<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJCC</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Climate Change</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2167-9495</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajcc.2018.74034</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJCC-88349</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Climatological Hydric Balance and the Trends Analysis Climatic in the Region of Machado in Minas Gerais State, Brazil
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gustavo</surname><given-names>Souza Rodrigues</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fernando</surname><given-names>Ferrari Putti</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Antônio</surname><given-names>Carlos da Silva</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Alisson</surname><given-names>Souza de Oliveira</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Luís</surname><given-names>Roberto Almeida Gabriel Filho</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Paulista State University Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP), Botucatu, Brazil</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>1</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>José Rosário Vellano University (UNIFENAS), Alfenas, Brazil</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Machado Higher Education and Research Center (CESEP), Machado, Brazil</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>22</day><month>10</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>558</fpage><lpage>574</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>30,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2018</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>5,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2018</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>8,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2018</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Lately the planet’s climate has been constantly changing, caused mainly by global warming which has exposed a great deal of concern to the population over the years. In order to understand the possible impacts that such changes may have on the environment and society in general, the importance of the analysis of climate and hydrological events trends and their performance in a region is justified. The objective of the present work was to perform the climatic classification and to evaluate the behavior of the Climatological Hydric Balance—CHB, from the region of Machado state of Minas Gerais—MG, taking into account a historical series of 55 years of climatic season data of the National Institute of Meteorology—INMET; to verify the occurrence of climatic changes by the temporal trends of precipitation and the average temperature, using the Mann-Kendall and Pettitt method; and the influence of these possible climate changes on CHB behavior and on the region’s climate classification. Based on the results found it verified the increase in the water deficit between the months of June to September and a reduction in the water surplus from November to February. By means of the trend analysis, there was a positive trend of increase in the average temperature of 1.6
  &#176;C until the year 2100. The continuity and occurrence of these trends may have impacts on the economy, agriculture, the hydrological cycle, and consequently on the fauna, the flora and the population.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Climatic Series</kwd><kwd> Global Warming</kwd><kwd> IPCC</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The world’s climate activity has been suffering severe changes, producing a raise in the number of environmental disasters and natural catastrophes, causing huge financial losses in many areas of the planet [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref1">1</xref>] . The studies and frequent discussions about natural resources and climate changes happen due to its importance to the existence of life on the planet, and, mainly, for its exaggerated and uncontrolled use [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>The damage to the society, to the economy and to the environment caused by climate changes is frequently showed by the press and, among the most relevant economic activities, Cec&#237;lio et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref3">3</xref>] and Pereira et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref4">4</xref>] point out that the agribusiness sector is more dependent on the climate conditions. It happens because the climate conditions affect all of the phases of the productive chain, since the preparation of the soil for the seeding until the harvest, the transportation, the preparation, the products’ storage and their commercialization.</p><p>In order to have an adequate planning of the tillage, the climate conditions and the soil from the different agricultural regions have to be considered. Thus, the good establishment of a crop in the tillage depends mainly on the water availability, on the soil technical features, on the amount of heat and solar energy. When a shortfall or excess of these elements occurs, it will possibly reduce the tillage’s productivity.</p><p>According to Marin et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref2">2</xref>] , The Climate Hydric Balance―CHB is an important tool to study the clime of a certain region. In this sense, the CHB, described by Thornthwaite and Mather (1955), is used to monitor the water storage’s variation in soil-plant-atmosphere system.</p><p>The CHB can be calculated by the accounting of the natural supply of groundwater, rainfall (P) and atmospheric demand, through the potential evapotranspiration (ETP), and with a maximum level of storage or available water capacity, appropriate to the present study. The CHB provides estimative of water deficiency (DEF), water surplus (EXC), real evapotranspiration (ETR) and storage of groundwater (ARM). The CHB can be elaborated in a daily scale, in specific days, or monthly or annual scale [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>The Knowledge of the CHB elements guides the agricultural planning and management. Besides, it supports the climate and agro ecological zoning; the definition of the most appropriate times for the main processes in the crop, such as soil preparation, seeding and planting, pulverization and harvest; the estimation of the crops productivity; irrigation design and management; management of hydric resources in river basins; the selection and sizing of techniques for the conservation of water and soils [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>According to the IPCC report [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref1">1</xref>] , it is clear that the earth’s temperature is increasing and the projections to the end of this century point to raises from 1.1˚C to 6.4˚C in the average air temperature, in many places around the earth, including Brazil. It could bring considerable losses to agriculture and livestock activities and a new agroclimatic aptitude configuration to the many agricultural crops around the world.</p><p>Studies aiming the detection of possible climate tendencies applied satisfactorily the Mann-Kendell method in climate variations. The World Meteorological Organization (OMM) suggests this test for tendency identification in time series [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref10">10</xref>] . In order to find if there was sudden change in the average of the series we can use the Pettitt test [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref11">11</xref>] . Two samples from the same time series that could be considered belonging to the same population were analyzed.