<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Agricultural Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2156-8553</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/as.2018.94033</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AS-84320</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  A Brief Study on pH, Exchangeable Ca&lt;sup&gt;2+&lt;/sup&gt; and Mg&lt;sup&gt;2+&lt;/sup&gt; in Farmlands under Tobacco-Rice Rotation in Xuancheng City of South Anhui
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Anqi</surname><given-names>Wang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ka</surname><given-names>Lin</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chengxin</surname><given-names>Ma</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Qin</surname><given-names>Gao</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Qifa</surname><given-names>Zhu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Xuejun</surname><given-names>Ji</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>Zhang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>Xue</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chaolong</surname><given-names>Zu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chaoqiang</surname><given-names>Jiang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jia</surname><given-names>Shen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Decheng</surname><given-names>Li</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Institute of Tobacco Science, Anhui Agricultural Academy of Sciences, Hefei, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Wannan Tobacco Co. Ltd., Xuancheng, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, China</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>dcli@issas.ac.cn(DL)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>28</day><month>03</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>480</fpage><lpage>488</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>1,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2018</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>27,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2018</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>30,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2018</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  pH, exchangeable Ca
  <sup>2+</sup> and Mg
  <sup>2+</sup> of soil can influence the yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco. Xuancheng city is the dominant tobacco-planting region in Anhui province since 2008. A general soil survey was conducted in Xuancheng city to understand the current situations of pH, exchangeable Ca
  <sup>2+</sup> and Mg
  <sup>2+</sup> of farmlands under tobacco-rice rotation and to decide whether continuous applying dolomite powders to abate soil acidification. In total 124 topsoil samples (0-20 cm) were collected from the typical farmlands and soil pH, exchangeable Ca
  <sup>2+</sup> and Mg
  <sup>2+</sup> were measured. The results showed that soil pH and Ca
  <sup>2+</sup> and Mg
  <sup>2+</sup> in Xuancheng city were generally in the suitable grades, pH ranged from 4.56 to 8.42 with an average of 5.87, exchangeable Ca
  <sup>2+</sup> ranged from 1.01 cmol(1/2Ca
  <sup>2+</sup>) kg
  <sup>-1</sup> to 100.55 cmol(1/2Ca
  <sup>2+</sup>) kg
  <sup>-1</sup> with an average of 11.07 cmol(1/2Ca
  <sup>2+</sup>) kg
  <sup>-1</sup>, and exchangeable Mg
  <sup>2+</sup> ranged from 0.14 cmol(1/2Mg
  <sup>2+</sup>) kg
  <sup>-1</sup> to 2.86 cmol(1/2Mg
  <sup>2+</sup>) kg
  <sup>-1</sup> with an average of 0.81 cmol(1/2Mg
  <sup>2+</sup>) kg
  <sup>-1</sup>, all spanned from the low grades to the high grades. To the whole Xuancheng city, 37.10%, 62.10% and 72.58% of the surveyed farmlands were in the low grades of pH, exchangeable Ca
  <sup>2+</sup> and Mg
  <sup>2+</sup>, respectively, while 52.42%, 25.00% and 20.97% of the farmlands were in the suitable grades, respectively. pH had an extremely significantly positive Napierian logarithm correlation with exchangeable Ca
  <sup>2+ </sup>and an extremely significantly positive power correlation with exchangeable Mg
  <sup>2+</sup>. In total about 338.2 kg&#183;hm
  <sup>-2</sup> of Ca
  <sup>2+</sup> and 202.4 kg&#183;hm
  <sup>-2 </sup>of Mg
  <sup>2+</sup> are annually input into the farmlands, while about 110.4 kg&#183;hm
  <sup>-2</sup> of Ca
  <sup>2+</sup> and 7.4 kg&#183;hm
  <sup>-2</sup> of Mg
  <sup>2+</sup> are annually moved out from the farmlands, exchangeable Ca
  <sup>2+ </sup>and Mg
  <sup>2+</sup> were annually increased by 225.2 kg&#183;hm
  <sup>-2</sup> and 187.6 kg&#183;hm
  <sup>-2</sup> in the farmlands, respectively. It is necessary to monitor the farmlands dynamically in order to decide whether continuous applying dolomite powders which should be dependent upon the specific conditions of individual farmlands.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>pH</kwd><kwd> Exchangeable Ca&lt;sup&gt;2+&lt;/sup&gt; and Mg&lt;sup&gt;2+&lt;/sup&gt;</kwd><kwd> Dolomite Powders</kwd><kwd> Farmlands</kwd><kwd>  Tobacco-Rice Rotation</kwd><kwd> Xuancheng City</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>pH, exchangeable Ca<sup>2+</sup> (exc. Ca<sup>2+</sup>) and Mg<sup>2+</sup> (exc. Mg<sup>2+</sup>) of soil can influence the yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84320-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84320-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84320-ref3">3</xref>] . For tobacco planting, the reasonable soil pH is ranged from 5.5 to 7.0, while the suitable exc. Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup> are from 6 to 10 cmol(1/2Ca<sup>2+</sup>) kg<sup>−1</sup> and 1.0 to 1.6 cmol(1/2Mg<sup>2+</sup>) kg<sup>−1</sup>, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84320-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84320-ref5">5</xref>] . However, most of the tobacco planting farmlands in south China are acid and insufficient in exc. Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84320-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84320-ref7">7</xref>] , so it is common to apply dolomite powders (C<sub>2</sub>CaMgO<sub>6</sub>), quicklime (CaO) or calcium magnesium phosphate fertilizer to adjust soil pH and supply Ca and Mg nutrients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84320-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84320-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84320-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84320-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>Xuancheng city is the dominant tobacco planting region in Anhui province since 2008 with a regular tobacco-planting area of about 1 &#215; 10<sup>4</sup> hm<sup>2</sup> (constituted by 90% more of the tobacco-planting area in Anhui province) and a yield of tobacco leaves of about 1 &#215; 10<sup>4</sup> t [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84320-ref11">11</xref>] . Similarly, the tobacco-planting farmlands in Xuancheng city also face the same problems of acidification and insufficient exc. Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84320-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84320-ref13">13</xref>] , for example, the area percentage of the farmlands with pH &lt; 5.5 was increased from 30% of total farmland in 1980’s (data of the 2<sup>nd</sup> National Soil Survey) to 60% of the total farmland in 2007 (data of the Soil Testing and Formulated Fertilization Project). Thus, dolomite powders which are alkaline and rich in Ca and Mg have been widely even intensively in the recent decade [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84320-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84320-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84320-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>Currently, the local farmers urgently want to know the present situations of soil pH and exc. Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup> in the farmlands in order to decide whether continues applying dolomite powders. Thus, in December 2015 a general soil survey was conducted in Xuancheng city in which topsoil samples (0 - 20 cm) were collected from the typical farmlands under tobacco-rice rotation and soil pH, exc. Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup> were measured.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methods and Materials</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. General Situation of Xuancheng City</title><p>Xuancheng city is located in the south Anhui province (117˚58'E - 119˚40', 29˚57' - 31˚19'N) with a total area of 1.23 &#215; 10<sup>4</sup> km<sup>2</sup>, the mean annual sunshine duration, temperature, precipitation, dryness and frost-free period is 1784 h, 15.6˚C, 1200 - 1500 mm, 0.68 - 0.90 and 240 d, respectively, the landform is complex and diverse, mountains, hills and valley basins are interlaced in the south with a mean altitude of 1200 - 1800 m, hills and downlands are distributed in the middle with a mean altitude of 15 - 100 m, while alluvial plains are dominant in the north with a mean altitude of 7 - 12 m. The tobacco-planting soils are mainly paddy soils mainly under tobacco-rice rotation. The annual fertilization is pure N 90 - 120 kg∙hm<sup>−2</sup> with N:P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>:K<sub>2</sub>O of 1:1.4 - 1.7:3.2 - 3.5 in the tobacco planting season while pure N 180 - 225 kg∙hm<sup>−2</sup> with N:P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>:K<sub>2</sub>O of 1:0.5:0.8 in the rice planting season. For acid farmland (topsoil pH &lt; 5.5), about 1500 kg∙hm<sup>−2</sup> of 250 μm-diameter dolomite powders are applied before planting tobacco, which is proved to increase soil pH by one unit [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84320-ref8">8</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.1. Soil Sampling and Measurement</title><p>Based on the database of tobacco farmers of Wannan Tobacco Ltd. Company in 2015, in total 124 typical tobacco-planting farmlands were determined according to their spatial distributions (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>), these farmlands belonged to different model tobacco farmers due to their excellent skills in flue-cured tobacco planting and great planting area (about 2 - 7 hm<sup>2</sup>) of tobacco.</p><p>Random multipoint method was used for the topsoil sampling (0 - 20 cm) in each typical farmland. Soil samples were air dried, ground and passed 1 mm and 0.25 mm sieves, then pH was determined by potentiometer, exc. Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup> were by atomic absorption spectrophotometer after extracted by ammonium acetate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84320-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84320-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84320-ref16">16</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.2. Classification of Soil pH and Exc. Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup></title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> is the grading standards of soil pH and exc. Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup> for tobacco planting [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84320-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84320-ref5">5</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.3. Data Processing and Thematic Mapping</title><p>Data were analyzed with Microsoft Excel 2013 and IBM Statistics SPSS 20.0, the spatial distribution of topsoil samples was mapped on the platform of Esri Arc-GIS 10.3.