water bath for 20 min where after absorbance was measured at 510 nm using spectrophotometer. The glucose concentration was determined from a standard curve and the carbohydrate content was calculated according to the equation following;</p><p>% carbohydrate ( DM ) = ( [ glucose ] ( mg / mL ) &#215; 25.15 &#215; 0.9 &#215; 25 ) / sample weight ( DM , mg )</p><p>where, 25.15 = total volume of solution in mL</p><p>0.9 = the factor for conversion of free glucose to a glucopyranosyl unit of starch</p><p>25 = the dilution factor</p><p>Determination of total lipid and free fatty acid (FFA) content</p><p>According to Lam and Proctor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref25">25</xref>] , the gravimetric method was used to determine the total lipid content. Lipid content was extracted by vortexing 10 g of barley sample with 4 ml of isopropanol for 5 min. Then, added 5 ml of isopropanol into the sample and vortexes for 5 min. After that the extract was centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 10 min. The weight of extracted lipids was determined after evaporating the solvent on an electric hot plate at 40˚C.</p><p>According to Walde and Nastruzzi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref26">26</xref>] , FFA of the sample was determined by preparing an assay solution, which contained 0.375 ml of solution A (0.1 M tris/HCl; pH 9.0), 0.125 ml of solution B (2 mM phenol red in 0.1 M tris/HCl; pH 9.0), and 0.5 ml of solution C (50 mM Bis (2-ethylhexyl) sodium sulfosuccinate in isooctane). Then, 30 &#181;L of isopropanol extract was mixed with 1 ml of assay solution in a 1-cm wide cuvette and was shaken for one minute before measuring absorbance at 560 nm. FFA of each extract was obtained from a calibration curve. The calibration curve was prepared by dissolving oleic acid in isopropanol to produce oleic acid solution of 0.001% to 0.02% (w/w).</p><p>Determination of catalase activity</p><p>According to Aebi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref27">27</xref>] , purified catalase was incubated with methanol and hydrogen peroxide in 250 mM KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sup>4−</sup>NaOH buffer, pH7.0. By the standard procedure, 50 &#181;l buffer, 50 &#181;l 100% (w/v) methanol, giving a final concentration of 5.9 M, and 10 &#181;l 0.27% (w/v) hydrogen peroxide, giving a final concentration of 4.2 mM, were mixed in small polystyrene test tubes. The enzymatic reaction was initiated by addition of 100 &#181;l of a catalase-containing sample. For evaluation of methodological details, the sample consisted of 0.125 - 2.0 &#181;g/ml purified catalase from barley milled, with an activity of 2500 units/mg, dissolved in 25 mM KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sup>4−</sup>NaOH buffer, pH 7.0. Pure buffer was used as blanks. The reaction mixture was incubated with continuous shaking for exactly 20 min at room temperature (25˚C). The enzymatic reaction was terminated by addition of 50 &#181;l 7.8 M potassium hydroxide solution to each tube. Immediately thereafter the tubes were supplied with 100 &#181;l each of 34.2 mM Purpald in 480 mM hydrochloric acid, and a second incubation with continuous shaking was performed for 10 min at 20˚C. To obtain a colored compound, the product of the reaction between formaldehyde and Purpald was oxidized by adding 50 &#181;l 65.2 mM potassium periodate in 470 mM potassium hydroxide to each tube. Any particulate material in the tubes was pedimented by centrifugation at 9500 g for 10 min, and using glass standard microcuvettes of 2-mm width and 10-mm light path, the absorbance of the clear liquid was measure at 550 nm.</p><p>Determination of α-amylase activity</p><p>The α-amylase activity of an enzyme extract was determined at 30˚C by kinetic measurement of its reaction with a standard limit dextrin substrate made from Lintner starch [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref28">28</xref>] . Grind the barley seeds sample to pass through a 0.8 mm sieve, and then blend thoroughly.</p><p>Preparation of enzyme extract: 5 g of barley flour with 100 ml calcium chloride solution for 1 hr at 30˚C. Mix sample and liquid thoroughly in the mixing flask by shaking 10 times. After mixing, immediately flasks was immersed in a water bath at 30˚C for 15, 30, and 45 min, then takes out each sample from the water bath, and turn upside down exactly 10 times, and reimmerse. 60 min after extraction the sample was taken out immediately without shaking and decant into centrifuge tube. Centifuge the suspension for 10 min at 2000 - 3000 rpm without let the sample to stand in the mixing tube. The Whatman no. 42 filter paper was used.</p><p>Adjustment of colorimeter: mix 2 ml calcium chloride solution with 10 ml dilutes iodine solution. Dilute with 40 ml distilled water and attempter to 20˚C. With this mixture adjust the extinction at 20˚C to the value 0 on the colorimeter at 575 nm.</p><p>Substrate control: mix 1 part of limit dextrin substrate with 3 parts of 0.2% calcium chloride solution. Mix 2 ml of this solution with 10 ml dilutes iodine solution and dilute with 40 ml distilled water. The extinction reading at 20˚C should be 0.55 - 0.60.</p><p>Determination of α-amylase activity: attempter the standard substrate to 30˚C. Transfer 15 ml of the clear enzyme extract into a test tube and place in 30˚C baths. After 5 - 10 min, when the extract has attained a temperature of 30˚C, added 5 ml of the standard substrate, using a rapid-flow pipet, and shake the mixture vigorously. Simultaneously with pipetting of the substrate into the extract, start a stop watch. At intervals of 5 or 10 min take the following actions. (a) Pipet 2 ml volume of this solution into 10 ml iodine solution prediluted with 40 ml distilled water, (b) attempter to 20˚C, (c) read the extinction on the colorimeter.</p><p>The method of calculation and formulas used: α-amylase activity (A) was expressed as a function of α-amylase concentration and of the velocity constant for the hydrolytic degradation of limit dextrin. Calculated the activity using equation:</p><p>A = 500 k c / f</p><p>where, A = α-amylase activity</p><p>500 = factor to obtain more practicable values</p><p>k = velocity constant for hydrolytic degradation of limit dextrin</p><p>c = concentration of enzyme extract: normally c = 5</p><p>f = dilution factor</p><p>Determination of sugar content</p><p>Sugar content was determined by iodine titration of excess copper of Luff-Schoorl method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref29">29</xref>] . Sample solution preparation: 5 g of ground sample was accurately weighed to nearest 1 mg and transferred to a 250 ml-volumetric flask, which contained 200 ml distilled water. Five millilitres of Carrez solution I, (21.795 g of zinc acetate dehydrate (Zn(CH<sub>3</sub>COO)<sub>2</sub>∙2H<sub>2</sub>O) and 3 ml of glacial acetic acid were dissolved and made up to 100 ml with distilled water) and 5 ml of Carrez solution II, (10.76 g of potassium hexacyanoferrate II trihydrate (K<sub>4</sub> [Fe(CN)<sub>6</sub>]∙3H<sub>2</sub>O) in water and make up to 100 ml with water), were mixed after each addition and made up to 250 ml with water and mix well.</p><p>Luff-Schoorl reagent preparation: citric acid solution (50 g of citric acid dehydrate (C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>8</sub>O<sub>7</sub>2H<sub>2</sub>O) in 50 ml of water) was added to sodium carbonate solution (143.78 g of anhydrous sodium carbonate in 300 ml of warm water and allow to cool) in a one-liter volumetric flask with gentle swirling. Then, copper II sulphate pentahydrate solution (25 g of CuSO<sub>4</sub>∙5H<sub>2</sub>O in 100 ml of water) was added and made up to 1000 ml with water. The solution was allowed to stand overnight and the filtered.</p><p>Twenty-five milliliters of Luff-Schoorl reagent and 25 ml of sample solution were transferred into 250 conical flasks and extracted at 80˚C in ultrasonic bath (Bandelin, Germany) for 10 min. After that, the sample was immediately cooled for 5 min. Then, 10 ml of 30% (w/v) potassium iodide solution were added, and immediately followed by 25 ml of 3 M sulphuric acid adding. Titration was done with 0.71 M sodium thiosulphate solution until the solution was almost colorless, then added a few milliliters of starch indicator (5 g of soluble starch; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) slurred in 30 ml of water, boil for 3 min, allowed the mixture to cool and added water to make the 1 L solution). The titration was continued until the blue color disappears.