<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Geology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-7570</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojg.2018.84022</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJG-83743</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Whole-Rock Geochemistry of Host Rocks and K/Ar Age of Hydrothermal Mineral of the Co-O Epithermal Gold Deposit, Mindanao, Philippines
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kristine</surname><given-names>Joy L. Taguibao</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ryohei</surname><given-names>Takahashi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Graduate School of International Resource Sciences, Akita University, Akita City, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Graduate School of Engineering and Resource Sciences, Akita University, Akita City, Japan</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>ktaguibao@gmail.com(KJLT)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>13</day><month>04</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>383</fpage><lpage>398</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>8,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2018</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>10,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2018</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>13,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2018</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial International License (CC BY-NC).http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Whole-rock chemical composition of host rocks and recently acquired K/Ar age of hydrothermal mineral of the Co-O epithermal gold deposit in Mindanao Island of the Philippines are herein reported. Located along a Pliocene-Quaternary calc-alkaline magmatic zone at eastern Mindanao region, the Co-O gold deposit is of intermediate sulfidation epithermal Au (+Ag &#177; Cu &#177; Pb &#177; Zn) quartz vein type. Geological units in the area are probable Eocene to Oligocene basaltic-andesitic to andesitic volcanic flows and volcaniclastic rocks, Oligocene andesitic to dioritic stocks and dikes, a diatreme-maar complex, and an overlying sedimentary sequence. The mineralized quartz &#177; calcite veins are mainly hosted in the intrusive rocks and surrounding volcanic rocks that are hydrothermally altered generally to K-feldspar, chlorite and other clay minerals. Discrimination diagram using immobile elements such as Zr/TiO
  <sub>2</sub> vs. Nb/Y indicates that these rocks belong to sub-alkaline andesite and basaltic-andesite to basalt and alkali basalt in composition. The volcanic rocks plot in the island arc tholeiite and calc-alkaline fields of generally basaltic andesite and andesite composition, with a few in basalt and dacite. In the “alteration box plot”, the samples mostly plot within the least altered intermediate volcanic host rocks in the hydrothermal alteration field. Plots of each rock unit show a general chlorite-carbonate (-pyrite) alteration trend, with plots of volcanic rocks more dispersed and a few fallen outside the least altered box. K/Ar dating of hydrothermal minerals from the andesite porphyry and polymictic diatreme breccia samples yielded ages of 28.6 &#177; 0.9 Ma (Late Oligocene) and 31.7 &#177; 1.9 Ma (Early Oligocene), respectively. Age dating of these hydrothermally formed minerals gives the age of the hydrothermal activity associated with the mineralization. This suggests that the hydrothermal activity associated with the Co-O epithermal vein system transpired immediately after or during the Oligocene magmatism in a tectonic setting that produced island arc tholeiitic to calc-alkaline magmas, prior to drifting to its present location and accretion with the central and western parts of the Mindanao Island; in contrast to more prominent Miocene and Pliocene to Pleistocene mineralization ages along the Philippine archipelago.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Epithermal Gold Deposit</kwd><kwd> Co-O Deposit</kwd><kwd> Hydrothermal Alteration</kwd><kwd> K-Ar Age Dating</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>In the southernmost main island of the Philippines (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>), the Co-O mine sits in the Central Pacific Cordillera of the Eastern Mindanao Province (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). This region is saddled between the North Pacific Cordillera to the north and the South Pacific Cordillera to the south. Structural features separating these regions of the north-south trending cordillera are the Lianga Fault and Cateel Bay Fault. These regional structures including the Mati Fault to the south constitute the southern horsetail structure of the left-lateral strike-slip Philippine Fault that runs along the entire stretch of the Philippine archipelago [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83743-ref1">1</xref>] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>The Co-O gold underground mine is currently being operated by the Philsaga Mining Corp., which is a Philippine subsidiary of the Medusa Mining Ltd. As described in earlier consultancy works and company surveys, the Co-O deposit is characterized as an intermediate sulfidation epithermal gold (+Ag &#177; Cu &#177; Pb &#177; Zn) quartz vein type (e.g., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83743-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83743-ref3">3</xref>] ). The Co-O mine was first developed in the late 1980s and has since then been currently developed to about 350 meters below the adit level (Level 1) that is at 150 meters above mean sea level. East-west length of underground workings reaches to about 1000 meters per level. The reported reserve of the Co-O mine for mid-2017 is 1.64 M tonnes at 6.54 g/t for 345,000 ounces of gold [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83743-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>With a purpose to reconstruct the tectonic history of the Co-O epithermal gold deposit and vicinity, this paper presents the results of recently conducted whole-rock geochemical analyses on the basis of X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectroscopy and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and K/Ar dating of selected representative samples of host rocks of the Co-O epithermal gold vein deposit.