<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">FNS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Food and Nutrition Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2157-944X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/fns.2018.94026</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">FNS-84031</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Whole Grain Gluten-Free High Protein Vegetable Snacks of Buckwheat Peanut Meal and Kale
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Talwinder</surname><given-names>S. Kahlon</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Roberto</surname><given-names>J. Avena-Bustillos</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mei-Chen</surname><given-names>M. Chiu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Western Regional Research Center, USDA-ARS, Albany, CA, USA</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>17</day><month>04</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>335</fpage><lpage>345</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>17,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2018</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>23,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2018</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>26,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2018</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Whole grain gluten-free high protein vegetable snacks were evaluated. The snacks were Buckwheat-Peanut Meal-Kale (BPK), BPK-Garlic, BPK-Onion and BPK-Ginger. Peanut meal was utilized to increase the protein content of these snacks as well as to add value to this agricultural byproduct. Snack dough was prepared using water nearly 1:1 as other as is ingredients. About 20 g of snack dough was placed on preheated KrumKake Express 839 Baker and cooked for 2 minutes. Sixty-nine in-house volunteers judged Color/Appearance and Texture/Mouth feel to be similar for the snacks tested. Taste/Flavor for BPK, BPK-Garlic and BPK-Onion snacks was similar and significantly higher (p ≤ 0.05) than for BPK-Ginger snacks. Odor/Aroma for BPK-Garlic snacks was significantly higher than for BPK-Ginger snacks. Acceptance for BPK and BPK-Garlic snacks was significantly higher than for BPK-Ginger snacks. Ex-pansion 3.6 - 4.2, porosity 0.72 - 0.75 and water activity 0.35 - 0.38 suggests that the snacks tested were light, crispy and have good anti-microbial stability. Acceptance was BPK and BPK-Garlic 94%, BPK-Onion 86% and BPK-Ginger 78%. These snacks contained only 3 - 4 ingredients and could be made in any house hold kitchen and/or in commercial production. Acceptance of 78% - 94% is very desirable. These whole grain gluten-free high protein vegetable healthy nutritious tasty snacks offer choice for all consumers, including individual’s sensitive to gluten.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Sensory Evaluation</kwd><kwd> Buckwheat</kwd><kwd> Kale</kwd><kwd> Peanut Meal</kwd><kwd> Gluten-Free</kwd><kwd>  Water Activity</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Snacks play an important role in between meals. In all family and public events snacks are trendy for consumption. Young individuals prefer snacks over regular meals. The snacks are expected to be healthful, flavorful, easy to carry and with very desirable taste [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84031-ref1">1</xref>] . For children, snacks are extremely essential in school and in after school programs. Serving healthy snacks is important in providing good nutrition, supporting lifelong healthy eating habits, and would help in preventing costly and potentially-disabling diseases, such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, high blood pressure, and obesity. Nutrition Policy and Promotion; Dietary Guidelines for Americans [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84031-ref2">2</xref>] recommends that, at least 1/2 of all the grains eaten should be whole grains. Average intakes of whole grains are far below recommended levels across all age-sex groups, and average intakes of refined grains are well above recommended limits for most age-sex groups. The Whole Grain Council [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84031-ref3">3</xref>] has documented that eating whole grains instead of refined grains lowers the risk of many chronic diseases. Helnaes et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84031-ref4">4</xref>] reported that higher intake of whole grain rye and oats and not that of wheat was related to lower risk of heart disease in men and women. Wheat is the main grain of many snack products, however there is increasing evidence of hyper-sensitivity to gluten in the celiac patients. Hypersensitivity to gluten results in eroding of the lining of small intestines [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84031-ref5">5</xref>] . It results in delayed growth and many serious health problems. Healthy intestinal lining is required to absorb the needed nutrients. Food and Drug Administration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84031-ref6">6</xref>] defines “gluten-free” with less than 20 parts per million, gluten. This is the level that can be validly tested and can be tolerated by most gluten sensitive individual. Hypersensitivity to gluten has been increasing worldwide. Some of the potential reasons could be use of microbial transaminase enzyme as animal protein glue to produce meat patties from meat scraps. Transamination of gluten could make it hypersensitive. Another reason could be that pollution and toxic environment has altered gut microbiome resulting in loss of gluten immunity. If one family member is gluten sensitive, the whole family must consume gluten-free foods. Snacks made of gluten-free whole grains would be desirable. Snacks available in US are essentially unhealthy and are low protein and low in complex carbohydrates and high in salt. Since most individuals and especially children and seniors do not meet the recommended intake of whole grains, green leafy vegetables and protein [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84031-ref7">7</xref>] . The development of whole grain gluten-free, high protein, vegetable snacks would help to meet such a need. Consumers need to be educated to desire healthy home cooking or health promoting commercially produced foods and snacks. There is a need to develop gluten-free whole grain nutritious tasty snacks. Such snacks could include health promoting spices as well.