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussions</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. General Statistics of Soil pH and Exc. Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup></title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> shows the statistic information of topsoil pH and exc. Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup> of typical tobacco planting farmlands in Xuancheng.</p><p>For soil pH, it ranged from the low grade to the high grade in the whole Xuancheng city, also ranged from the low grade to the high grade in Xuanzhou district, Langxi county and Jing county, meanwhile ranged from the low grade to the suitable grade in Jingde county, Guangde county and Ningguo city.</p><p>For soil exc. Ca<sup>2+</sup>, it ranged from the low grade to the high grade in the whole Xuancheng city, also ranged from the low grade to the high grade in Xuanzhou</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Regional distribution of surveyed farmlands under tobacco-rice rotation in Xuancheng</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Region</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Xuanzhou district</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Langxi county</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Jingde county</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Jing county</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Guangde county</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ningguo city</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sample No.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >124</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Classification of soil pH and exchangeable Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup> for tobacco planting</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Soil indicator</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Low</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Suitable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >High</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5 - 7.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;7.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Exc. Ca<sup>2+</sup> [cmol(1/2Ca<sup>2+</sup>) kg<sup>−1</sup>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 - 10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Exc. Mg<sup>2+</sup> [cmol(1/2Mg<sup>2+</sup> kg<sup>−1</sup>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0 - 1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;1.6</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>district, Langxi county, Jingde county, Jing county and Guangde county, meanwhile from the low grade to the suitable grade in Ningguo city.</p><p>For soil exc. Mg<sup>2+</sup>, it ranged from the low grade to the high grade in the whole Xuancheng city, also ranged from the low grade to the high grade in Xuanzhou district, Langxi county, Jingde county, Jing county and Guangde county, meanwhile only concentrated in the low grade in Ningguo city.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Statistics of Grade Proportions of Soil pH and Exc. Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup></title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> shows the sample number distribution in various grades of soil pH and exc. Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup>.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Statistics of topsoil pH and exc. Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup> of farmlands under tobacco-rice rotation in Xuancheng</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Indicators</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Xuanzhou<sup> </sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Langxi</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Jingde</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Jing</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Guangde</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ningguo</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >pH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Range</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.56 - 8.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.69 - 8.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.81 - 6.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.96 - 8.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.83 - 6.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.58 - 6.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.56 - 8.42</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean/S.D.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.99/0.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.59/0.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.58/0.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.25/1.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.61/0.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.51/0.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.87/0.87</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Exc. Ca<sup>2+</sup> cmol(1/2Ca<sup>2+</sup>) kg<sup>−1 </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Range</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.06 - 95.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.29 - 19.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.77 - 10.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.34 - 100.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.01 - 13.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.64 - 8.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.01 - 100.55</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean/S.D.