</p><p>Finally, sugar content was calculated from the standard table by using the weight of glucose or the weight of invert sugar in percentage corresponding to the difference between the two-titration readings, expressed in milliliters of 0.71 M sodium thiosulphate. Express the results in terms of invert sugar or D-glucose as percentage of the dry matter.</p><p>Determination of amylose content</p><p>Amylose content was analyzed using the method described by Juliano et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref30">30</xref>] . In brief, barley powder (100 g) was mixed with 1 ml of 95% ethanol and 9 ml of 1 M NaOH in a 100 ml beaker and left overnight. On the subsequent day, distilled water was added to the mixture to make up the final volume to 100 ml. A sample of 5 ml of the mixed solution was measured into a volumetric flask, 1 ml of 1 M acetic acid and 2 ml iodine solution were added into the solution and the volume made up to 100 ml with distilled water. The samples were then stirred and allowed to stand for 20 min before absorbance was measured at 620 nm with a UV-Spectrophotometer. The amylose content of the barley samples were calculated based on the method described by McGrance et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref31">31</xref>] using a standard curve plotted from absorbance of amylose standards. Amylopectin content of the barley samples was calculated by the difference based on Juan et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref32">32</xref>] using the following equation;</p><p>Amylopectin ( % ) = 100 % − amylose (%)</p><p>Determination of superoxide dismutase activity (SOD)</p><p>The method of Oberley and Spitz [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref33">33</xref>] , with some modification was used to determine the activity of SOD. One millilitre of reaction mixture for the determination of SOD activity contained 800 &#181;L of reaction mixture (0.1 mM Xanthine, 0.056 mM NBT, 1.0 mM DETAPAC, and 1 U CAT in 0.05 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.8)), 100 &#181;L of enzyme extracted, and 100 &#181;L of 0.1 U/ml xanthine oxidase. SOD was evaluated by measuring the ability of the enzyme extract to inhibit the photochemical reduction of nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT). The reaction was initiated by illuminating the reaction mixtures at 26˚C - 28˚C for 30 min and absorbances was read at 590 nm. One unit of SOD was defined as the enzyme activity that inhibited photoreaction of NBT to blue formation by 50%. SOD activity of the extracts was expressed as ∆ activity mg<sup>−1</sup> protein.</p><p>Determination of malonaldehyde content (MDA)</p><p>Barley seeds were stored at −80˚C until used for assays. Before the extraction, samples were first ground into fine powder with liquid nitrogen.</p><p>Malonaldehyde (MDA) content of seeds was measured according to Dhindsa et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref34">34</xref>] and Shi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref35">35</xref>] . 0.1 g of ground seed was mixed with 1.5 ml of 10% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and then centrifuged at 10,000&#215;g for 15 min. Supernatant (350 &#181;l) was mixed with 350 &#181;l of 0.6% (w/v) thiobarbituric acid. The mixture was heated at 95˚C for 30 min and then quickly cooled on ice for 5 min. After centrifugation at 10,000 &#215;g for 10 min at 4˚C. The absorbance of the reaction mixture was measured at 450, 532 and 600 nm. The MDA concentration (&#181;M) was calculated according to the formula below:</p><p>[ MDA ] = 6.45 &#215; ( A 532 − A 600 ) − 0.56 &#215; A 450</p><p>where A<sub>532</sub>, A<sub>600</sub>, and A<sub>450</sub> represent the absorbance of the mixture at 450, 532, and 600 nm, respectively.</p><p>Determination of lipoxygenase activity (LOX)</p><p>Enzyme extraction: 3.0 g of barley powder were homogenized with 5 ml of extraction buffer (0.05 M sodium borate buffer, pH 9.0) and shaken for 30 s. The mixture was centrifuge at 12,000 rpm at 26˚C - 28˚C for 5 mins. For LOX assay, 5 ml of 96% (v/v) ethanol were added and incubated at 26˚C - 28˚C for 15 s, then filtered. Afterwards, 3 ml of 70% (v/v) ethanol were added to 50 &#181;L of extract solution and absorbance was read at 234 nm using 70% (v/v) ethanol for blank. LOX activity of the extracts was expressed as ∆ activity mg<sup>−1</sup> protein [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref36">36</xref>] .</p><p>Seed storability:</p><p>The best selection of hydrotime were stored in sealed polyethylene bag under 5˚C for 1 year. The seed qualities were evaluated every 4 months of storage.</p><p>Statistical analysis</p><p>The analysis of variance and correlation was performed for data analysis and differentiated with the Least Significant Difference (LSD) test at p &lt; 0.05 using the software R version 3.2.5 (2016-04-14) copyright (C) 2016 the R Foundation of Statistical computing platform: i386-w64-mingw32/i386 (32 bit).</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>1) Seed moisture sorption characteristic</p><p>The achievement of the increment primed seed quality needed to clarify the seed moisture sorption characteristic. Since, seed moisture sorption characteristic represented seed imbibition rate and radicle protrusion point. These data determined the hydrotime for seed hydro-priming technique. Seed moisture sorption characteristic was upon seed variety, seed germination and vigor, protein content, temperature, and water potential. Seed moisture sorption characteristic curve of Hordeum vulgare L. cv. Samerng 2 was revealed as <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p><p>10.55% wb. barley seeds were imbibed rapidly due to the large cell water potential gradient between outside water and inside seed. Bewley et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref10">10</xref>] stated that dry seed usually had water potential between −350 MPa and −50 MPa, while distilled water had water potential 0.00 MPa. Moreover, the initial uptake of water in Phase I was a consequence of the matrix forces (Ψ<sub>m</sub>) of cell walls and cell matrixes of seed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref10">10</xref>] . Water would enter to the seed rapidly in response to the low matric potential of the dry seed. The rapid imbibition rate was continued to 9 hours and the seed moisture content was 37.69% wb. Then, the imbibition rate was plateau in Phase II until 17 hours after imbibed. At this point, the radicle</p><p>was protruded with the seed moisture content of 42.74% wb. Subsequently, seed moisture content was increased again due to seedling growth. Therefore, it can be indicated that the start and end point of Phase II was 9 and 17 hours after imbibition, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> represented the seed moisture sorption characteristic of Hordeum vulgare L. cv. Samerng 2 in distilled water at 25˚C and 40% - 60% RH. The characteristics could be classified as triphasic characteristics. There consisted of a rapid initial uptake (Phase I or “Imbibition Phase”), followed by a plateau phase (Phase II or “Activation Phase”). A further increasing in water uptake occurred after germination was completed, as the embryonic axes elongated as Phase III “Growth Phase”. In generally, the seed moisture sorption characteristic was sigmoidal based on the seed imbibition theory [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref10">10</xref>] . The results by mathematical description shown that “Samerng 2” barley seed moisture sorption characteristic was polynomial of order 3 model. The polynomial equation was Y = 0.0055 x 3 − 0.267 x 2 + 4.5931 x + 13.348 . The best-of-fit reveal the coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) as 0.916. The result showed a good fitness between the experimental and predicted seed moisture content values. Similar results have been reported by many investigators for food materials and grains [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref37">37</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref38">38</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref39">39</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref40">40</xref>] .