<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2018.910153</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-87605</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  The Potential Role of Cu&lt;sup&gt;2+&lt;/sup&gt; and Combined Action with IAA on Tolerance Strategy of Two Broad Bean Cultivars
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hamdia</surname><given-names>M. Abd El-Samad</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mohamed</surname><given-names>Abdo K. Shaddad</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kholoud</surname><given-names>N. Abd El-Hakeem</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Botany Department, Faulty of Science, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Botany Department and Microbiology, Faulty of Science, Minia University, El-Minia, Egypt</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>05</day><month>09</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>10</issue><fpage>2100</fpage><lpage>2119</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>11,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2018</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>26,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2018</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>29,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2018</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The present work was conducting to study the strategy response of two broad bean cultivars Assiut 84 and Assiut 125 to different Cu
  <sup>2+</sup>
   concentrations 100 ppm, 200 ppm, 300 ppm and 350 ppm in addition to control and interactions with IAA treatments. The dry matter exhibited the biphasic effect of Cu
  <sup>2+</sup>
   
  on the growth criteria of the two broad bean cultivars. While the lower and moderate doses of Cu<sup>2+</sup> (100 ppm and 200 ppm) stimulated the growth of the two cultivars, the higher dose
  s
   revealed the opposite event where the growth dropped in both cultivars. This effect was more pronounced in cv. Assiut 84 than in cv. Assiut 125 and also at the higher Cu<sup>2+</sup> concentration the growth dropped slightly in cv. Assiut 84 and highly significantly in cv. Assiut 125. The percent of increase
   
  in dry matter at 200 ppm 
  in
   stem and leaf of cv. Assiut 84 was 120.45% and 155.31%, otherwise this percent of increase in these organs of cv. Assiut 125 was 114.29% and 131.41%. However the percent of reduction at 350 ppm Cu
  <sup>2</sup>
  <sup>+</sup>
   in root and stem of cv. Assiut 84 was 74.13%, 79.23% and in root, stem and leaf of cv. Assiut 125 was 59.27%, 70.91%, 70.76% compared with control plants.
   
  Soluble carbohydrate in cv. Assiut 84 and cv. Assiut 125 was markedly increased while soluble protein was decreased in root, stem and in leaves at lower Cu
  <sup>2</sup>
  <sup>+</sup>
   concentration.
   
  Also while Cu<sup>2+</sup>-stressed cv. Assiut 84 maintained potassium and magnesium levels around the control values and some promotion occurred especially in roots and stems, these cations dropped markedly in cv. Assiut 125 as a result of Cu<sup>2+</sup> treatments. While Cu<sup>2+</sup> had a marked stimulatory effect in the absorption and accumulation of calcium in the different organs of cv. Assiut 84, it, on the other hand, significantly inhibited the accumulation of this cation in the different organs of cv. Assiut 125. Treatments broad bean cultivars with Cu<sup>2+</sup> plus IAA induced an increase in growth parameters, soluble suga, soluble protein, K<sup>+</sup>, Ca<sup>++</sup> and Mg<sup>++</sup> in different parts of two tested cultivars. The uptake, translocation and distribution of mineral ions are affected by various growth regulators among others by IAA. This strategy might be important in heavy metals tolerance mechanisms of crop plants.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Broad Bean Cultivars</kwd><kwd> Sensitive</kwd><kwd> Tolerant</kwd><kwd> Copper</kwd><kwd> IAA</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Heavy metals as Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, Ni and AS include elements with densities above 5 g∙cm<sup>−3</sup>, but the term was extended to a vast range of metals and metalloids [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref3">3</xref>] . High contents of trace elements have been found in numerous soils, which may become toxic for plants and other components of terrestrial biota [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref6">6</xref>] . Essential micronutrients are required in low contents to develop plant normally, but are toxic in high contents [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref8">8</xref>] . These can lead to physiological alterations, which are widely documented [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref10">10</xref>] . Cu<sup>++</sup> plays an essential role in cell wall metabolism, signaling to the transcription and protein trafficking machinery, oxidative phosphorylation, iron mobilization and the biogenesis of molybdenum cofactor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref13">13</xref>] . On the other side, Cu interferes in several physiological processes and therefore, potentially inhibits plant growth, resulting in a decrease in performance, delays in leaf and root growth, as well as anatomical and ultra structural alterations that often lead to the formation and accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref15">15</xref>] . Neto et al. (2017) discuss the role of plant growth hormones abscisic acid, auxin, brassinosteroid and eythylene in signaling pathways, defense mechanisms and alleviation of heavy metal toxicity. Ochao et al. (2018) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref16">16</xref>] try to evaluate the nutritional components in seeds of green pea 9 Pisum sativum cultivated in soil amended with nCuO at 50 or 100 mg/kg with 100 μM IAA. Thus, the present work was conducted to compare the Cu<sup>2+</sup> tolerance of the two selected broad bean cultivars Assiut 84 and Assiut 125 and ameliorating effect of IAA during vegetative growth of two broad bean cultivars.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Experimental Sites and Cu<sup>2+</sup> Treatments</title><p>Broad bean seeds cv. Assiut 84 and Assiut 125 were obtained from one of the active breading programs directed by Prof. Dr. Esmat Waly and Prof. Dr. Saeyd Abdellah, Faculty of Agriculture, Assiut University, Egypt. Broad bean plant is important economic crop plants and consider the first plant food for Egyptian people because it contains highly benefit protein and other essential elements for man healthy, which has several common names (broad bean, fava bean, faba bean, horse bean, field bean, tic bean), is a species of bean (Fabaceae) native to North Africa and southwest Asia and is extensively cultivated elsewhere. In much of the world, the name broad bean is used for the large-seeded cultivars grown for human food. In Egypt, faba beans are the most common fast food item in the Egyptian diet, eaten by rich and poor alike. Egyptians eat faba beans in various ways; the most popular way of preparing faba beans is taking cooked beans, mashing them and adding oil, lemon, salt and cumin. The prepared beans, called fulmedames, are then eaten with bread. Faba bean is an excellent source of protein (20% - 25%), calcium (0.15%), phosphorus (0.50%), lysine (1.5%) and methionine-cystine (0.5%) in dry weight. It is also an excellent source of complex carbohydrates, dietary fiber, choline, lecithin, minerals and secondary metabolites (phenolics and levo-dihydroxy-phenylalanine (L-DOPA), which is the precursor of the neurotransmitter dopamine and naturally found in seedlings, green pods and beans) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref18">18</xref>] . Broad bean seeds were surface sterilized by immersion in a mixture of ethanol 96% and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (1:1) for 3 minutes, followed by several washings with sterile distilled water. The concentrations of Cu<sup>2+</sup> were chosen after preliminary experiments in which the seeds were subjected to different concentrations of Cu<sup>2+</sup>. The chosen concentrations caused slight stimulation and moderate inhibition of germination. Cu<sup>2+</sup> was added as Cu<sup>2+</sup> sulphate (CuSO<sub>4</sub>). Ten seeds were sown per pot. Each pot contained 3.6 kg of garden clay soil. The clay soil comprise four components minerals and soil organic matter make up the solid fraction, whereas air and water comprise the pore space fraction. A typical agricultural soil is usually around 50% solid particles and 50% pores (Adapted from Brady and Weil, 2002 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref19">19</xref>] ). Soil particle of clay is &lt;0.002 invisible to naked eye. Considerations of working in controlled environments were followed by Tibbitts &amp; Langhans (1993) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref20">20</xref>] . All pots were irrigated with tap water for four weeks until full germination. In preliminary experiments explained that low concentration is 100 ppm CuSo<sub>4</sub> and the high concentration is 350 ppm. The seedlings were then irrigated by different concentrations of CuSO<sub>4</sub> solutions (0, 100 ppm, 200 ppm, 350 ppm) and were classified into two groups.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Cu<sup>2+</sup> Treatment and Combined with IAA</title><p>From two of previous groups one was sprayed by 200 ppm IAA. In order to maintain the osmotic potential, the soil moisture content was kept near the field capacity using tap water. The seedlings were left to grow in natural conditions under these conditions for 150 days. At the end of the experimental period (5 months) yields of the different organs (roots, stems and leaves) were determined.