<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2018.99135</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-86756</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Impact of Essential Micronutrient, Zn, on Growth and Chlorophyll Biosynthesis in Young &lt;i&gt;Zea mays&lt;/i&gt; Seedlings
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>R.</surname><given-names>(Chinchalkar) Waghmare</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>R.</surname><given-names>Gadre</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>School of Biochemistry, Devi Ahilya University, Takshashila Campus, Indore, India</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>rekhagadre29@gmail.com(RG)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>07</day><month>08</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>09</issue><fpage>1855</fpage><lpage>1867</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>6,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2018</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>18,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2018</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>21,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2018</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The present study analyses growth and chlorophyll biosynthesis in young maize seedlings in response to Zn supply over a wide range of concentrations. Supply of 0 
  - 
  5 mM ZnCl<sub>2</sub> to 3 days old light grown maize seedlings led to gradually increased accumulation of Zn in the shoot tissue, while in the root tissue substantial increase was observed at/and above 0.1 mM ZnCl<sub>2</sub>. Zn supply significantly reduced the overall growth of maize seedlings mostly at 1
   
  -
   
  5 mM ZnCl<sub>2</sub> exerting strong correlation and the observed effect was more substantial for root tissue. Amongst the biochemical parameters, increase in protein and proline content was more prominent in root tissue than the shoot, while RNA content was reduced in shoot tissue. Zn treatment to light grown seedlings significantly increased the chlorophyll, carotenoid content, while in dark grown seedlings it had marginal/no effect. Delta amino levulinic acid (ALA) content in both the regimes was increased at higher Zn concentrations. Also ALA synthesis was increased in both the regimes, but non significantly. Zn enhanced ALA dehydratase (ALAD) activity of light as well as dark grown seedlings being significant in former. The results demonstrate that the Zn accumulation and growth effect at higher Zn concentrations in maize depend
   
  upon the tissue with root as the target site and shoot growth 
  are
   mainly influenced by ALA and subsequently ALAD in maize seedlings.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Amino Levulinic Acid</kwd><kwd> Amino Levulinic Acid Dehydratase</kwd><kwd> Chlorophyll Biosynthesis</kwd><kwd> Growth Effects</kwd><kwd> Maize</kwd><kwd> Zn Effects</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Zinc (Zn) being an essential micronutrient for plants, is required for optimum growth and development. Its deficiency as well as toxic symptoms has been found in different plants. Zn deficiency reduces various physiological processes, such as, net photosynthesis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref1">1</xref>] , tissue water content and P and Mg concentrations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref2">2</xref>] in plants. Toxic effects of Zn in plants influencing different functions have also been reported, such as, high concentrations of Zn decrease net photosynthesis and respiration rate in Beta vulgaris [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref3">3</xref>] , generate reactive oxygen species, and decrease the chlorophyll content and shoot yield [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref4">4</xref>] . Zn effects on plant growth varies in different species, thus decrease has been observed in ryegrass [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref5">5</xref>] , clusterbean [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref6">6</xref>] , in sugarbeet [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref7">7</xref>] , and in Sorghum [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref8">8</xref>] while in Eruca sativa seedlings increase is reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>Chlorophylls are the vital pigments being analyzed to assess the impact of deficiency as well as the toxicity of various causative factors. Chlorophylls are one of the essential tetrapyrroles responsible for their light trapping and energy transduction activities. Chlorophyll biosynthesis is a vital physiological process of the green plants, which is regulated at several steps [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref10">10</xref>] . Its biosynthesis involves a complex pathway having a large number of intermediates with amino levulinic acid (ALA) as the common precursor for all tetrapyrroles. ALA is synthesized by the two pathways, the Shemin pathway involving glycine and succinyl Co-A and the Beale pathway, involving the C-5 compounds, like glutamate and 2-oxoglutarate by an ALA synthesizing system in plants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref10">10</xref>] . ALA dehydratase (ALAD, E.C. 4.2.1.24) catalyses the next step i.e. conversion of ALA to porphobilinogen, the basic unit of tetrapyrrole. ALADs from different sources are metalloenzymes that utilize a variety of divalent and monovalent cations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref11">11</xref>] . Plant ALAD requires Mg<sup>2+</sup> and Zn<sup>2+</sup> for its activity. Decrease in chlorophyll content due to Zn supply has been reported in several plant species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref7">7</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref8">8</xref>] and also the photosynthetic activity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref5">5</xref>] . However, Zn effects on enzymes of chlorophyll biosynthesis including earlier steps are rare. Early stages of seedling growth are a crucial part of any plant life. Thus, to study impact of Zn three days old seedlings were used involving hydroponic technique with the objective to evaluate the Zn effects in relation to growth and chlorophyll biosynthesis in young maize seedlings.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methodology</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Plant Material and Treatment</title><p>Seeds of Zea mays L. cv. Ganga safed-2, were surface sterilized with HgCl<sub>2</sub> (0.1%) for 1 - 2 min followed by thorough washing and then soaked in distilled water for half an hour. About 20 seeds were placed in petri plates lined with moistened whatman filter paper and the seedlings were grown for three days in continuous light of 30 Wm<sup>−2</sup> at 26˚C &#177; 2˚C. For some experiments, the seedlings were raised in continuous dark for three days and then used for treatment, which reflected the analysis of light induced chlorophyll biosynthesis. For Zn treatment, 4 uniformly grown seedlings were transferred to 40 ml of 0 - 5 mM ZnCl<sub>2</sub> solution contained in small petri plates for 24 h in continuous light as above and the treated seedlings were used for various analyses.