<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ME</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Modern Economy</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2152-7245</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/me.2018.94038</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ME-83621</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Business&amp;Economics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  The Non-Linear Relationship between Electricity Consumption and Temperature in Taiwan: An Application for STR (Smooth Transition Regression) Model
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Shu-Yi</surname><given-names>Liao</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chi-Chung</surname><given-names>Chen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chia-Sheng</surname><given-names>Hsu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Institute of Economics, Academic Sinica, Taiwan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Applied Economics, National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>victor9999951@hotmail.com(CH)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>08</day><month>04</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>587</fpage><lpage>605</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>9,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2018</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>6,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2018</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>9,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2018</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  This study builds non-linear econometric models to analyze the effects of temperature on electricity consumption in Taiwan by using the smooth transition regression (STR) model and the monthly time-series data from 1983 to 2012. The empirical results indicate that there is a non-linear relationship between electricity consumption and temperature in Taiwan. Furthermore, all the six estimated threshold temperatures are between 25.364&#176;C and 27.156&#176;C, and the average of threshold temperatures is 26.384&#176;C. It implies that Taiwan’s electricity consumption has a non-linear growth if average temperature is higher than the threshold temperature. In addition, the estimated threshold temperature has policy implications for Taiwan’s policy makers, meaning 
  that 
  the threshold temperature in this study can serve as a reference for framing policies of managing electricity demand in Taiwan.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Smooth Transition Regression</kwd><kwd> Electricity Consumption</kwd><kwd> Threshold Temperature</kwd><kwd> Cooling Degree Days</kwd><kwd> ENSO</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body>
  
<sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Electricity consumption is contributed by many types of human activities, such as heating, air conditioning, lighting in both business and residential sectors, and major contributions come from operating equipment in industrial sectors. Whilst lighting and operating equipment might not be directly linked to climate change, heating and air conditioning have a direct impact on air temperature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83621-ref1">1</xref>] . All the climate-change-related impacts on electricity demand and supply can be easily observed from the quantifiable effects of temperature on the use of heating and air conditioning, and these numbers are usually described by different measurements based on the concept of heating degree days (HDDs) and cooling degree days (CDDs).</p><p>HDDs is defined as the sum of negative deviations from the actually measured temperatures to the reference temperature (or base temperature) over a given time period; in contrast, CDDs indicates the sum of positive deviations from the average temperatures to the reference temperature over a given time period. The data frequency of the given time period is usually daily, weekly or monthly. The reference temperature is defined by the temperature level without additionally using electricity for heating or cooling. That is, if the air temperature is comfortable for humans, there will be less electricity consumption for heating or cooling.</p><p>The reference temperature can be generally considered to be 18.3˚C (65˚F) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83621-ref2">2</xref>] . However, Parkpoom and Harrison [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83621-ref3">3</xref>] used 11.7˚C (53˚F) to be the reference temperature in Thailand; Howden and Crimp [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83621-ref4">4</xref>] determined 17.5˚C (63.5˚F) to be the reference temperature for Sydney; Ahmed et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83621-ref5">5</xref>] proposed 14.3˚C (57.7˚F) as the reference temperature for the State of New South Wales in Australia after their calculation; Zachariadis and Hadjinicolaou [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83621-ref6">6</xref>] employed 18˚C (64.4˚F) and 22˚C (71.6˚F) respectively to be the reference temperature of HDDs and CDDs for the area of Mediterranean Europe. In sum, there could be different reference temperatures within different geographical regions.</p><p>Global warming could lead to increases in CDDs and decreases in HDDs, concluded by Benestad [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83621-ref7">7</xref>] , whose report indicates that climate change could trigger more energy consumption due to air conditioning in the hot areas. De Cian et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83621-ref8">8</xref>] used the panel data from 31 countries to investigate the relationship between energy consumption and variations in temperature. Their empirical results suggest that higher average temperature leads to more energy consumption during hot seasons in the warmer countries, but less energy is consumed during cold seasons in the colder countries.