<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMMCE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4077</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmmce.2018.63020</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMMCE-84333</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Engineering</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Hydrometallurgical Processing of a Nigerian Galena Ore in Nitric Acid: Characterization and Dissolution Kinetics
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ikechukwu</surname><given-names>A. Nnanwube</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Okechukwu</surname><given-names>D. Onukwuli</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Chemical Engineering, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>09</day><month>04</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>271</fpage><lpage>293</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>1,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2018</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>1,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2018</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>4,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2018</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The physico-chemical characterization and dissolution kinetics study of a Nigerian galena ore in nitric acid has been undertaken. The effects of acid concentration, temperature, particle size, stirring speed and solid/liquid ratio on the leaching of galena were investigated. The X-ray fluorescence data showed that the galena ore used in the study exists mainly as PbS. Lead (Pb) was detected as the major metal for galena with metals such as Na, Ca, Fe, Zn, Al and Mg occurring as minor elements. The XRD analysis also confirmed the originality of the galena ore as it revealed that galena exists mainly as lead sulphide (PbS). The Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) analysis also supported the XRF and XRD analysis by revealing the presence of sulphur in the ore. The scanning electron micrograph (SEM) analysis revealed a high level of crystallinity of the ore. Results of the leaching studies showed that galena dissolution in nitric acid (HNO
  <sub>3</sub>) increases with increasing concentration of nitric acid, temperature and stirring rate, and decreases with increasing particle diameter and solid/liquid ratio. In 10 M HNO
  <sub>3</sub> at a temperature of 90
  &#176;C using 75 μm particle diameter with solid/liquid ratio of 20 g/L and stirring speed of 540 rpm, about 84.5% of galena was dissolved in 150 minutes. The values of activation energy, order of reaction and Arrhenius constant calculated at the conditions above for galena were 27.01 KJ/mol, 0.93, 26.71 s
  <sup>-1</sup> respectively. The mechanism of dissolution of galena was established to follow the shrinking core model for the diffusion controlled mechanism, with surface chemical reaction as the rate controlling step for the leaching process. Finally, the XRD analysis of the post-leaching residue revealed the presence of gahnite and anglesite.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Galena</kwd><kwd> Nigeria</kwd><kwd> Characterization</kwd><kwd> Leaching</kwd><kwd> Dissolution Kinetics</kwd><kwd> Nitric Acid</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Galena, also called lead glance, is the natural mineral form of lead (II) sulphide. It is the most important ore of lead and an important source of silver. It is one of the most abundant and widely distributed sulphide minerals. It crystallizes in the cubic crystal system often showing octahedral forms. It is often associated with the minerals sphalerite, calcite and fluorite [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>In general, many occurrences of the lead and zinc ores are known in Nigeria, Such as those of Ameka, Ameri and Enyigba near Abakaliki, at Benue and Zurak to name only few. It is estimated that there are at least 30 lodes within an aggregate length of about 600 m as detailed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>Lead metal has several useful mechanical properties, including high density, low melting point, ductility, and relative inertness [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref4">4</xref>] . Lead has been used for bullets since their invention in the middle ages. It is inexpensive; its low melting point means small arms ammunition and shot gun pellets can be cast with minimal technical equipment; and it is denser than other common metals, which allows for better retention of velocity.</p><p>Its high density and resistance to corrosion have been exploited in a number of related applications. It is used as ballast in sailboat kneels [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref5">5</xref>] . Its weight allows it to counterbalance the heeling effect of wind on the sails; being so dense it takes up a small volume and minimizes water resistance. It is used in Scuba diving weight belts to counteract the diver’s buoyancy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref6">6</xref>] . Because of its corrosion resistance, lead is used as a protective sheath for underwater cables [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>In general, the recovery of lead from galena via a hydrometallurgical route has been studied by several investigators under various chemical conditions. A hydrometallurgical alternative has been sought because of the growing concern about the adverse environmental impact of high-temperature processing of galena as detailed by Feurstenau et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref8">8</xref>] . A detailed review of some previous studies on the characterization and dissolution kinetics of galena varieties in acid and oxidative reagents is presented in the following sections.</p><sec id="s1_1"><title>1.1. Galena Ore Characterization</title><p>Several studies on the characterization of galena ore have been carried out in the recent past. Some of the reported results on the composition of galena from different parts of the world are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>Galena is composed of lead as a dominant metal followed by sulphur, iron and zinc in that order. The composition of galena varies from one location to another. The different values can be accounted for by the variation in geochemical and environmental effects. The richest galena was found in Japan as reported by Awakura et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref9">9</xref>] , Nigeria: Olanipekun [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref10">10</xref>] and USA: Feurstenau et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref8">8</xref>] ; while the poorest was in Mexico: Makita et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref11">11</xref>] and China: Wang et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref12">12</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s1_2"><title>1.2. Galena Dissolution Kinetic Studies</title><p>Aydogan et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref13">13</xref>] investigated the kinetics of galena dissolution in nitric acid</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Elemental composition (%) of galena mineral from various