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Laboratory Analysis for Metabolities</title><p>To determine the dry matter yields of roots, stems and leaves they were dried in an oven at 80˚C. Successive weighting was carried out until the constant dry weight of each sample was reached. The leaf area was measured using the disk method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref21">21</xref>] and was expressed as cm<sup>2</sup>/plant. The photosynthetic pigments, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotenoids, were determined using the spectrophotometric method recommended by Metzner et al. (1965) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref22">22</xref>] . The soluble carbohydrates were determined by the method of anthronesulphoric acid which was stated by Fales (1951) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref23">23</xref>] . The soluble proteins were determined according to the method adopted by Lowery et al. (1951) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref24">24</xref>] . Calcium and magnesium determination by Schwarzenbach and Biedermann, 1948 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref25">25</xref>] was employed. Potassium, Flamephotometer method using Carl Zeiss Flamephotometer was used by Williams and Twine, (1960) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref26">26</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Statistical Analysis</title><p>The triplicate sets of the experimental data for the different tested parameters were subjected to the one way analysis of variances (ANOVA) test in accordance with the experimental design using the SPSS program, version 13.0 and the means were compared using the least significant differences, L.S.D. at P levels of 0.05 and 0.01 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref27">27</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results</title><p>In cv. Assiut 84 the dry matter of stems and leaves increased as Cu<sup>2+</sup> increased in the soil up to 200 ppm, then while a slight stimulation was obtained in leaves (about 4%), a slight reduction was recorded in stems (20%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). The dry matter of roots remained more or less unchanged up to 200 ppm Cu, then about 24% reduction was recorded, which means that the three plant organs responded differently to Cu<sup>2+</sup> treatments. In cv. Assiut 125 the dry matter of stems and leaves increased by Cu<sup>2+</sup> treatment up to 200 ppm, which was more pronounced in leaves, then a marked reduction was recorded (about 30% in both). In roots, a gradual reduction was exhibited by increasing the Cu<sup>2+</sup> concentration in the soil (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). This inhibitory effect was more obvious at the level of 350 ppm Cu<sup>++</sup> (about 40% reduction). In cv. Assiut 125, an increase in leaf area was obtained up to the level of 100 ppm Cu<sup>++</sup>, and then a highly significant reduction was obtained which was much more pronounced at the level of 350 ppm Cu<sup>++</sup>. At this level, the percentage of reduction was about 30%, as compared with that of control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Leaf area in Assiut 84 was increased up to 200 ppm Cu<sup>++</sup> treatment, then a reducion was recorded compared with uncupper application (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Of special interest in this work is that the concentration of the photosynthetically active pigments in cv. Assiut 84 seemed to be increasing by the increasing concentration of Cu<sup>++</sup> in the soil (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(a)). Consequently, the highest concentration of the different fractions of the photosynthetic pigments was registered at the highest dose of Cu<sup>++</sup>. At this level, the percent of increase in chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotenoids was 29.7%, 32.014% and 54.35% respectively when compared with the control values. It is also noticeable that the highest increase was obtained in the values of carotenoids when compared with</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of CuSO<sub>4</sub> and CuSO<sub>4</sub> plus IAA on the dry matter yield (g. plant<sup>-1</sup>) of the different organs of the broad bean cultivars Assiut 84 and Assiut 125</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Teatment</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CuSO<sub>4 </sub>(ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Root</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Stem</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Leaves</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cv. Assiut 84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >CuSO<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78 *</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >125.305</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.97**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >155.305</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >104.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >CuSO<sub>4</sub> + IAA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >112.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >129.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.10**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >177.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >126.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.44**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >155.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.55**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >249.36</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.69**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >158.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.49**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >158.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.52**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >244.70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >123.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.29**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >208.36</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >L.S.D. 0.05%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cv. Assiut 125</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CuSO<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.49**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120.34</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.41**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >114.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >131.41</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.37**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.76</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CuSO<sub>4</sub> + IAA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.89**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >134.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.27**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >229.78</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.02**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >143.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.32**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >238.45</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.53*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.09**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >148.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.22**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >220.76</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.51*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.92**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >136.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >129.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >L. S. D. 0.05%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>**Highly significance compared with control plants.</p><p>chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b whatever the concentration of Cu<sup>++</sup> used. The data of cv. Assiut 125 exhibited that an increase in chlorophyll a was reported as a result of Cu<sup>2+</sup> treatment. There is a gradual dropping off in chlorophyll b</p><p>content by increasing the dose of Cu<sup>++</sup> in the soil (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(b)). At the level of 350 ppm Cu<sup>++</sup> the chlorophyll b content decreased to about 70%. On the other hand, there is an unexpected increase in carotenoids at all the levels of Cu<sup>++</sup>. The percent of increase in carotenoids fluctuated from 36% to 73% over those of control values. In roots, stems and leaves of cv. Assiut 84 the production of the soluble carbohydrates was stimulated by the various levels of Cu<sup>2+</sup> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Soluble carbohydrate in cv. Assiut 84 was markedlys increased in root, stem and in leaves at lower Cu<sup>++</sup> concentration (100 ppm Cu<sup>++</sup>, the percent of increase was 142.09% compared with untreated plant). It is worthy to note that the high value was recorded at 200 ppm in root and stem, the percent of accumulation in soluble carbohydrate was 133.33% and 143.35% in root and stem (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Soluble carbohydrate was accumulated with elevating Cu<sup>++</sup> level in cv. Assiut 125, the high value was recorded at 200 ppm Cu<sup>++</sup> level in root and stem, the percent of increase was 210.68% and 130.14% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). While a reduction was exhibited in leaf organ, the percent of reduction at 350 ppm Cu<sup>++</sup> level was 65.75% compared</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> The effect of CuSO<sub>4</sub> and CuSO<sub>4</sub> plus IAA treatments on soluble sugar contents (mg. g.<sup>-1</sup> d. m.) in the roots, stem and leaves of the broad bean cultivars Assiut 84 and Assiut 125</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Treatment</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CuSO<sub>4</sub> (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Soluble sugar</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cv. Assiut 84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Root</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stem</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaves</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >CuSO<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.35**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >122.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.23*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >109.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.05**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >142.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.45**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >133.