</p><p>Hekkenberg et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83621-ref9">9</xref>] assessed the electricity demand pattern in the relatively temperate climate of the Netherlands. They used daily data over the period from 1970 to 2007 to investigate possible trends in the temperature dependence of electricity demand. Although the Netherlands has the minimum electricity demand in the summer months, however, their empirical results showed significant increases in the temperature dependence of electricity demand in the months of May, June, September, October and during the summer holidays. That is, their alarming result sends a signal to raise future expectations for additional peaks of electricity consumption in summer under the in the influence of climate change.</p><p>Moral-Carcedo and Vic&#233;ns-Otero [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83621-ref10">10</xref>] figured out that the relationship between electricity demand and temperature is nonlinear, and the nonlinearity is reflected on the threshold temperatures. They employed the threshold regression model (TR) and the logistic smooth transition regression (LSTR) model to build the relationship between electricity demand and temperature in Spain using daily data from 1995 to 2003.</p><p>In their research, they created the variable of working day effect to capture the variations of electricity demand caused by the activities in the industrial and commercial sectors as well as by the behaviors of households during holidays and on working days. Hence, they could eliminate those effects from electricity demand, then focus more on the pure effects of temperature on electricity demand. Their results showed that the threshold temperatures of the TR model are 15.5˚C (59.9˚F) and 18.4˚C (65.1˚F), and the threshold temperature of the STR model is 18˚C (64.4˚F).</p><p>Bessec and Fouquau [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83621-ref11">11</xref>] investigated the relationship between electricity demand and temperature in 15 European countries over the period from 1985 to 2000 using monthly data. They applied a panel smooth transition regression (PSTR) model to describe the relationship between electricity demand and temperature in those countries and find threshold temperatures for those countries. In addition, in order to estimate the pure effects of temperature on electricity demand, they also followed Moral-Carcedo and Vic&#233;ns-Otero [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83621-ref10">10</xref>] , and used dummy variables to represent summer holidays and time trends to filter out other source of electricity consumptions. Their results showed that the nonlinear pattern was more pronounced in the warm countries among the 15 European countries.</p><p>Lee and Chiu [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83621-ref12">12</xref>] used the PSTR model and took into account the potential endogeneity biases to examine the relationship between electricity demand and temperature of 24 OECD countries over the period from 1978 to 2004. They provided evidence of a U-shaped relationship between electricity consumption and temperature of 24 OECD countries, and the threshold temperature is approximately 11.7˚C (53˚F).</p><p>In sum, to summarize the literature mentioned above, we can highlight two main findings. First, the relationship between electricity consumption and temperature shows nonlinearity in the past cases, so when establishing an econometric model for cases in Taiwan to estimate the effects of temperature on electricity consumption, we should consider possible nonlinear relationship between electricity consumption and temperature. Secondly, the threshold temperature has some policy implications, such as guidance for the management of electricity demand and supply, strategies for mitigating the impact of climate change on electricity.</p><p>To give an example of policy implications on electricity management, the Taiwanese government has introduced a policy since the year 2011 to save energy by asking public sectors to operate air conditioners only if the air temperature is higher than 26˚C (78.8˚F). In addition, once the real threshold temperature is found, it can be applied to computation of the data of CDDs in Taiwan to describe the patterns between temperature and electricity consumption both in the past and in the future. That is, if global warming leads to more temperature degree days, we should consider more power system expansion planning in Taiwan to meet the possible increases in electricity demand in the future. Therefore, we believe that it is worth further discussing how to model the real relationship between electricity consumption and temperature.</p><p>The objective of this study is to utilize the nonlinear econometric approach (STR model) to analyze the effects temperature has on electricity consumption in Taiwan. The estimated results of the STR model provide two mainly contributions to this study. First, we show the evidence of positively nonlinear relationship between electricity consumption and temperature in Taiwan. Secondly, we find that the average threshold temperature for Taiwan is about 26.384˚C (79.3˚F) over the period from 1983 to 2012. Furthermore, there are variations of threshold temperatures among different sample periods, and range of threshold temperatures lies between 25.364˚C and 27.156˚C. The contributions of this study could be turned into policy implications for policy makers.</p><p>The remainder part of this study is organized as follows: Section 2 describes the data source, data descriptive and data processing. Section 3 presents the econometric methodology and the empirical model. Section 4 provides our empirical results. Section 5 is the conclusion of this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2"><title>2. Data</title></sec>
<sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Data Source and Descriptive</title><p>In this study, we use monthly time-series data which cover the period from 1983 to 2012. The original data of electricity consumption per capita (kWh) are collected from MOEABOE [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83621-ref13">13</xref>] , and the gridded dataset of historical climate information from TCCIP [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83621-ref14">14</xref>] is used to compute the monthly average temperature (˚C) over the period from 1983 to 2012.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> displays the descriptive statistics on monthly average temperature in the different time period over 1983 to 2012. In <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, the mean temperature of the past three decades is between 21.997˚C and 22.383˚C. The coldest month in a year are usually January and February, and the hottest month in a year, July and August. In addition, the mean temperature for summer (June, July and August) is between 27.127˚C and 27.460˚C, and the stand deviation of temperature in</p>
