<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">WJNST</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>World Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-6795</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/wjnst.2018.84015</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">WJNST-87902</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Engineering</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Assessment of Exposure Due to Technologically Enhanced Natural Radioactivity in Various Samples of Moroccan Building Materials
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bouchaib</surname><given-names>Kassi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Aziz</surname><given-names>Boukhair</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Khadija</surname><given-names>Azkour</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mohamed</surname><given-names>Fahad</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mohammed</surname><given-names>Benjelloun</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Abdel-Mjid</surname><given-names>Nourreddine</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Ministère de l’Intérieur, El Jadida, Morocco</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Regional Center of the Trades of Education and Training, El Jadida, Morocco</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Laboratory of Physics and Nuclear Techniques, Atomic and Molecular, Chouaib Doukkali University, El Jadida, Morocco</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Groupe RaMsEs, Institut Pluridisciplinaire Hubert Curien (IPHC), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>26</day><month>09</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>176</fpage><lpage>189</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>10,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2018</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>19,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2018</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>22,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2018</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p><html>
 <head></head>
 
  The aim of our present work is to measure the specific activities of the radionuclides 
  <sup>226</sup>Ra, 
  <sup>232</sup>Th, 
  <sup>40</sup>K and the exhalation rates in terms of area and mass of 
  <sup>222</sup>Rn in some samples of building materials commonly used in Morocco in order to evaluate the radiological risk caused by natural radioactivity. To this end, the analyses were carried out, using two nuclear techniques, namely high resolution gamma spectrometry and alpha dosimetry based on the use of LR115, on 50 samples collected from large commercial suppliers in Morocco. The results of these analyses show that the average specific activities of 
  <sup>226</sup>Ra, 
  <sup>232</sup>Th and 
  <sup>40</sup>K in these materials vary from 9 to 52 Bq/kg, 3 to 63 Bq/kg and 68 to 705 Bq/kg respectively. These activities remain within the permissible limits of 35 Bq/kg, 30 Bq/kg and 370 Bq/kg respectively, with the exception of a few samples of red brick, gray cement, ceramic and granite. The activity of the radium equivalent (
  <em>Ra</em>
  <sub><em>eq</em></sub>), the internal (
  <em>H</em>
  <sub><em>in</em></sub>) and external (
  <em>H</em>
  <sub><em>ex</em></sub>) hazard indices, the absorbed dose rate
  <img src="Edit_9582c2c3-612b-458e-931f-71fd591407da.bmp" alt="" />, the total annual effective dose 
  <img src="Edit_78d975d1-7855-41da-a82d-fc0a1c294e97.bmp" alt="" />, the excess lifetime cancer risk (ELCR) as well as volumic activities, exhalation rates in terms of area (
  <em>E</em>
  <sub><em>S</em></sub>) and mass (
  <em>E</em>
  <sub><em>M</em></sub>) are calculated for the samples analyzed in this work in order to assess the radiological risks resulting from the use of these materials in various construction activities. It seems that the values of these indices vary from 19 to 196 Bq/kg, 0.08 to 0.67, 0.05 to 0.53, 9 to 91 nGy/h, 0.05 to 0.56 mSv/y, 0.19 &#215; 10
  <sup>&amp;minus;3</sup> to 1.96 &#215; 10
  <sup>&amp;minus;3</sup>, 72 to 350 Bq/m3, 56 to 273 mBq
  &amp;sdot;m
  <sup>&amp;minus;2</sup>
  &amp;sdot;h
  <sup>&amp;minus;1</sup> and 3 to 15 mBq
  &amp;sdot;kg
  <sup>&amp;minus;1</sup>
  &amp;sdot;h
  <sup>&amp;minus;1</sup> respectively. The lowest values are identified for gypsum, while the highest are attributed to granite. All of the obtained results of these indices respect the permissible limits except for the Raeq in some granite samples, the ELCR index in all samples except gypsum and the radon volumic activity in some gray cement samples, ceramic and granite. As a result, the different types of building materials analyzed in our work do not present a health risk to the public and can be used in various construction activities, with the exception of a few samples of red brick, gray cement, ceramic and granite. The choice of the use of red brick, gray cement and ceramic should be monitored and adapted according to the criteria of the limitation of the doses whereas the use of the granite must be moderate in order to limit over time the health risk which increases with the duration of exposure of humans to these building materials.