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Analytical Procedures</title><p>Determination of growth and Zn content―Treated seedlings were used to analyze Zn content, fresh weight, dry weight, number of roots, weight and length of root and shoot. For Zn content analysis, root and shoot tissue of the seedlings were dried in oven at 80˚C for 72 hours. The dried material (400 mg) was wet digested with 5 ml of conc. HNO<sub>3</sub> and diluted 5&#215; to 50&#215; times i.e. (5&#215; (control), 10&#215; (0.001, 0.01, 0.1 mM), 20&#215; (1 and 2 mM) and 50&#215; (5 mM) with distil water. Zn content was determined by using atomic absorption spectrophotometer, make “GBC, Scientific Equipment Ltd―AVANTA”.</p><p>Biochemical parameters―Total protein and RNA content of root and shoot tissue were measured by the method of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref12">12</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref13">13</xref>] , respectively. For protein content analysis, treated tissues were first boiled with and then extracted using 5.0 ml of 80% ethanol for each step. The extract was centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 10 min and the pellet was suspended in 5.0 ml of 10% TCA for 30 min and again centrifuged similarly. The resulting pellet was dissolved in 5.0 ml of 0.1 N NaOH and kept for at least 1hr. After centrifugation, the supernatant was used for protein estimation with Folin Ciocaulteau’s phenol reagent. For RNA extraction similar 80% ethanol treatment was used and then the pellet was suspended in 2.0 ml of 1% PCA mixed thoroughly and centrifuged. The pellet was treated with 5.0 ml of ethanol: diethyl ether: chloroform (2:2:1 v/v) mixture and then centrifuged. Three ml of 0.3 N KOH was added to the residue and was incubated at 37˚C for 18 hr. Next the pH was adjusted to 2.0 using 1 N PCA, centrifuged and appropriately diluted supernatent was used to estimate total RNA by orcinol reagent. For proline content determination, method of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref14">14</xref>] was used.</p><p>Chlorophyll extraction and estimation―Pigments were extracted from the treated shoot tissue using 80% acetone and estimated spectrophotometrically by measuring the absorbance at 470 nm, 646 nm, and 663 nm. The pigment content was calculated using the following equations according to the method of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref15">15</xref>] .</p><p>Chla ( μgml − 1 ) = 12 . 21 ( A 663 ) − 2 . 81 ( A 646 )</p><p>Chlb ( μgml − 1 ) = 2 0. 13 ( A 646 ) − 5 .0 3 ( A 663 )</p><p>TotalChlorophyll = Chla + Chlb</p><p>Caratenoids ( μgml − 1 ) = 1 000 ( A 47 0 ) − 3 . 27 ( Chla ) − 1 0 4 ( Chlb ) / 229 .</p><p>ALA content determination―Estimation was performed according to the method of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref16">16</xref>] . For extraction of ALA, shoot tissue was extracted with 1 M sodium acetate buffer. Homogenate was further centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min at 4˚C. ALA was reacted with ethyl acetoacetate followed by modified Ehlrich reagent for estimation. Color formation was measured at absorbance 555 nm on Shimadzu UV-1800 spectrophotometer.</p><p>ALA Formation―method of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref16">16</xref>] was used to estimate the activity. Light and dark grown seedlings were used which were further incubated with levulinic acid which is responsible for inhibition of ALA synthesis. Incubation was performed in light and dark conditions. Modified Ehlrich reagent was used to estimate amount of ALA as above.</p><p>ALAD assay―ALAD activity was assayed spectrophometrically by estimating the amount of PBG (porphobilinogen) formed using modified Ehlrich reagent [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref17">17</xref>] according to the method of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref18">18</xref>] . Treated shoot was extracted in 50 mM Tris HCl buffer (pH 8.2) containing 10 mM DTT. Extract was centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 30 min at 4˚C and supernatant was used as enzyme preparation. Reaction mixture of ALA, enzyme and MgCl<sub>2</sub> was used to which TCA was added to stop the reaction. One unit of enzyme activity is defined as 1 nmol of PBG formed per hour.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Data Analysis</title><p>Data presented in the paper are average of at least four independent experiments with &#177; S.E. Significance of difference obtained for various treatments was tested by the Student’s t-test. Compound correlation was calculated by Graphpad Prism 7.04.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Effect on Zn Accumulation in Root and Shoot of Maize Seedlings</title><p>Supply of 0 - 5 mM ZnCl<sub>2</sub> to three days old maize seedlings for 24 h resulted in concentration dependent increase in accumulation of Zn in root as well as shoot tissue with the effect being more substantial in the former (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Sharp increase in Zn content in root tissue was observed at/above 0.1 mM, while in shoot</p><p>tissue the increase was gradual; hence, perfect correlation resulted for later with R<sup>2</sup> values being 0.591 and 0.976, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Effect of ZnCl<sub>2</sub> on Growth and Biochemical Parameters of Maize Seedlings</title><p>Zinc treatment of maize seedlings reduced significantly the fresh wt of the seedlings at higher concentrations of 1 - 5 mM, while the dry wt was reduced slightly (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Root parameters, like number and length were decreased more prominently and significantly in the concentration range of 0.1 to 5 mM Zn, but effect on shoot length was less severe and less significant (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Further, root wt was decreased more prominently and significantly than shoot weight. Moreover, all the growth parameters were correlated with Zn treatment with R<sup>2</sup> values being in the range of 0.542 (For root length) to 0.744 (For shoot wt).</p><p>Incubation of maize seedlings with ZnCl<sub>2</sub> increased the protein content in both the root as well as shoot tissue with the effect being more prominent and significant in former (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Proline content was also increased in both the tissue with more significant change in roots (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The RNA content in shoot tissue was decreased, while it was increased in root issue but the effect was not significant except at 1 mM Zn (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>Compound correlation analyses yielded correlation between each pair of the parameters. Thus, in root tissue a perfect correlation of Zn content with root wt and protein and also between root wt and protein was observed having the values −0.989, 0.947 and −0.969, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>(a)). For Zn content, root wt and protein with RNA and proline, strong correlation with values being in the range of 0.654 to 0.740 resulted, however between RNA and proline there was no correlation (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>(a)). In shoot tissue perfect correlation was observed for Zn content and shoots wt with proline having the values 0.939 and −0.949, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>(b)). Very strong correlation of shoot wt with Zn content</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of supply of ZnCl<sub>2</sub> on fresh wt, dry wt, root no., root and shoot length, root and shoot wt of the seedlings. Three days old maize seedlings were treated with varying concentrations of ZnCl<sub>2</sub> for 24 h at continuous light intensity of 30 Wm<sup>−2</sup> and temperature 26˚C &#177; 2˚C and various growth parameters were measured</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >ZnCl<sub>2</sub> conc, mM</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fresh wt, mg</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Dry wt, mg</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Root No</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Root length, cm</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Shoot length, cm</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Root wt, mg</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Shoot wt, mg</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >612 &#177; 9 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >271 &#177; 11 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 &#177; 0.2 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7 &#177; 0.3 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.9 &#177; 0.4 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >114 &#177; 10 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >122 &#177; 10 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >612 &#177; 10 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >263 &#177; 10 (97)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 &#177; 0.2 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8 &#177; 0.5 (84)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.9 &#177; 0.4 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >109 &#177; 13 (96)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108 &#177; 6 (89)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >612 &#177; 15 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >259 &#177; 8 (96)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 &#177; 0.4 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.7 &#177; 0.4 (82)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3 &#177; 0.1 (79)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101 &#177; 13 (89)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >106 &#177; 2 (87)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >604 &#177; 19 (99)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >254 &#177; 19 (94)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 &#177; 0.2** (60)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.3 &#177; 0.1** (58)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3 &#177; 0.2 (79)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82 &#177; 9 (72)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95 &#177; 8 (78)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >544 &#177; 21* (89)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >251 &#177; 9 (93)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 &#177; 0.2** (60)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0 &#177; 0.3** (53)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1 &#177; 0.1 (72)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56 &#177; 5** (49)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82 &#177; 6* (67)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >535 &#177; 29 (87)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >247 &#177; 12 (91)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 &#177; 0.1** (60)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.8 &#177; 0.1** (49)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6 &#177; 0.1* (55)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46 &#177; 4** (40)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77 &#177; 7* (63)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >528 &#177; 12** (86)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >241 &#177; 15 (89)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 &#177; 0.2*** (40)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3 &#177; 0.2***(40)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5 &#177; 0.1* (52)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39 &#177; 3** (34)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62 &#177; 8** (51)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>2</sup> value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.681</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.659</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.597</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.542</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.659</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.659</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.744</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Values relative to control are given in parentheses. The level of significance tested was denoted as p values * &lt; 0.05, ** &lt; 0.01, *** &lt; 0.001.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of supply of ZnCl<sub>2</sub> on total protein, RNA and proline content of root and shoot tissue of the seedlings. Three days old maize seedlings were treated with varying concentrations of ZnCl<sub>2</sub> for 24 h at continuous light intensity of 30 Wm<sup>−2</sup> and temperature 26˚C &#177; 2˚C and various biochemical parameters were measured</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >ZnCl<sub>2</sub> ]conc, mM</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Root</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Shoot</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total protein, mg g<sup>−1</sup> fr wt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total RNA, mg g<sup>−1</sup> fr wt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Proline, &#181;g g<sup>−1</sup> fr wt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total protein, mg g<sup>−1</sup> fr wt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total RNA, mg g<sup>−1</sup> fr wt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Proline, &#181;g g<sup>−1</sup> fr wt</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0 &#177; 0.4 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.1 &#177; 1.6 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >259 &#177; 14 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.8 &#177; 0.4 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.3 &#177; 1.3 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >171 &#177; 17 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8 &#177; 0.4 (97)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.0 &#177; 1.9 (88)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >358 &#177; 43 (138)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.9 &#177; 0.5 (102)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.6 &#177; 0.7 (86)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >183 &#177; 24 (107)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.4 &#177; 0.5 (106)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.5 &#177; 2.7 (86)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >399 &#177; 14*** (154)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5 &#177; 0.4 (96)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.9 &#177; 0.8 (81)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >185 &#177; 14 (108)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.6 &#177; 1.1 (143)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.0 &#177; 3.2 (133)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >342 &#177; 40 (132)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5 &#177; 0.1 (96)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.6 &#177; 0.8 (78)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >199 &#177; 22 (116)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.6 &#177; 0.7** (160)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.4 &#177; 0.4* (124)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >381 &#177; 82 (147)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.7 &#177; 1.2 (128)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.3 &#177; 1.8 (76)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >236 &#177; 23 (138)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.9 &#177; 1.5** (215)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.4 &#177; 1.4 (118)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >405 &#177; 41** (156)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.2 &#177; 0.45* (135)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.7 &#177; 1.7 (79)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >237 &#177; 33 (139)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.3 &#177; 1.2***(222)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.3 &#177; 1.1 (118)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >456 &#177; 42** (176)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.4 &#177; 0.60 (124)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.2 &#177; 1.5 (75)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >310 &#177; 37** (181)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Values relative to control are given in parentheses. The level of significance tested was denoted as p values * &lt; 0.05, ** &lt; 0.01, *** &lt; 0.001.</p><table-wrap-group id="3"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> (a) Compound Correlation data of Zn Content, Root wt, Protein, RNA, Proline content in root tissues. (b) Compound Correlation data of Zn Content, Shoot wt, Protein, RNA, Proline content in shoot tissues</title></caption><table-wrap id="3_1"><caption><title> (b)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Zn content</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Root wt</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Protein</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >RNA</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Proline</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn content</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.989</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.947</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.729</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.654</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Root wt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.969</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.695</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.740</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Protein</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.656</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.700</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RNA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.169</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Proline</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="3_2"><caption><title></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Zn content</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Shoot wt</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Protein</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >RNA</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Proline</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn content</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.854</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.632</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.494</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.939</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shoot wt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.787</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.826</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.949</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Protein</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.481</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.727</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RNA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.670</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Proline</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><p>(−0.854) and RNA (0.826), strong correlation of protein with Zn content (0.632), shoot wt (−0.787) and proline (0.727) and between RNA and proline −0.670) also resulted (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>(b)). While for RNA with Zn content and protein lesser correlation was observed.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Effect of ZnCl<sub>2</sub> on Chlorophyll Biosynthesis in Shoot Tissue of Light Grown Maize Seedlings</title><p>Treatment of light grown maize seedlings with ZnCl<sub>2</sub> at 1 - 5 mM increased the chlorophyll, carotenoid and ALA content with significant effect for carotenoids at 5 mM Zn and for ALA at 2 and 5 mM both (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>(a)). To analyse ALA formation activity ZnCl<sub>2</sub> treated seedlings were incubated with 60 mM levulinic acid for 4 h either in light or dark corresponding to chloroplastic and mitochondrial activities respectively, the ALA accumulation in both was slightly enhanced and exerted no correlation (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>(b)), However, ZnCl<sub>2</sub> significantly increased ALAD activity at all the concentrations (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>(b)).