<table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Descriptive statistics on temperature</title></caption>
</table-wrap>
</sec>

</body>
<back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.83621-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mideksa, T.K. and Kallbekken, S. (2010) The Impact of Climate Change on the Electricity Market: A Review. Energy Policy, 38, 3579-3585.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.02.035</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83621-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ruth, M. and Lin, A.C. (2006) Regional Energy Demand and Adaptations to Climate Change: Methodology and Application to the State of Maryland, USA. Energy Policy, 34, 2820-2833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.04.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83621-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Parkpoom, S. and Harrison, G.P. (2008) Analyzing the Impact of Climate Change on Future Electricity Demand in Thailand. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 23, 1441-1448. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2008.922254</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83621-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Howden, S. M. and Crimp, S. (2001) Effect of Climate and Climate Change on Electricity Demand in Australia. CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystem.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83621-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ahmed, T., Muttaqi, K.M. and Agalgaonkar, A.P. (2012) Climate Change Impacts on Electricity Demand in the State of New South Wales, Australia. Applied Energy, 98, 376-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.03.059</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83621-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zachariadis, T. and Hadjinicolaou, P. (2014) The Effect of Climate Change on Electricity Needs—A Case Study from Mediterranean Europe. Energy, 76, 899-910.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.09.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83621-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Benestad, R. (2008) Heating Degree Days, Cooling Degree Days, and Precipitation in Europe: Analysis for the CELECT-Project. Report for Norwegian Metting.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83621-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">De Cian, E., Lanzi, E. and Roson, R. (2007) The Impact of Temperature Change on Energy Demand: A Dynamic Panel Analysis. Working Papers 2007.46, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Milan.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83621-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hekkenberg, M., Moll, H.C. and Schoot-Uiterkamp, A.J.M. (2009) Dynamic Temperature Dependence Patterns in Future Energy Demand Models in the Context of Climate Change. Energy, 34, 1797-1806.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2009.07.037</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83621-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moral-Carcedo, J. and Vicéns-Otero, J. (2005) Modelling the Non-Linear Response of Spanish Electricity Demand to Temperature Variations. Energy Economics, 27, 477-494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2005.01.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83621-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bessec, M. and Fouquau, J. (2008) The Non-linear Link between Electricity Consumption and Temperature in Europe: A Threshold Panel Approach. Energy Economics, 30, 2705-2721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2008.02.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83621-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lee, C.C. and Chiu, Y.B. (2011) Electricity Demand Elasticities and Temperature: Evidence from Panel Smooth Transition Regression with Instrumental Variable Approach. Energy Economics, 33, 896-902.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.05.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83621-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">MOEABOE (2015) Energy Statistical Hand Book 2014. Bureau of Energy, Ministry of Economic Affairs, Taiwan.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83621-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">TCCIP (2014) TCCIP Data Service Platform, Taiwan Climate Change Projection and Information Platform. Ministry of Science and Technology, Executive Yuan, Taiwan. https://tccip.ncdr.nat.gov.tw/v2/index_en.aspx</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83621-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Terasvirta</surname><given-names> T. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1994</year>)<article-title>Specification Estimation and Evaluation of Smooth Transition Autoregressive Models</article-title><source> Journal of the American Statistical Association</source><volume> 89</volume>,<fpage> 208</fpage>-<lpage>218</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83621-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dickey, D.A. and Fuller, W.A. (1979) Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 427-431.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83621-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Phillips, P.C.B. and Perron, P. (1988) Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression. Biometrika, 75, 335-346. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/75.2.335</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83621-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saikkonen, P. and Lütkepohl, H. (2002) Testing for a Unit Root in a Time Series with a Level Shift at Unknown Time. Econometric Theory, 18, 313-348.  
