<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMMCE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4077</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmmce.2018.65040</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMMCE-87643</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Engineering</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Jebel Kurun Phosphate Rock Characteristics and Technical Viability to Produce Phosphoric Acid
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mohamed</surname><given-names>E. Elmahdi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kamil</surname><given-names>M. Wagialla</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>University of Khartoum, Faculty of Engineering, Khartoum, Sudan</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>06</day><month>08</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>555</fpage><lpage>567</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>2,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2018</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>27,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2018</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>30,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2018</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The technical viability for utilizing Jebel Kurun phosphate reserve in Sudan for the production of a fertilizer grade phosphoric acid is assessed. Statistical analysis has been carried for 56 samples. Phosphate rock has been classified into three main types and then the number of samples representing each type has been identified. Average values for phosphorus pentoxide is 19% and for uranium is 81.47 ppm. The most abundant elements are silicon, aluminum, phosphorus, calcium and iron. Aluminophosphate ore (CaO% ≤ 12%, Al
  <sub>2</sub>O
  <sub>3</sub>% ≥ 20%, P
  <sub>2</sub>O
  <sub>5</sub>% ≥ 18%) is represented by 55.36% of sampled phosphate rock. This type can be used to produce phosphoric acid when P
  <sub>2</sub>O
  <sub>5</sub> &gt; 30%. Apatite rock including aluminophosphate CaO% ≥ 25%, Al
  <sub>2</sub>O
  <sub>3</sub>% ≤ 10%, P
  <sub>2</sub>O
  <sub>5</sub>% ≥ 20%, 12% ≤ SiO
  <sub>2</sub> ≤ 35% is represented by 1.79% of sampled phosphate rock, this type can be used to produce phosphoric acid when it can meet the requirements of (CaO% ≥ 30%, Al
  <sub>2</sub>O
  <sub>3</sub>% ≤ 7%, P
  <sub>2</sub>O
  <sub>5</sub>% ≥ 25%, SiO
  <sub>2</sub>% ≤ 30%). Silica ore including phosphorus (SiO
  <sub>2</sub>% ≥ 40%, P
  <sub>2</sub>O
  <sub>5</sub>% ≤ 10%) is represented by 16.07% of sampled phosphate rock and Iron ore including phosphorus (Fe
  <sub>2</sub>O
  <sub>3</sub>% ≥ 20%, P
  <sub>2</sub>O
  <sub>5</sub>% ≤ 10%) is represented by 5.36% of samples. Both types cannot be used to produce phosphoric acid. The statistical distribution of P
  <sub>2</sub>O
  <sub>5</sub> in the size fractions for a core drilled samples is required.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Phosphate Rock</kwd><kwd> Jebel Kurun</kwd><kwd> Phosphoric Acid Production</kwd><kwd> Technical Viability</kwd><kwd> Statistical Analysis</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><sec id="s1_1"><title>1.1. Phosphate Rock Availability in Sudan</title><p>The only major phosphate rock reserves found up to now in the Sudan are the deposits discovered in 1983 during exploration work by geologists of the German Geological Group in the neighborhood of Jebel Kurun (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) on the eastern border of the Nuba Mountains [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87643-ref1">1</xref>] , at a distance of 690 kilometer from Khartoum and 1510 kilometer from Port Sudan.</p><p>This phosphate occurrence with minor base metal and uranium content forms a low elongated hill rising to about 25 meters above the surrounding plain. The hill extends for about 500 meter in a WSW-ENE direction and its width increases from about 100 meters in the west to 200 meters in the east [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87643-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>A preliminary resource estimate at Kurun indicates 1.68 million tonnes of phosphate ore grading 20% P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>, which amounts to about 336,000 tonnes of P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>. The depth is calculated to the base of the hills (12 m in the west and 20 m in the east), but the true depth of the phosphate mineralization is not known [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87643-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>K. Brinkmann (1985) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87643-ref2">2</xref>] indicates that during weathering, sulphides were dissolved, sulphate was removed away, and zinc and copper were held by limonite. The apatite was dissolved and since Al<sup>−3</sup> ions were abundant, alumino-phosphates were formed. Woodhouseite was formed in the presence of sulphate released from the weathering of sulphide and in the absence of sulphate, crandallite was precipitated. Wavellite was formed by loss of calcium as an ultimate product and in the presence of copper turquoise was formed.</p></sec><sec id="s1_2"><title>1.2. Visible Phosphate Reserve in Jebel Kurun</title><p>The arithmetic average of the chemical analysis of the 52 samples gave 20.1% P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>, in tests with formic acids. Soluble phosphates were proved to be less than 20% of total phosphates, and the visible phosphate reserves of the sampled portion of Jebel Kurun down to the elevation of the plain were estimated at 336,000 ton of P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87643-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>The sampled area covered about 32,000 m<sup>2</sup> i.e. 200 &#215; 50 = 10,000 m<sup>2</sup> in the west plus 275 &#215; 80 = 22,000 m<sup>2</sup> in the east. The average elevation above the plain was taken at 12 meters in the west and 20 meters in the east. The average phosphate content is 20% P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> and the specific gravity = 3 ton/m<sup>3</sup>. The limits of the phosphate mineralization were not determined laterally and in depth and therefore an increase in the amount of the reserves is possible [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87643-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>Geological Research Authorities of the Sudan expect the continuation of phosphate towards the depth; therefore they expect a total reserve of phosphate may reach 81 million tons with average content of 20% P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87643-ref3">3</xref>] . This estimation cannot be reliable without detailed drilling exploration.</p><p>Brinkman in 1986 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87643-ref4">4</xref>] discovered two types of phosphate deposits in Kurun and Uro areas in the center of eastern Nuba Mountains. However, using of these phosphates as fertilizers, it is necessary to check them chemically, especially for radioactive uranium presence [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87643-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>Twelve selected samples from Jebel Kurun phosphate―bearing rocks were analyzed by X-ray diffraction method and were found to contains the following minerals (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87643-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>Giad industrial group (Sudan) reported the analysis results in 2017 for two samples (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) and (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>) for the characterization of Jebel Kurun phosphate rock (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>) for grain size distribution and (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) for chemical composition.