 
</html></p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Building Materials</kwd><kwd> Natural Radioactivity</kwd><kwd> Radionuclide</kwd><kwd> Radon Exhalation Rate</kwd><kwd> Radium Equivalent</kwd><kwd> Annual Effective Dose</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Since 1970, indoor air quality has become a major preoccupation for public health, due in part to the time we spend indoors (on average 87%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref1">1</xref>] and the high diversity of the airborne contaminants found therein, biological, chemical and physical [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref2">2</xref>] . Building materials represent a continuous source of natural radiation because it is produced from rocks and soils that contain radioactivity at varying levels depending on their origins [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref4">4</xref>] . Radioactive exposure to building materials can be divided into internal and external exposure. This latter is due to gamma radiation from the different radionuclides of the three radioactive decay chains (<sup>238</sup>U, <sup>235</sup>U, <sup>232</sup>Th) and <sup>40</sup>K. Internal exposure is due to the inhalation of radon and its progeny. <sup>222</sup>Rn is now considered the main source of human exposure to natural radiation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref5">5</xref>] . It is a naturally occurring radioactive gas from the disintegration of <sup>226</sup>Ra, itself part of the <sup>238</sup>U disintegration chain. When disintegrating, radon emits alpha particles and generates solid progeny, which are also radioactive (polonium, bismuth, lead, etc.). These descendants continue to disintegrate and emit radiation, in particular of the α and β type. Once inhaled, it dissipates their energies into the surrounding lung tissue, thereby damaging the lung cells, and altering their atomic structure. In 1987, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) of the World Health Organization (WHO) recognized radon as a pulmonary carcinogen for humans [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>In Morocco, the building materials industry is currently experiencing significant growth. A growing demand means the creation or expansion of several production units (cement works, brickworks, etc.). In recent years, the building industry uses a raw material, large quantities of waste with a technologically enhanced natural radioactivity (coal ash, phosphogypses, etc.) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref8">8</xref>] . The use of these materials in building materials has economic advantages but may affect the doses received by humans inside buildings as has been demonstrated in various studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref11">11</xref>] . Hence, the knowledge of the natural radioactivity in buildings materials from the three radioactive decay chains (<sup>238</sup>U, <sup>235</sup>U, <sup>232</sup>Th) and <sup>40</sup>K, is necessary and important for the assessment of the radiological impact on the public and the environment. To evaluate the radiological impact of these materials on the population and the environment, and through these specific activities, we calculated several radiological risk indices, namely radium equivalent (Ra<sub>eq</sub>), internal (H<sub>in</sub>) and external (H<sub>ex</sub>) hazard indices, total annual effective dose (Ė<sub>tot</sub>) as well as the excess lifetime cancer risk (ELCR).</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Sample Preparation</title><p>The building materials samples to be analyzed are collected from large and important commercial suppliers in Morocco. As regards sand, samples are taken from seven different quarries in the Doukkala region. Before any analysis and to obtain homogeneous samples, these building materials are dried in an oven at 40˚C for 24 hours and then ground and sieved through a 100 μm mesh screen. The screened samples are packaged in radon-tight containers for at least 4 weeks to establish the secular equilibrium corresponding to seven half-lives of <sup>222</sup>Rn.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Spectroscopic Analysis</title><p>The measurement of the natural radioactivity in the prepared samples is carried out by gamma ray spectrometer using the Broad Energy Germanium detector (BEGe) at Pluridisciplinary Institute Hubert Curien in Strasbourg, France. It is a planar type Hyper-Pure Germanium HPGe detector associated with a set of electronic modules for shaping the pulses, amplifying and storing the pulses delivered during the passage of the gamma rays through the detector. Its energy measurement range is 30 to 3000 keV with a resolution of 0.633 keV to 122 keV and from 1.934 keV to 1332 keV [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><p>As regards the energy and efficiency calibration of the BEGe detector, a multi-energy certified standard is analyzed under the same conditions and geometry as the samples studied. This standard contains several γ-emitting radionuclides such as <sup>241</sup>Am (60 keV), <sup>109</sup>Cd (88 keV), <sup>57</sup>Co (122, 136 keV), <sup>139</sup>Ce (165 keV), <sup>51</sup>Cr (320 keV), <sup>113</sup>Sn (391 keV), <sup>85</sup>Sr (514 keV), <sup>137</sup>Cs (661 keV), <sup>88</sup>Y (898, 1836 keV) and<sup>60</sup>Co (1173, 1332 keV). Samples of building materials are packaged in SG50 geometry and counted for 172.800 seconds. The treatment of the amplitude spectra is carried out using automatic analysis software Genie 2000 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref12">12</xref>] allowing to give directly the mass activity of each radioelement present in the sample.</p><p>The volumetric activities and the exhalation rate in terms of area and mass of the radon in the prepared samples are carried out using the alpha dosimetry. For this purpose, several pieces of 2 &#215; 2 cm<sup>2</sup> of Solid State Nuclear Track Detector (SSNTD) LR115 type 2 non strippable, Kodak brand 12 &#181;m thick, are exposed in sealed cylindrical “cans” of 5.5 cm diameter and 9.5 cm height by 50 g of each sample of building materials. After two months of irradiation, the LR115 are chemically treated in a 2.5 N sodium hydroxide solution during 100 min at a temperature of 60˚C. The developed films are read using an optical microscope. The density of traces per unit area and per unit time in LR115 and the volume activity of radon A V R n are determined according to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref13">13</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussions</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Specific Activities</title><p>The specific activities of the radionuclides <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th and <sup>40</sup>K are calculated by gamma spectrometry, after establishment of the secular equilibrium, in the various samples of building materials using the following ratios of energies:</p><p>• <sup>214</sup>Pb (295 keV and 352 keV) and <sup>214</sup>Bi (609 keV, 1120 keV and 1764 keV) for <sup>226</sup>Ra;</p><p>• <sup>228</sup>Ac (911 keV and 969 keV) and <sup>212</sup>Pb (239 keV) for <sup>232</sup>Th;</p><p>• <sup>40</sup>K (1461 keV) from the emission intensity line 10.55%.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows the minimum, the maximum and the average specific activities of <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th and <sup>40</sup>K radionuclides measured in the different types of</p><p>building materials. It can be seen that the contribution of the activity of the <sup>40</sup>K is much greater than that contributed by the <sup>238</sup>U and the <sup>232</sup>Th. It should also be noted that the activity of <sup>232</sup>Th in each sample is less than that of <sup>226</sup>Ra except for the red brick, ceramic and granite samples.</p><p>From these values, it results that the low average specific activities are recorded in the gypsum for the radionuclides <sup>226</sup>Ra and <sup>232</sup>Th, and in the white cement for the <sup>40</sup>K with average activities of the order of 9 Bq/kg, 3 Bq/kg and 68 Bq/kg respectively. The highest average specific activities for the <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th and <sup>40</sup>K radionuclides are recorded in the granite and are respectively of the order of 52 Bq/kg, 63 Bq/kg and 705 Bq/kg. All the specific activities of the measured <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th and <sup>40</sup>K are within the permissible limits of 35 Bq/kg, 30 Bq/kg and 370 Bq/kg [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref4">4</xref>] , respectively, with the exception of a few samples of red brick, gray cement, ceramic and granite. Therefore, the choice of materials for building constructions should be monitored and adapted according to the criteria of the limitation of doses.