<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">WJM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>World Journal of Mechanics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-049X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/wjm.2018.82002</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">WJM-82416</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Engineering</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Solar Radiation Pressure and Gravitational Waves Effects on Sun-Synchronous Orbits
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>M.</surname><given-names>H. A. Youssef</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Astronomy Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>mhyoussef@sci.cu.edu.eg</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>11</day><month>02</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>11</fpage><lpage>25</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>27,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>9,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2018</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>12,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2018</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  For certain values of semi-major axis and eccentricity, orbit plane precession caused by Earth oblate is synchronous with the mean orbital motion of the apparent Sun (a sun-synchronism). Many forces cause slow changes in the inclination and ascending node of sun-synchronous orbits. In this work, we investigate the analytical perturbations due to the direct solar radiation pressure and gravitational waves effects. A full analytical solution is obtained using technique of canonical Lie-transformation up to the order three in (the oblateness of the Earth). The solar radiation pressure and gravitational waves perturbations cause second order effects on all the elements of the elliptic orbit (the eccentricity, inclination, ascending node, argument of perigee, and semi-major axis) consequently these perturbations will cause disturbance in the sun-synchronism. Also we found that the perturbation or the behavior of gravitational waves almost the same as the perturbation or the behavior of solar radiation pressure and their coupling will incorporate the sun-synchronism through the secular rate of the ascending node precession.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Orbital Mechanics</kwd><kwd> Celestial Mechanics</kwd><kwd> Astrodynamics</kwd><kwd> Gravitational Waves</kwd><kwd> Perturbations</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>It is well known that the sun-synchronous orbits are useful for remote sensing mission, because the illumination of the sub satellite point (the point where a straight line drawn from a satellite to the center of the Earth intersects the Earth’s surface) is nearly constant on each successive pass. Also sun-synchronous orbits must be retrograde (i.e. inclination greater than 90˚). If the sun-synchronous orbit is high enough and the sub satellite point is initiated outside the Earth’s shadow, then the illumination of the sub satellite point will be remain continuously throughout the year. Since a sun-synchronous orbits