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.04**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >143.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102.85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.13**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.13**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >117.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.788*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >CuSO<sub>4</sub> + IAA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.54**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.86**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.74**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.53</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.60**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.77**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.07**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.92</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.97**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >118.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.83*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.01**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.42</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.26**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >111.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.97**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >124.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.95**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.91</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >L. S. D. 0.05%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cv. Assiut 125</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >CuSO<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.86*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >141.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.79*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >126.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.22**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >210.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.99*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.99**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >124.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.74**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >CuSO<sub>4</sub> + IAA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.67**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >220.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.64**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >216.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.04**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160.74</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.16**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >250.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.26**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >209.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.30**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >186.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.03**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >248.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.35**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >230.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.36**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >164.45</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.44*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >153.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.19**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >171.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105.93</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >L. S. D. 0.05%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>**Highly significance compared with control plants.</p><p>with uncoper treatments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Soluble protein in cv. Assiut 84 and cv. Assiut 125 was significantly decreased as increasing Cu<sup>++</sup> concentration in three different organs, this effect was pronounced in root organs than stem and leaf (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). The percent of reduction at 350 ppm Cu<sup>++</sup> level was 46.63%, 78.2%, and 58.11% in root, stem and leaf whereas in cv. Assiut 125 this percent was 66.28%, 85.53% in root and stem. Except of this trend soluble protein in leaf of cv. Assiut 125 was markedly accumulated, the percent of increase at 350 ppm Cu<sup>2+</sup> level was 180% compared with uncopper treatment (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). In cv. Assiut 84 a slight increase in potassium content in roots and stems was exhibited by Cu<sup>2+</sup> treatment, while in leaves a slight reduction was recorded (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). This reduction did not exceed 18% at the level of 350 ppm. In cv. Asiut 125 potassium in roots, stems and leaves decreased gradually by increasing the Cu<sup>2+</sup> concentration in the soil (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). This inhibitory effect was more pronounced at the highest dose of Cu<sup>2+</sup> and in stems than in roots or leaves. Potassium content in leaves seemed to be less affected by copper treatments. At the level of 350 ppm</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> The effect of CuSO<sub>4</sub> and CuSO<sub>4</sub> plus IAA treatments on soluble proteins contents (mg. g.<sup>-1</sup> d. m.) in the roots, stem and leaves of the broad bean cultivars Assiut 84 and Assiut 125</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Treat.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CuSO<sub>4 </sub>(ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Soluble protein</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cv. Assiut 84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Root</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stem</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Leaves</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >116.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >CuSO<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.33**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.15**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >117.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.64</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.09**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.66**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.12**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.36**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.81**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.03**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >CuSO<sub>4</sub> + IAA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.27**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >153.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.04**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >189.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >170.96**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >146.38</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.54**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >158.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >115.77**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >233.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >199.04**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >170.42</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101.54**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >166.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108.85**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >219.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >209.62**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >179.48</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.23**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >163.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >210.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200.77**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >171.91</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >L. S. D. 0.05%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cv. Assiut 125</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >CuSO<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.15**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.08**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >123.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.08**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.13**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.00**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.31**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.27**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.25**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >142.31**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >180.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >CuSO<sub>4</sub> + IAA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.19**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >249.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >106.54**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >375.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >190.58**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >242.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.12**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >240.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110.00**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >387.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >172.89**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >219.59</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.04**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >230.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.31**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >290.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >151.15**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >191.99</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.46**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >228.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.00**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >264.