origin</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Reference</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Origin</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="14"  >Major elemental composition (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >As</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Si</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Al</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ca</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ag</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Abraitts et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref23">23</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >United Kingdom</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Awakura et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref9">9</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Japan</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aydogan et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref18">18</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sivas, Turkey</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cisneros-Gonzalez et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref24">24</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Penoles, Mexico</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Feurstenau et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref8">8</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kansas, USA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Harvey and Yen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref25">25</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gourvenour Canada</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Makita et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref11">11</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chihvahua, Mexico</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Olanipekun [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref10">10</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Abakaliki, Nigeria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pacholewska [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref26">26</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ZHG, Proles Law, S/Africa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Silva [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref1">1</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Callagham, Australia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wang et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref12">12</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >China</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>-: Not analyzed.</p><p>solutions with hydrogen peroxide. The galena used was obtained from Sivas, Turkey. 0.5 M HNO<sub>3</sub> was used, in the presence of 1 M H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>. The temperature range used was 27˚C - 60˚C. The activation energy was calculated to be 42.26 KJ/mol while the reaction order was calculated as 0.92.</p><p>Warren et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref14">14</xref>] investigated the effect of chloride ion on the ferric chloride leaching of galena concentrate, using galena obtained from Alabama, Tuscaloosa. 0.2 M FeCl<sub>3</sub> was used in the presence of 4 M NaCl and 0.1 M HCl. The temperature range used was 27˚C - 57˚C. The activation energy was estimated to be 72.10 KJ/mol while the reaction order was calculated as 0.21.</p><p>Baba and Adekola [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref15">15</xref>] carried out a comparative study of the dissolution kinetics of the galena ore in binary solutions of FeCl<sub>3</sub>/HCl and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>/HCl. The dissolution kinetics of the galena was found to depend on leachant concentration, reaction temperature, and stirring speed, while it decreases with the increase of solid-to-liquid ratio and particle diameter. The activation energy (E<sub>a</sub>) of 26.5 KJ/mol was obtained for galena ore dissolution in 0.3 M FeCl<sub>3</sub>/8.06 M HCl, and it suggests the surface diffusion model for the leaching reaction, while the E<sub>a</sub> value of 40.6 KJ/mol was obtained for its dissolution in 8.06 M H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>/8.06 M HCl, which suggests the surface chemical reaction model for the leaching reaction. Furthermore, the linear relationship between rate constants and the reciprocal of the particle radius supports the fact that dissolution is controlled by the surface reaction in the two cases. Finally, the rate of reaction based on the reaction-controlled process was described by a semi-empirical mathematical model. The Arrhenius and reaction constants of 11.023 s<sup>−1</sup>, 1.25 &#215; 10<sup>4</sup> and 3.65 &#215; 10<sup>2</sup>, 8.02 &#215; 10<sup>6</sup> were calculated for the 0.3 M FeCl<sub>3</sub>/8.06 M HCl and 8.06 M H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>/8.06 M HCl binary solutions respectively.</p><p>Liu et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref16">16</xref>] studied the acidic, non-oxidative dissolution of galena (PbS) nanocrystals using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to follow the evolution of the size and shape of the nanocrystals before and after dissolution experiments, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) to follow particle chemistry, and dissolution rate analysis to compare dissolution rates between nanocrystalline and bulk galena. Dissolution characteristics were also studied as a function of nanocrystals access to bulk versus confined solution due to the degree of proximity of next-nearest grains. Detailed XPS analysis showed the nanocrystals to be free of unwanted contamination, surface complexes, and oxidative artifacts, except for small amounts of lead-containing oxidation species in both pre- and post-dissolution samples which have been observed in fresh, natural bulk galena.</p><p>According to Gerson and O’Dea [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref17">17</xref>] , surface species found on galena during oxidation and dissolution has been studied using many techniques. It has been assumed that complexation takes place at the surface of hydrous galena sulphides. The adsorption of H<sup>+</sup> ions onto a surface of the S atom in the aqueous phase is found to be favourable, whereas the adsorption unto the surface of Pb atom is not favourable as suggested by Aydogan et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref18">18</xref>] . In view of the above reasons, the dissolution rates are often analyzed with the shrinking core models which state that the leaching process is controlled by:</p><p>1) the diffusion of the reactant through the solution boundary layer or through a solid product layer; or</p><p>2) by the rate of chemical reaction; or</p><p>3) by mixed controlled process, which are chemical and diffusion controlled reactions as reported by Baba [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref19">19</xref>] , Levenspiel [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref20">20</xref>] and Merwe [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref21">21</xref>] .