</p><p>2) Hydro-primed barley seed qualities</p><p>Barley seed germination percentage was not significantly different (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). However, germination index (GI) and seedling growth rate (SGR) were significantly increased. Additionally, mean emergence time (MET) and time to fifty percentage germination (T<sub>50</sub>) were significantly decreased for 14 - 16 hours hydro-primed seeds. The results indicated that hydro-priming technique affected to seed vigorous especially speed of germination and germination uniformity. These results were supported by previous reports that hydro-priming technique can advance germination or could improve germination rate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref41">41</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref42">42</xref>] . Vitor et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref43">43</xref>] reported that seed hydro-priming technique could reduce time to germination, resulted in rapid and uniform seedling emergence, high seed vigor, better and uniform seedling stand establishment. Ahmadi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref44">44</xref>] indicated that hydro-priming technique for 12 hours of hydrotime was efficient to improve speed of germination, vigor index and seedling dry weight of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Ghassemi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref45">45</xref>] reported that lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) seeds were improved in standard seed germination percentage and seedling emergence in filed after hydro-priming technique for 12 hours of hydrotime. Hamdollah and Kamyar [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref46">46</xref>] reported that hydro-priming technique was significantly improved germination rate, seed vigor index, and seedling dry weights of cowpea (Vigna sinensis). Singh [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref47">47</xref>] also reported that hydro-priming technique for 24 and 48 hours of hydrotime was significantly on Aegle marmelos seed germination percentage, seedling length, seedling vigor, and dry matter production more than non-primed seed. Hydro-priming technique was one of the seed priming technique which easy to operate, cheap and safe [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref14">14</xref>] . The present study showed the best hydro-primed seed vigorous for 14 - 16 hours hydrotime (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>), which was the late of Phase II.</p><p>Subsequence, non-primed and 14 - 16 hours hydro-primed seeds were evaluated in seed biochemical changing (Tables 2-4). The aim was deeply evaluation for how hydro-priming technique improved barley seed vigorous. The results found that cellular leakage was increased as hydrotime increasing. The EC value of primed barley seed at 16 hours was significantly highest than 14 hours and non-primed seed. Protein content and carbohydrate content were not significantly different between non-primed and 16 hours hydro-primed seeds, but 14 hours hydro-primed seeds were significantly decreased from non-primed seeds (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). However, lipid content was significantly decreased for 14 - 16 hours hydro-primed seeds. Catalase and α-amylase were not significantly different between non-primed and 14 - 16 hours hydro-primed seeds. Soluble sugars content such as glucose, sucrose, maltose, and amylose, (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>), were significantly decreased for 14 - 16 hours hydro-primed seeds. Nevertheless, lactose was not significantly different. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> was showed, superoxide dismutase</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Mean &#177; standard deviation values of barley seed qualities changing after hydro-priming technique</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Hydrotime (hrs.)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >smc (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Germ (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >GI</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >SGR (mg/seedling)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >MET (days)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>50</sub> (hrs.)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >non-primed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.55 &#177; 0.05b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91 &#177; 0.19a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 &#177; 0.48bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2 &#177; 0.20c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.89 &#177; 0.03ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.76 &#177; 0.82a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.12 &#177; 0.06a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90 &#177; 0.96a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23 &#177; 1.35d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.3 &#177; 0.12ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.00 &#177; 0.05a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.28 &#177; 1.50a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.05 &#177; 0.05a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89 &#177; 0.77a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26 &#177; 0.77cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.9 &#177; 0.13bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.87 &#177; 0.03b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.19 &#177; 1.10a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.79 &#177; 0.02ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89 &#177; 0.48a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 &#177; 0.40bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.7 &#177; 0.10a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.78 &#177; 0.01bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.86 &#177; 0.84a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.65 &#177; 0.03b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88 &#177; 0.67a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 &#177; 0.27b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.3 &#177; 0.02ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.68 &#177; 0.02c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.25 &#177; 0.52a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.54 &#177; 0.05b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88 &#177; 0.67a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35 &#177; 0.95a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.7 &#177; 0.09a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.44 &#177; 0.05d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.36 &#177; 1.95b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.79 &#177; 0.07ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87 &#177; 1.25a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36 &#177; 1.22a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.4 &#177; 0.03ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.41 &#177; 0.06d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.78 &#177; 2.64b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LSD<sub>0.05</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.62*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.25*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.03*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CV. (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.64</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Note the different letter(s) indicated the statistically significant difference by LSD at 5% level; CV indicated Coefficient of variation; *indicated significant differences at 5% probability level; smc = seed moisture content.