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.43/19.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.16/4.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.13/2.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.56/31.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.77/3.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.80/2.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.07/19.77</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Exc. Mg<sup>2+</sup> cmol(1/2Mg<sup>2+</sup>) kg<sup>−1 </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Range</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14 - 2.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.51 - 2.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.55 - 1.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19 - 2.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14 - 2.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39 - 0.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14 - 2.86</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean/S.D.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.81/0.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.96/0.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.95/0.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.82/0.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.79/0.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.53/0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.81/0.49</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Grade distribution of pH and exc. Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup> in typical farmlands under tobacco-rice rotation in Xuancheng</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Region</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >pH</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Exch. Ca<sup>2+</sup> [cmol(1/2Ca<sup>2+</sup>) kg<sup>−1</sup>]</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Exch. Ma<sup>2+</sup> [cmol(1/2Mg<sup>2+</sup> kg<sup>−1</sup>]</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Suitable (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >High (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Suitable (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >High (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Suitable (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >High (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xuanzhou</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Langxi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jingde</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.76</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.45</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Guangde</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.69</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ningguo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.45</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>To the whole Xuancheng city, 37.10% (46 farmlands), 62.10% (77 farmlands) and 72.58% (90 farmlands) of the topsoil samples were in the low grades of pH, exc. Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup>, respectively, which indicate these tobacco planting farmlands still need continuously apply dolomite powders. 52.42% (65 farmlands), 25.00% (31 farmlands) and 20.97% (26 farmlands) of the topsoil samples were in the suitable grades of pH, exc. Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup>, respectively, which suggest these tobacco planting farmlands should postpone applying dolomite powders. 10.49% (13 farmlands), 12.90% (16 farmlands) and 6.45% (8 farmlands) of the topsoil samples were in the high grades of pH, exc. Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup>, respectively, which prove these tobacco planting farmlands should immediately stop applying dolomite powders.</p><p>The severest low pH phenomenon occurred in Langxi county, 72.73% of its farmlands were in the low grade, meanwhile, there was little difference in other regions in low pH proportions of their farmlands, ranged from 31.03% to 46.15% of their total farmlands. The severest high pH phenomenon happened in Jing county, 20.69% of its farmlands were in the high grade, followed by Xuanzhou district and Langxi county, 14.28% and 10.49% of their total farmlands were in the high grade, meanwhile no farmland in Jingde county, Guangde county and Ningguo city in the high grade.</p><p>The severest low exc. Ca<sup>2+</sup> phenomenon occurred in Langxi county, 90.91% of its farmlands were in the low grade, followed by Ningguo city, 75.00% of its total farmlands were in the low grade. There was little difference in Jingde county, Jing county and Xuanczhou district in low exc. Ca<sup>2+</sup> proportions of farmlands, ranged from 54.17% to 61.90% of their total farmlands. The severest high exc. Ca<sup>2+</sup> phenomenon happened in Jing county, 20.69% of its farmlands were in the high grade, followed by Xuanzhou district, 16.66% of its total farmlands were in the high grade. There was little difference in other regions in low exc. Ca<sup>2+</sup> proportions of farmlands, ranged from 4.76% to 9.09% of their total farmlands.</p><p>The severest low exc. Mg<sup>2+</sup> phenomenon appeared in Ningguo city, all farmlands were in the low grade, followed by Guangde county, Xuanzhou district and Jing county, 84.62%, 76.19% and 72.41% of their total farmlands were in the low grade, meanwhile 54.55% and 57.14% of their total farmlands were in the low grade in Langxi county and Jingde county. No farmland was in the high grade in Ningguo city, while there was little difference in other regions in high exc. Mg<sup>2+</sup> proportions of the farmlands, ranged from 3.45% to 9.52% of their total farmlands.