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Phosphate minerals in Kurun-Uro rock phosphate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87643-ref1">1</xref>] </title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >No</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Name</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Formula</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Color</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crandallite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CaAl<sub>3</sub>H[(OH)<sub>6</sub>(PO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>]∙H<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yellow</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Woodhouseite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CaAl<sub>3</sub>[(OH)<sub>6</sub>(SO<sub>4</sub>)(PO<sub>4</sub>)]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yellow</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wavellite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Al<sub>3</sub>[(OH)<sub>3</sub>(PO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>]∙5H<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Green</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Turguoise</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CuAl<sub>6</sub>[(OH)<sub>6</sub>(PO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>4</sub>∙4H<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Blue</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Apatite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ca<sub>5</sub>[(F,Cl,OH) (PO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>3</sub>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Variscite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Al(PO<sub>4</sub>)∙2H<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Grey</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Grain size distribution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87643-ref6">6</xref>] </title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >No</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Grains distribution</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Unit</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >LOT KR-AP</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >LOT KR-Al</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >part &gt; 1 mm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >part [900 &#181;m - 1 mm]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >part [500 &#181;m - 900 &#181;m]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.54</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >part [400 &#181;m - 500 &#181;m]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >part [300 &#181;m - 400 &#181;m]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.26</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >part [200 &#181;m - 300 &#181;m]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >part [100 &#181;m - 200 &#181;m]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >part [20 &#181;m - 100 &#181;m]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >part &lt; 20 &#181;m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The analytical results indicate the following observations:</p><p>• A very high content of alumina in the rock.</p><p>• Most of the phosphate present as fluorapatite, that has an excellent digestibility in hydrochloric acid.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Chemical analyses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87643-ref6">6</xref>] </title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >LOT KR-AP</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >LOT KR-Al</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Analysis</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Units</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Values</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >30.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >22.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CaO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >26.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >7.76</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SiO2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >7.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >8.66</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >18.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >31.18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.96</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MgO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fluor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.91</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ag</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >&lt;5</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >&lt;5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >As</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >&lt;25</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >&lt;25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ba</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >518</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1413</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >&lt;10</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >&lt;10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >21.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >4.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Co</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >12.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >241</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2339</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >&lt;10</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >&lt;10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Li</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.74</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >501</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >140</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >10.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >10.29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >22.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >45.55</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >&lt;10</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >&lt;10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Se</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >&lt;10</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >&lt;10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >5003</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >13,772</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >V</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2382</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >5113</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1827</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >3508</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>• Sand is present as quartz.</p><p>• Alumina and phosphate are present as Crandallite: CaAl<sub>3</sub>(OH)<sub>6</sub>(PO<sub>3</sub>(O<sub>0.5</sub>(OH)<sub>0.5</sub>))<sub>2</sub>.</p></sec><sec id="s1_3"><title>1.3. The Objective of the Present Work Is to</title><p>• Assess the technical viability for the utilization of Jebel Kurun phosphate rock to produce phosphoric acid for fertilizer usage.</p><p>• Classification of J. Kurun phosphate rock and identification of types suitable for the production of phosphoric acid.</p><p>• Identification of the chemical characteristics and behavior of Jebel Kurun phosphate rock.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>Surface samples were collected (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>) and analyzed by the Geological Research Authorities of the Sudan (GRAS), from Kurun area. A total of eleven profiles were covered. The distance between each profile is forty meters, and the distance among points inside each profile is about ten meters. Fifty six samples were taken in 2011. Thirty nine elements and Loss on Ignition (LOI) at 1000˚C were tested and reported for Jebel Kurun phosphate rock samples.