</p><p>In <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, and for comparison with our results, the specific activities of natural radionuclides are grouped together in samples of building materials in Morocco and some other countries. Overall, the specific activities obtained in this study are comparable to those found in other countries, with the exception of a few activities that are remarkably higher than ours.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Radium Equivalent</title><p>Due to the non-uniform distribution of natural radionuclides in building material samples, the radiological index radium equivalent Ra<sub>eq</sub> is generally represented as the sum of the specific activities of <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th and <sup>40</sup>K based on the assumption that 10 Bq/Kg of <sup>226</sup>Ra, 7 Bq/kg of <sup>232</sup>Th and 130 Bq/kg of <sup>40</sup>K would produce the same dose rate of gamma radiation. This is the most widely used index for radiological risk assessment. It is calculated using the following equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref28">28</xref>] :</p><p>R a e q = A 226Ra + 1.43 A 232Th + 0.077 A 40K (1)</p><p>where A 226Ra , A 232Th and A 40K are the specific activities in (Bq/kg) of <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th and <sup>40</sup>K in the samples analyzed.</p><p>In <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>, the mean values of the radium equivalent Ra<sub>eq</sub> varying from 19 to 196 Bq/kg, which are still below the permissible limit of 370 Bq/kg [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref5">5</xref>] , are grouped together for the samples analyzed. We note that the lowest value is found in the gypsum, while the highest is in the granite.</p><p>From these results, we can consider that these building materials do not present a significant radiological hazard to the population and can be used in various construction activities. However, it should be noted that the Ra<sub>eq</sub> values vary considerably in the same type of building materials and may in some cases exceed the permissible limit. This is the case of granite where the maximum value of the equivalent radium Ra<sub>eq</sub> is of the order of 382 Bq/kg. The use of the latter in construction activities must be moderate.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison between the specific activities of building materials in a few countries</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Samples</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Country</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Specific activities (Bq/kg)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >References</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>226</sup>Ra<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>232</sup>Th<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>40</sup>K<sup> </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Gray Cement</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >European Union</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >216</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref14">14</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >China</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.7 &#177; 1.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 &#177; 0.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >181 &#177; 3.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref15">15</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Turkey</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.9 &#177; 18.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.4 &#177; 9.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >316.5 &#177; 88.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref16">16</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >South Korea</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.5 &#177; 1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.4 &#177; 1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >241 &#177; 6.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref17">17</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Morocco</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 &#177; 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 &#177; 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >238 &#177; 29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Present Work</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >White Cement</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Egypt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.45 &#177; 2.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.44 &#177; 1.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.09 &#177; 4.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref18">18</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Turkey</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.8 &#177; 5.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.3 &#177; 7.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.2 &#177; 31.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref16">16</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Qatar</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.9 &#177; 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.9 &#177; 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.9 &#177; 22.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref19">19</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Serbia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 &#177; 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 &#177; 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55 &#177; 37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref20">20</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Iraq</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.577 &#177; 0.865</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.74 &#177; 2.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.6 &#177; 4.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref21">21</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Morocco</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 &#177; 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 &#177; 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68 &#177; 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Present Work</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Gypsum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Saudi Arabia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.28 &#177; 4.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.2 &#177; 2.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88 &#177; 4.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref22">22</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Italy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 &#177; 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 &#177; 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 &#177; 43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref23">23</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Iran</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.1 &#177; 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2 &#177; 0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >116 &#177; 11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref24">24</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Morocco</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 &#177; 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 &#177; 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73 &#177; 9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Present Work</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Red brick</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Iran</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.0 &#177; 1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.2 &#177; 0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >851 &#177; 15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref24">24</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Albania</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.4 &#177; 6.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.2 &#177; 7.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >644.1 &#177; 64.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref25">25</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Egypt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.06 &#177; 2.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.11 &#177; 2.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >447.84 &#177; 10.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref18">18</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Morocco</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23 &#177; 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 &#177; 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >360 &#177; 41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Present Work</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Block</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Egypt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >288.5 &#177; 17.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.77 &#177; 15.