</p><p>Buckwheat is a pseudocereal, a low input crop with relatively high yields that can be grown in marginal lands. Its grain has unique triangular shape with size like wheat kernels. It contains no gluten that makes it suitable substitute grains for people who are sensitive to wheat or other grains that contain protein glutens. Top buckwheat production in thousand tons is Russia, 700; China, 662; Ukraine, 176; France, 111; US and Poland, 83 each [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84031-ref8">8</xref>] . One cup 155 g of buckwheat provides RDI of manganese 34%, copper 28%, magnesium 21%, dietary fiber 18% and phosphorus 17%.</p><p>Top peanut producing countries in million metric tons are China, 13.4; India, 7.7; United States, 1.9; Nigeria, 1.5; Indonesia, 1.1; Myanmar, 0.7; Chad and Senegal, 0.5 each; Ghana and Argentina, 0.4 each [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84031-ref8">8</xref>] . Peanuts produced in the U.S. are mostly used in food and confection products, but more than 50 percent of the world production is crushed for its oil. World production of peanuts is 30.5 million metric tons per year. Nearly 15 million tons of peanuts are used to extract oil resulting in 7.5 million tons of peanut meal. Peanut meal is low value byproduct mainly used as animal feed. This agricultural byproduct could be used to make high protein nutritious foods and snacks resulting in significant value addition to peanut growers.</p><p>Curly Kale is popular cruciferous green leafy vegetable rich in lutein, sulforaphhane, various flavonoids and polyphenols [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84031-ref9">9</xref>] . Steam cooked kale retains more of its nutrients and binds significantly more bile acids than raw [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84031-ref10">10</xref>] . Binding bile acids results in reduced fat absorption with potential to lower cholesterol. Sulphoraphane has been associated with reducing the risk of cancer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84031-ref11">11</xref>] . A single cup of kale (67 g) provides RDA of vitamin C 134%, vitamin A 206% and vitamin K 684%.</p><p>Garlic (Allium sativum) is a widely used spice. In 2014 world production of garlic was 25 million tons. Top garlic producers in million tons are: China, 20.0; India, 1.25; South Korea, 0.35; Egypt and Russia 0.26 each [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84031-ref8">8</xref>] . Sharp flavor and taste of garlic is due to allicin, a sulfur containing compound. Garlic contains several phytonutrients with potential health benefits [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84031-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84031-ref13">13</xref>] .</p><p>Onion (Allium cepa), is a vegetable and is most widely cultivated spice. World production of onion in 2014 was 88.5 million tons. Top producers in million tons are: China 22.5; India, 19.4; USA, 3.2; Egypt 2.5; Iran, 2.1 and Russia 2.0 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84031-ref8">8</xref>] . Phytonutrients and polyphenols of onion have health promoting potential [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84031-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>Ginger (Zingiber officinale), is a common spice used in various cuisines and have been associated with various health benefits. Thomson et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84031-ref15">15</xref>] reported that ginger could be used as a cholesterol-lowering, antithrombotic and anti-inflammatory agent. Addition of 4% ginger prevented the effect of hypertension inducing drug in rats [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84031-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84031-ref17">17</xref>] .</p><p>These snacks would be whole grain, gluten-free, high protein, vegetable, low in salt and calories and could be prepared in any home and/or by commercial food companies. In the study reported herein, sixty-nine in house volunteers evaluated four kinds of snacks containing gluten-free ancient whole grain Buckwheat (B), Peanut meal (P) and Kale (K). The snacks were BPK, BPK-Garlic, BPK-Onion and BPK-Ginger.</p><p>Practical Application: Ancient whole grain gluten-free Buckwheat, high protein Peanut meal and vegetable snacks were developed. Acceptance of Buckwheat-Peanut Meal-Kale (BPK) and BKP-Garlic snacks was 94%, BPK-Onion 86% and BKP-Ginger 78%. These snacks were 25% protein, 3.6 - 4.2 expansion and 72% - 75% porosity. These snacks could be made in any house hold and/or commercial production. These healthy nutritious tasty snacks offer choice for all consumers, including individual’s sensitive to gluten.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>Whole grain buckwheat, raw peanuts, curly kale (fresh), dry powder (garlic, onion and ginger) were obtained from local grocery markets. Buckwheat flour was prepared by using Blendtec Kitchen Mill Model 91 at medium setting (Blendtec Inc., Wichita, Kansas, USA). Peanut meal was obtained by extracting oil using Vevor Oil Press (Joyfay.com, Cleveland, Ohio, USA). Kale was chopped using Mini-Prep Processor (Cuisinart.com, East Windsor, New Jersey, USA).