follows the Sun, so the solar pressure perturbations cannot be neglected, if the orbit is un-shadowed, long period occur in all the orbital elements except semi-major axis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82416-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82416-ref2">2</xref>] . It is well known that Earth oblateness causes the orbital angular momentum vector of earth satellite to process about the Earth’s polar axis. For certain value of semi-major axis and eccentricity orbit plane precession caused by oblateness is synchronous with the mean orbital motion of the apparent Sun (a sun-synchro- nism). Gravitational perturbations arising from a spherical Earth, Moon, and Sun cause long period fluctuations in the mean argument of perigee, eccentricity, inclination, and ascending node [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82416-ref3">3</xref>] . Relativistic effects with SRP incorporate the sun-synchronism [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82416-ref4">4</xref>] . The short and long period’s perturbations due to the effect of GW on the orbital elements of Jupiter are studies by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82416-ref5">5</xref>] . Semi-analytical theory of the mean orbital motion due to the effect of gravitational waves is investigated by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82416-ref6">6</xref>] . Many authors discussed the effect of solar radiation pressure and the effects of gravitational waves separately but the purpose of the current contribution is to investigate the coupling effects of solar radiation pressure and gravitational waves on sun-synchronism of elliptic orbits, using the perturbation technique based on the canonical Lie-transformation. Two canonical transformations obtained to eliminate the short-period and long-period terms. The solution is obtained up to order three and two in secular and periodic terms respectively assuming the effect of direct solar radiation pressure and the gravitational waves of the same order of magnitude and equal to the order of J 2 2 (the second order zonal harmonic of the geo potential i.e. 10<sup>−6</sup>).</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. The Formulation</title><p>The Hamiltonian which describes the moving Earth’s satellite under the influence of SRP and the GW can be expressed as</p><p>H = H g + H s + H w (1)</p><p>where H g represents the Hamiltonian of a satellite in the Earth’s gravitational field</p><p>H g = v P − L (2)</p><p>v is the velocity of satellite, P is the canonical momentum, and L is the Lagrangian of a satellite moving about a central body in Einstein form of the post Newtonian gravitational field [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82416-ref7">7</xref>]</p><p>L = 1 2 v 2 − U N + 1 c l 2 { v 4 8 − 1 2 U N 2 − 3 2 v 2 U N } (3)</p><p>where c l is the speed of light and U N the Earth’s gravitational potential is developed in series up the fourth harmonic as [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82416-ref8">8</xref>]</p><p>U N = − μ r { 1 − J 2 2 r 2 R 2 ( 3 sin 2 δ − 1 ) − J 3 2 r 3 R 3 ( 5 sin 3 δ − 3 sin δ )     − J 4 8 r 4 R 4 ( 35 sin 4 δ − 30 sin 2 δ + 3 ) }</p><p>Using sin δ = sin i sin ( f + ω ) , p 2 2 = μ r − μ 2 a , and p 4 8 = 1 2 ( μ 2 r 2 − μ 2 r a + μ 2 4 a 2 )</p><p>where R is the equatorial radius of the Earth, δ is the latitude referred to the equatorial plane, i is the inclination of the orbit plane, f the true anomaly, ω the argument of perigee, and is the semi-major axis as in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. Then the Hamiltonian H g will be in the form</p><p>H g = − μ 2 a + J 2 μ 4 r 3 R 2 { θ 0 + θ 1 cos 2 ( f + ω ) }     + J 3 μ 8 r 4 R 3 { θ 2 sin ( f + ω ) + θ 3 sin 3 ( f + ω ) }     + J 4 μ 64 r 5 R 4 { θ 4 + θ 5 cos 2 ( f + ω ) + θ 6 cos 4 ( f + ω ) }</p><p>+ 1 c l 2 ( − 3 μ 2 r 2 + 2 μ 2 r a − μ 2 8 a 2 ) + J 2 c l 2 ( μ 2 R 2 2 r 4 − 3 μ 2 R 2 8 a r 3 ) { θ 0 + θ 1 cos 2 ( f + ω ) } + J 3 c l 2 ( μ 2 R 3 4 r 5 − 3 μ 2 R 3 16 a r 4 ) { θ 2 sin ( f + ω ) + θ 3 sin 3 ( f + ω ) } + J 4 c l 2 ( μ 2 R 4 32 r 6 − 3 μ 2 R 4 128 a r 5 ) { θ 4 + θ 5 cos 2 ( f + ω ) + θ 6 cos 4 ( f + ω ) } + J 2 2 c l 2 ( μ 2 R 4 32 r 6 ) { θ 7 + θ 8 cos 2 ( f + ω ) + θ 9 cos 4 ( f + ω ) }</p><p>In terms of the Delaunay set of canonical variables ( l , g , h , L , G , H ) which are defined in terms of Keplerian elements ( a , e , i , Ω , M ) by</p><p>l = M = n ( t – τ ) ;     L = μ a g = ω ;       G = μ a ( 1 − e 2 ) h = Ω ;       H = G cos i (4)</p><p>l is the mean anomaly, ω argument of perigee, Ω longitude of the node, and a , e , i are the semi-major axis, the eccentricity, and the inclination respectively. The Hamiltonian H g will be in the form</p><p>H g = − μ 2 L 2 + J 2 μ 4 4 L 6 R 2 ( a r ) 3 { θ 0 + θ 1 cos 2 ( f + g ) }     + J 3 μ 5 8 L 8 R 3 ( a r ) 4 { θ 2 sin ( f + g ) + θ 3 sin 3 ( f + g ) }     + J 4 μ 6 64 L 10 R 4 ( a r ) 5 { θ 4 + θ 5 cos 2 ( f + g ) + θ 6 cos 4 ( f + g ) }     + μ 4 c l 2 L 4 { − 3 ( a r ) 2 + 2 ( a r ) − 1 8 }</p><p>+ J 2 μ 6 c l 2 L 8 R 2 { 1 2 ( a r ) 4 − 3 8 ( a r ) 3 } { θ 0 + θ 1 cos 2 ( f + g ) } + J 3 μ 7 c l 2 L 10 R 3 { 1 4 ( a r ) 5 − 3 16 ( a r ) 4 } { θ 2 sin ( f + g ) + θ 3 sin 3 ( f + g ) } + J 4 μ 8 c l 2 L 12 R 4 { 1 32 ( a r ) 6 − 3 128 ( a r ) 5 } { θ 4 + θ 5 cos 2 ( f + g ) + θ 6 cos 4 ( f + g ) } + J 2 2 c l 2 ( μ 8 R 4 32 L 12 ) ( a r ) 6 { θ 7 + θ 8 cos 2 ( f + g ) + θ 9 cos 4 ( f + g ) } (5)</p><p>where</p><p>θ 0 = 1 − 3 c 2 , θ 1 = − 3 s 2 , θ 2 = 15 s 3 − 12 s 2 , θ 3 = − 5 s 3 , θ 4 = 9 − 90 c 2 − 105 c 4 , θ 5 = − 20 + 160 c 2 − 140 c 4 , θ 6 = 35 s 4 , θ 7 = 27 2 c 4 − 15 c 2 + 11 2 , θ 8 = − 6 + 24 c 2 − 18 c 4 , θ 9 = 9 2 s 4 , and c = cos i and s = sin i .</p><p>The Hamiltonian of the solar radiation pressure H s in terms of Delaunay elements is given by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82416-ref9">9</xref>]</p><p>H s = n ⊙ L 4 s − β L 2 μ a ⊙ 2 r a { T c cos f + T s sin f } (6)</p><p>where</p><p>T c = 1 4 ( 1 + c ) ( 1 + θ ⊙ ) cos ( g + h − l 4 s )     + 1 4 ( 1 + c ) ( 1 − θ ⊙ ) cos ( g + h + l 4 s )     + 1 4 ( 1 − c ) ( 1 + θ ⊙ ) cos ( g − h + l 4 s )     + 1 4 ( 1 − c ) ( 1 − θ ⊙ ) cos ( g − h − l 4 s )     + 1 2 s sin є { cos ( g − l 4 s ) − cos ( g + l 4 s ) }</p><p>and</p><p>T s = − 1 4 ( 1 + c ) ( 1 + θ ⊙ ) sin ( g + h − l 4 s )     − 1 4 ( 1 + c ) ( 1 − θ ⊙ ) sin ( g + h + l 4 s )     − 1 4 ( 1 − c ) ( 1 + θ ⊙ ) sin ( g − h + l 4 s )     − 1 4 ( 1 − c ) ( 1 − θ ⊙ ) sin ( g − h − l 4 s )     − 1 2 s sin є { sin ( g − l 4 s ) − sin ( g + l 4 s ) }</p><p>l 4 s = k s = n ⊙ t ( n ⊙ is the solar mean motion of order unity rather than O ( H s ) ), L 4 s = K s is the conjugate of L 4 s which will be found from</p><p>L 4 s = − ∂ H s ∂ l 4 s , θ ⊙ = cos є , є is the obliquity of the ecliptic, and β is constant</p><p>which represents satellite area to mass ratio corresponding to a spherical satellite.