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Mean &#177; standard deviation value of electrical conductivity (EC), protein content, carbohydrate content, lipid content, catalase activity (CAT), and α-amylase activity for non-primed and 14 - 16 hours hydro-primed seeds</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Treatment</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >EC (&#181;S cm<sup>−1</sup> g<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Protein (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Carbo. (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Lipid (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CAT (U/mg Protein)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >α-amylase (U/mg Protein)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >non-primed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.9 &#177; 1.58b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.2 &#177; 0.14a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.9 &#177; 0.03a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5 &#177; 0.07a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >118.21 &#177; 1.19a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.27 &#177; 0.10b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 hrs hydro-primed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.5 &#177; 0.58ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.0 &#177; 0.21b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.7 &#177; 0.02b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.3 &#177; 0.02b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >111.04 &#177; 0.99a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.82 &#177; 0.07a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 hrs hydro-primed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.9 &#177; 1.95a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.3 &#177; 0.12a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.8 &#177; 0.02a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.2 &#177; 0.03b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >113.55 &#177; 2.08a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.69 &#177; 0.11ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >114.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.59</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LSD<sub>0.05</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.5*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CV. (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.18</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Note the different letter(s) indicated the statistically significant difference by LSD at 5% level; CV indicated Coefficient of variation; *indicated significant differences at 5% probability level.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Mean &#177; standard deviation value of soluble sugars content for non-primed and 14 - 16 hours hydro-primed seeds</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Treatment</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Glucose (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sucrose (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Lactose (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Maltose (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Amylose (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >non-primed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1 &#177; 0.04a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.54 &#177; 0.11a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.99 &#177; 0.13a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25 &#177; 0.01a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.4 &#177; 0.48a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 hrs hydro-primed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9 &#177; 0.04b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.98 &#177; 0.07b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.84 &#177; 0.11a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19 &#177; 0.01b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.9 &#177; 0.28b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 hrs hydro-primed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9 &#177; 0.05b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.02 &#177; 0.11b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.71 &#177; 0.11a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19 &#177; 0.01b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.0 &#177; 0.25b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LSD<sub>0.05</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.90*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CV. (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.32</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Note the different letter(s) indicated the statistically significant difference by LSD at 5% level; CV indicated Coefficient of variation; *indicated significant differences at 5% probability level.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Mean &#177; standard deviation value of superoxide dismutase activity (SOD), lipoxygenase activity (LOX), total fatty acid content (TFA), and malondialdehyde content (MDA) for non-primed and 14 - 16 hours hydro-primed seeds</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Treatment</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >SOD (U/mg Protein)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >LOX (U/mg Protein)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TFA (mg/g DM)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >MDA (&#181;mole/g-FW)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >non-primed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.80 &#177; 0.16a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01 &#177; 0.18E−03b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.11 &#177; 0.17c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.68 &#177; 0.22a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 hrs hydro-primed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.97 &#177; 0.14a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02 &#177; 1.53E−03a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.35 &#177; 0.21a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.67 &#177; 0.10b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 hrs hydro-primed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.55 &#177; 0.13a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02 &#177; 1.52E−03a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.11 &#177; 0.05b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.49 &#177; 0.15b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LSD<sub>0.05</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.007*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.51*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.36*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CV. (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.07</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Note the different letter(s) indicated the statistically significant difference by LSD at 5% level; CV indicated Coefficient of variation; *indicated significant differences at 5% probability level.</p><p>activity (SOD) was not significantly difference between primed and non-primed seed. Lipoxygenase activity (LOX) and total fatty acid content (TFA) were significantly increased for 14 - 16 hours hydro-primed seeds. In addition, malondialdehyde content (MDA) was significantly decreased for 14 - 16 hours hydro-primed seeds. The present study indicated that the advance starch hydrolysis was occurred. Carbohydrate was hydrolyzed to soluble sugars and might be mobilized to growing tissue at the late of Phase II. Thus, soluble sugars were significantly decreased for 14 - 16 hours hydro-primed seeds. In addition, soluble sugars were antioxidant molecule. It played a role to eradicate hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) and glutathione from lipid peroxidation process. On the other hand, lipid peroxidation process was occurred by the increasing of LOX and TFA (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). Meanwhile, MDA content was significantly decreased. Hussain et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref48">48</xref>] stated that higher respiration rate may protect the plants against oxidative damage.