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >158.08**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200.78</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >L. S. D. 0.05%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>**Highly significance compared with control plants.</p><p>Cu<sup>++</sup> the percent reduction in potassium content in roots, stems and leaves was 29.1%, 45.4% and 16.1% respectively, which indicated that stems were more responding to Cu<sup>2+</sup> while leaves were the least responding, roots were intermediate. The data reveal that the Cu<sup>2+</sup> treatments enhanced the calcium accumulation in roots, stems and leaves of cv. Assiut 84 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). This stimulatory effect on the calcium content was more pronounced in roots than in the other two plant organs. At the level of 350 ppm the percent of increase was 60%, 27.8% and 26.7% in roots, stems and leaves respectively. The data reveal that treatment with Cu<sup>2+</sup> retarded the transport and accumulation of calcium in the different organs of the broad bean cultivar Assiut 125 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). This inhibitory effect was much more pronounced in roots than in stems or leaves, especially at the lower doses of Cu<sup>2+</sup>. However, the harmful effect of the highest dose of Cu<sup>2+</sup> on calcium transport seemed to be more or less similar in the three plant organs. At the level of 350 ppm Cu<sup>++</sup> the calcium content in roots, stems and leaves was 57.14%, 66.67% and 63.16% respectively. In cv. Assiut 84 the data revealed that Cu<sup>2+</sup> up to the level of 100 ppm induced insignificant changes in magnesium</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of CuSO<sub>4</sub> and CuSO<sub>4</sub> plus IAA treatments on potassium content (mg. g.<sup>-1</sup> d. m.) in the different organs of the broad bean cultivar Assiut 84 and Assiut 125</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Treatment</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CuSO<sub>4</sub> (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Root</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Stem</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Leaves</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >CuSO<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.9**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.9**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.76</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.2**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.7**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.6**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.1**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.19</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >CuSO<sub>4</sub> + IAA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.62</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.4**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.9**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >113.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.1**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >104.79</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.0**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >132.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.6**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >144.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.1**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.8**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >128.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.3**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >125.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >L. S. D. 0.05%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cv. Assiut 125</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >CuSO<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.8**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.26</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.1**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.9**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.8**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.41</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.4**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.1**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.3**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.98</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >CuSO<sub>4</sub> + IAA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.3**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.**1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.2*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.2**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >107.77</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.4**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.6**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.8*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.8**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.41</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >L. S. D. 0.05%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>**Highly significance compared with control plants.</p><p>in roots (100% of control), then a slight reduction was obtained (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>). This reduction was consistent at the levels from 200 ppm to 350 ppm Cu<sup>++</sup> (about 15%). In stems, unexpected promotion in magnesium content was recorded. It was 134.04%, 134.04% and 210.64% of the control at the levels of 100 ppm, 200 ppm and 350 ppm Cu<sup>++</sup> respectively. In leaves, magnesium contents remained mostly around those of control plants even at the highest dose of copper. In cv. Assiut 125 the data exhibited that the level of 100 ppm Cu<sup>++</sup> induced mostly insignificant changes in magnesium content in the three plant organs, then a gradual reduction was reported by the further increase in Cu<sup>2+</sup> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>). The percent of this reduction varied among the three tested plant organs. At the level of 350 ppm Cu<sup>++</sup>, the percent of reduction was 35.3%, 46.3% and 55.2% in roots, stems and leaves respectively.</p>Interaction of Cu<sup>2+</sup> with IAA<p>A remarked and progressive accumulation in dry matter yields was exhibited when the Cu<sup>++</sup>-treated plants were sprayed by 200 ppm IAA (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). This stimulatory effect was much more pronounced in stems and leaves than in roots of two tested cultivars. The leaf area of cv. Assiut 84 increased from 0 to 350 ppm</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of CuSO<sub>4</sub> and CuSO<sub>4</sub> plus IAA treatments on calcium content (mg. g.<sup>-1</sup> d. m.) in the different organs of the broad bean cultivars Assiut 84 and Assiut 125</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CuSO<sub>4</sub> (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Root</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Stem</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Leaves</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cv. Assiut 84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >CuSO<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.25**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >116.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.75**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >166.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.25**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >138.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.25**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >135.56</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.75**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >127.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.25**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >126.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >CuSO<sub>4</sub> + IAA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.9**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.1**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >157.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.75**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.75**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >113.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.6**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >176</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.2**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >137.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.0**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >133.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.75**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >180</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >144.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.0**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >L. S. D. 0.05%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cv. Assiut 125</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >CuSO<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.75**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.75**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.0**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.75**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.0**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.0**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >CuSO<sub>4</sub> + IAA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.5**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.74</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.75**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.5**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >115.79</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >133.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.75**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.47</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.75**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >L. S. D. 0.05%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>**Highly significance compared with control plants.