</p><p>Finally the Hamiltonian of the gravitational waves H w in terms of Delaunay elements is given by</p><p>H w = n w L 4 w + ϵ L 4 r 2 a 2 { s 2 8 [ cos ( 2 h + l 4 w + α 1 ) − cos ( 2 h − l 4 w − α 1 )     − A g [ sin ( 2 h + l 4 w + α 2 ) + sin ( 2 h − l 4 w − α 2 ) ] ]     + ( c 2 16 + c 8 − 1 16 ) [ cos ( 2 f + 2 g + 2 h + l 4 w + α 1 )     + cos ( 2 f + 2 g + 2 h − l 4 w − α 1 ) − A g [ sin ( 2 f + 2 g + 2 h + l 4 w + α 2 )</p><p>    + sin ( 2 f + 2 g + 2 h − l 4 w − α 2 ) + sin ( 2 f + 2 g − 2 h + l 4 w + α 2 )     + sin ( 2 f + 2 g − 2 h − l 4 w − α 2 ) ] ] + ( c 2 16 − c 8 + 1 16 ) &#215; [ cos ( 2 f + 2 g − 2 h + l 4 w + α 1 ) + cos ( 2 f + 2 g − 2 h − l 4 w − α 1 ) ] } (7)</p><p>where ϵ = 1 2 n w 2 h x and A g = − h x h + , n w is the frequency of the wave. α 1 and</p><p>α 2 are the phase difference, h + and h x are the amplitudes of the wave in the two orthogonal directions in the transverse plane. l 4 w = k w = n w t , L 4 w = K w is</p><p>the conjugate of l 4 w which will be found from L 4 w = − ∂ H s ∂ l 4 w .</p><p>According to Equations (5), (6), and (7) we can write the Hamiltonian H in (1) as</p><p>H = H 0 + ∑ n = 1 3 є n n ! H n</p><p>where є is the small parameter of the expansion which represents the second zonal harmonic J 2 of the Earth’s potential, and</p><p>H 0 = − μ 2 2 L 2 (8)</p><p>H 1 = − A 1 L 6 ( a r ) 3 { θ 0 + θ 1 cos 2 ( f + g ) } + n ⊙ L 4 s + n w L 4 w (9)</p><p>H 2 = H 21 + H 22 + H 23 + H 24 + H 25 (10)</p><p>H 21 = A 21 L 8 ( a r ) 4 { θ 2 sin ( f + g ) + θ 3 sin 3 ( f + g ) } (11)</p><p>H 22 = A 22 L 10 ( a r ) 5 { θ 4 + θ 5 cos 2 ( f + g ) + θ 6 cos 4 ( f + g ) } (12)</p><p>H 23 = A 23 L 4 { − 3 ( a r ) 2 + 2 ( a r ) − 1 8 } (13)</p><p>H 24 = A 24 L 2 r a { T c cos f + T s sin f } (14)</p><p>H 25 = A 25 L 4 r 2 a 2 { s 2 8 [ cos ( 2 h + l 4 w + α 1 ) − cos ( 2 h − l 4 w − α 1 )     − A g [ sin ( 2 h + l 4 w + α 2 ) + sin ( 2 h − l 4 w − α 2 ) ] ]     + ( c 2 16 + c 8 − 1 16 ) [ cos ( 2 f + 2 g + 2 h + l 4 w + α 1 )     + cos ( 2 f + 2 g + 2 h − l 4 w − α 1 ) − A g [ sin ( 2 f + 2 g + 2 h + l 4 w + α 2 )</p><p>    + sin ( 2 f + 2 g + 2 h − l 4 w − α 2 ) + sin ( 2 f + 2 g − 2 h + l 4 w + α 2 )     + sin ( 2 f + 2 g − 2 h − l 4 w − α 2 ) ] + ( c 2 16 − c 8 + 1 16 ) &#215; [ cos ( 2 f + 2 g − 2 h + l 4 w + α 1 ) + cos ( 2 f + 2 g − 2 h − l 4 w − α 1 ) ] } (15)</p><p>H 3 = A 3 L 8 { 1 2 ( a r ) 4 − 3 8 ( a r ) 3 } { θ 0 + θ 1 cos 2 ( f + g ) } (16)</p><p>For different orders of J 2 , the coefficients A’s are</p><p>A 1 = μ 4 4 R 4 , A 21 = J 3 μ 5 4 J 2 2 R 3 , A 22 = J 4 μ 6 32 J 2 2 R 4 , A 23 = 2 ! μ 6 c l 2 J 2 2 R 2 ,</p><p>A 24 = − β J 2 2 μ a ⊙ 2 , A 25 = 1 2 n w 2 h x J 2 2 μ , A 3 = 3 ! μ 6 c l 2 J 2 2 R 2 .