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >909.5 &#177; 59.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref18">18</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Iran</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.7 &#177; 1.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0 &#177; 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >436 &#177; 14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref24">24</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Morocco</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27 &#177; 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23 &#177; 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >300 &#177; 37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Present Work</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Ceramic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Egypt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.12 &#177; 2.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.52 &#177; 2.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >682.6 &#177; 10.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref18">18</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Turkey</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.1 &#177; 2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.5 &#177; 3.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >459.1 &#177; 51.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref26">26</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Syria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.878 &#177; 1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.16 &#177; 3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >401 &#177; 14.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref21">21</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Morocco</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 &#177; 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 &#177; 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >340 &#177; 42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Present Work</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Marble</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Saudi Arabia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.7 &#177; 3.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.2 &#177; 1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64 &#177; 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref22">22</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Algeria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23 &#177; 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 &#177; 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >310 &#177; 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref27">27</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Morocco</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 &#177; 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 &#177; 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >154 &#177; 19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Present Work</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Granite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Saudi Arabia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23 &#177; 1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.0 &#177; 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >340 &#177; 6.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref22">22</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Turkey</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.5 &#177; 47.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.4 &#177; 53.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >915.3 &#177; 361.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref16">16</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Morocco</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52 &#177; 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63 &#177; 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >705 &#177; 84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Present Work</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Sand</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Turkey</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.8 &#177; 10.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.5 &#177; 11.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >471.4 &#177; 101.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref26">26</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Qatar</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.2 &#177; 0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.34 &#177; 0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >225.5 &#177; 6.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref19">19</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pakistan</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.5 &#177; 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.9 &#177; 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >519.6 &#177; 6.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref28">28</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Morocco</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 &#177; 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 &#177; 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >274 &#177; 47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Present Work</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Average values of radium equivalent, hazard indices, absorbed dose rate, annual effective dose and the excess lifetime cancer risk in the samples of building materials analyzed</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Samples</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ra<sub>eq</sub><sub> </sub> (Bq/kg)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >H<sub>in</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >H<sub>ex</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ḋ (nGy/h)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ė<sub>in</sub><sub> </sub> (mSv/y)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ė<sub>ex</sub><sub> </sub> (mSv/y)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ė<sub>tot</sub><sub> </sub> (mSv/y)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ELCR (&#215;10<sup>−3</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Graycement</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77 &#177; 7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.29 &#177; 0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21 &#177; 0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36 &#177; 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18 &#177; 0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04 &#177; 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18 &#177; 0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.77 &#177; 0.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gypsum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 &#177; 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08 &#177; 0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05 &#177; 0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 &#177; 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04 &#177; 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01 &#177; 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04 &#177; 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19 &#177; 0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Whitecement</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62 &#177; 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23 &#177; 0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17 &#177; 0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 &#177; 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14 &#177; 0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03 &#177; 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14 &#177; 0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60 &#177; 0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Red brick</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82 &#177; 12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28 &#177; 0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22 &#177; 0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39 &#177; 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19 &#177; 0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05 &#177; 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19 &#177; 0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.83 &#177; 0.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Block</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82 &#177; 11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.30 &#177; 0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22 &#177; 0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39 &#177; 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19 &#177; 0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05 &#177; 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19 &#177; 0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.83 &#177; 0.