<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-8792</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojog.2018.83028</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG-83536</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Trends of Macrosomia at University Clinics of Kinshasa
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mbangama-Muela</surname><given-names>Andy</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mulumba</surname><given-names>Kapuku Sylvain</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tozin</surname><given-names>Rahma Rachid</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lumaya</surname><given-names>Ambis Joëlle</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tandu-Umba</surname><given-names>Barthélémy</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mbungu</surname><given-names>Mwimba Roger</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lokomba</surname><given-names>Bolamba Vicky</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mbanzulu</surname><given-names>Pita Damien</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Clinics, Kinshasa, DR Congo</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>dymuela@yahoo.fr(MA)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>05</day><month>03</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>263</fpage><lpage>272</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>23,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2018</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>27,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2018</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>30,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2018</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  <em>Context</em>
  <em>.</em> The prevalence of macrosomia varies through the world according to racial and ethnic factors, life style and importance of non communicable diseases (maternal obesity, diabetes-gestational and type 2), post-term gestation and multiparity. At the University Clinics of Kinshasa (UCK), 30 years ago, the frequency of macrosomia was 2.4%.
   
  <b>Objectives</b>
  . To update data on the frequency of macrosomia at UCK, regarding variations in maternal anthropometrics (obesity) and socio-demographic factors.
   
  <b>Methods</b>
  . A
   cross-sectional study was conducted at UCK from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2016. Mothers who delivered babies weighing at least 4000 g were included in this study.
   
  <b>Results</b>
  . The frequency of macrosomia was 3.7%. Trend shows a variation of this frequency over time with lowest frequency (2.1%) in 2012 and highest (5.3%) in 2009. The mother average age and parity were 32.3 &#177; 5.4 years and 3 &#177; 2, respectively. Pregnancies were complicated by polyhydramnios (48%) and gestational diabetes (19.7%). Caesarean section was performed in 60.5% cases, mainly for macrosomia (47.8%) and 81.6% of newborns had constitutional macrosomia. Adverse obstetrical outcomes of macrosomia were dominated by caesarean section (28.9%), lacerations of birth canal (23%) and neonatal distress (9.2%).
   
  <b>Conclusion</b>
  . Macrosomia remains a constant finding at UCK, and is associated with maternal, fetal and neonatal adverse outcomes. Trend shows a variation of the frequency over time between 2.1% and 5.3%.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Macrosomia</kwd><kwd> Adverse Obstetrical Outcomes</kwd><kwd> University Clinics of Kinshasa</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Macrosomia is defined as a birth weight either greater than 4000 g or over the 90<sup>th</sup> percentile for gestational age [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref1">1</xref>] . Its prevalence varies through the world according to racial and ethnic factors, life style and importance of non communicable diseases (maternal obesity, diabetes-gestational and type 2), post-term gestation and multiparity. The variation of prevalence has also been observed in time for the same population [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref5">5</xref>] . In developed countries, the prevalence of macrosomia, which was between 5% and 20% in 1980 increased by 15% - 25% in 2007 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref2">2</xref>] . In Europe, a Danish study reported an increase in macrosomia incidence from 16.7% in 1990 to 20% in 1999 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref3">3</xref>] . Figures from North America show that proportion of newborns with a birth weight above 90th percentile increased from 5% - 9% in United States and 24% in Canada between 1985 and 1988 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref6">6</xref>] . A Chinese study noted an increase of 6% in 1994, and 7.8% in 2005 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref4">4</xref>] .<sup> </sup>In Africa, macrosomia prevalence varies from 1% to 15% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref7">7</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref13">13</xref>] . In the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), previous studies (30 years ago) estimated its prevalence at 2.4% - 2.7 % [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref14">14</xref>] . Since then, no other study addressed this subject. Our study purpose was to update data on frequency of macrosomia at UCK, regarding variation in maternal anthropometrics (obesity) and socio-demographic factors.