<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJBIPHY</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Biophysics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2164-5388</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojbiphy.2018.82005</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJBIPHY-83546</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Role of Electrical Forces in Angiogenesis
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Oliver</surname><given-names>Szasz</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gyula</surname><given-names>Peter Szigeti</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Andras</surname><given-names>Szasz</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zoltan</surname><given-names>Benyo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Dept. Biotechnics, St. Istvan University, G&amp;amp;ouml;d&amp;amp;ouml;ll&amp;amp;ouml;, Hungary</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Institute of Human Physiology and Clinical Experimental Research, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>biotech@gek.szie.hu(OS)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>03</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>49</fpage><lpage>67</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>4,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2018</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>30,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2018</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>2,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2018</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The role of electrical forces in angiogenesis is widely studied. The electric field (EF) induces polarization of the endothelial cells, and in this way, it is a morphogen in angiogenesis. Additional to the polarization, it may build up by newborn cells in the process of cellular fission. Due to the weak direct experimental results on the transitions of endothelial cells, we used an analogy to these epithelial transitions. This involved using the injury current, which induces oriented cell migration and morphological arrangement in wound healing. The injury-current considerations are applied for malignant proliferation as well.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Angiogenesis</kwd><kwd> Polarization</kwd><kwd> Electric Field</kwd><kwd> Injury Current</kwd><kwd> Wound Healing</kwd><kwd> Malignant Proliferation</kwd><kwd> Endothelial Cells</kwd><kwd> Epithelial Cells</kwd><kwd> Mesenchymal Cells</kwd><kwd> Cell Transitions</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Two processes are involved in the expansion of the transport network during the development of an organism: vasculogenesis and angiogenesis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref1">1</xref>] ; the first forms the rough vessel structure, while the latter is responsible for the detail, forming the network together with capillaries. In the post-developmental organism, this process is no longer active, except in special cases, when new vessel parts are required to attach to pre-existing blood vessels. The exceptions like wound healing to repair damaged tissues [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref2">2</xref>] , exercise to increase oxygen delivery [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref3">3</xref>] , and in pathological situations (e.g. solid tumors and inflammation) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref4">4</xref>] . Physiological demand is required to activate angiogenesis. The natural growth of organs and muscles creates hypoxia, the elimination of which requires new vessels. The same hypoxic initialization occurs during malignant cell proliferation when the demand for nutrients is essential for growth.</p><p>A link between tumor growth and angiogenesis was recognized early on [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref5">5</xref>] , and numerous publications have shown that angiogenesis is active in most solid tumors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref6">6</xref>] . Tumours induce angiogenesis in the same way as the developing organ in the period before final maturation of the organism. A hypothesis was developed regarding the dependence of tumor growth and angiogenesis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref7">7</xref>] and was subsequently experimentally proven [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref8">8</xref>] . The process is governed by the endothelial growth factor (EGF) and its specialized form, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Mature endothelial cells must allow both acute and chronic remodeling of the vessel wall.</p><p>In the first stage of angiogenesis, the form of the endothelial cells building up the vessel wall changes in a small area of the wall. The vascular tone reduces, leading to higher permeability of the wall, which could help increase the flux of nutrients in the area.</p><p>In the second stage of angiogenesis, secreted proteolytic enzymes (protease or peptidase) break the long chainlike molecules of proteins into shorter fragments, fluidizing the extracellular matrix (ECM) and promoting cellular mobility. VEGF stimulates the fission of cells, resulting in chemotaxis (chemically promoted migration) directed by the gradients of the growth factor. One of the most important aspects of this scenario is the formation of the various gradients required for morphogenesis. Two particular states exist for endothelial cells (as for other cells): interconnected (bonded) cells that form part of the tissue (endothelial cell) and autonomic, not bonded to neighboring (mesenchymal) cells. Phase-transition between the two states is possible and is called the endothelial-mesenchymal transition (EndMT). EndMT is a complex process in which endothelial cells lose their specific markers, and the adherent connections between the cells are lost when vascular endothelial cadherin (VE-cadherin) unbinds. The cytoskeleton of the cell subsequently becomes disoriented and results in deformable, autonomic mesenchymal cells, which are mobile and are capable of migrating into surrounding tissues.</p><p>EndMT was first recognized in heart development [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref10">10</xref>] . A subset of endothelial cells was observed forming a primitive heart tube with a mesenchymal phenotype and invading the surrounding tissue.