Swyer-James-MacLeod Syndrome (SJMS) is a rare, acquired post-infectious condition characterised by emphysematous changes or bronchiectasis which may lead to fibrosis to cause pulmonary capillary bed destruction. Patients with severe lung disease presenting for anaesthesia are a challenge because intraoperative and postoperative respiratory complications are more common in them, and these may lead to prolonged hospital stay and increased mortality. Regional anaesthetic techniques are often used adjunctively for breast surgeries under general anaesthesia (GA), but there are limited reports on breast surgeries done solely under regional anaesthesia (RA). We describe a patient with SJMS who successfully underwent breast surgery under regional anaesthesia.

Written consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report.

The patient is a 51-year-old female with a history of Swyer-James-MacLeod Syndrome (SJMS) who required stereotactic hook-wire localization, wide excision of left breast micro calcifications. Her only surgical history was an uneventful laparoscopic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy earlier in the same year performed under combined spinal-epidural, for which she required postoperative intensive care monitoring. Although she was NYHA class 2, her recent lung function test was grossly abnormal: FEV1 1.04 L (46% predicted), FVC 1.97 L (76% predicted) and FEV/FVC ratio 53%. Her chest X-ray showed changes congruent with her diagnosis: hypoplastic, bronchiectatic left lung and bronchial wall thickening in the right lung (Figure 1).

She was planned for surgery under regional anaesthesia. Single shot paravertebral, medial and lateral pectoral nerve blocks were performed under conscious sedation with intravenous midazolam 1mg and fentanyl 50 mcg. She was first positioned prone and left T3 and T4 paravertebral spaces were located with ultrasound (Figure 2 and Figure 3). Paravertebral block was performed with a 50 mm Pajunk Sono Plex Stim cannula and Sonosite Edge HFL50x transducer in

the sagittal plane using out of plane technique. 100 mg lignocaine (5 mcg/ml adrenaline) and 50 mg ropivacaine in 10 ml were administered to each level. She was then positioned supine for medial and lateral pectoral nerve block with 8 ml of 200 mg lignocaine (5 mcg/ml adrenaline) under in-plane ultrasound guidance in the infraclavicular area.

Sedation was started at patient’s request with propofol target controlled infusion, Schneider mode at effect site concentration of 1.8 ng/ml. A 3 cm radial skin incision was made 18 minutes after the completion of regional anaesthesia. Planned wide excision proceeded smoothly with excellent surgical condition. Total surgical time was 20 minutes and patient recovered well enough for same-day discharge.

Swyer-James-MacLeod Syndrome (SJMS), which was first described in 1953 by Swyer and James, and further detailed by MacLeod, is a rare acquired condition secondary to viral bronchiolitis and pneumonitis in childhood [1] . The condition manifests as a post-infectious bronchiolitis obliterans characterized by emphysematous changes or bronchiectasis which may lead to fibrosis in both bronchioles and interalveolar septum, causing pulmonary capillary bed destruction [2] . Patients’ symptomology may range from asymptomatic with incidental diagnostic radiographical findings to severe symptoms, such as dyspnoea and recurrent pulmonary infections.

The anaesthetic considerations must be individualised, depending on the severity of lung involvement, comorbidities as well as type of surgical procedure. In severe cases, such as that in our patient, anaesthetic management parallels that of patients with obstructive lung disease [2] . Local anaesthesia, regional anaesthesia and central neuraxial anaesthesia should be used whenever possible. Care should be taken to avoid anaesthetising the phrenic nerve in patients with severe disease. As these patients are prone to baro- and volu-trauma, mechanical ventilation should be carefully set to avoid high airway pressures and large tidal volumes in cases when general anaesthesia cannot be avoided [3] .

In view of her underlying SJMS, regional anaesthesia was performed to avoid potential postoperative respiratory complications. An incision was to be made at the 0700 position of the lower inner quadrant of the left breast. The combination of single shot paravertebral block at T3 and T4 levels, as well as medial and lateral pectoral nerve blocks was chosen based on the knowledge of the anatomy of the breast. The breast is mainly innervated by the anterolateral and anteromedial branches of the thoracic intercostal nerves corresponding to T3 - T5 and these are being targeted by the paravertebral blocks. Supraclavicular nerves from the lower fibers of the cervical plexus provide innervation to the upper and lateral portions of the breast. Researchers believe sensation to the nipple derives largely from the lateral cutaneous branch of T4 [4] . Medial and lateral pectoral nerve blocks, also known as Pecs I block, were administered to incorporate coverage to pectoralis muscle which lies deep to the breast tissue.

A brief literature search of the MEDLINE database via Pubmed was carried out to review the types of RA performed for breast surgery. Articles were included (Table 1) if RA was performed on patients undergoing breast surgery, published in English and full texts were available. RA performed included paravertebral blocks, Pecs block, serratus plane block, intercostal blocks, superficial cervical plexus block, complete ante-thoracic block, thoracic and cervical epidural anaesthesia, as well as transverse abdominis plane blocks for operations with transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap reconstructions.

Several randomised controlled trials [15] [16] [20] [24] [28] , comparing the use of PVB and GA to that of GA alone in patients undergoing breast surgeries, showed significant reduction in post-operative pain, post-operative opioid consumption and occurrence of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients receiving PVB. A recent randomised control trial conducted by Versyck B [6] comparing the more novel Pecs II block to placebo block in patients undergoing mastectomy or lumpectomy with axillary node dissection showed significant reduction in pain scores and postoperative opioid use. Other positive outcomes from the review include reduction in length of hospital stay (LOS), increased cost-savings and an increase in satisfaction score. On the other hand, complications were much less frequently described, signifying a favourable risk-benefit ratio of RA. Use of RA avoided post-operative respiratory complications, such as atelectasis, pneumonia and consequently, respiratory failure, associated with use of GA, especially in our patient with SJMS. It also had advantages over thoracic epidural in its ability to maintain haemodynamic stability, preserve lower limb motor power and hence, to allow for same-day discharge.

