<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJOHNS</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>International Journal of Otolaryngology and Head &amp; Neck Surgery</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2168-5452</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ijohns.2018.72007</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">IJOHNS-83187</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Articles</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
          <subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>


          Coblation: An Alternative to CO2 Laser and Microdebrider for Laryngeal Papillomatosis

        </article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Dasari</surname>
            <given-names>Samuel Deenadayal</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
            <sup>1</sup>
          </xref>
          <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1">
            <sup>*</sup>
          </xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Nabeelah</surname>
            <given-names>Naeem</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
            <sup>1</sup>
          </xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Vyshanavi</surname>
            <given-names>Bommakanti</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
            <sup>1</sup>
          </xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1">
        <addr-line>Dr. Deenadayal’s ENT Care Centre, Secunderabad, India</addr-line>
      </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <corresp id="cor1">
          * E-mail:<email>aarticlinic@yahoo.com(DSD)</email>;
        </corresp>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>09</day>
        <month>03</month>
        <year>2018</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>07</volume>
      <issue>02</issue>
      <fpage>47</fpage>
      <lpage>54</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>28,</day>
          <month>October</month>
          <year>2017</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="rev-recd">
          <day>19,</day>
          <month>March</month>
          <year>2018</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>22,</day>
          <month>March</month>
          <year>2018</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2014</copyright-year>
        <license>
          <license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <p>


          Objective: To assess the efficacy of coblation in treating laryngeal papillomatosis and its effect on post operative voice outcome.
          Study Design: This is a retrospective study.
          Setting: Tertiary referral centre.
          Subjects and Methods: All the patients diagnosed with laryngeal papillomatosis between January 2013 to December 2016 were included in this study. Preoperative assessment was done with rigid and flexible laryngoscopy. PRAAT software was used for voice analysis. All patients underwent coblation assisted microlaryngeal surgery. Post operatively patients were followed up at 1 week, 15 days, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months with rigid laryngoscopy. Voice analysis was repeated after 3 months to assess the improvement in voice.
          Results: Coblation was found to be effective in treating laryngeal papillomatosis. In our series of seven patients, three patients underwent repeat procedure with coblation for recurrence. But longterm follow up these patients did not reveal any recurrence of laryngeal papillomatosis. Voice analysis revealed a significant improvement in measures of perturbation and maximum phonation time.
          Conclusion: Coblation is a promising alternative to the conventional methods for the treatment of laryngeal papillomas as it can achieve satisfactory disease clearance with good voice quality.

        </p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Coblation</kwd>
        <kwd> Microlaryngeal Surgery</kwd>
        <kwd> Laryngeal Papillomatosis</kwd>
        <kwd> JORRP</kwd>
        <kwd> Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis</kwd>
        <kwd> Laser</kwd>
        <kwd> Microdebrider</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="s1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>
        Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) is characterized by the development of exophytic proliferative lesions of connective tissue covered by epithelium which affect the mucosa of the respiratory tract. HPV 6 and 11 accounts for most cases of laryngeal papillomatosis. RRP shows bimodal age distribution. Juvenile form develops in less than 20 years of age while adult form develops in more than 20 years of age in third and fourth decade of life. There is a strong predilection for larynx hence it is also termed as laryngeal papillomatosis or glottal papillomatosis. The incidence of laryngeal papillomatosis is approximately 4.3 per 100,000 children and about 1.8 per 100,000 adults in the United States [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83187-ref1">1</xref>] . Laryngeal papillomatosis is a rare and benign condition but it can cause significant morbidity due to obstruction of airway, repeated recurrences and spread to distal airways. Mainstay of treatment is surgical debulking of tumour to secure airway while preserving underlying laryngeal tissues and maintaining acceptable voice quality. Surgical removal using lasers is the traditional standard of treatment. Microdebriders have been gaining popularity since it avoids the potential problems caused by lasers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83187-ref2">2</xref>] . In this study, we present a series of cases of laryngeal papillomatosis treated with coblation and their long term follow up.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s2">
      <title>2. Materials and Methods</title>
      <p>
        This is a retrospective study conducted at Dr Deenadayal’s ENT Care Centre which is a tertiary referral centre. All patients diagnosed laryngeal papillomatosis between January 2013 to December 2016 were included in the study. All patients were evaluated preoperatively with 70˚ and 90˚ rigid video laryngoscopy and flexible laryngopharyngoscopy, and derkay severity score noted. According to the Derkay staging system―in which the aerodigestive tract is divided into 25 subsites, each of which is given a score of 0 to 3 (0 = no lesion, 1 = surface lesion, 2 = raised lesion, 3 = bulky lesion (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Pre-operative objective voice analysis was done using PRAAT software. Voice of all the patients was recorded so as to compare the pre-op voice with that after the treatment. All voices were recorded following a standard procedure, both before and after treatment. The recorded voice sample included counting from 1 to 10, prolonged /a/, /o/ and /i/ vowels, and a paragraph in the language patient can read which was kept constant for all the patients. Maximum phonation time was noted by asking the patient to inhale as deeply as possible and sustain a steady vowel for as long as possible. This was repeated three times and the longest of the three measurements was taken. After the pre-operative assessment, the patients taken up for microlaryngeal surgery. Under general anaesthesia with the patient in Boyce’s position, Klein Saucer suspension laryngoscope was introduced. Operating microscope with objective lens of 400 mm was used to visualise the vocal cords. PROCISE LW laryngeal wand was first used to debulk the lesions. PROCISE MLW laryngeal wand was used to clear papillomas near the vocal cords. The power level was set to 6 for coblation and 3 for coagulation. Post operatively, each patient was given antibiotic and anti-inflammatory for 1 week, antacid for 1 month and absolute voice rest for 1 week followed by speech therapy and spirometry exercises. Patients were regularly followed up at interval of 1 week, 15