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methods</title><p>This cross-sectional study conducted at UCK from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2016 included all women who delivered babies with macrosomia. All records of pregnant women who gave birth to babies with macrosomia at UCK during study period were included. Files containing less than 50% of the variables studied were excluded from this study. A total of 8268 births were recorded during this period and 308 babies were born with macrosoma. Data were collected by review of medical records from delivery room and maternity. Variables collected were maternal age, weight, height, body mass index, parity, gravidity, medical history and pregnancy outcomes (obstetrical pathology, gestational age and mode of delivery). Newborns parameters included weight, APGAR, sex, size, head circumference (HC) and thoracic circumference (TC), type of macrosomia defined by ratio of HC to TC (a ratio of ˂1 defining constitutional macrosomia and that ≥1 defining diabetic macrosomia), congenital malformations and neonatal glycemia. Postpartum adverse outcomes (uterine atony, haemorrhage, endometritis, soft tissue lacerations, puerperal infections) were also recorded.</p><p>Statistical analysis</p><p>Data were verified, numbered and entered using Microsoft Office Excel software; and then exported to SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) version 21.0 for appropriate statistical analysis. Quantitative data were summarized as means and standard deviations, and categorical data as frequencies. The study received approval from the ethical board of Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of UCK.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>In this study we numbered 308 cases of macrosomia out of a total of 8268 deliveries. The frequency was 3.7%. Only 152 files were eligible for study (containing more than 50% of study variables). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows evolution of annual frequency of macrosomia at UCK since 2007. Trend shows a variation of the frequency over time with lowest frequency (2.1%) in 2012 and highest (5.3%) in 2009.</p><p>The mean maternal age was 32.3 &#177; 5.4 years, the majority of mothers (66.4%) having an age range from 20 to 34 years. The mean parity and gravidity were 3 &#177; 2. Multipara and multigravida were 80.9% and 88.8%, respectively. Average maternal weight was 84.7 &#177; 15.1 kg, and 53.3% had less than 90 kg. Mean of Body Mass Index (BMI) was 30.1 &#177; 5.1 Kg/m<sup>2</sup> and 51.3% were obese (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><p>As presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>, risk factors of macrosomia were dominated by BMI &gt; 25 Kg/m<sup>2</sup> (80.9%), followed by male fetus (58.6%), maternal overweight (46.7%) and advanced maternal age (33.6%).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> General maternal characteristics of the study sample</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >n (152*)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age range (years)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ 20 - 34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ ≥35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Primipara (1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Multipara (≥2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >123</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gravidity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Primigravida (1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Multigravida (≥2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >135</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Weight (Kg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ &lt;90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ ≥90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BMI (Kg/m<sup>2</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Normal (18 - 24)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Overweight (25 - 29)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Obesity (≥30)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.3</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>BMI: Body mass index, *Only 152 files were eligible for this study.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Risk factors of macrosomia</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Risk factors</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >n (152)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BMI ≥ 25 Kg/m<sup>2</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >123</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male sex of fetus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maternal overweight (≥90 Kg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maternel age ≥ 35 ans</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Multiparity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Previous macrosomia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gestational diabetes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Previous miscarriage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Family diabetes type 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Previous stillbirth</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Personal diabetes type 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Previous hydramnios</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Previous fetal malformation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>BMI: Body Mass Index.</p><p>Concerning delivery characteristics, mean gestational age was 39.4 &#177; 1.6 weeks, mean uterine fundal-height at the admission in the delivery room was 36.7 &#177; 2.6 cm and 98.7% of deliveries occurred at term and in 60.5% of cases by Caesarean section. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> shows that C-section was performed in 47.8% for fetal macrosomia.</p><p>Average APGAR score was 8 &#177; 2 at birth, and 9 &#177; 1 at the fifth minute. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> shows that 90.8% of newborns had a good APGAR score at birth and 92.1% at the fifth minute. The means of birth weight, height, head and thoracic circumferences were 4235.2 &#177; 314.2 g, 51.8 &#177; 1.9 cm, 36.5 &#177; 2.1 cm and 35.2 &#177; 1.7 cm, respectively. Male newborns represented 58.6% of newborns, with a sex ratio of 0.77. In 81.6% of cases, macrosomia was constitutional.