</p><p>Salviano, Groppo e Pellegrino [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref8">8</xref>] analyses the time inclinations of the average temperature and precipitation in Brazil. They show that these tendencies are not significant regarding precipitation in a big part of the country. However, the average temperature showed a significant raising tendency in a big part of Brazil over the year. Queiroz [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref9">9</xref>] tried to evaluate this tendency in 46 historical series in the State of Minas Gerais using the Mann-Kendall test and other methodologies. He found an increasing tendency in many historical series.</p><p>In the same way, the study of the climate information daily collected is of great importance to study and predict the main severe hydric phenomena such as droughts, storms and hail rains. Those phenomena are essential to understand the climate changes and the possible impacts that they may cause in a certain area [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>The objective of this work was to evaluate the behavior of BHC and to determine the existence of changes in the climate due to the temporal trends of precipitation and the average temperature in the Machado-MG region, investigating the influence of possible climatic changes on BHC behavior.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Description of Study Area</title><p>The studying area is represented by the city of Machado, located in the micro region of Alfenas in the south of the Minas Gerais state. It has a territorial area of approximately 586 km<sup>2</sup> and is located in the geographic coordinates of latitude 21˚40'30''S and longitude 45˚55'12''W. Its main economic activity is the agriculture exploitation and coffee is the main economic product and a massive generator of employment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref12">12</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Climate Data</title><p>In order to use the statistic method determined for this research, a meteorological mean of 55 years of daily climate data was applied. The data is from to the climatological station of the INMET―National Institute of Meteorology located in Machado-MG.</p><p>The data obtained in INMET are related to the monthly and annual means of a historical series from 1961 to 2015, referring to temperature and precipitation. The organization and tabulation of the data were executed using an electronic speadsheet.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Methodology of Hydric Balance and Climate Classification</title><p>According to Marin et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref2">2</xref>] the CHB can be determined through the local or sectional hydric availability information, the calculation of water deficit (DEF), the water excess (EXC) and the removal and recharging of groundwater.</p><p>In order to elaborate and estimate the CHB by Thornhwaite and Mather method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref13">13</xref>] the balance between the inputs and outputs of water in the soil-plant system is made taking into account the storage capacity of soil water (CAD). The storage capacity of soil water (CAD) represents the maximum water availability that a certain kind of soil can retain depending on their physical characteristics.</p><p>To elaborate the CHB of this research, we used a model of an electronic spreadsheet developed by Rolim, Sentelhas and Barbieri [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref14">14</xref>] . When the CHB has only climatic purposes, the use of CAD in the soil being equivalent to 100 or 125 mm is recommended.</p><p>Firstly, monthly climatic potential evapotranspiration, in mm, was estimated through the Thornthwaite and Mather [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref13">13</xref>] method, in which the uncorrected monthly evapotranspiration potential was calculated (considering 12 hour days and a 30 days month). Then, it was multiplied by the correction factor, which is a dependent on the latitude and on the months of the year.</p><p>ETP = 16 ( 10 t / I ) a (1)</p><p>ETP = potential evapotranspiration for a 30 days month with a 12 hour insolation (mm), t is the average temperature of the month (˚C) and a is the cubic function of I (that can be calculated by the formula)</p><p>a = 6.75 &#215; 10 − 7 I 3 − 7.71 &#215; 10 − 5 I 2 + 1.792 &#215; 10 − 2 I + 0.49239 (2)</p><p>I is the annual calorific value.</p><p>The value of I can be calculated by summing the 12 values of the monthly calorific indices (i), which can be calculated by the following formula:</p><p>i = ( t ′ / 5 ) 1 , 514 (3)</p><p>t’ is the common monthly average temperature (˚C).</p><p>After estimating the evapotranspiration, the calculation of Thornthwaite and Mather [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref13">13</xref>] started. To do so, some calculation factors used in CHB are necessary:</p><p>P-ETP: Calculates the difference between precipitation P and the estimated potential evapotranspiration (ETP) in order to collect positives and negative balances. In most areas, the most common is the occurrence of a rainy season followed by a drought. In the humid months P-ETP are positives, indicating excessive rainfall, while in the dry months P-ETP is negative, representing potential water loss. When the situation is the water recharge in the soil, that is, whenever the (PETP) ≥ 0, it has to be added to ARM (storage) of the previous period and through this new ARM, it is possible to calculate the new NAc (accumulated negative) by the following expression:</p><p>NAc = CAD ( ln ARM CAD ) (4)</p><p>When there is withdrawal of the water in the soil, that is, when the (P-ETP) &lt; 0, it has to be accumulated and through the (P-ETP) we calculate the ARM, using the following expression:</p><p>First, we calculate the Nac by the equation:</p><p>NAc = NAc + NAc previous (5)</p><p>Then, we calculate the ARM:</p><p>ARM = CAD ( e − | NAc CAD | ) (6)</p><p>ALT―Storage Alteration</p><p>ALT = ARM − ARM anterior (7)</p><p>ALT &gt; 0 There was replacement</p><p>ALT &lt; 0 There was withdrawal of water from the soil</p><p>ETR―Real Evapotranspiration</p><p>If,</p><p>ETR = P + | ALT | (8)</p><p>If ( P − ETP ) ≥ 0 ,</p><p>ETR = ETP (9)</p><p>DEF―Hydric deficiency: refers to the amount that the soil-plant system did not evapotranspirate</p><p>DEF = ETP − ETR (10)</p><p>EXC―Water surplus: it is related to the water that the soil cannot retain or evapotranspirate</p><p>If ARM &lt; CAD ,</p><p>EXC = 0 (11)</p><p>If ARM = CAD ,</p><p>EXC = ( P − ETP ) − ALT (12)</p><p>In order to do the climate classification by the Thornthwaite and Mather method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref13">13</xref>] , we use indices calculated based on the CHB. The hydric index (I<sub>n</sub>), the arid index (I<sub>a</sub>) and the humidity index (I<sub>u</sub>), connected to the hydric availability, are defined from the annual values. The climate types (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) were defined based on the humidity index (I<sub>u</sub>), while the subtypes were defined by the arid index (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>I h = ( EXC / ETP ) &#215; 100 (13)</p><p>I a = ( DEF / ETP ) &#215; 100 (14)</p><p>I u = I h − ( 0.6 &#215; I a ) (15)</p><p>In order to classify the thermal factor (TE), the climate types are defined based on the annual potential evapotranspiration (annual ETP). The subtypes depend on the percentage relation between the potential evapotranspiration in the</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Climate types, according to Thornthwaite, based on the humidity index (I<sub>u</sub>)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Climate types</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Humidity