The determination of biochemical methane potential (BMP) is very important for the valorization of food wastes. This study is focused on the evaluation of the theoretical methane production from chemical oxygen demand (COD) of some food wastes, coming out Akouedo landfill. Almost all of the considered samples exhibited methane theoretical yields equal to about 402.5 - 507.8 mLCH4/gVS. These results indicate the suitability of all the studied food wastes from Akouedo landfill to be converted into energy.
The food wastes include uneaten food and food preparation leftovers from residences, commercial establishments such as restaurants, institutional sources like school cafeterias, and industrial sources like factory lunchrooms [1] . The food waste is, for the most part, disposed of in landfill [2] . In light of rapidly rising costs associated with energy supply and waste disposal and increasing public concerns with environmental quality degradation, conversion of food wastes to energy is becoming a more economically viable practice [3] .
Methane potential also called biochemical methane potential (BMP) is a parameter used in evaluating biogas and methane potential of organic materials [4] . The BMP is often defined as the maximum volume of CH4 produced per g of VS substrate [4] . Several theoretical approaches are available to estimate BMP. Food waste has often of a complex composition, which is difficult to describe in detail [5] .The most common parameters used to describe the concentration of food waste are the chemical oxygen demand (COD) and the volatile solids content (VS) [6] . Theoretical BMP can be estimated from chemical oxygen demand (COD) of a given biomass [7] .
In Côte d’Ivoire, the amount of food waste generated was estimated to be 1.624 million tons per year [8] . The food waste is, for the most part, disposed in Akouedo landfill. This landfill is the unique landfill in Abidjan, the economic capital of Côte d’Ivoire. Currently, Côte d’Ivoire experiences energy problem due to dependency on the fossil fuel energy sources. Switching to rely on renewable energy sources will definitely solve the problem in the sustainable way. Food waste is potentially converted to biogas through the fermentation process. Biogas produced from the anaerobic digestion of food waste can also be used to generate energy [9] . The objective of this study is to evaluate the biochemical methane potential (BMP) of food waste collected from Akouedo landfill in Abidjan by a theoretical approach using chemical oxygen demand (COD). This work represents the first determination of biochemical methane potential of food waste from Akouedo landfill in Côte d’Ivoire.
2. Materials and Methods2.1. Food Wastes
Food waste obtained from Akouedo landfill was composed of vegetables and fruits as well as leftover cooked food, which makes most of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste. The wastes of fish tuna and kplala (Corchorus olitorius L) used in this study were also collected from Akouedo landfill in Abidjan. Fifteen samples for each group were collected between December 2017 and February 2018. The substrates were individually homogenized and subsequently stored at −4˚C for further use.
2.2. Analytical Methods
Total solid (TS), volatile solids content (VS), pH, Total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), Total organic carbon (TOC) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) analysis were determined in accordance with American Public Health Association (APHA) standard methods [10] . Samples for metals analysis were prepared by acid digestion and analyzed for metals using an air-acetylene flame atomic adsorption spectrometer (Varian SpectrAA 20).
The maximum methane potential was calculated from the COD concentration using Equation (1), assuming that this equation is valid for any substance or product [7] . This equation gives the theoretical value of methane at laboratory conditions:
BMP = n CH 4 RT pVS added (1)
where BMP is the theoretical production at laboratory conditions, R is the gas constant (R = 0.082 atm L/mol K). T is the temperature of the glass bottle (310 K), p is the atmospheric pressure (1 atm), VSadded (g) are the volatile solids of the substrate and n CH 4 is the amount of molecular methane (mol) determined from Equation (2) [7] .
n CH 4 = COD 64 ( g / mol ) (2)
3. Results and Discussion
The initial characteristics of food wastes strongly affect the methane yield [11] . Food wastes used in this study were individually analyzed for their initial physicochemical characteristics and the results are presented in Table 1. The initial pH of food waste and kplala was lower than the optimum pH required for the methane yield. The pH of the food waste has a significant effect on biogas production, because it affects the activity of bacteria to destroy organic matter into methane [12] . A low pH inhibits the activity of microorganisms involved in the digestion process particularly methanogenic bacteria [12] . C/N ratios of individual wastes used in this study were either greater or lesser than that of reported optimum range of C/N ratio for the methane yield. C/N ratio of tuna waste was relatively lower as compared to food waste, which is due to high nitrogen content of tuna waste mainly in organic form like protein [13] . The C/N ratio of substrate in range of 20 - 30 is considered optimum for the methane yield [14] .