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Regional Setting</title><p>As in earlier works (e.g., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83743-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83743-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83743-ref7">7</xref>] ), the Philippine archipelago has been generally described as an amalgamation of magmatic rocks, ophiolitic suites,</p><p>sedimentary basins and metamorphic units that are grouped into two distinct tectono-stratigraphic terranes, namely: Philippine Mobile Belt (PMB) and Palawan-Mindoro Continental Block (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The ophiolitic and metamorphic rocks constitute the pre-Tertiary basement of the Philippine archipelago [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83743-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>The Philippine Mobile Belt is an active deformation zone between the Philippine Sea Plate to the east and the eastern margin of the Eurasian Plate to the west. It comprises majority of the whole length of the Philippine archipelago, from the whole Luzon island to most parts of the Visayas and Mindanao islands.</p><p>It is bounded on both sides by subduction zones of opposing polarities and traversed by the ~1200-km left-lateral strike slip Philippine Fault System (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Tectonically separated from the PMB is the Palawan-Mindoro Continental Block at the western side of the archipelago. This block is believed to have been rifted from mainland Asia and drifted to its present position as it collided with the PMB (e.g., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83743-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83743-ref5">5</xref>] ).</p><p>Previous works on the eastern Mindanao Island are mainly focused on the Surigao and/or Masara District including other areas of the island and southern offshore regions with implications on the island’s tectonic history (e.g., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83743-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83743-ref12">12</xref>] ). According to these studies, the pre-Miocene geological units of Eastern Mindanao were formed in southern latitudes and have moved towards the northwest until it collided with the pre-Miocene units of the Western Mindanao that were derived from the eastern Eurasian margin generally of continental affinity. Studies on the reconstruction of paleo-latitudes using onshore and offshore paleomagnetic declinations (e.g., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83743-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83743-ref14">14</xref>] ) reveal that the Eastern Mindanao during Oligocene (30 Ma) was located at 10˚S latitude, where a northeast-dipping subduction system was forming most of the Eastern Mindanao arc units.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Deposit Geology</title><p>Main lithologies associated with the Co-O gold deposit are volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks intruded by diorite, dacite and andesite porphyries, all in turn cut and overlain by a diatreme-maar complex typified by polymictic volcanic breccias (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p><p>These units are composed of typical mineral assemblages of volcanic and intrusive rocks of basalt-andesitic to andesitic composition. The porphyritic andesitic to basaltic-andesitic volcanic rocks consist of phenocrysts mainly of plagioclase partly altered to K-feldspar, calcite and/or clay (smectite, interstratified illite-smectite, chlorite &#177; kaolinite; confirmed through X-ray diffractometry), with subordinate hornblende and/or clinopyroxene altered into chlorite, and quartz, set in a microcrystalline groundmass. Intrusive andesite porphyries include similar assemblage and alteration minerals, with some containing xenoliths of porphyritic andesite. These rocks exhibit similar alteration assemblage to</p><p>those of the volcanic rocks but of higher degree of alteration. Pyrite, ilmenite, and chalcopyrite are found in the volcanic rocks, while hematite, magnetite, pyrite, chalcopyrite and ilmenite are in the intrusive rocks. In both units, quartz &#177; calcite veins/veinlets are present. Polymictic diatreme volcanic breccias, as defined by the Philsaga Mining Corporation (unpublished internal report), generally contain clasts of the abovementioned units with detrital grains of quartz and feldspars set in a fine-grained (flour) or patches of quartzofeldspathic, calcitic, and chloritic minerals as matrix.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Whole-Rock Geochemistry of Volcanic Rocks</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Field Sampling and Analytical Methods</title><p>Samples that were used for the analyses were mainly obtained from the Co-O underground mine and drill cores generally at depths 150 to 200 meters below sea level. Since all of the lithologic units are hydrothermally altered within the deposit area, the least altered samples were selected for the geochemical analyses.</p><p>Whole-rock major element compositions of representative samples of host rocks obtained from the underground mine workings and drill cores were measured using an in-house Rigaku ZSX Primus II X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometer in the Faculty of International Resource Sciences at Akita University. One set of powdered samples contained in ceramic crucibles was dried to 110˚C and heated to 900˚C in a Yamato DX 400 drying oven to obtain the loss on ignition (LOI) value of each sample. Another set of the powdered samples was prepared into pressed pellets in polyvinyl chloride (PVC) rings using a press machine and flat type dies. This set of samples was analyzed using the XRF spectrometer with fundamental parameter (FP) method combined with empirical method. The results were normalized to 100 wt% total after adding the LOI values determined separately. Whole-rock trace element concentration of the host rocks were measured using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometer (ICP-MS) outsourced to ALS laboratory in Brisbane, Australia.