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466602182053</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83621-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lanne, M., Lütkepohl, H. and Saikkonen, P. (2002) Comparison of Unit Root Tests for Time Series with Level Shifts. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 23, 667-685.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9892.00285</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83621-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chan, K.S. and Tong, H. (1986) On Estimating Thresholds in Autoregressive Models. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 7, 179-190.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9892.1986.tb00501.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83621-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Luukkonen, R., Saikkonen, P. and Terasvirta, T. (1988) Testing Linearity against Smooth Transition Autoregressive Models. Biometrika, 75, 491-499.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/75.3.491</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83621-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Terasvirta, T. (1998) Modelling Economic Relationships with Smooth Transition Regression. In: Ullah, A. and Giles, D., Eds., Handbook of Applied Economic Statistics, Marcel Dekker, New York, 229-246.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83621-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Areosa, W.D., McAleer, M. and Medeiros, C.M. (2011) Moment-Based Estimation of Smooth Transition Regression Models with Endogenous Variables. Journal of Econometrics, 165, 100-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2011.05.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83621-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Terasvirta, T. (2004) Smooth Transition Regression Modelling. In: Lütkepoh, H. and Kratzig, M., Eds., Applied Time Series Econometrics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 222-242. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606885.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83621-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, P.Y., Chen, S.T., Hsu, C.S. and Chen, C.C. (2016) Modeling the Global Relationships among Economic Growth, Energy Consumption and CO2 Emissions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 65, 420-431.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.074</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83621-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chang, C.C. (2010) A Multivariate Causality Test of Carbon Dioxide Emissions, Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in China. Applied Energy, 87, 3533-3537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.05.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83621-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hao, Y., Chen, H., Wei, Y.M. and Li, Y.M. (2016) The Influence of Climate Change on CO2 (Carbon Dioxide) Emissions: An Empirical Estimation Based on Chinese Provincial Panel Data. Journal of Cleaner Production, 131, 667-677.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.117</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83621-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Holtedahl, P. and Joutz, F.L. (2004) Residential Electricity Demand in Taiwan. Energy Economics, 26, 201-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2003.11.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83621-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">CPC (2015) Climate Prediction Center, National Oceanic and Atomspheric Administration, USA.  
http://www.cpc.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/ensostuff/ensoyears.shtml</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83621-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Godfrey, L. (1988) Misspecification Tests in Econometrics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83621-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Engle, R.F. (1982) Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation. Econometrica, 50, 987-1007.  
https://doi.org/10.2307/1912773</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83621-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Santamouris, M., Cartalis, C., Synnefa, A. and Kolokotsa, D. (2015) On the Impact of Urban Heat Island and Global Warming on the Power Demand and Electricity Consumption of Buildings—A Review. Energy and Buildings, 98, 119-124.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.09.052</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>