</p><p>The compound correlation analysed for chlorophyll and carotenoid contents with Zn content exhibited very strong +ve correlation (0.862) but had shown very strong −ve correlation (−0.836 and −0.807) with shoot wt (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>(a)). For ALA with Zn content the correlation was strong being 0.703 and with shoot wt it was</p><table-wrap-group id="4"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> (a) Effect of supply of ZnCl<sub>2</sub> on total chlorophylls, carotenoids and ALA content in shoot tissue of the light grown seedlings. Three days old maize seedlings were treated with varying concentrations of ZnCl<sub>2</sub> for 24 h at continuous light intensity of 30 Wm<sup>−2</sup> and temperature 26˚C &#177; 2˚C. (b) Effect of ZnCl<sub>2</sub> on ALAS and ALAD activity in shoot tissue of light grown seedlings. Three days old maize seedlings were treated with varying concentrations of ZnCl<sub>2</sub> for 24 h at continuous light intensity of 30 Wm<sup>−2</sup> and temperature 26˚C &#177; 2˚C</title></caption><table-wrap id="4_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >ZnCl<sub>2</sub> conc, mM</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total chlorophylls, &#181;g g<sup>−1</sup> fr wt</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Carotenoids, &#181;g g<sup>−1</sup> fr wt</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ALA content, nmoles g<sup>−1</sup> fr wt</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >207 &#177; 8 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.3 &#177; 2.4 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >234 &#177; 13 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >206 &#177; 13 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.4 &#177; 2.7 (93)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >235 &#177; 11 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >211 &#177; 13 (102)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.3 &#177; 1.8 (104)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >260 &#177; 18 (111)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >196 &#177; 12.2 (95)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.5 &#177; 1.8 (93)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >259 &#177; 18 (111)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >240 &#177; 12 (116)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.0 &#177; 1.7 (126)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >352 &#177; 70 (150)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >229 &#177; 16 (111)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.8 &#177; 3.8 (117)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >312 &#177; 13* (133)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >270 &#177; 19 (131)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.9 &#177; 1.7** (157)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >351 &#177; 16** (150)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="4_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >ZnCl<sub>2</sub> conc, mM</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ALAS activity, nmoles ALA formed h<sup>−1</sup> g<sup>−1</sup> fr wt In Light</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ALAS activity, nmoles ALA formed h<sup>−1</sup> g<sup>−1</sup> fr wt In Dark</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ALAD activity, nmoles PBG formed h<sup>−1</sup> g<sup>−1</sup> fr wt</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88 &#177; 6 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83 &#177; 5 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200 &#177; 7 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88 &#177; 3 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93 &#177; 8 (112)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >249 &#177; 4** (125)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99 &#177; 8 (113)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93 &#177; 7 (112)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >263 &#177; 4** (132)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92 &#177; 5 (105)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91 &#177; 7 (110)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >279 &#177; 5*** (140)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97 &#177; 5 (111)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96 &#177; 2 (116)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >345 &#177; 11*** (173)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><table-wrap-group id="5"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> (a) Compound Correlation data of Zn content, shoot wt, total chlorophyll, carotenoids, ALA content in shoot tissues of light grown maize seedlings; (b) Compound Correlation data of Zn content, shoot wt, ALAS light and dark treated and ALAD in shoot tissues of light grown maize seedlings</title></caption><table-wrap id="5_1"><caption><title> (b)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Zn content</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Shoot wt</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Chlorophyll</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Carotenoid</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ALA</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn content</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.854</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.862</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.862</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.703</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shoot wt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.836</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.807</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.908</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chlorophyll</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.992</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.891</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carotenoid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.870</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ALA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="5_2"><caption><title></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Zn content</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Shoot wt</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ALAS in light</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ALAS in dark</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ALAD</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn content</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.830</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.527</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.590</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.875</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shoot wt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.681</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.776</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.979</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ALAS in light</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.624</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.658</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ALAS in dark</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.852</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ALAD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><p>perfect being −0.908 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>(a)). Further, observed correlation of chlorophyll with carotenoid and ALA was perfect being 0.992 and 0.891, respectively and between carotenoid and ALA was 0.870 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>(a)). Positive correlation for Zn content with ALA formation in light and dark was lesser (0.527 and 0.590), but for ALAD activity was very strong (0.875). Observed correlation of shoot wt with these parameters was negative and stronger being perfect with ALAD (−0.979) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>(b)). Further, ALAD activity exerted strong correlation with ALA formation in light and dark both being 0.658 and 0.852, respectively and stronger with later (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>(b)).