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Major and Trace Element Composition of Host Rocks</title><p>Results of whole-rock geochemical investigation on the basis of measurements by XRF and ICP-MS (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) of host rocks of the Co-O epithermal gold deposit indicate that these rocks belong to an island arc tholeiitic to calc-alkaline magma series of mainly sub-alkaline andesite and basaltic-andesite to basalt and alkali basalt in composition (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>).</p><p>Since all of the units associated with the Co-O deposit are hydrothermally altered, as manifested by loss on ignition (LOI) values higher than 3 wt% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>), plots that employ trace elements considered to be immobile during hydrothermal alteration are used in the discussion. Plots of whole-rock Nb/Y and Zr/TiO<sub>2</sub> of representative samples of the diatreme breccia, volcanic and intrusive rocks associated with the Co-O deposit in the diagram by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83743-ref15">15</xref>] show that these units are plotted within the sub-alkaline andesite and basaltic-andesite to basalt</p><table-wrap-group id="1"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Major (in wt%) and trace element (in ppm) compositions of the volcanic, intrusive, and polymictic diatreme breccia units of the Co-O epithermal gold deposit</title></caption><table-wrap id="1_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >13509-A</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >13509-B</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >64775</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >64777</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >COO-01</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Volcanic rock</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Volcanic rock</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Volcanic rock</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Volcanic rock</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Intrusive rock</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SiO<sub>2</sub> (wt%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TiO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.91</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.94</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.63</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MnO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MgO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CaO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LOI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.57</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ba (ppm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >191.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >230.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Co</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.m.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.m.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.m.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.m.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >198.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >159.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Th</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.m.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.m.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.m.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n.m.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.64</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >V</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >223.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >218.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >310.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >189.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nb/Y</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zr/Y</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.01</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="1_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >COO-02</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >COO-03</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >COO-04</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >COO-05</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >COO-06</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Volcanic rock</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Volcanic rock</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Polymictic diatreme breccia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Intrusive rock</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Volcanic rock</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SiO<sub>2</sub> (wt%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.36</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TiO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.81</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MnO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MgO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.44</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CaO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.51</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.51</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LOI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.92</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ba (ppm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >270.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Co</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >227.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >282.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >136.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >167.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >277.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Th</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.58</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >V</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >243.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >223.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >192.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >192.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >218.