<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2018.93036</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-82679</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Sublethal Doses of Insecticides Affect the Fecundity and Fertility of the &lt;i&gt;Chrysodeixis includens&lt;/i&gt;?
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Raimundo</surname><given-names>Henrique Ferreira Rodrigues</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Luciana</surname><given-names>Barboza da Silva</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Thiago</surname><given-names>Ferreira Rodrigues</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gleidyane</surname><given-names>Novais Lopes</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Eliane</surname><given-names>Carneiro</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bruno</surname><given-names>Ettore Pavan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Post-Graduation Program in Plant Science Agronomy, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Bom Jesus, Brazil</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Faculty of Engineering UNESP Ilha Solteira, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Ilha Solteira, Brazil</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>lubarbosabio@hotmail.com(LBDS)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>31</day><month>01</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>483</fpage><lpage>494</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>5,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>24,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2018</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>27,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2018</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The objective was to determine lethal concentrations and to evaluate the effects of sublethal doses of insecticides on 
  Chrysodeixis 
  includens
   under laboratory conditions. The standard population of 
  C. 
  include
  n
  s
   
  was kept on artificial diet under controlled conditions (25
  &#176;C &#177; 5&#176;C, 60% &#177; 10 RU, 12:12 h). The active principles used were B. thuringiensis, Indoxacarb and Teflubenzuron. The CL<sub>25</sub> and LC<sub>50</sub> obtained from dose response curve (estimated from eight concentrations of each active principle) were diluted in water and applied to the back of third instar caterpillars and compared to the control (water). The insecticides used showed lethal and sublethal effects in C. includens. Bacillus thuringiensis was 6.21 and 2.79 times more toxic to soybean looper when compared to the products Indoxacarb and Teflubenzuron, respectively. Insecticides applied to the caterpillars reduced survival and affected the biomass gain with increased larvae and pupae longevity, with a significant reduction in fertility (40%) and fecundity (94.97%) in adults. In the present study it was observed that both survival and larval biomass gain have a direct effect on fecundity and fertility, respectively. Therefore the active ingredients Indoxacarb, Teflubenzuron and B. thuringiensis can be used in rotation as a tool in the C. includens.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;Bacillus thuringiensis&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Chemical Control</kwd><kwd> Indoxacarb</kwd><kwd> Soybean Looper</kwd><kwd> Teflubenzuron</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Crops such as soybeans and beans have suffered from constant population outbreaks of Chrysodeixis includens (Walker, 1857) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref2">2</xref>] , known as soybean looper [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref3">3</xref>] , with great defoliator potential [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref4">4</xref>] of polyphagous habit [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>The use of chemicals and transgenic plants is a major control measure employed in the management of C. includens [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref2">2</xref>] . Among the commonly used insecticides, there is an obstacle due to two aspects: resistant, and the lack of knowledge about the lethal and sublethal effects of insecticides on the pest [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>The toxicity of the insecticide reduces to the ability of a molecule to cause harmful damage to the insect. Since control failures during management [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref8">8</xref>] may result in exposure of the pest to sublethal doses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref7">7</xref>] . In addition, insects that survive after toxic exposure to an insecticide may present changes in biological, reproductive, behavioral and physiological parameters [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>The main insecticides used in the management of lepidopteran pests are inhibitors of biosynthesis of chitin (Teflubenzuron); voltage-dependent sodium channel blockers (Indoxacarb); and the microbial disruptors of the mesenteric membrane (Bacillus thuringiensis) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref10">10</xref>] . The sublethal effects of these insecticides are already documented in the literature, and the exposure of Helicoverpa armigera (H&#252;bner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to sublethal doses of the active ingredients B. thuringiensis and Indoxacarb resulted in an increase in larval longevity, reduction in biomass gain larvae and pupae in addition to affecting the fertility and fecundity of adults [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>Studies that seek to know the changes on the biology and reproduction of the pests in recurrence of control failures, are of great importance in the integrated pest management (IPM), to establish how and what characteristics of the insects are affected by the exposure of the caterpillar to an sublethal dose of the insecticide. The objective was to determine the lethal concentrations (CL<sub>25</sub> and CL<sub>50</sub>) and to evaluate the sublethal effects caused by the application of insecticide overdoses on C. includens under laboratory conditions.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Creation Maintenance</title><p>The insects were maintained with artificial diet adapted from [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref12">12</xref>] wheat germ (237 g), beer yeast (152 g), ascorbic acid (15 g), sorbic acid (4.45 g), nipagin (9.45 g), agar (12.5 g) (propionic acid 41.8%, 4.2% phosphoric acid and 54% water). Caterpillars (&lt;24 h old) were individualized and kept in plastic cups of 50 ml, capped, fed with artificial diet until reaching the pupal stage. The adults were transferred to PVC cages of 40 cm H &#215; 30 cm &#216;, internally covered with sheets of sulphite paper for oviposition. These were fed a honey-based solution (10%) and kept in controlled environment (25˚C &#177; 5˚C, 60% &#177; 10% RH and 12:12 h). The eggs were collected and stored in plastic cups of 50 ml with lid until the hatching of the caterpillars.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Dose Response Curve</title><p>A preliminary test of the toxicity of 13 insecticides on C. includens was carried out, using the 50%, 100% and 150% fractions of the recommended dose, the experiment was conducted in a Double Factorial (Product x Dose).