</p><p>Ingredients and snacks were analyzed for nitrogen using AOAC method 990.03 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84031-ref18">18</xref>] by Leco FP628 analyzer (LecoCorporation, StJoseph, MI, USA); crude fat with petroleum ether by accelerated solvent extractor (ASE350, Dionex Corp., Sunnyvale, CA, USA); ash, using AOAC method 942.05 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84031-ref19">19</xref>] ; and moisture, using AOAC method 935.29 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84031-ref19">19</xref>] . Composition of buckwheat flour, peanut meal and kale is given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>Dough Composition of Ancient Whole Grain Buckwheat (B), Peanut Meal (P) and Kale (K) Snacks is given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><p>The snacks contained 23% - 24% Buckwheat, 23% - 24% Peanut Meal, 46% -48%</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Composition of buckwheat, peanut meal and kale, dry matter basis %</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ingredients</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Protein</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fat</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Minerals</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Carbohydrates</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >DM</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Buckwheat</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.30 &#177; 0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.33 &#177; 0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.97 &#177; 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.81 &#177; 0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.41 &#177; 0.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Peanut meal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.69 &#177; 0.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.96 &#177; 0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.94 &#177; 0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.31 &#177; 0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.90 &#177; 0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kale</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.01 &#177; 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.90 &#177; 0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.88 &#177; 0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.00 &#177; 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.79 &#177; 0.07</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Nitrogen to protein factors used was 6.25. Dry matter, DM. Carbohydrate = [Dry matter − (Protein + Fat + Ash)]. Samples were analyzed in triplicates. Values are mean &#177; SEM.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Dough composition of ancient whole grain gluten-free buckwheat (B), peanut meal (P) and kale (K) snacks, as is basis %</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Snack</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >B</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >p</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >k</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Oil</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Salt</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Garlic</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Onion</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ginger</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Water</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100 ml</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BPK-Garlic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120 ml</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BPK-Onion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120 ml</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BPK-Ginger</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120 ml</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Level of Garlic, Onion and Ginger was decided by consensus of laboratory personnel.</p><p>fresh Curly Kale, 3% - 4% Peanut Oil, 1.1% - 1.2% salt. Garlic snacks contained 4% dry Garlic powder and Onion and Ginger snacks contained 2.7% dry Onion or Ginger powder. Snacks dough was prepared by adding 100 - 120 mL water to 100 g of as is ingredients. Dough was set at room temperature for 30 min. The levels of garlic, onion and ginger were decided by the consensus of laboratory personnel. Snacks were cooked in a 1050-Watt, Chef’s Choice KrumKake Express 839 (Edge Craft Corporation, Avondale, PA, USA). KrumKake Express with heat control dial settings 1-6 was heated at setting 4 till green ready light turned on. Baking temperature ranged from185˚C - 208˚C as measured by Anritsu Meter AP-710 (Anritsumeter Co., Tokyo, Japan). Cooking surface was lightly greased and 20 g snack dough was placed on the center of heated KrumKake Express baker and cooked for 2 min. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows four kinds of gluten-free ancient whole grain Buckwheat-Peanut Meal-Kale cooked snacks. Cooked snacks were cooled to room temperature then vacuum heat sealed in plastic bags by Food Saver 2200 Series (Foodsaver.com, Boca Raton, FL, USA).</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Sensory Evaluation of Snacks</title><p>Vacuum packed cooked snacks were opened and cut into four pieces with a pizza cutter. All four kinds of snacks were placed in an eight inch by ten-inch plate labeled Buckwheat-Peanut Meal-Kale (BPK), BPK-Garlic, BPK-Onion, BPK-Ginger <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. Sixty-nine in-house volunteers tasted the snacks in four</p><p>sensory evaluation booths under white light for Color/Appearance, Odor/Aroma, Taste/Flavor, Texture/Mouth-feel and Acceptance. Snacks were evaluated individually and not for relative rating. The sensory parameters were evaluated on a scale of 1 - 5 (Like very much = 5, like slightly = 4, neutral = 3, dislike slightly = 2 and dislike very much = 1); Acceptance was evaluated on a scale of 1 - 2 (Acceptable = 2 and unacceptable = 1).