1. Introduction

AJPS

American Journal of Plant Sciences

2158-2742

Scientific Research Publishing

10.4236/ajps.2018.911163

AJPS-88029

Articles

Biomedical&Life Sciences

Expression of a Rice Chitinase Gene Enhances Antifungal Response in Transgenic Litchi (cv. Bedana)

Dilip

Kumar Das

¹^*Amir

Rahman

Post Graduate Department of Biotechnology, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur, India

11102018

09112256227525, August 201823, October 2018 26, October 2018

2014

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

To enhance the antifungal response of litchi, transferring rice chitinase gene under a maize-ubiquitin promoter along with its first intron into the zygotic embryos via Agrobacterium tumefaciens -mediated transformation generated transgenic plants. After co-cultivation for 2 days with recombinant Agrobacterium , zygotic embryos were transferred onto Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium consisted of MS salts and Gamborg (B5) vitamins with 2 mgl ^- ¹ 2, 4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2, 4-D), 50 gl ^- ¹ sucrose and 8 gl ^- ¹ agar supplemented with 25 mgl ^- ¹ hygromycin and 400 mgl ^- ¹ cefotaxime. Embryos were selected passing through a series of MS modified media and the antibiotic resistant transgenic plantlets were analyzed. The integration and stability of the transgene was confirmed by PCR, RT-PCR, Southern blotting and by Western blot analyses. The transgenic plants exhibited higher chitinase activity than the non-transformed plants. The chitinase activity was also examined using the native polyacrylamide in-gel assay. These analyses indicated that the foreign gene was translated into the protein of expected molecular weight that showed chitinase activity. Following in-vitro inoculation of die-back, leaf spots and blight pathogen ( Phomopsis sp .), the transgenic plants showed delayed onset of the disease and smaller lesions. The transgenic plants were adapted to the greenhouse and did not show any phenotypic alterations.

Transgenic Litchi Agrobacterium Tumefaciens Blight Die Back and Leaf Spots Phomopsis sp. Somatic Embryogenesis Transformation

1. Introduction

Litchi plants are cultivated commercially worldwide and India became second to China in lychee production, total plantings covering about 30,000 acres. There are also extensive plantings in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Burma, former Indochina, Taiwan, Japan, the Philippines, Queensland, Madagascar, Brazil and South Africa. It is economically important global fruit crop and is used in producing juice, wine, Jam, table litchi, dried fruit and fresh fruit. It contains Protein (0.68 - 1.0 g), Fat (0.3 - 0.58 g), Carbohydrate (13.31 - 16.4 g), Fiber (0.23 - 0.4 g), Calcium (8 - 10 mg) and organic compounds such as Thiamine (28 mg), Nicotinic acid (0.4 mg), Riboflavin (0.05 mg) and Ascorbic acid (24 - 60 mg)/100 g of edible portion [1] . In India it is grown in three distinct agro-climatic zones i.e. sub-tropical, hot tropical and mild tropical climatic regions. Major litchi varieties produced in India are Purbi, Early and Late Bedana, Kashba, Shahi, China, Deshi, Dehra Rose, Longia etc. However, it is susceptible to an array of diseases. Fungal diseases, which cause extensive loss in yield and quality, have been the most serious problems for cultivation. The most important among them are die-back, leaf spots and leaf blight caused by Phomopsis sp. and only leaf blight by Gleosporium sp. respectively [2] . Indian litchi cultivars are mostly threatened by these two pathogens. In general, fungal infection decreases yield of fruits and their quality through a reduction in plant vitality and productivity or by direct infection of the fruit. Control is generally achieved by widespread application of fungicides. The economic costs and negative environmental impact associated with these applications have led to a recent search for alternative strategies, involving genetic manipulation of host defense mechanisms which offer a new perspective for introducing traits like disease resistance into the cultivars of Litchi chinensis.

Somatic embryogenesis and plantlet regeneration has been reported in litchi by culture of anthers [3] , immature embryos [4] protoplasts from embryogenic suspensions obtained from immature zygotic embryo [5] which is an important, most favored, efficient transformation and regeneration tool for gene transfer into litchi. The first transformation experiments with leaf tissue of litchi (L. chinensis Sonn.) expressed green fluorescent protein gene in transgenic calli, which failed to regenerate (Using an Agrobacterium-mediated transformation protocol, Puchooa 2004) [6] . Avocado transformation was reported by Litz & Witjaksono (2002) [7] , biotechnology of fruit and nut crops, biotechnology in Longan and litchi breeding [8] , in-vitro regeneration and transformation of Litchi [8] , somatic embryogenesis [9] and plant regeneration in tropical timber tree Spanish red cedar [10] , in Schiscandra chinensis [11] and in Trifolium [12] and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in Bixa. orellana L. [13] , in Sesame [14] , in Cotton [15] , in Cocoa [16] and in Zoysia [17] .

The gene transfer to litchi has been achieved till date by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation (Das et al., 1996, Puchooa, 2004) [6] [18] . Agrobacterium-mediated transformation has been most widely used and is compatible with both the production of cell suspension cultures and the regeneration of transgenic plants from a variety of litchi cultivars.

It has been revealed that plants have defense systems, which involve pathogen-related proteins, e.g. chitinase [19] [20] . Pathogenesis-related (PR) protein encoding genes when over-expressed in crop plants have been shown to enhance resistance to many fungal diseases [21] [22] . There are many reports in which rice chitinase gene conferred resistance against herbicide bialaphos in bread wheat [23] , resistance of rice against the Sheath Blight [24] , and enhanced resistance to Rhizoctonia solani in rice [25] and enhanced resistance to Fusarium sp. in Pigeon pea [26] and wheat endochitinase gene in tomato and enhanced resistance to Fusarium aslyspermum [27] . Yamamoto et al. (2000) [28] also reported the rice chitinase gene (RCC2), classified as class I chitinase, expressed in grapevine for enhanced resistance to fungal pathogen.

In this paper, we report on the use of Agrobacterium method to overexpress another rice chitinase gene (RCC11) in L. chinensis cv. Bedana. The transgenic plants that exhibited higher chitinase activity than non-transgenic plants showed increased resistance to die-back, leaf spot and blight.