</p><p>The active principles selected were B. thuringiensis, Indoxacarb and Teflubenzuron. To estimate the dose response curve, the dose recommended for the management of C. includens in the soybean crop was fractionated in eight concentrations (0%, 5%, 15%, 25%, 50%, 75%, 100% and 125%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><p>The bioassay was performed and conducted according to the adapted methodology of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref13">13</xref>] , using 3rd instar caterpillars of C. includens. After assembly of the experiment the caterpillars were kept under controlled conditions, previously described. The experiment was conducted in DIC with three replicates (15 caterpillars/replicate). Mortality was assessed every 24 hours for a period of 96 hours. The caterpillars, which after physical stimulation with the tweezers in the prothorax region showed no movement, were considered dead. Lethal concentrations (CL<sub>25</sub> and CL<sub>50</sub>) were estimated using the Probit routine with the statistical program SAS Version University Edition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref14">14</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Sublethal Effects</title><p>The concentrations (CL<sub>25</sub> and CL<sub>50</sub>) obtained in the previous bioassay were used to characterize the sublethal effects of insecticides on C. includens and compared to a control (water). The bioassay was performed and conducted according to the methodology described by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref13">13</xref>] .</p><p>The larval survival was evaluated daily until the caterpillars reached the pupal stage. The obtained pupae were weighted at 24 hours, separated by sex and transferred to Petri dishes lined internally with filter paper, and evaluated daily until the adult phase, to evaluate longevity, emergence, fertility and fecundity of adults.</p><p>The values for the number of caterpillars that became pupae and the number of pupae that hatched were used to estimate the survival of larvae and pupae,</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Insecticides and doses used to determine the dose response curve in Chrysodeixis includens</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Treatments</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="7"  >Concentration of the active ingredient (&#181;g ia. mL<sup>−1</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >125%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Indoxacarb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bacillus thuringiensis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.176</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.528</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Teflubenzuron</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.125</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.375</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.625</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.875</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.125</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>i.a. Active ingredient.</p><p>respectively. Pupae sexing was performed according to the adapted methodology of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref15">15</xref>] . To determine the sex ratio, the number of females was divided by total pupae (number of pupae). The bioassay referring to the sublethal effects of insecticides on larvae and pupae of C. includens were conducted in completely randomized design (CRD) with four replicates (20 caterpillars/replicate).</p><p>After sexing, individuals up to two days old were grouped in pairs and fed with 10% honey solution, provided in 50 mL cups with cotton, kept in PVC cages (15 cm high/10 cm &#216;) covered with A4 paper and sealed at the lower end with cardboard and top with elasticated “voile” type fabric. The cages were randomly distributed on shelves maintained in a controlled environment (25˚C &#177; 5˚C, 60% &#177; 10 RU and 12:12 h), egg counting was performed every 48 hours using a stereomicroscope, until the end of period of oviposition. The mean number of eggs per female was defined as fecundity and fertility was calculated from the viability of 100 eggs from each couple. Evaluations related to oviposition were conducted in CRD using 6 replicates of each concentration (one pair/replicate).</p><p>The sublethal effects evaluated were survival (larvae and pupae), biomass and longevity of larvae and pupae; sexual reason; fecundity and fertility.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Statistical Analyses</title><p>Pearson correlation coefficients were estimated between the evaluated characters (sublethal effects). From the correlations estimated the trail coefficient, this study deals with the decomposition of the correlation between the basic variable (fecundity and fertility) and the explanatory ones (survival, biomass and longevity of larvae and pupae, sexual ratio). All the mathematical description of the track coefficient estimation is found [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref16">16</xref>] , all statistical procedures were performed based on the genetic-statistical procedure of the Genes software [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref17">17</xref>] . The design used in all bioassays was completely randomized design since the obtained data were submitted to analysis of variance (ANOVA), by the test f at 5% of probability. Significant results were compared by the Tukey Means Differentiation Test with program R Version 3.2.1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref18">18</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>Bacillus thuringiensis was considered to be the most toxic product to C. includens because it presented the lowest value for LC50, being 6.21 and 2.79 times lower than the Indoxacarb and Teflubenzuron products, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). By means of the obtained results the three active principles can be used in rotation in the C. includens.</p><p>The results concerning the effect of the insecticides on the development and reproduction of C. includens are described in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. The three active principles evaluated reduced the biomass gain in the larvae. The changes on the biomass and the longevity of the pupae were significant, however they were not affected drastically the development of the insect. According to the results obtained for the characteristics of adults of C. includens, it was observed that the</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Lethal concentration (CL<sub>25 </sub>and CL<sub>50</sub>) of insecticides tested on Chrysodeixis includens after 96 hours of exposure</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Treatments</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Answer Dose &#181;g ia. mL<sup>−1</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Inclination &#177; DP</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >X<sup>2</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >F**</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CL<sub>25</sub> (IC 95%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CL<sub>50</sub> (IC 95%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bacillus thuringiensis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5 (1.23 - 1.75)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.45 (2.13 - 2.79)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.554 &#177; 3.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.96</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Indoxacarb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.10 (4.91 - 15.69)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.21 (10.21 - 27.19)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.598 &#177; 8.