</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Water Activity</title><p>Water activity (Aw) of Buckwheat-Peanut Meal-Kale gluten-free whole grains snacks were measured at 25.01˚C &#177; 0.02˚C in triplicate using an Aqua Lab 4TE dew point water activity meter (Decagon Devices, Inc., Pullman, WA, USA).</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Density</title><p>The bulk density (ρb) of BPK gluten-free whole grain snacks was measured by Ottawa Sand volume displacement of 10 g sample in triplicate after shaking in a jar of 202 CC volume. The first reading was taken after shaking for 15 min., subsequent two readings were taken after additional shaking for 5 min each time. True density (ρt) was determined five times using gas displacement pycnometer AccuPycII1340 (Micromeritics Instrument Co., Norcross, GA, USA) at 21.4˚C &#177; 0.4˚C. Samples of each snack were dried in triplicate at room temperature for 15 hr at 0% relative humidity in a vacuum desiccator with anhydrous calcium sulfate (W.A. Hammond Drierite, Xenia, OH, USA). After drying, small pieces of samples were compressed into a density measuring cylinder of the pycnometer and five true density values were recorded.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Statistical Analysis</title><p>Data were analyzed with Mini tab software (version14.12.0, Minitab inc., State College, PA, USA) using one-way analysis of variance and Tuckey’s multiple comparison tests with (p ≤ 0.05) was considered the criterion of significance.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results and Discussion</title><p>Color/Appearance and Texture/Mouth feel of Buckwheat-Peanut Meal-Kale (BPK), BPK-Garlic, BPK-Onion and BPK-Ginger were judged to be similar by sensory evaluation by 69 in-house volunteer tasters (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><p>Odor/Aroma for BPK-Garlic snacks was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) better than that for BPK-Ginger snacks. Taste/Flavor for BPK, BPK-Garlic and BPK-Onion snacks were similar and significantly higher than for BPK-Ginger snacks. Data suggests that Taste/Flavor of BPK, BPK-Garlic and BPK-Onion snacks was preferred compared with BPK-Ginger snacks. Acceptance of BPK-Onion snacks was similar to the other three kinds of snacks tested. Acceptance for BPK and BPK-Garlic snacks was similar and significantly higher than BPK-Ginger snacks.</p><p>Desirability index for sensory parameters was calculated as percent of tasters judged [like very much + like slightly + 1/2 (neutral)] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84031-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84031-ref21">21</xref>] . Desirability index for BPK, BPK-Garlic, BPK-Onion and BPK-Ginger snacks for Color/Appearance 85%, 84%, 76% and 79%; Odor/Aroma 81%, 83%, 79% and 72%; Taste/Flavor 86%, 78%, 80% and 59%; Texture/Mouth feel 96%, 95%, 96% and 93%, respectively. Desirability index for the ancient whole grain, gluten-free, high protein, vegetable, snacks values ranged from 72% - 96% that would be considered very encouraging, except for BPK-Ginger snacks with Taste/Flavor value was only 59%. Data suggest that ginger flavor was less favored.</p><p>Percent acceptance of ancient whole grain gluten-free Buckwheat-Peanut Meal-Kale snacks is given in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. Acceptance of BPK and BPK-Garlic snacks was similar and significantly higher than BPK-Ginger snacks. Percent acceptance values ranged from 78% - 94%. Acceptance values for the whole grain gluten-free high protein vegetable snacks tested were very desirable.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Results of taste panel of Buckwheat-Peanut Meal-Kale (BPK) whole grain, gluten-free, high protein vegetable snacks<sup>ab</sup></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Snack</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Color Appearance</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Odor Aroma</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Taste Flavor</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Texture Mouth feel</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Acceptance</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.98 &#177; 0.10a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.78 &#177; 0.10ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.96 &#177; 0.10a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.42 &#177; 0.08a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.94 &#177; 0.03a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BPK-Garlic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.83 &#177; 0.11a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.90 &#177; 0.10a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.03 &#177; 0.14a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.38 &#177; 0.08a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.94 &#177; 0.03a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BPK-Onion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.75 &#177; 0.11a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.78 &#177; 0.10ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.99 &#177; 0.13a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.39 &#177; 0.09a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.86 &#177; 0.04ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BPK-Ginger</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.78 &#177; 0.11a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.58 &#177; 0.09b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.30 &#177; 0.14b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.28 &#177; 0.08a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.78 &#177; 0.05b</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>a</sup>Values (mean &#177; SEM) within columns with different letters differ significantly (p ≤ 0.05), n = 69. <sup>b</sup>Sensory evaluation parameters were on a scale of 1 - 5 (Like very much = 5, like slightly = 4, neutral = 3, dislike slightly = 2 and dislike very much = 1); Acceptance was on scale of 1 - 2 (Acceptable = 2 and unacceptable = 1).