2. Materials and Methods2.1. Plant Material

Immature litchi (L. chinensis Sonn.) fruits cv. Bedana were obtained from Horticulture Division, Bihar Agricultural College, Sabour, Bhagalpur, India after four weeks of anthesis, were washed in running tap water to free them from dust. Followed by these immature fruits were dipped into water mixed with 2 - 4 drops of tween 20 and remained there for 5 min. After that these fruits were taken out and again dipped into 0.1% HgCl₂ and remained there for 10 min. Followed by these processes fruits were rinsed thrice in sterile distilled water under aseptic conditions. These fruits’ walls were incised and zygotic embryos were isolated. These zygotic embryos were the materials for transformation experiments.

2.2. RCC11 Chitinase Gene Cloned into pCAMBIA Vector

In this study, the chitinase gene RCC11 from Oryza sativa X 54367, a nucleotide sequence of a rice genomic clone that encodes a class I endochitinase. Rice chitinase gene (RCC11) was cloned in pCAMBIA vector by Dr. S. Muthukrishnan, Kansas State University, USA.

2.3. Transformation of Litchi

Zygotic embryos of litchi (L. chinensis Sonn. cv. Bedana) were transformed as described by Das et al. (2002) incised and infected with Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain LBA4404 harboring the binary vector pCAMBIA (CaMV-Ubi-RCC11), which contained the chitinase-coding region (GenBank Acc. No. X54367) solution for 30 min. and remained in co-cultivation on MS basal medium in dark incubated at 28˚C. Following 2 days of co-cultivation in MS [29] basal medium, regeneration protocol (consists of different stages i.e. Zygotic embryos-calli-Protoplasts-somatic embryos-Plant) of Changhe Yu et al. (2000) [5] was followed and the zygotic embryos were sub-cultured in MS1 medium consisted of MS salts, B5 vitamin, 2 mgl⁻¹ 2, 4-D, 50 gl⁻¹ sucrose and 8 gl⁻¹ agar for 6 - 8 weeks maintained in darkness, incubated at 26˚C ± 1˚C and were sub-cultured in 2 weeks’ interval on fresh MS1 or MS2 (MS1 + STS 29.4 μM) medium. Embryogenic cultures, pale yellow and friable, appeared after 6 - 8 weeks. All cultured media were supplemented with an appropriate concentration of antibiotics i.e. 25 mgl⁻¹ hygromycin and 400 mg l⁻¹ cefotaxime. Subsequently, the calli were transferred to MS2 liquid medium for cell suspension culture and were sub-cultured weekly in fresh MS2 liquid medium and remained there in darkness for 2 - 9 months.

Followed by protoplasts were isolated from harvested cells of suspension cultures. For this cells were centrifuged and plasmolysed in CPW medium contains (MgL⁻¹) KH₂PO₄ (27.2), KNO₃ (101), CaCl₂・2H₂O (1480), MgSO₄・7H₂O (240), KI (0.16), CuSO₄・5H₂O (0.025) pH 5.8 salts solution with 13% (w/v) mannitol for 1 h. The plasmolyticum was then removed and replaced by a filter-sterilized enzyme solution containing 0.8% (w/v) Cellulase “Onazuka” RS, 0.4% (w/v) Macerozyme R-10, 11% (w/v) mannitol and CPW salts (pH 5.8). The mixture was incubated on a rotary shaker (45 rpm), in darkness, at 26˚C ± 1˚C overnight. Digested cells were filtered through a 37 µm nylon sieve and centrifuged (100 g, 5 min). Protoplasts were washed three times with CPW salts solution plus 11% (w/v) mannitol. These protoplasts were purified by sedimentation and washing method.

Protoplasts were washed in calcium-free CPW solution and re-suspended in an autoclaved solution consisting of 1.8% (w/v) sodium alginate and 10% (w/v) mannitol. Re-suspended protoplasts (10⁵ ml⁻¹) were embedded in Ca-alginate by dropping 1 ml of the suspension from a borosilicate blood pipette into each Petri dish (60 × 15 mm) containing 1% (w/v) CaCl₂・2 H₂O and CPW salts. After 1 h at 26˚C ± 1˚C, many Calcium alginate beads were formed which were washed in sterile distilled water. These beads were cultured on P11 liquid medium consisted of major salts of KM 8P medium (NH₄NO₃ 600, KNO₃ 1900, CaCl₂・2H₂O 600, MgSO₄・7H₂O 300, KH₂PO₄ 170, KCl 300 MgL⁻¹), minor salts, iron and vitamins of MS basal medium 1 MgL⁻¹ 2,4-D, 0.2 mgl⁻¹ NAA, 250 mgl⁻¹ glutamine, 0.5 mgl⁻¹ Zeatin, 200 MgL⁻¹ coconut water (the source of coconut water is unripe green coconut fruit), 0.45 M glucose and 0.1 M Sucrose in dark at 26˚C ± 1˚C. After 6 weeks Calcium alginate beads were cultured on liberating medium consisted of MS with 8% (w/v) sucrose and 0.1 M citric acid at pH 5.8. Cultures were incubated on a rotary shaker (75 rpm) for 30 min. Liberated protoplast-derived colonies were collected by centrifugation (100 g, 5 min) and then transferred to B3MS medium consisted of MS salts and B5 vitamins with 1 mgl⁻¹ kinetin, 0.1 mgl⁻¹ NAA, 500 mgl⁻¹ glutamine, 8% (w/v) sucrose, and 15 gl⁻¹ agar (pH 6.2). Subculture was carried out at 2-week intervals. Somatic embryos (2 mm or longer) were transferred to a maturation medium B4MS consisted of MS salts and B5 vitamin with 500 mgl⁻¹ glutamine, 50 ml l⁻¹coconut water, 5% (w/v) sucrose, 9 gl⁻¹ agar (pH 5.8). After 4 - 8 weeks on B4MS medium, somatic embryos were transferred and germinated on B5MS medium consisted of MS salts and B5 vitamins with 1 MgL⁻¹ kinetin, 5 mg l⁻¹ GA₃, 50 ml l⁻¹ coconut water, 35 (w/v) sucrose, and 7 g l⁻¹ agar (pH 5.8) with a photoperiod of 16 h and light intensity 80 μmol m⁻² s⁻¹). Shoot elongation, proliferation, rooting and subsequent plantlet development were induced on half concentration of WPM medium consisted of (gl⁻¹) WPM salts mixture (2.3), Sucrose (30), 100 × Vitamin stock (1 ml), 20 × Fe-EDTA (5 ml), myoinositol (0.1) supplemented with BAP 0.25 μM + NAA 0.1 µM). Rooted plantlets were further acclimatized in vermiculite moistened with Hoagland [30] nutritive solution and finally transferred into garden soil and grown in green house.

