The minimal intervention dentistry approach is currently advocated for the treatment of carious lesions [1] [2] [3] . The infected, necrotic dentin with irreversibly altered collagen is removed, while affected dentin in which the collagen is amenable to reorganization is kept in the cavity [3] . Histologically, affected dentin consists of dentinal tubules obliterated by acid-resistant crystals during the remineralization process [4] [5] .

Recently, universal adhesive systems, which may be applied with or without phosphoric acid etching, have become commercially available [6] [7] [8] . Another important characteristic of these adhesive systems is the presence of MDP (10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate) as the functional monomer. This monomer, which has a pH of 2.7, is capable of molecular bonding to calcium hydroxyapatite, forming a stable, resistant hybrid layer [9] [10] that reduces nanoleakage [11] [12] . According to Tsuchiya et al. [13] , the bonding of MDP to hydroxyapatite helps prevent secondary carious lesions, improves the marginal seal, and enhances the durability of restorations.

Optimal sealing of the cavity enhances the longevity of dental restorations by cutting off the bacterial nutrient supply, thus halting progression of the carious lesion. However, recurrence of caries and postoperative sensitivity may occur due to the presence of viable microorganisms after cavity preparation. A review of the literature carried out for this study did not find any studies comparing the bond strength of the Single Bond Universal adhesive system to caries-affected dentin with or without phosphoric acid preconditioning. The decision to use a universal adhesive system with or without phosphoric acid can influence the adhesion in caries-affected dentin [12] [14] . Within this context, the objective of the present study was to evaluate the influence of phosphoric acid on the bond strength of the Single Bond Universal adhesive system to a carious substrate. The null hypothesis was that phosphoric acid etching would have no significant effect on the bond strength of the Single Bond Universal adhesive system.

The present study was approved by the institutional Research Ethics Committee (protocol no. 722184).

1) Sample selection

Forty permanent third molars were obtained from a university Dental Clinic.

2) Inclusion criteria

Erupted permanent third molars; no visible cracks, carious lesions or fractures on inspection with a magnifying glass (10X magnification) were included. The selected teeth were stored in saline solution (Eurofarma, São Paulo, Brazil) and disinfected with 0.1% thymol (Carcajon, Campinas, Brazil) [15] [16] . A diamond disc (Fava, São Paulo, Brazil) was used to expose the dentin on each specimen. The specimens were sanded with the aid of a polisher and 120- and 240-grit silicon carbide discs (Arotec, Cotia, Brazil), under constant cooling. This was followed by sanding with 400-grit paper (3M, Sumaré, Brazil) for 10 seconds to standardize the smear layer [17] . The teeth were rinsed in running water and stored in saline solution (Eurofarma, São Paulo, Brazil), under refrigeration, until the start of the study.

The apical region of the specimens was sealed with epoxy resin (TecBond, Embu das Artes, Brazil), and the root system and all crown enamel surfaces with nail polish (Impala, Guarulhos, São Paulo). Only the crown dentin was exposed to the cariogenic challenge. The specimens were then autoclaved (Sercon, São Paulo, Brazil) for 15 minutes at 121˚C and 1 atm.

3) Cariogenic challenge

To induce carious lesions in the exposed dentin, the teeth were placed in sterile test tubes containing Brain Heart Infusion medium (BHI, Labcenter, São Paulo, Brazil) supplemented with 0.5% yeast extract (Labcenter, São Paulo, Brazil), 0.5% glucose (Labcenter, São Paulo, Brazil), and 1% sucrose (Labcenter, São Paulo, Brazil)and a standard strain of S. mutans ATCC 25175 (Fundação André Tosello, Campinas, Brazil), standardized to 0.5 McFarland turbidity (Labcenter, São Paulo, Brazil).

Figure 11: Anaerobic jar used in the cariogenic challenge

Infected dentin was removed by hand with 320-grit silicon carbide sanding discs (3M, Sumaré, Brazil) until affected dentin was reached―characterized by tissue resistant to penetration by the probe (SSWhite, Juiz de Fora, Brazil) without applying pressure [15] .

4) Division of experimental groups

All samples with carious dentin lesions were randomly allocated (http://www.random.org) across four experimental groups (n = 10/each). The number of specimens in each group (n = 10) was obtained by sample size calculation after a pilot experiment. Sample size calculation was performed by ANOVA, with a minimum difference between treatment means = 0.38, standard error = 0.23, number of treatments = 4, statistical power = 0.80, and alpha = 0.05. The sample size was calculated as 10.