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >249.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.006</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Teflubenzuron</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.28 (1.69 - 4.80)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.84 (4.62 - 8.74)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.501 &#177; 2.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.389</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>DP: Standard deviation; CL: Lethal concentration; CI: Confidence interval; X2: Chi-square; C.V.: Coefficient of variation **(p ≤ 0.01). ia―active ingredient.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Biological and reproductive parameters of C. includens after application to CL<sub>25</sub> and LC<sub>50</sub> of different active principles</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameter<sup>1</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Dose</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Bacillus thuringiensis</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Indoxacarb</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Teflubenzuron</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Witness</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >F</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C.V. (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Larval Biomass (mg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CL<sub>25</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.09 &#177; 2.57 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.25 &#177; 3.85 ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.51 &#177; 1.21 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.00 &#177; 3.42 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.77**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CL<sub>50</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.57 &#177; 1.09 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.95 &#177; 1.29 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.60 &#177; 1.97 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.00 &#177; 3.42 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.02**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.41</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Larval Longevity (Days)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CL<sub>25</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.18 &#177; 0.43 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.31 &#177; 0.08 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.26 &#177; 0.42 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.72 &#177; 0.09 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.26**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.32</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CL<sub>50</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.28 &#177; 0.21 ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.47 &#177; 0.13 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.38 &#177; 0.18 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.72 &#177; 0.09 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.92**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Pupae Biomass (mg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CL<sub>25</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >242.79 &#177; 1.42 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >250.32 &#177; 2.79 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >231.01 &#177; 5.91 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >245.15 &#177; 1.38 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.32**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CL<sub>50</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >235.5 &#177; 5.83 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >243.06 &#177; 2.79 ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >231.73 &#177; 1.84 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >245.15 &#177; 2.15 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.85**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Longevity of Pupae (Days)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CL<sub>25</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.44 &#177; 0.15 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.38 &#177; 0.08 c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.86 &#177; 0.06 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.26 &#177; 0.05 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.33**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.45</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CL<sub>50</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.67 &#177; 0.24 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.48 &#177; 0.09 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.79 &#177; 0.30 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.26 &#177; 0.05a b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.28**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.44</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Sexual Reason</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CL<sub>25</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.61 &#177; 0.06 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.44 &#177; 0.01 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63 &#177; 0.04 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39 &#177; 0.05 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.60**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CL<sub>50</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48 &#177; 0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.383 &#177; 0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45 &#177; 0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39 &#177; 0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.38<sup>N.S.</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Fecundity of Adults</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CL<sub>25</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.00 &#177; 1.06 d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >107.16 &#177; 4.83 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.50 &#177; 1.60 c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >405.00 &#177; 5.77 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1703**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.99</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CL<sub>50</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >114.16 &#177; 3.51 c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >132.83 &#177; 2.35 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.33 &#177; 1.02 d</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >405.00 &#177; 5.77 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2001*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Fertility (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CL<sub>25</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.33 &#177; 2.47 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.00 &#177; 6.95 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.50 &#177; 3.81 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.16 &#177; 0.83 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.9**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CL<sub>50</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.00 &#177; 3.41 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.83 &#177; 3.00 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.83 &#177; 3.74 b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.16 &#177; 0.83 a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.35**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.58</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>**Significant to 1 of probability by the test f. N.S. Not significant by test f. 1 Medias followed by the same letter on the line do not differ by test Tukey (p ≤ 0.05).