Southern blot analysis: In order to confirm the transgene integration and to determine the number of copies of transgene (RCC11) integrated, Southern blotting [31] experiments were performed. Genomic DNA (10 µg) and plasmid as positive control were digested with PstI or SacII (New England Biolab); fragments were separated on 1% (w/v) agarose gels at 25 V for 16 h. The fractionated DNA was denatured with 0.5 M NaOH for 30 min, neutralized with 25 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.5 and transferred onto positively-charged nylon membranes (Hybond N+, Amersham Biosciences, Hongkong). The transferred DNA was fixed to the membrane by baking at 80˚C for 30 min followed by UV irradiation (12 × 10⁴ µJ cm⁻²) using a UV cross-linker (UV-Stratalinker 1800, USA). Blots were hybridized with [α-³²P] dCTP-labelled PCR-derived RCC11 or hpt genes as a probe using random primers labeling kit (New England Biolab) and detection were made by autoradiography carried out on Kodak Xomat x-ray film (Kodak) for 1d.

Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis: Total RNA was prepared from leaf tissues using Trizol Reagent as per the manufacturer’s instructions (Trizol Reagent, Invitrogen life technologies, San Diego, California, USA). To detect the presence of rice chitinase mRNA transcripts in transformants, RT-PCR was carried out on 5 µL of this RT product using RCC11gene specific primers at 52˚C (F5’TCTCCT TCAAGACGGCGTTCTGGTTC3’; R5’CTGGTTGTAGCAATCCAGGTTATC G-3’) and cycle parameter was kept as mentioned in the section earlier to amplify 290-bp of rice chitinase. Untransformed plants cDNA was used as experimental control.

Biochemical analysis: The chitinase levels in transgenic litchi were determined using colorimetric enzyme assay, in-gel assay and western blot analysis. Total soluble proteins were extracted from frozen leaves (placed at −80˚C for a week) of the transformed and non-transformed samples. Leaves were homogenized with a pestle and mortar in liquid nitrogen and the frozen powder was suspended in 5 volumes of 0.1 M sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0) containing 20 mM sodium ascorbate and polyclar AT. After two rounds of centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 15 min at 4˚C, the supernatants were recovered [28] . The protein concentrations in the extracts were estimated by the Bradford method [32] . Equal amount (25 µg) of soluble proteins were loaded 1D SDS-gels and stained with 0.1% Coomassie brilliant blue R-250 (dissolved in 25% methanol & 10% acetic acid mixture for 20 min) dye to ensure the equal loading of protein and de-stained in 10% acetic acid overnight and proceeded for western blotting by transferring proteins on to the nitrocellulose membrane and probed with anti-chitinase11 antibodies (Generously provided by Dr.M.V.Razam, Deptt. of Genetics, South Campus, University of Delhi, India) at 1:5000 dilution. The specific position of antigen-antibody complex on the membrane was visualized by using alkaline phosphatase linked to secondary antibodies and for in-gel assay-Chitinases isoforms were visualized by glycol chitin SDS-PAGE. The extract containing 70 - 100 µg of soluble protein from different transgenic lines as well as the untransformed control were diluted 1:10 and subjected to SDS-PAGE with 5% stacking gels and 12% acrylamide resolving gels [33] incorporated with 0.01% glycol chitin as described by Trudel and Asselin [34] . Glycol chitin was prepared by acetylation of glycol chitosan, where 1 g of glycol chitosan (G-7753, Sigma, USA) was dissolved in 20 ml of 10% acetic acid and the viscous solution was mixed and kept overnight at room temperature, and then 90 ml methanol were added and mixed continuously. The solution was filtered through Whatman filter paper (No. 3) under vacuum. The resulting filtrate was mixed with 1.5 ml acetate anhydride. The formed gel was kept at room temperature for 30 min, the excessive liquid was poured off, and the gel was cut into small slices and homogenized by homogenizer. The homogenate was centrifuged at room temperature at 30,000 rpm for 15 min; the pellet was re-suspended in 100 ml of double distilled water so that the final concentration of this stock is 1%. After the electrophoresis, the gel was incubated with Triton X-100 solution, consisting of 0.1 M NaOAc (pH 5.0) and 1% Triton X-100, at 37˚C for 2 h. The resultant gel was then stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 for 1 h and de-stained with double distilled water for overnight. Gels were photographed with a Kodak digital camera and contrast was enhanced using Adobe Photoshop version (7.0) software.

Quantitative assay of Chitinase enzyme activity: A solubilized, ethylene glycol-chitin (Sigma-Aldrich) was used as a substrate for chitinase activity assay. The colorimetric analysis of chitinase enzyme activity of PCR, Southern and RT-PCR positive transgenic plants was done following the protocol of Stephan and Wolf (1990) with slight modifications in triplicate, where aliquots of 300 µl of ethylene glycol-chitin (stock 2 mg/ml) were mixed with 100 µl of 200 mM sodium acetate buffer, pH 5.0 and 0.5 ml enzyme solution, then incubated for 60 min. at 37˚C in circulating water bath. The reaction was terminated by the addition of 100 µl HCl (1.0 N) on ice and incubated for 10 min. to facilitate precipitation of the non-degraded substrate (chitin), was centrifuged at 14,000 g for 5 min. The resulting N-acetyl glucosamine (GlcNAc) residues were colorimetrically measured by the dinitrosalicylic acid (DNSA) method [35] ). To 1 ml of the reaction mixture, 1 ml of DNSA was added and boiled for 10 min. and then 0.4 ml of Potassium-Sodium tartarate was added. The mixture was cooled at room temperature and OD (optical density) was taken at 540 nm. As appropriate controls enzyme and substrate blanks were included in the experiment. One unit was defined as the amount of enzyme that produced 1 µmol of reducing sugars corresponding to N-acetyl-D-glucosamine in 1 min.