</p><p>Maternal and perinatal adverse outcomes associated with macrosomia, presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>, were dominated, on maternal side, by Caesarean section (28.9%) and lacerations of birth canal (23%), and neonatal distress on perinatal side (9.2%).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>In the present study, the frequency of macrosomia at UCK was 3.7%, higher than that (2.7%) reported 30 years ago [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref14">14</xref>] . This could be owed to changes in maternal BMI [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref15">15</xref>] . Trend showing a variation of this frequency over time between 5.3% in 2009 and 2.1% in 2012 is difficult to explain. This frequency is slightly lower than 5.6%, 5.7%, 6.6% and 7% as reported in Saudi Arabia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref16">16</xref>] , in Lubumbashi (DRC) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref17">17</xref>] , in France [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref18">18</xref>] and in Turkey [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref19">19</xref>] , respectively. It’s higher than those reported in some other studies in Africa by Badji et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref20">20</xref>] , in</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Indications of cesarean section</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Indications</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >n (92)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Macrosomia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Uterine scar</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Fetal malposition</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Acute fetal distress</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Fetal-pelvic Disproportion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Severe chronic fetal distress</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Narrowed pelvis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Severe preeclampsia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Newborn characteristics</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >n (152)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >APGAR score at the first minute</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ 0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ 1 - 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ 4 - 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ ≥7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >138</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >APGAR score at the fifth minute</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ 0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ 1 - 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ 4 - 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ ≥7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >140</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Newborn’s sex</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Type of macrosomia (HC/TC)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Constitutional</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >124</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Diabetic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.4</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>HC: head circumference, TC: Thoracic circumference.</p><table-wrap-group id="5"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Adverse outcomes of macrosomia</title></caption><table-wrap id="5_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >n (152)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maternal outcomes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Cesarean section</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Lacerations of birth canal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Postpartum hemorrhage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Uterine atony</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Premature labor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="5_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Perinatal outcomes</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Neonatal distress</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Prematurity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Stillbirth</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Neonatal death</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Neonatal Hypoglycemia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><p>Senegal, by Thieba et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref21">21</xref>] , in Burkina-Faso and by Kakudji et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref12">12</xref>] , in Kinshasa (DRC) and also by Cheng et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref5">5</xref>] , in China who reported 1.57%, 2.1%, 2.4% and 3.4% respectively. However, our frequency is very lower than those reported by Ananth et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref6">6</xref>] ,<sup> </sup>in Canada (24%) between 1992 and 1996 and by Jensen et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref22">22</xref>] in Denmark (28%).</p><p>Our results are in accordance with literature data which show variation of incidence according to racial and ethnic differences but also with presence of local factors in different regions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref2">2</xref>] . The lower frequency reported by Cheng et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref23">23</xref>] , could be explained by the difference in birth weight distribution probably due to genetic differences and anthropometric disparities between populations. The lower frequency reported in african studies could principally be explained by nutritional insufficiency and lower socio-economic level.