      </p>
      <fig id="fig1"  position="float">
        <label>
          <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>
        </label>
          </fig>
        <caption>
          <title>
            Anatomical Staging System as proposed by Derkay et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83187-ref3">3</xref>]
          </title>
        </caption>
        <table-wrap id="table_fig1" >
          <object-id pub-id-type="pii">
            <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>
          </object-id>
           
        </table-wrap>
        <p>days, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months. Assessment of vocal cords was done with 70˚ rigid video laryngoscopy at each visit. Stroboscopy and voice analysis was repeated 3 months after surgery, and pre-and post-operative findings were compared to quantify improvement in voice.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s3">
      <title>3. Results</title>
      <p>
        Seven patients were diagnosed with laryngeal papillomatosis from January 2013 to December 2016. Six patients were female while one was male ranging from 19 years to 60 years (mean age 45.4 years). The number of years with disease varied from 1 month to 15 years. All patients presented with change in voice. Four (Patient 1, 2, 3 and 4) out of seven the patients had undergone surgery for papillomatosis previously (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Preoperatively average derkay severity staging was 6.7, highest being 10 and lowest being 3. All the patients underwent coblation assisted resection of laryngeal papillomatosis. Three patients (Patient 1, 3 and 4) had excessive slough following the procedure requiring slough removal one-week post operatively. There were no complications noted perioperatively and postoperatively. Four patients had recurrence following surgery out of which 3 patients underwent repeat procedure using coblation while one patient was lost to follow up. These three patients did not show any recurrence following the repeat procedure with coblation on long term follow up (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> show pre and post operative laryngoscopic pictures following coblation assisted excision of the laryngeal papillomas.
      </p>
      <p>
        Voice analysis and stroboscopy was done after 3 months after surgery. In cases of recurrence, voice analysis was repeated after the second procedure. Change in acoustic parameters of voice after surgery are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. Voice analysis did not reveal much change in pitch and intensity of voice post operatively. There was a significant improvement noted in measures of perturbation i.e. jitter and shimmer. Improvement in jitter was more as compared to shimmer i.e. perturbation in pitch improved more than perturbation in intensity
      </p>
      <table-wrap id="table1" >
        <label>
          <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>
        </label>
        <caption>
          <title> Demographics of patients</title>
        </caption>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th align="center" valign="middle" >PATIENT</th>
                <th align="center" valign="middle" >AGE</th>
                <th align="center" valign="middle" >SEX</th>
                <th align="center" valign="middle" >TIME WITH DISEASE</th>
                <th align="center" valign="middle" >NUMBER OF PREVIOUS PROCEDURES</th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tr>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >3 months</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >3 times with cold instruments</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >47</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >15 years</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >2 times with cold instruments</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >1 year</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >2 times with cold instruments</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >15 years</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >1 time with cold instruments</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >3 months</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >None</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >2 years</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >None</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >1 month</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >None</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <table-wrap id="table2" >
        <label>
          <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>
        </label>
        <caption>
          <title> Recurrences following coblation</title>
        </caption>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th align="center" valign="middle" >Patient</th>
                <th align="center" valign="middle" >Derkay Severity Scoring</th>
                <th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of recurrences after coblation</th>
                <th align="center" valign="middle" >Time of recurrence after coblation</th>
                <th align="center" valign="middle" >Treatment for recurrence</th>
                <th align="center" valign="middle" >Current Status</th>
                <th align="center" valign="middle" >Duration of follow up</th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tr>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >None</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >No recurrence</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >1 year</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >1 month</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >Coblation</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >No recurrence</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >2 years</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >1 month</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >Coblation</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >No recurrence</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >1 year</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >6 months</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >Lost to follow up</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >Lost to follow up</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >Lost to follow up</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >None</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >No recurrence</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >1 year</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >None</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >No recurrence</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >6 months</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >1 month</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >Coblation</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >No recurrence</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >2 years</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <table-wrap id="table3" >