Pathogenicity test against die-back, leaf spots and blight: We evaluated the potential of tolerance of transgenic litchi transformed with RCC11 to die-back, leaf spots and blight caused by Phomopsis sp. newly developing fifth or sixth matured fresh leaves in situ were punctured with needle and sprayed of thin film of spore solution of Phomopsis sp. for infection in moist condition (RH 80%) and then detached after four to seven days and punctured again with needle for infection with spore solution from the in-vitro grown transgenic plants. Two leaves from each transgenic plant were placed adaxial side up onto 0.6% (w/v) agar containing 40 mgl⁻¹ benzodiazoloe in a petri dish. As a control, leaves were taken from in-vitro grown non-transformed plants and were treated in same way as transgenic plant. P. sp. is an endophytic wound parasite and it can be cultured on Potato dextrose agar medium. The spores were collected either by washing die-back, leaf spots and blight infected leaves from Horticulture department, Bihar Agricultural College, Sabour, Bhagalpur in distilled water containing 0.01% (v/v) Tween 20 or from P. sp. growing in culture medium. The spore suspension of Phomopsis sp. (0.5 ml) with concentration (1.0 was sprayed on to each petri dish containing leaf and kept at saturated humidity at 25˚C. The degree of disease severity was scored using a visual assessment scale based on the size and characteristics of necrotic lesions. A 5-point disease rating scale based on the approximate percentage of leaf necrotic area after 15 - 28 days of inoculation (1 = 0%; 2 = 1% - 20%; 2 = 20% - 30%; 3 = 30% - 40%; 4 = 40% - 50%; 5 = >50%) (Yamamoto et al., 2000; Jayaraj and Punja, 2007) [28] [36] was employed. We also recorded the number of days required for the onset and complete chlorosis in each leaf in comparison to control. The diseased leaves of untransformed and non diseased leaves of transformed plants were digitally photographed. A separate portion of leaves of both non-transgenic and transgenic plants was electron micrographed.

Electron micrography: For surface ultra structure study under scanning electron microscope (SEM), small (1 - 8 mm) leaves of both transgenic and non-transgenic litchi plants were punctured and infected in same manner as mentioned above as a specimen normally required being completely dry, since the specimen chamber was at high vacuum. Chemical fixation is required to preserve the specimen. Fixation of the litchi leaves was performed by incubation in a solution of a buffered chemical fixative, such as 2.5% glutaraldehyde in combination with 2% formaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer at pH 7.2 containing 0.03 M sucrose for overnight at 4˚C and it was subsequently washed in 0.1 M phosphate buffered with 0.3 M sucrose for 1h for twice change. The samples were then dehydrated in an acetone series (30% - 100%). After dehydration, critical point drying and coating with gold, the observation behavior of Phomopsis sp. was carried out with a SEM model-Leo 435 VP Leica, Cambridge (UK) at 20 KV. Each disease value was taken on averages of three experiments. In each experiment 6 detached leaves for disease value was taken in each petridish and three petridishes for each treatment and disease rating scale was based on the approximate percentage of leaf necrotic area after 15 - 28 days of inoculation. The percentage response of disease rating scale was different in different litchi plant’s leaves i.e. 4.7 in non-transgenic and 4.6 to 1.3 in transgenic plants and full necrosis of leaves was observed in 69 days. The statistical significance on disease value was calculated by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison tests. All data analyses were performed using the Graph Pad software (Graph Pad in Stat. Software Inc. San Diego, CA 92130, USA).

3. Results

RCC11 chitinase gene cloned into pCAMBIA vector: Class I chitinases are generally basic and contain a cysteine-rich N-terminal domain with putative chitin-binding properties. They are usually localized to the vacuole and are potent inhibitors of many fungi, which have an open reading frame of 956 bp and consist of 308 amino acids with an ATG start codon. A total of 70% GC content with a molecular weight of the mature protein of 35 kDa was used earlier to increase the degree of tolerance of grapevine against fungal (Uncinula necator) pathogen. It was observed that RCC11 gene encodes chitinase enzyme which possibly dissolves chitinase wall of fungus for disease recovery and confers enhanced resistance to fungal pathogen Phomopsis sp. in litchi.

Transformation of litchi with the rice chitinase gene: Zygotic embryos were transformed by infecting incised embryos surface with the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain LBA4404 containing the binary vector pCAMBIA1301-RCC11 (Figure 1). The proembryogenic callus, which was developed from zygotic embryos upon transfer from MS1 to MS2 semi-solid culture, forms friable embryogenic cultures composed of proembryogenic mass (PEMS) because STS helps in formation of friable callus by suppression of somatic embryo development (Figures 2(a)-(d)). These embryogenic calli when transferred to MS2 liquid medium formed a large number of PEMS round densely cytoplasmic cells in suspension in long duration i.e. 2 - 9 months (Figure 2(e)). It was observed that alternate liquid-solid subculture was critical for maintaining suspension culture of high quality otherwise in long duration of suspension culture, PEMS would not survive.

