<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJAnes</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Anesthesiology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2164-5531</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojanes.2018.84013</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJAnes-84091</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Practical Artificial Ventilation in an African Tropical Environment: Experience of the Intensive Care Unit of the University Hospital of Treichville
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Irié</surname><given-names>Bi Gohi Serge</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ango</surname><given-names>Privat Désiré</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Netro</surname><given-names>Djohoui</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Pete</surname><given-names>Yaich</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nabintou</surname><given-names>Koné</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kouadio</surname><given-names>Konan Stéphanie</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ogondon</surname><given-names>Bernard</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Able</surname><given-names>Edmond</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Boua</surname><given-names>Narcisse</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Brouh</surname><given-names>Yapo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Resuscitation Department, University Hospital Center of Treichville, Abidjan, Ivory Coast</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Resuscitation Department, University Hospital Center of Cocody, Abidjan, Ivory Coast</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Resuscitation Department, University Hospital Center of Bouake, Bouake, Ivory Coast</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>iriebi_gohiserge@yahoo.fr(IBGS)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>04</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>123</fpage><lpage>129</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>24,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2018</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>24,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2018</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>27,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2018</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Objective: To describe the practice of artificial ventilation (VA) in a resuscitation unit of a developing country with a view to its improvement. Patients and Methods: Prospective study for descriptive and analytical purposes, carried out in the intensive care unit of the University and Hospital Center of Treichville (Ivory Coast) from April 2009 to June 2010. All the patients having benefited from a artificial ventilation for a duration greater than 6 hours were included in this study. The studied parameters were: Socio-demographic (age, sex), diagnostic, therapeutic (indications, duration and complications of artificial ventilation), evolutionary. Results: Out of a total of 204 admissions during the study period, 81 patients received artificial ventilation, an incidence of artificial ventilation in the order of 39.7%. There were 49 men and 32 women. The ventilated patients had an average age of 43.9 years (range: 4 years and 85 years). Pathologies requiring artificial ventilation were neurological (46%) and traumatic (28%). Stroke was the leading medical condition (65%) while polytrauma was the major traumatic condition (65%). The most commonly used ventilatory modes were controlled volume ventilation (52.4%) and assisted ventilation (34.9%). The mean duration of artificial ventilation was 5.98 &#177; 3.73 days (range: 1 day and 21 days). The nosocomial pneumonia acquired under mechanical ventilation (PAVM) constituted 27% of the complications observed under artificial ventilation. The average length of ICU stay for all ventilated patients was 9.85 +/- 7.51 days (range: 1 day and 31 days). The lethality in our series was 80%. Patient age was the only prognostic factor associated with death (P = 0.003). Conclusion: The practice of artificial ventilation is still difficult in Ivory Coast and is at the origin of many complications such as nosocomial pneumonia acquired under mechanical ventilation which complicate the life threatening of the patients.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Artificial Ventilation</kwd><kwd> Resuscitation</kwd><kwd> Complications</kwd><kwd> Ivory Coast</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Artificial ventilation is one of the basic ICU techniques used to treat neurological and respiratory failures. It is estimated that 35% of patients admitted to intensive care units have artificial ventilation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84091-ref1">1</xref>] . Since 1950, many advances have been made in the field of artificial ventilation making its practice easy and unavoidable in many Western countries. In the United States, 790,000 patients per year benefit from artificial ventilation, representing 2.8% of all inpatients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84091-ref2">2</xref>] . In developing countries, and particularly in tropical environments, the practice of artificial ventilation remains difficult [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84091-ref3">3</xref>] . This is due to many problems related to: a shortage of equipment, a weakness of economic resources, scarcity of qualified personnel and a lack of suitable equipment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84091-ref3">3</xref>] . Despite all these difficulties, artificial ventilation remains an indispensable tool in the management of respiratory and neurological failures in intensive care units in tropical environments. Although artificial ventilation often saves lives, it can cause many complications that can be deleterious to patients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84091-ref4">4</xref>] . In Ivory Coast, data on the achievement of artificial ventilation in intensive care unit are rare. The purpose of this study was to describe the practice of artificial ventilation in the intensive care unit of the University Hospital of Treichville with a view to coming up with recommendations for its improvement.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Patients and Methods</title><p>This was a descriptive and prospective study conducted over a period of 9 months (April 2009 to June 2010) in the intensive care unit of the University Hospital of Treichville. The intensive care unit of the University Hospital of Treichville is the 3rd Resuscitation Department of the city of Abidjan. It has a capacity of eight beds each with a respirator to achieve a artificial ventilation. All patients placed on artificial ventilation for more than 6 hours regardless of age and artificial ventilation pattern were included in this study. Patients whose artificial ventilation duration was less than 6 hours, and those evacuated to another health facility before extubation were not excluded. Data collection was performed from a pre-established survey form. The parameters studied given were: socio-demographic data (age, sex), the main diagnosis, characteristics of artificial ventilation (indications, duration, complications, and duration), length of stay in intensive care and evolution. The different parameters studied were collected on a computer support (Excel 2000 and Systat 8.0 software). The statistical tests used were Khi2 for non-quantitative data and the Student’s test for quantitative data. A value of p &lt; 0.05 was selected as statistically significant.