</p><p>CL<sub>25</sub> of the active ingredients B. thuringiensis and Teflubenzuron increased in 56.86% and 60.61%, respectively, the sexual ratio in relation to the control. The CL<sub>25</sub> of the active ingredient B. thuringiensis reduced the adult fecundity by 87.87% (355.87 eggs), while the Teflubenzuron LC<sub>50</sub> decreased by 94.97% (384.62 eggs) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). The three active principles reduced fertility by approximately 40% for LC<sub>50</sub>, with the highest percentages for B. thuringiensis and Indoxacarb (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><p>The survival of C. includens was affected by insecticides, and the results obtained were statistically significant (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>), within each LC at each stage of development evaluated. The CL<sub>25</sub> of B. thuringiensis and Teflubenzuron caused a reduction in larval survival of 28.75% and 275%, respectively, and in total survival 57.50% and 66.25%, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Coefficients of the Pearson correlation between the biological parameters of C. includens after application to CL<sub>25</sub> and LC<sub>50</sub> of different active principles</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >SL</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >BL</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >LL</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >BP</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >LP</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >SP</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >RS</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ST</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >FT</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.70**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LV</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.47*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.49**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.51**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.49**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.29<sup>N.S.</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.73**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.41*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.49**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.52**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23<sup>N.S.</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.19<sup>N.S..</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.22<sup>N.S.</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.32<sup>N.S.</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21<sup>N.S.</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08<sup>N.S.</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15<sup>N.S.</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.21<sup>N.S.</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ST</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.83**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.56*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.41*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.37<sup>N.S.</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.29<sup>N.S.</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12<sup>N.S.</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05<sup>N.S.</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15<sup>N.S.</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.03<sup>N.S.</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.62**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.53**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.73**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.29<sup>N.S.</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25<sup>N.S.</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.18<sup>N.S.</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.31<sup>N.S.</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.66**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63**</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>SL―Larval Survival; BL―Larval biomass; LG―Larval Longevity; BP―Biomass of the pupa; Longevity of the pupa; SP―Survival of the pupa; RS―Sexual Reason; ST―Total Survival; FT-Fertility; Total FC―Fecundity. Ns, *, ** not significant, significant at 5% and 1% respectively by the test t.</p><p>The Teflubenzuron LC<sub>50</sub> decreased by 56.25% and 73.75%, larval and the total survival, respectively, whereas in the same dose B. thuringiensis reduced the survival of C. includens pupae by 56.35% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>According to the Pearson correlation coefficients established among the biological parameters evaluated (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>), it was observed that the larval biomass presented a negative correlation with larval and pupal longevity and positive survival (larval, pupal and total), fecundity and fertility.</p><p>According to the coefficients estimated by the trail analysis (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>), it can be established that fecundity has a positive, strong and direct influence in relation to total survival, with the same effect in relation to fertility in contrast to biomass larval. The fecundity is affected indirectly by the parameters biomass, survival and longevity of larval and pupae; as well as the parameters longevity of larvae and pupae in conjunction with total survival indirectly affect the fertility of adults (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Estimates of the direct and indirect effects of the variables survival, biomass, longevity and sexual reason on the correlations with the main variables fecundity and fertility of C. includens after application to CL<sub>25</sub> and LC<sub>50</sub> of different active principles</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Association Ways</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Track Coefficients with Collinearity</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Association Ways</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Track Coefficients with Collinearity</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fecundity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fecundity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fertility</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="8"  >Larval Survival</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.613</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.520</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="8"  >Pupae