</p><p>The second-order term in the Hamiltonian H which is given in Equation (10) is consisting of the non-relativistic terms H 21 , H 22 , the relativistic term H 23 , the terms of solar radiation pressure H 24 and the terms of gravitational waves H 25 .The third order term H 3 is representing the mixed perturbation due to Newtonian quadruple field and Schwarzschild acceleration.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. The Algorithm of Solution</title><p>Let the considered system of differential equations in terms of canonical elements under the effect of solar radiation pressure and GW are</p><p>d L i d t = − ∂ H ∂ l i ;     d l i d t = ∂ H ∂ L i       ( i = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ) (17)</p><p>where L i and l i are the set of the Delaunay variable in Equation (4). H is the Hamiltonian in equations from (9) to (16).We use Lie transform to solve our problem [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82416-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82416-ref11">11</xref>] . This method is one of the canonical perturbation methods proposed to build successive canonical transformation for Hamiltonian systems depending on a small parameter based on the consideration of Lie series and Lie transform. The system of Equation (17) will be solved up to order three in secular terms by performing two successive canonical transformation ( l i , L i ; є ) → ( l ′ i , L ′ i ) and ( l ′ i , L ′ i ; є ) → ( l ″ i , L ″ i ) analytic in є at є = 0 to eliminate the short and long period terms, respectively from the Hamiltonian, where the primes indicate the transformed variables. The transformed Hamiltonians are in the form</p><p>H * ( − , l 2 , − , L i ; є ) = H 0 ∗ ( L i ) + ∑ n = 1 є n n ! H n ∗ ( − , L i ) (18)</p><p>H * * ( − , L i ; є ) = H 0 ∗ ∗ ( L i ) + ∑ n = 1 є n n ! H n ∗ ∗ ( − , L i ) (19)</p><p>With generators W and W * expandable as</p><p>W ( l i , L i ; є ) = ∑ n = 0 є n n ! W n + 1 ( l i , L i ) (20)</p><p>W * ( − , l 2 , l 3 , L i ; є ) = ∑ n = 0 є n n ! W n + 1 ∗ ( − , l 2 , l 3 , L i ) (21)</p><p>The algorithm for eliminating the short-period terms (i.e. those depending on l and l 4 ) determining the new Hamiltonian H * and the generator W is</p><p>Zero order: H 0 ∗ = H 0</p><p>First order: H 1 ∗ = H 1 s</p><p>W 1 = L ′ 3 μ 3 ∫ H 1 p d l ′</p><p>Second order: H 2 ∗ = H 2 s + { H 1 + H 1 ∗ , W 1 } s</p><p>W 2 = L ′ 3 μ 3 ∫ ​ ( H 2 p + { H 1 + H 1 ∗ , W 1 } p ) d l ′</p><p>Third order: H 3 ∗ = H 3 s + { H 2 , W 1 } s + 2 { H 2 ∗ , W 1 } s + { H 1 , W 2 } s     + { H 1 ∗ , W 2 } s − { { H 1 ∗ , W 1 } , W 1 } s</p><p>where the brackets represent Poisson bracket and subscripts s and p indicates the secular (averaged over l ′ 1 and l ′ 4 ) and periodic parts in l ′ . The remaining long-period problem is then governed by a Hamiltonian depending only on ( L ′ , G ′ , H ′ and g). The second algorithm of canonical transformation to remove the long-period terms (i.e. those depending on g ′ ) and determining the new Hamiltonian H * * and the generating function W * is given by</p><p>Zero order: H 0 ∗ ∗ = H 0</p><p>First order: H 1 ∗ ∗ = H 1 ∗</p><p>Second order: H 2 ∗ ∗ = H 2 ∗</p><p>W 1 ∗ = − 1 2 ∂ H 1 − 1 ∂ G ∫ ​ H 2 p ∗ d g ″</p><p>Third order:</p><p>H 3 * * = H 3 * + { H 2 * , W 1 ∗ } s + 2 { H 2 * * , W 1 ∗ } s + 2 { H 1 ∗ , W 2 * } s − { { H 1 * * , W 