index (I<sub>u</sub>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A → super humid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >I<sub>u</sub> ≥ 100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B<sub>4</sub> →humid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80 ≤I<sub>u</sub> &lt; 100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B<sub>3</sub> → humid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60 ≤I<sub>u</sub> &lt; 80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B<sub>2</sub> → humid 40 ≤ I<sub>u</sub> &lt; 60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 ≤I<sub>u</sub> &lt; 60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B<sub>1</sub> → humid 20 ≤ I<sub>u</sub> &lt; 40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 ≤ I<sub>u</sub> &lt; 40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C<sub>2</sub> → semi-humid 0 ≤ I<sub>u</sub> &lt; 20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 ≤ I<sub>u</sub> &lt; 20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C<sub>1</sub> → dry semi-humid −20 ≤ I<sub>u</sub> &lt; 0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−20 ≤ I<sub>u</sub> &lt; 0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D → semi-arid −40 ≤ I<sub>u</sub> &lt; −20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−40 ≤ I<sub>u</sub> &lt; −20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >E → arid −60 ≤ I<sub>u</sub> &lt; −40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−60 ≤ I<sub>u</sub> &lt; −40</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Climatic subtypes, according to Thornthwaite, based on the arid (I<sub>a</sub>) and hydric (I<sub>h</sub>) indexes</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Humid climes (A, B, C2)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Arid index (I<sub>a</sub>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >r → without or with a small hydric deficit</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 ≤ I<sub>a</sub> &lt; 16.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >s → moderate hydric deficit in the summer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.7 ≤ I<sub>a</sub> &lt; 33.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >w → moderate hydric deficit in the winter</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.7 ≤ I<sub>a</sub> &lt; 33.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >s<sub>2</sub> → big hydric deficit in the summer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >I<sub>a</sub> ≥ 33.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >w<sub>2</sub> → big hydric deficit in the winter</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >I<sub>a</sub> ≥ 33.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dry climes (C1, D, E)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Arid index (I<sub>a</sub>)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >d → small or null water surplus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 ≤ I<sub>h</sub> &lt; 10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >s → moderate water surplus in the summer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 ≤ I<sub>h</sub> &lt; 20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >w → moderate water surplus in the winter</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 ≤ I<sub>h</sub> &lt; 20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >s<sub>2</sub> → big water surplus in the summer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >I<sub>h</sub> ≥ 33.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >w<sub>2</sub> → big water surplus in the winter</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >I<sub>h</sub> ≥ 33.3</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>summer and the annual potential evapotranspiration (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). ETP was used because it depends directly on the temperature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref13">13</xref>] .</p><p>TE = ETP anual (16)</p><p>TE = ( ETP nover a ˜ o / ETP anual ) &#215; 100 (17)</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Methodology of Tendency Analysis―Mann-Kendall and Pettitt Test</title><p>The non-parametric tendency test of Mann-kendall―MK [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref16">16</xref>] , consists of comparing each value of the time series with the rest of the values, always in a sequential order, counting the number of the times that the rest of the terms are higher than the analyzed value. The method describes the tendency of a time data series. It is appropriated when the case could be assumed as monotonic, therefore, they do not present any seasonal cycle or another tendency in the data</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Climatic types and subtypes according to Thornthwaite, basead on the thermal index</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Climate types</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ETP annual (mm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Climate Subtypes</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >(ETP in the summer /ETP annual) *100</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A ′ → megathermic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ETP ≥ 1140</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >a ′</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Less than 48.0%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B ′ 4 →mesothermic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1140 &gt;ETP ≥ 997</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >b ′ 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >between 48.0% and less than 51.9%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B ′ 3 →mesothermal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >997 &gt; ETP ≥ 885</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >b ′ 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >between 51.9% and less than56.3%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B ′ 2 →mesothermal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >885 &gt; ETP ≥ 712</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >b ′ 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >between 56.3% and less than 61.6%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B ′ 1 → mesothermal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >712 &gt; ETP ≥ 570</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >b ′ 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >between 61.6% and less than 68.0%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C ′ 2 → microthermal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >570 &gt; ETP ≥ 427</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >c ′ 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >between 68.0% and less than 76.3%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C ′ 1 → microthermal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >427 &gt; ETP ≥ 287</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >c ′ 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >between 76.3% and less than 88.0%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D ′ → tundra</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >287 &gt; ETP ≥ 142</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >d ′</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >equal or more than 88.0%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >E ′ → perpetual ice</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ETP &lt; 142</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref17">17</xref>] . The MK method is the most appropriate to analyze climate changes in climatological series. It is suggest by the World Meteorological Organization (OMM) to identify tendencies in time series [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref18">18</xref>] .