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nb/Y</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zr/Y</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="1_3"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >COO-07</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >COO-08</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >COO-09</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Polymictic diatreme breccia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Polymictic diatreme breccia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Volcanic rock</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SiO<sub>2</sub> (wt%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.65</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TiO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.73</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.26</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MnO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MgO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.72</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CaO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.69</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LOI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.63</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ba (ppm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Co</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >147.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >269.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >212.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Th</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.89</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >V</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >189.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >127.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >212.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nb/Y</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zr/Y</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.87</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><p>and alkali basalt regions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). Samples of the polymictic diatreme breccia mainly plot in the andesite-basalt field, intrusive rocks in the sub-alkaline basalt, and volcanic rocks in the sub-alkaline andesite-basalt to basalt and alkali basalt regions.</p><p>Polymictic (diatreme) breccia, intrusive and volcanic rocks mainly plot within the calc-alkaline and island arc tholeiite fields, with basalt, basaltic andesite and andesite to dacite composition in the whole-rock Th-Co discrimination diagram by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83743-ref16">16</xref>] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>).</p><p>Previous works on whole-rock major and trace element compositions of the Oligocene igneous host rocks of the Co-O epithermal gold deposit (i.e., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83743-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83743-ref3">3</xref>] ) likewise plot representative samples of basalt, andesite, and dacite dominantly in the calc-alkaline magma series, with a few in the tholeiitic magma series. A more extensive geochemical study on Mindanao igneous rocks [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83743-ref17">17</xref>] suggested that the island was formed over time from different successive arc systems, two of which are the Eocene to Oligocene (45 - 25 Ma) island arc tholeiitic magmatism and Early Miocene (20 - 16 Ma) large ion lithophile element (LILE: Cs, Rb, Ba, U, K)-rich calc-alkaline to potassic calc-alkaline magmatism.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Alteration</title><p>In general, all of the polymictic diatreme breccia, intrusive and volcanic rocks associated with the Co-O deposit exhibit low to intermediate degree of alterations. These include chlorite alteration of hornblende and/or clinopyroxene, as well as K-feldspar, calcite and/or clay alteration of plagioclase.</p><p>Using the “alteration box plot” by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83743-ref18">18</xref>] , which incorporates Ishikawa alteration index (AI) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83743-ref19">19</xref>] with chlorite-carbonate-pyrite index (CCPI), the alteration trends of the rocks directly show the alteration mineralogy and degree of alteration of each of the rock unit according to their lithogeochemistry (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). In the diagram, the AI reflects the ratio of the principal rock-forming elements that were gained (K<sub>2</sub>O + MgO) during chlorite and sericite alteration with the total elements that were gained and lost (K<sub>2</sub>O + MgO + Na<sub>2</sub>O + CaO) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83743-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83743-ref18">18</xref>] . The CCPI, on the other hand, is used to measure MgO and FeO increase associated with the Mg-Fe chlorite development, wherein albite, K-feldspar, or sericite in volcanic rocks are typically replaced and lead to loss in Na<sub>2</sub>O and K<sub>2</sub>O content [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83743-ref18">18</xref>] . Mineral end-members such as epidote, calcite, dolomite, ankerite, chlorite, pyrite, sericite, K-feldspar, and albite plot on the box boundaries (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). The alteration box plot is composed of the diagenetic alteration field (lower left) and hydrothermal alteration field (upper right). At the center of the diagram is the box for least altered volcanic rocks, while beyond this box are the hydrothermally altered volcanics plotted at different locations depending on the main hydrothermal minerals contained. Common trend lines associated with hydrothermal alteration are, namely: weak sericite alteration, intense sericite-chlorite &#177; pyrite alteration, chlorite &#177; pyrite (&#177;sericite) alteration, chlorite-carbonate alteration, sericite-carbonate alteration, and K-feldspar-sericite alteration.