</p><p>Embryonic heart formation has provided most of the current knowledge about EndMT. Recently it was shown that EndMT could occur in a variety of pathological conditions including malignancies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref11">11</xref>] . About cancer, EndMT is now recognized as a unique source of cancer-associated fibroblasts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref12">12</xref>] , facilitating tumor progression [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref13">13</xref>] . Nevertheless, the molecular mechanism of EndMT in tumors has not yet been specifically studied, although there is strong evidence that angiogenic vessels can undergo EndMT, playing a role in angiogenesis by forming tip cells, which migrate into adjacent tissue [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref14">14</xref>] . EndMT could be a major mechanism in angiogenesis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref15">15</xref>] and could play a major role in stabilizing the neovasculature during vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. This self-organizing process makes the vascularization fractal, which allows a certain mathematical description of its structure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref16">16</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Cellular Transitions</title><p>The angiogenetic vascularization and the tumor growth are well-modeled mathematically [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref17">17</xref>] , but unfortunately, EndMT and angiogenesis are not understood well enough to explain the transition in detail. EndMT is often described as a form of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref18">18</xref>] . EMT has a basic role in repairing (reconstructing) epithelial injury and can also occur in individual tumor cells as an important mechanism of invasion and metastasis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref22">22</xref>] .</p><p>EMT has been extensively studied and offers an orienting guideline for research on EndMT. Both transitions have a similar mesenchymal phenotype and probably involve common signaling pathways. Consequently, we could use the similarities of EndMT and EMT processes, which are proceeded in some publications too, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref25">25</xref>] .</p><p>It is a plausible assumption that nature works by the same principles, i.e. it solves similar tasks in the same way. We call this assumption the permanence principle. On this basis, to learn about the processes taking place in endothelial cells we study the cells of the epithelium.</p><p>Epithelia separate adjacent tissues from each other and have a specific role in the homeostasis of organs, fixing the post-developed whole organism for the entire life. Epithelia are vital tissues of the body and are the basis of most complex organs. Epithelia form a well-structured layer with tight physical coupling and quasi-translational symmetry similar to crystalline materials, formed by cell-cell junctions with apical-basal polarity. The permanently polarized epithelial sheet is one of the final tissue forms of multicellular organisms.</p><p>Polarization interactions are one of the crucial factors in the building of tissues and organs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref26">26</xref>] . They are not only decisional in epithelial cells, but active in many electrolytes in the human body, where the water structure is polarizable, semi-crystalline [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref27">27</xref>] . This ordering vanishes in malignancy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref28">28</xref>] , facilitating detection [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref29">29</xref>] . It is likely that the ordered water bound to the membrane is oriented by the membrane potential, and by the polarized epithelial sheets as well.</p><p>As the cytoskeleton defines the form of a cell, the adherent connections and junctions need a certain formal condition too. There is a stage of cells when organized in harmonic connections with their neighbors (most common are the epithelial cells) and fixed in this form, losing their intercellular chemical bonds, forming mesenchymal cells. EMT was first studied in embryogenesis. EMT, and the opposite direction the mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) are critical for the development of many tissues and organs in the developing embryo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref30">30</xref>] .</p><p>These processes require a change in the endothelial cells of the existing vessel in the area of attachment. Epithelial cells have an apicobasal polarity, which guides the polarization of the cytoskeleton. Intercellular connections (in the case of epithelial cells these typically involve E-cadherin; regarding endothelial cells these typically involve VE-cadherin) requires connected cytoskeleton inside the cells, where the cadherin-catenin-complex bonds form chains of molecules [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref31">31</xref>] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>Polarization is lacking in mesenchymal cells, which have a spindle-shaped morphology. While the epithelial cells can be connected chemically, the mesenchymal cells have only physical interactions (mechanical connections) with their neighbors.</p><p>EMT can induce in various ways, but the signals of the ECM have a guiding role. There are EMT effectors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref32">32</xref>] , extracellular signals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref33">33</xref>] and collective signals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref34">34</xref>] regulating the exchange of information between cells. This collective harmony is the basis of homeostasis of the complete organism [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref35">35</xref>] . The EMT and MET transitions may involve various chemical complexes as effectors, and in the cycle of transformations may form various endothelial structures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref36">36</xref>] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>), developing new tissue including, unfortunately, tumorous tissues. The cells in this cycle have to break their bonds with their neighbors; they migrate to morphogenetic direction and form chains to build-up a new tube-like structure. The breakage of neighboring connections starts with the collapse of the cytoskeleton of the cells involved. During this step the cells become deformable, and the intercellular adherent connections are terminated. This is the first step in angiogenesis too, whereby the separation of the cells makes it possible to form new connected structures.</p><p>Development of the living orgasm and the consequent tissue homeostasis require the evolutionarily conserved process of EMT. EMT and MET as reverse processes, are essential for the physiological response to injury (wound healing) as well as in carcinogenesis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref37">37</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref38">38</xref>] .</p><p>An important consequence of changes in the polarization of cells is the change in the structure of water associated with them. Water undergoes an order-disorder phase transition that may be connected with cellular proliferation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref39">39</xref>] , and</p><p>could even be one of the key factors in EMT from bio-electromagnetism. As the process of cell fission begins, the water structure gradually becomes disordered around the cell [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref40">40</xref>] , increasing the dielectric permeability of the water [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref41">41</xref>] and changing many transport properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref42">42</xref>] . This is probably connected with the cytoskeletal restructuring that takes place during EMT, with the fixed polarization of the cellular layer being gradually lost, making disorder by of the connected water layer. The increased permittivity caused by disorder further decreases cell-cell adhesion and may be additional support of the cell-division or even for the proliferation. From water ordering and polarization, the two phases of the transition are defined as the beta (β, collective, well polarized, ordered, low dielectric permittivity) and alpha (α, autonomic, not polarized, disordered, high dielectric permittivity) states [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref43">43</xref>] . Highly organized, developed living tissues are naturally built up from water structures in the β state. This cellular fission is well controlled. One of the guiding factors is the water order, which regulates the interaction forces between the cells without considering actual chemical bonds.