Protoplasts isolated from suspension cultures were highly cytoplasmic, uniform in size and contained many starch grains. The yield and viability of protoplasts was approximately 1 × 10⁷ per g fresh weight and 92%, respectively. Embedding of average density 15 - 20 protoplasts/cm³ in calcium alginate support cell division in 16 h after plating (but in control, without alginate, protoplasts aggregate on 2^nd day and divided on plating) and direct formation of proembryos in calcium alginate beads (Figure 2(f)). P11 medium gave the best results, with 7% of protoplasts dividing normally once or twice. Two to four-celled proembryos or microcalli were observed in 4 days after protoplast culture initiation (Figures 2(g)-(i)). Microcalli and putatively transformed globular embryos were formed at a total combined frequency of 56% and were visible to the naked eye 6 weeks after plating. When the Ca-alginate beads were liquefied in citric acid buffer medium, all microcalli and globular embryos were come out. Released colonies were harvested and transferred onto B3MS medium (Figure 2(j)). In this medium somatic embryos were differentiated and developed from protoplast-derived cultures in 2, 4-D-free medium (Figure 2(k) and Figure 2(l)). After 4 weeks, somatic embryos (2 - 4 mm long) appeared in large numbers and most of them were white. To stimulate this further maturity, somatic embryos were transferred onto B4MS medium and incubated in darkness for another 4 or 8 weeks. Eight weeks culture was more favorable for shoot formation. Now these putatively transformed matured embryos were cultured on B5MS medium under 16 h photoperiod incubated at 26˚C ± 1˚C (Figure 2(m)). These somatic embryos were germinated and formed both shoots and roots (Figure 2(n) and Figure 2(o)). The overall frequency of plantlet regeneration through the steps of embryo germination on the same medium was 20.9% (18 plantlets/86 embryos). Under these conditions we were able to block necrogenesis following of Agrobacterium co-cultivation. The stable transformed embryos were selected by periodic increase in hygromycin concentration. Initially after 20 days on medium containing 10 MgL⁻¹ hygromycin, a high number of germinated somatic embryos were obtained. When transferred to medium containing higher concentrations of the antibiotic (15, 20 MgL⁻¹), many of the regenerants became yellowish, and were discarded after 50 days.

Of the germinating hygromycin resistant transgenic embryos, about 20% showed normal shoot and root development compared to a conversion frequency of 67% in the control plantlets. Nine regenerated lines (B-Chi-1, 2, 4, 5, 9, 10, 14, 15 and 18) were used for further analyses. Each transgenic line was derived from a single somatic embryo and grew on hygromycin-containing media. The putative transgenic plants had no phenotypic abnormalities in comparison to the untransformed control plants. The main hurdle for litchi explants i.e. zygotic embryos that just after incision a large amount of polyphenolics were secreted

which upon the action of polyphenoloxidase turned brown (due to melanin pigment) and cells were dead and unable to proliferate in-vitro condition. We controlled browning by the use of anti-oxidants (Ascorbic acid (AA) and citric acid (CA) which inhibited the action of polyphenol oxidase) and then incised zygotic embryos were cultured on MS 1 medium supplemented with AA + CA (250 mgl⁻¹) in the medium so that zygotic embryos formed proliferated calli under in-vitro conditions without showing necrosis.

Molecular and biochemical characterization of transgenic plants: The introgression of foreign genes and copy number pattern of integrated transgene in the nuclear genome of the PCR positive transgenic lines was confirmed by Southern hybridization. The genomic DNA (5 µg) was digested with PstI restriction endonuclease enzyme in order to release the RCC11 cDNA-terminator cassette (~1.1 kb). The blot was probed with ³²P-dCTP labeled RCC11 cDNA. In all the five transgenic lines analyzed, the expected ~1.1 kb band lighted up at the position corresponding to the chitinase gene within their genome while it was absent in the untransformed control plant. Genomic DNA was also digested with SacII, which has single recognition site on the T-DNA region to determine the number of integration events and probed with ³²P-dCTP labeled hpt gene fragment. Single bands were seen in all the transgenic lines confirming the single copy integration in all five lines (Figure 3).

We used RT-PCR analysis to check the expression of RCC11 gene. In order to study the expression of mRNA for RCC11 gene, total RNA was taken and RT-PCR analysis was performed from all five PCR positive lines using primers specific for the mRNA sequence of RCC11. A 290-bp amplified fragment of mRNA corresponding to the RCC11 transcript confirmed the expression of the rice chitinase gene. No amplification was observed in RNA samples isolated from un-transformed plant. RT-PCR results of all five independent transgenic lines (B-Chi 1, 4, 9, 15 and 18) are shown in Figure 4.

In-gel assay analysis showed number of chitinase isoforms from crude protein of transformed and untransformed plants separated by SDS-PAGE as shown in Figure 5. Untransformed protein extract displayed chitinase isoforms of molecular weights at 21 and 30 kDa. But an additional isoform of 35 kDa was seen only in transformed lines.

Western blot analysis of representative lines employing polyclonal antibodies raised against rice chitinase11 showed presence of a single prominent band corresponding to the size of 35 kDa i.e. the expected size, indicating that the transgene is being expressed constitutively at a higher rate (Figure 6).

Higher chitinase activity was detected in all transgenic plants expressing the RCC11 gene investigated (chi4, chi9, chi15 and chi18) than in the non-transgenic plant. Lines 4 and 15 showed approximately two and three fold increase in the enzyme activity than non-transgenic plants, while lines 9 and 18 showed approximately one and half fold increase in the activity (Figure 6).

Evaluation of die-back, leaf spots and blight resistance in transgenic plants: Detached leaves of transgenic plants were tested for resistance to the phytopathogenic fungus, Phomopsis sp. Both Chi-4 and Chi-15 lines showed disease rating scores of 1.6 and 1.3 as an average score of three experiments, respectively, versus a score of 4.7 for the non-transformant (Table 1). These results indicate that the two transformants exhibited full resistance to Phomopsis sp., which was sufficient to delay the spread of lesion areas from the disease. The degree of disease symptoms correlated well with the level of chitinase enzyme accumulation. That is, the transgenic plants with a higher level of chitinase activity tended to have a smaller total lesion area. We also recorded the number of days required for the onset of necrosis. Since the leaves used for the experiment were similar in leaf position and size, we also recorded the number of days required for the complete necrosis in each leaf. The results are shown in Table 1. Similar to the result of disease index, both Chi-4 and Chi-15 lines took longer period than the control for the development of necrosis (Figures 7(a)-(c)). Electron micrograph studies showed that pathogenic fungal spores could easily germinate, ramify mycelium and also invade on leaf surface cells of non-transgenic litchi plants so that they developed die-back, leaf spots and blight disease in in-vitro grown plants but pathogenic spores were unable to germinate, ramify and invade the transgenic plants so that there was no development of disease (Figure 7(e)).