</p><p>Samples were analyzed by using X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) after grinding, homogenizing and pelletizing process. The concentration of the detected elements was calculated from the measured net intensity of the corresponding fluorescent X-rays combined with elemental sensitivity factor and the coefficient of absorption in the residual matrix of the specimen through iteration procedure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87643-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87643-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87643-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>Statistical analysis for the collected samples were carried on by using Microsoft Office Excel software program to calculate the average value, maximum value, minimum value, variance and correlation coefficient between tested elements and P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> concentration.</p><p>Correlation coefficient strength between each element and P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> concentration was divided into seven classes: No correlation, very weak, weak, moderate, strong, very strong and perfect correlation</p><p>Giad Industrial Group in Sudan, studied the analysis report with a conventional technology supplier and classified Kurun mining area phosphate rock into three main types (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref>) as follows:</p><p>1) The first type: Phosphate rock including Lucinite or aluminophosphate ore</p><p>• Main component content:</p><p>CaO% ≤ 12%, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>% ≥ 20%, P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>% ≥ 18%</p><p>2) The second type: Apatite rock including aluminophosphate</p><p>• Main component content:</p><p>CaO% ≥ 25%, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>% ≤ 10%, P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>% ≥ 20%, 12% ≤ SiO<sub>2</sub> ≤ 35%</p><p>3) The third type: Silica ore including phosphorus or iron ore including phosphorus</p><p>• Main component content:</p><p>SiO<sub>2</sub>% ≥ 40%, P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>% ≤ 10%</p><p>Or</p><p>Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>% ≥ 20%, P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>% ≤ 10%</p><p>The reserve portion that could be utilized to produce phosphoric acid by conventional processes has been estimated by identifying the number of samples representing type one and type two by using Microsoft Office Excel.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussions</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Jebel Kurun Phosphate Behavior</title><p>The statistical analysis results (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>) shows the estimated phosphorus pentoxide ratio P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>% in Jebel Kurun area has an average value of 19%, and ranges from 0.13% to 32.94% with a standard deviation of 9.05. There is strong negative correlation (Tables 4-8, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1) with value (−0.82) between phosphorus pentoxide and silicon dioxide, moderate positive correlation between phosphorus pentoxide and Aluminium oxide Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, Calcium oxide CaO, Loss on Ignition LOI at 1000˚C, Vanadium V with values 0.66, 0.54, 0.63 and 0.61 respectively.</p><p>It is important to remember that the correlation coefficient between two variables is a measure of their linear relationship and that a value of r = 0 implies a lack of linearity and not a lack of association. a value of r equal to +1 implies a perfect linear relationship with a positive slope, while a value of r equal to −1 results from a perfect linear relationship with a negative slope [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87643-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87643-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87643-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><p>Uranium in Jebel Kurun area has an average value of 81.47 ppm (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0) and ranges from 1.2 ppm to 208.3 ppm and a standard deviation of 53.89, a very weak positive correlation coefficient (0.16) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1) with phosphorus pentoxide. Phosphate samples with an average uranium content lower than 60 ppm showed a higher correlation of 0.35 between uranium and P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> and represent 41.07% of total samples, a very weak negative correlation (-0.05) when uranium content is higher than 60 ppm for 58.93% of samples.</p><p>A research published by the Journal of the Argentine Chemical Society [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87643-ref5">5</xref>] stated that a positive relation exists between uranium content and P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> percentage</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Statistical analysis for major elements</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Item</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >SiO<sub>2</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CaO</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cr<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >K<sub>2</sub>O</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >MgO</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >MnO</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sub>2</sub>O</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maximum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.94</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Minimum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Standard Deviation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Correlation Coefficient</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Statistical analysis for trace elements</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TiO<sub>2</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >LOI</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ba</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ce</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Dy</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Er</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Eu</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ga</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Gd</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Hf</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1000˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ppm</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1535.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.43</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maximum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11534.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >177.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Minimum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Standard Deviation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1917.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Correlation Coefficient</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Statistical analysis for trace elements</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >La</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Lu</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Nb</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Nd</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pr</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Rb</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sc</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sm</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sn</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sr</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ppm</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6069.55</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maximum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >115.