</p><p>Therefore, understanding the mechanism of a leaching system is an important aspect of this work, while a knowledge of the kinetics of the rate controlling process and solid reaction products are crucial for a complete understanding of the system as evidenced by Aydogan et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref18">18</xref>] .</p><p>The non-oxidative leaching of the base metal sulphide ore including galena in acidic solution, releasing hydrogen sulphide has been studied in various laboratories and tested in pilot plants as demonstrated by Awakura et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>Generally, there are insufficient kinetic studies to explain the complete mechanism of the dissolution of galena in nitric acid solution in the literature. Most of the available dissolution studies did not address some basic important kinetic parameters such as reaction order, activation energy, Arrhenius factors and correlation constant. This often makes the proposition of the dissolution mechanism difficult. Results of selected kinetic studies on galena dissolution extracted from literature are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>.</p><p>It is evident from <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> that most of the kinetics parameters necessary for the prediction of the actual dissolution mechanism (activation energy, reaction order, residual product, etc.) were lacking and thus making the mechanism proposition to be ambiguously difficult. Consequently, the scope of this investigation is to address these problems. Due to the increased demand for lead in Nigeria and other developing countries of the world, there is the need to develop simple and practicable routes for the recovery of this valuable metal from Nigerian galena ore which is among the richest in the world [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref22">22</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>The galena ore used for this study was collected from Abakaliki, Enyigba mining site in Ebonyi State of Nigeria. The galena ore was finely pulverized and sieved into five fractions: 75, 106, 212, 300, and 425 &#181;m. All experiments were performed with 75 &#181;m fraction except otherwise stated. Solutions of HNO<sub>3</sub> were prepared from analytical grade reagents with deionized water.</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Characterization of the Ore</title><sec id="s2_1_1"><title>2.1.1. Spectrophotometric Analysis</title><p>The X-ray fluorometer (XRF), X-supreme 600 oxford instruments was used for the elemental analysis of the ore. The mineralogical analysis of the ore was done using ARL X’TRA X-ray Diffractometer, Thermoscientific with the serial number 197492086 and Empyrean by PanAnalytical model with CuKα (1.54 &#197;) radiation generated and 40 mA and 45 kV. This unit comprises of a single compact cabinet. The cabinet houses a high speed, high precision Goniometer; high efficiency generator (X-ray) and an automatic sample loading facility.</p><p>The petrographic slides of galena ore were prepared using Epoxy and Lakeside 70 media according to the method of Hutchison [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref27">27</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_1_2"><title>2.1.2. FTIR and SEM Analysis</title><p>FTIR analysis was carried out using Buck Scientific M530 Infrared Spectrophotometer. SEM analysis was carried out using Q250 by FEI model from the Netherlands.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Leaching Procedure</title><p>Leaching experiments were performed in a 500 ml glass reactor fitted with a condenser to prevent losses through evaporation. The two major variables (heat and stirring rate) necessary for accelerating the rate of chemical reaction was provided by the aid of a magnetically-stirred hot plate (Model 78HW-1). For every leaching experiment, the solution mixture was freshly prepared by dissolving 20 g/L of the ore sample in the acid solution at 90˚C. The concentration which gave the maximum dissolution was subsequently used to study other leaching parameters including temperature and particle size. At the end of each reaction time, the undissolved materials in the suspension was allowed to settle and separated by filtration. The resulting solutions were diluted and analyzed for lead using atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS).</p><p>The mole fraction of lead passing into the solution from galena was calculated by the formula given in Equation (1), where x designates quantity dissolution.</p><p>x = Amount of Pb passing into the solution Amount of Pb in original sample (1)</p><p>The activation energy, E a , and rate constants were evaluated from the Arrhenius plots. The post-leached residues after dissolution in the optimum conditions were subjected to XRD and SEM examination.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Results of Characterization Studies</title><sec id="s3_1_1"><title>3.1.1. Elemental Composition by XRF</title><p>The results of the elemental composition of galena by X-ray fluorescence technique showed that the galena mineral exist mainly as PbS with metals such as Na, Mg, Al, Ca, Fe and Zn occurring as minor elements, and K, Cr, and Sr as traces. The elemental analysis gave Pb (60.01%), S (14.66%), Fe (4.32%), Na (3.78%), Si (7.69%), Mg (1.21%), Al (1.94%), P (1.37%), Cl (1.19%), K (0.09%), Ca (1.99%), Cr (0.01%), Mn (0.49%), Zn (1.22%), and Sr (0.04%).</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_2"><title>3.1.2. Phase Studies by XRD</title><p>The analysis of galena by X-ray diffraction gives a better description in terms of the mineral phases present in the ore. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> present the results of the X-ray diffractogram of the ore and shows that the ore exist mainly as lead sulphide (PbS).</p><p>The galena ore gave three major peaks at 2.96, 3.42, and 2.09 &#197;, respectively as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. All these supported the results of the elemental analysis by XRF.</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_3"><title>3.1.3. FTIR Analysis of Galena</title><p>The FTIR spectra of galena ore is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. The spectrum of the ore exhibit absorption bands at 3821 cm<sup>−1</sup>, 3652 cm<sup>−1</sup>, 3353 cm<sup>−1</sup>, 2958 cm<sup>−1</sup>, and 2564 cm<sup>−1</sup>. These are attributed to O-H stretching. The band at 1410 cm<sup>−1</sup> is attributed to O-H bending. The bands at 3519 cm<sup>−1</sup>, 3353 cm<sup>−1</sup> and 2564 cm<sup>−1</sup> are attributed to N-H stretching. The band at 2564 cm<sup>−1</sup> which is attributed to S-H</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> The X-ray diffraction data of the galena ore showing the angle 2θ and d-values of the compounds identified, with their relative intensity (%)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >2θ</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >d-Value (&#197;)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Compound</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Intensity (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >JCPDS file No.