</p><p>Majority of the polymictic diatreme breccia, intrusive and volcanic rocks plot within the box of least altered intermediate volcanic host rocks (andesite-basalt region) mainly within the hydrothermal alteration field (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). These rocks generally exhibit trends which coincide with the chlorite-carbonate and chlorite &#177; pyrite (&#177; sericite) alteration in the hydrothermal alteration field, consistent with the general alteration to chlorite, calcite and other clay minerals observed in these rocks. The chlorite &#177; pyrite (&#177; sericite) alteration trend line is known to be typical of chlorite-dominated footwall alteration in felsic or mafic volcanic rocks mainly of volcanic-hosted massive sulfides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83743-ref18">18</xref>] . Chlorite-carbonate alteration trend line whilst is normally developed proximal to massive sulfide lenses in a footwall in felsic or mafic host rocks [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83743-ref18">18</xref>] .</p><p>The polymictic diatreme breccia mainly plot in the mid-portion of the least altered andesite-basalt box, with one polymictic breccia plotting in the border between the hydrothermal and diagenetic alteration fields (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). One andesite porphyry plots in the near mid-portion of the least altered andesite-basalt box, and the other towards the upper right corner of the least altered box, following a chlorite-pyrite (-sericite) alteration trend. The volcanic rocks are more dispersed in the alteration box plot, depending on their spatial distribution with respect to the deposit veins. Porphyritic andesite and andesitic volcaniclastic rocks obtained distal to the epithermal veins generally plot in the mid-portion of the least altered andesite-basalt box, whereas andesitic volcanic rocks obtained from the underground mine workings plot towards the upper right border of the least altered box, following a chlorite-pyrite (-sericite) alteration trend, with one sample just outside the upper left corner of the least altered box, following a chlorite-carbonate and/or carbonate-sericite alteration trend (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. K/Ar Dating</title><p>Geochronological analysis using K/Ar dating of the andesite porphyry and polymictic diatreme breccia was outsourced to Activation Laboratories (Actlabs) in Ancaster, Ontario, Canada. Prior to K/Ar dating, bulk samples of these rocks were sent to Actlabs for quantitative evaluation of minerals by scanning electron microscopy (QEMSCAN) and mineral separation. Based on the modal mineralogical study, the mineral selected for age dating is feldspar, which may have partly replaced primary plagioclase (e.g., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83743-ref20">20</xref>] ).</p><p>Selected representative sample of the andesite porphyry plots on the sub-alkaline basalt composition in the Zr/TiO<sub>2</sub> vs. Nb/Y discrimination diagram and on the island arc tholeiitic basaltic andesite-andesite in the Th vs. Co diagram.</p><p>For the polymictic diatreme breccia, geochemical analysis of the selected representative sample of this unit plots on the basaltic andesite composition in the Zr/TiO<sub>2</sub> vs. Nb/Y discrimination diagram and on the calc-alkaline basaltic andesite-andesite in the Th vs. Co diagram.</p><p>Results of the K/Ar dating of the feldspar concentrates yielded ages of 28.6 &#177; 0.9 Ma (Late Oligocene) for the andesite porphyry and 31.7 &#177; 1.9 Ma (Early Oligocene) for the polymictic diatreme breccia (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>In principle, for ideal settings (closed system), age dating of alteration products indicates the age of hydrothermal activity or alteration event, which is typically associated with the mineralization event forming the deposit system (e.g., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83743-ref21">21</xref>] ). Age dating of the hydrothermal minerals therefore gives the age of the hydrothermal activity associated with the mineralization.</p><p>As in previous works (e.g., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83743-ref17">17</xref>] ), the volcanic host rocks of the Co-O deposit is dated to be of Oligocene (~32 Ma) age, possibly attributing to the Eocene to</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Major (in wt%) and trace element (in ppm) compositions of the volcanic, intrusive, and polymictic diatreme breccia units of the Co-O epithermal gold deposit</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sample ID (rock unit)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Dated Mineral/s</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >K, % &#177; σ</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>40</sup>Ar rad, (ng/g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >% <sup>40</sup>Ar air</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Age (Ma)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Error 2σ</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >COO-01 (andesite porphyry)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Feldspar concentrate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.59 &#177; 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.17 &#177; 0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >COO-04 (polymictic diatreme breccia)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Feldspar concentrate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.682 &#177; 0.015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.51 &#177; 0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Standards Bern 4M Muscovite and 1/65 “Asia” rhyolite matrix were measured for <sup>38</sup>Ar spike calibration.</p><p>Oligocene (45 - 25 Ma) island arc tholeiitic magmatism. This implies that the hydrothermal activity related to the Co-O epithermal vein system occurred immediately after or during the Oligocene magmatism.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Summary and Concluding Remarks</title><p>Main points of this study are summarized in the following:</p><p>1) Whole-rock geochemical analyses of the polymictic diatreme breccia, intrusive and volcanic rocks indicate general island arc tholeiitic and calc-alkaline magma series signatures, associated with an island arc subduction setting.</p><p>2) General composition of the polymictic diatreme breccia, intrusive and volcanic rocks ranges from sub-alkaline andesite, basaltic-andesite to basalt and alkaline basalt.