<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMMCE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4077</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmmce.2018.62012</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMMCE-82806</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Engineering</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  The Massive Sulfide Deposit of Siirt Madenk&#246;y, South-Eastern Turkey
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dicle</surname><given-names>Bal-Akkoca</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>H&amp;uuml;seyin</surname><given-names>&amp;Ccedil;elebi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Tatl&amp;amp;inodot;su Mahallesi, Akif &amp;amp;Idot;nan Soka&amp;amp;gbreve;&amp;amp;inodot;, &amp;amp;Idot;stanbul, Turkey</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Jeoloji M&amp;amp;uuml;hendisli&amp;amp;gbreve;i B&amp;amp;ouml;l&amp;amp;uuml;m&amp;amp;uuml;, M&amp;amp;uuml;hendislik Fak&amp;amp;uuml;ltesi, Firat Universitesi, Elazi&amp;amp;gbreve;, Turkey</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>06</day><month>03</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>155</fpage><lpage>178</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>9,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2018</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>3,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2018</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>6,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2018</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The Siirt Madenk
  &amp;ouml;y massive sulfide ore deposit has been in operation since 2005. With its approx. 39 Mt reserves (2.40% Cu), it represents the largest Cu deposit and the largest mining operation in the country (1.5 Mt ore/year). The thickness of the adjacent rocks is composed of olivine-pyroxenite basalts pillow lava, which is spilite, interchangeable ore lenses of chalcopyrite and pyrite is about 170 m and reaches a depth of 350 m. The mid-Eocene aged porphyritic, strongly altered spilites are locally interspersed with diabase and covered by conglomerates. The ores appear massive, stock work and disseminated. Main ore minerals are idiomorphic pyrite, cataclastic chalcopyrite and fine-grained magnetite. The geochemical composition of the Cu ores of the Siirt-Madenk
  &amp;ouml;y deposit shows in places high levels of Cu, Fe and S, as important trace elements, As, Ba, Co and Ti are listed. In relation to Clarke values, Se, Bi, Cu, Mo and Co are strongly enriched, while Na, K and Ca as well as their coherent trace elements Rb, Sr and Cd are depleted due to hydrothermal alteration. The elemental distribution is characterized by log-normal distribution, proportionality effect, high Cu/Ni ratio and significantly positive correlation between the element pairs MgO-Ni, Cr-Ni and Co/FeO-Co. The dependence of Cu and SO
  <sub>3</sub> contents and Cu/FeO, SO
  <sub>3</sub>/FeO ratios are to be interpreted as an indication of the common origin of Cu, Fe and S. In general, Cu, Zn, Pb and S content decrease with depth, whereas those of Fe
  <sub>3</sub>O
  <sub>4</sub> increase. The variograms of the ore distributions are characterized by hole effect, trend and zonal anisotropy, which reflect alternation of ores with host rocks and changes in elemental contents. The Siirt Madenk
  &amp;ouml;y deposit is attributable to Cu and Zn ratios of the Cu class of ophiolitic massive sulfide deposits. Due to the very high Cu/Pb and Cu/Zn ratios, it can be described as an analogous deposit of the mid oceanic ridge, for example comparable to ores of Galapagos Ridge. The Siirt Madenk
  &amp;ouml;y deposit is considered to be a syngenetic volcanogenic-exhalative massive sulfide ore deposit based on the results of the study. It belongs to the “Cyprus deposit type”. Similar deposits are K&#252;re and Ergani-Maden in Turkey, Ermioni in Greece and Outukumpu in Finland.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Siirt Madenk&amp;ouml;y</kwd><kwd> Massive Sulfide Ore Deposits</kwd><kwd> Cyprus Type</kwd><kwd> Geochemistry</kwd><kwd> Mineral Raw Materials</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><sec id="s1_1"><title>1.1. Geographical Location</title><p>Siirt Madenk&#246;y’s massive sulfide deposit is located in South-Eastern Turkey, approximately 45 km northeast of the historic provincial town of Siirt (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>), an important oil province in Turkey, with traces of ancient Upper Mesopotamian civilizations such as Assyrians, Urarteans, Persians and Ayyubids. The deposit can be reached from Siirt via a country road. The nearest railway Kurtalan is about 80 km west. The main body of the deposit is located at an altitude between 770 and 1290 m NHN [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref1">1</xref>] . The area has a continental climate with adequate vegetation (rainfall 638 mm/year) and temperatures between 43˚C (July) and −20˚C (February) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref2">2</xref>] . The population density 58 persons/km<sup>2</sup> is far below the national average (100 persons/km<sup>2</sup>). The population of the industrial poor area is predominantly active in agriculture.</p></sec><sec id="s1_2"><title>1.2. Historical overview</title><p>The mining activities in Siirt-Madenk&#246;y reach back to antiquity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref1">1</xref>] , but they are</p><p>not clearly documented in time. Old slag heaps and galleries occupy these activities. The first contemporary geological works in Siirt Madenk&#246;y were undertaken by the Institute of Mineral Research and Exploration of Turkey (MTA) in 1947. These were followed by detailed work [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref5">5</xref>] . In 1971, the MTA institute resumed work and described the deposit in detail for the first time [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref6">6</xref>] . This work was followed by feasibility studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref8">8</xref>] . The mining company was only added to copper ore or concentrate in the spring of 2005.</p><p>This article thoroughly discusses the deposit for the geochemical distribution of Cu, Pb, Zn, Fe (as Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>) and S components in order to gain new insights into their occurrence in the deposit, to assist in previous geological investigations, and to provide guidance on future work. For this the frequency distribution, correlation analysis and variogram calculation are used. Subsequently, a stock calculation is carried out by profile method in order to determine important economic parameters of the deposit. It should be noted that the data after commissioning of the deposit in 2005 were not included in this work. These are the subject of further research work, as they are predominantly relevant to the determination of reserves (see “Reserve calculation”) and this study was already completed.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Geological Background</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Regional Geology</title><p>The Siirt Madenk&#246;y region is located between metamorphic Bitlis massif in the north and marginal folds of the Arabian plate in the south. It consists of north-south Palaeozoic metamorphic rocks (mica schist and marbles), ophiolithic rocks of the Upper Cretaceous (peridotites, volcanic and mudstones) and the Miocene marginal folds of the Arabian plate (conglomerates and sandstones) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref9">9</xref>] . The boundaries between these series are always given by east-west almost parallel thrust tracks, which characterize the actual tectonics (see also [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref11">11</xref>] ). The ophiolithic series, also known as the South-East Anatolian Ophiolithic Belt, can be traced over a distance of about 700 km, from Hatay in the west to the Hakkarı on the Iranian border in the east. This series is regarded as the eastern continuation of the Cypriot Troodos massif and its raw material potential equalled with that of the Andes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref12">12</xref>] . It contains numerous massive sulfide deposits of the type Cyprus, of which Helezor and Ergani-Maden in Elazığ, Mizak and Karadere in Diyarbakır and Siirt Madenk&#246;y in Siirt are the most important [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref17">17</xref>] . The formation of these deposits is associated with alpine orogeny [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref18">18</xref>] , while [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref19">19</xref>] compares these with recent occurrences of mid-ocean ridges.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Geology of the deposit</title><p>The geology of the Siirt Madenk&#246;y deposit, as noted above, has rock series of two distinct sequences: these are Permian marbles of the Bitlis massif and spilite, diabase and mudstones of the ophiolitic series of alpine orogeny. This structure is called a tectonic window [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref20">20</xref>] .</p><p>The most common rocks of the deposit area are spilites, olivine pyroxenitic basalts, which occur mainly in the eastern and southeastern areas (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). They represent the oldest rock unit of the deposit, which are placed in the middle Eocene [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref8">8</xref>] . This greenish black, very fragile unit reaches a width of 450 m and is often interspersed with diabase veins. They are subdivided into dark and porphyritic (spotty) spilites [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref8">8</xref>] , which merge into each other. In the center of the unit they lead heavily altered pillow lava, which reach a diameter of 2.50 m. They sweep northeast-southwest and drop northwest at 50˚ - 60˚. Their contact with the other rock series is mostly determined by fractions. Their gas chambers are filled with calcite, quartz and zeolite. The well-developed alteration consists primarily of solidification, chloritization and sericitization. The mineralization is bound to these altered rock areas [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref21">21</xref>] .