<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">SS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Surgical Science</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2157-9407</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ss.2018.99035</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">SS-87346</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Postoperative Occlusion of the Small Bowel with Flanges and/or Adhesions in General Surgery of Kati BSS CHU
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Abdoulaye</surname><given-names>Diarra</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Koniba</surname><given-names>Keita</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Amadou</surname><given-names>Traoré</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Assitan</surname><given-names>Koné</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Issa</surname><given-names>Traore</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Idrissa</surname><given-names>Tounkara</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Abdoulaye</surname><given-names>Kante</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fadima</surname><given-names>K. Tall</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Daouda</surname><given-names>Diallo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Moustaph</surname><given-names>Issa Magané</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Madiassa</surname><given-names>Konate</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Aboubacar</surname><given-names>Koné</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Deborah</surname><given-names>Sanra Sanogo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ismaël</surname><given-names>Konare</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Alhassane</surname><given-names>Traoré</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Anesthesia Service and Resuscitation Department, Kati, Mali</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Gastroenterology Department, Kati, Mali</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>General Surgery Department, Kati, Mali</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>10</day><month>09</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>09</issue><fpage>293</fpage><lpage>299</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>18,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2018</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>14,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2018</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>17,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2018</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Objectives were to determine the frequency, describe the epidemiological and clinical aspects, therapeutic and analyze the postoperative course. 
  Methodology: This was a retrospective study that covered 08 years (January 2009-December 2017). Inclusion criteria: all patients operated for obstruction of the small bowel by hail and/or flanging. Exclusion criteria: other types of occlusion and non-operated patients. 
  Result: We recorded a total of 162 cases of hail obstruction by adhesions and/or flanges at 2.87%. The average age was 32.04, the sex ratio was 1.2. The average consultation time was 4 days. Abdominal pain associated with stopping of material and gas was present in all our patients. X-ray of the abdomen without preparation carried out in all the patients made it possible to objectify in 150 patients (92.6%) of the hydro-hail levels. Inoperative occlusion of hail on flange was present in 80 patients (49.4%). Occlusion of the small bowel on flange and adhesion was present in 69 patients. Adhesion obstruction of hail accounted for 6.8% (11 cases). The most commonly used surgical technique was flange resection in 91 patients (56.2%). The follow-up was simple in 151 patients (93.2%). Mortality was 1.2% of cases, 
  i.e. 2 deaths. The average duration of hospitalization was 6 days. 
  Conclusion: Occlusion of the small bowel by flanging and/or adherence is a surgical emergency whose prognosis depends on early management.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Postoperative Occlusion</kwd><kwd> Hail</kwd><kwd> Bridle/Adherence</kwd><kwd> Mali</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Post-operative occlusions by flange and/or adhesions constitute a surgical emergency. They represent a common and expensive complication of abdominal surgery. At C.H.U. Gabriel Tour&#233; they represent 2.93% of surgical emergencies and 61.75% of acute intestinal occlusions.</p><p>Bridles and adhesions are structures found in 95% of patients with previous abdominal procedures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87346-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87346-ref2">2</xref>] . They are directly related to surgical trauma even if it is minimal. JOHANET [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87346-ref3">3</xref>] shows that after laparotomy, one patient in a hundred will present an occlusion by flange and adhesion in the year following the intervention and that in the very long term 3 patients out of a hundred will have to suffer from this pathology.</p><p>Miller G [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87346-ref4">4</xref>] shows that in 1992 there were 12,000 to 14,400 cases of hail obstruction in the United Kingdom by flanges and/or adhesions per year, which corresponds to an incidence of 200 cases/100,000 inhabitants.</p><p>Occlusions of the small bowel with flanges and adhesions represent a common and expensive complication of abdominal surgery.</p><p>In Europe they are the leading cause of small bowel obstruction (70%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87346-ref1">1</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87346-ref6">6</xref>] with a non-negligible mortality of 4% to 17% depending on the series [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87346-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87346-ref6">6</xref>] . In Africa they have been the object of several studies. In Niger, Harouna et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87346-ref7">7</xref>] estimated that they represent 39.3% of bowel obstruction and affect a population that is often very young.</p><p>Increasingly his laparoscopic treatment has been the subject of several studies.