</p><p>3) Typical alteration of the polymictic diatreme breccia, intrusive and volcanic rocks associated with the Co-O epithermal gold deposit follows the chlorite-carbonate and chlorite-pyrite (-sericite) alteration trend lines defined in the “alteration box plot” by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83743-ref17">17</xref>] , comparable with the dominant chlorite alteration observed through petrographic analysis of these rocks.</p><p>4) K/Ar dating of hydrothermal minerals from the andesite porphyry and polymictic diatreme breccia samples yielded ages of 28.6 &#177; 0.9 Ma (Late Oligocene) and 31.7 &#177; 1.9 Ma (Early Oligocene), respectively. These ages correspond to the age of the hydrothermal activity in the area, which is in turn related to the timing of the mineralization.</p><p>Integrated with earlier works on age dating and geochemistry of similar rock units along eastern Mindanao, whole-rock geochemical analysis of the volcanic host rocks and an Oligocene age date of the hydrothermal activity from this study corroborate an island arc setting of formation of the rock units corresponding to paleo-latitude reconstruction studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83743-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83743-ref14">14</xref>] , which situate the eastern Mindanao magmatic province to be forming with the Indian and Australian plate subduction along the Sunda-Java Trench system at about 10&#176;S latitude during the Oligocene times, followed by or contemporaneous with the formation of the Co-O epithermal gold vein system prior to the accretion of the different terranes constituting the Philippine archipelago around Miocene.</p><p>This study further confirms the claim that the Co-O deposit is (one, if not) the oldest epithermal gold deposit in the Philippines [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83743-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83743-ref3">3</xref>] . Since most of the deposits in the Philippines are dated to be of Miocene and Pliocene to Pleistocene ages, with some associated with the Philippine Fault that was formed in response to the present geodynamic setting of the archipelago since Miocene times (e.g., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83743-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83743-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83743-ref24">24</xref>] ), the study of older deposits such as the case of the Co-O epithermal gold deposit could provide supplementary lines of evidence in understanding the occurrence and preservation of such deposits in an actively deforming region. In line with this, additional studies, particularly on the characterization of the Co-O epithermal vein system with tectono-kinematic analysis of structural controls and other related structural features, still need to be conducted on the deposit. Additionally, further study on the occurrence of the hydrothermal products must be conducted to ensure the results of the age dating, since this bears a significant impact on the interpretation for the research.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors would like to express their gratitude to the assistance of the Medusa Mining Ltd. and Philsaga Mining Corp. for permitting the research study to be conducted within their mining tenements, and providing technical and logistical support throughout the research. Technical support from the members of the Economic Geology Laboratory in Akita University, with funding and assistance from the New Frontier Leading Program, its staff, and faculty members, and the Japanese government (Monbukagakusho) scholarship program are greatly appreciated. The authors would likewise wish to express their appreciation to Dr. Akira Imai for imparting his knowledge on the subject matter.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Taguibao, K.J.L. and Takahashi, R. (2018) Whole-Rock Geochemistry of Host Rocks and K/Ar Age of Hydrothermal Mineral of the Co-O Epithermal Gold Deposit, Mindanao, Philippines. Open Journal of Geology, 8, 383-398. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2018.84022</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.83743-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Aurelio</surname><given-names> M.A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2000</year>)<article-title>Tectonics of the Philippines Revisited</article-title><source> Journal of Geological Society of the Philippines</source><volume> 55</volume>,<fpage> 119</fpage>-<lpage>183</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83743-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sonntag, I., Kerrich, R. and Hagemann, S.G. (2011) The Geochemistry of Host Arc Volcanic Rocks to the Co-O Epithermal Gold Deposit, Eastern Mindanao, Philippines. Lithos, 127, 564-580. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2011.09.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83743-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sonntag, I., Laukamp, C. and Hagemann, S.G. (2012) Low Potassium Hydrothermal Alteration in Low Sulfidation Epithermal Systems as Detected by IRS and XRD: An Example from the Co-O Mine, Eastern Mindanao, Philippines. Ore Geology Reviews, 45, 47-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2011.08.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83743-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Medusa Mining Ltd. (2017) Quarterly Activities Report Period Ended 30 June 2017. https://www.medusamining.com.au/wp-content/uploads/170731_quarterlyreportjune2017.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83743-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aurelio, M.A., Pena, R.E. and Taguibao, K.J.L. (2013) Sculpting the Philippine Archipelago since the Cretaceous through Rifting, Oceanic Spreading, Subduction, Obduction, Collision and Strike-Slip Faulting: Contribution to IGMA5000. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 72, 102-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.10.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83743-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">General Bathymetric Chart of the Oceans (2009) GEBCO Gridded Global Bathymetric Data. British Oceanographic Centre, Liverpool.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83743-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rangin, C., Jolivet, L., Pubellier, M. and The Tethys Pacific Working Group (1990) A Simple Model for the Tectonic Evolution of Southeast Asia and Indonesia Region for the Past 43 m.y. Bulletin de la Societe Geologique de France, 6, 889-905.  