</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Galena (PbS)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01-078-1056</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Galena (PbS)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01-078-1056</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Galena (PbS)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01-078-1056</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Galena (PbS)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01-078-1056</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Galena (PbS)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01 -078-1056</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Galena (PbS)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01-078-1056</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Galena (PbS)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01-078-1056</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>JCPDS File No.: Joint Committee on Power Diffraction Standards File Number.</p><p>stretching confirms the presence of sulphur in the ore. The band at 1634 cm<sup>−1</sup> is attributed to Si-O and Al-O stretching while the band at 1634 cm<sup>−1</sup> is also attributed to Al-O-H stretching.</p><p>The FTIR result is in agreement with XRF and XRD results which confirmed the presence of the minerals detected.</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_4"><title>3.1.4. SEM Analysis of Galena</title><p>The scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of galena ore was obtained with magnifications of 240&#215;, 520&#215;, 1000&#215;, and 1500&#215; respectively as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>.</p><p>The average cell diameter of the ore ranges from 8 to 62 &#181;m while the average cell density ranges from 0.0042 to 1.13 cells/mm. The results indicate that the ore particles are very cohesive, forming an aggregate mass that appeared to have been formed by several flaky particles stacked together in form of agglomerates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref28">28</xref>] . The particles have irregular shapes with rough edges, and are highly crystalline due to the high level of purity of the ore.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Leaching Studies</title><sec id="s3_2_1"><title>3.2.1. Effect of HNO<sub>3</sub> Concentration on Galena Dissolution</title><p>The results of the effect of HNO<sub>3</sub> concentration on galena dissolution are illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>. The result shows that the fraction of galena dissolved increases with increasing acid concentration. The yield of lead obtained with 12 M HNO<sub>3</sub> is slightly lower than that obtained with 10 M HNO<sub>3</sub>, and this could be attributed to a change in the rate determining step due to the significant quantity of elemental sulphur produced [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>In all cases, unreacted acid remained in the leach solution and the free acid increased with increasing initial acid concentration, since the use of more concentrated acid did not increase the dissolution of galena or decrease the leaching time for maximum dissolution. Therefore, 10 M HNO<sub>3</sub> was used for further investigation.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_2"><title>3.2.2. Effect of Stirring Rate on Galena Dissolution</title><p>The results on the effect of stirring rate on galena dissolution in 10 M HNO<sub>3</sub> over the range of 90 - 720 rpm at 363 K are presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> shows that the amount of galena dissolved is dependent on the stirring speed over the range 90 - 540 rpm. Above 540 rpm, the stirring speed no</p><p>longer has any observable effect on the solid dissolution. Hence dissolution reached a steady rate at 540 rpm, and a stirring speed of 540 rpm was retained for further experiments. Increase in stirring speed causes a decrease in the thickness of the film layer, therefore, causing an increase in the dissolution rate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref29">29</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_3"><title>3.2.3. Effect of Temperature on Galena Dissolution</title><p>The effect of temperature on galena dissolution has been investigated over the temperature range 303 - 363 K in 10 M HNO<sub>3</sub> solution at a stirring rate of 540 rpm using 75 &#181;m particle diameter and solid/liquid ratio of 20 g/L. These results are presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>.</p><p>As seen in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>, galena dissolution increases with increasing temperature. This is as a result of high kinetic energy available for the reacting molecules [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref29">29</xref>] . For instance, at 363 K, the amount of galena dissolved within 150 min was 85.2%.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_4"><title>3.2.4. Effect of Particle Diameter on Galena Dissolution</title><p>The influence of particle diameter on galena dissolution in HNO<sub>3</sub> was investigated for five different sized fractions. The results are summarized in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>.</p><p>The results from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> showed that the smaller the galena particle size, the higher was the fraction of galena dissolved. This is attributed to larger specific surface area provided by the smaller particles for contact with the acid molecules [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref29">29</xref>] . This observation was also supported by Aydogan et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref13">13</xref>] and Dutrizac and MacDonald [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref30">30</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_5"><title>3.2.5. Effect of Solid/Liquid Ratio on Galena Dissolution</title><p>The results on the effect of solid/liquid ratio on galena dissolution in 10 M HNO<sub>3</sub> were investigated in the range 0.02 to 0.045 g/ml at a temperature of 363 K.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref> shows the effect of solid/liquid ratio on galena dissolution in 10 M HNO<sub>3</sub>. Decreasing the solid/liquid ratio is accompanied with increase in the equilibrium percentage of the ore dissolved. For instance, by varying the solid/liquid ratio from 0.045 to 0.02 g/ml, the percentage of galena dissolved increased from 47% to 84% at 363 K. This could be attributed to the decrease in the fluid reactant per unit weight of the solid [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref29">29</xref>] . Accordingly, an optimum solid/liquid ratio of 0.02 g/ml has been retained for subsequent studies.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Discussions</title><sec id="s3_3_1"><title>3.3.1. Dissolution Kinetic Models</title><p>For this study, three shrinking core models were tested for better understanding</p><p>of the dissolution of galena in HNO<sub>3</sub> media. The kinetic models as previously utilized by some authors such as Aydogan et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref18">18</xref>] , Baba and Adekola [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref31">31</xref>] , Habashi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref32">32</xref>] , Khalique et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref33">33</xref>] , Leao [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref34">34</xref>] and Merwe [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref21">21</xref>] include:</p><p>1 − ( 1 − X ) 1 / 3 = b k s C A ρ s r o t = k 2 t (2)</p><p>1 + 2 ( 1 − X ) − 3 ( 1 − X ) 2 / 3 = 6 b D e C A ρ s r o 2 t = k 3 t (3)</p><p>1 − ( 1 − X ) 1 / 3 + ( y / 6 ) [ ( 1 − X ) 1 / 3 + 1 − 2 ( 1 − X ) 2 / 3 ] = k 4 t (4)</p><p>where X is the fraction of galena dissolved at time t, b the stoichiometric coefficient of the reagent in the leaching reaction, k s the kinetic constant, C A the concentration of nitric acid (HNO<sub>3</sub>), ρ s the density of the solid, r o the initial radius of the solid, and k<sub>2</sub> the rate constant from Equation (2). D ϵ is the effective diffusion coefficient, k<sub>3</sub> and k<sub>4</sub> are the rate constants for Equations ((3) and (4)) respectively, y is taken to be 1 for heterogeneous systems.