</p><p>The objectives were to determine the hospital frequency of postoperative small bowel obstruction in the general surgery department, to describe the therapeutic epidemiological aspects of the treatment and to analyze the operative follow-up.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>We conducted a retrospective study that covered 8 years (January 2009-December 2017). It was performed in the General Surgery Department at Kati HCSS.</p><p>Inclusion criteria: All patients operated for small bowel obstruction by adhesions and/or flanges, the diagnosis of which has been confirmed.</p><p>Exclusion criteria: We excluded other types of occlusion and non-operated patients.</p><p>The variables studied were: age, sex, clinical signs, radiological signs, operative techniques. The source of the data was the patient’s records, the operating record register, the hospitalization record. EPI-INFO software 7 was used to analyze the data. The validity test of the results is the Chi-square with probability threshold P &lt; 0.005.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Result</title><p>We recorded a total of 162 cases of hail obstruction by adhesions and/or flanges, i.e. 2.87% of surgical emergencies and 60.95% of acute intestinal occlusions. The average age was 32.04 years + or − 11.50 with extremes of 15 and 75 years (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>), the sex ratio was 1.2 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). The average consultation time was 4 days (with extremes of 1 and 15 days). All our patients had a surgical history. Abdominal pain associated with stopping of material and gas was present in all our patients. Vomiting was found in 155 patients (95.6%), 9 patients (5.5%) showed signs of dehydration. The physical signs found on examination are grouped in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. X-ray of the abdomen without preparation carried out in all the patients made it possible to objectify in 150 patients (92.6%) of the hydro-hail levels. All the patients were operated on. In operative room occlusion of small bowel was present in 80 patients (49.4%) of whom 11 had intestinal necrosis (6.8%). Occlusion of small bowel and adhesion was present in 69 patients without necrosis. Adhesion obstruction of hail accounted for 6.8% (11 cases). The operative techniques were: flange resection in 91 patients (56.2%), flange resection and adhesiolysis in 40 patients (24.7%), adhesiolysis in 20 patients (12.3%), resection of the flange and anastomosis resection in 9 patients (5.5%), resection of the flange and ileostomy in 2 patients (1.2%). The follow-up was simple in 151 patients (93.2%). <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> groups the complications according to the different operating techniques. We recorded 5 cases of parietal suppuration (3.1%), 1 case of digestive fistula (0.6%), and 2 cases of postoperative evisceration (1.2%). Mortality was 1.2% of cases, i.e. 2 deaths. The average duration of hospitalization was 6 days.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Postoperative occlusion is a surgical entity characterized by the formation of a fibrous membrane especially on the small bowel. We recorded a frequency of 1.6% comparable statistically to that of Moroccan series [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87346-ref8">8</xref>] .</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Physical Signs</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Signs</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Numbers</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Inspection</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Abdominal scar</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >162</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Abdominal distention</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.4%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Palpation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Abdominal defense</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.3%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Abdominal meteorism</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.3%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >contracture</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.4%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Percussion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Abdominal tympanism</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.3%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mateness of flanks</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.6%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Auscultation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Increased hydro-aerial noise</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.2%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Auscultatory silence</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.2%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Operative gestures and postoperative morbidity</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Operative procedures</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Post operative</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Suite simples</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Surgical site infection</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Digestive fistula</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Post operative evisceration</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Section of the flange</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Flange resection and adhesiolysis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >adhesiolysis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Flange resection and anastomosis resection</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Resection of the flange and ileostomy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >152</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Significant difference between operative technique performed and postoperative morbidity with P &lt; 0.05.</p><p>We recorded a younger population with an average age of 34 years compared with Western series [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87346-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87346-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87346-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87346-ref12">12</xref>] (P = 0.05). This difference could be explained by the younger population in Africa compared to a more aging Western population.