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ceramic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97 &#177; 14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.34 &#177; 0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26 &#177; 0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45 &#177; 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22 &#177; 0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06 &#177; 0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22 &#177; 0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.97 &#177; 0.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Marble</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45 &#177; 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17 &#177; 0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12 &#177; 0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 &#177; 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10 &#177; 0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03 &#177; 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10 &#177; 0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45 &#177; 0.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Granite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >196 &#177; 17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.67 &#177; 0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.53 &#177; 0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91 &#177; 7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45 &#177; 0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11 &#177; 0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45 &#177; 0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.96 &#177; 0.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sand</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72 &#177; 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26 &#177; 0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20 &#177; 0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34 &#177; 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17 &#177; 0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04 &#177; 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17 &#177; 0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.73 &#177; 0.07</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Internal and External Hazard Indices</title><p>The calculation of the total activity of radionuclides in building materials alone does not make it possible to assess the radiological risks of gamma radiation. Other risk indices are also taken into account and are defined by a model taking into account the maximum activity of Ra<sub>eq</sub> (370 Bq/kg). The external hazard index H<sub>ex</sub> is defined by the following equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref28">28</xref>] :</p><p>H e x = A 226Ra 370 + A 232Th 259 + A 40K 4810 (2)</p><p>In addition to this external hazard, the respiratory organs are threatened because of the decay of <sup>226</sup>Ra into <sup>222</sup>Rn and its descendants. To account for this threat, the maximum permissible activity for <sup>226</sup>Ra is therefore reduced by half (185 Bq/kg). This internal hazard H<sub>in</sub> is quantified by the following relation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref28">28</xref>] :</p><p>H i n = A 226Ra 185 + A 232Th 259 + A 40K 4810 (3)</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> gives the internal and external hazard indices of the samples of the building materials studied. The values of the internal hazard index according to the materials vary between 0.08 and 0.67 while for the external hazard index they are between 0.05 and 0.53. The values are maximum for granite and minimum for gypsum. None of these values exceeds the unit, the maximum value of the internal (H<sub>in</sub>) and external (H<sub>ex</sub>) hazard indices allowed.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Absorbed Dose Rate and Annual Effective Dose</title><p>The absorbed dose rate Ḋ (nGy/h) due to the specific activity of natural radionuclides from building materials in air at 1 m height is defined by the following equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref5">5</xref>] :</p><p>D ˙ ( nGy / h ) = 0.462 A 226 Ra + 0.604 A 232 Th + 0.0417 A 40 K (4)</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> summarizes the results of the absorbed dose rates in air for the analyzed building materials. We note that the highest value is attributed to granite (91 nGy/h) while the lowest value is gypsum (9 nGy/h). These values of absorbed dose rates are below the permissible limit (55 nGy/h) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref5">5</xref>] with the exception of the granite sample.</p><p>To estimate the annual effective dose received by the population, we take into account the coefficient of conversion of dose rate absorbed in air in effective dose (0.7 Sv/Gy) and external occupancy factor (0.2) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref5">5</xref>] . The annual effective doses are determined as follows [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref5">5</xref>] :</p><p>Ė e x ( mSv / y ) = D ˙ ( nGy / h ) &#215; 8760 ( h ) &#215; 0.2 &#215; 0.7 ( Sv / Gy ) 10 − 6 (5)</p><p>Ė i n ( mSv / y ) = D ˙ ( nGy / h ) &#215; 8760 ( h ) &#215; 0.8 &#215; 0.7 ( Sv / Gy ) 10 − 6 (6)</p><p>The results of the annual external (Ė<sub>ex</sub>), internal (Ė<sub>in</sub>) and total (Ė<sub>tot</sub>) effective doses for the samples of building materials studied are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. It is found that the total value for each sample is less than the annual effective dose limit set at 1 mSv/y [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref5">5</xref>] . Therefore, we consider that these building materials do not present a radiological risk to the population and can be used in the construction of buildings.</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk</title><p>The Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk (ELCR) treats the probability of developing cancer during the life of a human being at a certain level of exposure. The ELCR is calculated using the following equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref29">29</xref>] :</p><p>ELCR = E ˙ t o t &#215; DL &#215; RF (7)</p><p>Or:</p><p>Ė<sub>tot</sub> is the total annual effective dose (μSv/year);</p><p>DL (Duration of Life) is the average life span of a human being (70 years);</p><p>RF is the Risk Factor fatal by cancer (Sv<sup>−1</sup>). For stochastic effects, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) estimates the value of this factor to be 0.05 for the public [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref30">30</xref>] .</p><p>In <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>, ELCR values range from 0.19 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup> to 1.96 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup> where the lowest value is found in the gypsum, while the highest is in the granite. The ELCR value at the granite sample far exceeds the permissible limit of 0.29 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref29">29</xref>] . As a result, the risk of cancer increases with increasing exposure to these materials.</p></sec><sec id="s3_6"><title>3.6. Volume Activities and Radon Exhalation Rates</title><p>After calculating the density of traces per unit area and per unit time in the LR115, the volume activities of the radon A V R n are calculated using the detection efficiency equal to 0.0258 (traces∙cm<sup>−2</sup>∙j<sup>−1</sup>)/(Bq∙m<sup>−3</sup>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref31">31</xref>] . The exhalation rate in terms of area (E<sub>S</sub> in Bq∙m<sup>−2</sup>∙h<sup>−1</sup>) and mass (E<sub>M</sub> in Bq∙kg<sup>−1</sup>∙h<sup>−1</sup>) of <sup>222</sup>Rn are determined by the following equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref32">32</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref33">33</xref>] :</p><p>E S = A V R n V λ R n S e [ t + ( 1 λ R n ) ( e − λ R n t − 1 ) ] (8)</p><p>E M = A V R n V λ R n M [ t + ( 1 λ R n ) ( e − λ R n t − 1 ) ] (9)</p><p>With A V R n is the volume activity of radon (Bq∙m<sup>−3</sup>∙h); V is the volume of the enclosure (m<sup>3</sup>); λ R n is the <sup>222</sup>Rn decay constant (h<sup>−1</sup>); S<sub>e</sub> is the area of the sample (m<sup>2</sup>); M is the mass of the sample in kg and t is the exposure time (h).</p><p>We present in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> the average values of the volumetric activity and exhalation rate in terms of area and mass of radon measured in the samples of the building materials analyzed. These values vary respectively from (72 to 350 Bq/m<sup>3</sup>), (56 to 273 mBq∙m<sup>−2</sup>∙h<sup>−1</sup>) and (3 to 15 mBq∙kg<sup>−1</sup>∙h<sup>−1</sup>) where the lowest values are identified in the gypsum, while the highest values are in the granite. All volumic activity values for radon are in the range of 100 to 300 Bq/m<sup>3</sup> recommended by ICRP [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref34">34</xref>] with the exception of some samples of gray cement (191 to 366 Bq/m<sup>3</sup>), ceramic (159 to 322 Bq/m<sup>3</sup>) and granite (132 to 610 Bq/m<sup>3</sup>).