</p><p>The order-disorder transition of the aqueous electrolytes probably plays a role</p><p>in the α → β transitions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref44">44</xref>] . This ordering of the water states may promote the adherent bonds during the end-stage of MET. In the same way, the changes in the final stages of EMT are supported by the disordering of the surrounding water structures (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p><p>The cells in the healthy tissue are in cooperative interactions mostly run on mitochondria-driven metabolism, producing 36 ATPs from one glucose molecule in the rather complex Krebs cycle. When cellular cleavage starts, a larger energy flux is necessary to support the production of the daughter cells or simply to supply energy for the cellular transitions. The larger demand for energy could activate glycolytic energy production mainly under hypoxic conditions. Mesenchymal cancer cells are mostly hypoxic, and so exhibit a high rate of glycolysis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref45">45</xref>] . In this simple process, only two ATPs are produced from one glucose molecule. The efficacy of this glycolysis is low but is compensated by the large flux of materials due to the very simple production process. The intensive energy flux of the fermentative metabolism increases the heat liberated in the cell, and thus the temperature gradient between the extra and intracellular compartments. The increasing temperature difference will eventually reach a critical threshold, at which the heat flow changes from conductive to convective [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref46">46</xref>] . The convective flow promotes ionic flow through the cellular membrane, increasing the membrane permeability to glucose and thus supporting the glycolytic way of metabolism together with changes in the intracellular circulation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref47">47</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref48">48</xref>] .</p><p>An interesting relation between energy flux and cooperativity in vitro, the specific metabolic rate in the cultured cells was constant [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref49">49</xref>] in conditions when overall metabolic rate normalized to the actual mass. The reason for this is simple: when available nutrient levels are practically infinite due to the permanent concentration of nutrients for the culture, the efficacy of energy use is not an issue. High supportive energy flux makes the cells autonomic, placing them in the α state. However, when the cells are cooperative the scaling shows (−1/4) exponent [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref47">47</xref>] , which characterizes the general allometric scaling of the specific metabolic rate vs. mass [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref50">50</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref51">51</xref>] . Consequently, the metabolic rate depends on collectivity; when cells are cooperative, the efficacy of energy consumption is better than in the case of autonomic cells. A low energy supply makes the cells cooperative and also sophisticated, being very efficient in power generation and environmental adaptation as well. A spectacular demonstration of this is shown by slime-mold cells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref52">52</xref>] . In the case of “infinite” nutrient availability, the cells are autonomic. However, upon starvation of slime mold, some cells act as collecting centers, leading to the aggregation of cells, and enhancing the efficacy of energy use due to the limited availability of nutrients.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Effect of EF</title><p>There are two consequences of the separation of epithelial cells: the cytoskeleton collapses at least partially, and the intercellular bonds disintegrate (at least intercellular signaling is disrupted). In this way, cell migration is promoted, and a new kind of elongated, fusiform cellular arrangement could appear, allowing the formation of chain-like structures. Effectors promote this process. They free the cells and allow the reorganization of the cells (transforming them into the mesenchymal form). One of the effectors of this process is a form-factor that is responsible for morphogenesis: this is the electric field (EF) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref53">53</xref>] .</p><p>The epithelial and mesenchymal cells differ from a functional and phenotypic point of view. Epithelial cells form layers in which the cells interact closely and are well connected by specific transmembrane proteins, forming adherent connections and various junctions. The epithelial cells are polarized in the apical-basolateral direction, due to the special local distribution of cadherin and integrin molecules, and the surrounding ordered structure of aqueous electrolyte (β state). Epithelial cells may have some displacements in their neighborhood but strictly remain in the epithelial layer.</p><p>Mesenchymal cells do not form any ordered layer, do not show polarization and are not connected by adherins, integrins or junctions. They have a disordered aqueous electrolyte structure (α state). Their fusiform shape, as well as the disordered electrolyte structure, supports their migration and the formation of chains. This shape ensures the heterogenic charge distribution on their membrane, which influences the chain orientation and ordering and supports their migration along the lines of EF. Hypoxic and necrotic cells liberate EMT effectors into the ECM, supporting the destruction of connections between the endothelial cells and collapsing the standard cytoskeletal network intracellularly.</p><p>Electromagnetic effects could initiate regeneration of the intercellular connection (transformation from α-state to β-state). Experiments show the reestablishing of the E-cadherin β-catenin complex intercellular bonds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref54">54</xref>] , and downregulates the molecular factors for neoangiogenesis, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref55">55</xref>] .</p><p>The role of EF-induced biocurrents has been debated in biophysics for many years. The automatic biological charge transfers have an important role and might be a basic phenomenon of tissue repair [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref56">56</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref57">57</xref>] .