</p><p>Macrosomia in our study was mostly observed in mothers with BMI ≥ 25 Kg/m<sup>2</sup> (80.9%), with maternal weight ≥ 90 Kg (46.7%). Several studies have reported higher frequencies of macrosomia in obese women [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref26">26</xref>] , and Henriksen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref2">2</xref>] , found BMI as independent factor of macrosomia. The combination of maternal-transmitted fetal hyperglycemia and fetal hyperinsulinism could explain the high rate of macrosomia in newborns of obese non-diabetic mothers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>Concerning newborns gender, 58.6% were male, a finding also reported in Lubumbashi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref17">17</xref>] , Rabat [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref25">25</xref>] , and Brazzaville [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref27">27</xref>] , where it was reported a frequency of male newborn above 60%. This is in accordance with the role of male hormones.</p><p>In our study, 80.9% of mothers were multipara. Studies have shown that multiparity is a factor that increases risk of macrosomia, irrespective of its association with maternal age. Our results corroborate those of most authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref27">27</xref>] . This finding could be the expression of obesity or diabetes whose risk increases with age. Advanced maternal age (≥ 35 years) and multiparity were associated with fetal macrosomia in our series (33.6% and 32.2% respectively).</p><p>In this study, pregnant women also had a family history of diabetes type 2 (14.5%) or developed gestational diabetes during pregnancy (19.7%). Das et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref28">28</xref>] and Saleh et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref16">16</xref>] reported that diabetes, regardless of its clinical form (type 2 or gestational), is an important factor involved in risk of macrosomia. This is in accordance whith diabetes and obesity as well known risk factors of macrosomia. Our results are consistent with those of several authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref30">30</xref>] . The mechanism, reported in literature, to explain this association is interdependence of metabolism of carbohydrates and lipids, resulting in fetal hyperinsulinism reaction to maternal hyperglycemia. Increased production of insulin, an anabolic hormone, forces carbohydrates into cells, accumulates fatty acids in adipose tissue and proteins in muscles, which is responsible for the onset of macrosomia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref32">32</xref>] . Macrosomia was associated with maternal and perinatal adverse outcomes. Higher risks of infant mortality and traumatic injuries during childbirth have also been reported by Zhang et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref33">33</xref>] , for macrosome neonates with a birth weight greater than 4.500 g. Heiskanen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref34">34</xref>] , particularly cited clavicle or humerus fractures, brachial or facial paralysis, and shoulder dystocia. The most common complications of macrosomia in our study were Cesarean section (28.9%) and soft tissue injuries (23%), while for newborn, it was perpartal distress (9.2%). Chauhan et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref35">35</xref>] and Zhang et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83536-ref33">33</xref>] ,<sup> </sup>also reported maternal adverse outcomes associated with fetal macrosomia, including prolonged labor, cesarean section and postpartum hemorrhage.</p><p>Further research must be focused on the recognition of risk factors during the antenatal visit care and its prevention in the aim to reduce its incidence and thus the related complications.</p><p>The main limitation of this study could be found in the fact that it concerned only one site (monocentric study), which limits extrapolation of results.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Macrosomia remains a constant finding at UCK, and is associated with maternal, fetal and neonatal adverse outcomes. Trend shows a variation of this frequency over time between 2.1% and 5.3%.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Author Contributions</title><p>All authors contributed toward data analysis, drafting and revising the paper and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Disclosure</title><p>The authors report no conflict of interest in this work.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Andy, M.-M., Sylvain, M.K., Rachid, T.R., Jo&#235;lle, L.A., Barth&#233;l&#233;my, T.-U., Roger, M.M., Vicky, L.B. and Damien, M.P. (2018) Trends of Macrosomia at University Clinics of Kinshasa. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 8, 263-272. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2018.83028</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.83536-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">La Vallie, D.L., Gabbe, S.G., Grossman, D.C., Larson, E.B., Baldwin, L.M. and Andrilla, C.H. (2003) Birth Outcomes among American Indian/Alaska Native Women with Diabetes in Pregnancy. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 48, 610-616.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83536-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Henriksen, T. (2008) The Macrosomic Fetus: A Challenge in Current Obstetrics. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 87, 134-145.  
https://doi.org/10.1080/00016340801899289</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83536-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Orskou, J., Kesmodel, U., Henriksen, T.B. and Secher, N.J. (2001) An Increasing Proportion of Infants Weigh more than 4000 Grams at Birth. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 80, 931-936.  
https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.801010.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83536-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lu ,Y., Zhang, J., Lu, X., Xi, W. and Li, Z. (2011) Secular Trends of Macrosomia in Southeast China, 1994-2005. BMC Public Health, 11, 818.  