</p><p>Cu<sup>++</sup>. Then a slight reduction was exhibited only at the highest dose of Cu<sup>++</sup> (about 15%). A marked and progressive increase in leaf area was exhibited as a result of IAA treatment in cv. Assiut 84 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Also, the slight reduction in leaf area at the level of 350 ppm Cu<sup>++</sup> was completely eliminated by IAA treatment. Moreover, the leaf area increased by 14.42% as a result of 350 ppm Cu<sup>++</sup> and IAA treatments. Hormonal treatments completely alleviated the drastic effect of the higher doses of Cu<sup>++</sup> on the leaf area of cv. Assiut 125. Again, the data of leaf area indicated the superiority of cv. Assiut 84 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). A marked and progressive additional increase in these values was exhibited as a result of IAA treatments, whatever the level of Cu<sup>++</sup> used and the fraction of the photosynthetic pigment analyzed in cv. Assiut 84 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(a)). Interestingly, the contents of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotenoids was about 2-fold those of control as a result of 350 ppm Cu<sup>++</sup> plus IAA. A marked and progressive accumulation in the photosynthetically active pigments was obtained when the Cu<sup>2+</sup>-affected plants were sprayed by IAA in cv. Assiut 125 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(b)). This promoting effect was more pronounced in carotenoids and chlorophyll a than in chlorophyll b at most Cu<sup>2+</sup> levels. At the level of 350 ppm Cu<sup>++</sup> plus IAA the percent of increase in chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotenoids was 46.9%, 0.0% and 66.1%, respectively. In roots and stems of cv. Assiut 84 the</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of CuSO<sub>4</sub> and CuSO<sub>4</sub> plus IAA treatments on magnesium content (mg. g.<sup>-1</sup> d. m.) in the different organs of the broad bean cultivars Assiut 84 and Assiut 125</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Treatment</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Root</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Stem</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Leaves</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cv. Assiut 84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >CuSO<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.15**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >134.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.4**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >116.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.6**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.15**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >134.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.92</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.6**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.95**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >210.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101.39</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >CuSO<sub>4</sub> + IAA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.85**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.4**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >229.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.65**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >106.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.6**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >233.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.2**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >306.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.15**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >168.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.45**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >341.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >382.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.35**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >143.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.1**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >316.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.45**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >402.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.9**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >137.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >L. S. D. 0.05%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cv. Assiut125</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >CuSO<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.45**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >123.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.25**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.3**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.25**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.1**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.95**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.45**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.85**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.83</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >CuSO<sub>4</sub> + IAA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.7**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >152.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >166.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.55**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103.83</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.35**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >252.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.9**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >366.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.45**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >123.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.85**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >216.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.5**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.79</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.55**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >111.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.85**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >216.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.8**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.42</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >L. S. D. 0.05%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>**Highly significance compared with control plants.</p><p>soluble carbohydrate fraction seemed to be more or less unchanged with a general tendency to decrease especially at the severe dose of Cu<sup>++</sup> level as a result of IAA treatment (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). In leaves the soluble carbohydrates increased progressively, elevated at the levels of 100 ppm and 200 ppm Cu<sup>++</sup> and remained more or less unchanged at the level of 350 ppm Cu<sup>++</sup> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). In cv. Assiut 84 considerable production of proteins was recorded in roots, stems and leaves of the Cu<sup>++</sup>-affected broad bean as a result of phytohormonal treatment, approached 2-fold, especially in roots and stems (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). Phytohoromonal treatment resulted in a marked and progressive accumulation in soluble carbohydrates and soluble proteins content in roots, stems and leaves in cv. Assiut 125 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). Hormonal treatments considerably accumulated potassium in roots and stems of cv. Assiut 84 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). At the level of 350 ppm Cu<sup>++</sup>, the percent of increase in potassium content in roots and stems was 28% and 57% respectively when compared with the absolute control samples. In leaves, IAA completely alleviated the drastic effect of Cu<sup>2+</sup> on potassium content (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). Hormonal treatments completely alleviated the harmful effects of Cu<sup>2+</sup> on the absorption and accumulation of potassium, whatever the concentration of Cu<sup>2+</sup> used in cv. Assiut 125. Interestingly, in cv. Assiut 84 the pattern of changes in calcium content seemed to take place when the Cu<sup>++</sup>-affected plants were sprayed by IAA (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). Moreover, there is some additional activation in the absorption and accumulation of calcium, especially in leaves. IAA improved in cv. Assiut 125 the absorption and accumulation of calcium and the drastic effect of Cu<sup>2+</sup> on calcium content was completely ameliorated as a result of IAA treatments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). A surprising accumulation of magnesium was exhibited when this cultivar was sprayed by IAA in cv. Assiut 84 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>). This was much more pronounced in roots and stems than in leaves. At the level of 350 ppm Cu<sup>++</sup> the percent of increase in magnesium was 216.67%, 302.13% and 37.5% in roots, stems and leaves respectively. A highly significant increase in magnesium content in roots and stems of cv. Assiut 125 was obtained under IAA treatment (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>). This stimulatory effect in magnesium content was much more pronounced in stems than in roots. At the level of 200 ppm Cu<sup>++</sup> the percent of increase was 23.53% and 116.67% in roots and stems respectively. In leaves, the drastic effect of Cu<sup>2+</sup> on magnesium content was eliminated by IAA treatment, whatever the level of Cu<sup>2+</sup> used (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Discussion</title><p>The data of the dry matter exhibited the biphasic effect of copper on the growth criteria of the two broad bean cultivars. While the lower and moderate doses of Cu<sup>2+</sup> (100 ppm and 200 ppm) stimulated the growth of the two cultivars, the higher dose revealed the opposite event where the growth dropped in both cultivars. The growth stimulation caused by the lower and moderate doses of Cu<sup>2+</sup> was more pronounced in cv. Assiut 84 than in cv. Assiut 125 and also at the higher Cu<sup>2+</sup> concentration the growth dropped slightly in cv. Assiut 84 and highly significantly in cv. Assiut 125. Accordingly, the cv. Assiut 84 was considered as a Cu<sup>2+</sup>-tolerant cultivar while the cv. Assiut 125 was the Cu<sup>2+</sup>-sensitive. Such biphasic responses to Cu<sup>2+</sup> were also revealed by other investigators Fageria (2002); Gao et al. (2008) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref29">29</xref>] using upland rice and Jatropha curcas L. seedlings respectively. The lethal doses of Cu<sup>2+</sup> were recorded to differ among species and varieties. While Deef (2007) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref30">30</xref>] reported that the biomass production of Cu<sup>2+</sup>-treated Rosmarinus officinalis plants increased at lower treatments (100 to 200 ppm) and decreased gradually above 800 ppm Cu<sup>++</sup>. Lara and Luca (2005) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref31">31</xref>] reported that the peach rootstock Prunus cerasifera Mr.S. 2/5 plantlets grown in vitro on media containing either 10 or 50 μM of CuSO<sub>4</sub> did not show any visible signs of copper toxicity. At the higher Cu<sup>2+</sup> concentration (100 μM of CuSO<sub>4</sub>), Cu<sup>2+</sup> toxicity symptoms appeared on the older leaves. In the present work, the differential responses to the different Cu<sup>2+</sup> concentrations were not only observed between the two broad bean cultivars but also among their plant organs. At the level of 350 ppm Cu<sup>++</sup>, the percent of reduction in dry weight of roots and stems of the cv. Assiut 84 was 74.13 % and 79.23% of control, respectively, which means that the roots and stems responded almost similarly (26% and 21% reduction, respectively), yet the root is more sensitive. Surprisingly, in leaves of this cultivar some promotion rather than inhibition was recorded (about 4% of control) at the same Cu<sup>++</sup> level. In cv. Assiut 125 some differences were observed. At the level of 350 ppm, the percent of reduction in roots was 41% and in stems and leaves it was around 30%, which means that: The great inhibition was obtained in roots, stems and leaves responded similarly (30% of control). Thus, the responses to Cu<sup>2+</sup> treatments differed greatly among the two cultivars and even among their plant organs. If we take into consideration the relation between growth and Cu<sup>2+</sup> concentration, one can say that in cv. Assiut 84 the toxic ion effect was more or less similar in roots and stems and there is no toxic ion effect in leaves (promotion rather than inhibition), which probably means that the received amount of Cu<sup>2+</sup> in leaves was much less than in roots or stems. This cultivar restricted the amount of Cu<sup>2+</sup> transported to the leaves in order to maintain it as a micronutrient rather than inhibitor. There is also evidence that Cu<sup>2+</sup> should be excluded from the leaves because of its inhibitory function against photosynthesis (Graham, 1981) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref32">32</xref>] . Other situation was exhibited in cv. Assiut 125. The Cu<sup>2+</sup> might be distributed similarly in stems and leaves (as the percent of reduction was more or less similar) while the highest accumulation of Cu<sup>2+</sup> was in roots. It has been demonstrated that an excess of Cu<sup>2+</sup> can inhibit the growth of young seedling, root elongation and cause damage to root epidermal cells and root cell membranes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref33">33</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref34">34</xref>] . The differential effect of Cu<sup>2+</sup> on root and shoot growth could be accounted for by the fact that Cu<sup>2+</sup> is accumulated mainly in roots and to a minor extent in shoots [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref35">35</xref>] . In our study, an interesting point was also reported, that the role of Cu<sup>2+</sup> as a fertilizer was more obvious than its toxicity. At the level of 200 ppm Cu<sup>++</sup> the dry matter yield exceeded by more than 55% in the leaves of cv. Assiut 84 and by more than 31% of control in the leaves of cv. Assiut 125. This indicates the deficiency of Cu<sup>2+</sup> as a micronutrient in the cultivated soil. Beneficial effect of Cu<sup>++</sup> on yield of annual crops has been reported by Galr&#227;o (1999); Ursuzula (2008) and Diaz et al. (2017) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref36">36</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref37">37</xref>] . Also, Fageria (2002) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref28">28</xref>] reported that Cu<sup>2+</sup> fertilization increases dry matter yield of upland rice and common bean. The concentrations of the photosynthetic pigments varied among the two broad bean genotypes as well as among the used concentrations of Cu<sup>2+</sup>. Our data revealed that Cu<sup>2+</sup> treatment stimulated the synthesis of the photosynthetically active pigments even at the highest dose of Cu<sup>2+</sup>. This was more pronounced in cv. Assiut 84 than cv. Assiut 125. However, there is some reduction in chlorophyll b content in cv. Assiut 125 at the highest Cu<sup>2+</sup> dose. Diaz et al. (2017) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref3">3</xref>] showed that 50 &#181;M and 100 &#181;M of Cu<sup>2+</sup> concentration induced a significant reduction in chlorophyll a content and exhibited oxidative stress evaluated through an increase in malondialdehyde levels on C. quitensis seedlings in vitro. Interestingly, the concentrations of photosynthetic pigments, especially in cv. Assiut 84, are not relative to the growth criteria particularly in roots and stems and also to some extent in cv. Assiut 125. However, pigments contents are in direct relationship with the metabolic rate (carbohydrates and proteins) in most cases. Thus, the relationship between growth and photosynthetic pigments as well as the production of metabolites of the two tested broad bean cultivars seemed to be complicated. Fagrasova (2001) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref38">38</xref>] who reported that growth was more sensitive to Cu<sup>2+</sup> than chlorophyll synthesis. Additionally, the considerable improvement of growth criteria of the two broad bean cultivars under IAA treatment was also associated by a marked and progressive increase in chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotenoids, which was more obvious in carotenoids. There is a big difference in the accumulation and distribution of carbohydrates among the two broad bean cultivars and even among the different organs of the same cultivar, as well as the concentrations of Cu<sup>2+</sup> used. In cv. Assiut 84, the Cu<sup>2+</sup> treatment stimulated the production of carbohydrates whatever the concentration of Cu<sup>2+</sup> and the plant organ tested. This accumulation was much higher in roots (about 100% increases in comparison with the absolute control at the highest Cu<sup>2+</sup> dose) than stems or leaves. In cv. Assiut 125, while leaves and roots maintained carbohydrates contents around the control values, in stems, a marked and progressive accumulation of carbohydrates was recorded (about 50% over the control). In general, cv. Assiut 84 was the carbohydrates accumulator in comparison with cv. Assiut 125 (the Cu<sup>2+</sup>-sensitive cultivar), whatever the plant organ tested and the level of Cu<sup>2+</sup> used. Accordingly, the differences in the accumulation of carbohydrates among the two broad bean cultivars and among their plant organs might be used as a suitable selection criterion for Cu<sup>2+</sup> tolerance of the two broad bean cultivars. Such contrasting results of Cu<sup>2+</sup> effects on carbohydrates metabolism were also found by Deef (2007) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref30">30</xref>] who studied the effect of different concentrations of Cu<sup>2+</sup> on Rosmarinus officinalis and reported that all carbohydrates fractions increased under Cu<sup>2+</sup> treatments until 200 ppm as compared with control. In cv. Assiut 84 the accumulation of proteins in leaves is opposite to the carbohydrates whose highest accumulation was located in roots. Is there a correlation between the huge accumulation of carbohydrates in roots and the production of energy needed for the active absorption of ions from the soil? Also, is there a correlation between the huge accumulation of proteins in leaves and the defense mechanisms adopted by this cultivar, particularly when taken into consideration the highly significant accumulation of the photosynthetic pigments in the leaves of this cultivar? Diaz et al. (2017) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref3">3</xref>] evaluated the effect of Cu<sup>2+</sup> (II) ions (control, 100 and 500 μM) on C. quitensis seedlings in vitro, determining morpho-physiological and biochemical variables. Cu<sup>2+</sup> showed a significantly negative effect on the development of new shoots (500 μM) and floral apex appearance (100 μM). The analyzed Cu<sup>++</sup> concentrations significantly affected leaf and root length and induced a significant increase in guaiacol peroxidase (G POD) enzyme activity. The highest proline accumulation took place in seedlings subjected to 500 μM. This is the first study to demonstrate evidence of Cu<sup>2+</sup> effects on morphological, physiological and biochemical variables in C. quitensis. Vuksanović et al. (2017) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref39">39</xref>] study five different European black poplar (Populusnigra L.) genotypes were studied in vitro for their tolerance to Cu<sup>2+</sup> based on morphological parameters, biomass accumulation and pigment content, as well as Cu<sup>2+</sup> accumulation in aboveground plant parts. Also, the effect of the pH of the medium and Cu<sup>2+</sup> concentration was examined in order to optimize the evaluation of Cu<sup>2+</sup> tolerance in vitro. Hamdia et al. (2017) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref13">13</xref>] showed that response of wheat plants to different osmotic stress levels varied among the different organs root, shoot and spike and the situation of these organs with application of two Cu<sup>2+</sup> levels 5 mM and 25 mM as CuSO<sub>4</sub>. Data also showed further stimulatory effect on growth parameters by Cu<sup>2+</sup> applications with either concentration (7.5 mM or 25 mM). Irrigating the soil with either 7.5 or 25 mM CuSO<sub>4</sub> induced a huge accumulation in soluble sugar, soluble protein and nitrate reductase. Hamdia (2017) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref40">40</xref>] study interactive effect of different Cu<sup>2+</sup> concentrations (5 mM, 10 mM, 20 mM