</p><p>Furthermore, barley seed storability was presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>. Seed germination, GI, and MET can be maintain positive effect of hydro-priming technique as long as 1 year. Primed barley seed germination was 89% after 1 year storage, which was same as non-aged primed seeds. GI of 1 year primed seeds and non-aged primed seeds were the same as 30. Similarly, MET of 1 year primed seeds and non-aged primed seeds were 1.69 days and 1.73 days, respectively. However, T<sub>50</sub> was significantly increased at 8 months of storage. Therefore, it could be concluded that primed barley seeds were improved germination uniformity and storability especially by the hydrotime of 14 and 16 hours.</p><p>Additionally, the correlation of barley seed qualities weight on hydrotime was showed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>. The results clearly found that seed germination percentage and lactose content were in positive correlation. Seedling growth rate was negatively correlated with catalase activity and soluble sugars such as glucose, sucrose, and maltose. This might cause of those soluble sugars were mobilized for seedling growth. Meanwhile, speed of germination such as MET and T<sub>50</sub>, were positively correlated with EC and LOX. In the other hand, speed of germination and EC were negatively correlated with amylose content. In addition, α-amylase activity was negatively correlated with MDA. The results might be explained by the high seed vigorous, high enzyme activity, and high seedling growth, could have high metabolism for seedling growth. However, high speed of germination seed could affected to high electrolyte solute leakage. This might cause of high LOX activity which occurred for eradicate the leak electrolyte solute.</p><p>The principle of seed priming technique was induce pre-germinative metabolism and then enhance germination efficiency [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref49">49</xref>] . Suddenly when seed imbibition was occurred, the chain of metabolism activities were occurred sequent. The physiological and biochemical event were occurred during imbibition process. Bewley et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref10">10</xref>] explained that the leakage of solutes such as sugar, organic acids, ions, amino acids, and proteins were occurred suddenly after imbibition process. Cell wall rearrangement was proceeded. The aerobic respiration was occurred as well. The metabolic activities were resumed. Food reserves were mobilized. Some of the matrices, for example, protein and carbohydrate storage products in the storage organs, were later hydrolyzed to low molecular weight. These osmotically-active substrates decreased the Ψ<sub>&#182;</sub> of both the seed as a whole, and, when transported there, of the growing embryonic axis. A chain of events were initiated which ultimately results in the emergence of the embryo, usually</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> The interaction for storage duration and hydrotime on barley seed qualities</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Storage duration (months)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Treatment</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Germ (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >GI</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >SGR (mg/seedling)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >MET (days)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>50</sub> (hrs.)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >non-primed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28cde</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.25jkl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.89abcd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23fghi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.37bcdefgh</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.00ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26efg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.90fghijk</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.87bcd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28cde</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.74abcdef</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.79def</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.40bcdefg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.68efg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.75abcdef</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.45ijk</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.42bcdefg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.42ijk</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >non-primed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27cde</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.84abcd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.90abcd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.42ijk</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.64fgh</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.20defghi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.51hij</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.84ghijk</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.35jkl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.53hijk</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.48ij</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.71ghijk</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.23l</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.07kl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.29kl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >non-primed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22i</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.13ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.04a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22i</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.03abcd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.00ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23hi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.47a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.02ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23ghi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.38a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.94abcd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22hi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.23ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.00abc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27cde</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.54a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.80def</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27def</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.09abc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.84cde</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >non-primed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26efg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.51l</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.90abcd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26efgh</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.92fghijk</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.83de</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26efg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.96efghij</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.94abcd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.78abcde</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.53ghi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.25cdefghi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.71ef</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.18defghi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.49hij</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.84abcd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.45ij</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.53</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LSD<sub>0.05</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.70*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.47*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.27*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.27</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CV. (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.43</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Note the different letter(s) indicated the statistically significant difference by LSD at 5% level; CV indicated Coefficient of variation; *indicated significant differences at 5% probability level.