</p><p>In <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>, for comparison with our results, the volumetric activities and exhalation rates in terms of area and mass of radon in building materials samples in Morocco and some other countries. Overall, the obtained results in this study are comparable to those found in other countries, with the exception of a few values that are remarkably higher than ours.</p><p>A positive correlation is found between the specific activities of <sup>226</sup>Ra on the one hand, it is determined by high resolution gamma spectrometry and the exhalation rates of <sup>222</sup>Rn calculated with the alpha dosimetry based on the use of LR115 on the other hand. This correlation is illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> with a correlation coefficient in the order of 0.96.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Volume activity and exhalation rate of radon in different samples of Moroccan building materials</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Samples</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >A V R n (Bq/m<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >E<sub>S</sub> (mBq∙m<sup>−2</sup>∙h<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >E<sub>M</sub> (mBq∙kg<sup>−1</sup>∙h<sup>−1</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Type</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nr.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Range</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Range</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Range</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gray cement</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >191 - 366</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >248 &#177; 26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >149 - 286</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >194 &#177; 21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 - 15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 &#177; 2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gypsum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54 - 92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72 &#177; 7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42 - 72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56 &#177; 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 - 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 &#177; 1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >White cement</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >184 - 198</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >191 &#177; 19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >144 - 155</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >149 &#177; 15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 - 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 &#177; 1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Red brick</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130 - 192</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >159 &#177; 16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101 - 150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >124 &#177; 13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 - 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 &#177; 1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Block</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >140 - 211</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >176 &#177; 19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >109 - 165</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >137 &#177; 19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 - 9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 &#177; 1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ceramic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >159 - 322</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >226 &#177; 22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >124 - 251</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >176 &#177; 18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 - 13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 &#177; 2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Marble</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69 - 220</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >151 &#177; 16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54 - 172</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >118 &#177; 12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 - 9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 &#177; 1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Granite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >132 - 610</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >350 &#177; 34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103 - 476</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >273 &#177; 26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 - 25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 &#177; 3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sand</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >140 - 275</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >190 &#177; 20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >109 - 215</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >148 &#177; 16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 - 11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 &#177; 1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison between the Radon volume activities and the exhalation rates of radon in building materials in a few countries</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Samples</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Country</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >A V R n (Bq/m<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >E<sub>S </sub> (mBq∙m<sup>−2</sup>∙h<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >E<sub>M </sub> (mBq∙Kg<sup>−1</sup>∙h<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >References</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Gray cement</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >India</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >307</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >244</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref35">35</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jordan</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >177</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref36">36</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Morocco</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >248</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >194</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Present Work</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Cement White</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Palestine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref37">37</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >India</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >365</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >288</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref35">35</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Morocco</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >191</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >149</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Present Work</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Gypsum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Saudi Arabia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >157.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >145.