and 25 mM) and treatments with biofertilizers Azospirillum brasilense on growth, metabolites, minerals and osmotic pressure of wheat plants was investigated. Shoots and roots of wheat plant were differentially response to Cu<sup>2+</sup> treatments, while shoot organ response positively to this treatment, root response negatively. The positive effect of Cu<sup>2+</sup> in shoot organ was concomitant with the increase in the production of fresh, dry matter, length and water content and this related with the accumulation of soluble sugar, soluble protein and mineral as a result of increasing osmotic pressure. On the other side, the negative effect of Cu<sup>2+</sup> on root organ was concomitant with the decrease in production of fresh, dry matter, length and water content that related with the reduction in the accumulation of soluble sugar and mineral with the insignificant change in osmotic pressure. It is worthy to mention that while the cv. Assiut 84 controlled the interconversion between carbon and nitrogen at any concentration of Cu<sup>2+</sup>, in cv. Assiut 125 some disturbances were recorded, that while the carbohydrates contents increased in some plant organs, the protein contents decreased slightly. This leads us to point out that the heavy metal tolerance was linked with equilibrium in the conversion between carbohydrates and nitrogen metabolism while heavy metal injury leads to the disturbance among the two components [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref40">40</xref>] . When the plants of cv. Assiut 84 and cv. Assiut 125 were sprayed by IAA the concentration of both carbohydrates and proteins were stimulated considerably parallel to the observed stimulation in the growth criteria of the two tested cultivars as a result of IAA treatment. It can be pointed out that there is a close correlation between the growth criteria and carbohydrates and proteins metabolism, which depends upon the activity of the photosynthetic apparatus as well as the green area and the machinery of water flow (the growth of roots was considerably stimulated by IAA treatment).The differences in the responses to Cu<sup>2+</sup> among the two selected broad bean cultivars were mirrored by the differences in the absorption, accumulation and compartmentation of potassium, calcium and magnesium in the different organs of the two cultivars. Our data reveal that while Cu<sup>2+</sup> had a marked stimulatory effect in the absorption and accumulation of calcium in the different organs of cv. Assiut 84, it, on the other hand, significantly inhibited the accumulation of this cation in the different organs of cv. Assiut 125. Moreover, the absolute amount of calcium was markedly higher in cv. Assiut 84 than in cv. Assiut 125, whatever the plant organ tested. Also while Cu<sup>2+</sup>-stressed cv. Assiut 84 maintained potassium and magnesium levels around the control values and some promotion occurred especially in roots and stems, these cations dropped markedly in cv. Assiut 125 as a result of Cu<sup>2+</sup> treatments. Also, as in the case of calcium, the highest amount of absorbed potassium and magnesium achieved into the leaves of the two broad bean cultivars. This uphill movement of potassium and magnesium was more pronounced in cv. Assiut 125 than cv. Assiut 84. Similary, Fageria, 2002 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref28">28</xref>] working on the effect of various levels of Cu<sup>2+</sup> on rice and bean plants, reported that while Cu<sup>2+</sup> decreased the concentration of calcium and magnesium in rice, it, on the other hand, induced insignificant changes in these cations in bean plants. Deef (2007) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref30">30</xref>] reported that increasing Cu<sup>2+</sup> concentration from 50 to 3200 ppm in the medium decreased the nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium and iron content of Rosmarinus officinalis shoot system. The low rate in the absorption of potassium, calcium and magnesium in cv. Assiut 125 when compared to cv. Assiut 84 might be linked with the differences in the biomass content of the roots among the two cultivars. The high absorption zone of cv. Assiut 84 might permit this cultivar to absorb a sufficient amount of macronutrients and also to force up these elements to the leaves which in turn share in the high affinity of the reactive center of the photosynthetic apparatus and consequently the manufacture of carbon and nitrogen and equilibration among the two components. Deef (2007) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref30">30</xref>] attributed the reduction in the absorbance of cations to the competition among them. This is not the case in our study. The antagonistic effect theory also seems to be problematical. This is supported by the results obtained by Gareia-Legaz et al. (2005) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref41">41</xref>] who reported that in rice there was no correlation in potassium and sodium transport and concluded that the genes affecting sodium uptake had not apparently co-segregated with those involved with potassium uptake. This theory was also recommended when the Cu<sup>2+</sup> stressed plants sprayed with IAA where a lot of these cations were transported in the same trend from the soil solution into the different parts of the two broad bean plants without any competition among these cations. The uptake, translocation and distribution of mineral ions are affected by various growth regulators among others by IAA. These effects can be evoked by changes in the rate of photosynthesis of a new biomass [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref13">13</xref>] . Massoud et al. (2018) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87605-ref42">42</xref>] stdudy the mehanisms of Cu<sup>2+</sup> alleviation toxicity in germinating pea seeds by IAA, GA<sub>3</sub>, Ca and citric acid. This strategy might be important in heavy metals tolerance mechanisms of crop plants (the sufficient amount of elements and the huge accumulation of them in leaves) which might be evoked up the machinery of water flow from the soil solution into the aerial parts of the plants. Ion regulation is an essential factor of the mechanisms of heavy metals tolerance.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>My greet loving Prof Dr. Hamdia for all member of my family (Father M. Abd El-Samad, mother Karema Kotob, Brother Ahmed and Naema sister) which encouragements.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Abd El-Samad, H.M., Shaddad, M.A.K. and Abd El-Hakeem, K.N. (2018) The Potential Role of Cu<sup>2+</sup> and Combined Action with IAA on Tolerance Strategy of Two Broad Bean Cultivars. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 9, 2100-2119. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2018.910153</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.87605-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ducic, T. and Polle, A. (2005) Transport and Detoxification of Manganese and Copper in Plants. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology, 17, 103-112. https://www.scielo.br/pdf/bjpp/v17n1/a09v17n1.pdf https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-04202005000100009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Marschner, H. (2011) Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. 3rd Edition, Academic Press, 672 p. https://www.elsevier.com/books/marschners-mineral-nutrition-of-higher-plants/marschner/978-0-12-384905-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Díaz, C.M., Marin, C., Astel, K., Machuca, A. and Rifo, S. (2017) Effect of Copper (II) Ions on Morpho-Physiological and Biochemical Variables in Colobanthus quitensis. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 17, 429-440. https://scielo.conicyt.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0718-95162017000200012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Violante, A., Cozzolino, V., Perelomov, L., Caporale, A.G. and Pigna, M. (2010) Mobility and Bioavailability of Heavy Metals and Metalloids in Soil Environments. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 10, 268-292. https://hero.epa.gov/hero/index.cfm/reference/details/.../1354796</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wuana, R.A. and Okieimen, F.E. (2011) Heavy Metals in Contaminated Soils: A Review of Sources, Chemistry, Risks and Best Available Strategies for Remediation. ISRN Ecology, Article ID: 402647, 20 p. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258402869_Heavy_Metals_in_Contaminated_Soils_A_Review_of_Sources_Chemistry_Risks_and_Best_Available_Strategies_for_Remediation</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Joshi, D., Srivastava, P.C., Dwivedi, R., Pachauri, S.P. and Shukla, A.K. (2015) Chemical Speciation and Suitability of Soil Extractants for Assessing Cu Availability to Maize (Zea mays L.) in Acidic Soils. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 15, 1024-1034. https://scielo.conicyt.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0718-95162015000400016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yruela, I. (2009) Copper in Plants: Acquisition, Transport and Interactions. Functional Plant Biology, 36, 409-430. https://www.researchgate.net</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sommer, L.A. (1931) Copper as an Essential for Plant Growth. Plant Physiology, 6, 339-345. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC440099/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sharma, P., Jha, A.B., Dubey, R.S. and Pessarakli, M. (2012) Reactive Oxygen Species, Oxidative Damage, and Antioxidative Defense Mechanism in Plants under Stressful Conditions. Journal of Botany, 2012, Article ID: 217037, 26 p. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jb/2012/217037/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sreekanth, T.V., Nagajyoti, P.C., Lee, K.D. and Prasad, T.N. (2013) Occurrence, Physiological Responses and Toxicity of Nickel in Plants. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 10, 1129-1140. https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/63485/1/st13099.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pilon M., Abdel-Ghany, S.E., Cohu, C.M., Gogolin, K.A. and Ye, H. (2006) Copper Cofactor Delivery in Plant Cells. Current Opinion of Plant Biology, 9, 1-8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17263774 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2006.03.