4. Discussion

It has previously been reported that several plant species expressing the rice chitinase gene conferred an enhanced resistance to fungal disease, i.e., resistance of rice against the Sheath Blight [36] (Lin et al., 1995), transgenic indica rice variety Pusa Basmati1 exhibits enhanced resistance to Rhizoctonia solani [25] and genetically transformed Pigeon pea for enhanced resistance to Fusarium sp. causing the wilt disease [26] and transgenic taro resistance against Sclerotium rolfsii [37] . Here, we present another illustration of enhanced resistance to die-back, leaf spots and blight in transgenic litchi. The present study shows that zygotic embryos derived embryogenic calli could be transformed by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation harboring the binary vector pCAMBIA-RCC11.

Table 1 Tolerant potential of transgenic litchi plants to die-back leaf spots and blight and number of days required for onset of disease and the complete leaf necrosis on detached leaves from RCC11 transgenic lines

No. of lines	Disease rating scales for die-back^a, leaf spots and blight	First symptom (days)	Fully covered (days)
B-Chi-1	4.6 ± 0.52^b	6	19
B-Chi-4	1.6 ± 0.55	39	64
B-Chi-9	3.5 ± 0.46	6	18
B-Chi-15	1.3 ± 0.58	45	69
B-Chi-18	4.2 ± 0.49	7	20
Non-transformed	4.7 ± 0.51	3	14

^a0, no symptoms; 5, very severe symptoms, ^bmean SD (±) of disease rating scales.

These results demonstrated that zygotic embryos are well suited as target material for Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation in litchi. The transformation process via Agrobacterium inoculation can cause necrosis; cell death of the tissue which could be reduced by special treatments [38] . Stress response may involve release of polyphenol from the vacuole [39] as well as de novo phenol synthesis [40] causing browning. We controlled browning of the tissue by the combined action of antioxidants i.e. Ascorbic and citric acids in the medium for in-vitro cell proliferation could be due to inhibitory effect on the polyphenol oxidase activity as reported earlier by Toth et al. 1993. Using the procedure of Changhe Yu et al. 2000 [5] , the overall transformants frequency were 20.9% (18 plantlets/86 embryos) of hygromycin resistant plantlets regenerated through the steps of embryo germination, shoot formation and rooting could be achieved. It is known that genotype and developmental stage as well as endogenous growth regulators affects the response of explants to regeneration.

Molecular analyses involving PCR and southern blotting indicate the integration of T-DNA into the litchi genome. Four transformants (chi-4, 9, 15 and 18) were positive in Southern when probed with pCAMBIA-CaMV-Ubi-RCC11) gene sequences. Presence of a single band in the southern blotting experiments with DNA digested with SacII, probed with the hpt gene sequences suggests single copy integration events. The difference detected using the two different restriction enzymes could be ascribed according to the restriction sites, where PstI releases the 1.1 kb gene cassette while SacII would cut once in the T-DNA region. Different sized bands among the transgenic lines indicate independent transformation events. The presence of rice chitinase gene transcripts in transgenic plants was demonstrated by RT-PCR analysis. Densitometry assessment gave the integrated density value (IDV) of each band. This shows that line Chi-15 has a higher IDV than the rest. The higher level of transcript possibly results in more chitinase activity.

Expression of the RCC11 by Western blotting clearly detected a specific signal for the rice chitinase in the transgenic plants. Transgenic line chi-15 showed an approximately two fold increase in the chitinase enzyme activity while the transgenic lines chi-4, 9 and 18 showed approximately one and half fold increase in the enzyme activity and this could be correlated well with the degree of resistance to the pathogens. Previous reports have also shown that elevated chitinase activity in transgenic strawberry [41] , tobacco [42] , rice [43] , and cotton (Emani et al. 2003).

Delays in the development of symptoms of fungal disease were also observed in these transgenic plants expressing an exogenous chitinase gene [28] [42] [43] . We also observed that the symptoms of die-back, leaf spots and blight gradually progressed even on detached leaves of transgenic plants that exhibited high chitinase activity, so that the transgenic and non transgenic plants were indistinguishable when culture of the infected leaves was prolonged (>18 days) as earlier reported by El-Eeeb et al. 2007, Kumaresan & Suryanarayanan 2002 and Prompattha et al. 2010 [44] [45] . The previous reports and the present study indicate that high expression of the chitinase gene confers improved tolerance to die-back, leaf spots and blight disease on litchi plants, although the enhanced resistance is full and quantitative in transgenic line 15. No somaclonal variation was observed in Chi 1, 4, 9, 15 & 18 transformants. Since litchi is a tropical tree species, highly heterozygous and long generation period (10 - 15 years) so heritability study for at least two generations (T₁ & T₂) is not possible because it will take long time (20 - 30 years).

In the present study, we used the in-vitro inoculation method with detached leaves to evaluate the increased resistance against die-back, leaf spots and blight in transgenic plants (see Figures 7(a)-(d)). This method showed high accuracy for the detection of slight differences such as delay in the development of disease symptoms, in fully controlled conditions, between the original non-transgenic plant and primary transformants having the same genetic background.

5. In Conclusion

We demonstrate that the successful transformation of zygotic embryos derived somatic embryos of L. chinensis cv. Bedana and regenerated into rooted plants. Following the successful integration of the transferred rice chitinase gene into the litchi genome, the expression of transferred gene and their activity, showed an increased resistance to leaf die-back by in vitro inoculation on detached leaves. Our next step will be focused on the evaluation and further improvement of the resistance against various fungal pathogens under greenhouse and field conditions. Together, these findings suggest that the rice chitinase RCC11 gene could be utilized as a genetic source of disease resistance for breeding and improve crop species. This is the first report of transgenic Litchi and uses the introduction of the chitinase gene as an example of the application of the technology.