</p><p>In MK test, the S statistic is calculated by the summing of all counts, as follows:</p><p>S = ∑ i = 1 n − 1 ∑ j = i + 1 n sgn ( x j − x i ) (18)</p><p>In which,</p><p>sgn ( x j − x i ) = { + 1 ;       if   x j ≥ x i 0 ;           if   x j = x i − 1 ;       if   x j &lt; x i (19)</p><p>The S statistic tends to normality for a large n, with mean and variance given by:</p><p>E [ S i ] = 0 V a r ( s ) = n ( n − 1 ) ( 2 n + 5 ) − ∑ j = 1 p t j ( t j − 1 ) ( 2 t j + 5 ) 18 (20)</p><p>In which n is the size of the time series. Therefore, the statistic test Z is given by:</p><p>Z = { S − 1 ( V a r ( S ) ) 1 2       s e       S &gt; 0 0                                   s e       S = 0 S + 1 ( V a r ( S ) ) 1 2       s e       S &lt; 0 (21)</p><p>The considerable statistic tendency in the temporal series is measured by the Z value. This statistic is used to test the null hypothesis that the tendency does not exist. In Mann-Kendall test, a tendency is considered positive or negative, indicating a decrease or increase in the elements of the analyzed series, the case of Kandall’s Tau is negative or positive. The statistical significance was analyzed by the p-value test. The null hypothesis is not reject if p value is more or equal a; if p is less than a, the null hypothesis is rejected [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref16">16</xref>] .</p><p>In addition to the MK test, I did the Pettitt non parametric statistic test in order to evaluate the occurrence of abrupt changes in the means of the historical series. According to Pettitt [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref11">11</xref>] , this test indicates if two samples from the same temporal series can be considered belonging to the same population.</p><p>The Petit test verifies two samples, X 1 , X 2 , ⋯ , X t e X t + 1 , X t + 2 , ⋯ , X T <sub> </sub>belonging to the same population, providing also information about the data homogeneity from the historical series analyzed. This statistic finds the point where an abrupt change in a temporal series occurred [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>The U<sub>t,T</sub> statistic counts the times that a member of the first sample is higher than a member of the second sample. It can be written as:</p><p>U t , T = U t − 1 , T + ∑ j = 1 T sgn ( X i − X j ) (22)</p><p>for t = 2 , ⋯ , T</p><p>where: sgn(x) = 1 para x &gt; 0; sgn(x) = 0 for x = 0; sgn(x) = −1 for x &lt; 0.</p><p>The U<sub>t,T</sub> statistic is calculated for the 1 &lt; t &lt; T values and the K(t) statistic from Pettitt test is the maximum absolute value for U<sub>t,T</sub>. This statistic locates the changing point of a temporal series and its meaning. It can be described as:</p><p>k ( t ) = M A X 1 ≤ t ≤ T | U t , T | (23)</p><p>p ≅ 2 exp { − 6 k ( t ) 2 / T 3 + T 2 } (24)</p><p>The abrupt changing point is the time (t) where there is the maximum k(t). We can calculate the critical K values by the equation:</p><p>K c r i t = &#177; − ln ( p / 2 ) ( T 3 + T 2 ) 6 (25)</p><p>The significance level used was 5%.</p><p>The software extension XLSTAT 2014.5.03, for Microsoft Office Excel, was used in order to analyse and organize the data.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Climatological Hydric Balance and Climate Classification</title><p>From of the graphs of surplus and water deficit we can precisely establish the driest periods, the rainy seasons, the traffic conditions for supplies and machines, the best seasons for the development of vegetation and for the beginning of a recovery process from degraded areas through the hydric surplus and deficiency graphics. The CHB analysis shows that, in the region of Machado, the dry season, when the highest hydric deficits are observed, maintains close values for the different periods analyzed: a) Period (1961-1979), b) Period (1979-1998); c) Period (1998-2015); d) Period (1961-2015), varying between 9 to 16 mm in August, the most critical period regarding hydric deficiency (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>).</p><p>According to Matielo et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref19">19</xref>] , these climate conditions are favorable to the development of the coffee-growing in the region of Machado. According to Monteiro et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref20">20</xref>] , the climate characteristics of the region also favor the cultivation of other species, such as corn, beans and vegetables in general</p><p>The CHB shows a reduction in the hydric surplus for the specific a) Period (1961-1979), b) Period (1979-1998); c) Period (1998-2015); d) Period (1961-2015), mainly in February, October and November In August, the hydric deficit was more accentuated (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The most critical reduction in the water surplus occurs in the month of November, which reduces the volume from 107.6 mm to 11.4 mm.</p><p>According to Cunha and Martins [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref21">21</xref>] , the climatic classification of Botucatu and S&#227;o Manuel municipalities using the K&#246;ppen and Thornthwaite methodologies in air temperature and rainfall data over a period of 36 years (1971 to 2006) reinforces that both classifications showed similarities in the characterization of the climate, however, K&#246;ppen’s climatic classification loses in detail, since it does not differentiate climatic types, whereas Thornthwaite, besides taking into account temperature, precipitation and evapotranspiration, presents in detail the period of deficit and annual water surplus of a locality.</p><p>I calculated the index to do the climate classification through the information obtained in the CHB. The hydric index was (I<sub>h</sub> = 66.65), the aridity index was (I<sub>a</sub> = 1.72), and the humidity index was (I<sub>u</sub>= 65.62). Regarding the thermal factor (TE), the climate types were defined by the potential annual evapotranspiration (ETP<sub>anual</sub> = 930.77 mm) and by the percentual relation between the potential evapotranspiration in the summer and the potential annual evapotranspiration ((ETP in the summer/ETP annual) &#215; 100 = 33.60%).</p><p>Thus, the climate classification of the region of Machado is a humid mesothermic clime, with little hydric deficit (B<sub>3</sub> r B ′ 3 a ′ ).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Analysis of Climate Change Tendencies</title><p>Craparo et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref22">22</xref>] and Assad et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref23">23</xref>] approaches climate changes and global warming as the beginning of a new geological configuration in the seeding and coffee-growing (Coffea arabica) in Brazil, bringing possible economic losses. In a pessimistic scenario, about 33% of the current coffee-growing areas can became unable or of climate high risks. The MAPA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref24">24</xref>] shows that events such as hydric stress caused by the droughts, rain excess, low or high temperatures can bring serious damages to the agricultural and livestock activities.