        <label>
          <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>
        </label>
        <caption>
          <title> Improvement in acoustic parameters of voice</title>
        </caption>
        <table>
          <tbody>
            <thead>
              <tr>
                <th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameter</th>
                <th align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-op</th>
                <th align="center" valign="middle" >SD*</th>
                <th align="center" valign="middle" >Post-op</th>
                <th align="center" valign="middle" >SD*</th>
                <th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage improvement</th>
                <th align="center" valign="middle" >p Value</th>
              </tr>
            </thead>
            <tr>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >Pitch (Hz)</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >236.06</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >106.01</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >208.63</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >50.09</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >11.62%</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >Intensity (dB)</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >61.31</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >12.62</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >62.30</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >8.27</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >1.60%</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >Shimmer (dB)</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >1.86</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.62</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.92</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.38</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >50.53%</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >Jitter (%)</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >5.94</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >4.06</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.813</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.77</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >86.30%</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >Harmonics to Noise Ratio</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >3.98</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >4.52</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >13.26</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >5.62</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >233%</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >MPT(seconds)</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >5.85</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >2.79</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >10.57</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >3.15</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >80.60%</td>
              <td align="center" valign="middle" >0.002</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p>*SD―Standard Deviation.</p>
      <p>after surgery. Harmonics to noise ratio increased by almost 3 times after surgery, from an average of 3.98 dB pre-operatively to 13.26 dB post-operatively. Maximum phonation time showed 80.6% increase after surgery. In all cases mucosal waves on stroboscopy was found to be normal post-operatively.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s4">
      <title>4. Discussion</title>
      <p>In 1976, Hirano described the vocal folds as a layered structure according to a body cover model. The cover consists of the overlying epithelium and superficial lamina propria. The body is formed by the vocalis muscle. Between these two layers is the transition zone composed of the intermediate (elastic) and deep (collagen) layers of lamina propria which together make up the vocal ligament. The preservation of the relationship between the cover, the transition zone and body is essential for favourable voice outcome postoperatively. Any injury to the vocal fold will result in scarring eventually compromising the quality of voice. Patients with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis may be subjected to repeated surgical procedures due to multiple recurrences, which increases the risk of vocal fold scarring.</p>
      <p>
        Controlled ablation (coblation) is a radiofrequency bipolar method of tissue destruction in which electric current runs through a steady flow of irrigating saline, resulting in polarization of the sodium ions causing local tissue destruction at the tip of the coblation wand. The coblation technique works at 60˚C as opposed to CO<sub>2</sub> laser that can heat charred tissue to temperatures greater than 400˚C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83187-ref4">4</xref>] .
      </p>
      <p>
        The risk of airway fire is reduced with the use of coblation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83187-ref5">5</xref>] . Coblation also avoids the potential complications of laser like scarring, stenosis and seeding of virus via laser plumes. It also results in less peripheral damage and inflammatory reaction than laser. Coblation wand combines suction, ablation and coagulation in one instrument unlike lasers and microdebriders, thus helps in providing a clear surgical field. Use of coblation was also found to result in less intraoperative bleeding [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83187-ref6">6</xref>] and reduced operative time [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83187-ref7">7</xref>] . The PROCISE LW laryngeal wand has a working length of 16.5 cm with a 45-degree angulation 3 cm off the handle and 15-degree angulation at the tip allowing optimal access to larynx. The shaft of the wand is malleable which can be used to adapt to the patient anatomy giving it an edge over the rigid microdebriders. The PROCISE MLW laryngeal wand has a working length of 19 cm with an angulation to 50-degree 3 cm off the handle and a 16-degree angulation at the tip allowing access to subglottis and trachea. Also shaft of the wand is ultra-slim (outer diameter is 2.8 mm) which improves the visualization of the field. Single wire electrode at the tip provides precise removal of small lesions.