</p><p>Equation (2) is applicable to a chemical reaction controlled process at the interface; Equation (3) is a diffusion-controlled process through the product layer and Equation (4) is a mixed controlled process (a combination of surface reaction and diffusion). Of all the three models tested, all the studied data were found only to fit the relation in Equation (3) with a perfect correlation of about 0.99. The analysis of the plots of other kinetic curves, however, gave lower correlation coefficients. Hence, the linearization of Figures 4-8 was made. To this end, the relation: 1 + 2 ( 1 − X ) − 3 ( 1 − X ) 2 / 3 = k 1 t , gave an average correlation coefficient of 0.994 and this is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>.</p><p>From <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>, the experimental rate constant k<sub>1</sub>, was calculated from the slope of the straight line at various HNO<sub>3</sub> concentrations and the plots of Ink<sub>1</sub> versus In[HNO<sub>3</sub>] are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0.</p><p>From <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0, the slope of the resulting plot gave 0.93. This shows that the order of reaction with respect to H<sup>+</sup> ion concentration is 0.93 with correlation coefficient of 0.990.</p><p>Similarly, the apparent rate constant k<sub>5</sub> was calculated from the slope of the straight line at various stirring rates (w) as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1 and the plots of Ink<sub>5</sub> versus Inw are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2.</p><p>Furthermore, the data in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> at different temperatures were linearized by Equation (3). This is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3. The data in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref> were also linearized by means of Equation (3) as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>5 and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>6 respectively.</p><p>From <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3, the apparent rate constants, k<sub>3</sub> and other tested constants, k<sub>2</sub> and k<sub>4</sub> were calculated from the slopes of the straight lines. The values of these rate constants with their equivalent correlation coefficients are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>.</p><p>By using the rate constants derived from the slopes in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3, the Arrhenius diagram in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>4 was plotted from which the activation energy of 27.01 KJ mol was calculated, which supports the proposed diffusion controlled mechanism. The Arrhenius constant for the process was estimated to be 26.71 s<sup>−1</sup> with a correlation coefficient of 0.985. In some instances and as reported by Olanipekun [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref35">35</xref>] , the rate controlling mechanism of the heterogeneous dissolution</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> The values of rate constants k<sub>2</sub>, k<sub>3</sub> and k<sub>4</sub> with their correlation coefficients for galena dissolution at different temperatures by 10 M HNO<sub>3</sub></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Temperature (˚C)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Apparent rate constants (10<sup>−3</sup> min<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Correlation coefficient, R<sup>2</sup></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >k<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >k<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >k<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >k<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >k<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >k<sub>4</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.809</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.997</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.789</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.798</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.997</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.773</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.799</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.994</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.765</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.864</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.996</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.824</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.848</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.995</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.801</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>process could either be predicted from plots of the kinetic equations or from the activation energy.</p><p>In general and as demonstrated by Aydogan et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref18">18</xref>] , it has been accepted that a diffusion-controlled process is characterized by a slight dependence on temperature, while the chemically controlled process is strongly dependent on temperature. The reason being that diffusion coefficient, D, is linearly dependent on temperature formulated as: k = A e − E a / R T , where A is the Arrhenius constant, E<sub>a</sub> is the activation energy, R is the Boltzmann constant and T is the absolute temperature. The activation energy calculated for this study appears to be the lowest compared to other reported works as summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>. The galena ore obtained from Abakaliki can therefore be said to be kinetically</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Some reported activation energies for galena leaching by different leaching systems</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Origin of galena</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Leachant</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >E<sub>a</sub> (KJ/mol)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >References</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sivas, Turkey</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 M HNO<sub>3</sub>/1 M H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aydogan et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref13">13</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sivas, Turkey</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 M CH<sub>3</sub>COOH/0.5 M H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aydogan et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref18">18</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bor, Yugoslavia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 M H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>/2 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Antonijevic et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref36">36</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Abakaliki, Nigeria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.06 M H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>/8.06 M HCl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Baba and Adekola [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref31">31</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Abakaliki, Nigeria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 M HNO<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >This work</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>more favorable to leaching by HNO<sub>3</sub> compared to other galena types.