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-818</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83536-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cheng, Y.K., Lao, T.T., Sahota, D.S., Leung, V.K. and Leung, T.Y. (2013) Use of Birth Weight Threshold for Macrosomia to Identify Fetuses at Risk of Shoulder Dystocia among Chinese Populations. International Journal of Gynecology &amp; Obstetrics, 120, 249-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.10.019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83536-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ananth, C.V. and Wen, S.W. (2002) Trends in Fetal Growth among Singleton Gestations in the United States and Canada, 1985 through 1998. Seminars in Perinatology, 26, 260-267. https://doi.org/10.1053/sper.2002.34772</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83536-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ezegwui, H.U., Ikeako, L.C. and Egbuji, C. (2011) Fetal Macrosomia: Obstetric Outcome of 311 Cases in UNTH, Enugu, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice, 14, 322-326. https://doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.86777</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83536-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">AbdelBagi, A. and Ahmed, M. (2015) Macrosomia at Medani Hospital, Sudan. Journal of Science, 4, 718-720.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83536-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">EL Bakkali, M., Azzouzi, Y., Khadmaoui, A., Thami Ahami, A.O. and EL Khlifi, F. (2014) Les facteurs associés a la survenue de la macrosomie chez le nouveau-né à l’Hopital Régional Cherif Idrissi dans la région du Gharb au Maroc. ESJ, 10, 11-22.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83536-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mai, A.H. and Abbassia, D. (2014) The Prevalence of Fetal Macrosomia at the Specialized Hospital of Gynecology and Obstetrics of Sidi Bel Abbes (West of Algeria). Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences, 4, 272.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83536-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Koyanagi, A., Zhang, J., Dagvadorj, A., Hirayama, F., Shibuya, K., Souza, J.P. and Gulmezoglu, A.M. (2013) Macrosomia in 23 Developing Countries: An Analysis of a Multicountry, Facility-Based, Cross-Sectional Survey. The Lancet, 381, 476-483.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61605-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83536-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ye, J., Torloni, M.R., Ota, E., Jayaratne, K., Pileggi-Castro, C., Ortiz-Panozo, E. Lumbiganon, P., Morisaki, N., Laopaiboon, M., Mori, R., Tuncalp, O., Fang, F., Yu, H., Souza, J.P., Vogel, J.P. and Zhang, J. (2015) Searching for the Definition of Macrosomia through an Outcome-Based Approach in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Secondary Analysis of the WHO Global Survey in Africa, Asia and Latin America. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 15, 324.  
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0765-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83536-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kakudji, L., Mvuezolo, B., Tandu-Umba, N.F.B., Mputu, L. and Yanga, K. (1984) Aspects cliniques et obstétricaux des accouchements des gros enfants en milieu zairois. Annals of African Medicine, 23, 99-102.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83536-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mulende, K. (2003) Accouchement des macrosomes aux Cliniques Universitaires de Kinshasa du 01/01/1994 au 31/12/2000. Mémoire de Spécialisation en Gynécologie et Obstétrique, Université de Kinshasa.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83536-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mbangama, M.A. and Tandu-Umba, B. (2014) Etat nutritionnel gravidique à terme et risque de diabète gestationnel. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 103, S50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-8227(14)70165-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83536-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saleh, A.M., Al-Sultan, S.M., Moria, A.M., Rakaf, F.I., Turkistani, Y.M. and Al-Onazi, S.H. (2008) Fetal Macrosomia Greater than or Equal to 4000 Grams: Comparing Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Women. Saudi Medical Journal, 29, 1463-1469.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83536-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kakudji, L.P., Mukuku, O., Mubinda, K.P., Mwembo, A.T. and Kalenga, M.K.P. (2016) Macrosomie foetale à Lubumbashi: Facteurs de risque et pronostic maternel et périnatal. Pan African Medical Journal, 23, 166.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83536-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fuchs, F., Bouyer, J., Rozenberg, P. and Senat, M.V. (2013) Adverse Maternal Outcomes Associated with Fetal Macrosomia: What Are the Risk Factors beyond Birthweight? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 13, 90.  