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15605.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Minimum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Standard Deviation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4901.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Correlation Coefficient</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.44</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Statistical analysis for trace elements</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ta</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Tb</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Th</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Tm</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >U</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >V</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >W</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Y</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Yb</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Zr</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ppm</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3768.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.68</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maximum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >208.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13620</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >308.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >308</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Minimum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Standard Deviation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.214</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2703.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Correlation Coefficient</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-0.37</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref></label><caption><title> Scaling correlation factors for phosphate rock components</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Component</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Positive</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Strength</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Negative</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Component</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ba</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >r = 0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No correlation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >r = 0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-----------</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Er, Nb, Sc, U, Y</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 &lt; r &lt; 0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Very weak</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.25 &lt; r &lt; 0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cr<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, MgO, Na<sub>2</sub>O, TiO<sub>2</sub>, Dy, Eu, Gd, Ta, Tb</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ce, Ga, Lu, Sr, Tm, W, Yb, U &lt; 60 PPM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25 &lt; r &lt; 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Weak</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, K<sub>2</sub>O, MnO, La, Nd, Pr, Rb, Sm, Th, Zr</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, CaO, LOI 1000˚C, V</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 &lt; r &lt; 0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Moderate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.75 &lt; r &lt; −0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >------------</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >-----------</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75 &lt; r &lt; 0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Strong</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.9 &lt; r &lt; −0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SiO<sub>2</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >------------</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9 &lt; r &lt; 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Very Strong</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1 &lt; r &lt; −0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-----------</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Perfect Correlation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >---------</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>in phosphate ore samples from Kurun area (r = +0.58), which contain 56.63 mg/kg uranium in average. The chemical analysis of phosphate ore samples indicated that in the case of phosphate samples that contain low uranium concentration, there is a strong positive correlation between uranium content and P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>%, but if uranium concentration increases over 60 mg/kg, no correlation exits.</p><p>Samples with P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> content higher than 15% and an average uranium content 88.93 ppm, indicate a weak negative correlation (-0.37) between P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> and uranium, and represent 78.57% of phosphate samples. Accordingly uranium would not be expected to be of economic interest, considering that samples that have P2O5 content lower than 15% and average uranium content 54.13 ppm exhibited a moderate positive correlation 0.61 between uranium and P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> and represent 21.43% of total samples.</p><p>Statistical analysis for trace elements (Tables 5-7 &amp; Figures 8-11) indicates the mean values and correlation coefficient with phosphorous pentoxide.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Jebel Kurun Phosphate Classification</title><p>Giad Industrial Group in Sudan admitted that the effective reserves for the type 1 and type 2 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref>) of phosphate rock in Kurun mining area should be more than twenty million tons to achieve economic viability.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions and Recommendations</title><p>• Phosphorus pentoxide P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> has an average value of 19%; the most abundant major elements for the studied phosphate rock are silicon, aluminum, phosphorus, calcium and iron. Strong negative correlation (-0.82) is between phosphorus pentoxide and silicon dioxide.</p><p>• Samples with P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> content higher than 15% and average uranium content 88.93 ppm, indicate negative correlation (-0.37) between P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> and uranium; they represent 78.57% of phosphate samples, and accordingly uranium would not be expected to be of economic interest, considering that samples</p><table-wrap id="table9" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref></label><caption><title> Jebel Kurun phosphate classification</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >No</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphate ore Type</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of Samples</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Comments</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Type one</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphate rock including Lucinite or aluminophosphate ore CaO% ≤ 12%, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>% ≥ 20%, P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>% ≥ 18%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Should be beneficiated before producing phosphoric acid. Can be used to produce phosphoric acid by chemical method when the content of P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> is more than 30%. Two samples have a P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> content higher than 30% The technical processes are complicated and the costs of production are high.