</p><sec id="s3_2_1"><title>3.2.1. Precipitation</title><p>According to the climatic data from region of Machado-MG, there is only a significant reduction tendency in October, with a rate of 1.7 mm per year, which is significant for two tests (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Mean monthly values of the volume (mm) of water deficiency and water surplus in the different periods analyzed for the region of Machado-MG</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >MONTH</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="8"  >PERIOD ANALYZED IN CHB</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1961-1979</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1979-1998</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1998-2015</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1961-2015</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DEF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >EXC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DEF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >EXC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DEF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >EXC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DEF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >EXC</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >JANUARY</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >159.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >182.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >181.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >179.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FEBRUARY</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >111.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >109.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >104.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >109.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MARCH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >117.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >APRIL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MAY</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >JUNE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >JULY</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−6.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-3.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AUGUST</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−8.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−14.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−16.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−11.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SEPTEMBER</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OCTOBER</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NOVEMBER</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >107.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DECEMBER</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >172.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >210.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >131.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >165.4</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Statistic results from the Precipitation data for the Mann-Kendall and Pettitt Test for the region of Machado-MG</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >MONTH</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >MANN-KENDALL</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >PETTITT</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >p-valor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kendall’s Tau</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p-valor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >K</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Changing point (t)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >JANUARY</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5594</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0601</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8418</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FEBRUARY</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7039</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0390</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9131</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MARCH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6020</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0532</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6738</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >126.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >APRIL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8252</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0230</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6346</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MAY</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6778</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0426</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3918</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >159.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >JUNE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9929</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0018</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4385</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >154.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >JULY</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7621</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0313</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9691</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AUGUST</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2122</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.1266</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4439</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >152.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SEPTEMBER</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5574</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0595</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6073</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >133.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OCTOBER</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0059</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.2730</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0261</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >265.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NOVEMBER</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7105</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.0541</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7936</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DECEMBER</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0598</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1156</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >208.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Santos [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref25">25</xref>] analyzing the trends in precipitation indices in a 39-year historical series of a rainfall station located in Uberl&#226;ndia-MG, concluded that although some historical series show positive trends, indicating an increase in rainfall volume, and other series negative tendencies, one can’t be sure about the relevance</p><p>of this variation, stating that this fact may be reflections of natural fluctuations and random behaviors inherent to the historical series itself.</p><p>However, Salviano, Groppo and Pellegrino [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref8">8</xref>] , in investigating the temporal trends of precipitation and average temperature in Brazil, verified that precipitation did not present significant trends in more than 70% of the Brazilian territory in every month.