</p><p>Water activity of BPK and BPK-Onion snacks was significantly lower than that for BPK-Garlic and BPK-Ginger snacks (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). Relative water activity of the snacks tested was BPK-Ginger = BPK-Garlic &gt; BPK = BPK-Onion. Water activity values ranged from 0.35 - 0.38. Data suggest that BPK and BPK-Onion snacks were crunchier with higher antimicrobial stability. Carrots snacks with Aw of 0.44 were reported to have desired crispness and antimicrobial stability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84031-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.84031-ref23">23</xref>] .</p><p>True density (ρt) values for the whole grain, high protein vegetable snacks tested ranged from 1.35 - 1.37. Differences among snacks tested were BPK-Onion &gt; BPK = BPK-Garlic &gt; BPK-Ginger. Bulk density (ρb) values for BPK, BPK-Onion and BPK-Ginger were similar and significantly higher than BPK-Garlic snacks. Porosity of BPK-Garlic snacks was significantly higher than BPK, BPK-Onion and BPK-ginger snacks. Expansion of BPK-Garlic snacks was significantly higher than the other snacks tested. Expansion values for BPK-Onion snacks were also significantly higher than BPK and BPK-Ginger snacks. Expansion values were BPK-Garlic &gt; BPK-Onion &gt; BPK = BPK-Ginger. Expansion values ranged from 3.6 to 4.2 with high 72% - 75% porosity suggests that these snacks quite light and brittle and would be quite filling and would give desirable presentation in their packaging.</p><p>Composition of ancient whole grain, gluten-free, high protein, vegetable snacks is given in (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). The protein content of the formulated snacks ranged from 25% - 29%. The aim was to achieve 25% protein snacks and add value to peanut meal. This object was clearly achieved. The peanut oil extracted by compressors without the use of organic chemicals would be desirable with higher market price. Food grade peanut meal with its use in high protein healthy snacks would add value to this farm byproduct. Most common snacks on the market are high salt with only 2% - 10% protein. The fat content of these snacks</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Water activity (Aw), true density (ρt), bulk density (ρb), porosity and expansion of Buckwheat-Peanut Meal-Kale (BPK) whole grain, gluten-free, high protein snacks</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Snack</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Aw</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ρt</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ρb</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Porosity</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Expansion</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35 &#177; 0.10b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.36 &#177; 0.01b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.38 &#177; 0.10a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.72 &#177; 0.01b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6 &#177; 0.03c</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BPK-Garlic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.37 &#177; 0.11a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.36 &#177; 0.01b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.33 &#177; 0.14b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75 &#177; 0.01a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.2 &#177; 0.03a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BPK-Onion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35 &#177; 0.11b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.37 &#177; 0.01a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.37 &#177; 0.13a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.73 &#177; 0.01b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8 &#177; 0.04b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BPK-Ginger</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.38 &#177; 0.11a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.35 &#177; 0.01c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.37 &#177; 0.14a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.72 &#177; 0.01b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6 &#177; 0.05c</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Values (mean &#177; SEM) within columns with different letters differ significantly (p ≤ 0.05), n = 69. Water activity (Aw) was measured (N = 3) at 25.01˚C &#177; 0.02˚C by AquaLab dew point water activity meter 4TE (Decagon Devices, Inc., Pullman, WA). True density (ρt) was determined (N = 5) by AccPyc II 1340 gas pycnometer (Micromeritics Instrument Co., Norcross, GA) at 21.4˚C &#177; 0.4˚C. The bulk density (ρb) of each sample was measured (N = 3) by Ottawa Sand volume displacement by about 10 g of sample in triplicate after 15-5-5 minutes shaking in a jar of 202 cc volume. Porosity was calculated using the equation [Porosity = 1 - (ρb/ρt)]. Expansion was calculated using the equation [Expansion = (ρt/ρb)].