</p><p>the radicle, signifying that germination has been successfully completed. Our observation found that lipid content was significantly decreased for 14 - 16 hours hydro-primed seeds. While protein and carbohydrate content was decreased for 14 hours hydro-primed seeds, even they were increased for 16 hours hydro-primed seeds. This might be the new protein synthesize during the late Phase II, according to <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. According to none significantly different of catalase and α-amylase activity, this might be the finished of metabolism process before late of Phase II. Meanwhile, the soluble sugars such as glucose, sucrose, maltose, and amylose were decreased for 14 - 16 hours hydro-primed seeds. These results were supplementary the presumption that food reserve mobilization was occurred at 14 and 16 hours after imbibition of barley seed.</p><p>These observations were the evidences that seed priming technique induced advance food reserves hydrolysis process. During germination, the increasing of enzyme activities such as hydrolytic enzymes were essential for the germination process [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref50">50</xref>] . The water was consumed and induced the starch hydrolysis. The sugars content were also positive correlated with seed germination and vigor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref51">51</xref>] , which according to <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>. Lee and Kim [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref52">52</xref>] reported that primed rice seeds were increased in α-amylase activity, fructose content, glucose content, but reduced sucrose content. According to Dhingra [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref53">53</xref>] , glucose was derived from endosperm by amylolytic breakdown process. Then, glucose was mobilized to the scutellum, where the sucrose synthesis occurred. After that, the glucose was transported to the embryonic axis for further seedling development. Hussain et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref48">48</xref>] stated that the better germination and vigorous growth of primed-rice seedlings was associated with 1) higher starch metabolism, 2) enhanced respiration rate, 3) better membrane integrity, 4) higher metabolite synthesis, and 5) increased activities of antioxidants in these seedlings.</p><p>Nevertheless, TFA was significantly increased for 14 - 16 hours hydro-primed seeds, while lipid content was significantly decreased. These results were related to Wang et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref54">54</xref>] who reported that degradation of lipids in senescing membranes and the release of FFA initiated oxidative deterioration by providing substrate for LOX in lipid peroxidation process. This mechanism released reactive oxygen species (ROS) from membrane phospholipids in aleurone layer and induced cell senescence [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref55">55</xref>] . ROS mediated lipid peroxidation, enzyme inactivation, protein degradation, disruption of cellular membranes and damage to genetic integrity as major cause of seed deterioration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref56">56</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref57">57</xref>] . Therefore, 14 - 16 hours hydro-primed seeds were induced TFA for lipid peroxidation process. However, the result found that MDA content was significantly decreased. Bailly et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88379-ref58">58</xref>] reported that aged seed had accumulated in malondialdehyde, as a result of lipid peroxidation process and led to seed deterioration. However, cellular damage caused by lipid peroxidation process might be prevented by protective mechanism. The protective mechanism or defenses mechanism was activated by antioxidant enzyme activity such as ascorbate peroxidase (APX), catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), superoxide dismutase (SOD). These enzymes eradicated hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>), glutathione, and MDA, which were released from lipid peroxidation process. Wherewith, our observation indicated that TFA and LOX were significantly increased, while MDA was significantly decreased. Hence, hydro-priming technique strengthened the antioxidant activity. Although, our observation indicated that CAT and SOD were not significantly, even free radicle such as soluble sugars were significantly decreased. Therefore, there might be some enzymes or mechanism to eradicate or inhibit lipid peroxidation process.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>Hydro-priming technique was one of the effective seed priming techniques to improve germination and vigor, especially speed of germination and germination uniformity. In this study, the best seed vigor occurred at 14 and 16 hours of hydrotime. Primed barley seeds speeded up 25% or 0.5 days to final germination. In addition, primed barley seeds were reduced 50% or 17 hours to reach fifty percentage germination with 36 seedling per day, while 28 seedling per day was found in non-primed seeds, wherewith non-different in final seed germination percentage. Additionally, lipoxygenase activity (LOX) and total free fatty acid (TFA) were increased, but malondialdehyde (MDA) content was decreased for 14 - 16 hours hydro-primed seeds. However, the antioxidant activities such as CAT and SOD were not significantly different from non-primed seeds. Including, free radicles such as soluble sugars were decreased. It might be stated that protective mechanism prevented cellular damage by scavenging free radicle. Then, motivated seed storability of 14 - 16 hours hydro-primed seeds could be stored for 8 - 12 months. Therefore, our experiment could be concluded that hydro-priming technique for 14 and 16 hours could enhance barley seed germination and vigor by reducing germination time, induced defenses mechanism, and could be stored for 8 - 12 months. Nevertheless, hydro-priming technique needed good practice in dry back process and hydro-primed seed needed low storage temperature (5 to −4 degree Celsius).</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors gratefully acknowledge Samerng Rice Research Center for barley seeds support, and Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agricultural, Kasetsart University for facility and financial support.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Junhaeng, P., Thobunluepop, P., Chanprasert, W., Onwimol, D., Nakasathien, S. and Pawelzik, E. (2018) The Seed Water Sorption Isotherm and Antioxidant-Defensive Mechanisms of Hordeum vulgare L. Primed Seeds. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 9, 2385-2407. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2018.912173</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.88379-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Prachaya, N. and Attachai, J. (1998) Simulation of the Influence of Planting Date on Barley. Academic Paper, 54th Multiple Cropping Center, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 26 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yupakanit</surname><given-names> P. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2007</year>)<article-title>Malt and Wort Characteristics of 42 Cereal Rice Varieties Cultivated in Thailand</article-title><source> Kasetsart Journal (Natural Science)</source><volume> 41</volume>,<fpage> 15</fpage>-<lpage>20</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Akaranuchat, P. (2009) Control of Seed-Borne Fungi by Using Radio Frequency to Maintain Barley Seed Quality. Thesis, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 62 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aziza, A., Asgedom, H. and Becker, M. (2004) Seed Priming Enhances Germination and Seedling Growth of Barley under Conditions of P and Zn Deficiency. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 167, 630-636. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200420425</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ghana, S.G. and Schillinger, W.F. (2003) Seed Priming Winter Wheat for Germination, Emergence, and Yield. Crop Science, 43, 2135-2141. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2003.2135</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jafar, M.Z., Farooq, M., Cheema, M.A., Afzal, I., Basra, S.M.A., Wahid, M.A., Aziz, T. and Shahid, M. (2012) Improving the Performance of Wheat by Seed Priming Under Saline Conditions. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 198, 38-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2011.00485.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mohamed, A.E. and Hannchi, C. (2012) Seed Priming to Improve Germination and Seedling Growth of Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) under Salt Stress. EurAsian Journal of BioSciences, 6, 76-84.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hamed</surname><given-names> A.N. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2013</year>)<article-title>The Effects of Seed Priming Techniques in Improving Germination and Early Seedling Growth of Aeluropus Macrostachy</article-title><source> International Journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research</source><volume> 1</volume>,<fpage> 86</fpage>-<lpage>95</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Asbrouck, J.V. (2006) Seed Priming &amp; Enhancement: Priming Technology. The Training Workshop on Seed Priming &amp; Enhancement, Kasetsart University, Bangkok.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bewley, J.D., Bradford, K.J., Hilhorst, H.W.M. and Nonogaki, H. (2013) Seeds: Physiology of Development, Germination, and Dormancy. 3rd Edition, Springer New York Heidelberg Dordrecht London, 391 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4693-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Leubner, G. (2006) The Seed Biology Place. http://www.seedbiology.de</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lewis, J.M. and Young, T.W. (2002) Brewing. Chapman &amp; Hall, Springer, London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Crowe, J.H. and Crowe, L.M. (1992) Membrane Integrity in an Hydrobiotic Organisms: Toward a Mechanism for Stabilizing Dry Seeds. In: Somero, G.N., Osmond, C.B. and Bolis, C.L., Eds., Water and Life, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 87-103. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76682-4_7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Bradford, K.J. and Bewley, J.D. (2002) Seeds: Biology, Technology and Role in Agriculture. In: Chrispeels, M.J. and Sadava, D.E., Eds., Plants, Genes and Crop Biotechnology, 2nd Edition, Jones and Bartlett, Boston, Chapter 9, 210-239.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zheng, G., Wilen, R.W., Slinkard, A.E. and Gusta, L.V. (1994) Enhancement of Canola Seed Germination and Seedling Emergence at Low Temperature by Priming. Crop Science, 34, 1589-1593. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183X003400060031x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sharma, A.D., Rathore, S.V.S., Srinivasan, K. and Tyagi, R.K. (2014) Comparison of Various Seed Priming Methods for Seed Germination, Seedling Vigour and Fruit Yield in Okra (Abelmoschuse sculentus L., Moench). Scientia Horticulturae, 165, 75-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2013.10.044</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kazem, G.G., Afsaneh, C.J., Safar, N. and Mohammad, M. (2010) Effects of Hydro-Priming Duration on Seedling Vigour and Grain Yield of Pinto Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Cultivars. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 38, 109-113.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Naceur</surname><given-names> D. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2012</year>)<article-title>Seed Hydropriming Effect on Triticum durum and Hordeum vulgare Germination, Seedling Growth and Resistance to Fusarium culmorum</article-title><source> Plant Pathology Journal</source><volume> 11</volume>,<fpage> 77</fpage>-<lpage>86</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ibrahim, N.D., Bhadmus, Z. and Singh, A. (2013) Hydro-Priming and Re-Drying Effects on Germination, Emergence and Growth of Upland Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Nigerian Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 21, 157-164.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">International Seed Testing Association (ISTA) (2011) International Rules for Seed Testing. Seed Science and Technology. The International Seed Testing Association, Bassersdof, 540 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Clewer, A.G. and Scarisbrick, D.H. (2001) Practical Statistics and Experimental Design for Plant and Crop Science. John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd., Hoboken, 332 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Demir, I., Ermis, S., Mavi, K. and Matthews, S. (2008) Mean Germination Time of Pepper Seed Lots (Capsicum annuum L.) Predicts Size and Uniformity of Seedlings in Germination Tests and Transplant Modules. Seed Science and Technology, 36, 21-30. https://doi.org/10.15258/sst.2008.36.1.02</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Coolbear, P., Francis, A. and Grierson, D. (1984) The Effect of Low Temperature Pre-Sowing Treatment on the Germination Performance and Membrane Integrity of Artificially Aged Tomato Seeds. Journal of Experimental Botany, 35, 1609-1617. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/35.11.1609</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">&amp;Aring;man, P., Westerluan, E. and Theander, O. (1994) Determination of Starch Using a Thermostable α-Amylase. In: Bemiller, J.N., Manners, D.J. and Sturgeon, R.J., Eds., Methods in Carbohydrate Chemistry, Academic Press, New York, 111-115.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lam, H.S. and Proctor, A. (2000) Rapid Method for Milled Rice Total Lipid and Free Fatty Acid Determination. AAES Research Series, 291-295.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Walde, P. and Nastruzzi, C. (1991) Application of a New, Simple and Economic Colorimetric Method for the Determination of Non-Esterified Fatty Acids in Vegetable Oils. Food Chemistry, 39, 249-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(91)90143-C</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aebi, H. (1984) Catalase in Vitro. Methods in Enzymology, 105, 121-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(84)05016-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Perten</surname><given-names> H. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1966</year>)<article-title>A Colorimetric Method for the Determination of Alpha-Amylase Activity (ICC Method)</article-title><source> International Association for Cereal Chemistry</source><volume> 43</volume>,<fpage> 336</fpage>-<lpage>342</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alexander, R.R., Griffiths, J.M. and Willkinson, M.L. (1985) Basic Biochemical Methods. John Wiley &amp; Sons, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Juliano, B.O., Perez, C.M. and Blakeney, A.B. (1981) International Cooperative Testing on the Amylose Content of Milled Rice. Starch, 33, 157-162. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.19810330504</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McGrance, S.J., Cornell, H.J. and Rix, C.J. (1998) A Simple and Rapid Colorimetric Method for the Determination of Amylose in Starch Products. Starch, 50, 158-163. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-379X(199804)50:4&lt;158::AID-STAR158&gt;3.0.CO;2-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Juan, G., Luis, A. and David, B. (2006) Isolation and Molecular Characterization of Makal (Xanthosomayu catanensis) Starch. Starch, 58, 300-307. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.200500451</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Oberley, L.W. and Spitz, D.R. (1985) Assay of Superoxide Dismutase Using Nitroblue Tetrazolium. In: Greenwald, R.A., Ed., Handbook of Methods for Oxygen Radical Research, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 217-221.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dhindsa, R.S., Dhindsa, P.P. and Thorpe, T.A. (1981) Leaf Senescence: Correlated with Increase Leaves of Membrane Permeability and Lipid Peroxidation and Decreased Levels of Superoxide Dismutase and Catalase. Journal of Experimental Botany, 32, 93-101. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/32.1.93</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shi, Q.H., Zhu, Z.J., Xu, M., Qian, Q.Q. and Yu, J.Q. (2006) Effect of Excess Manganese on the Antioxidant System in Cucumis sativus L. under Two Light Intensities. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 58, 197-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.08.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Meshehdani, T., Pokorny, J., Davídek, J. and Pánek, J. (1990) The Lipoxygenase Activity of Rapeseed. Food, 34, 727-734.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zomoradian, A. and Tavakoli, R.A. (2007) The Adsorption-Desorption Hysteresis Effect on Pistachio Nuts. Journal of Agricultural Technology, 9, 259-265.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zomorodian, A. (1979) Thin-and-Thick-Layer Drying Characteristics for Iranaian Rough Rice Varieties. M.S. Thesis, Shiraz University, Shiraz.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arogba, S.S. (2001) Effect of Temperature on the Moisture Sorption Isotherm of a Biscuit Containing Processed Mango (Mangifera indica) Kernel Flour. Journal of Food Engineer, 48, 121-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(00)00144-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hii, C.L., Law, C.L. and Cloke, M. (2009) Modeling Using a New Thin Layer Drying Model and Product Quality of Cocoa. Journal of Food Engineer, 90, 191-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.06.022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cheng, Z. and Bradford, K.J. (1999) Hydrothermal Time Analysis of Tomato Seed Germination Responses to Priming Treatments. Journal of Experimental Botany, 50, 89-99. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/50.330.89</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schwember, A.R. and Bradford, K.J. (2011) Oxygen Interacts with Priming, Moisture Content and Temperature to Affect the Longevity of Lettuce and Onion Seeds. Seed Science Research, 21, 175-185. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960258511000080</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vitor, H.V.M., Nascente, A.S., Neves, P.C.F., Taillebois, J.E. and Oliveira, F.H.S. (2016) Seed Hydropriming in Upland Rice Improves Germination and Seed Vigor and Has No Effects on Crop Cycle and Grain Yield. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 10, 1534-1542. https://doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.2016.10.11.PNE70</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ahmadi, A., Mardeh, A.S., Poustini, K. and Jahromi, M.E. (2007) Influence of Osmo and Hydropriming on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Cultivars under Different Moisture and Temperature Conditions. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 10, 4043-4049. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2007.4043.4049</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ghassemi, G.K., Aliloo, A.A., Valizadeh, M. and Moghaddam, M. (2008) Effects of Hydro and Osmo-Priming on Seed Germination and Field Emergence of Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.). Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 36, 29-33.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hamdollah, E. and Kamyar, K. (2011) Effect of Seed Priming on Germination Properties and Seedling Establishment of Cowpea (Vigna sinensis). Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 3, 113-116. https://doi.org/10.15835/nsb346338</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Singh</surname><given-names> R. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2017</year>)<article-title>Effects of Hydro-Priming on Seed Germination and Vigour of Aegle marmelos</article-title><source> Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry</source><volume> 6</volume>,<fpage> 446</fpage>-<lpage>449</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hussain, S., Khan, F., Hussain, H.A. and Nie, L. (2016) Physiological and Biochemical Mechanisms of Seed Priming-Induced Chilling Tolerance in Rice Cultivars. Front Plant Science, 7, 116. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00116</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ventura, L., Donà, M., Macovei, A., Carbonera, D., Buttafava, A., Mondoni, A., Rossi, G. and Blestrazzi, A. (2012) Understanding the Molecular Pathways Associated with Seed Vigor. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 60, 196-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.07.031</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Simon, E.W. (1984) Early Events in Germination. In: Marray, D.R., Ed., Germination and Reserve Mobilization, Academic Press, Cambridge, 77-115. Sen Gupta, A., Webb, R.P., Holaday, A.S. and Allen, R.D. (1993) Over Expression of Superoxide Dismutase Protects Plants from Oxidative Stress. Plant Physiology, 103, 1067-1073. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-511902-3.50008-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thobunluepop, P. (2008) Characterization of a Botanical Fungicide from Thai Origin and Its Efficiency in Rice Production. PhD Thesis, Cuvillier Verlag, G&amp;ouml;ttingen, 156 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lee, S.S. and Kim, J.H. (1999) Morphological Change, Sugar Content, and α-Amylase Activity of Rice Seeds under Various Priming Conditions. Korean Journal of Crop Science, 44, 138-142.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dhingra, H.R. (1984) Physiological and Biochemical Studies on the Effect of Salt Stress on Maize (Zea mays L.) Pollen. PhD Thesis, HAU, Hisar.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, J., Fujimoto, K., Miyazawa, T., Endo, Y. and Kitamura, K. (1990) Sensitivity of Lipoxygenase-Lacking Soybean Seeds to Accelerated Ageing and Their Chemiluminescence Levels. Phytochemistry, 29, 3739-3742. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9422(90)85323-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McCord, J.M. (2000) The Evolution of Free Radicals and Oxidative Stress. American Journal of Medicine, 108, 652-659. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9343(00)00412-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Smith, M.T. and Berjak, P. (1995) Deteriorative Changes Associated with the Loss of Viability of Stored Desiccation-Tolerant and Desiccation-Sensitive Seeds. In: Kigel, J. and Galili, G., Eds., Seed Development and Germination, Marcel Dekker, New York, 853 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>McDonald</surname><given-names> M.B. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1999</year>)<article-title>Seed Deterioration: Physiology, Repair and Assessment</article-title><source> Seed Science and Technology</source><volume> 27</volume>,<fpage> 177</fpage>-<lpage>237</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88379-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bailly, C., Benamar, A., Corbineau, F. and C&amp;ocirc;me, D. (1996) Changes in Malondialdehyde Content and in Superoxide Dismutase, Catalase and Glutathione Reductase Activities in Sunflower Seeds as Related to Deterioration during Accelerated Aging. Physiology Plant, 97, 104-110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1996.tb00485.x</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>