</p><p>The spilites show a clear almond structure and ophiolitic or diabase-like texture under microscope [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref20">20</xref>] . Their mineralogical composition consists mainly of slightly albitized and rarely idiomorphic plagioclases, as well as augite and mafic minerals such as magnetite, which is rare. The mafic minerals are mostly chloritized or sericitized. Their important secondary minerals are leucoxene and indingist.</p><p>Diabase occurs very rarely in the study area as passages in spilites and is younger. The surface diabase flows are mostly concentrated in the north and in the center of the deposit area (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Their color changes from dark green to light green according to the degree of kaolinization or propylitization (see also [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref8">8</xref>] ). They show a granular structure. Mineralogical they consist mainly of albite and augite. Incidentally, magnetite, hematite, rutile, ilmenite and quartz also occur.</p><p>In the west and northwest of the deposit area conglomerates are common. They are not graded [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref22">22</xref>] and show no stratification. Their transition to the neighboring rocks, for example to the mudstones, is gradual. In upper areas they carry volcanic pebbles, while in the lower areas they have recrystallised pebbles with round grains of pyrite and chalcopyrite. They carry fossils of Nimmulites sp and put them in Lutetium [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref8">8</xref>] .</p><p>The north-westerly piles (scree) form the youngest rock formation in the deposit. It consists of a mixture of the surrounding rock series and reaches at most a few m thicknesses. In addition, there are still mudstones, which occur in the form of thin horizons and predominantly appear in the north (see also [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref7">7</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref23">23</xref>] ). In addition, gypsum and breccia horizons can be observed in places.</p><p>In the Siirt Madenk&#246;y deposit, numerous perturbations of various dimensions and properties have emerged [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref8">8</xref>] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Here, the northwest-southeast interference extending, which are considered as a result of vertical fractures and block movements outweigh. These movements have largely led to the shift of the geological formations and the mineralization zones. In particular, the areas of the conglomerates have been subjected to strong local reductions. The terrain observations show that the fractures were created only after the mineralization.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Mineralogy</title><p>The mineralization in Siirt Madenk&#246;y is bound to the spilites according to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref6">6</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref8">8</xref>] , which have massive flow structures and lead cushion lava. These are particularly evident in the southwest of the deposit (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). The ore outbreaks are largely altered.</p><p>The mineralization in Siirt Madenk&#246;y constitutes a lenticular ore body extending northeast-southwest, consisting of numerous individual lenses of different dimensions at approximately 50˚ to the northwest (section A-A' of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0). The total thickness of the ore body reaches about 150 m. Its length is about 700 m, while its width varies between 100 and 300 m. In the ore body is a significant vertical zoning to determine. From the bottom (magnetite) to the top (pyrite), the following resource zones are similar, similar to those of the Cyprus type massive sulfide deposits:</p><p>Pyrite,</p><p>Pyrite + chalcopyrite,</p><p>Pyrite + chalcopyrite + sphalerite,</p><p>Pyrite + chalcopyrite + magnetite,</p><p>Magnetite.</p><p>Pyrite is more or less everywhere, while magnetite occurs only in the deeper part of the mineralization. This indicates a primary depth difference characteristic of hydrothermal deposits, as indicated by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref24">24</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref25">25</xref>] . The alteration of ore grades according to the depth in a deposit is an old fact of experience that some elements, such as Zn, increase in depth, or vice versa, such as Pb and Ag, which is why in old Pb mining, the occurrence of sphalerite as a “mining end” was viewed. This change in element contents with depth is interpreted as a consequence of the occurrence of higher temperature zones.</p><p>It is already macroscopically, without taking into account their genesis, to distinguish clearly massive, storied and impregnated mineralization. Of central importance is the massive mineralization common in lower areas of the deposit [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref8">8</xref>] . It is composed of almost pure pyrite, chalcopyrite or magnetite or all of them. Their metal contents are highly variable depending on the composition of the ore, so that in places 16% Cu, 48% S or 92% Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> reach (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). This ore is often surrounded by all-over ore impregnation, which consists of randomly distributed single ore minerals and low metal contents lead. This type of ore predominantly consists of chalcopyrite [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref8">8</xref>] and fills in places cracks and crevices of country rock, which results in the net-like stock work mineralization. This intersperses both types of ore and occurs mainly in the lower areas of the ore zone, which is typical for volcanic massive sulfide deposits.</p><p>The mineralogical composition of these ore grades is identical, and generally consists of sulfidic ore minerals. Pyrite is the most widely used sulfidic mineral with grain sizes of 2 - 3 mm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref20">20</xref>] . It is predominantly idiomorphic or hypidiomorphic, showing cataclastic texture and colloidal structure (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). Its cracks are filled with gangue minerals and are older than chalcopyrite, sphalerite</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Parameters of the frequency distributions of important elements in Siirt Madenk&#246;y (compiled from data after [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref8">8</xref>] )</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Element wt%</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Samp. n</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Min. x<sub>min</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Max. x<sub>max</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Average x<sub>a</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Standard dev. s</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variation coeff. v</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mod m<sub>o</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Median m<sub>e</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Skewness g</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Excess e</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu Pb Zn *Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1369 55 330 353 904</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20 0.50 0.50 20.00 20.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.60 4.20 13.11 92.55 48.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.23 1.08 2.60 42.91 33.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.33 0.57 2.14 14.88 6.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >104 32 82 35 20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75 0.74 1.04 35.00 36.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.29 0.97 1.98 40.08 33.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+1.90 +3.20 +2.08 +0.56 −0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+ 4.53 +15.52 +4.96 −0.35 −0.71</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*Fe analysed as magnetite (Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>).</p><p>and magnetite. He leads ilmenite and magnetite inclusions in places [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref8">8</xref>] . Occasionally pyrite from converted pyrrhotite can also be observed.</p><p>Magnetite is the second most abundant mineral after pyrite and increases in depth to pure magnetite (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(a)). It is mainly idiomorphic or hypidiomorphic with pyrite and chalcopyrite. Its grain sizes reach a diameter of 0.30 mm. Rarely does he appears as a lamb. At margins he is often martitized or rarely converted into leucoxene. Its ilmenite, rutile and pyrrhotite inclusions are common [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref20">20</xref>] .</p><p>With pyrite and magnetite, cataclastic copper gravel also occurs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). It is fine-grained, marginally limonitized, shows chalcocit and coveline transitions. Occasionally, sphalerite inclusions can be seen. Incidentally, numerous other oxides, hydroxides, sulphates and carbonates can be found. These are mainly sphalerite, galena, marcasite, pyrrhotite, bornite, coveline, chalcocite, linseed and Fahlerz. Quartz, chlorite, barite, siderite and carbonates must be listed as gangues [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref20">20</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Material and Methods</title><p>The basis of this study is the analytical data of the cores from Siirt Madenk&#246;y. For the detailed statistical, geostatistical investigations and reserve calculations approx. 