1 ∗ } , W 1 ∗ } s</p><p>W 2 * = − 1 3 ∂ H 1 − 1 ∂ G ∫ ( { H 2 * , W 1 ∗ } p + 2 { H 2 * * , W 1 ∗ } p + 2 { H 1 ∗ , W 2 * } p     − { { H 1 * * , W 1 ∗ } , W 1 ∗ } p ) d g ″</p><p>where the subscripts s and p indicates the secular (averaged over g ′ ) and the periodic parts in g ″ . Finally, the remaining secular problem, being independent of all angle variables. The elements of the short period are obtained from</p><p>l i = l ′ i + є l ′ i 1 + 1 2 є 2 l ′ i 2       ( i = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ) L i = L ′ i + є L ′ i 1 + 1 2 є 2 + L ′ i 2 (22)</p><p>where l ′ i 1 = ∂ W 1 ∂ L ′ i and L ′ i 1 = − ∂ W 1 ∂ l ′ i</p><p>l ′ i 2 = ∂ W 2 ∂ L ′ i + { l ′ i 1 , W 1 } and L ′ i 1 = − ∂ W 2 ∂ l ′ i + { L ′ i 2 , W 1 } (23)</p><p>the prime indicate the transformed terms. For the inverse transformations</p><p>l i 1 = − l ′ i 1</p><p>l i 2 = − l ′ i 2 + 2 { l ′ i 1 , W 1 }</p><p>L i 1 = − L ′ i 1</p><p>L i 2 = − L ′ i 2 + 2 { L ′ i 1 , W 1 } (24)</p><p>Similarly for the elements of the long period. The secular terms will obtained from the substitution of the new transformed Hamiltonian H * and H * * in Equations (18) and (19) into the Equation (17). These algorithms are actually very simple, but calculating them by hand is laborious, therefore, all computations were carried out by computer program, using the algebraic manipulation language MATHMATICA V10.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Third Order Solution</title><p>We employ the previous algorithms to obtain analytical expressions for the short-period and long-period terms of the orbital elements; the solution is expressed in terms of the Delaunay variables. We obtain the following results.</p><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. The Short-Period Terms</title><p>Zero order: H 0 ∗ = − μ 2 2 L 2 (25)</p><p>First order: H 1 ∗ = A 1 θ 0 L 3 G 3 + n ⊙ L 4 s + n w L 4 w (26)</p><p>W 1 = A 1 μ 2 G 3 { θ 0 ( f − l + e sin f ) + θ 1 2 [ sin 2 ( f + g )     + e 3 sin ( 3 f + 2 g ) + e sin ( f + 2 g ) ] } (27)</p><p>Second order: H 2 ∗ = H 20 ∗ + H 21 ∗ + H 22 ∗ + H 23 ∗ + H 24 ∗ + H 25 ∗</p><p>where H 20 ∗ , H 21 ∗ , and H 22 ∗ are coming from Newtonian effect, H 23 ∗ re- presents the relativistic effect, H 24 ∗ is coming from the solar radiation pressure, and H 25 ∗ is coming from GW</p><p>H 20 ∗ = A 1 2 μ 2 { ( − 105 4 c 4 − 15 2 c 2 + 15 4 ) η 37 + ( − 15 4 c 4 − 27 2 c 2 + 15 4 ) η 55     + ( − 27 c 4 + 18 c 2 − 3 ) η 46 + e 2 ( − 45 4 c 4 + 24 c 2 − 3 2 ) η 37 cos 2 g } (28)</p><p>H 21 ∗ = A 21 { 3 e η 35 s ( 1 − 5 c 2 ) } sin g (29)</p><p>H 22 ∗ = A 22 { ( 105 c 4 − 90 c 2 + 9 ) ( 5 2 η 37 − 3 2 η 55 )             + e 2 ( − 105 c 4 + 120 c 2 − 15 ) η 37 cos 2 g } (30)</p><p>H 23 ∗ = A 23 ( 3 η 31 − 15 8 η 40 ) (31)</p><p>H 24 ∗ = 3 2 A 24 e L 2 T c (32)</p><p>H 25 ∗ = A 25 L 4 { ( 1 + 1 2 e 2 ) s 2 8 [ cos ( 2 h + l 4 w + α 1 ) − cos ( 2 h − l 4 w − α 1 )     − A g [ sin ( 2 h + l 4 w + α 2 ) + sin ( 2 h − l 4 w − α 2 ) ] ] + ( c 2 16 + c 8 − 1 16 )     &#215; ( − 1 2 + 2 e 2 ) [ cos ( 2 g + 2 h + l 4 w + α 1 ) + cos ( 2 g + 2 h − l 4 w − α 1 ) ]     + ( c 2 16 − c 8 + 1 16 ) ( − 1 2 + 2 e 2 ) [ cos ( 2 g − 2 h + l 4 w + α 1 )         + cos ( 2 g − 2 h − l 4 w − α 1 ) ] } (33)</p><p>where η i j = L − i G − j (i and j are integers), and the corresponding generators are</p><p>W 20 = A 1 2 μ 4 { ∑ n = 1 6 ∑ m = − 1 2 b 1 n m s sin ( n f + 2 m g ) + ( f − l ) ∑ n = 0 3 ∑ m = 0 1 b 1 n m c cos ( n f + 2 m g ) } (34)</p><p>W 21 = A 21 μ 2 { ∑ n = 1 5 ∑ m = 0 2 b 2 n m c cos ( n f + ( 2 m − 1 ) g ) + e ( f − l ) ( 15 s 3 − 12 s ) η 05 sin g } (35)</p><p>W 22 = A 22 μ 2 { ∑ n = 1 7 ∑ m = − 1 2 b 3 n m s sin ( n f + 2 m g ) + ( f − l ) [ ( 105 c 4 − 90 c 2 + 9 )     &#215; ( 5 2 η 07 − 3 2 η 55 ) + e 2 ( − 105 c 4 + 120 c 2 − 15 ) η 07 cos 2 g ] } (36)</p><p>W 23 = A 23 μ 2 { 3 η 01 ( f − l ) − 2 η 10 ( E − l ) } (37)</p><p>W 24 = − A 24 μ 2 L 5 { [ ( 1 − 1 2 e 2 ) sin E − e 4 sin 2 E ] T c     + [ ( 1 2 e 2 − 1 ) cos E + ( e 4 − e 3 8 ) cos 2 E ] T s } (38)</p><p>W 25 = A 25 L 4 { [ ( 1 + 1 2 e 2 ) sin E + 1 2 sin 2 E − 2 e sin E ] s 2 8 [ cos ( 2 h + l 4 w + α 1 )     − cos ( 2 h − l 4 w − α 1 ) − A g [ sin ( 2 h + l 4 w + α 2 ) + sin ( 2 h − l 4 w − α 2 ) ] ]     + ( c 2 16 + c 8 − 1 16 ) { [ ( 1 2 + 2 e 2 ) sin E + 1 2 sin 2 E − 2 e sin E ]     &#215; [ cos ( 2 g + 2 h + l 4 w + α 1 ) + c 8 cos ( 2 g + 2 h − l 4 w − α 1 ) ]</p><p>    − ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 2 [ 2 e cos E − 1 2 cos E ] [ sin ( 2 g + 2 h + l 4 w + α 1 )     + sin ( 2 g + 2 h − l 4 w − α 1 ) ] + 2 A g ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 2 [ 2 e cos E − 1 2 cos E ]     &#215; [ cos ( 2 g + 2 h + l 4 w + α 2 ) + cos ( 2 g + 2 h − l 4 w − α 2 ) + cos ( 2 g − 2 h + l 4 w + α 2 ) + cos ( 2 g − 2 h − l 4 w − α 2 ) ] }</p><p>    + ( c 2 16 − c 8 + 1 16 ) { [ ( 1 2 + 2 e 2 ) sin E + 1 2 sin 2 E − 2 e sin E ]     &#215; [ cos ( 2 g − 2 h + l 4 w + α 1 ) + cos ( 2 g − 2 h − l 4 w − α 1 ) ]     + ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 2 [ 2 e cos E − 1 2 cos E ] [ sin ( 2 g − 2 h + l 4 w + α 1 ) + sin ( 2 g − 2 h − l 4 w − α 1 ) ] } } (39)</p><p>where E is the eccentric anomaly and the (b) coefficients are coefficients depend on the eccentricity, c and s (i.e. the inclination) and these coefficients is</p><p>coming from the expansion of a r , a r cos f , a r sin f in the Hamiltonian H</p><p>Third order:</p><p>H 3 ∗ = A 3 { ( 1 − 5 c 2 ) ( 3 4 η 35 − 5 8 η 53 ) + 3 8 e 2 ( c 2 − 1 ) η 35 cos 2 g }     + A 1 A 21 μ 2 { ( 1 − 3 c 2 ) ( − 45 η 35 + 36 η 53 − 27 η 44 ) + [ 27 e 2 ( 1 − c 2 ) η 35     + 6 ( c 2 − 1 ) e 2 ( 3 η 35 + 3 η 53 − 9 η 44 + 3 η 7 ) ] } cos 2 g + A 24 μ 2 n ⊙ L 1 5 ( 3 e 2 − 3 e 3 4 ) T ′ s ( l 4 ⊙ )     − A 25 L 4 n w { [ ( 2 + e 2 ) s 2 8 [ − A g [ cos ( 2 h + l 4 w + α 2 ) + cos ( 2 h − l 4 w − α 2 ) ] ]     + ( c 2 16 + c 8 − 1 16 ) { − 4 e ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 2 ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 2 [ cos ( 2 g + 2 h + l 4 w + α 1 ) + cos ( 2 g + 2 h − l 4 w − α 1 ) ] } + ( c 2 16 − c 8 + 1 16 ) { − 4 e ( 1 − e 2 ) 1 2 &#215; [ cos ( 2 g − 2 h + l 4 w + α 1 ) + cos ( 2 g − 2 h − l 4 w − α 1 ) ] } } (40)</p><p>This order represents the joint effects of the relativistic effect and the solar radiation pressure and GW effects, T ′ s ( l 4 ⊙ ) is the differentiation of T s with respect to l 4 ⊙ . From the generators W 1 and W 2 we can determine the elements of the short-period transformation and its inverse according to the Equations (22) and (23).