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_2"><title>3.2.2. Temperature</title><p>We can observe throught the climate data in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref> that there is a tendency of a raise in 0.019˚C per year in January, confirmed by the two tests, considering that according to Pettitt test, the tendency tends to occur from the year of 1994 on. To February, the tendency is a 0.016˚C raise per year, significative to Mann-Kendall and not significant for Pettitt. However, this test indicates that the tendency tends to occur at the same time as in January. April presents an increasing tendency of 0.021˚C per year, significant for the two tests, happening from 1982 on. July presents an increasing tendency of 0.016˚C per year, significant</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Statistic results of the Temperature data for Mann-kendall and Pettitt tests for Machado-MG</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >MONTH</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >MANN-KENDALL</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >PETTITT</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >p-valor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kendall’s Tau</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p-valor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >K</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Changing point (t)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >JANUARY</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0323</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2241</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0147</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >249.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FEBRUARY</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0363</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2173</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1532</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >183.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MARCH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1113</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1657</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1795</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >178.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >APRIL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3455</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >320.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MAY</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1879</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1374</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1823</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >176.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >JUNE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3064</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1071</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >128.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >JULY</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0248</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2347</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1293</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >186.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AUGUST</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4775</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0747</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6033</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SEPTEMBER</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1682</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0844</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >199.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OCTOBER</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3700</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0010</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >311.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NOVEMBER</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2265</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0590</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >195.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DECEMBER</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0178</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2474</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0036</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >248.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>for Mann-kendall and not significant for Pettitt. However, the test indicates that the tendency started in 1976. October presents an increasing tendency of 0.029˚C per year, significant for Mann-kendall and not significant for Pettitt. However, the test indicates that the tendency started in 1982. November presents an increasing tendency of 0.0016˚C per year, significant for Mann-kendall and not significant for Petit, considering that the tendency started in 1977. And for the month of December there is a trend of increase of 0.019˚C per year, significant for both tests, and the trend occurs from 1985.</p><p>In accordance with to the IPCC report [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref1">1</xref>] , it is clear that the planet’s temperature is increasing, and projections until the end of this century point to increases between 1.1˚C to 6.4˚C in the average air temperature in many areas of the planet, including Brazil. It can bring enormous damages to the agricultural and livestock activities, besides a new configuration of the agro-climatic aptitude in many agricultural crops cultivated all around the world [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref28">28</xref>] .</p><p>According to the National Supply Company―CONAB [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref29">29</xref>] the coffee harvest in South Minas must be around 10 million bags 5.09% less than the estimative published in June and 5% less than the last harvest. The last harvest was extremely damaged by the long drought and high temperatures and was of 10.8 million bags.</p><p>Avila et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref30">30</xref>] , when evaluating the trends of minimum and maximum temperatures in the State of Minas Gerais, using data from a historical series of 30 years of minimum and maximum air temperatures, from 43 municipalities, concluded that trends of increasing minimum temperatures and the highest in the month of October, for most of the municipalities of Minas Gerais.</p><p>Salviano, Groppo and Pellegrino [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88349-ref8">8</xref>] analyzing the temporal trends of precipitation and average temperature in Brazil found that the average temperature showed a significant positive trend in most of Brazil throughout the year, thus reinforcing the results of this research.</p><p>By simulating the increase in temperature from the tendency data obtained, a considerable increase in temperature is observed for the next century. The results reinforce the data obtained by the IPCC surveys, with an average increase of 1.6˚C (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>). This scenario is worrying for the coffee industry in the region because of the negative impacts that the average temperature increase brings to a given crop.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Behavior of the Climatological Hydric Balance</title><p>In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, the normal monthly CHB and the CHB extract, for the region of Machado-MG, respectively, can be visualized according to the climatological normal of the region from the data series used in this study. The dry season, when the highest values of water deficit are observed, in July, August and September, registered a total annual hydric 16 mm deficit and in the rainy season a 620.4 mm surplus.