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref38">38</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Algeria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref39">39</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Morocco</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Present Work</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Brick red</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Algeria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >166</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref39">39</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Morocco</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >159</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >124</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Present Work</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Block</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >India</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >235</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >241</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref40">40</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jordan</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref36">36</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Morocco</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >176</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >137</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Present Work</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Ceramic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Algeria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref39">39</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Palestine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >132</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref37">37</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Morocco</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >226</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >176</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Present Work</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Marble</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Algeria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref39">39</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Libya</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >264.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >212.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref41">41</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Saudi Arabia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref38">38</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Morocco</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >151</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >118</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Present Work</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Granite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Palestine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >246</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >146</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref37">37</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Morocco</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >273</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Present Work</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Sand</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Palestine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref37">37</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jordan</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >267</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >149</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87902-ref36">36</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Morocco</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >190</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >148</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Present Work</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>In this present work, we used gamma spectrometry to determine natural radioactivity in 50 samples of building materials commonly used in Morocco. The specific activities of the <sup>226</sup>Ra, <sup>232</sup>Th and <sup>40</sup>K radionuclides measured in these samples vary from 9 to 52 Bq/kg, from 3 to 63 Bq/kg and from 68 to 705 Bq/kg respectively. These activities of the studied samples are within the permissible limits with the exception of a few samples of red brick, gray cement, ceramic and granite. To evaluate the radiological impact of these building materials on the population, the environment and through these specific activities, we calculated several radiological risk indices, namely radium equivalent (Ra<sub>eq</sub>), internal (H<sub>in</sub>) and external (H<sub>ex</sub>) hazard indices, the absorbed dose rate (Ḋ), the total annual effective dose (Ė<sub>tot</sub>), the excess lifetime cancer risk (ELCR), the volume activities ( A V R n ) and the exhalation rate in terms of area (E<sub>S</sub>) and mass (E<sub>M</sub>). It follows that the values of these indices vary from 19 to 196 Bq/kg, 0.07 to 0.67, 0.05 to 0.53, 9 to 91 nGy/h, 0.05 to 0.56 mSv/y, 0.19 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup> to 1.96 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup>, 72 to 305 Bq/m<sup>3</sup>, 56 to 273 mBq∙m<sup>−2</sup>∙h<sup>−1</sup> and 3 to 15 mBq∙kg<sup>−1</sup>∙h<sup>−1</sup> respectively. The lowest values are identified for gypsum, while the highest are attributed to granite. All of the obtained results of these indices respect the permissible limits except for the Ra<sub>eq</sub> in some granite samples, the ELCR index in all samples except gypsum and the radon volumic activity in some gray cement samples, ceramic and granite. Consequently, the different types of building materials analyzed in this work do not present any significant health risks to the public and can be used in various construction activities with the exception of a few samples of red brick, gray cement, ceramic and granite. The choice of the use of red brick, gray cement and ceramic should be monitored and adapted according to the criteria of the limitation of the doses whereas the use of the granite must be moderate in order to limit over time the health risk which increases with the duration of exposure of humans to these building materials.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Kassi, B., Boukhair, A., Azkour, K., Fahad, M., Benjelloun, M. and Nourreddine, A.-M. (2018) Assessment of Exposure Due to Technologically Enhanced Natural Radioactivity in Various Samples of Moroccan Building Materials. World Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 8, 176-189. https://doi.org/10.4236/wjnst.2018.84015</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.87902-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Klepeis, N.E., Nelson, W.C., Ott, W.R., Robinson, J.P., Tsang, A.M., Switzer, P., Behar, J.V., Hern, S.C. and Engelmann, W.H. (2001) The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): A Resource for Assessing Exposure to Environmental Pollutants. Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, 11, 231-252. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500165</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Salthammer, T. and Bahadir, M. (2009) Occurrence, Dynamics and Reactions of Organic Pollutants in the Indoor Environment. CLEAN—Soil Air Water, 37, 417-435. https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.200900015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alance, M., Gaidolfi, L., Pessina, V. and Dallara, G. (1996) Distribution of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in Soils of Rio Grande do Norte (Brazil). Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 30, 55-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/0265-931X(95)00035-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) (2000) Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. United Nations, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) (2006) Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. United Nations, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Iyer, R.S. and Scott, J.A. (2001) Power Station Fly Ash—A Review of Value-Added Utilization outside of the Construction Industry. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 31, 217-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(00)00084-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pantazopoulou, E., Zebiliadou, O., Bartzas, G., Xenidis, A., Zouboulis, A. and Komnitsas, K. (2015) Industrial Solid Waste Management in Greece: The Current Situation and Prospects for Valorization. Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management, 41, 383-394.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Radiological Protection Principles Concerning the Natural Radioactivity of Building Materials. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/112.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saravanan, S., Jodha, A.S., Gopalani, D., Bhati, S.S. and Kumar, S. (2003) Preliminary Measurements of Natural Radioactivity at Madurai District of Tamilnadu, India. Radiation Measurements, 36, 397-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4487(03)00159-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Medhat, M.E. and Fayez-Hasssan, M. (2010) Natural Radioactivity of Egyptian Building Materials. Arab Journal of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, 43, 151-160.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Szabó, Z., V&amp;ouml;lgyesi, P., Nagy, H.é., Szabó, C., Kis, Z. and Csorba, O. (2013) Radioactivity of Natural and Artificial Building Materials—A Comparative Study. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 118, 64-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2012.11.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">(2005) Genie 2000, Version 3.2. Canberra Industries, Inc., Canberra France HQ &amp; Europe Coordination Bois Mouton, Canberra.