Group PA-I: etching of affected dentin with 35% phosphoric acid (Ultradent, South Jordan, UT, USA) for 15 seconds. The specimens were then rinsed and dried with cotton balls, without allowing dehydration. The Single Bond Universal adhesive system (3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA) was actively applied with a microbrush (Angelus, Londrina, Brazil) onto the entire dentin surface for 20 seconds. An air jet was then applied over the adhesive for 5 seconds, until the solvent had evaporated. Finally, the adhesive system was light-cured for 10 seconds (VALO-Ultradent, South Jordan, UT, USA). Microtensile bond strength testing was performed immediately.

Group PA-CC: the test specimens were prepared as for the PA-I group, but microtensile bond strength testing was performed after a 14-day cariogenic challenge.

Group NPA-I: the Single Bond Universal adhesive system (3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA) was actively applied with a microbrush (Angelus, Londrina, Brazil) onto the entire dentin surface for 20 seconds. An air jet was then applied over the adhesive for 5 seconds, until the solvent had evaporated. Finally, the adhesive system was light-cured for 10 seconds (VALO-Ultradent, South Jordan, UT USA). Microtensile bond strength testing was performed immediately.

Group NPA-CC: the test specimens were prepared as for the NPA-I group, but microtensile bond strength testing was performed after a 14-day cariogenic challenge.

After application of the adhesive system (Single Bond Universal, 3M ESPE), a restoration with Charisma composite resin (Heraeus Kulzer, Hanau, Germany) was constructed by the incremental technique atop the dentin surface, in four layers, each approximately 1 mm high, light-cured for 40 s each, until a total height of 3 mm was reached. The composite resin increments were measured with a digital caliper (Mitutoyo, Suzano, Brazil). The curing light used in this study (Valo, Ultradent, South Jordan, UT, USA) had an intensity of 1000 mW/cm², checked with a radiometer (Curing Light, Brasilia, Brazil).

5) Obtaining the specimens for microtensile bond strength testing

For microtensile bond strength testing, the root portion of each tooth was removed with diamond discs (Fava, São Paulo, Brazil). Each tooth/adhesive/resin block was cut with diamond discs on an Isomet 1000 precision sectioning saw (Buehler, Illinois, USA), into parallel slices following the long axis of the tooth, in the lingual-lingual direction. These slices were again attached to an acrylic plate and taken back to the Isomet 1000 precision cutter (Buehler, Illinois, USA), with a pre-set cutting width of 1.3 mm, so that the resulting stick-shaped specimens would have an area of approximately 1.0 mm² .

Before microtensile bond testing, the width and thickness of each specimen were confirmed with a digital caliper (Mitutoyo, Suzano, Brazil; accuracy 0.01 mm). Forty-four specimens were obtained from each group.

6) Microtensile bond strength test

The ends of the specimens were attached to the microtensile assay device (Geraldeli jig) with cyanoacrylate glue (Loctite, Henkel Ltda., São Paulo, SP, Brazil), so as to keep the adhesive area perpendicular to the long axis of the tensile force [6] .

The jig was then taken to a universal testing machine (EMIC, São José dos Pinhais, Brazil) and run with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min until fracture occurred [19] At the instant of fracture, the load in Newtons (N) recorded and the specimen examined under a 40X stereo microscope (Tecnival, São Paulo, Brazil) to ascertain the fracture mode (adhesive, cohesive dentin, cohesive resin, or premature). Only specimens with adhesive/mixed (interface) fractures were used for microtensile bond strength calculation [6] . The fracture load of each specimen was divided by its bonding area. For analysis of fracture mode findings, the following scores were assigned:

Score 1: premature fracture;

Score 2: adhesive fracture;

Score 3: cohesive dentin fracture;

Score 4: cohesive resin fracture.

All results were obtained in Newtons (N) and converted to megapascals (MPa) by the following formula:

B S = F S ∗ 0.0981

where BS = bond strength; F = force in Newtons; S = bond surface area of the specimen (cm²); 0.09801 = correction factor for conversion of kp/cm² into MPa.

7) Statistical analysis

The results were analyzed in Biostat 4.0. D’Agostino’s test showed that the sample departed from normality. Thus, the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test (with Student-Newman-Keuls post-hoc test) and Friedman test were used. The significance level was set at 5%.

The highest bond strengths were observed in the groups in which phosphoric acid etching preceded application of the self-etching adhesive system (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in bond strength before (immediate testing) and after cariogenic challenge (p > 0.05) (Table 1).

Analysis of fracture mode

There was no significant difference in fracture mode across sample groups (p > 0.05) (Table 2).

Contemporary dentistry advocates a minimally invasive approach to cavity preparations removing infected dentin while preserving caries-affected dentin that is amenable to reorganization [15] [20] [21] [22] [23] . The methodology of

Different letters denote significant differences (p < 0.05). PA-I, phosphoric acid etching followed by immediate testing; PA-CC, phosphoric acid etching followed by testing only after cariogenic challenge; NPA-I, immediate testing with no phosphoric acid etching; NPA-CC, testing only after cariogenic challenge, with no phosphoric acid etching.