Acknowledgements

Authors are grateful to the University Grants Commission, Govt. of India, New Delhi for providing financial assistance. We are highly thankful to Dr. M. V. Razam, Department of Genetics, South Campus, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India, for providing rice chitinase 11 cDNA and antibody and Mr. S.C.B. Sharma, Advanced Instrumentation Research Facility, JNU, New Delhi for providing Electron micrography.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Cite this paper

Das, D.K. and Rahman, A. (2018) Expression of a Rice Chitinase Gene Enhances Antifungal Response in Transgenic Litchi (cv. Bedana). American Journal of Plant Sciences, 9, 2256-2275. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2018.911163

Abbreviations

B5―Gamborg et al. (1968): CPW salts. Frearson et al. (1973): 2, 4-D-2, 4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid: GA₃-gibberellic acid: HPT―hygromycin phospotransferase gene: IBA-indole3-butyric acid: MS―Murashige and Skoog (1962): NAA-α-naphthalene acetic: 8P―Kao and Michayluk (1975): STS―silver thiosulphate: SDS-PAGE-sodium dodecylsulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis: WPM―Lloyd and McCown (1980).

References1

Morton, J.F. (1987) Fruits of Warm Climates. J.F. Morton, Miami, 249-259.

Fu, L. and Tang, D. (1983) Introduction Pollen Plants of Litchi Tree (Litchi chinensis Sonn.). Acta Genetica Sinica, 10, 369-374.

Zhou, L.N., Kuang, Z.S., Ma, X.J., Chen, J.Q., Tang, X.J. and Ling, X (1993) Preliminary Studies on Culture of Immature Embryos and Embryogenesis of Somatic Cells of Litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.). Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 5, 14-15.

Yu, C.H., Chen, Z.G., Lu, L.X. and Lin, J.W. (2000) Somatic Embryogenesis and Plant Regeneration from Litchi Protoplasts Isolated from Embryogenic Suspensions. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 61, 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006446506041

Puchooa

,et al. (2004)Expression of Green Fluorescent Protein Gene in Litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) Tissues Journal of Applied Horticulture 6, 11-15.

Litz, R.E. and Witjaksono (2002) Avocado Transformation. In: Khachatourians, G., McHughern, A., Scorza, R., Nip, W.K. and Hui, Y.H., Eds., Transgenic Plants and Crops, Marcel Dekker, New York, 345-358.

Zheng, Q.F., Hu, G.B. and Chen, D.C. (2001) Biotechnology in Longan and Litchi Breeding: Applications and Prospects. Acta Horticulturae, 558, 143-148. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2001.558.19

Sarin, N.B. and Prasad, U.S. (2003) In Vitro Regeneration and Transformation of Litchi chinensis Sonn. In: Jaiwal, P.K. and Singh, R.P., Eds., Plant Genetic Engineering, Improvement of Major Vegetables and Fruit Crops, Vol. 6, SciTech Publishing, Houston, 211-222.

Yuri, J.P.-R., Israel, G.-S., Angel, H.-E., Alfredo, D.-H., Felipe, A.B.-P., et al. (2011) Induction of Somatic Embryogenesis and Plant Regeneration in the Tropical Timber Tree Spanish Red Cedar [Cedrata oderata L. (Mediaceae)]. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC), 105, 203-209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-010-9853-y

Chen, A., Yang, J., Niu, Y.D., et al. (2010) High Frequency Somatic Embryogenesis from Germinated Zygotic Embryos of Schisandra chinensis and Evaluation of the Effects of Medium, Strength Sucrose, GA3 and BA in on Somatic Embryo Development. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC), 102, 357-364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-010-9740-6

Konieczny, R., Pilarska, M., Tuleja, M. and Salai, T. (2010) Somatic Embryogenesis and Plant Regeneration in Zygotic Embryos of Trifolium nigrescens (Viv). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC), 100, 123-130.

Rangan, P., Akshatha, V., Parvatan, G. and Ravishankar, G.A. (2011) Somatic Embryogenesis and Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation in Bixa orellana L. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC), 105, 317-328.

Manju, Y., Darsana, C. and Manish S (2010) Agrobacterium tumefaciense-Mediated Transformation of Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC), 103, 377-386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-010-9791-8

Tanveer, K., Vanga, R. and Leelavathi, S. (2010) High-Frequency Regeneration via Somatic Embryogenesis of an Elite Recalcitrant Cotton Genotype (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and Efficient Agrobacterium Mediated Transformation. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC), 101, 323-330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-010-9691-y

Costa, M.G.C., Silva, T.E.R., Cidade, L.C., Alvim, F.C., Cascardo, J.C.M. and Costa, M.G.C. (2009) Studies on Genetic Transformation of Theobroma cacao L.: Evaluation of Different Polyamines and Antibiotics on Somatic Embryogenesis and the Efficiency of UidA Gene Transfer by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 99, 281-298.

Li, M., Li, H., Hu, X., Pan, X. and Niu, G. (2010) An Agrobacterium tumefaciens Mediated Transformation System Using Callus of Zoysia tenuifolia Willd ex Trin. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 102, 321-327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-010-9736-2

Das, D.K., Shiva Prakash, N. and Sarin, N.B. (1996) Regeneration and Transformation of Litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.). In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology—Plant, 32, 63A.

Legrand, M., Kauffmann, S., Geoffroy, P. and Fritig, B. (1987) Biological Function of Pathogenesis-Related Proteins: Four Tobacco Pathogenesis-Related Proteins Are Chitinases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States, 84, 6750-6754. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.84.19.6750

Nishizawa, Y. and Hibi, T. (1991) Rice Chitinase Gene: cDNA Cloning and Stress-Induced Expression. Plant Science, 76, 211-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9452(91)90143-V

Jayraj, J., Anand, A. and Muthukrishnan, S. (2004) Pathogenesis-Related Proteins and Their Roles in Resistance to Fungal Pathogen. In: Punja, Z.K., Ed., Fungal Disease Resistance in Plants-Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Genetic Engineering, Food Products Press (Haworth Press), New York, 139-178.