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Puig, S., Andrés-Colás, N., García-Molina, A. and Pe&amp;ntilde;arrubia, L. (2007) Copper and Iron Homeostasis in Arabidopsis: Responses to Metal Deficiencies, Interactions and Biotechnological Applications. Plant Cell and Environment, 30, 271-290. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17263774 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01642.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hamdia, M.A., Mostafa, D. and Al-Hakim, K.N. (2017) The Combined Action Strategy of Two Stresses, Salinity and Cu++ on Growth, Metabolites and Protein Pattern of Wheat Plant. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 8, 625-643. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ajps https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2017.83043</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dey, S., Mazumder, P.B. and Paul, S.B. (2014) Effect of Copper on Growth and Chlorophyll Content in Tea Plants (Camellia sinensis L.) O. Kuntze). International Journal of Research in Applied, Natural and Social Sciences, 2, 223-230. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265596432_EFFECT_OF_COPPER_ON_GROWTH_AND_CHLOROPHYLL_CONTENT_IN_TEA_PLANTS_CAMELLIA_SINENSIS_L_O_KUNTZE</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Neto, L.B., Pativa, A.L. and Pinheiro, M.M. (2017) Interaction between Plant Hormones and Heavy Metals Responses. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 40, 373-386. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2016-0087</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ochoa, L., Mena, N.Z., Vello, A.M., Margez, J.P., Bidea, J.R. and Torresdey, J.L. (2018) Copper Oxide Nanoparticles and Bulk Copper Oxide, Combined with Indole-3-Acetic Acid, Alter Aluminum, Boron, and Iron in Pisum sativum Seeds. Science of the Total Environment, 634, 1238-1245. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rabey, J.M., Shabtai, H., Graff, E. and Korczyn, A.D. (1992) Improvement of Parkinsonian Features Correlate with High Plasma Levodopa Values after Broad Bean (Viciafaba) Consumption. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 55, 725-727. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC489215/ https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.55.8.725</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Elwakil, M.A., El-Refai, I.M., Awadallah, O.A., El-Metwally, M.A. and Mohammed, M.S. (2009) Seed-Borne Pathogens of Faba Bean in Egypt: Detection and Pathogencity. Plant Pathology Journal, 8, 90-97. https://scialert.net/fulltextmobile/?doi=ppj.2009.90.97</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brady, N.C. and Weil, R.R. (2002) The Nature and Properties of Soil. 13th Edition, Prentice Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River, 960 p. http://www.scirp.org/%28S%28351jmbntvnsjt1aadkposzje%29%29/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1853103</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Tibbits, T.W. and Langhans, R.W. (1993) Controlled-Environment Studies. In: Hall, D.O., Scur, R.W., Lock, J.M., Bolhar-Nordenkampf, H.R., Leegoood, R.C. and Long, S.P., Eds., Photosynthesis and Production in a Changing Environment, Chapman &amp; Hall, London, 65-78. https://www.google.com.eg/search?q=Tibbits,+T.+W.+and+Langhans,+R.+W.+%281993%29ControlledEnvironment+Studies.+In:+Hall,+D.O.,+Scur,+R.W.,+Lock,+J.M.,+Bolhar</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Watson, D.J. and Watson, M.A. (1953) Comparative Physiological Studies of Field Crops. III. The Effect of Infection with Beet Yellows and Mosaic Viruses on the Growth and Yield of the Sugar Beet Root Crop. Annals of Applied Biology, 40, 1–37. https://www.researchgate.net/journal/0003-4746_Annals_of_Applied_Biology</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Metzner, H., Rau, H. and Senger, H. (1965) Untersuchungen Zur Synchronisierbar Kein Einzelner Pigmentmangel-Mutanten von Chlorella. Planta, 65, 186-194. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384998</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fales, F.W. (1951) The Assimilation and Degradation of Carbohydrate by Yeast Cells. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 193, 113-124. http://www.jbc.org/content/193/1/113.full.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lowery, O.H., Rasebrough, N.J., Farr, A.L. and Randall, R.J. (1951) Protein Measurement with the Folin Phenol Reagent. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 193, 291-297. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journal_of_Biological_Chemistry</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schwarzenbach, G. and Biedermann, W. (1948) Komplexone, X. Erdalkalikomplexevono, 0,6-Dioxyazofarbstoffen. Helvetica Chimica Acta, 31, 678-687. https://doi.org/10.1002/hlca.19480310303</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Williams, V. and Twine, S. (1960) Flame Photometric Method for Sodium, Potassium and Calcium. In: Peach, K. and Tracey, M.V., Eds., Modem Methods of Plant Analysis, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Vol. 5, 3-5. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Williams_Brothers22</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Steel, R.G. and Torrie, J.H. (1960) Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York. http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/classics1977/A1977DU23500002.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fageria, N.K., Baligar, V.C. and Clark, R.B. (2002) Micronutrients in Crop Production. Advances in Agronomy, 77, 189-272. https://www.agronomy-journal.org/articles/agro/ref/2010/01/a8230/a8230.htm</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gao, S., Yan, R., Cao, M., Yang, W., Wang, S. and Chen, F. (2008) Effects of Copper on Growth, Antioxidant Enzymes and Phenylalanine Ammonia-Lyase Activities in Jatroph acurcus L. Seedlings. Plant, Soil and Environment, 54, 117-127. https://www.agriculturejournals.cz/publicFiles/01027.pdf https://doi.org/10.17221/2688-PSE</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Deef, H.E. (2007) Cupper Treatments and Their Effects on Growth, Carbohydrates, Minerals and Essential Oils Contents of Rosmarinus officinalis L. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 3, 322-328. https://www.idosi.org/wjas/wjas3(3)/10.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lara, L. and Luca, S. (2000) Copper Toxicity in Pinus cerasifera: Growth and Antioxidant Enzymes Responses of in Vitro Grown Plants. Plant Science, 168, 797-802. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/.../f4988090cda3983c1b356a5ecd11d54e253a.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Graham, R.D. (1981) Absorption of Copper by Plant Roots. In: Loneragan, J.F., Robson, A.D. and Graham, R.D., Eds., Copper in Soils and Plants, Academic Press, New York, 141-163. https://www.nal.usda.gov/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xiong, Z.T. and Wang, H. (205) Copper Toxicity and Bioaccumulation in Chinese Cabbage (Brassica pekinensis Rup.). Environmental Toxicology, 20, 188-194. https://pdfs.semanticsscholar.org</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tanyolac, D., Ekmekci, Y. and Unalan, S. (2007) Changes in Photochemical and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities in Maize (Zea mays L.) Leaves Exposed to Excess Copper. Chemosphere, 67, 89-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.09.052</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fernades, J.C. and Henriques, F.S. (1991) Biochemical, Physiological and Structural Effects of Excess Copper in Plants. The Botanical Review, 57, 246-273. https://link.springer.com</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Galrao, E.Z. (1999) Métodos de aplica&amp;atilde;o de cobre e avalia&amp;atilde;o da disponibilidadeparaasojanum Latossolo Vermelho Amarelofranco-argilo-arenosofasecerrado. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo Viosa MG, 23, 265-272. https://www.scielo.brscielopid=S0100-068 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06831999000200010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Urszula</surname><given-names> S.C. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2008</year>)<article-title>Effect of Foliar and Soil Application of Copper on the Level and Quality of Winter Rapeseed Yields</article-title><source> Journal of Elementology</source><volume> 13</volume>,<fpage> 615</fpage>-<lpage>623</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fagrasova, A. (2001) Interactive Effect of Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Copper I and II and Vanadium on the Freshwater Alga Scenedesmus quadricauda. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 67, 688-695. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s001280178.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vuksanovic, V., Kova?evic, B., Katanic, M., Orlovic, S. and Miladinovic, D. (2017) In Vitro Evaluation of Copper Tolerance and Accumulation in Populusnigra. Archives of Biological Sciences, 69, 679-687. https://doi.org/10.2298/ABS170210014Vhttp://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0354-4664/2017/0354-46641700014V.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hamdia, M.A. (2017) The Biphasic Role of Cupper and Counteraction with Azospirillum brasilense Application on Growth, Metabolities, Osmotic Pressure and Mineral of Wheat Plant. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 8, 1182-1195. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ajps https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2017.85078</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gareia-Legaz, M.F., Lopez-Gomez, E., Mataix-Beneyto, J., Torrecillas, A. and Sanchez-Blanco, M.J. (2005) Effects of Salinity and Rootstock on Growth, Water Relations, Nutrition and Gas Exchange of Loquat. Journal of Horticultural Science, 80, 199-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2005.11511917</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87605-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Massoud, B.M., Karmous, I., El Ferjani, E. and, Chaoui, A. (2018) Alleviation of Copper Toxicity in Germinating Pea Seeds by IAA, GA3, Ca and Citric Acid. Journal of Plant Interactions, 3, 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2017.1410733</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>