2000 analysis values of the 49 wells drilled by the MTA institute on the deposit until 1982 of the total of 61 deep wells (about 17.000 m) were used. The average core output is 65%. Some computationally determined important statistical parameters of respective components are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. It can be seen that Cu and Zn are the most dispersed. This is shown by their high coefficients of variation (v = 104 and 82%, respectively). Due to the very low and therefore partly inaccurate analysis values of all components, a lower limit value (min. = cut off), which could be mined, was used (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, column 3). Thus, the number of analysis was reduced (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, column 2), but the mean values of 2.23% Cu, 1.08% Pb, 2.60% Zn, 42.91% Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> and 33.10% S are more realistic. On the other hand, extremely high values according to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref26">26</xref>] were checked for outliers and switched off (mean &#177; 4 standard deviations), which did not belong to the population. For the evaluation of the data the methods of the frequency distribution, correlation analysis and the location-dependent variables (variograms) were applied. These are the analytical values of the 6 representative samples from 4 different core drillings for the geochemical trace element studies. The determination of the main and trace elements in ore samples was carried out by X-ray fluorescence analysis on powder tablets at the TU Berlin, as the orodispersible tablets were not suitable because of high S contents. The measurable results of the samples analyzed on 39 elements are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> (see Geochemistry), whereby the contents of the elements Cs, Hg, Th, Tl and U were below the detection limit. Experience has shown that the relative error of these analytical methods, depending on the element, is between &#177;3% (Cr, Ni) and 10% (Na, Mg).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Geochemistry</title><p>Mineralogical investigation methods are not sufficient to separate Cu ores of different origin from each other with sufficient accuracy. For this reason, geochemical investigation methods are used in addition.</p><p>The chemical composition of the ores is of particular importance for the valuation of a deposit. It can give important clues to its genesis, facilitate the processing of the ores and gain valuable elements. An overview of the chemistry of the ores of Siirt Madenk&#246;y, compared to the similar deposit Ergani-Maden, is given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><p>The geochemical analyses of copper ore samples from the Siirt Madenk&#246;y deposit show a moderate degree of mineralization, averaging 1.33% Cu (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). The contents of all main elements vary very much. The high levels of FeO (31.83%) and SO<sub>3</sub> (27.62%) indicate high magnetite and pyrite concentrations. Na does not appear in any of the investigated ore samples in clearly detectable concentrations, while K has been detected in only 2 samples. Also Ca and Mg are very impoverished. This may be related to the basic character of the rocks and</p><table-wrap-group id="2"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Composition of Cu ore from Siirt Madenk&#246;y and its relation to Ergani-Maden [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref27">27</xref>] </title></caption><table-wrap id="2_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Drilling Sample no.</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >M-19 208</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >210</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >M-36 209</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >290</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >M-56 204</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >M-65 209</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Arithm. averages</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Siirt Madenk&#246;y</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ergani-Maden, n = 22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oxides, wt%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SiO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.98</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FeO<sup>1</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MgO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.83</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CaO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.73</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl<sup>2</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sub>2</sub>O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TiO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SO<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.87</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BaO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.005</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sum<sub>(Oxydes)</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.98</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.002</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Minor el., ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ag</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >As</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >215</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1575</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >554</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >781</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Br</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Co</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >344</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >307</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >612</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >406</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >201</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >140</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >335</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >283</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >615</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ga</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >998</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,061</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >662</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >551</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >690</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >111</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >264</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >148</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Se</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="2_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sn</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >72</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >6</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >27</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >634</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >V</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >119</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >141</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >W</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Element ratios</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FeO/TiO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >328</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >680</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3260</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1520</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >982</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >231</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pb/Zn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu/Ni</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1175</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1292</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >527</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >760</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Co/Ni</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bdl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><p><sup>1</sup>Total ironoxide as FeO; <sup>2</sup>bdl: Below dedection limit.</p><p>the hydrothermal alteration. The concentrations of valuable materials, such as those of Ag, Pb and Zn are very low, which is also to be expected due to the rarity of galena and sphalerite. In general, Siirt Madenk&#246;y’s Cu ores are poor in trace elements. Significantly high enrichments in relation to their Clarke values show Bi (217 times), Co (13 times), Cu (241 times), Mo (50 times), and Se (363 times), with As (0.16%) and Ba (10, 25%) sometimes reach high concentrations (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The high fluctuations of the components are due to the different types of ore.</p><p>Numerous minor and trace elements can be replaced by the predominant minerals such as pyrite, chalcopyrite, magnetic gravel, galena, sphalerite and magnetite. The determination of the actual concentrations of the investigated trace elements in the individual mineral phases requires single-mineral analyses, which will be the subject of further research.