Longevity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.040</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.043</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - LB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.367</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - LS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.302</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.256</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - LL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.086</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.220</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - LB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.113</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.598</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - PB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.009</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.046</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - LL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.140</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.124</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - PL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.020</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.021</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - PB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.042</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - OS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.099</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.141</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - PS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.088</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.125</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - SR</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.010</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.033</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - SR</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.037</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - TS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.210</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.014</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - TS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.609</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.007</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="8"  >Larval Biomass</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.318</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.821</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="8"  >Pupae Survival</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.443</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.628</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - LS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.386</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.233</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - LS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.137</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.117</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - LL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.093</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.170</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - LB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.131</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.399</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - PB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.051</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - LL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.093</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.144</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - PL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.014</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.031</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - PB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.017</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - PS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.182</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.305</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - PL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.009</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - SR</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.018</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.028</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - SR</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.041</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - TS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.048</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.010</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - TS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.137</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.013</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="8"  >Larval Longevity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.192</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.349</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="8"  >Sexual Reason</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.057</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.193</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - LS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.274</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.327</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - LS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.103</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.088</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - LB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.155</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.399</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - LB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.098</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.119</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - PB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.010</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.043</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - LL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.028</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.107</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - PL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.029</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - PB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.012</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - PS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.215</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.259</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - PL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.008</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - SR</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.059</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - PS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.094</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.134</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - TS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.831</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - TS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.417</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.005</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="8"  >Pupae Biomass</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.019</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.097</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="8"  >Total