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-90</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83536-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Akín, Y., Comert, S., Turan, C., Pícak, A., Agzíkuru, T. and Telatar, B. (2010) Macrosomic Newborns: A 3-Year Review. The Turkish Journal of Pediatrics, 52, 378-383.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83536-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Badji, C.A., Moreau, J.C., Ba, M.G., Diallo, D., Diouf, A., Dotou, C., Tahri, L. and Diadhiou, F. (1999) L’accouchement du gros enfant au CHU de Dakar: Epidémiologie et pronostic. Medecine d’Afrique Noire, 46, 355-358.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83536-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thieba, B., Akontionga, M., Ouedraogo, A., Kaba, T., Ouattara, T., Lankouande, J. and Kone, B. (2004) Gros foetus: Pronostic materno-foetal à propos de 143 cas à la maternité du centre hospitalier universitaire de Ouagadougou. Journal de la SAGO, 5, 22-28.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83536-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jensen, D.M., Damm, P., Sorensen, B., Molsted-Pedersen, L., Westergaard, J.G., Klebe, J. and Beck-Nielsen, H. (2001) Clinical Impact of Mild Carbohydrate Intolerance in Pregnancy: A Study of 2904 Nondiabetic Danish Women with Risk Factors for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. American Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 185, 413-419. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2001.115864</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83536-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cheng, Y.K.Y. and Lao, T.T. (2014) Fetal and Maternal Complications in Macrosomic Pregnancies. Research and Reports in Neonatology, 4, 65-70.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83536-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cedergren, M.I. (2004) Maternal Morbid Obesity and the Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcome. Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 103, 219-224.  
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000107291.46159.00</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83536-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Weiss, J.L., Malone, F.D., Emig, D., Ball, R.H., Nyberg, D.A., Comstock, C.H., Saade, G., Eddleman, K., Carter, S.M., Craigo, S.D., Carr, S.R. and D’Alton, M.E. (2004) Obesity, Obstetric Complications and Caesarean Delivery Rate—A Population-Based Screening Study. American Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 190, 1091-1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2003.09.058</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83536-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Touhami Elouazzani, F., Kabiri, M., Karboubi, L., Keswati, J., Mrabet, M. and Barkat, A. (2012) La macrosomie: A propos de 255 cas. Journal de Pediatrie et de Puériculture, 25, 97-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpp.2011.12.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83536-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Iloki, L.H., Itoua, C., Mbemba Moutounou, G.M., Massouama, R. and Koko, P.S. (2014) Macrosomie foetale: Facteurs de risque et complications materno-foetales à Brazzaville (République du Congo). Médecine d’Afrique Noire, 61, 479-486.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83536-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Das, S., Irigoyen, M., Patterson, M.B., Salvador, A. and Schutzman, D.L. (2009) Neonatal Outcomes of Macrosomic Births in Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Women. BMJ Journals, 94, 419-422. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2008.156026</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83536-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yazdani, S., Yosofniyapasha, Y., Nasab, B.H., Mojaveri, M.H. and Bouzari, Z. (2012) Effect of Maternal Body Mass Index on Pregnancy Outcome and Newborn Weight.  BMC Research Notes, 5, 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-34</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83536-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mochhoury, L., Razine, R., Kasouati, J., Kabiri, M. and Barkat, A. (2013) Body Mass Index, Gestational Weight Gain, and Obstetric Complications in Moroccan Population. Journal of Pregnancy, 2013, Article ID: 379461.  
https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/379461</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83536-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lepercq, J., Timsit, J. and Hauguel-de Mouzon, S. (2000) Etiopathogénie de la macrosomie foetale. Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, 29, 6-12.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83536-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sacks, D.A. (2007) Etiology, Detection and Management of Fetal Macrosomia in Pregnancies Complicated by Diabetes Mellitus. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 50, 980-989. https://doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0b013e31815a6242</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83536-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, X., Decker, A., Platt, R.W. and Kramer, M.S. (2008) How Big Is Too Big? The Perinatal Consequences of Fetal Macrosomia. American Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 198, 517.e1-517.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.12.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83536-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Heiskanen, N., Raatikainen, K. and Heinonen, S. (2006) Fetal Macrosomia: A Continuing Obstetric Challenge. Biology of the Neonate, 90, 98-103.  
https://doi.org/10.1159/000092042</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83536-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chauhan, S.P., Grobman, W., Gherman, R.A., Chauhan, V.B., Chang, G., Magann, E.F. and Hendrix, N.W. (2005) Suspicion and Treatment of the Macrosomic Fetus: A Review. American Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, 193, 332-346.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.020</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>