</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Effect of ZnCl<sub>2</sub> on Chlorophyll Metabolism in Shoot Tissue of Dark Grown Maize Seedlings</title><p>Treatment of dark grown maize seedlings with ZnCl<sub>2</sub> decreased the chlorophyll content slightly and the carotenoid content remained unaffected, while the ALA content was significantly increased at 2 and 5 mM ZnCl<sub>2</sub> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>(a)). The observed correlation with Zn treatment was found to be very strong for ALA content with R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.818 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>(a)). When maize seedlings were treated with ZnCl<sub>2</sub>, ALA formation activity both in light and dark and ALAD activity were enhanced at 1 and 5 mM showing significant increase for ALA formation in light at 1 mM treatment only (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>(b)). Zn treatment and these parameters also exerted strong correlation with R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.960, 0.728 and 0.691 respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>(b)).</p><table-wrap-group id="6"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> (a) Effect of supply of ZnCl<sub>2</sub> on total chlorophylls, carotenoid and ALA content in shoot tissue of the dark grown seedlings. Three days old maize seedlings were treated with varying concentrations of ZnCl<sub>2</sub> for 24 h at continuous light intensity of 30 Wm<sup>−2</sup> and temperature 26˚C &#177; 2˚C. (b) Effect of ZnCl<sub>2</sub> on ALAS and ALAD activity in shoot tissue of dark grown seedlings. Three days old maize seedlings were treated with varying concentrations of ZnCl<sub>2</sub> for 24 h at continuous light intensity of 30 Wm<sup>−2</sup> and temperature 26˚C &#177; 2˚C</title></caption><table-wrap id="6_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >ZnCl<sub>2</sub> conc., mM</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total chlorophylls, &#181;g g<sup>−1</sup> fr wt.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Carotenoids, &#181;g g<sup>−1</sup> fr wt.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ALA, nmoles g<sup>−1</sup> fr wt</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >115 &#177; 5 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.0 &#177; 1.3 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >333 &#177; 8 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94 &#177; 7 (82)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.9 &#177; 1.0 (99)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >346 &#177; 9 (104)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108 &#177; 9 (94)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.5 &#177; 1.1 (97)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >355 &#177; 13 (107)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101 &#177; 9 (88)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.4 &#177; 1.1 (96)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >375 &#177; 14 (113)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >121 &#177; 7 (105)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.6 &#177; 1.4 (98)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >410 &#177; 15 (123)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >109 &#177; 12 (95)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.0 &#177; 1.9 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >449 &#177; 5** (135)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >106 &#177; 9 (92)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.9 &#177; 0.6 (99)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >475 &#177; 9** (143)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>2</sup> value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.152</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.818</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="6_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >ZnCl<sub>2</sub> conc, mM</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ALAS activity, nmoles ALA formed h<sup>−1</sup> g<sup>−1</sup> fr wt In Light</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ALAS activity,moles ALA formed h<sup>−1</sup> g<sup>−1</sup> fr wt In Dark</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ALAD activity, nmoles PBG formed h<sup>−1</sup> g<sup>−1</sup> fr wt</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64 &#177; 4 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77 &#177; 5 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >140 &#177; 25 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69 &#177; 7 (108)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71 &#177; 5 (92)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >149 &#177; 10 (107)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74 &#177; 7 (116)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68 &#177; 8 (88)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >159 &#177; 10 (114)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80 &#177; 3* (125)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88 &#177; 7 (114)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >168 &#177; 6 (121)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108 &#177; 19 (169)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96 &#177; 10 (125)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >180 &#177; 3 (129)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>2</sup> value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.960</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.728</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.691</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Growth Effects</title><p>Zn is an essential micronutrient for plants, but is toxic at high concentrations, hence its effect on growth depends upon the concentration. Thus decrease in growth due to Zn supply has been reported in ryegrass [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref5">5</xref>] , sugar beet [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref7">7</xref>] cluster bean [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref6">6</xref>] and Sorgham [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref8">8</xref>] , however, in mungbean [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref19">19</xref>] and Eruca sativa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref9">9</xref>] increased growth resulted. In the present study, with the supply of ZnCl<sub>2</sub> to 3 days old maize seedlings, the effect on Zn accumulation and morphological and biochemical growth parameters have been analysed. The Zn treatment led to gradually increased accumulation of Zn in the shoot tissue, while in the root tissue substantial increase was observed at/and above 0.1 mM ZnCl<sub>2</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Also the root parameters were significantly reduced at/and above 0.1 mM ZnCl<sub>2</sub> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Thus Zn supply significantly