Survival</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.520</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.018</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - LS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.288</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.244</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - LS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.488</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.414</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - LB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.140</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.435</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - LB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.219</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.449</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - LL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.102</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.153</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - LL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.105</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.240</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - PL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.017</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.019</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - PB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.037</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - PS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.078</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.110</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - PL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.017</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - SR</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.023</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - PS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.331</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.470</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - TS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.578</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DI - SR</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.053</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>DE―Direct Effect; DI―Indirect Effect; LS―Larval Survival; LB―Larval Biomass; LL―Larval Longevity; PB―Pupae Biomass; PL―Pupae Longevity; PS―Pupae Survival; SR―Sexual Reason; TS―Total Survival.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>The use of active principles with different modes of action is suggested as a tool of phytosanitary protection [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref7">7</xref>] , in order to avoid the occurrence of problems related to resistance of insect pests [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref8">8</xref>] . Based on this premise the present study had the purpose of evaluating the toxicity of different insecticides on the soybean looper (C. includens), being found that the active principles B. thuringiensis, Indoxacarb and Teflubenzuron can be used in the management of C. includens, because the values obtained for LC<sub>50</sub> were similar to those reported in the literature for other pest lepidoptera, such as H. armigera [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref19">19</xref>] . Since studies referring to the baseline characterization of susceptibility of soybean looper to insecticides are scarce in the literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref20">20</xref>] .</p><p>Among the evaluated products, the active ingredient B. thuringiensis was considered the most toxic to C. includens because it presented the lowest value of LC<sub>50</sub>. This is an important finding because the entomopathogenic bacterium, B. thuringiensis, is a biological control agent that allows the control of a pest range, with great efficiency and with less damage to the environment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref21">21</xref>] .</p><p>During the phytosanitary management of the crop, application failures may occur [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref8">8</xref>] , resulting in the exposure of the pest to insecticide sublethal doses, according to results found, where changes in the biology and reproduction of C. includens were observed through the toxic action of sublethal doses of insecticides B. thuringiensis, Indoxacarb and Teflubenzuron. This is because insect exposure to a sublethal concentration of insecticide may not lead to target pest death, but may affect biochemical reactions and physiological processes at secondary sites of action [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref7">7</xref>] . It is of fundamental importance to perform studies aimed at characterizing the sublethal effects of different insecticides on the soybean looper, since they provide prior knowledge to be increased within the IPM, especially when faults occur during the application [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref23">23</xref>] .</p><p>It was found that C. includens exposure to B. thuringiensis, Indoxacarb and Teflubenzuron active substances affect longevity as well as reduce the biomass gain of larvae and pupae, besides affecting the fecundity and fertility of adults [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref24">24</xref>] .</p><p>Teflubenzuron caused the highest percentages of reduction in larval biomass gain. For Teflubenzuron is an inhibitor of the biosynthesis of chitin type 0, which affects the development and metamorphosis of the insect [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref10">10</xref>] , which can promote the loss of hemolymph and body fluids during ecdysis, of larval biomass [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref22">22</xref>] . This is an important finding within IPM because smaller caterpillars cause minor damage [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>The lower accumulation of biomass results in an increase in the larval longevity of C. includens. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref7">7</xref>] in his work with the exposure of H. armigera to CL30 of Hexaflumuron (analogous to Teflubenzuron) incorporated into the diet, observed a considerable reduction in larval biomass gain with an increase in larval longevity (five days), as observed in the present study. As the increase in larval longevity gives rise to natural biological control, as the period of exposure of the pest to natural enemies increases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref25">25</xref>] . It was found a low larval biomass with an increase in larval and/or pupal longevity, which delays the emergence of the adult, besides reducing the fecundity and fertility [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref13">13</xref>] .</p><p>The active principles B. thuringiensis and Teflubenzuron increased the sexual ratio of adults, being an unfavorable point in pest management, since a larger number of females result in a high number of offspring, increasing the pest damage potential. However, low fecundity and fertility rates were obtained, these results reinforce the importance of conducting experiments related to the complete characterization of the insect-pest biology.