</p><p>In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, the normal monthly CHB and the CHB extract, respectively, can be visualized simulating the climate changes presented through the tendency tests. The dry season in July, August and September and April presented a deficit and had an accentuated increase in October. Thus, the annual hydric deficit was 71.5 mm and the excess in the rainy season was 488.4 mm. The relationship between the tendencies in climate changes and the reduction of the volume of water in the hydric balance is evident (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Prediction of the rise in temperature until the years of 2011 for Machado―MG area</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >MONTH</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >REGRESSION MODEL</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>2</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TEMPERATURE INCREASE YEAR 2100 (&#176;C)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >JANUARY</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−15.59717 + 0.01917*Ano</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1679</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.577</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FEBRUARY</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−10.03567 + 0.01647*Ano</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1093</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.328</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MARCH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >APRIL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−21.16785 + 0.2087*Ano</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1895</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.743</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MAY</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >JUNHO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >JULY</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−16.59154 + 0.01644*Ano</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1074</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.328</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AUGUST</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SEPTEMBER</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OCTOBER</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−38.29537 + 0.0299*Ano</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2180</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.407</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NOVEMBER</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−9.66397 + 0.01575*Ano</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0988</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.328</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DECEMBER</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−17.47673 + 0.01993*Ano</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1933</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.577</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref></label><caption><title> Monthly mean values of the volume (mm) of hydric deficiency and hydric surplus in the data analyzed for the region of Machado MG</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >MONTH</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >PERIOD ANALYZED AT BHC</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1962-2015</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1962-2100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DEF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >EXC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DEF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >EXC</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >JANUARY</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >179.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >164.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FEBRUARY</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >109.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MARCH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >APRIL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MAY</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >JUNE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >JULY</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−5.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AUGUST</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−11.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−11.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SEPTEMBER</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OCTOBER</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−52.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NOVEMBER</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DECEMBER</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >165.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >139.6</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The climate classification in the region of Machado would continuous to be a humid mesothermic clime, with little hydric deficiency. However, its category would change from B3 r B’3 a’, to B2 r B’4.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>The climate classification of the region of Machado is a humid mesothermic clime, with little hydric deficit (B<sub>3</sub> r B ′ 3 a ′ ).</p><p>The Mann-kendall test and the Pettitt test show an agreement in their results and can be used in order to identify time tendencies. There is tendency of reduction in the average volume of precipitation for October in the average of 1.7 mm per year.</p><p>There is a tendency of average temperature increase for the months of January, February, April, July, October, November and December in the average of 1.6˚C until the year 2100.</p><p>The significant tendencies in the climate variables studied show that important changes are happening, mainly in the average temperature.</p><p>The occurrence of these tendencies over the years may have impacts on agriculture, on the hydrological cycle and, consequently, on the fauna and flora and the population.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Rodrigues, G.S., Putti, F.F., da Silva, A.C., de Oliveira, A.S. and Filho, L.R.A.G. (2018) Climatological Hydric Balance and the Trends Analysis Climatic in the Region of Machado in Minas Gerais State, Brazil. American Journal of Climate Change, 7, 558-574. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajcc.2018.74034</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.88349-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change—IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate, Geneva, 151 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88349-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Marin, F.R., Assad, E.D. and Pilau, F.G. (2008) Clima e ambiente: Introdu&amp;#231;&amp;#227;o à climatologia para a ciências ambientais. Embrapa Informática Agropecuária, Campinas, SP, 127 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88349-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cecilio, R.A., Silva, K.R., Xavier, A.C. and Pezzopane, J.R.M. (2012) Method for Spatialization of the Climatic Water Balance Elements. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 47, 478-488.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88349-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Pereira, A.R., Angelocci, L.R. and Sentelhas, P.C. (2002) Agrometeorologia: Fundamentos e aplica&amp;#231;&amp;#245;es práticas. Ed. Agropecuária, Guaíba, 478 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88349-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pena, D.S. (2013) Zoneamento agroclimático do pinh&amp;#227;o manso (Jatropha curcas L.) para o estado de Goiás. 2013. 70 f. Disserta&amp;#231;&amp;#227;o (Mestrado em Agronomia: Solo e água)—Escola de Agronomia-Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiania.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88349-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pereira, A.R., Villanova, N.A. and Sediyama, G.C. (1997) Evapotranspira&amp;#231;&amp;#227;o. FEALQ, Piracicaba, 183 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88349-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Black, P. (2007) Revising the Thornthwaite and Mather Water Balance. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 43, 1604-1605.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00132.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88349-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Salviano, M.F., Groppo, J.D. and Pellegrino, G.Q. (2015) Trends Analysis of Precipitation and Temperature Data in Brazil. The Brasilian Journal of Meteorology (RBMET), 31, 64-73.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88349-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Queiroz, M.A. (2013) Avalia&amp;#231;&amp;#227;o de tendências em séries de precipita&amp;#231;&amp;#227;o diária máxima anual na faixa central do estado de Minas Gerais. 2013. 184 f. Disserta&amp;#231;&amp;#227;o (Mestre em Saneamento, Meio Ambiente e Recursos Hídricos)—Escola de Engenharia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88349-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Minuzzi, R.B. (2010) Tendências na variabilidade climática de Santa Catarina, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, 14, 1288-1293.  
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662010001200006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88349-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pettitt, A.N. (1979) A Non-Parametric Approach to the Change-Point Problem. Applied Statistics, 28, 126-135. https://doi.org/10.2307/2346729</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88349-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rodrigues, G.S., da Silva, A.C., de Oliveira, A.S., Filho, L.R.A.G. and Putti, F.F. (2018) Climate Characterization of the Machado-Mg Region through Geotechnology Techniques and Tools. American Journal of Climate Change, 7, 79-96.  
https://doi.org/10.4236/ajcc.2018.71007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88349-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thornthwaite, C.W. and Mather, J.R. (1955) The Water Balance. Climatology, 8, 104.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88349-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rolim, G.S., Sentelhas, P.C. and Barbieri, V. (1998) Planilhas no ambiente EXCEL TM para os cálculos de balan&amp;#231;os hídricos: Normal, sequencial, de cultura e de produtividade real e potencial. Revista Brasileira de Agrometeorologia, 6, 133-137.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88349-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mann, H.B. (1945) Nonparametric Tests against Trend. Econometrica, 13, 245-259.  
https://doi.org/10.2307/1907187</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88349-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kendall, M.G. (1975) Rank Correlation Methods. Charles Griffin, London, 6 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88349-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lopes, J. and Silva, D. (2013) Aplica&amp;#231;&amp;#227;o do teste de mann-kendall para análise de tendência pluviométrica no estado do Ceará. Revista de Geografia (Recife), 30, 192-208.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88349-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Goossens, C. and Berger, A. (1986) Annual and Seasonal Climatic Variations over the Northern Hemisphere and Europe during the Last Century. Annales Geophysicae, 4, 385-400.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88349-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Matiello, J.B., Santinato, R., Garcia, A.W., Almeira, S.R. and Fernandes, D.R. (2010) Cultura de café no Brasil: Manual de recomenda&amp;#231;&amp;#245;es. Gráfica Santo Ant&amp;#245;nio, Varginha, 542 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88349-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Monteiro JEBA (2009) Agrometeorologia dos cultivos: O fator meteorológico na produ&amp;#231;&amp;#227;o agrícola. INMET, Brasília, 530 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88349-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cunha, A.R. and Martins, D. (2009) Classifica&amp;#231;&amp;#227;o climática para os municípios de Botucatu e S&amp;#227;o Manuel, SP. Irriga, Botucatu, 14, 1-11.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88349-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Craparo, A.C.W., Vanasten, P.J.A., L&amp;#228;derach, P., Jassogne, L.P.T. and Grab, S.W. (2015) Coffea arabica Yields Decline in Tanzania Due to Climate Change: Global Implications. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 207, 1-10.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.03.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88349-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Assad, E.D., Pinto, H.S., Zullo Júnior, J., Evangelista, S.R.M., Otavian, A.F., ávila, M.H., Evangelista, B.A., Marin, F., Macedo Júnior, C., Pellegrino, G., Coltri, P.P. and Coral, G. (2008) A nova geografia da produ&amp;#231;&amp;#227;o agrícola no Brasil. In: Deconto, Ed., Aquecimento global e a nova geografia da produ&amp;#231;&amp;#227;o agrícola no Brasil, Embrapa Informática Agropecuária, Campinas, 82 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88349-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ministério da agricultura pecuária e abastecimento (2016) Zoneamento Agrícola de Risco Climático: Instrumento de Gest&amp;#227;o de Risco Utilizado pelo Seguro Agrícola do Brasil. http://www.agricultura.gov.br</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88349-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Santos, V.O. (2015) Identifica&amp;#231;&amp;#227;o e análise de tendências em séries históricas de precipita&amp;#231;&amp;#227;o no município de Uberlandia, Minas Gerais. In: XI Encontro Nacional da ANPEGE ENANPEGE, Presidente Prudente. Anais XI Enanpege.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88349-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Blain, G.C., Picoli, M.C.A. and Lulu, J. (2009) Análises estatísticas das tendências de eleva&amp;#231;&amp;#227;o nas séries anuais de temperatura mínima do ar no Estado de S&amp;#227;o Paulo. Bragantia, 68, 807-815. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0006-87052009000300030</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88349-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pinê, R.E.L., Pinheiro, R.S.B., Chadouteaud, L.M.L. and Américo, G.H.P. (2014) Mudan&amp;#231;as climáticas: O efeito estufa e a produ&amp;#231;&amp;#227;o agrícola. Revista Científica, ANAP Brasil, 7, 51-61.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88349-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Coltri, P.P., Alfonsi, W.M.V., Vanucci, A.L., Gon&amp;#231;alves, R.R.V. and Zullo Júnior, P. (2015) Simula&amp;#231;&amp;#227;o de temperatura e umidade relativa do café arábica em sistemas arborizados e a pleno sol. In: Simpósio de Pesquisa dos Cafés do Brasil, Embrapa Café, Brasília, 6 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88349-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Companhia nacional de abastecimento (2015) Acompanhamento da safra brasileira: Café. http://www.conab.gov.br</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88349-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">ávila, L.F., Mello, C.R., Yanagi, S.N.M. and Neto, O.B.S. (2014) Tendências de temperaturas mínimas e máximas do ar no Estado de Minas Gerais. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 49, 247-256. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2014000400002</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>