reduced the overall growth of maize seedlings mostly at 1 - 5 mM ZnCl<sub>2</sub> exerting strong correlation and the observed effect was more substantial for root tissue. Amongst biochemical parameters, increase in protein and proline content was more prominent in root tissue than the shoot, while RNA content was reduced in shoot tissue (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Reduction in RNA may be due to faster degradation and the increased protein due to translation of pre synthesized RNA. It seems that enhanced protein and proline synthesis is associated with Zn effects in root, as these contents are significantly increased. Increased levels of protein may be required for the synthesis of stress induced proteins [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref20">20</xref>] and of proline, for osmotic adjustments in response to Zn. Accumulation of proline is well documented against various stresses in plants, such as, Spinacia oleracea [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref21">21</xref>] and Cucurbeta pepo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref22">22</xref>] . Further, the observed correlation for Zn accumulation in root with as well as between root wt and protein was perfect (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>(a)). Also perfect correlation for Zn accumulation in shoot and shoot wt with proline resulted (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>(b)). Thus the Zn accumulation and growth effect in maize depends upon the tissue with root as the target site.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Chlorophyll Biosynthesis Effects</title><p>Chlorophylls, the vital photosynthetic pigments and carotenoids, the light harvesting pigments in green tissues affect the overall photosynthetic activity and hence the growth and development of the plant. Chlorosis due to both Zn deficiency [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref23">23</xref>] and toxicity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref2">2</xref>] have been observed in plants. Reports of decrease in chlorophyll content due to Zn supply in sugar beet [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref7">7</xref>] , cluster bean [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref6">6</xref>] and Sorgham [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref8">8</xref>] but increase in mungbean [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref19">19</xref>] has been documented. In the present study, Zn treatment to light grown seedlings prominently increased the chlorophyll and carotenoid content, while in dark grown seedlings it had marginal/no effect (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>(a)). This indicated that the steady state level of the pigments is getting affected by Zn rather than inducible level. Content of ALA, a regulatory metabolite and universal precursor for all the tetrapyrroles, was increased at higher Zn concentrations in both the regimes (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>(a)). Thus increased synthesis of chlorophylls as well as other heme containing proteins is likely to result by Zn supply. Increased ALA content may involve enhanced synthesis and the ALA synthesis was also found to be increased in both the regimes in light as well as dark that corresponds to chloroplastic and mitochondrial activities respectively, however, the effect was non significant (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>(b) and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>(b)). Thus it seems that Zn exerts lesser effect to enhance ALA synthesis. Further, Zn supply increased ALAD activity of light as well as dark grown seedlings being significant in former (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>(b) and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>(b)). Hence, the next step of chlorophyll biosynthetic pathway catalysed by ALAD involving formation of porphobilinogen from ALA seems to get affected by Zn. Further, ALADs from different sources are metalloenzymes that utilize a variety of divalent and monovalent cations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref11">11</xref>] ALAD requires Mg<sup>2+</sup> and Zn<sup>2+</sup> for its activity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref10">10</xref>] hence its activity is enhanced by Zn treatment. Moreover, in light grown seedlings the observed correlation for pigment content with Zn accumulation and shoot wt was very strong for both, +ve (0.862 and 0.862) and ?ve (0.836 and 0.807), respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>(a)). Also for ALA content and ALAD with shoot wt perfect ?ve correlation resulted (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>(b)). Moreover, ALAD has been reported to be a substrate-modulated enzyme [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.86756-ref24">24</xref>] . Hence, it is likely that during Zn treatment shoot growth and chlorophyll formation is mainly influenced by ALA and subsequently by ALAD in maize seedlings.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>ZnCl<sub>2</sub> treatment accumulated Zn in root as well as shoot tissue with more substantial increase in former. Zn supply reduced the overall growth of the maize seedlings at higher concentrations with more prominent effect in roots. Increase in protein and proline content by Zn was more prominent in root tissue than the shoot. Zn increased the chlorophyll, carotenoid and ALA content in the shoot tissue of light grown seedlings and the ALA content in dark grown seedlings also. Increase in ALA formation and ALAD activity also resulted by Zn being most significant in light grown seedlings. The results suggest that Zn accumulation and growth effect at higher Zn concentrations in maize depend upon the tissue with root as the target site and shoot growth are mainly influenced by ALA and subsequently ALAD in maize seedlings.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Waghmare, R.C. and Gadre, R. (2018) Impact of Essential Micronutrient, Zn, on Growth and Chlorophyll Biosynthesis in Young Zea mays Seedlings. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 9, 1855-1867. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2018.99135</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.86756-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jelakovic, S., Kopriva, S., Suss, K.H. and Schulz, G.E. (2003) Structure and Catalytic Mechanism of the Cytosolic D-ribulose-5-phosphate 3-epimerase from Rice. Journal of Molecular Biology, 326, 127-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(02)01374-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.86756-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Marschner, H. (1995) Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Academic Press, London, Vol. 2, 889.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.86756-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sagardoy, R., Vázquez, S., Florez-Sarasa, I.D., Albacete, A., Ribas-Carbó, M.J., Abadía, F.J. and Morales, F. (2010) Stomatal and Mesophyll Conductances to CO2 Are the Main Limitations to Photosynthesis in Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris) Plants Grown with Excess Zinc. New Phytologist, 187, 145-158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03241.