</p><p>Abdominal pain and vomiting are very common symptoms of small bowel obstruction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87346-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87346-ref14">14</xref>] . We had a proportion ranging from 97.1% to 100% of vomiting, stopping of material and gas and abdominal pain.</p><p>X-ray of the abdomen without preparation is the first-line examination to be made when there is suspicion of small bowel obstruction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87346-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87346-ref15">15</xref>] . All our patients achieved ASP (100%) this does not differ from the Harouna study in Niger (91.9%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87346-ref13">13</xref>] P = 0.55. The benefits of this radiological examination are the lower cost and easy achievement in regional hospitals in Mali. For centers that are equipped, abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) with or without injection of contrast medium is becoming increasingly important. It allows at the same time to pose the diagnosis with certainty but especially the diagnosis of gravity. The operative technique performed depends on the state of the loop, the condition of the patient, the risk factors, whatever the cause of the occlusion flanges and/or adhesions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87346-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87346-ref17">17</xref>] .</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> summarizes the various operative techniques according to the authors.</p><p>In the literature the mortality varies according to the authors 3.4% and 7.7% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87346-ref18">18</xref>] .</p><p>The mortality in our study (1.2%) does not differ from that of the Norwegian series.</p><p>The delay in consultation, the age of the patient and his general condition could increase this mortality.</p><p>Infection of the operative site is the most common early postoperative complication in digestive surgery [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87346-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87346-ref19">19</xref>] . The same finding was made in our study (3.1%).</p><p>Digestive fistula is a serious complication of digestive surgery. According to the authors, this fistula varies from 2.3% to 5.7% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87346-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87346-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87346-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87346-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87346-ref20">20</xref>] .</p><p>All the fistulas of our series have dried up during the duration of the hospitalization and only the medical treatment (local, nutritional care) was used.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Technique according to authors</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Authors</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Flange section n (%) P</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Clamp and adhesiolysis section n (%) P</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Adhesiolysis n (%) P</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Resection anastomosis n (%) P</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ileostomy n (%) P</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Beyrout Tunisie 2006 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87346-ref19">19</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >152 (59) 0.2148</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54 (21.1) 0.0125</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 (11.6) 0.0253</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (6.5) 0.3258</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kouadio RCI2004 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87346-ref13">13</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 (51) 0.6233</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (4.1) 0.0008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (10.2) 0.8046</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17 (34.7) 0.0001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Duron France 2006 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.87346-ref21">21</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130 (45) 0.5438</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 (8) 0.0022</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56 (19.6) 0.0090</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 (11) 0.0259</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (1.4) 0.5484</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Our study Mali 2017</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91 (56.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 (24.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 (12.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (5.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (1.2%)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>The occlusion of the hail by bridle and/or adhesion is a surgical emergency that in Africa affects a population often very young, whose prognosis depends on the early management.</p><p>Delayed consultation and certain comorbidities (diabetes, high blood pressure) may be life-threatening for patients.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Diarra, A., Keita, K., Traor&#233;, A., Kon&#233;, A., Traore, I., Tounkara, I., Kante, A., Tall, F.K., Diallo, D., Magan&#233;, M.I., Konate, M., Kon&#233;, A., Sanogo, D.S., Konare, I. and Traor&#233;, A. (2018) Postoperative Occlusion of the Small Bowel with Flanges and/or Adhesions in General Surgery of Kati BSS CHU. Surgical Science, 9, 293-299. https://doi.org/10.4236/ss.2018.99035</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.87346-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dargent</surname><given-names> J.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Caillot</surname><given-names> J.L. and Chalbet J Y. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1987</year>)<article-title>Occlusions post-opératoires tardives du grêle par brides. Etude rétrospective de 47 dossiers, facteur de pronostic</article-title><source> Lyon Chirurgical</source><volume> 83</volume>,<fpage> 404</fpage>-<lpage>406</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87346-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ivarsson, M.L., Holmdahl, L. and Franzen, G. (1997) Cost of Bowel Obstruction Resulting from Adhesions. The European Journal of Surgery, 163, 679-684.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87346-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Johanet, H., Traxer, O. and Manceau, C. (1999) Occlusion aigu&amp;euml;s du grêle par bride et adhérences. Annales de Chirurgie, 53, 859-886.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87346-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Miller, G., Boman, J. and Shier, I. (2000) Natural History of Patients with Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction. British Journal of Surgery, 87, 1240-1247. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01530.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87346-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">La Gamma, A., Letoquart, J.P. and Kunin, N. (1994) Les occlusions du grêle par brides et adhérences. Analyse sur 157 Cas opérés. Journal de Chirurgie, 131, 279-284.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87346-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Montz, F.J., Holschneider, C.H., Solh, S., Schuricht, L.C. and Monk, B.J. (1994) Small Bowel Obstruction Following Radical Hysterectomy: Risk, Incidence and Operative Findings. Gynaecologic Oncology, 53, 114-120.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87346-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Harouna, Y., Maazou, I. and Almoustapha, I. (2005) Les occlusions intestinales aigu&amp;euml;s par brides: A propos de 87 cas. Médecine d’Afrique Noire, 935, 317-319.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87346-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Makhouad, R. (2018) Etude rétrospective des occlusions intestinales: Diagnostic et prise en charge (service de chirurgie viscérale; Hit Marrakech). Thèse de Médecine, Université Cadi Ayyad, Marrakech.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87346-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K&amp;ouml;ssi, J., Salminen, P. and Laato, M. (2004) The Epidemiology and Treatment Patterns of Postoperative Adhesion Induced Intestinal Obstruction in Varsinais-Suomi Hospital District. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery, 93, 68-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/145749690409300115</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87346-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Catel, L., Lefèvre, F., Laurent, V., Canard, L., Bresier, L., Guillemin, F.D., et al. (2003) Occlusion sur bride. Quels critères scanographiques de gravité rechercher? Journal of Radiology, 84, 27-31.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87346-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hiki, N., Takeshita, Y., Kubota, K., Tsugi, E., Yamaguchi, H., Shimizu, N., et al. (2004) A Seasonal Variation in the Onset of Postoperative Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction Is Related to Changes in the Climate. Digestive and Liver Disease, 36, 125-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2003.10.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87346-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Naeem, G., Kemp, K.M., Bannon, M.P., et al. (2015) Early Postoperative Small Bowel Obstruction: Open vs Laparoscopic. American Journal of Surgery, 209, 385-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.07.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87346-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kouadio, G.K. and Turquin, T.H. (2004) Prise en charge des occlusions post-opératoires du grêle par brides et adhérences au CHU de Treichville à Abidjan. Médecine d’Afrique Noire, 51, 629-632.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87346-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tseng, C.J., Sun, D.P., Lee, I.C., Weng, S.F. and Chou, C.L. (2016) Factors Associted with Smoll Bowel Obstruction Following Appendectomy: A Population-Based Study. Medecime, 95, e3541.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87346-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dembélé, B.T., Traoré, A. and Diakité, I. (2011) Occlusion du grêle sur bride et adhérence en chirurgie générale CHU Gabriel Touré. Mali Médical, 26, 12-15.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87346-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stephen, W., et al. (2014) A Comparative Analysis between Laparoscopic and Open Adhesiolysis at a Tertiary Care Center. The American Surgeon, 80, 261-269.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87346-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bjorg, T.F., Fevang, J. and Stangeland, L. (2000) Complications and Death after Surgical Treatment of Small Bowel Obstruction: A 35-Year Institutional Experience. Annals of Surgery, 231, 529-537.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87346-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Habib, E. and El Hadad, A. (2003) Occlusion de l’intestin grêle sur bride congénitale chez 16 adultes. Service de chirurgie viscérale et thoracique, h&amp;ocirc;pital Robert-Robert. Annales de Chirurgie, 128, 94-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3944(02)00037-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87346-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Beyrout, I., Gargouri, F. and Gharbi, A. (2006) Late Post-Operative Adhesive Small-Bowel Occlusions. About 258 Cases. La Tunisie Médicale, 84, 9-15.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87346-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dia, A., Fall, B. and Thognon, Ph. (1991) Les occlusions intestinales par brides post-opératoires 79 observations. Journal de Chirurgie, 128, 548-551.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.87346-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Duron, J.J., Silva, N.J., Du Montcel, S.T. and Berger, A. (2006) Adhesive Postoperative Small Bowel Obstruction: Incidence and Risk Factors of Recurrence after Surgical Treatment: A Multicenter Prospective Study. Annals of Surgery, 244, 750-757. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000225097.60142.68</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>