</p><p>There is no significant relationship between SiO<sub>2</sub> contents and the contents of the main components or trace elements analysed (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The concentration of the plurality of elements is opposite to that of the SiO<sub>2</sub>. This means the displacement of the silicates by sulfide or oxides. In contrast, MgO, TiO<sub>2</sub>, Ni, and V show a marked dependence on Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, which is related to the diadochiene relationships between these elements in pyroxenes and mica. Despite the distribution of chalcopyrite and pyrite, FeO has no clear relation to Cu and SO<sub>3</sub>, which can be explained by different modal conditions of magnetite, pyrite and chalcopyrite. However, Cu and SO<sub>3</sub> levels are parallel to each other and to those of Co and Se. This means that Cu, Co, and Se are chalkophilically bound and that Se has largely replaced S. In addition, contents of Ba, Pb and Sr are significantly related due to the similar ionic radii (0.137, 0.124 and 0.112 nm) and diadochiene relationships and indicate their hydrothermal origin.</p><p>Also, the ratios of certain oxides or elements provide important information. For example, the FeO/TiO<sub>2</sub> ratio of about 127 for basic rocks is high, possibly related to hydrothermal alteration, that is, Ti removal. The ratio of Cu to Ni (633) is extremely high compared to that of the magmatic sulfide deposits of basic rocks (about 10) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref28">28</xref>] . In contrast, that of Cu/S (0.12) is lower, suggesting pyritic power.</p><p>The comparison of the average analytical values of the Siirt Madenk&#246;y copper ore samples with those of the Ergani-Maden deposit shows a certain similarity of both deposits (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). For example, the concentrations of Cu, FeO and SO<sub>3</sub> are very high. The deposit Siirt Madenk&#246;y is compared to Ergani-Maden Cu poorer (see also [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref8">8</xref>] ). The higher FeO and SO<sub>3</sub> contents in Siirt Madenk&#246;y indicate rich magnetite or pyrite mineralization, leading to low levels of SiO<sub>2</sub>, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and MgO. The ores of Siirt Madenk&#246;y, on the other hand, contain numerous trace elements such as As, Ba, Bi, Mo, Pb, Se and Zn in higher concentrations than Ergani-Maden (compare [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref29">29</xref>] ).</p><p>Massive sulfide deposits can be classified with special features in mind [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref30">30</xref>] . These are, for example, metal contents, age and country rock type. Also, the method of the Cu ratio (CR = 100Cu/(Cu + Zn)) and the Zn ratio (ZR = 100 Zn/(Zn + Pb)) is an important definition factor for distinguishing types of deposits such as Cu and Zn types [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref31">31</xref>] . Since it starts from metal contents, it is often used. At the Siirt Madenk&#246;y deposit, this factor indicates an average of 79 Cu and 81 Zn ratios for a Cu type Siirt Madenk&#246;y deposit (Cu ratios = CR &gt; 60), as shown by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref32">32</xref>] . These values are indicative of Cyprus type massive sulfide deposits and indicate saturation of the ore resolutions at Cu and Zn. For Siirt Madenk&#246;y this means, for example, the Zn saturation of the pyrites and the chlorides by the hydrothermal alteration. This is the case for the low-Pb massive sulfide deposits of the Cyprus type [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref31">31</xref>] .</p><p>The distributions of the mean values of Cu, Pb, Zn and Fe of the forty-nine core drillings are shown in the concentration triangles of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b). It can be seen that Cu is most concentrated relative to Pb and Zn (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a)), while the Pb/Zn ratios remain approximately the same. As a result, the Siirt Madenk&#246;y deposit, as defined by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref33">33</xref>] , is assigned to the Cu type of bulk sulfide deposits, which is consistent with the result of the Cu ratio [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref32">32</xref>] . This is associated with the ophiolitic country rocks of the Cyprus type massive sulfide deposits [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref34">34</xref>] , as indicated by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref17">17</xref>] and suggesting very low levels of TiO<sub>2</sub> and P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> as an indication of mid-ocean ridges. Hereby, a Co/Ni ratio of 0.29 to 1.97 is emphasized for massive sulfide deposits with serpentinitic country rocks and for those with basaltic values of 1.09 to 8 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref35">35</xref>] . This ratio is between 6.7 and 44 in Siirt Madenk&#246;y in the analysed ore samples, which is much higher.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b) shows the ratio of oxidic (e.g. magnetite) and sulfidic ores (e.g. pyrite and chalcopyrite), so that the average contents of Cu, Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>, and pyrite in the wells are very different. This reflects the distribution of rich local ore concentrations and poor ore or impregnation ores. This also illustrates the supremacy of the S over Cu and Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> (ignoring the non-magnetic Fe), where S has low scattering, which means extensive or relatively regular occurrence of the sulfidic ores (not shown, see Figures 7(b) and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref32">32</xref>] ). Terrain observations, mineralogical composition of the ores and the microscopic findings, such as those of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, also support these views.</p><p>The <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> shows the position of the deposit Siirt Madenk&#246;y in the Cu-10Pb-Zn triangle according to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref36">36</xref>] . In it are shown for comparison recent mineralization from the different oceanic environments. It can be seen that the massive sulfide deposit Siirt Madenk&#246;y is characterized by average Cu/10Pb and Cu/Zn ratios. The location of the representative point (SM) shows the area of the Cu class of massive sulfide deposits [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref30">30</xref>] . This can be achieved, for example, with the mineralization of the Galapagos Spreading Center (GAL), the Middle Oceanic Ridge (MOR), the Ergani-Maden (EM) and K&#252;re (Mağaradoruk, KM) massive</p><p>sulfide deposit, but with relatively higher Pb-Zn. Maintain, compare, and differ significantly from the Kuroko deposits (back-arc basin). As a result, the Siirt Madenk&#246;y deposit is considered to be one of the slow-spreading ridges massive sulfide deposits [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref37">37</xref>] . This is also supported by the elemental contents of <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref28">28</xref>] ).</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Statistical and geostatistical Researches</title><sec id="s4_2_1"><title>4.2.1. Frequency Distribution</title><p>From <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> it can be seen that the data are characterized in part with pronounced scattering. This is particularly noticeable for Cu and Zn contents, which are due to irregular mineralization, for example due to different ore grades requiring denser sampling.</p><p>The frequency distributions of individual components, with the exception of S and Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>, are normally distributed, as their mathematically determined parameters show in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. Their distribution images are left asymmetric or show positive slopes (mean &gt; median &gt; mod) and bulges (excess &gt; 3).</p><p>As an example, the frequency distribution of the mean Cu, Zn and S contents of the holes are shown on the <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(a). The positive slopes of the distributions of all 3 illustrated elements, the Cu, Zn and S, by the accumulation of data below the mean (left asymmetric) to express. This points to the poor ore, this means the low Cu, Zn and S contents indicate that the ore impregnations and storied ores are more widespread than the massive ores. Thus, the deposit Siirt Madenk&#246;y is to be designated as a type of pain, which also coincides with the field observations (see also [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref8">8</xref>] ).</p><p>In contrast, their logarithmic distributions are characterized by the approximately symmetrical accumulation of the analysis values around the mean value of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(b). This is to be interpreted as a log-normal distribution of the analysis values, whereby the S-distribution tends to negative skewness and thus indicates richness type (pyritic power). The log-normal distribution of the elements in rocks and ores is indicative of magmatic differentiation and bonding of the elements to certain minerals, such as copper gravel [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref38">38</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref39">39</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref40">40</xref>] . These results also apply in general to element distributions in the individual holes according to depth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref32">32</xref>] (see also <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(b) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0).</p><p>Frequency distributions of the Cu, Pb and Zn contents show positive (pointed) curves (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>), while those of the S and Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> are slightly negative (flat). The peak distribution is mainly due to a mineral as a consequence of the elemental bonding [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref41">41</xref>] . This means, for example, that Cu is bound almost exclusively to chalcopyrite, Pb to galena and Zn to sphalerite. In contrast, S is distributed on chalcopyrite and pyrite, Fe on chalcopyrite, pyrite and magnetite. Their shallow distributions reflect mineral phases or ore composition and confirm site observations and microscopic findings.