The heavy metals like iron, nickel and zinc, are also essential for the methanogenic bacteria [15] . The Ni, Zn, and Fe values (mg/L) detected in substrates were in the range of 1.16 - 1.94, 0.01 - 0.54, and 0.94 - 1.15, respectively (Table 2). The toxic threshold concentrations of Ni, Zn, and Fe were 10 mg/L, 1 mg/L and 10 mg/L respectively [16] . These concentrations were below the threshold concentrations for each metal. Above threshold, the metal concentration inhibits biogas production and enhances biogas production below threshold [16] .
The calculated methane potential values from the COD of substrates are
Food wastes characteristics
TS (%)
VS (%)
pH
TOC (%)
TKN
C/N
Food waste
24.82 ± 0.03
96.83 ± 0.09
3.94 ± 0.13
55.63 ± 0.01
1.51 ± 0.04
36.76
Kplala
4.44 ± 0.06
86.67 ± 0.03
4.61 ± 0.03
49.81 ± 0.02
2.80 ± 0.04
17.79
Waste of tuna
16.62 ± 0.09
90.72 ± 0.07
7.31 ± 0.09
52.13 ± 0.01
11.83 ± 0.30
4.41
Heavy metal content of food wastes
Fe (mg/L)
Ni (mg/L)
Zn (mg/L)
Food waste
0.93 ± 0.02
1.17 ± 0.04
0.24 ± 0.02
Kplala
1.16 ± 0.02
1.94 ± 0.03
0.54 ± 0.03
Waste of tuna
1.12 ± 0.03
1.57 ± 0.07
0.01 ± 0.01
COD and BMP of food wastes
COD g/kg
BMP mLCH4/gVS
Food waste
302.7 ± 0.02
507.8
Kplala
40.63 ± 0.03
402.5
Waste of tuna
175.47 ± 0.04
445.70
summarized in Table 3. The BMP was ranged from 402.5 to 507.8 mLCH4/gVS. Similar results of methane potential have been determined in other studies for organic wastes (400 - 510 mLCH4/gVS) [17] [18] . These values indicated that these wastes have a good energetic capacity. It is also observed that the theoretical productivity of methane increases with the rise of the COD. The calculated methane potential from COD is a useful tool for determining the best substrate. It is a methodology destined to save costs and time by using the theoretical final methane potential of a substrate from it COD concentration [4] . The BMP for all substrates were the descending order food waste > waste of tuna > kplala. In fact, COD is used to quantify the amount of organic matter in feedstocks and predicts the potential for biogas production. Biogas production in relation to COD is about 0.5 L g−1 COD removed, corresponding to a methane production of approximately 0.35 L CH4 per g of COD removed [4] .
4. Conclusion
In this study, different food wastes from Akouedo landfill were characterized and their theoretical methane yields were calculated from the chemical oxygen demand (COD). The results indicated that food waste was identified as the best substrates among the ones considered, with a methane potential of 507.8 mLCH4/gVS. However, for the others wastes, initial characteristics and BMP show that they constitute also a good substrate for the methanogenic activity of bacteria. Finally, these results indicate the suitability of all the studied food wastes from Akouedo landfill to be utilised in anaerobic conditions for biogas production.