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boukhair, A., Belahbib, L., Azkour, K., Nebdi, H., Benjelloun, M. and Nourreddine, A. (2016) Measurement of Natural Radioactivity and Radon Exhalation Rate in Coal Ash Samples from a Thermal Power Plant. World Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 6, 153-160. https://doi.org/10.4236/wjnst.2016.63017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Trevisi, R., Risica, S., D’Alessandro, M., Paradiso, D. and Nuccetelli, C. (2012) Natural Radioactivity in Building Materials in the European Union: A Database and an Estimate of Radiological Significance. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 105, 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2011.10.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yu, K.N., Guan, Z.J., Stokes, M.J. and Young, E.C.M. (1992) The Assessment of the Natural Radiation Dose Committed to the Hong Kong People. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 17, 31-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0265-931X(92)90033-P</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Turhan, &amp;Scedil;., Baykan, U.N. and &amp;scedil;en, K. (2008) Measurement of the Natural Radioactivity in Building Materials Used in Ankara and Assessment of External Doses. Journal of Radiological Protection, 28, 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1088/0952-4746/28/1/005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lee, S.C., Kim, C.K., Lee, D.M. and Kang, H.D. (2001) Natural Radionuclides Contents and Radon Exhalation Rates in Building Materials Used in South Korea. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 94, 269-274. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006499</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shoeib, M.Y. and Thabayneh, K.M. (2014) Assessment of Natural Radiation Exposure and Radon Exhalation Rate in Various Samples of Egyptian Building Materials. Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences, 7, 174-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2014.01.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Al-Sulaiti, H., Alkhomashi, N., Al-Dahan, N., Al-Dosari, M., Bradley, D.A., Bukhari, S., Matthews, M., Regan, P.H. and Santawamaitre, T. (2001) Determination of the Natural Radioactivity in Qatarian Building Materials Using High-Resolution Gamma-Ray Spectrometry. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, 652, 915-919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2011.01.020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Manic, G., Manic, V., Nikezic, D. and Krstic, D. (2015) The Dose of Gamma Radiation from Building Materials and Soil. NUKLEONIKA, 60, 951-958. https://doi.org/10.1515/nuka-2015-0148</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Najam, L.A., Tawfiq, N.F. and Kitah, F.H. (2013) Measurement of Natural Radioactivity in Building Materials Used in IRAQ. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 7, 56-66.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>El-Taher</surname><given-names> A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2012</year>)<article-title>Assessment of Natural Radioactivity Levels and Radiation Hazards for Building Materials Used in Qassim Area, Saudi Arabia</article-title><source> Romanian Journal of Physics</source><volume> 57</volume>,<fpage> 726</fpage>-<lpage>735</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rizzo, S., Brai, M., Basile, S., Bellia, S. and Hauser, S. (2001) Gamma Activity and Geochemical Features of Building Materials: Estimation of Gamma Dose Rate and Indoor Radon Levels in Sicily. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 55, 259-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-8043(00)00384-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mehdizadeh, S., Faghihi, R. and Sina, S. (2011) Natural Radioactivity in Building Materials in Iran. NUKLEONIKA, 56, 363-368.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xhixha, G., Ahmeti, A., Bezzon, G.P., Bitri, M., Broggini, C., Buso, G.P., Caciolli, A., Callegari, I., Cfarku, F., Colonna, T., Fiorentini, G., Guastaldi, E., Mantovani, F., Massa, G., Menegazzo, R., Mou, L., Prifti, D., Rossi Alvarez, C., Sadiraj Kuqi, Dh., Shyti, M., Tushe, L., Xhixha Kaeli, M. and Zyfi, A. (2013) First Characterization of Natural Radioactivity in Building Materials Manufactured in Albania. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 155, 217-223. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncs334</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Solak, S., Turhan, S., Ugur, F.A., Goren, E., Gezer, F., Yegingil, Z. and Yegingil, I. (2012) Evaluation of Potential Exposure Risks of Natural Radioactivity Levels Emitted from Building Materials Used in Adana, Turkey. Indoor and Built Environment, 23, 594-602. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X12448075</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Amrani, D. and Tahtat, M. (2001) Natural Radioactivity in Algerian Building Materials. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 54, 687-689. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-8043(00)00304-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tufail, M., Ahmad, N., Mirza, S.M., Mirza, N.M. and Khan, H.A. (1992) Natural Radioactivity from the Building Materials Used in Islamabad and Rawalpindi, Pakistan. The Science of the Total Environment, 121, 283-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(92)90321-I</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hayambu, P., Zaman, M.B., Lubaba, N.C.H., Munsanje, S.S. and Muleya, D. (1995) Natural Radioactivity in Zambian Building Materials Collected from Lusaka. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 199, 229-238. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02162371</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">International Commission on Radiological Protection (1990) Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Annals of the ICRP, 21, 1-3.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pape, A., Adloff, J.C., Barillon, R., Haessler, A., Hoernel, A., Nourreddine, A., Oster, D. and Weidmann, D. (1998) Quantitative Alpha-Particle Detection in a Homogeneous Medium with LR115. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 143, 557-560. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-583X(98)00398-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abu-Jarad, F., Fremlin, J.H. and Bull, R. (1980) A Study of Radon Emitted from Building Materials Using Plastic α-Track Detectors. Physics Medicine and Biology, 25, 683-694. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/25/4/007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khan, A.J., Prasad, R. and Tyagi, R.K. (1992) Measurement of Radon Exhalation Rate from Some Buildings Materials. International Journal of Radiation Applications and Instrumentation. Part D. Nuclear Tracks and Radiation Measurements, 20, 609-610. https://doi.org/10.1016/1359-0189(92)90013-L</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) (2014) Radiological Protection against Radon Exposure. Annals of the ICRP, 43, 3.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nain, M., Chauhan, R.P. and Chakarvarti, S.K. (2006) Alpha Radioactivity in Indian Cement Samples. Iranian Journal of Radiation Research, 3, 171-176.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ismail, A.M., Abumurad, K.M., Kullab, M.K. and Al-Bataina, B.A. (1994) Measurement of Rn-222 Concentrations in Building Materials Used in Jordan. Mutah Journal for Research and Studies, 28, 1119-1127.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dabayneh</surname><given-names> K.M. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2008</year>)<article-title>222Rn Concentration Level Measurements and Exhalation Rates in Different Types of Building Materials Used in Palestinian Buildings</article-title><source> Isotope and Radiation Research</source><volume> 40</volume>,<fpage> 278</fpage>-<lpage>289</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Amin, R.M. (2015) A Study of Radon Emitted from Building Materials Using Solid State Nuclear Track Detectors. Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences, 8, 516-522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2015.06.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Amrani, D. and Cherouati, D.E. (1999) Radon Exhalation Rate in Building Materials Using Plastic Track Detectors. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 242, 269-271. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02345552</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pereiraa, C.E., Vaidyana, V.K., Jojoa, P.J. and Ramachandran, T.V. (2008) Measurement of Radon Exhalation Rate from Building Materials Used in the Southwest Coastal Region of India. Indoor and Built Environment, 17, 472-475. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X08095830</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87902-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saad, A.F., Hend, H., Al-Awami and Hussein, N.A. (2014) Radon Exhalation from Building Materials Used in Libya. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 101, 15-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2014.03.030</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>