</p><p>To clarify the role of EF as an effector of angiogenesis, we again apply the permanence principle, using the morphogenesis of epithelial cells to investigate in detail the processes connected to wound healing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref58">58</xref>] . The inner side of the epithelial layer is positively charged, while the outside is negative. In the cornea (which has been studied in detail), this gradient, which is called the transcorneal potential difference (TPC), is caused by an active ion pump that produces an influx of positive Na<sup>+</sup> and K<sup>+</sup> ions and efflux of negative Cl-ions. The value of the TPC is typically 40 mV. In the case of injury, the wound in the epithelium provides a short-cut, its potential tends to zero in this localization. However, in distance of 05 - 1 mm, the original potential value could be measured, causing a certain gradient of EF. This EF-difference induces electric current directed to the wound (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). The current, powered by this process of the endogenous field-strength, is called injury-current, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref59">59</xref>] .</p><p>The injury current certainly plays a central role in wound healing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref60">60</xref>] . Injury currents are physiological [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref61">61</xref>] , and their typical value is around 100 &#181;A/cm<sup>2</sup> on the physiological potential-gradient drops ~100 mV/cm and may be extended to mm distance from the wound [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref50">50</xref>] . This very low power (approx. 0.01 mW/g) does not increase the local temperature, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref62">62</xref>] , but can be measured using high-tech methods during the wound-healing process [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref63">63</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref64">64</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref65">65</xref>] . The EF in the tissue is oriented to the wounded area, and the current has a closed loop through the surface of the epithelium, with the current traveling from inside to the surface of the wound itself. This electrically controls the wound-healing process and persists as long as the wound exists. It regulates the orientation and the frequency of cell division [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref66">66</xref>] , directs the cell migration to heal the wound [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref67">67</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>The endogenous EF that gives rise to the injury current is a primary morphogen, acting on the inner side of the epithelium. The physiological effects of the endogenous EF are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>.</p><p>During the wound-healing process, cells isolate themselves from others, breaking the adherent connections and junctions, while de-structuring of the cytoskeleton results in deformability and the possible formation of new shapes. The injury itself produces growth factors and compounds promoting cellular fission. This effect is intensive apart from the wound, where the injury-induced</p><p>electric field is low. Together with the new cells, the wound shows directional proliferation (centripetal migration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref68">68</xref>] , regulated from a relatively large distance, 0.5 - 1 mm). The steps in wound healing are as follows:</p><p>・ Cells migrate from the distant (healthy) domains toward the wound (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>);</p><p>・ The axis of proliferation is oriented at the verge of the wound. Proliferation declines gradually with distance from the wound;</p><p>・ The current is proportional to the EF-induced by the injury;</p><p>・ The speed of wound healing is accelerated by a higher EF;</p><p>・ EF controls cell proliferation at the wound. It orients the cells and the development of the nerve and transport networks;</p><p>・ EF changes the distribution of the receptors of growth factors along the cell membranes;</p><p>・ The normalized on control of potential difference could be altered by drugs.</p><p>At the start of angiogenesis new cells develop, and these are more negatively charged than their older counterparts; furthermore, their supply of nutrients and oxygen is not yet organized. The local hypoxia induces VEGF, which is supported by the gradient of EF caused by the negative newborn cells. In this case, the new cells in meaning to generate EF and EF-induced current play the same role as a wound. The old vessel wall starts rearranging in isolated areas, and the free wound helps build up the new vessel network by the injury current. Vessel forming may lead to bifurcative branching, for what the mathematical model exists [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref69">69</xref>] . We state that the morphogenesis needs EF, as it controls the orientation of cell fission, and regulates the direction of cell migration as well as the movement of compounds (like growth factors) towards the site of action.</p><p>Based on the permanence principle we hypothesize that the EF is caused by the cleavage and appearance of the new cells (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>).</p><p>Experimental proof of the oriented cell division of epithelial cells has been</p><p>presented [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref70">70</xref>] . The endogenous EF organizes the dipole molecules and could increase the lipids and associated receptors of growth factors on the negative pole. When the ends of astral microtubules bind to the transmembrane proteins, the EF orients the spindle microtubules intracellularly.</p><p>Possible mechanisms of cell migration are also connected to the effect of EF. Without EF the cells would have a negative membrane potential and an equilibrated distribution of charges (dipoles) in the membrane. When EF appears the side of the cell nearest to the positive pole hyperpolarizes. This polarization effect modifies the Ca<sup>2+</sup> transport from the ECM. When neglecting the voltage-gated effects, the diffusion will form a larger concentration of Ca<sup>2+</sup> in the intracellular electrolyte on the positive pole of the cell than on the negative side. Due to this misbalance, the positive side of the cell undergoes a contraction, while the negative side dilates at the same time. This causes a displacement (migration) of the cell in the positive-to-negative direction of the EF [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref71">71</xref>] .</p><p>In the case of active voltage-gated ionic channels are considered the ion concentration on the positive side of the cytoplasm increases by diffusion. On the negative electric pole of the cell, the activity of voltage-gated channels will be intensified by the depolarization of the EF. These effects both lead to contraction of the cell. The direction of the displacement is determined by the size of the contractions. The action of voltage-gated ion channels is more efficient than diffusion, causing migration in the opposite direction than would occur without voltage-gated channels. Migration may involve individual cells and clusters of cells too.</p><p>Oriented cell fission and migration are highest at the edge of the wound, while proliferation is maximal when the EF is zero. This means that wound healing results from centripetal cell migration towards the wound. More precisely, the process of migration delivers the cells, but the oriented cell division makes it ordered and forms the tissue structure.