R. Blanco, who developed the Pecs I and II blocks, came up with the description of the serratus plane block (SPB), which blocks primarily the thoracic intercostal nerves and provides complete analgesia to the lateral part of the thorax [33] . A prospective observational study [34] conducted to compare paravertebral and serratus plane block in patients scheduled for non-reconstructive breast surgery showed no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of quality of post-anaesthetic recovery, signifying that it could have been an alternative to the paravertebral block. When compared to PVB, Pecs block and SPB could eliminate the risk of posterior midline spread and subsequent hypotension. Pecs block and SPB may also be more advantageous for anticoagulated patients as according to ASRA’s evidence-based guidelines, the same precautions should be taken when placing thoracic PVB as when placing an epidural [35] . However, similar to Pecs II block, SPB targets the lateral cutaneous branches of the intercostal nerves and may not sufficiently provide coverage to our patient whose tumour was in the lower inner quadrant of the breast.

Regional techniques have frequently been performed as an adjunct to GA, but there have been less data on it being given as the sole anaesthesia for breast surgery. The use of a thoracic paravertebral block at T1-3 levels with 3 ml solution of 0.75% ropivacaine at each level was described in a left quadrantectomy with axillary lymph node dissection for infiltrating ductal carcinoma in a patient who is at a late stage of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. No other analgesia was given during the 110-min surgery and for 34 hours post-surgery [36] . Ultrasound-guided Pecs II block and internal intercostal plane block were given for excision of breast giant fibroadenoma in a patient who refused general anaesthesia. 10 and 20 mls of 0.375% ropivacaine was injected for Pecs I and Pecs II block respectively, followed by 10 mls of 0.375% ropivacaine injected for internal intercostal plane block, with propofol infusion given for sedation to the patient who tolerated 1.5 hours of surgical time [9] .

RA, either used alone or as an adjunct to GA, can also be recommended for well patients for the benefit it carries. Basic sciences studies and a retrospective review have suggested that breast cancer patients had better cancer outcomes if they received paravertebral blocks with GA compared to those who had received GA alone [26] , although this benefit has yet to be shown in recent studies [11] . A multicentre double-blinded randomised trial (https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/, NCT00418457) is currently underway to determine the rate of cancer recurrence or metastasis in breast cancer patients receiving either RA or GA. Large majority of studies have shown that regional technique reduces intraoperative use of opioids and post-operative pain [16] [37] [38] . A randomised controlled trial [39] with PVB and placebo in patients undergoing mastectomies have not shown that use of RA to be associated with less incidence of chronic pain. There was, however, less severe chronic pain in patients who received PVB, and they too, experienced better physical and mental health-related quality of life compared to patients who received placebo injections. Other benefits of giving RA with or without GA include lower incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting related to reduced usage of opioids [8] [40] [41] , improved patient satisfaction score [39] and reduction in length of hospital stay [22] [40] .

Regional anaesthesia has proven to be the safest approach in circumstances where GA would have carried a much higher risk. A patient with Eisenmenger’s syndrome had surgical resection of a carotid body tumour done successfully under continuous cervical plexus block and remifentanil infusion, avoiding GA and its associated haemodynamic complications [42] . A supraclavicular block as a sole anaesthetic technique for an elbow incision and drainage procedure for one of a pair of adult craniopagus twins is another example where RA is more ideal than GA. They would otherwise be subjected to unpredictable effects of anaesthetic crossover and potential difficult airway due to anatomy differences. [43] Simultaneous bilateral below-knee amputations were performed under ultrasound-guided combined inguinal femoral and subgluteal sciatic nerve blocks in a coagulopathic patient with chronic ischaemic heart disease [44] . Left below-knee amputation, which took 76 mins, was performed under ultrasound-guided left femoral nerve block and left subgluteal sciatic nerve block using 21 ml and 24 ml of local anaesthetic mixture (containing 1:1 ratio of 1% mepivacaine and 0.75% ropivacaine) respectively. Subsequently, similar blocks using a total of 47 ml of the same local anaesthetic mixture was performed for the right below-knee amputation. Sequential placement of the blocks before corresponding limb surgery allowed successful anaesthesia without local anaesthesia toxicity, and at the same time, avoiding the high risk of GA in this patient.

Apart from the patient’s medical condition and choice when considering method of anaesthesia, other practical issues include patient comfort and the ability to provide ideal operating conditions. RA can be combined with sedation to improve intra-operative patient comfort. However, gentle surgical manipulation is required and this may not be well-received by all surgeons. Consequences of potential complications resulting from RA have to be taken into consideration. In this particular patient, it would have been disastrous if a pneumothorax were to result from PVB in the only functional lung.

Regional block with sedation is a feasible anaesthetic option for patients going for breast surgeries and this can reduce perioperative respiratory risks dramatically in patients with severe lung pathology. In addition, it may also be recommended to well patients as RA may improve other aspects of postoperative recovery, such as better pain control, lower incidence of PONV, shorter length of stay, which may all indirectly increase cost savings. However, there are other considerations such as surgeon’s and patient’s acceptability before making RA the default technique for breast operations.

None.

None.

Xing, J.Y. and Thong, S.Y. (2018) Case Report of a Patient with Swyer-James-MacLeod Syndrome Undergoing Breast Surgery under Regional Anaesthesia and Review of Literature. Open Journal of Anesthesiology, 8, 66-79. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojanes.2018.83007