      </p>
      <p>
        There have been various studies that have shown coblation to be a promising tool in the treatment of laryngeal papillomas but none of these studies have analysed the voice [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83187-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83187-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83187-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83187-ref10">10</xref>] . In our study, we analysed the voice pre and post operatively and found that there was significant improvement in jitter, shimmer and harmonics to noise ratio. Maximum phonation time also increased significantly. This indicates the vibratory characteristics of the vocal folds were maintained post operatively. Additional speech therapy post-operatively also helped in improving the voice quality of the patients.
      </p>
      <p>
        Study by A.S Carney et al. found that coblation resulted in longer periods between interventions as compared to CO<sub>2</sub> laser [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83187-ref7">7</xref>] . In our series, three patients showed recurrence one month post operatively with a derkay severity score of 2. These patients were immediately taken up for surgery. The repeat procedure was also done using coblation. Since the recurrences were small in size, complete clearance of the disease could be achieved. Long term follow up of these patients did not show any recurrence. (6)
      </p>
      <p>Post operatively stroboscopy was repeated and all cases were found to have a normal mucosal wave pattern indicating that the vocal fold architecture was maintained even after surgery. There was no vocal cord scarring even in cases that underwent a repeat procedure.</p>
      <p>Thus, with coblation satisfactory disease clearance and reduced frequency of recurrence can be achieved with a good voice quality.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s5">
      <title>5. Conclusion</title>
      <p>Coblation is a unique tool that can be used for suction, ablation as well as coagulation that can help in complete removal of papillomas without damaging the underlying architecture of the vocal cords, reduces the frequency of recurrence and also results in a good voice post-operatively. It may be used as an alternative to the current methods of treatment of laryngeal papillomas.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="s6">
      <title>Cite this paper</title>
      <p>
        Deenadayal, D.S., Naeem, N. and Bommakanti, V. (2018) Coblation: An Alternative to CO<sub>2</sub> Laser and Microdebrider for Laryngeal Papillomatosis. International Journal of Otolaryngology and Head &amp; Neck Surgery, 7, 47-54. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijohns.2018.72007
      </p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="scirp.83187-ref1">
        <label>1</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Goon, P., Sonnex, C., Jani, P., Stanley, M. and Sudhoff, H. (2008) Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis: An Overview of Current Thinking and Treatment. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 265, 147-151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-007-0546-z</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.83187-ref2">
        <label>2</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Carifi, M. and Napolitano, D. (2015) Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis: Current and Future Perspectives. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, 731-738. https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S81825</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.83187-ref3">
        <label>3</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Derkay, C.S., Malis, D.J., Zalzal, G., Wiatrak, B.J., Kashima, H.K. and Coltrera, M.D. (1998) A Staging System for Assessing Severity of Disease and Response to Therapy in Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis. Laryngoscope, 108, 935-937. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9628513</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.83187-ref4">
        <label>4</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Divi, V., Benninger, M., Kiupel, M. and Dobbie, A. (2012) Coblation of the Canine Vocal Fold: A Histologic Study. Journal of Voice, 26, 811.e9-811.e13. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0892199711001640</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.83187-ref5">
        <label>5</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Matt, B.H. and Cottee, L.A. (2010) Reducing Risk of Fire in the Operating Room Using Coblation Technology. Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, 143, 454-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2010.05.013</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.83187-ref6">
        <label>6</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Timms, M.S., Bruce, I.A. and Patel, N.K. (2007) Radiofrequency Ablation (Coblation): A Promising New Technique for Laryngeal Papillomata. The Journal of Laryngology &amp; Otology, 121, 28-30. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17040601https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215106003069</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.83187-ref7">
        <label>7</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Carney, A.S., Evans, A.S., Mirza, S. and Psaltis, A. (2010) Radiofrequency Coblation for Treatment of Advanced Laryngotracheal Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis. The Journal of Laryngology &amp; Otology, 124, 510. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20003595</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.83187-ref8">
        <label>8</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rachmanidou, A. and Modayil, P.C. (2011) Coblation Resection of Paediatric Laryngeal Papilloma. The Journal of Laryngology &amp; Otology, 125, 873-876. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21669019https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215111001253</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.83187-ref9">
        <label>9</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Carney, S. and Psaltis, A. (2004) Radiofrequency Coblation for the Treatment of Laryngotracheal Papillomas. Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, 131, 137. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0194599804008587</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="scirp.83187-ref10">
        <label>10</label>
        <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chouhan, A., Kulhari, M., Amisha, B. and Kasliwal, N. (2016) Microscopic Surgery with Coblation for the Treatment of Benign Laryngeal Lesions: A Case Report. 125-128.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>