</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Composition of Buckwheat-Peanut Meal-Kale (BPK) whole grain, gluten-free, high protein snacks</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Snack</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Protein</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fat</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Minerals</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Carbohydrates</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >DM</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BPK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.67 &#177; 1.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.93 &#177; 0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.12 &#177; 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.34 &#177; 0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BPK-Garlic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.37 &#177; 0.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.77 &#177; 0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.06 &#177; 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.34 &#177; 0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BPK-Onion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.96 &#177; 1.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.08 &#177; 0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.15 &#177; 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.12 &#177; 0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BPK-Ginger</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.53 &#177; 1.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.09 &#177; 0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.13 &#177; 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.69 &#177; 0.02</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Nitrogen to protein factors used was 6.25. Dry matter, DM. Carbohydrate = [Dry Matter − (Protein + Fat + Ash)]. Samples were analyzed in triplicates. Values are mean &#177; SEM, (n = 3).</p><p>ranged 14% - 16%. In the subsequent snack formulations effort would be made to even lower their fat content while maintaining the desirable sensory parameters. Mineral content of the four kinds of snacks tested ranged from 6.06% - 6.15%. Since these snacks contained only 1.1% - 1.2% salt. These snacks would be considered low sodium and good source of other essential minerals.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>Four kinds of ancient whole grain gluten-free high protein vegetable snacks were evaluated by sixty-nine in-house volunteers. The object was successfully attained to formulate 25% protein gluten-free whole grain vegetable snacks. Protein content of the snacks tested ranged from 25% - 29%. It has added value to peanut meal a farm byproduct mainly used as animal feed. Acceptance of Buckwheat-Peanut Meal-Kale (BPK) and BKP-Garlic snacks was 94%, BPK-Onion 86% and BKP-Ginger 78%. These acceptance values are very desirable. These snacks are formulated using only 3 - 4 ingredients and could be made in any house hold on counter top appliances and in commercial productions. The water activity of these snacks ranged 0.35 - 0.38 suggesting that the snacks were crispy with good antimicrobial stability. Expansion of the cooked snacks was 3.6 - 4.2 with high 72% - 75% porosity suggesting that these snacks would light and brittle and would be quite filling with desirable presentation in commercial packaging. These whole grain gluten-free high protein vegetable healthy nutritious tasty snacks offer choice for all consumers, including individual’s sensitive to gluten.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors sincerely thank all the sensory evaluators of this study.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflict of Interest Declaration</title><p>All the authors of this manuscript have no conflict of interest with its contents or statements.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Kahlon, T.S., Avena-Bustillos, R.J. and Chiu, M.-C.M. (2018) Whole Grain Gluten-Free High Protein Vegetable Snacks of Buckwheat Peanut Meal and Kale. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 9, 335-345. https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2018.94026</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.84031-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Prepared Foods (2016) http://www.preparedfoods.com/articles/118054</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84031-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">USDA (2015) Nutrition Policy and Promotion; Dietary Guidelines for Americans.  
http://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015/guidelines/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84031-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Whole Grain Council (2009) http://www.wholegrainscouncil.org/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84031-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Halnaes, A., Kyro, C., Anderson, I., Lacoppidan, S., Overvad, K., Christensen, J., Tjonneland, A. and Olsen, A. (2016) Intake of Whole Grains Is Associated with Lower Risk of Myocardial Infarction: The Danish Diet, Cancer and Health Cohort. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 103, 999-1007.  
https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.115.124271</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84031-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lebwohl, B., Ludvigsson, J.F. and Green, P.H. (2015) Celiac Disease and Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity. BMJ (Review), 351, h4347.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84031-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Food and Drug Administration Defines Gluten-Free (2014).  