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Type two</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Apatite rock including aluminophosphate CaO% ≥ 25%, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>% ≤ 10%, P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>% ≥ 20%, 12% ≤ SiO<sub>2</sub> ≤ 35%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Can be used to produce qualified concentrated phosphate rock by floatation method when it can meet the requirement (CaO% ≥ 30%, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>% ≤ 7%, P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>% ≥ 25%, SiO<sub>2</sub>% ≤ 30%). The technical processes are simple and the costs of production are reasonable.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Type three</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Silica ore including phosphorus SiO<sub>2</sub>% ≥ 40%, P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>% ≤ 10%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cannot be used to produce phosphoric acid</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Iron ore including phosphorus Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>% ≥ 20%, P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>% ≤ 10%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cannot be used to produce phosphoric acid</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Other</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >--------------</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-------------------------------</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Total Number of Samples</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>that have P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> content lower than 15% and average uranium content 54.13 ppm expressed a positive correlation (0.61) between uranium and P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> and they represent 21.43% of total samples.</p><p>• Aluminophosphate ore (CaO% ≤ 12%, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>% ≥ 20%, P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>% ≥ 18%) is represented by 55.36% of sampled phosphate rock; this type can be used to produce phosphoric acid when P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> &gt; 30%.</p><p>• Apatite rock including aluminophosphate CaO% ≥ 25%, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>% ≤ 10%, P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>% ≥ 20%, 12% ≤ SiO<sub>2</sub> ≤ 35% is represented by 1.79% of sampled phosphate rock; this type can be used to produce phosphoric acid when it can meet the requirement (CaO% ≥ 30%, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>% ≤ 7%, P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>% ≥ 25%, SiO<sub>2</sub>% ≤ 30%).</p><p>• Silica ore including phosphorus (SiO<sub>2</sub>% ≥ 40%, P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>% ≤ 10%) is represented by 16.07% of sampled phosphate rock, Iron ore including phosphorus (Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>% ≥ 20%, P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>% ≤ 10%) is represented by 5.36% of samples phosphate rock, and both types cannot be used to produce phosphoric acid.</p><p>• Study the statistical distribution of P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> in the size fractions of the mined and crushed rock is recommended and using a diamond drill for sampling deposits in order to calculate the reserve by grade.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>I would first like to thank my thesis advisor Prof. Kamil M. Wagialla of the Chemical Engineering Department/Faculty of Engineering at University of Khartoum. I would also like to thank my colleagues in Giad Industrial Group (Sudan), Geological Research Authority―(Sudan), Arab Fertilizer Association (Egypt), Ecophos Technologies (Belgium) and Norinco Company (China) for their support and valuable inputs.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Elmahdi, M.E. and Wagialla, K.M. (2018) Jebel Kurun Phosphate Rock Characteristics and Technical Viability to Produce Phosphoric Acid. Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, 6, 555-567. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmmce.2018.65040</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.87643-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ahmed, A.A.M. (1998) Sudan Industrial Minerals and Rocks. Center for Strategic Studies, Khartoum.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87643-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brinkmann, K. and Zitzman, A. (1985) Geological, Geochemical and Geophysical Investigations in Gossans and Other Ironstones between Er Terter and Abu Gubeiha (BGR &amp; GMRD).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87643-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khalil, R. and Sulaiman, T. (2014) Agro-Minerals in Sudan. Geological Research Authorities of the Sudan, Khartoum, Sudan.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87643-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brinkmann, K. (1985) Minerals Prospecting in Northeast Nuba Mountains. Southern Kordofan Phase 1080/81, BGR, Hannover.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87643-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adam, A.A. and Eltayeb, M.A.H. (2010) Uranium Abundance in Some Sudanese Phosphate Ores. Journal of the Argentine Chemical Society, 97, 166-177.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87643-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Giad Industrial Group (2017) Research and Studies Department, Jebel Kurun Phosphate Rock Feasibility Tests, Khartoum.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87643-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jenkens, R., Gould, R.W. and Gedcke, D. (1981) Quantitative X-Ray Spectrometry. Marcel Decker Inc., New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87643-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hassan, A.R. (1989) Prospecting Methods for Uranium and Other Associated Mineralization in the Nuba Mountains, Sudan. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Khartoum, Sudan.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87643-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ogunleye, P.O., Mayaki, M.C. and Amapu, I.Y. (2002) Radioactivity and Heavy Metal Composition of Nigerian Phosphate Rocks: Possible Environmental Implications. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 62, 39-48.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0265-931X(01)00149-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87643-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Walpole, R.E., Myers, R.H., Myers, S.L. and Ye, K. (2011) Probability &amp; Statistics for Engineers &amp; Scientists. 9th Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87643-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Montgomery, D.C., Runger, G.C. and Hubele, N.F. (2010) Engineering Statistics. 4th Edition, Arisona State University, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87643-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Montgomery, D.C. and Runger, G.C. (2007) Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers. 4th Edition, Arizona State University, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., New York.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>