</p><p>There was a considerable reduction in the fertility and fecundity of adults through the toxic action of the products, a significant result for the context of pest management, did not occur adult death, but there was a decrease in population density. These results corroborate with those found in the literature, where applications of insecticides made in immature stages caused changes in the frequency of copula, female fertility, in the production of sperm, which results in a reduction in the proliferation (fecundity and fertility) of the insect-plague [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref27">27</xref>] . The active principle Teflubenzuron caused the highest percentages of reduction of survival of the soybean looper. These results are consistent with the literature, since the same active principle incorporated in the diet reduced the survival of H. armigera by 60% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref28">28</xref>] . A significant reduction in pupal survival was observed, resulting in a lower emergence of adults, where the active principles B. thuringiensis and Teflubenzuron had the highest percentages of reduction. For the insect, pupae and pupa-adult transformation phases, the low concentrations of B. thuringiensis are the most sensitive [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref29">29</xref>] . Results lower than those obtained were the sublethal concentrations―CL<sub>25</sub> and CL<sub>50</sub>―of B. thuringiensis, with 40.20% and 30.5%, respectively, of the reduction in the emergence of adults [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref11">11</xref>] . Reducing survival through the use of insecticide sublethal doses is important in integrated pest management, as the pest population may remain below the control level when the insect is exposed at doses below the recommended dose.</p><p>The reduction in the survival of C. includens, reconciled with the increase in the time of development, the reduction in the fertility and fecundity of the adults; may increase population doubling time and subsequently lead to lower population growth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref6">6</xref>] . These findings are important because the insect-pest population may require a longer period of time to reach the level of control.</p><p>A positive correlation was observed between the reduction in the larval biomass gain of the insects with a reduction in the fertility and fecundity of the adults. Because caterpillars weakened from a nutritional point of view, they originate smaller adults with lower fecundity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82679-ref7">7</xref>] . When analyzing the results obtained it was determined that reductions in larval biomass gain can lead to changes in the cycle and reproduction of C. includens. And according to the track analysis it can be established that both the reduction in survival and the gain of larval biomass have a direct impact on the fecundity and fertility of adults. The larval biomass gain, longevity of larvae and pupae indirectly affect fertility and fecundity. It can be established that the reproductive parameters are affected negatively, when the caterpillars suffer reductions in the gain of larval biomass. It is necessary to carry out studies that seek to establish how insecticides sublethal doses affect the nutrition, fertility and fecundity of C. includens adults.</p><p>In summary, a drastic reduction in survival was observed, as well as in the fertility and fecundity of adults, resulting in a smaller number of fertile adults. These findings are consistent with the existing premises where applications of insecticide sublethal doses in immature stages of development affect the development.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>The active ingredient B. thuringiensis presents higher toxicity to C. includens when compared to Indoxacarb and Teflubenzuron products.</p><p>The active principles evaluated affect the survival, biology, fecundity and fertility of C. includens.</p><p>The survival and the gain of larval biomass have a strong direct effect on fecundity and fertility, respectively.</p><p>Indoxacarb, Teflubenzuron and B. thuringiensis can be used in rotation as a tool in the management of C. includens.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Rodrigues, R.H.F., da Silva, L.B., Rodrigues, T.F., Lopes, G.N., Carneiro, E. and Pavan, B.E. (2018) Sublethal Doses of Insecticides Affectthe Fecundity and Fertility of the Chrysodeixis includens? American Journal of Plant Sciences, 9, 483-494. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2018.93036</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.82679-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bernardi, O., Malvestiti, G.S., Dourado, P.M., Oliveira, W.S., Martinelli,S., Berger, G.U. and Omoto, C. (2012) Assessment of the High-Dose Concept and Level of Control Provided by MON 87701 × MON 89788 Soybean against Anticarsia gemmatalis and Pseudoplusia includens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Brazil. Pest Management Science, 68, 1083-1091. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3271</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82679-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baldin, E.L.L., Lourencao, A.L. and Schlick-Souza, E.C. (2014) Outbreaks of Chrysodeixis includens (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Common Bean and Castor Bean in Sao Paulo State, Brazil. Bragantia, 73, 458-465.  
https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.0277</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82679-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alford, R.A. and Hammond Jr., A.M. (1982) Plusiinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Populations in Louisiana Soybean Ecosystems as Determined with Looplure-Baited Traps. Journal of Economic Entomology, 75, 647-650.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/75.4.647</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82679-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bueno, R.C.O.F., de Freitas Bueno, A., Moscardi, F., Postali Parra, J.R. and Hoffmann-Campo, C.B. (2011) Lepidopteran Larva Consumption of Soybean Foliage: Basis for Developing Multiple-Species Economic Thresholds for Pest Management Decisions. Pest Management Science, 67, 170-174. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.2047</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82679-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Specht, A., de Paula-Moraes, S.V. and Sosa-Gómez, D.R. (2015) Host Plants of Chrysodeixis includens (Walker) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Plusiinae). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 59, 343-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbe.2015.09.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82679-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saber, M., Parsaeyan, E., Vojoudi, S., Bagheri, M., Mehrvar, A. and Kamita, S.G. (2013) Acute Toxicity and Sublethal Effects of Methoxyfenozide and Thiodicarb on Survival, Development and Reproduction of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Crop Protection, 43, 14-17.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2012.09.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82679-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vojoudi, S., Saber, M., Gharekhani, G. and Esfandiari, E. (2017) Toxicity and Sublethal Effects of Hexaflumuron and Indoxacarb on the Biological and Biochemical Parameters of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Iran. Crop Protection, 91, 100-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.09.020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82679-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guedes, R.N.C. (2017) Insecticide Resistance, Control Failure Likelihood and the First Law of Geography. Pest Management Science, 73, 479-484.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4452</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82679-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Desneux, N., Decourtye, A. and Delpuech, J.M. (2007) The Sublethal Effects of Pesticides on Beneficial Arthropods. Annual Review of Entomology, 52, 81-106.  