Same letters: No significant differences (p > 0.05).

this study used affected dentin as a substrate for bond strength testing, a design consistent with previous work by Nakajima et al. [24] , Yoshiyama et al. [2] . Arrais et al. [25] , Erhardt et al. [5] , De Carvalho et al. [26] , Carvalhoet al. [27] , Scheffel et al. [3] , Becci et al. [15] , Lenzi et al. [4] , Mattos et al. [28] , and Li et al. [29] .

In the present study, the microbiological method was used to induce dentinal caries [3] [18] [23] by challenge with a S. mutans and supplemented culture medium. The microbiological cariogenic challenge was used in this study to reproduce the characteristics found in natural carious dentin, such as discoloration and changes in texture [1] [4] [26] [27] [30] . Shibata et al. [14] and Sattabanasuk et al. [20] reported the need for standardization of the method used to remove carious lesions in studies seeking to evaluate the bond strength of adhesive systems. In the present study, infected dentin was removed while affected dentin was preserved by using the standard method described by Arrais et al. [25] , Becci et al. [15] , and Scheffel et al. [3] . Infected dentin was worn down with 320-grit15 silicon carbide sandpaper until resistance to manual pressure with a dental explorer was encountered.

Bond strength was evaluated with a microtensile test [4] [6] [12] [19] [21] [24] [25] [26] [31] [32] . Stick-shaped specimens with a cross-sectional area of approximately 1 mm² were obtained for better stress distribution during the test, in an attempt to reduce the number of cohesive failures, as is common in the shear test [33] .

To evaluate the longevity of the bond strength of the Single Bond Universal adhesive system, the specimens were subjected to a cariogenic challenge, i.e., a 14-day stress period in supplemented BHI medium. In the literature, samples have usually been stored in distilled water [5] [31] [32] or artificial saliva for assessment of bond-strength longevity [17] . In the present study, however, specimens restored with composite resin were exposed to a microbiological cariogenic challenge with the objective of simulating what happens to composite resin restorations in the oral cavity of patients with recurrent caries. Our literature did not find any previous studies with a similar methodology.

The results of the present investigation demonstrated that phosphoric acid etching enhanced the bond strength of the universal adhesive system to affected dentin. The null hypothesis was not accepted. This is in agreement with the findings of Yoshiyama et al. [2] , Ceballos et al. [34] , Arrais et al. [25] , Li et al. [29] , Aggarwal et al. [35] , and Naik et al. [36] . Caries-affected dentin is characterized by occlusion and ultimately obliteration of the dentinal tubules by acid-resistant crystals; application of phosphoric acid solubilizes these intratubular mineral deposits, increasing the permeability of dentin and, consequently, improving penetration of the adhesive agent.

Bond strength was lower when acid etching was not employed. This is consistent with the findings of Pinna et al. [37] , who reported that self-etching adhesives fail to effectively penetrate dentinal tubules occluded by the carious process, and of Ceballos et al. [34] and Arrais et al. [25] , who noted that the acid monomer present in the self-etching adhesive system is not enough to dissolve the mineral deposits found in caries-affected dentin and allow penetration of the adhesive system. Arrais et al. [25] reported that this is an inefficient pH for penetration of the adhesive agent into caries-affected dentin. Regarding fracture patterns in the present study, adhesive-type fractures were predominant; this corroborates the findings of Shibata et al. [14] in caries-affected dentin. Only the group of specimens subjected to cariogenic stress without phosphoric acid etching exhibited premature fractures (20%). This is consistent with the findings of Scholtanus et al. [38] , who reported that this fracture mode is attributable to intrinsic failures of the dental substrate and composite resin material. The difficulty of penetration by the adhesive system caused by obliteration of caries-affected dentinal tubules and compounded by the carioenic stress probably explains the percentage of premature fractures in this group [2] [25] [34] .

Within the limitations of an in vitro design, the present study demonstrated that, in caries-affected dentin, a substrate characterized by obliteration of dentinal tubules and altered mineral content, the use of phosphoric acid etching prior to application of the Single Bond Universal adhesive system was associated with better results. However, additional studies in this line of research are needed to contribute further scientific evidence on this matter.

We conclude that:

Phosphoric acid etching increased the bond strength of the Single Bond Universal adhesive system to caries-affected dentin; and the pattern of fracture was predominant adhesive.

Cariogenic challenge did not interfere with bond strength.

Pavanello, R. and Pinheiro, S.L. (2018) Influence of Phosphoric Acid Etching on the Bond Strength of a Universal Adhesive System to Caries-Affected Dentin. Advances in Biological Chemistry, 8, 37-46. https://doi.org/10.4236/abc.2018.83004