https://doi.org/10.2113/gssgfbull.VI.6.889</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83743-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jarvis, A., Reuter, H.I., Nelson, A. and Guevara, E. (2008) Hole-Filled SRTM for the Globe Version 4. The CGIAR-CSI SRTM 90m Database. http://srtm.csi.cgiar.org</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83743-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Department of Science and Technology—Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology (DOST-PHIVOLCS) (2015) Map of the Distribution of Active Faults and Trenches in the Philippines, April 2015.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83743-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Department of Environment and Natural Resources—Mines and Geosciences Bureau (DENR-MGB), Land Geological Survey Division (2004) Geological Map of the Philippines, 1st Edition. Generated from the Bureau of Mines, Philippines, 1963.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83743-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Quebral, R., Pubellier, M. and Rangin, C. (1996) The Onset of Movement on the Philippine Fault in Eastern Mindanao: A Transition from a Collision to a Strike-Slip Environment. Tectonics, 15, 713-726. https://doi.org/10.1029/95TC00480</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83743-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pubellier, M., Quebral, R., Rangin, C., Deffontaines, M.C., Butterlin, J. and Manzano, J. (1991) The Mindanao Collision Zone: A Soft Collision Zone within a Continuous Neogene Strike-Slip Setting. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 6, 239-248.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/0743-9547(91)90070-E</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83743-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Hall, R. (1996) Reconstructing Cenozoic SE Asia. In: Hall, R. and Blundell, D., Eds., Tectonic Evolution of Southeast Asia, Geological Society of London Special Publication No. 106, 153-184. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1996.106.01.11</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83743-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hall, R. (2002) Cenozoic Geological and Plate Tectonic Evolution of SE Asia and the SW Pacific: Computer-Based Reconstructions, Model and Animations. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 20, 353-431.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1367-9120(01)00069-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83743-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Winchester, J.A. and Floyd, P.A. (1977) Geochemical Discrimination of Different Magma Series and Their Differentiation Products Using Immobile Elements. Chemical Geology, 20, 325-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(77)90057-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83743-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hastie, A.R., Kerr, A.C., Pearce, J.A. and Mitchell, S.F. (2007) Classification of Altered Volcanic Island Arc Rocks Using Immobile Trace Elements: Development of the Th-Co Discrimination Diagram. Journal of Petrology, 48, 2341-2357.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egm062</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83743-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sajona, F.G., Bellon, H., Maury, R.C., Pubellier, M., Quebral, R.D., Cotten, J., Bayon, F.E., Pagado, E. and Pamatian, P. (1997) Tertiary and Quaternary Magmatism in Mindanao and Leyte (Philippines): Geochronology, Geochemistry and Tectonic Setting. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 15, 121-153.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83743-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Large, R.R., Gemmell, B. and Paulick, H. (2001) The Alteration Box Plot: A Simple Approach to Understanding the Relationship between Alteration Mineralogy and Lithogeochemistry Associated with Volcanic-Hosted Massive Sulfide Deposits. Economic Geology, 96, 957-971. https://doi.org/10.2113/96.5.957</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83743-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ishikawa, Y., Sawaguchi, T., Iwaya, S. and Horiuchi, M. (1976) Delineation of Prospecting Targets for Kuroko Deposits Based on Modes of Volcanism of Underlying Dacite and Alteration Halos. Mining Geology, 26, 105-117.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83743-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schoen, R. and White, D. (1967) Hydrothermal Alteration of Basaltic Andesite and Other Rocks in Drill Hole GS-6, Steamboat Springs, Nevada. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 575-B, B110-B119.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83743-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vural, A. (2017) K-Ar Dating for Determining the Age of Mineralization as Alteration Product: A Case Study of Antimony Mineralization Vein Type in Granitic Rocks of Gümüshane Area, Turkey. Acta Physica Polonica A, 132, 792-795.  
https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.132.792</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83743-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mitchell, A.H.G. and Balce, G.R. (1990) Geological Features of Some Epithermal Gold Systems, Philippines. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 35, 241-296.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-6742(90)90041-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83743-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mitchell, A.H.G. and Leach, T.M. (1991) Epithermal Gold in the Philippines: Island Arc Metallogenesis, Geothermal Systems and Geology. Academic Press, London, 457 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83743-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Garwin, S., Hall, R. and Watanabe, Y. (2005) Tectonic Setting, Geology, and Gold and Copper Mineralization in Cenozoic Magmatic Arcs of Southeast Asia and the West Pacific. Economic Geology, 100, 891-930.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>