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>Of the 204 patients hospitalized during the study period, 81 had mechanical ventilation, or 39.7% of admitted patients. The sex ratio (male/female) was 1.38. The subjects aged between 30 and 44 years were the most likely to have had artificial ventilation (23.4%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). The mean age of ventilated patients was 43.98 &#177; 20.69 (range: 4 years and 85 years). The major medical history of the patients was high blood pressure (37%) and diabetes (16%). Respiratory history was observed in only 6% of patients. The conditions requiring artificial ventilation patients to be placed were mainly neurological (44.2%) and traumatic (28,5%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Stroke was the leading medical condition (65%) while polytrauma was the major traumatic condition (65%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The orotracheal intubation route was used in 68.3% of patients. Artificial ventilation was performed with sedation in 95% of subjects. In 69% of cases, sedation was performed with fentanyl-diazepam. The most commonly used ventilatory modes were controlled volume ventilation (52.4%) and assisted ventilation (34.9%). In 54% of cases, the duration of the artificial ventilation was between 1 and 5 days (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). The mean duration of artificial ventilation was 5.98 &#177; 3.73 days (range: 1 day to 21 days). Nosocomial pneumonia acquired with mechanical ventilation (27%) was the main complication observed in patients with artificial ventilation (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). The average length of ICU stay for all ventilated patients was 9.85 +/− 7.51 days (range: 1 day and 31 days). The lethality in our series was 80%. The poor prognostic factor associated with mortality was age (P = 0.003) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Studies of artificial ventilation in developing countries are few in number because of inadequate facilities for resuscitation and their frequent state of human and material deprivation. The incidence of artificial ventilation in our study was</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of Patients by Age (n = 81)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Age (year)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 14 year old</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 - 29 year old</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 - 44 year old</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >45 - 59 year old</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >60 - 74 year old</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;75 year old</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.4</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patients according to pathologies requiring artificial ventilation (n = 81)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Medical conditions</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Neurological pathologies</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Cerebrovascular accident</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Epilepsy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Meningoencephalitis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Eclampsia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Respiratory diseases</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Lung cancer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Infectieuses diseases</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Septic shock</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Severe malaria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Metabolic pathologies</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Diabetic ketoacidosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Toxic</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Organophosphorus poisoning</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Surgical pathologies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Number</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"   rowspan="2"  >Traumatic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Severe head trauma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Polytrauma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Other</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >postoperative cerebral anoxia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patients by duration of artificial ventilation (n = 81)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Duration (days)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 - 5 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 - 10 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 - 15 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;15 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patients broken down by the occurrence of complications (n = 81)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Complications</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nosocomial pneumonia acquired under mechanical ventilation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Obstruction of the intubation tube by a plug</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Accidental extubation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pneumothorax</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Atelectasis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No complications</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>39.7%. This incidence was higher than that observed in the Comoros (15.8%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84091-ref3">3</xref>] but similar to that found in the European studies (34% in the Sennef study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84091-ref5">5</xref>] and 41% in that of Blot [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84091-ref6">6</xref>] ). This impact could be explained by the efforts made by the Ivorian health authorities to provide the intensive care unit in Treichville</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patients according prognostic factors (n = 81)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Parameter</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Evolution</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >p</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Favorable</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Death</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >AGE</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;15 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >04</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >0.003</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;15 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Glasgow Score</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >0.247</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Duration of ventilation</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;5 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >0.136</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;5 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Hospital stay</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;7 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.145</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥7 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Pneumonia</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.067</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Types of pathologies</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Medical</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.260</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Traumatic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>with appropriate equipment to implement the artificial ventilation. Our study population was young with a mean age of 43.98 &#177; 20.69 years. This finding was different from that of Sennef et al., who reported older age groups over 60 years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84091-ref5">5</xref>] because of the prevalence of pathologies such as: congestive heart failure and acute decompensations of obstructive chronic pulmonary. Pathologies requiring artificial ventilation treatment were dominated by neurological conditions such as stroke (33%) and traumatic diseases (28%). The predominance of stroke is explained by the fact that hospitalized patients were usually adults (over 49% of our