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Relationship between Soil pH and Exc. Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup></title><p>The optimal regression models between soil pH and exc. Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup> were established by using IBM Statistics SPSS20.0 (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>), the models show that pH had an extremely significantly positive Napierian logarithm correlation with exc. Ca<sup>2+</sup> and an extremely significantly positive power correlation with exc. Mg<sup>2+</sup>. The above equations prove that pH will increase fast initially but then increase slowly and tends to be stable with the increase of Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup>, such a phenomenon is conform to the results in other studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84320-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84320-ref18">18</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Estimation on Input and Output exc. Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup> in Farmland</title><p>Exogenous Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup> usually are input into the farmlands by fertilization and applying dolomite powders. According to the fertilization information [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84320-ref19">19</xref>] , about 2.2 kg∙hm<sup>−2</sup> and 7.4 kg∙hm<sup>−2</sup> of Ca<sup>2+</sup> are annually input into the farmlands by fertilization during tobacco-planting season and rice-planting season, respectively, while no Mg<sup>2+</sup> in these fertilizers. About 336 kg∙hm<sup>−2</sup> of Ca<sup>2+</sup> and 195 kg hm<sup>−2</sup> of Mg<sup>2+</sup> are input into the farmlands by applying dolomite powders 1500 kg∙hm<sup>−2</sup>, thus, in total about 338.2 kg∙hm<sup>−2</sup> of Ca<sup>2+</sup> and 202.4 kg∙hm<sup>−2</sup> of Mg<sup>2+</sup> are annually input into the farmlands.</p><p>Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup> usually are moved out of the farmlands by harvest of tobacco and rice. Tobacco leaves are harvested while tobacco stems are removed out from the farmlands to avoid disease spread. According to measured data of 62 tobacco samples collected from Xuancheng during 2007-2008, the average concentrations of Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup> are 17.0 g∙kg<sup>−1</sup> and 2.8 g∙kg<sup>−1</sup>, respectively with the total biomass of 4500 kg∙hm<sup>−2</sup> (tobacco leaves plus stems), thus, about 76.5 kg∙hm<sup>−2</sup> of Ca<sup>2+</sup> and 12.6 kg∙hm<sup>−2</sup> of Mg<sup>2+</sup> are annually removed out from the</p><p>farmlands. The average concentrations of Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup> are about 0.3 g∙kg<sup>−1</sup> and 0.8 g∙kg<sup>−1</sup> in rice ears [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84320-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84320-ref21">21</xref>] with the total rice-ear biomass of 7500 kg∙hm<sup>−2</sup>, thus, about 0.2 kg∙hm<sup>−2</sup> of Ca<sup>2+</sup> and 0.6 kg∙hm<sup>−2</sup> of Mg<sup>2+</sup> are annually removed out from the farmlands, thus, in total, about 17.2 kg∙hm<sup>−2</sup> of Ca<sup>2+</sup> and 13.2 kg∙hm<sup>−2</sup> of Mg<sup>2+</sup> are annually carried out from the farmlands.</p><p>According to the above data, the net annual increase of Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup> in the farmlands are 321.0 kg∙hm<sup>−2</sup> and 188.9 kg∙hm<sup>−2</sup>, respectively, which prove the application of dolomite powders not only promote pH of farmlands, but also simultaneously increase exc. Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup> of farmlands.</p><p>Over high pH and exc. Ca<sup>2+</sup> or Mg<sup>2+</sup> is unsuitable for tobacco planting, further data analysis roughly showed that the farmlands with 3 times or more application of dolomite powders usually are potential in the high grades of pH, exc. Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup>. So it is necessary to monitor the farmlands dynamically in order to decide whether continuous applying dolomite powders which should be dependent upon the specific conditions of individual farmlands.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>Our survey showed that the application of dolomite powders really increased soil pH and supplied Ca and Mg nutrients in the farmland under tobacco-rice rotation, however, 40% - 70% of the farmlands still were in low pH and exc. Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup> which need continuous applying dolomite powders, meanwhile 6% - 13% of the farmlands were in high pH and exc. Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup> which should stop applying dolomite powders immediately, whether continuous applying dolomite powders should be dependent upon the specific conditions of individual farmlands.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This study was supported by the Program of Anhui Branch of China National Tobacco Co. (20150551009), the External Operation Program of BIC, Chinese Academy of Sciences (151432KYSB2015007), and the Intergovernmental Special Program of National Key R&amp;D Plan (2016YFE0112700) and Sino-EU Cooperation Programme iSQAPER. We also thank the supports and help from the Soil and Fertilization Station of Xuancheng in data supply and field sampling activity.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Wang, A.Q., Lin, K., Ma, C.X., Gao, Q., Zhu, Q.F., Ji, X.J., Zhang, G., Xue, L., Zu, C.L., Jiang, C.Q., Shen, J. and Li, D.C. (2018) A Brief Study on pH, Exchangeable Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup> in Farmlands under Tobacco-Rice Rotation in Xuancheng City of South Anhui. Agricultural Sciences, 9, 480-488. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2018.94033</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.84320-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Institute of Tobacco Research of CASS (2005) Tobacco Cultivation of China. Shanghai Science and Technology Press, Shanghai.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84320-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, G.S. (2003) Tobacco Cultivation. China Agriculture Press, Beijing.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84320-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">ISSAS, CTC and SQM (1993) Atlas of Flue-Cured Tobacco Nutrition and Disorder Symptoms. Jiangsu Science and Technology Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84320-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, Y.T., Xie, J.P. and Li, Z.H. (2010) Tobacco Planting Regionalization of China. Science Press, Beijing.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84320-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liang, H. (2014) Evaluation of Soil Fertility Status for Tobacco Growing. Southwest University, Chongqing.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84320-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, J.H., Li, Z. H., Liu, J.L., et al. (2004) Evaluation of Nutrients Condition in Major Tobacco Production Region of China. Acta Tabacaria Sinica, 10, 14-18.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84320-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhao, D.K., Wang, S.J., Liu, X.P., et al. (2006) Study on Using Dolomite Powders to Adjust Soil pH of Flue-Cured Planting Fields. Journal of Anhui Agriculture Sciences, 34, 4694.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84320-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, G., Zhu, Q.F., Guo, X.S., et al. (2014) Amelioration of Dolomite on Acidity of Flue-Cured Tobacco Soil in South Anhui. Soils, 46, 534-538.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84320-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, G., Zhu, Q.F., Xiang, Z.H., et al. (2015) The Influence of Magnesium Fertilizer on Flue-Cured Tobacco Growth Yield and Quality in South Anhui. Soils, 47, 177-182.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84320-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lv</surname><given-names> Y.H.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Zhan P.S.</surname><given-names> Ma</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> W.J.</surname><given-names> et al. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2004</year>)<article-title>Influence of Lime and Serpentine-Fused Phosphate on Tobacco Production and Soil Acidity Regulation</article-title><source> Ecology and Environment</source><volume> 13</volume>,<fpage> 379</fpage>-<lpage>381</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84320-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ji, X.J., Shen, S.D., Xue, L., et al. (2013). Soil Taxonomy of Typical Tobacco Fields in Xuancheng of Southern Anhui. Soils, 45, 763-765.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84320-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhu, C.L., Ji, X.J., Ma, C.X., et al. (2010) Relationship between Mineral Elements in Flue-Cured Tobacco Leaves, Cultivated Soils and Burnt-Sweet Smelling Formation in South Anhui. Soils, 42, 26-32.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84320-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, G., Ji, X.J., Li, D.C., et al. (2012) On Quantitative Evaluation and Spatial Distribution of Major Properties for Tobacco Soil in Xuancheng City of Anhui Province. Soils, 44, 873-879.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84320-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lu, R.K. (1999) Methods of Soil Agricultural Chemistry Analyses. China Agriculture Press, Beijing.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84320-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bao, S.D. (2005) Soil Agricultural Chemistry Analyses. China Agriculture Press, Beijing.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84320-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, G.L. and Gong, Z.T. (2012) Soil Survey Laboratory Methods. Science Press, Beijing.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84320-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, S.Q., Zhang, S.R., Wu, J., et al. (2002) Relationship between Soil pH and CaCO3 Content. Soils, 34, 279-283.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84320-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">He, J., Zhao, Y.P. and Guan, L.Z. (2011) Effect of Free Calcium Carbonate on Soil pH and Enzyme Activities. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 42, 614-617.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84320-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jiang, C.Q., Shen, J., Wang, H.Y., et al. (2016) Effect of Tobacco Straw Incorporation on Rice Yield and Nutrient Absorption and Its Substitute for Potassium Fertilizer. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 27, 3969-3976.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84320-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yang, L.P., Xu, S.D., Wang, X.B., et al. (2012) Effects of Combined Application of Zn, Mg and K on Growth and Quality of Tobacco. Hunan Agricultural Sciences, 23, 45-48.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84320-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, G.Q., Yuan, J., Ju, X.R., et al. (2017) Study on the Characteristics of Elements Content and the Discrimination of the Origin of Rice in Different Producing Areas. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 38, 61-70.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>