</p><p>According to Olanipekun [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref35">35</xref>] , the rate controlling mechanism of heterogeneous dissolution process is often predicted from the plots of the kinetic equations, rather than the activation energy. Therefore, in order to determine the rate determining step for the present study, the kinetic curves in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> were also linearized by means of Equation (3). The values of the rate constants, k<sub>4</sub>, were plotted against the reciprocal of the particle radii (1/r<sub>o</sub>), yielding a linear relationship with a correlation coefficient of 0.995 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>9). It is worthy of note that the plot of the rate constants as a function of the square of particle radii (1/r<sub>o</sub>)<sup>2</sup> did not give a linear relationship. This indicates that the surface chemical reaction was the rate controlling step during the dissolution. Hence, the diffusion of the H<sup>+</sup> ion was at higher rate because of the high transport number in aqueous solution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref22">22</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_2"><title>3.3.2. Dissolution Model</title><p>From the effects of the solid/liquid ratio (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>7) and particle diameters (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>8) on galena dissolution in 10 M HNO<sub>3</sub> solution, the apparent rate constants, k<sub>6</sub> and k<sub>7</sub> were evaluated, respectively.</p><p>The solid/liquid ratio and initial particle size (d<sub>p</sub>) were found to be inversely proportional to 1.99 power (S/L)<sup>−</sup><sup>1.99</sup> and 0.94 power ( d p − 0.94 ), respectively. Hence, the proposed model equation for galena dissolution by 10 M HNO<sub>3</sub> solution at 90˚C is consistent with the following relation:</p><p>1 + 2 ( 1 − X ) − 3 ( 1 − X ) 2 / 3 = k o C HNO 3 0.93 ( d p ) − 0.94 ( ρ S L ) − 1.99 ( w ) 0.79 e ( − 27012 / R T ) t</p><p>where ρ is the ore density (Baba and Adekola, 2011). k<sub>o</sub> is a reaction constant, which can be determined from the fraction of galena ore dissolved, X at a given time, t. The parameter, X is determined experimentally. For instance, at 90˚C, the value of X = 0.845 (84.5% dissolution); k<sub>o</sub> is calculated to be 3.54 &#215; 10<sup>8</sup>. The value of k<sub>o</sub>, however, is found to vary depending on the leaching systems/conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref37">37</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Characterization of the Residual Product</title><sec id="s3_4_1"><title>3.4.1. SEM Analysis of Galena Leached with 10 M HNO<sub>3 </sub></title><p>The scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of galena leached with 10 M HNO<sub>3</sub></p><p>was obtained with magnifications of 150&#215;, 500&#215; and 1000&#215; respectively as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>0. The average cell diameter ranges from 26 &#181;m to 104 &#181;m while the average cell density ranges from 0.0938 cell/mm to 0.156 cell/mm. The results above indicate an increase in the diameter of the particles and a corresponding decrease in density as the particle volume automatically increases and therefore decreases the specific gravity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref28">28</xref>] . The micrographs of the leaching residues show a progressive increase in the roughness of the solid and also an increase in the amount of elemental sulphur covering the particle surfaces [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84333-ref38">38</xref>] . The particles have irregular shapes and may be poorly crystalline due to acid attack.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4_2"><title>3.4.2. XRD Analysis of Galena Leached with 10 M HNO<sub>3 </sub></title><p>The analysis of galena leached with 10 M HNO<sub>3</sub> at 90˚C by X-ray diffraction gives a description of the mineral phases present in the residue. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> present the results of the X-ray diffractogram of the residue with important compounds identified. The result showed two major and one minor peaks at 4.51, 2.26, and 1.51 &#197;, respectively. The XRD data revealed the presence of gahnite and anglesite as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>1. The XRD result agrees with the SEM result of the residue. In summary, the overall dissolution reaction of galena in HNO<sub>3</sub> solution can be described by the following stoichiometry:</p><p>PbS ( s ) ( galena ) + 2 H ( aq ) + ⇄ Pb ( aq ) 2 + + H 2 S ( g ) ( ≅ 85 % releasedintosolution )</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>Based on the results of the characterization and leaching investigations undertaken in this study, the following conclusions can be drawn:</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> The X-ray diffraction data of the galena ore leached with 10 M HNO<sub>3</sub> showing the angle 2θ and d-values of the compounds identified, with their relative intensity (%)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >2θ</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >d-Value (&#197;)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Compound</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Intensity (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >JCPDS file No.