https://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm363069.htm</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84031-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mother-Jones (2017) No, Feeding Hungry Kids and Seniors Isn’t a Waste of Money.  
www.motherjones.com/politics/2017/03/trump-budget-school-meals-on-wheels/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84031-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">UN Food &amp; Agriculture (FAO) (2014) Production of Crops by Countries.  
http://www.fao.org/traditional-crops/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84031-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Angeloni, C., Leoncini, E., Malaguti, M., Angelini, S., Hrelia, P. and Hrelia, S. (2009) Modulation of Phase II Enzymes by Sulforaphane: Implications for Its Cardioprotective Potential. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 57, 615-622.  
https://doi.org/10.1021/jf900549c</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84031-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kahlon, T.S., Chiu, M.M. and Chapman, M.H. (2008) Steam Cooking Significantly Improves in vitro Bile Acid Binding of Collard Greens, Kale, Mustard Greens, Broccoli, Green Bell Pepper, and Cabbage. Nutrition Research, 28, 351-357.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2008.03.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84031-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Amjad, A.I., Parikh, R.A., Appleman, L.J., Hahm, E.R., Singh, K. and Singh, S.V. (2015) Broccoli-Derived Sulforaphane and Chemoprevention of Prostate Cancer: from Bench to Bedside. Current Pharmacology Reports, 1, 382-390.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40495-015-0034-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84031-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Rahman</surname><given-names> K. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2007</year>)<article-title>Effects of Garlic on Platelet Biochemistry and Physiology</article-title><source> Molecular Nutrition &amp; Food Research</source><volume> 51</volume>,<fpage> 1335</fpage>-<lpage>1344</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84031-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guercio, V., Turati, F., La Vecchia, C., Galeone, C. and Tavani, A. (2016) Allium Vegetables and Upper Aerodigestive Tract Cancers: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Molecular Nutrition &amp; Food Research, 60, 212-222.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201500587</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84031-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Slimestad, R., Fossen, T. and V&amp;#229;gen, I.M. (2007) Onions: A Source of Unique Dietary Flavonoids. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 55, 10067-10080.  
https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0712503</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84031-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thomson, M., Al-Qattan, K.K., Al-Sawan, S.M., Alnaqeeb, M.A., Khan, I. and Ali, M. (2002) The Use of Ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) as a Potential Anti-Inflammatory and Antithrombotic Agent. Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids, 67, 475-478. https://doi.org/10.1054/plef.2002.0441</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84031-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Akinyemi, A.J., Thomé, G.R., Morsch, V.M., Bottari, N.B., Baldissarelli, J., Oliveira, L.S., Goularte, J.F., Belló-Klein, A., Oboh, G. and Schetinger, M.R. (2016) Dietary Supplementation of Ginger and Turmeric Rhizomes Modulates Platelets Ectonucleotidase and Adenosine Deaminase Activities in Normotensive and Hypertensive Rats. Phytotherapy Research, 30, 1156-1163. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.5621</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84031-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ahmad, B., Rehman, M.U., Insha, A., Arif, A., Rasool, S., Bhat, S.A., Insha, A.I., Ishraq, H.I., Bilal, S. and Mir, M.U. (2015) A Review on Pharmacological Properties of Zingerone (4-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-2-butanone). The Scientific World Journal, 2015, Article ID: 816364. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/816364</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84031-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">AOAC (2000) Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 17th Edition, The Association, Arlington.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84031-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">AOAC (1990) Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 15th Edition, The Association, Arlington.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84031-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kahlon, T.S., Milczarek, R.R. and Chiu, M.M. (2013) Whole Grain Gluten-Free Egg-Free Pasta. Cereal Foods World, 58, 4-7.  
https://doi.org/10.1094/CFW-58-1-0004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84031-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kahlon, T.S., Milczarek, R.R. and Chiu, M.M. (2013) Whole Grain Gluten-Free Egg-Free High Protein Pasta. Vegetos, 26, 65-71.  
https://doi.org/10.5958/j.2229-4473.26.2.055</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84031-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adams, M.R. and Moss, M.O. (1997) Food Microbiology. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.84031-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dueik, V., Marzullo, C. and Bouchon, P. (2013) Effect of Vacuum Inclusion on the Quality and the Sensory Attributes of Carrot Snacks. Food Science and Technology, 50, 361-365.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>