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2_2"><title>4.2.2. Correlation Analysis</title><p>In Siirt Madenk&#246;y, there are no significant interelement correlations (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). This means that there was no saturation of the elements in the deposit. From <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> it can be seen that the chalcophilic elements Cu-Zn, Cu-S and Zn-Pb correlate significantly positively with each other, while Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> correlates negatively with S. It can be deduced that as a result of hydrothermal formation processes, e.g. occur due to the secondary depth difference, sulfidic and oxidic ores in opposite directions. While sulphidic ores, such as pyrite, concentrate in the upper regions of the deposit, oxidic ores, e.g. As magnetite, in lower layers of the mineralization (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(a)). Accordingly, the high Cu and S contents counteract the depth, which causes pyrite concentration. However, this relationship of the analysed elements to the deposit depth is highly variable. Here, different depth horizons occur, where depending on the depth sulfide (top) or oxidic ores (below) are bound, which are found in the field as ore lenses. However, the Cu dependence on the drilling depth is not significant. It decreases where Fe occurs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(a)).</p><p>Also noteworthy is the horizontal distribution of the average ore grades. They decrease from the northwest of the ore body to the southeast, so that, for example, the average Cu content of about 5% (hole M-80) to less than 1% (hole M-56) goes back (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>The best positive correlation among the analysed element pairs in the holes is a correlation coefficient of r = 0.70 between Zn and Pb contents of the M-35 well (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(b)), which is to be considered as a consequence of hydrothermal processes. However, this relationship is variable in the deposit. The regularities between element pairs may have been disturbed by hydrothermal alteration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref21">21</xref>] , which has led, for example, to the dilution or displacement of elements in ore and rock. In contrast, the course of the Cu/Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> ratios and Cu contents is linearly positive (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(c)). This is because Cu has more concentrated in the deposit relative to Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>, and high Cu contents correspond to relatively low Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> contents.</p><p>For the ore grade in a deposit and application of geostatistical methods, the proportionality effect is an important factor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref42">42</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref43">43</xref>] . In Siirt Madenk&#246;y, a significant (r = 0.32) proportionality effect occurs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(d)). It can be concluded that the coefficient of variation (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) is constant (see also [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref43">43</xref>] ). This means that it will not be easy to obtain a constant average ore grade during</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Correlation coefficients of the investigated element pairs in ore (n = 2203). Significant correlation coefficients at the 99% confidence for F &gt; 300: |r| &gt; 0.15</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cu</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>mining. This requires the application of the comprehensive and expensive universal rigging in the reserve calculation.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2_3"><title>4.2.3. Structure analysis (variograms)</title><p>A structural analysis in the Siirt Madenk&#246;y deposit can be carried out on the basis of the absolute variograms, since the ore zones are approximately homogeneous and the proportionality effect is not pronounced. This means that the variograms of the rich zones and the zones of the smelling will be similar. The log-normal variogram type can lead to high erratic errors related to the log-normal distribution of Cu contents.</p><p>For the analyses, the vertical variograms of the Cu in the selected drillings (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(b)) and horizontal variograms in the northeast-southwest and northwest-southeast directions were calculated (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(c) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(d)). The calculated variograms are assigned to the spherical variogram model. The general formula for this is</p><p>γ ( h ) = c 0 + c 1 ( 1.5 h/a − 0.5 h 3 /a 3 ) (1)</p><p>Herein mean</p><p>c<sub>0</sub>: nugget effect (estimation error, %),</p><p>c<sub>1</sub>: variance of the analysis values (% 2),</p><p>h: increment in m and,</p><p>a: threshold (optimal sample or well spacing) in m.</p><p>The variograms examined in the Siirt Madenk&#246;y deposit show an optimal sample spacing of approximately 5 m for all elements (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(b)). This means that the samples are no longer dependent on each other from this distance. The nugget effect c<sub>0</sub> varies according to the element and the drilling due to the irregular ore distribution. In general, they are below 2%<sup>2</sup> for all investigated elements and are considered normal for a copper deposit, whereas for Cu variograms, as in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(a), higher values are also found (see also [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref32">32</xref>] ). The sill c<sub>1</sub>, as the statistical variance of the sample values, is variable. This is due to the sometimes strongly varying ore contents of massive, storied and impregnated mineralization.</p><p>The calculated variograms also give indications of ore-host rock conditions, such for example change storage (hole effect). Some variograms indicate a pronounced alternating storage of the poor or rich ore zones, i.e. ore lenses, with the bedrock down to the depth, as reflected in the wavelike structure of the variograms (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(a)).</p><p>However, some drillings show an increase in depth variogram values (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(b)). This applies to all investigated elements in individual holes, as shown in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref32">32</xref>] . The increase in variogram values in one direction, as here for example, with depth, i.e. “the trend”, means the increase of ore grades in the given direction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref42">42</xref>] . This also confirms the correlation of the ore grades with the drilling depth (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(b)). This means that the mean contents depend on the step size h [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref43">43</xref>] . For geostatistical investigations, this means that, in theory, no simple</p><p>kriging is to be used for reserve calculation in the deposit. Instead, more sophisticated methods, such as universal kriging, must be used [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref44">44</xref>] . An alternative would be the decomposition of the orebody into parts of approximately homogeneous ore grades with sufficient numbers of samples.</p><p>Variograms also give indications of the structure of the entire deposits. In the Siirt Madenk&#246;y deposit, variograms in northeast-southwest and northwest-southeast directions were calculated from the mean grades of the Cu, Zn, and S to determine structural properties of the orebody, such as trend and zonality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref32">32</xref>] . The determined variograms show a clear alternation of the ores in a northeast-southwest direction for Cu distribution (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(c)). In contrast, there is a slight trend from northwest to southeast (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(d)). Their nugget effects come close to the variograms in the selected wells with values of approximately 1.5%<sup>2</sup> (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(a), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(b)). However, they have lower thresholds. This means that the mineralization is more horizontal regularly than in depth. The threshold, e.g. the optimum drilling distance is variable and is estimated at about 150 m. This is approximately the same for the two computed directions, while their thresholds differ significantly (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(c) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(d)). This can be explained by a pronounced zonal anisotropy, which is due to the interlacing of different types of ore [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref42">42</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref44">44</xref>] .</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Reserve calculation</title><p>The Siirt Madenk&#246;y massive sulfide deposit is an important source of raw material for Turkish mining. It is one of Turkey’s major copper deposits, which is currently under mining in Kastamonu and &#199;ayeli near Rize. Similar Cu deposits Ergani-Maden/Elazığ and Murgul/Artvin, are already mined.