patients were older than 45). Age is a risk factor for the occurrence of events such as stroke, resulting in neurological disorders associated with respiratory distress, which often requires patients to be placed under artificial ventilation. The mean duration of artificial ventilation was 5.98 &#177; 3.73 days. This duration was superimposable to that observed by: Ndiaye et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84091-ref7">7</xref>] in Senegal (5.1 days), Seneff in the United States (4.7 days) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84091-ref5">5</xref>] , in a multicenter study performed in the West on 18,000 patients (6 days) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84091-ref8">8</xref>] . Artificial ventilation can cause many complications when it lasts more than 48 hours [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84091-ref9">9</xref>] . Several studies have shown that respiratory infections are the first complication in patients with prolonged ventilation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84091-ref10">10</xref>] . Nosocomial pneumonia acquired under mechanical ventilation constituted 27% of the complications observed in our patients. The literature evokes significantly higher figures (34%), under significantly better material conditions of hygiene [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84091-ref11">11</xref>] . In our context, this high incidence of the nosocomial pneumonia acquired under mechanical ventilation could be explained by technical difficulties (lack of filters, difficulties of bacteriological diagnosis) and human (low training of personnel to prevent and recognize nosocomial pneumonia acquired under mechanical ventilation). Mortality among ventilated patients in our series (80%) was higher than those observed in many studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84091-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84091-ref7">7</xref>] . This mortality was much lower than that observed by Stauffer et al. in Europe (33%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84091-ref12">12</xref>] . This could be explained on the one hand by the severity of the pathologies requiring artificial ventilation treatment of patients and on the other hand by our working conditions which was very different from that observed in many developed countries.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Limitations of the Study</title><p>The size of our study population and the fact that this work is done only within the Treichville University Hospital does not allow us to generalize the results of this preliminary study on artificial ventilation to all hospitals in Ivory Coast. However, the results of this study allow us to describe the practice of artificial ventilation in a developing country in tropical Africa and to stimulate discussion.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusion</title><p>Artificial ventilation is one of the fundamental techniques of resuscitation, the practice of which is still difficult in Ivory Coast. The realization artificial ventilation in our context is at the origin of many complications dominated by nosocomial pneumopathies acquired under ventilation which could be prevented by a strict respect of the rules of hospital hygiene and a reinforcement of the capacities of the caring personnel.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Declaration of Conflicts of Interest</title><p>Authors do not declare any conflicts of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Serge, I.B.G., D&#233;sir&#233;, A.P., Djohoui, N., Yaich, P., Kon&#233;, N., St&#233;phanie, K.K., Bernard, O., Edmond, A., Narcisse, B. and Yapo, B. (2018) Practical Artificial Ventilation in an African Tropical Environment: Experience of the Intensive Care Unit of the University Hospital of Treichville. Open Journal of Anesthesiology, 8, 123-129. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojanes.2018.84013</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.84091-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Esteban, A., Frutos-Vivar, F., Muriel, A., Ferguson, N.D., Pe&amp;ntilde;uelas, O., et al. (2013) Evolution of Mortality over Time in Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 188, 220-230.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201212-2169OC</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84091-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wunsch, H., Linde-Zwirble, W.T., Angus, D.C., Hartman, M.E. and Milbrandt, E.B. (2010) The Epidemiology of Mechanical Ventilation Use in the United States. Critical Care Medicine, 38, 1947-1953.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181ef4460</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84091-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Durasnel, P., Gallet De Santerre, P., Merzouki, D., Ridhoine, M., Charif, M., et al. (2005) Faut-il ventiler les patients de réanimation dans les pays en développement? Med Trop, 65, 537-542.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84091-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Slutsky, A.S. and Ranieri, V.M. (2013) Ventilator-induced Lung Injury. The New England Journal of Medicine, 369, 2126-2136.   
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1208707</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84091-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sennef Michael, G., Zimmerman Jack, E., Knaus William, A., Wagner Douglas, P., Draper Elisabeth, A., et al. (1996) Predicting Duration of Mechanical Ventilation: The Importance of disease And Patient Characteristics. Chest, 110, 469-479.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.110.2.469</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84091-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Blot</surname><given-names> F. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2003</year>)<article-title>Etude de l’intérêt de la trachéotomie précoce chez les malades sous ventilation mécanique prolongée</article-title><source> Revue des Maladies Respiratoires</source><volume> 20</volume>,<fpage> 411</fpage>-<lpage>420</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84091-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ndiaye, M., Wade, K., Niang, B., Kone/Mbodj, M., Mbow, C., et al. (2005) Pneumopathies acquises sous ventilation mécanique: Résultats d’une étude réalisée dans le service de réanimation de l’HPD. SRLF: Réanimation, 14, 118.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84091-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Esteban, A., Frutos, F., Tobin, M.J., Alia, I. and Solsona, J.F. (1995) A Comparison of Four Methods of Weaning Patients from Mechanical Ventilation. Spanich Lung Failure Collaborative Group. The New England Journal of Medicine, 332, 345-350.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199502093320601</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84091-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Craven, D.E., Barber, T.W., Sterger, K.A. and Montecalvo, M.A. (1990) Nosocomial Pneumonia in the 1990’s: Update of Epidemiology and Risk Factors. Seminars in Respiratory Infections, 5, 157-172.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84091-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brun-Buisson, C. (2000) Prévention des pneumopathies nosocomiales. Actualités en réanimation et urgence. SRLF Edition Elsevier, 41-55.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84091-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chastre, J. and Fagon, J.Y. (2002) Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 165, 867-872.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.165.7.2105078</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84091-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stauffer, J.L., Fayter, N.A., Graves, B., Cromb, M., Lynch, J.C., et al. (1993) Survival Following Mechanical Ventilation for Acute Respiratory Failure in Adult Men. Chest, 104, 1222-1229. &lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.104.4.1222</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>