Punja, Z.K. (2006) Recent Developments towards Achieving Fungal Disease Resistance in Transgenic Plants. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 28, S298-S308. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060660609507387

Chen, W.B., Xu, X., Liang, G.H., Muthukrishnan, S., Chen, P.D., Liu, D.J. and Gill, B.S. (1998) Introduction and Constitutive Expression of a Rice Chitinase Gene in Bread Wheat Using Biolistic Bombardment and bar Gene as a Selectable Marker. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 97, 1296-1306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220051022

Lin, W., Anuratha, C.S., Datta, K., Potrykus, I., Muthukrishnan, S. and Datta, S.K. (1995) Genetic Engineering of Rice for Resistance to Sheath Blight. Bio/Technology 13, 685-691.

Sridevi, G., Sabapathi, N., Meena, P., Nandakumar, R., Samiyappan, R., Muthukrishnan, S. and Veluthambi, K. (2003) Transgenic Indica Rice Variety Pusa Basmati 1 Constitutively Expressing a Rice Chitinase Gene Exhibits Enhanced Resistance to Rhizoctonia solani. Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 12, 93-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03263168

Kumar, S.M., Kumar, B.K., Sharma, K.K. and Devi, P. (2004) Genetic Transformation of Pigeon Pea with Rice Chitinase Gene. Plant Breeding, 123, 485-489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2004.01028.x

Girhepuje, P.V. and Shinde, G.B. (2011) Transgenic Tomato Plants Expressing a Wheat Endochitin Gene Demonstrate Enhanced Resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. Sp. Lycopersici. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 105, 242-253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-010-9859-5

Yamamoto, T., Iketani, H., Ieki, H., Nishizawa, Y., Notsuka, K., Hibi, T., Hayashi, T. and Matsuta, N. (2000) Transgenic Grapevine Plants Expressing a Rice Chitinase with Enhanced Resistance to Fungal Pathogens. Plant Cell Reports, 19, 639-646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002999900174

Murashige, T. and Skoog, F. (1962) A Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bioassay with Tobacco Tissue Cultures. Physiology and Plants, 15, 472-497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x

Hoagland, D.R. and Arnon, D.I. (1950) The Water-Culture Method of Growing Plants without Soil. California Agricultural Experiment Station, Bull. No. 347, Berkely.

Southern, E.M. (1975) Detection of Specific Sequences among DNA Fragments Separated by Gel Electrophoresis. Journal of Molecular Biology, 98, 503-517. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(75)80083-0

Bradford, M.M. (1976) A Rapid and Sensitive Method for the Quantitation of Microgram Quantities of Protein Utilizing the Principle of Protein-Dye Binding. Analytical Biochemistry, 72, 248-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3

Laemmli, U.K. (1970) Cleavage of Structural Proteins during the Assembly of the Head of Bacteriophage T4. Nature, 227, 680-685. https://doi.org/10.1038/227680a0

Trudel, J. and Asselin, A. (1989) Detection of Chitinase Activity after Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis. Analytical Biochemistry, 178, 362-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(89)90653-2

Miller, G.L. (1959) Use of Dinitrosalicylic Acid Reagent for the Determination of Reducing Sugar. Analytical Chemistry, 31, 426-428. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60147a030

Jayaraj, J. and Punja, Z.K. (2007) Combined Expression of Chitinase and Lipid Transfer Protein Genes in Transgenic Carrot Plants Enhances Resistance to Foliar Fungal Pathogens. Plant Cell Reports, 26, 1539-1546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-007-0368-x

He, X., Miyasaka, S.C., Fitch, M.M., Moore, P.H. and Zhu, Y.J. (2008) Agrobacterium Mediated-Transformation of Taro (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott) with a Rice Chitinase Gene for Improved Tolerance to a Fungal Pathogen Sclerotium rolfsii. Plant Cell Reports, 27, 903-909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-008-0519-8

Perl, A., Lotan, O., Abu-abied, M. and Holland, D. (1996) Establishment of an Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation System for Grape (Vitis vinifera L.): The Role of Antioxidants during Grape-Agrobacterium Interactions. Nature Biotechnology, 14, 624-628. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0596-624

Lagrimi, L.M. (1992) Wound-Induced Deposition of Polyphenols in Transgenic Plants over Expressing Peroxidase. Plant Physiology, 96, 577-583. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.96.2.577

Hahlbrock, K. and Scheel, D. (1989) Physiology and Molecular Biology of Phenylpropanoid Metabolism. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 40, 347-369. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.002023

Asao, H., Nishizawa, Y., Arai, S., Sato, T., Hirai, M., Yoshida, K., Shinmyo, A. and Hibi, T. (1997) Enhanced Resistance against a Fungal Pathogen Sphaerotheca humuli in Transgenic Strawberry Expressing a Rice Chitinase Gene. Plant Biotechnology, 14, 145-149. https://doi.org/10.5511/plantbiotechnology.14.145

Broglie, K., Chet, I., Holliday, M., Cressman, R., Biddle, P., Knowlton, S., Mauvais, C.J. and Broglie, R. (1991) Transgenic Plants with Enhanced Resistance to the Fungal Pathogen Rhizoctonia solani. Science, 254, 1194-1197. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.254.5035.1194

Nishizawa, Y., Nishio, Z., Nakazono, K., Soma, M., Nakajima, E., Ugaki, M. and Hibi, T. (1999) Enhanced Resistance to Blast (Magnaporthe grisea) in Transgenic Japonica Rice by Constitutive Expression of Rice Chitinase. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 99, 383-390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220051248

El-Deeb, H.M., Lashin, S.M. and Arab, Y.A. (2007) Distribution and Pathogenesis of Date Palm Fungi in Egypt. Acta Horticulturae, 736, 421-429. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.736.39

Kumaresan, V. and Suryanarayanan, T.S. (2002) Endophyte Assemblages in Young, Mature and Senescent Leaves of Rhizophora apiculata: Evidence for the Role of Endophytes in Mangrove Litter Degradation. Fungal Diversity, 81-91.

Promputtha, I., Hyde, K.D., McKenzie, E.H.C., Peberdy, J.F. and Lumyong, S. (2010) Can Leaf Degrading Enzymes Provide Evidences That Endophytic Fungi Becoming Saprobes? Fungal Diversity, 41, 89-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-010-0024-6