Cite this paper
Cyril, K.M., Rodrigue, K.A., Essi, K., Albert, T. and Agboue, A. (2018) Biochemical Methane Potential of Food Wastes from Akouedo Landfill, Côte d’Ivoire. Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 8, 288-293. https://doi.org/10.4236/gsc.2018.83019
ReferencesBodík, I., Sedlácek, S., Kubaská, M., & Hutnan, M. (2010) Perspectives of Biogas Production from Restaurant Waste on Slovak Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants. 37th International Conference of SSCHE, Tatranske Matliare, Slovakia, 24-28 May 2010, 1119-1125.Salemdeeb, R., zu Ermgassen, E.K., Kim, M.H., Balmford, A. and Al-Tabbaa, A. (2017) Environmental and Health Impacts of Using Food Waste as Animal Feed: A Comparative Analysis of Food Waste Management Options. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 871-880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.049Zhang, R., El-Mashad, H.M., Hartman, K., Wang, F., Liu, G., Choate, C. and Gamble, P. (2007) Characterization of Food Waste as Feedstock for Anaerobic Digestion. Bioresource Technology, 98, 929-935.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.02.039Jingura, R.M. and Kamusoko, R. (2017) Methods for Determination of Biomethane Potential of Feedstocks: A Review. Biofuel Research Journal, 4, 573-586.
https://doi.org/10.18331/BRJ2017.4.2.3Schanes, K., Dobernig, K. and Gozet, B. (2018) Food Waste Matters—A Systematic Review of Household Food Waste Practices and Their Policy Implications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 978-991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.030Zamanzadeh, M., Hagen, L.H., Svensson, K., Linjordet, R. and Horn, S.J. (2017) Biogas Production from Food Waste via Co-Digestion and Digestion-Effects on Performance and Microbial Ecology. Scientific Reports, 7, 17664.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15784-wNielfa, A., Cano, R. and Fdz-Polanco, M. (2015) Theoretical Methane Production Generated by the Co-Digestion of Organic Fraction Municipal Solid Waste and Biological Sludge. Biotechnology Reports, 5, 14-21.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2014.10.005Soro, N., Ouattara, L., Dongo, K., Kouadio, E.K., Ahoussi, E.K., Soro, G., Biemi, J., et al. (2010) Déchets municipaux dans le District d’Abidjan en Cote d’Ivoire: Sources potentielles de pollution des eaux souterraines. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 4, No. 6.Pisutpaisal, N., Boonyawanich, S. and Saowaluck, H. (2014) Feasibility of Biomethane Production from Banana Peel. Energy Procedia, 50, 782-788.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.06.096Federation, W.E., American Public Health Association (2005) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. American Public Health Association (APHA), Washington DC.Zamanzadeh, M., Hagen, L.H., Svensson, K., Linjordet, R. and Horn, S.J. (2017) Biogas Production from Food Waste via Co-Digestion and Digestion-Effects on Performance and Microbial Ecology. Scientific Reports, 7, 17664.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15784-wAli Shah, F., Mahmood, Q., Maroof Shah, M., Pervez, A. and Ahmad Asad, S. (2014) Microbial Ecology of Anaerobic Digesters: The Key Players of Anaerobiosis. The Scientific World Journal, 2014, Article ID: 183752.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/183752Lin, J., Zuo, J., Gan, L., Li, P., Liu, F., Wang, K., Gan, H., et al. (2011) Effects of Mixture Ratio on Anaerobic Co-Digestion with Fruit and Vegetable Waste and Food Waste of China. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 23, 1403-1408.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(10)60572-4Wang, X., Lu, X., Li, F. and Yang, G. (2014) Effects of Temperature and Carbon-Nitrogen (C/N) Ratio on the Performance of Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Dairy Manure, Chicken Manure and Rice Straw: Focusing on Ammonia Inhibition. PloS One, 9, e97265. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097265Mudhoo, A. and Kumar, S. (2013) Effects of Heavy Metals as Stress Factors on Anaerobic Digestion Processes and Biogas Production from Biomass. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 10, 1383-1398.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-012-0167-yBozym, M., Florczak, I., Zdanowska, P., Wojdalski, J. and Klimkiewicz, M. (2015) An Analysis of Metal Concentrations in Food Wastes for Biogas Production. Renewable Energy, 77, 467-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.11.010Dinuccio, E., Balsari, P., Gioelli, F. and Menardo, S. (2010) Evaluation of the Biogas Productivity Potential of Some Italian Agro-Industrial Biomasses. Bioresource Technology, 101, 3780-3783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.12.113Labatut, R.A., Angenent, L.T. and Scott, N.R. (2011) Biochemical Methane Potential and Biodegradability of Complex Organic Substrates. Bioresource Technology, 102, 2255-2264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.035