</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gahnite (Zn<sub>8</sub>Al<sub>16</sub>O<sub>32</sub>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96-900-7041</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anglesite (Pb<sub>4</sub>S<sub>4</sub>O<sub>16</sub>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96-900-4485</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anglesite (Pb<sub>4</sub>S<sub>4</sub>O<sub>16</sub>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96-900-4485</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anglesite (Pb<sub>4</sub>S<sub>4</sub>O<sub>16</sub>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96-900-4485</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gahnite (Zn<sub>8</sub>Al<sub>16</sub>O<sub>32</sub>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96-900-7041</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gahnite (Zn<sub>8</sub>Al<sub>16</sub>O<sub>32</sub>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96-900-7041</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anglesite (Pb<sub>4</sub>S<sub>4</sub>O<sub>16</sub>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96-900-4485</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gahnite (Zn<sub>8</sub>Al<sub>16</sub>O<sub>32</sub>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96-900-7041</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gahnite (Zn<sub>8</sub>Al<sub>16</sub>O<sub>32</sub>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96-900-7041</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>1) The X-ray fluorescence data showed that the galena ores used in the study exist mainly as PbS. Lead (Pb) was detected as the major metal for galena with metals such as Na, Ca, Fe, Zn, Al and Mg occurring as minor elements. The XRD analysis also confirmed the originality of the galena ore as it revealed that galena exists mainly as lead sulphide (PbS). The Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) analysis also supported the XRF and XRD analysis by revealing the presence of sulphur. The scanning electron micrograph (SEM) analysis revealed a high level of crystallinity of the ore.</p><p>2) The leaching investigation clearly showed that galena dissolution in nitric acid (HNO<sub>3</sub>) increases with increasing concentration of nitric acid, temperature and stirring rate, and decreases with increasing particle diameter and solid/liquid ratio. In 10 M HNO<sub>3</sub> at a temperature of 90˚C using 75 &#181;m particle diameter with solid/liquid ratio of 20 g/L and stirring speed of 540 rpm, about 84.5% of galena was dissolved in 150 minutes. The values of activation energy, order of reaction and Arrhenius constant calculated at the conditions above for galena were 27.01 KJ/mol, 0.93, 26.71 s<sup>−1</sup>.</p><p>3) The results of the dissolution studies indicated that the data fitted the shrinking core model for the diffusion controlled mechanism, with surface chemical reaction as the rate controlling step. This is consistent with the following relation:</p><p>1 + 2 ( 1 − X ) − 3 ( 1 − X ) 2 / 3 = k 0 C HNO 3 0.93 ( d p ) − 0.94 ( ρ S L ) − 1.99 ( w ) 0.79 e ( − 27012 / R T ) t ; where k<sub>0</sub></p><p>is the reaction constant, which can be determined experimentally.</p><p>4) The post-leaching residue was found to be constituted of gahnite and anglesite.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Nnanwube, I.A. and Onukwuli, O.D. (2018) Hydrometallurgical Processing of a Nigerian Galena Ore in Nitric Acid: Characterization and Dissolution Kinetics. Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, 6, 271-293. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmmce.2018.63020</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.84333-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Da Silva, G. (2004) Kinetics and Mechanism of the Bacterial and Ferric Sulphate Oxidation of Galena. Hydrometallurgy, 75, 99-110.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2004.07.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84333-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ukpong, E.E. and Olade, M.A. (1979) Geochemical Surveys for Lead-Zinc Mineralization, Southern Benue Trough, Nigeria. Transactions of Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 88B, 81-92.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84333-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rahman, M.A.O. (2004) Nigeria’s Minerals Endowment and Sustainable Development. 2nd Mosobalaje Oyawoye Endowed Faculty of Science Lecture, University of Ilorin, Unilorin Press, Illorin, 1-40.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84333-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baird, C. and Cann, N. (2012) Environmental Chemistry. 5th Edition, W. H. Freeman and Company, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84333-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Parker, R.B. (2005) The New Cold-Molded Boatbuilding: From Lofting to Launching. Wooden Boat Publications, Brooklin.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84333-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Krestovnikoff, M. and Halls, M. (2006) Scuba Diving. Dorling Kindersley, London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84333-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jensen, C.F. (2013) Online Location of Faults on AC Cables in Underground Transmission. Springer, Berlin.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84333-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Feursternau, M.C., Nebo, C.O., Elango, B.V. and Han, K.H. (1987) The Kinetics of Leaching Galena with Ferric Nitrate. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 18, 25-30.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84333-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Awakura, Y., Kamei, S. and Majima, H. (1980) A Kinetic Study of Non-Oxidative Dissolution of Galena in Aqueous Acid Solution. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 11, 377-381. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02676882</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84333-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Olanipekun, E.O. (2000) Quantitative Leaching of Galena. Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Ethiopia, 14, 25-32. https://doi.org/10.4314/bcse.v14i1.71994</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84333-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Makita, M., Esperon, M., Lopez, B.P. and Orrantia, E. (2004) Reduction of Arsenic Content in a Complex Galena by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. BMC Biotechnology, 4, 22-38. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-4-22</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84333-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, S., Fang, Z., Wang, Y. and Chen, Y. (2003) Electronegative Leaching of Galena with Ferric Chloride. Minerals Engineering, 16, 869-872.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84333-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aydogan, S., Erdemoglu, M., Ucar, G. and Aras, A. (2007) Kinetics of Galena Dissolution in Nitric Acid Solutions with Hydrogen Peroxide. Hydrometallurgy, 88, 52-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2007.03.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84333-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Warren, G.W., Kim, S. and Henein, H. (1986) The Effect of Chloride Ion on the Ferric Chloride Leaching of Galena Concentrate. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 18, 59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02658432</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84333-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baba, A.A. and Adekola, F.A. (2011) Comparative Analysis of the Dissolution Kinetics of Galena in Binary Solutions of HCl/FeCl3 and HCl/H2O2. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials, 18, 9-17.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-011-0393-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84333-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, J., Aruguete, D.M., Jinschek, J.R., Rimstidt, J.D. and Hochella, M.F. (2008) The Non-Oxidative Dissolution of Galena Nano-Crystals: Insights into Mineral Dissolution Rates as a Function of Grain Size, Shape, and Aggregation State. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 72, 5984-5996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2008.10.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84333-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gerson, R.A. and O’Dea, A.R. (2003) A Quantum Chemical Investigation of the Oxidation and Dissolution Mechanism of Galena. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 67, 813-822.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84333-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aydogan, S., Erdemoglu, M., Ucar, G. and Aras, A. (2007) Dissolution Kinetics of Galena in Acetic Acid Solutions with Hydrogen Peroxide. Hydrometallurgy, 89, 189-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2007.07.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84333-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baba, A.A. (2008) Recovery of Zinc and Lead from Sphalerite, Galena and Waste Materials by Hydrometallurgical Treatments. University of Ilorin, Ilorin, 675.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84333-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Levenspiel, O. (1972) Chemical Reaction Engineering. 2nd Edition, John Wiley &amp; Sons, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84333-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Merwe, W. (2003) Dissolution of Sphalerite Minerals from Rosh Pinah Tailings, Magister Scientiae. Faculty of Natural and Agric. Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 106.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84333-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baba, A.A. and Adekola, F.A. (2012) A Study of Dissolution Kinetics of a Nigerian Galena Ore in Hydrochloric Acid. Journal of Saudi Chemical Society, 16, 377-386.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscs.2011.02.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84333-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abraitts, P.K., Pattrick, R.A.D., Kelsall, G.H. and Vaughan, D.J. (2004) Acid Leaching and Dissolution of Major Sulphide Ore Minerals: Processes and Galvanic Effects in Complex System. Mining Magazine, 68, 343-351.  
https://doi.org/10.1180/0026461046820191</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84333-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cisneros-Gonzalez, I., Oropeza-Guzman, M. and Gonzalez, T. (2000) Galena and Sphalerite Process in Acidic Chloride Media, Electrochemistry in Mineral and Metal Processing. Proceedings of the Electrochemical Society, No. 14, 248-254.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84333-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Harvey, T.J. and Yen, W.T. (1998) The Influence of Chalcopyrite, Galena and Pyrite on the Selective Extraction of Zinc from Base Metal Sulphide Concentrates. Minerals Engineering, 11, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-6875(97)00135-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84333-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Pacholewska</surname><given-names> M. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2004</year>)<article-title>Bioleaching of Galena Flotation Concentrates</article-title><source> Physicochemical Problems of Mineral Processing</source><volume> 38</volume>,<fpage> 281</fpage>-<lpage>291</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84333-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hutchison, C.S. (1974) Laboratory Handbook of Petrography Techniques. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, 1-14.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84333-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bendou, S. and Amrani, M. (2014) Effect of Hydrochloric Acid on the Structural of Sodic-Bentonite Clay. Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, 2, 404-413. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmmce.2014.25045</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84333-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ajemba, R.O. and Onukwuli, O.D. (2012) Application of the Shrinking Core Model to the Analysis of Alumina Leaching from Ukpor Clay using Nitric Acid. International Journal of Engineering Research &amp; Technology, 1, 1-13.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84333-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dutrizac, J.E. and MacDonald, R.J.C. (1977) CIM Annual Volume, 186-194.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84333-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baba, A.A. and Adekola, F.A. (2010) Hydrometallurgical Processing of a Nigerian Sphalerite in Hydrochloric Acid: Characterization and Dissolution Kinetics. Hydrometallurgy, 101, 69-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2009.12.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84333-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Habashi</surname><given-names> F. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2005</year>)<article-title>Hydrometallurgy of Lead</article-title><source> Metallurgia</source><volume> 59</volume>,<fpage> 114</fpage>-<lpage>118</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84333-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khalique, A., Akram, A., Ahmed, A.S. and Hamid, N. (2005) Effect of Sodium Chloride on Dissolution of Galena in Aqueous Acid Solution. Pakistan Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 48, 236-239.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84333-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Leao, V.A., Souza, A.D., Pina, P.S., Silva, C.A. and Siqueira, P.F. (2007) The Leaching Kinetics of a Zinc Sulphide Concentrate in Acid Ferric Sulphate. Hydrometallurgy, 89, 72-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2007.05.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84333-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Olanipekun, E.O. and Oderinde, R.A. (1999) Hydrochloric Acid Leaching of Sphalerite in the Presence of an Oxidizing Agent. Pakistan Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 42, 204-208.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84333-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Antonijevic, M.M., Jankovic, Z.D. and Dimitrijevic, M.D. (2004) Kinetics of Chalcopyrite Dissolution by Hydrogen Peroxide in Sulphuric Acid. Hydrometallurgy, 71, 329-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-386X(03)00082-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84333-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fuerstenau, M.C., Nebo, C.O., Elango, B.V. and Han, K.N. (1986) The Kinetics of Leaching Galena with Ferric Nitrate. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 18, 25-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02658428</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84333-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Souza, A.D., Pina, P.S. and Leao, V.A. (2007) Bioleaching and Chemical Leaching as an Integrated Process in the Zinc Industry. Minerals Engineering, 20, 591-599.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2006.12.014</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>