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.86756-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cui, Y. and Zhao, N. (2011) Oxidative Stress and Change in Plant Metabolism of Maize (Zea mays L.) Growing in Contaminated Soil with Elemental Sulfur and Toxic Effect of Zinc. Plant Soil and Environment, 57, 34-39. https://doi.org/10.17221/193/2010-PSE</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.86756-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bonnet, M., Camares, O. and Veisseire, P. (2000) Effect of Zinc and Influence of Acremonium lolli on Growth Parameters, Chlorophyll a Fluorescence and Antioxidant Enzyme Activity of Ryegrass (Lolium perenne L. cv Apollo). Journal of Experimental Botany, 51, 945-953.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.86756-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Manivasagaperumal, R., Balamurugan, S., Thiyagarajan, G. and Sekar, J. (2011) Effect of Zinc on Germination, Seedling Growth and Biochemical Content of Cluster Bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub). Current Botany, 2, 11-15.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.86756-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sagardoy, R., Morales, F., Lopez-Millan, A.F., Abadia, A. and Abadia, J. (2009) Effects of Zinc Toxicity on Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Plants Grown in Hydroponics. Plant Biology, 11, 339-350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00153.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.86756-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mirshekali, H., Hadi, H., Amirnia, R. and Verdiloo, H.K. (2012) Effect of Zinc Toxicity on Plant Productivity, Chlorophyll and Zn Contents of Sorghum (Sorghum Bicolor) and Common Lambsquarter (Chenopodium album). International Journal of Agriculture Research and Review, 2, 247-254.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.86756-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ozdener, Y. and Aydin, B.K. (2010) The Effect of Zinc on the Growth and Physiological and Biochemical Parameters in Seedlings of Eruca sativa (L.) (Rocket). Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 32, 469-476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-009-0423-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.86756-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Beale, S.I. (1999) Enzymes of Chlorophyll Biosynthesis. Photosynthesis Research, 60, 43-73. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006297731456</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.86756-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jaffe, E.K. (2000) The Porphobilinogen Synthase Family of Metalloenzymes. Acta Crystallographica, 56, 115-128. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444999014894</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.86756-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lowry, O.H., Rosebrough, N.J., Farr, A.C. and Randall, R.J. (1951) Protein Measurement with the Folin-Phenol Reagent. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 193, 265-275.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.86756-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Webb, J.M. and Levy, H.B. (1958) New Developments in Chemical Determination of Nucleic Acid. In: Glick, D., Ed., Methods of Biochemical Analysis, Inter Science Publication, New York City, Vol. 6, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470110225.ch1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.86756-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bates, L.S., Walderren, R.P. and Teare, I.D. (1973) Rapid Determination of Free Proline for Water-Studies. Plant Soil, 39, 205-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.86756-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lichtenthaler, H.K. and Welburn, A.R. (1983) Determination of Total Carotenoids and Chlorophylls a and b of Extracts in Different Solvents. Biochemical Society Transactions, 11, 591-592. https://doi.org/10.1042/bst0110591</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.86756-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tewari, A.K. and Tripathy, B.C. (1998) Temperature-Stress-Induced Impairment of Chlorophyll Biosynthetic Reactions in Cucmber and Wheat. Plant Physiology, 177, 851-858. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.117.3.851</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.86756-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mauzerall, D. and Granik, S. (1956) The Occurrence and Determination of δ-Aminoleveulinic Acid Dehydratase and Porophobilinogen in Urine. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 219, 435-446.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.86756-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jain, M. and Gadre, R. (2004) Inhibition of 5-Amino Levulinic Acid Dehydratase Activity by Arsenic in Excised Etiolated Maize Leaf Segments during Greening. Journal of Plant Physiology, 161, 251-255. https://doi.org/10.1078/0176-1617-00879</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.86756-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Samreen, T., Humaria, S.H.U., Ullah, S. and Javid, M. (2017) Zn Effect on Growth Rate, Chlorophyll, Protein and Mineral Contents of Hydroponically Grown Mungbeans Plant (Vigna radiata). Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 10, S1802-S1807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.07.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.86756-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hasan, M.K., Cheng, Y., Kanwar, M.K., Chu, X.Y., Ahammed, G.J. and Qi, Z.Y. (2017) Responses of Plant Proteins to Heavy Metal Stress—A Review. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 1492. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01492</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.86756-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mishra, S. and Agrawal, S.B. (2006) Interactive Effects between Supplemental UV-B Radiation and Heavy Metals on Growth and Biochemical Characterstics of Spinacea oleracea L. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology, 18, 1-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.86756-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lalelou, F.S., Kolvanagh, J.S. and Fateh, M. (2013) Effect of Various Concentrations of Zinc on Chlorophyll, Starch, Soluble Sugars and Proline in Naked Pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo). International Journal of Farming and Allied Sciences, 2, 1198-1202.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.86756-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tucker, R.M. (1999) Essential Plant Nutrients: Their Presence in North Carolina Soils and Role in Plant Nutrition. 1-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.86756-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tchuinmogne, S.T., Hault, C., Auoules, A. and Balange, A.P. (1989) Inhibitory Effect of Gabaculine on 5-Aminolevulinnate Dehydratase in Raddish Seedlings. Plant Physiology, 90, 1293-1297. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.90.4.1293</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>