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.52.110405.091440</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82679-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sparks, T.C. and Nauen, R. (2015) IRAC: Mode of Action Classification and Insecticide Resistance Management. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 121, 122-128.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2014.11.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82679-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Carneiro, E., Silva, L.B., Silva, A.F., Santos, V.B., Almeida, M.L.S., Carvalho, G.S. and Veras, M. (2016) Toxicity and Sublethal Effects of Insecticides on Helicoverpa armigera Hübner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). African Journal of Agricultural Research, 11, 1966-1972.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82679-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kasten Júnior, P., Precetti, A.A.C.M. and Parra, J.R.P. (1978) Dados biológicos comparativos de Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith, 1797) em duas dietas artificiais e substrato natural. Revista de Agricultura, 53, 68-78.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82679-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Perveen, F. (2000) Sublethal Effects of Chlorfluazuron on Reproductivity and Viability of Spodoptera litura (F.) (Lep., Noctuidae). Journal of Applied Entomology, 124, 223-231. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0418.2000.00468.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82679-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">SAS Institute (2015) SAS User’s Manual. SAS University Edition, SAS Institute, Cary.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82679-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Butt, B.A. and Cantu, E. (1962) Sex Determination of Lepidopterous Pupae. United States Department of Agriculture, AgricultureResearch Service.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82679-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cruz, C.D., Regazzi, A.J. and Carneiro, P.C.S. (1997) Modelos biométricos aplicados ao melhoramento genético (Vol. 2). UFV.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82679-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cruz, C.D. (2013) Genes: A Software Package for Analysis in Experimental Statistics and Quantitative Genetics. Acta Scientiarum: Agronomy, 35, 271-276.  
https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v35i3.21251</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82679-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R Core Team (2016) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. 
https://www.R-project.org/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82679-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liao, C., Heckel, D.G. and Akhurst, R. (2002) Toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis Insecticidal Proteins for Helicoverpa armigera and Helicoverpa punctigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), Major Pests of Cotton. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 80, 55-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2011(02)00035-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82679-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Owen, L.N., Catchot, A.L., Musser, F.R., Gore, J., Cook, D.C. and Jackson, R. (2013) Susceptibility of Chrysodeixis includens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to Reduced-Risk Insecticides. Florida Entomologist, 96, 554-559.  
https://doi.org/10.1653/024.096.0221</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82679-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Velivelli, S.L., De Vos, P., Kromann, P., Declerck, S. and Prestwich, B.D. (2014) Biological Control Agents: From Field to Market, Problems, and Challenges. Trends in Biotechnology, 32, 493-496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2014.07.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82679-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Smagghe, G., Gomez, L.E. and Dhadialla, T.S. (2012) Bisacylhydrazine Insecticides for Selective Pest Control. Advances in Insect Physiology, 43, 163-246.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-391500-9.00002-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82679-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ramos, R.S., Sediyama, C.S., Queiroz, E.A., Costa, T.L., Martins, J.C., Araújo, T.A. and Picanco, M.C. (2017) Toxicity of Insecticides to Chrysodeixis includens and Their Direct and Indirect Effects on the Predator Blaptostethus pallescens. Journal of Applied Entomology, 141, 677-689. https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.12382</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82679-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">El-Sheikh, E.S.A. and Aamir, M.M. (2011) Comparative Effectiveness and Field Persistence of Insect Growth Regulators on a Field Strain of the Cotton Leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis, Boisd (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Crop Protection, 30, 645-650.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2011.02.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82679-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thaler, J.S., McArt, S.H. and Kaplan, I. (2012) Compensatory Mechanisms for Ameliorating the Fundamental Trade-Off between Predator Avoidance and Foraging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 12075-12080.  
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1208070109</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82679-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Biddinger, D.J. and Hull, L.A. (1999) Sublethal Effects of Selected Insecticides on Growth and Reproduction of a Laboratory Susceptible Strain of Tufted Apple Bud Moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 92, 314-324.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/92.2.314</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82679-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shahout, H.A., Xu, J., Qiao, J. and Jia, Q. (2011) Sublethal Effects of Methoxyfenozide, in Comparison to Chlorfluazuron and Beta-Cypermethrin, on the Reproductive Characteristics of Common Cutworm Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of the Entomological Research Society, 13, 53-63.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82679-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vivan, L.M., Torres, J.B. and Fernandes, P.L.S. (2016) Activity of Selected Formulated Biorational and Synthetic Insecticides against Larvae of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 110, 118-126.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82679-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Savini, V. and Fazii, P. (2016) Bacillus thuringiensis Insecticide Properties. In: Savini, V., Ed., The Diverse Faces of Bacillus cereus, Elsevier Inc., Amsterdam, 139-155.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801474-5.00012-8</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>