</p><p>The above considerations of the permanence principle in the case of angiogenesis suggest that the endothelial cells migrate from a distance guided by the old vessel wall towards the negative newborn cells, where the large EF accelerated migration and oriented cellular fission. This may explain how the diameter of the blood vessel becomes smaller and the tube narrower, forming a capillary in the distance. In the next step of angiogenesis, the cells leave its cycle in a hostile environment to survive and build up a physiological capillary structure. In the final step of angiogenesis, the appropriate ECM is built up, cellular connections are formed, and other cells (like smooth muscle cells) complete the complex structure of the vessel tissue. Angiopoietin molecules play a role in this stage of development, by uniting the new capillary with the existing one, forming a physiologically functional structure.</p><p>The effectors forming the cellular connections are mandatory in the angiogenic process. These connections probably start with E-cadherin, which initializes the next steps via EF construction. The electrochemistry of the cytoskeleton polymerization may be as follows: The positive side of the cell is hyperpolarized, increasing the Ca<sup>2+</sup> influx into the cell by diffusion. On the negative side, the voltage-gated channels pump more Ca<sup>2+</sup> into the cell. In this way the Ca<sup>2+</sup> concentration in the cell gradually increases, activating the rho GTPases:</p><p>Ca<sup>2+</sup> &#174; adenylate cyclase &#174; cAMP/PKA &#174; rho GTPases &#174; cytoskeleton</p><p>which is mandatory in the building of the cytoskeleton [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref50">50</xref>] .</p><p>It is clear that the process is the same when the EF is in the opposite direction; consequently, the process takes place in the alternating field too, although the direction of migration would be indefinite.</p><p>Via this process, the cells finally build the vessel wall, and gradually build up their final communication channels too.</p><p>The final stage of angiogenesis comprises remodeling when the complete network is optimized for its task. The un-used capillaries dissolve, and anastomoses appear between the capillaries.</p><p>All the above considerations are entirely applicable to the development of malignancy. The malignant tissue has a specific gradient in potential with its healthy neighborhood [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref62">62</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref71">71</xref>] , and this acts to promote and direct cancer cell migration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref72">72</xref>] . There are arguments on the cancerous process as a wound repair [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref73">73</xref>] . The bio-system falsely recognizes the tumor as a wound and stimulates its environment to heal the irregularity (that is, to produce cells to heal the wound). This false wound-healing mechanism is actively supported by the actual injury currents caused by the potential gradients.</p><p>Cancer treatment has been developed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref74">74</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref75">75</xref>] based on the concept of “biologically closed electric circuits” (BCEC) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref76">76</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref77">77</xref>] . This type of method involves applying an external electric field to generate currents, and has been found effective against cancer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref78">78</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref79">79</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref80">80</xref>] . Wound healing by external EF stimulation has also been reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref81">81</xref>] .</p><p>Dielectric polarization depends on the gradients of permittivity and the natural logarithm of conductivity. Due to the weak dependence on conductivity, let us consider the permittivity gradient as a linear function:</p><p>E &#175; ⋅ Δ = ρ (1)</p><p>where Δ is the gradient of permittivity (Δ = grad(ε)), E is the electric field, and ρ is the density of charge in the target. For the easiest geometry let us consider a disc-shaped skin cancer (surface tumor) with full cylindrical symmetry. Given its higher permittivity and negative charge compared to its healthy neighbors, the distribution of the physical parameters shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> is realistic.</p><p>The geometry of the tumor involves the maximal value of the space charge, and E and Δ = grad(ε) are parallel enough to calculate the product of their absolute values. The permittivity gradient is opposite to the field-strength vector, due to the negative charge of cancer. To compensate the negative space charge, the field restricts the electric current to the cancer disc, starting an injury current between the cancerous and healthy parts. This current could dedifferentiate</p><p>healthy cells into multipotent ones, which could become autonomic and redifferentiate into cancerous cells. This mechanism creates “precancerous cells” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref82">82</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref83">83</xref>] . Injury current is not able to compensate the space charge. Due to the high metabolic rate of the tumor, the cancerous cells are in a state of permanent division and produce a negative space charge. The natural mechanisms of the bio-system are not able to block the cancerous growth after a certain size. Consequently, artificial intervention to deliver positive charges to compensate could be helpful. For this, the necessary electric field strength should be parallel with the gradient of permittivity.</p><p>In cancerous proliferation, the massive numbers of newly produced cells create a definite EF. The injury current becomes permanent. The simplest reason for this is the grouping of the newborn cells, which have no possibility of neutralizing themselves to the potential of the natural surroundings. (The new cells are charged more negatively than the cells in the normal host tissue.) It can be hypothesized that as a constrained current the injury current depolarizes the cell membrane. The depolarization of the cell membrane is associated with proliferation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref84">84</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83546-ref85">85</xref>] , and therefore could induce cell division and wound healing.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>We argue that the process of angiogenesis is guided by the EF, which itself arises due to the polarization and proliferation of cells. By analogy with the epithelial-mesenchymal-transformation, we have reached conclusions about the endothelial-mesenchymal-transformation. The analogy shows a perfect fit with the available literature, so we can conclude that electric field and its effect on charge distribution have a role in endothelial-mesenchymal-transformation and consequently in the neoangiogenesis as well.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was supported by the Hungarian Competitiveness and Excellence Programme Grant (NVKP_16-1-2016-0042).</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Szasz, O., Szigeti, G.P., Szasz, A. and Benyo, Z. (2018) Role of Electrical Forces in Angiogenesis. Open Journal of Biophysics, 8, 49-67. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbiphy.2018.82005</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.83546-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Patan, S. (2004) Vasculogenesis and Angiogenesis. Cancer Treatment and Research, 117, 3-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8871-3_1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Greaves, N.S., Ashcroft, K.J., Baguneid, M., et al. (2013) Current Understanding of Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms in Fibroplasia and Angiogenesis during Acute Wound Healing. Journal of Dermatological Science, 72, 206-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdermsci.2013.07.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Prior, B.M., Yang, H.T. and Terjung, R.L. (2004) What Makes Vessels Grow with Exercise Training? Journal of Applied Physiology, 97, 1119-1128. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00035.2004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adams, R.H. and Alitalo, K. (2007) Molecular Regulation of Angiogenesis and Lymphangiogenesis. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 8, 464-478. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2183</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Algire, G.H. (1945) Vascular Reactions of Normal and Malignant Tissues in Vivo. I. Vascular Reactions of Mice to Wounds and to Normal and Neoplastic Transplants. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 6, 73-85. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/6.1.73</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hanahan, D. and Weinberg, R.A. (2000) The Hallmarks of Cancer. Cell, 100, 57-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81683-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Folkman, J. (1971) Tumor Angiogenesis: Therapeutic Implications. The New England Journal of Medicine, 285, 1182-1186. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197111182852108</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Folkman, J. (1984) Angiogenesis. In: Jaffe, E.A., Ed., Biology of Endothelial Cells, Nijhoff, Boston, 412-428. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2825-4_42</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Markwald, R.R., Fitzharris, T.P. and Smith, W.N. (1975) Structural Analysis of Endocardial Cytodifferentiation. Developmental Biology, 42, 160-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-1606(75)90321-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Markwald, R.R., Fitzharris, T.P. and Manasek, F.J. (1977) Structural Development of Endocardial Cushions. The American Journal of Anatomy, 148, 85-119. https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1001480108</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zeisberg, E.M., Potenta, S., Xie, L., et al. (2007) Discovery of Endothelial to Mesenchymal Transition as a Source for Carcinoma—Associated Fibroblasts. Cancer Research, 67, 10123-10128. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-3127</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zeisberg, E.M., Tarnavski, O., Zeisberg, M., et al. (2007) Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition Contributes to Cardiac Fibrosis. Nature Medicine, 13, 952-961. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1613</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kalluri, R. and Zeisberg, M. (2006) Fibroblasts in Cancer. Nature Reviews Cancer, 6, 392-401. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1877</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gerhardt, H., Golding, M., Fruttiger, M., et al. (2003) VEGF Guides Angiogenic Sprouting Utilizing Endothelial Tip Cell Filopodia. The Journal of Cell Biology, 161, 1163-1177. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200302047</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Armulik, A., Abramsson, A. and Betsholtz, C. (2005) Endothelial/Pericyte Interactions. Circulation Research, 97, 512-523. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.0000182903.16652.d7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mancardi, D., Varetto, G., Bucci, E., et al. (2008) Fractal Parameters and Vascular Networks: Facts &amp; Artifacts. Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling, 5, 1-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xu, J., Vilanova, G. and Gomez, H. (2016) A Mathematical Model Coupling Tumor Growth and Angiogenesis. PLoS ONE, 11, e0149422. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149422</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Potenta, S., Zeisberg, E. and Kalluri, R. (2008) The Role of Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Cancer Progression. British Journal of Cancer, 99, 1375-1379. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604662</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Batlle, E., Sancho, E., Franci, C., et al. (2000) The Transcription Factor Snail Is a Repressor of E-Cadherin Gene Expression in Epithelial Tumour Cells. Nature Cell Biology, 2, 84-89. https://doi.org/10.1038/35000034</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cano, A., Perez-Moreno, M.A., Rodrigo, I., et al. (2000) The Transcription Factor Snail Controls Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transitions by Repressing E-Cadherin Expression. Nature Cell Biology, 2, 76-83. https://doi.org/10.1038/35000025</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zavadil, J. and Bottinger, E.P. (2005) TGF-Beta and Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transitions. Oncogene, 24, 5764-5774. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1208927</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tse, J. and Kalluri, R. (2007) Mechanisms of Metastasis: Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition and Contribution of Tumor Microenvironment. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, 101, 816-829. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.21215</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kovacic, J.C., Mercader, N., Torres, M., et al. (2012) Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal and Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition from Cardiovascular Development to Disease. Circulation, 125, 1795-1808. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.040352</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gurzu, S., Turdean, S., Kovecsi, A., Contac, A.O., et al. (2015) Epithelial-Mesenchymal, Mesenchymal-Epithelial, and Endothelial-Mesenchymal Transitions in Malignant Tumors: An Update. World Journal of Clinical Cases, 3, 393-404. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v3.i5.393</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Piera-Velazquez, S., Zhaodong, L. and Jimenez, S.A. (2011) Role of Endothelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EndoMT) in the Pathogenesis of Fibrotic Disorders. The American Journal of Pathology, 179, 1074-1081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.06.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bryant, D.M. and Mostov, K.E. (2008) From Cells to Organs: Building Polarized Tissue. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 9, 887-901. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2523</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cope, F.W. (1969) Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Evidence using D2O for Structured Water in Muscle and Brain. Biophysical Journal, 9, 303-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(69)86388-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hazlewood, C.F., Chang, D.C., Medina, D., et al. (1972) Distinction between the Preneoplastic and Neoplastic State of Murine Mammary Glands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 69, 1478-1480. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.69.6.1478</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Damadian, R. (1971) Tumor Detection by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. Science, 171, 1151-1153. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3976.1151</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thiery, J.P. and Sleeman, J.P. (2006) Complex Networks Orchestrate Epithelialmesenchymal Transitions. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 7, 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1835</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liang, X., Gomez, G.A. and Yap, A.S. (2015) Current Perspectives on Cadherin-Cytoskeleton Interactions and Dynamics. Dove Medical Press, 7, 11-24.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tsai, J.H. and Yang, J. (2013) Epithelial-Mesenchymal Plasticity in Carcinoma Metastasis. Genes &amp; Development, 27, 2192-2206. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.225334.113</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wai, L.T. and Weinber, R.A. (2013) The Epigenetics of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Plasticity in Cancer. Nature Medicine, 19, 1438-1449. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3336</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wong, I.Y., Javaid, S., Wong, E.A., et al. (2014) Collective and Individual Migration Following the Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition. Nature Materials, 13, 1063-1071. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4062</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hegyi, G., Vincze, Gy. and Szasz, A. (2012) On the Dynamic Equilibrium in Homeostasis. Open Journal of Biophysics, 2, 64-71. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbiphy.2012.23009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tyler (2015) Understanding Mesenchymal to Epithelial Cell Transition May Be Key for Neo-Growth Plates. Natural Height Growth. http://www.naturalheightgrowth.com/2015/11/11/understandingmesenchymalendothelialcelltransitionmaykeyneogrowthplates/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thiery, J.P., Acloque, H., Huang, R.Y., et al. (2009) Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transitions in Development and Disease. Cell, 139, 871-890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.11.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hugo, H., Ackland, M.L., Blick, T., et al. (2007) Epithelial-Mesenchymal and Mesenchymal-Epithelial Transitions in Carcinoma Progression. Journal of Cellular Physiology, 213, 374-383. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.21223</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Szentgyorgyi, A. (1998) Electronic Biology and Cancer. Marcel Dekker, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Szentgyorgyi, A. (1957) Bioenergetica. Academic Press, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Buchner, R., Barthel, J. and Stauber, J. (1999) The Dielectric Relaxation of Water between 0 &amp;deg;C and 35 &amp;deg;C. Chemical Physics Letters, 306, 57-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(99)00455-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gascoyne, P.R., Pethig, R. and Szentgyorgyi, A. (1981) Water Structure-Dependent Charge Transport in Proteins (Protons/Electrons/Charge Transfer/Dielectric Dispersion). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 78, 261-265.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Szentgyorgyi, A. (1978) The Living State and Cancer. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Szentgyorgyi, A. (1968) Bioelectronics: A Study on Cellular Regulations, Defense and Cancer. Acad. Press, New York, London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shiraishi, T., Verdone, J.E., Huang, J., et al. (2014) Glycolysis Is the Primary Bioenergetic Pathway for Cell Motility and Cytoskeletal Remodeling in Human Prostate and Breast Cancer Cells. Oncotarget, 6, 130-143.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kurakin, A. (2009) Scale-Free Flow of Life: On the Biology, Economics, and Physics of the Cell. Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling, 6, 6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hochachka, P.W. (1999) The Metabolic Implications of Intracellular Circulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96, 12233-12239. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.22.12233</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Coulson, R.A. (1986) Metabolic Rate and the Flow Theory: A Study in Chemical Engineering. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A, 84, 217-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9629(86)90607-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brown, M.F., Gratton, T.P. and Stuart, J.A. (2007) Metabolic Rate Does Not Scale with Body Mass in Cultured Mammalian Cells. American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 292, 2115-2121. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00568.2006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kleiber, M. (1947) Body Size and Metabolic Rate. Physiological Reviews, 27, 511-541. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1947.27.4.511</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">West, G.B., Brown, J.H. and Enquist, B.J. (1999) The Fourth Dimension of Life: Fractal Geometry and Allometric Scaling of Organisms. Science, 284, 1677-1679. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5420.1677</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bonner, J.T. (1967) The Cellular Slime Moulds. 2nd Edition, Princeton University Press, Princeton.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martin-Belmonte, F. and Mostov, K. (2008) Regulation of Cell Polarity during Epithelial Morphogenesis. Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 20, 227-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2008.01.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yang, K.L., Huang, C.C., Chi, M.S., et al. (2016) In Vitro Comparison of Conventional Hyperthermia and Modulated Electro-Hyperthermia. Oncotarget, 7, 84082-84092.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kim</surname><given-names> E.H.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Song</surname><given-names> H.S.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Seung S.H.</surname><given-names> et al. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2016</year>)<article-title>Tumor Treating Fields Inhibit Glioblastoma Cell Migration, Invasion and Angiogenesis</article-title><source> Oncotarget</source><volume> 7</volume>,<fpage> 65125</fpage>-<lpage>65136</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Becker, R.O. and Selden, G. (1985) The Body Electric. Morrow, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Becker, R.O. (1990) Cross Currents. Jeremy P Tarcher Inc., Los Angeles.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McCaig, C.D., Rajnicek, A.M., Song, B., et al. (2005) Controlling Cell Behaviour Electrically: Current Views and Future Potential. Physiological Reviews, 85, 943-978. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00020.2004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rosch, P.J. and Markov, M.S. (2004) Bioelectromagnetic Medicine. Marcell Decker Inc., New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Reid, B., McCaig, C.D., Zhao, M., et al. (2005) Wound Healing in Rat Cornea: The Role of Electric Currents. FASEB J, 19, 379-386. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.04-2325com</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Barker, A.T., Jaffe, L.F. and Vanable, J.W. (1982) The Glabrous Epidermis of Cavies Contains a Powerful Battery. American Journal of Physiology, 242, 358-366.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Song, B., Zhao, M., Forrester, J., et al. (2004) Nerve Regeneration and Wound Healing Are Stimulated and Directed by an Endogenous Electrical Field in Vivo. Journal of Cell Science, 117, 4681-4690. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.01341</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Carbon, M., Wübbeler, G., Mackert, B.M., et al. (2004) Non-Invasive Magnetic Detection of Human Injury Currents. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 1027-1032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2003.12.035</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Reid, B., Nuccitelli, R. and Zhao, M. (2007) Non-Invasive Measurement of Bioelectric Currents with a Vibrating Probe. Nature Protocols, 2, 661-669. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.91</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mackert, B.M., Mackert, J., Wübbeler, G., et al. (1999) Magnetometry of Injury Currents from Human Nerve and Muscle Specimens using Superconducting Quantum Interferences Devices. Neuroscience Letters, 262, 163-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(99)00067-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Song, B., Zhao, M., Forrester, J.V., et al. (2002) Electrical Cues Regulate the Orientation and Frequency of Cell Division and the Rate of Wound Healing in Vivo. PNAS, 99, 13577-13582. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.202235299</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhao, M. (2009) Electrical Fields in Wound Healing—An Overriding Signal That Directs Cell Migration. Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology, 20, 674-682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2008.12.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Buck</surname><given-names> R.C. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1985</year>)<article-title>Measurement of Centripetal Migration of Normal Corneal Epithelial Cells in the Mouse</article-title><source> Investigative Ophthalmology &amp; Visual Science</source><volume> 26</volume>,<fpage> 1296</fpage>-<lpage>1299</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adler, P.M. (1992) Porous Media Geometry and Transport. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, London, Oxford.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhao, M., Forrester, J.V. and McCaig, C.D. (1999) A Small, Physiological Electric Field Orients Cell Division. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96, 4942-4946.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mycielska, M.E. and Djamgoz, M.B.A. (2004) Cellular Mechanisms of Direct-Current Electric Field Effects: Galvanotaxis and Metastatic Disease. Journal of Cell Science, 117, 1631-1639. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.01125</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pu, J., McCaig, C.D., Cao, L., et al. (2007) EGF Receptor Signalling Is Essential for Electric-Field-Directed Migration of Breast Cancer Cells. Journal of Cell Science, 120, 3395-3403. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.002774</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Meng, X. and Riordan, N.H. (2006) Cancer Is a Functional Repair Tissue. Medical Hypotheses, 66, 486-490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2005.09.041</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nordenstr&amp;ouml;m</surname><given-names> B.E.W. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1978</year>)<article-title>Preliminary Clinical Trials of Electrophoretic Ionization in the Treatment of Malignant Tumors</article-title><source> IRCS Medical Science</source><volume> 6</volume>,<fpage> 537</fpage>-<lpage>540</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nordenstr&amp;ouml;m, B.E.W. (1985) Electrochemical Treatment of Cancer. Annales De Radiologie, 28, 128 129.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nordenstrom, B.W.E. (1983) Biologically Closed Electric Circuits: Clinical Experimental and Theoretical Evidence for an Additional Circulatory System. Nordic Medical Publications, Stockholm.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nordenstrom, B.W.E. (1998) Exploring BCEC-Systems, (Biologically Closed Electric Circuits). Nordic Medical Publications, Stockholm.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Watson</surname><given-names> B.W. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1991</year>)<article-title>Reappraisal: The Treatment of Tumors with Direct Electric Current</article-title><source> Medical Science Research</source><volume> 19</volume>,<fpage> 103</fpage>-<lpage>105</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Samuelsson, L., Jonsson, L. and Stahl, E. (1983) Percutaneous Treatment of Pulmonary Tumors by Electrolysis. Radiologie, 23, 284-287.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Miklavcic, D., Sersa, G., Kryzanowski, M., et al. (1993) Tumor Treatment by Direct Electric Current, Tumor Temperature and pH, Electrode Materials and Configuration. Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics, 30, 209-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/0302-4598(93)80080-E</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ud-Din, S., Sebastian, A., Giddings, P., et al. (2015) Angiogenesis Is Induced and Wound Size Is Reduced by Electrical Stimulation in an Acute Wound Healing Model in Human Skin. PLoS ONE, 10, e0124502. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124502</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Loewenstein, W.R. and Kanno, Y. (1967) Intercellular Communication and Tissue Growth. The Journal of Cell Biology, 33, 225-234. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.33.2.225</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Loewenstein, W.R. (1999) The Touchstone of Life, Molecular Information, Cell Communication and the Foundations of the Life. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, 298-304.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">James, A.M., Ambrose, E.J. and Lowick, J.H.B. (1956) Differences between the Electrical Charge Carried by Normal and Homologous Tumor Cells. Nature, 177, 576-577. https://doi.org/10.1038/177576a0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83546-ref85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Binggeli, R. and Weinstein, R.C. (1986) Membrane Potentials and Sodium Channels: Hypotheses for Growth Regulation and Cancer Formation Based on Changes in Sodium Channels and Gap Junctions. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 123, 377-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(86)80209-0</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>