</p><p>The Siirt Madenk&#246;y deposit has been extensively investigated by MTA. In the 70s of the last century, a total of 61 deep holes were drilled down to 450 m (M-29) depth and created numerous trenches. The holes are arranged according to a drilling grid and perpendicular down. The drilling distances are on average 50 m. The core drilling output is 65% on average. The reason for this low core output is the widespread alteration and the archbreccia. In total, over 2000 core samples have been withdrawn, of which</p><p>2038 on Cu,</p><p>330 on Zn,</p><p>337 on Pb,</p><p>905 on S, and</p><p>1178 on Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>.</p><p>analysed and continuously tested for their density and humidity. The average dry density of the ores is 3.5 t/m<sup>3</sup>, which was also used in the reserve calculation. For a thorough investigation of the deposit these basics are sufficient. In addition there are the numerous slot samples from tunnels and graves.</p><p>For reserve calculation, the method of vertical parallel cuts was selected (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>). The profile method is suitable for the lenticular orebody and the MTA drill grid. In addition, the storage device can be represented geometrically well by this method. As an example, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0 shows the location and distribution of the mineralization in the vertical direction.</p><p>The total reserves Q has been constructed on the basis of the MTA drill program (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>) carried out by the MTA until 1984 at the University of Firat according to the general formula,</p><p>Q total = L ⋅ ∑ i = 1 n F i n − 1 ⋅ ρ [ t ] (2)</p><p>determined [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref32">32</xref>] . In that mean,</p><p>L: length of the worship [m],</p><p>F<sub>i</sub>: average mineralized area of two profiles [m<sup>2</sup>],</p><p>n: number of vertical cuts, and</p><p>ρ: density of ore [3.5 t/m<sup>3</sup>].</p><p>Here, the marginal quantities of reserves by cone formula,</p><p>q = 1 / 3 . F . h . ρ [ t ] (3)</p><p>where F is the base area [m<sup>2</sup>], h is the height of the cone [m] and ρ is the density of the ore [t/m<sup>3</sup>].</p><p>The calculations showed a reserve of 14.2 million tonnes (safe and likely). The recyclable material results in 288,000 t Cu (2.01%), 78,000 t Zn (0.54%) and 27,000 t Pb (0.20%). These supplies are divided into approximately 13 million tonnes through mining operations, and exploration wells are exploring safe reserves estimated at approximately 1.3 million tonnes by geological assumptions (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>). These reserves, calculated by the profile method, were checked for correctness by the triangular prism method (14.8 Mt) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref32">32</xref>] . These stocks and metal grades are also in good agreement with those of the 15 million tonnes reported by MTA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref8">8</xref>] .</p><p>It should be added that the Siirt Madenk&#246;y deposit was further intensively explored after its commissioning in 2005. The number of deep wells has been increased to 74 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref45">45</xref>] . The ore body was examined 241 times in total by control drilling, 2 new galleries were set up and numerous investigations were carried out [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref46">46</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref47">47</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref48">48</xref>] . This increased total reserves to 39.8 Mt, with a mean Cu content of 2.40%. Of these, 31.1 Mt are considered to be safe, 6.4 Mt as probable and 2.2 Mt as possible supplies. The results of this exploration work could not be included in this study, as they were solely inventory investigations, constantly changing, and this study had already been completed.</p><p>The wavy plate-shaped ore body is located according to previous geoscientific investigations at an altitude between 1160 and 1332 m and falls with about 50˚ to the north [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref32">32</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref48">48</xref>] . The ore is mined in a process combination in opencast mining and civil engineering (partial-load fracture) with a capacity of 1.5 Mt/a [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref45">45</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref47">47</xref>] . The overburden/ore ratio is approximately 77/1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref48">48</xref>] in open pit mining. In spite of its fine adhesion (&lt;53 μm) saleable Cu and S concentrates are extracted economically from the extracted ore [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref49">49</xref>] . In 2012, approximately 46,800 t of Cu concentrate were produced with a Cu content of 20% - 22% (&lt;2.7% Zn). In the same year, the annual production of the pyrite concentrate was 89,000 t with an S content of 44% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref49">49</xref>] . At the time, about 500 people worked in the mine [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82806-ref45">45</xref>] . In 2016, the mine suffered major damage from landslides.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusions</title><p>The synthesis of Siirt Madenk&#246;y’s genetic processes, their geological interpretation, present results and comparisons with similar deposits indicate that Siirt Madenk&#246;y is a syngenetic, volcanogenic-exhalative massive sulfide deposit. It belongs to the “deposit type Cyprus”. The main indications are the chloritization and sericitization, which are limited to the recumbent, and the absence of clastic sediments, which bear their unmistakable resemblance to those of the deposit type Cyprus. The undercutting of the ground ore impregnating ores and the collomorphic mineralization accompanied by framboidal pyrite formation, which reflects colloidal precipitation, may be added as further features of this type of deposit. Furthermore, the occurrence of Fe-rich sulfides such as pyrite and magnetic gravel, the high levels of trace elements Cr, Ni and Co and low to Zn and Pb are emphasized. The formation of valeriite in the chalcopyrite corresponds to approx. 200 m sea depth and a temperature of approx. 350˚C.</p><p>It is characteristic for the low-Pb type massive sulfide deposits of the Cyprus type that Cu is very enriched in relation to Pb and Zn at almost constant Pb/Zn ratios. This is the case in Siirt Madenk&#246;y and means the Zn saturation of the pyrites and chlorides by the hydrothermal alteration. This is also consistent with the high result of the Cu ratio. Accordingly, the Siirt Madenk&#246;y deposit is classified as a Cu class of massive sulfide deposits. This is related to the ophiolitic country rocks of the Cyprus-type massive sulfide deposits, where the very low levels of TiO<sub>2</sub> and P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> indicate the mid-ocean ridge formation environment.</p><p>In light of these findings, Siirt Madenk&#246;y’s massive sulfide deposit is comparable to recent massive sulfide mineralization from the oceanic environment. Due to the very high Cu/Pb and Cu/Zn ratios, it can be characterized as an analogous deposit of the mid oceanic ridge, this means back-arc-basin. It differs from the deposits of the Kuroko and Besshi type due to their high Cu/Pb and low Zn/Pb ratios. The analytical values of the ores of Siirt Madenk&#246;y partly correlate well with those of the ores from the “spreading-ridge-area”, being comparable to ores of Galapagos Ridge. These implications and the association of ophiolites, tholeiite basaltic volcanics, and pillow lava with mineralization make the Siirt Madenk&#246;y deposit one of the slow spreading ridge deposits.</p><p>The above geochemical results of the present study corroborate the thesis on the “volcanogenic-exhalative” genesis of the Siirt Madenk&#246;y deposit. Similar deposits are K&#252;re and Ergani maggots in Turkey, Ermioni in Greece and Outukumpu in Finland.</p><p>Due to its economic importance and recent history, the Siirt Madenk&#246;y deposit is an important research object. The details of deposit geology, patrology and mineralogy of the spilites have not yet been explored. Detailed geochemical, electron microscopic and isotopic geochemical investigations on ore and minerals can provide valuable knowledge. These can be important, for example, for further exploration, clarification of existing questions and making comparisons. Analysis of fluid inclusions and radiometric age determination could help to clarify the educational milieu and to answer open questions such as the age of magmatism, mineralization, and adrenal alteration.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We would like to express our sincere thanks to the Director General of MTA, Dipl.-Ing. M. &#220;zer, for the use of archive material in Ankara. Our special thanks go to Prof. Dr. Ing. K.-H. Jacob (TU-Berlin), who enabled us to use the laboratory facility of the Deposit Institute. We sincerely thank the colleagues of the Geology Department, namely Messrs. A. Sağıroğlu and M. İnce&#246;z, Fırat University, Elazığ/Turkey for their numerous suggestions and discussions that have contributed to the completion of this work.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Bal-Akkoca, D. and &#199;elebi, H. (2018) The Massive Sulfide Deposit of Siirt Madenk&#246;y, South-Eastern Turkey. Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, 6, 155-178. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmmce.2018.62012</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.82806-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Y&amp;ouml;n</surname><given-names> R. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2013</year>)<article-title>Siirt Madenk&amp;ouml;y Copper Field</article-title><source> Mining Turkey</source><volume> 2</volume>,<fpage> 28</fpage>-<lpage>33</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Türkiye Istatistik Kurumu (2017) Official Statistic Portal of Turkish Government.  
http://www.resmiistatistik.gov.tr/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chazan, W. (1947) Bitlis-&amp;Scedil;irvan-Madenk&amp;ouml;y pirit-malahit-azurit-kalkopirit yata&amp;gbreve;&amp;inodot;. Report to MTA-Institute, Ankara, 17 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Borchert, H. (1958) Türkiye’de inisiyal ofiyolitik magmatizmaya ait krom ve bak&amp;inodot;r cevheri yataklar&amp;inodot;. Unpubl. Report to MTA-Institute 102, Ankara, 141-156.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">van der Kaaden, G. (1962) Siirt Kuzeybat&amp;inodot;s&amp;inodot; ve &amp;Scedil;irvan‘&amp;inodot;n do&amp;gbreve;usunda bak&amp;inodot;r istik&amp;scedil;aflar&amp;inodot;. Unpubl. Report to MTA-Institute, Ankara, 2891.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">&amp;Ccedil;alg&amp;inodot;n, R. (1978) Siirt Madenk&amp;ouml;y bak&amp;inodot;r yata&amp;gbreve;&amp;inodot;n&amp;inodot;n jeolojisi ve mineralizasyonu. Unpubl. Report to MTA-Institute, Ankara, 5651.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Outokumpu (1981) Madenk&amp;ouml;y (&amp;Scedil;irvan-Siirt) pyritic copper ore deposit. Feasibility Study, Vol. 8, Part II, 7170, Unpubl. Report to MTA-Institute, Ankara, 97 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y&amp;inodot;ld&amp;inodot;r&amp;inodot;m, R. and Ulutürk, Y. (1984) Siirt Madenk&amp;ouml;y bak&amp;inodot;r yata&amp;gbreve;&amp;inodot; etüt ve de&amp;inodot;erlendirme raporu. Unpubl. Report to MTA-Institute, 1937/140, 31 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ketin, &amp;Idot;. und Can&amp;inodot;tez, N. (1972) Yap&amp;inodot;sal jeoloji. &amp;Idot;Tü yay&amp;inodot;n&amp;inodot;, Istanbul, 340 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Erler, A. (1984) Tectonic Setting of the Massive Sulfide Deposits of the South-East Anatolian Trust Belt. In: Tekeli, O. and G&amp;ouml;ncüo&amp;gbreve;lu, M.C., Eds., Geology of the Taurus Belt: Proceedings of International Symposium, 309-316.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y&amp;inodot;lmaz, Y., Yi&amp;gbreve;itba&amp;scedil;, E. and Can, &amp;Scedil;. (1993) Ophiolithic and Metamorphic Assemblages of South-East Anatolia and Their Significance in the Geological Evolution of the Orogenic Belt. Tectonics, 12, 1280-1297. https://doi.org/10.1029/93TC00597</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yi&amp;gbreve;it, &amp;Ouml;. (2009) Mineral Deposits of Turkey in Relation to Tethyan Metallogeny: Implications for Future Mineral Exploration. Economic Geology, 104, 19-51.  
https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.104.1.19</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Katashima, K. (1975) Geology of the Cupriferous Pyrite Deposit in the Ophiolite Series between Ergani und Madenk&amp;ouml;y (Siirt), South-Eastern Anatolia, Turkey. Unpubl. Report to MTA-Institute, Ankara, M. 218.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y&amp;inodot;ld&amp;inodot;r&amp;inodot;m, N., Ilhan, S., Y&amp;inodot;ld&amp;inodot;r&amp;inodot;m, E. and D&amp;ouml;nmez, C. (2012) The Geology, Geochemistry and Genetical Features of the Ormanba&amp;scedil;&amp;inodot; Hill (Sincik, Adiyaman) Copper Mineralization. Bulletin Mineral Research and Exploration, 144, 75-104.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Y&amp;inodot;ld&amp;inodot;r&amp;inodot;m</surname><given-names> N. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2013</year>)<article-title>Havza-Ku&amp;scedil;ak Madencili&amp;gbreve;i Kapsaminda Ke&amp;scedil;fedilen “GD Anadolu K&amp;inodot;br&amp;inodot;s Tipi VMS Metalojenik Ku&amp;scedil;a&amp;gbreve;&amp;inodot;”: Koali Karma&amp;scedil;&amp;inodot;&amp;gbreve;&amp;inodot;, Adiyaman B&amp;ouml;lgesi, Türkiye</article-title><source> MTA Do&amp;gbreve;al Kaynaklar ve Ekonomi Bülteni</source><volume> 14</volume>,<fpage> 47</fpage>-<lpage>55</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y&amp;inodot;ld&amp;inodot;r&amp;inodot;m, N., D&amp;ouml;nmez, C., Kang, J., Lee, I., Y&amp;inodot;ld&amp;inodot;r&amp;inodot;m, E., &amp;Ouml;zkümü&amp;scedil;, S., &amp;Ccedil;ifti, Y., Günay, K. and &amp;Idot;lhan, S. (2014) Manyetite zengin K&amp;inodot;br&amp;inodot;s tipi VMS yataklar &amp;inodot;na GD Türkiye’den bir &amp;ouml;rnek: Ortaklar (Gaziantep) VMS yata&amp;gbreve;&amp;inodot;. Türkiye Jeoloji Kurultay&amp;inodot; 14-18 Nisan/April 2014.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Altun, Y., Y&amp;inodot;lmaz, H., &amp;Scedil;iner, &amp;Idot;. und Yazar, F. (2015) The Secrets of Massive Sulfide Deposits in Mid-Ocean Ridges and Küre Ma&amp;gbreve;aradoruk Copper Deposit. Bulletin of the Mineral Research and Exploration, 150, 51-65.  
https://doi.org/10.19111/bmre.22740</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ku&amp;scedil;u, I., Tosdal, R., Genalio&amp;gbreve;lu-Ku&amp;scedil;u, G., Friedman, R. and Ullrich, T. (2013) Late Cretaceous to Middle Eocene Magmatism and Metallogeny of a Portion of the South-Eastern Anatolian Orogenic Belt, East-Central Turkey. Economic Geology, 108, 641-666. https://doi.org/10.2113/econgeo.108.4.641</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ak&amp;inodot;nc&amp;inodot;</surname><given-names> &amp;Ouml;.T. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2009</year>)<article-title>Ophiolite-Hosted Copper and Gold Deposits of South-Eastern Turkey: Formation and Relationship with Seafloor Hydrothermal Processes</article-title><source> Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences</source><volume> 18</volume>,<fpage> 475</fpage>-<lpage>509</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>&amp;Ccedil;a&amp;gbreve;atay</surname><given-names> A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1977</year>)<article-title>Güneydo&amp;gbreve;u Anadolu bak&amp;inodot;r yatak ve zuhurlar&amp;inodot;n&amp;inodot;n jeolojik-mineralojik etüdü sonunda elde edilen jenetik bulgular</article-title><source> Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi</source><volume> 89</volume>,<fpage> 46</fpage>-<lpage>70</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Erler, A. (1980) Siirt Madenk&amp;ouml;y masif sülfit bak&amp;inodot;r yata&amp;gbreve;&amp;inodot; evresindeki hydrothermal alterasyonun kimyasal &amp;ouml;zellikleri. Unpubl. Report to MTA-Institute, Ankara, 1745.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Salanc&amp;inodot;, B. (1980) Dersi Tepe (Mizak-Lice) ve Madenk&amp;ouml;y (&amp;Scedil;irvan-Siirt) bak&amp;inodot;r cevherle&amp;scedil;melerinin jenezi ve Güneydo&amp;gbreve;u Anadolu Ofiyolit Ku&amp;scedil;a&amp;gbreve;&amp;inodot;’&amp;inodot;ndaki yeri. Yerbilimleri Dergisi, 5-6, 2-21.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">&amp;Ccedil;alg&amp;inodot;n, R. (1980) Geology and Mineralogy of the Siirt Madenk&amp;ouml;y Deposit, Turkey. In: Jankovic, S. and Sillitoe, R.H., Eds., European Copper Deposits, University of Beograd, Beograd, 217-221.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Edward, D. und Atkinson, D. (1986) Ore Deposit Geology and Its Influence on Mineral Exploration. University Press, Cambridge, 466 p.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-8056-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sawkins, F.J. (1984) Metal Deposits in Relation to Plate Tectonic. Springer, Berlin, 325 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-96785-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D&amp;ouml;rffel, K. (1962) Beurteilung von Analysenverfahren und-ergebnissen. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-52700-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>&amp;Ccedil;elebi</surname><given-names> H. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1998</year>)<article-title>Die Massivsulfid-Lagerst&amp;auml;tte Ergani-Maden, Elazi&amp;gbreve;/Türkei; Geologie, Geochemie und Geostatistik. Geol. Jahrb</article-title><source> D</source><volume> 108</volume>,<fpage> 35</fpage>-<lpage>67</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Naldrett, A.J. (1981) Platinium Group Element Deposits. Canadian Inst. Mining Metallurgy Spec., Vol. 23, 197-232.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bal, D. and &amp;Ccedil;elebi, H. (2000) Ergani-Maden ve Siirt Madenk&amp;ouml;y bak&amp;inodot;r yataklar&amp;inodot;n&amp;inodot;n Cu, Zn ve S elementlerinin istatistiksel analizlerle kar&amp;scedil;&amp;inodot;la&amp;scedil;t&amp;inodot;r&amp;inodot;lmas&amp;inodot;. F&amp;inodot;rat üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 12, 155-165.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Franklin, J.M., Lydon, J.W. and Sangster, D.F. (1981) Volcanic Associated Massive Sulfide Deposits. 485-627.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huston, D.L. and Large, R.R. (1987) Genetic and Exploration Significance of the Zinc Ratio (100 Zn/(Zn+Pb)) in Massive Sulfide Systems. Economic Geology, 82, 1521-1539. https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.82.6.1521</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bal, D. (1995) Madenk&amp;ouml;y/Siirt bak&amp;inodot;r yata&amp;gbreve;&amp;inodot;'n&amp;inodot;n jeokimyasal ve jeoistatistiksel incelenmesi ve rezervlerinin hesaplanmas&amp;inodot;. Research Project of the Universit&amp;auml;t F&amp;inodot;rat (FüNAF), 103 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Solomon, N. (1976) Volcanic Massive Sulfide Deposits and Their Host Rocks. A Review and an Exploration. In: Wolf, K.K., Ed., Handbook of Stratarbound and Stratiform Ore Deposits, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 21-50.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Galley, A.G. and Koski, R.A. (1999) Setting and Characteristics of Ophiolite Hosted Volcanogenic Massive Sulfide Deposits. In: Volcanic Associated Massive Sulfide Deposits: Processes and Examples in Modern and Ancient Settings, Society of Economic Geologists, Littleton, Vol. 8, 221-246.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zaccarani, F. und Garuti, G. (2008) Mineralogy and Chemical Composition of VMS Deposits of Northern Apennine ophiolites, Italy Evidence for the Influence of Country Rock Type on Ore Composition. Mineralogy and Petrology, 94, 61-83.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00710-008-0010-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zierenberg, R.A., Koski, R.A., Morton, J.L. and Bouse, R.M. (1993) Genesis of Massive Sulfide Deposits on a Sediment-Covered Spreading Center, Escanaba Trough, South Garda Ridge. Economic Geology, 88, 2069-2098.  
https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.88.8.2069</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fouquet, Y., von Stackelberg, U., Charlou, J.L., Erzinger, J., Herzig, P.M., Mühe, R. and Wiedecke, M. (1993) Metallogenesis in Back-Arc Environments: The Lau Basin Example. Economic Geology, 88, 2154-2181.  
https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.88.8.2154</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">David, M. (1977) Geostatistical Ore Reserve Estimation II. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 364 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ahrens, L.H. (1954) The Lognormal Distribution of the Elements (1). Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 5, 49-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(54)90040-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ahrens, L.H. (1954) The Lognormal Distribution of the Elements (2). Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 6, 121-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(54)90021-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ahrens, L.H. (1966) Element Distribution in Specific Igneous Rocks-VII. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 30, 109-122.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(66)90092-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ak&amp;inodot;n, H. and Siemes, H. (1988) Praktische geostatisitk. Springer Verl., Berlin, 304 p.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73542-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tüysüz, N. and Yaylal&amp;inodot;, G. (2005) Jeoistatistik. KTü yay&amp;inodot;n&amp;inodot; 220, Trabzon, 382 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wellmer, F.-W. (1989) Rechnen für Lagerst&amp;auml;ttenkundler 2. Clausthaler Hefte 26, Clausthaler-Zellerfeld, 460 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Madencilik Türkiye (2012) Siirt Madenk&amp;ouml;y bak&amp;inodot;r i&amp;scedil;letmesi. Madencilik Türkiye, 4, 48-69.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E&amp;scedil;gün, S. (2006) Concentration of the Siirt Madenk&amp;ouml;y Ores w&amp;inodot;th Flotation Method (Turkish). Unpubl. Master Thesis to Institute for Natural Sciences of Technical University Istanbul, 68 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Türkmen, M.G. (2010) Copper Production by the Sublevel Block Caving Method (Turkish). Unpubl. Master Thesis to Institute for Natural Sciences of &amp;Ccedil;ukurova Univ., 102 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alt&amp;inodot;parmak, H. (2014) Microm&amp;inodot;ne paket program&amp;inodot; ile ü boyutlu maden planlamas&amp;inodot;. Unpubl. Report to the Faculty for Mining of Technical University Istanbul, 28 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82806-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ceylan, A. and Bulut, G. (2016) Benef&amp;inodot;cation of Siirt Madenk&amp;ouml;y Copper Ore by Flotation Method (Turkish). Madencilik, 55, 17-26.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>