</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. The Long-Period Terms</title><p>We now proceed to performing a second canonical transformation to eliminate g ′ , h ′ , l ′ 4 ⊙ , l ′ 4 w (the argument of perigee, the longitude of node and the augmentation variable of the mean motion of the Sun n ⊙ and the frequency of the gravitational waves n w ) from the Hamiltonian. This transformation contains the long-periodic perturbations, whereas the secular terms will be derived from the canonical equations of motion and the final Hamiltonian H * * . For the simplicity of writing we dropped the primes.</p><p>Zero order: H 0 ∗ ∗ = − μ 2 2 L 2 (41)</p><p>First order: H 1 ∗ ∗ = A 1 θ 0 L 3 G 3 (42)</p><p>Second order:</p><p>H 20 ∗ ∗ = A 1 2 μ 2 { ( − 105 4 c 4 − 15 2 c 2 + 15 4 ) η 37 + ( − 15 4 c 4 − 27 2 c 2 + 15 4 ) η 55             + ( − 27 c 4 + 18 c 2 − 3 ) η 46 } (43)</p><p>H 21 ∗ ∗ = 0 (44)</p><p>H 22 ∗ = A 22 { ( 105 c 4 − 90 c 2 + 9 ) ( 5 2 η 37 − 3 2 η 55 ) } (45)</p><p>H 23 ∗ = A 23 ( 3 η 31 − 15 8 η 40 ) (46)</p><p>H 24 ∗ = 0 (47)</p><p>H 25 ∗ = 0 (48)</p><p>The corresponding generators coming from the Newtonian effect, the relativistic effect, the solar radiation pressure effect and gravitational waves effect are respectively</p><p>W 1 N * = A 1 μ 2 − 15 c 4 + 16 c 2 − 1 40 c 2 − 8 η 03 sin 2 g + A 21 2 A 1 e s η 01 cos g     + A 22 A 1 − 35 c 4 + 40 c 2 − 5 40 c 2 − 4 η 03 sin 2 g (49)</p><p>W 1 r * = 0 (50)</p><p>W 1 s * = 3 4 A 24 n ⊙ e L 2 { − 1 4 ( 1 + c ) ( 1 + θ ⊙ ) sin ( g + h − l 4 s )     − 1 4 ( 1 + c ) ( 1 − θ ⊙ ) sin ( g + h + l 4 s )     − 1 4 ( 1 − c ) ( 1 + θ ⊙ ) sin ( g − h + l 4 s )     − 1 4 ( 1 − c ) ( 1 − θ ⊙ ) sin ( g − h − l 4 s )     − 1 2 s sin є { sin ( g − l 4 s ) − sin ( g + l 4 s ) } } (51)</p><p>W 1 w * = − 1 4 A 25 n w L 4 { ( c 2 16 + c 8 − 1 16 ) ( − 1 2 + 2 e 2 ) [ sin ( 2 g + 2 h + l 4 w + α 1 )     + sin ( 2 g + 2 h − l 4 w − α 1 ) ] + ( c 2 16 − c 8 + 1 16 ) ( − 1 2 + 2 e 2 ) &#215; [ sin ( 2 g − 2 h + l 4 w + α 1 ) + sin ( 2 g − 2 h − l 4 w − α 1 ) ] } (52)</p><p>Third order: H 3 * * = H 3 r * * + H 3 s * * + H 3 s r * * + H 3 s w * *</p><p>where</p><p>H 3 r * * = A 3 { ( 1 − 3 c 2 ) ( 3 4 η 35 − 5 8 η 53 ) }     + A 1 A 23 μ 2 { ( 1 − 3 c 2 ) ( − 45 η 35 + 36 η 53 − 27 η 44 ) } (53)</p><p>H 3 s * * = − 27 64 A 24 2 n ⊙ { ( e + e 3 2 ) [ s 2 2 ( 1 + c ⊙ 2 ) c 2 sin 2 є ]     − 1 4 ( 1 e − e 2 ) [ ( 1 + c ⊙ ) 2 ( 1 − c ) 2 + ( 1 − c ⊙ ) 2 ( 1 + c ) 2 − 4 s 2 sin є ] } (54)</p><p>H 3 s r * * = 0 (55)</p><p>H 3 s w * * = 0 (56)</p><p>The relativistic generator, the solar radiation pressure generator and the generator of the joint effect of the relativity with the solar radiation pressure and the joint effect of the solar radiation pressure with GW will be respectively</p><p>W 2 r * = A 3 A 1 { e ( c 2 − 1 ) 48 ( 5 c 2 − 1 ) η 79 } sin 2 g + A 23 μ 2 { 3 e 2 ( 1 − c 2 ) 2 ( 5 c 2 − 1 ) η 69     + ( c 2 − 1 ) 3 e 2 ( 5 c 2 − 1 ) ( 3 η 69 + 3 η 87 − 9 η 78 + 3 η 10 , 4 )     − 1 8 ( 5 c 2 − 1 ) ( − 15 c 2 + 16 c 2 − 1 ) η 01 } sin 2 g     + A 21 A 23 A 1 2 { − e s 10 c 2 − 2 η 0 , − 1 } cos g     + A 22 A 23 A 1 2 { − 1 4 ( 5 c 2 − 1 ) 2 ( − 35 c 4 + 40 c 2 − 5 ) η 0 , 1 } sin 2 g (57)</p><p>− 1 2 s sin є { sin ( g − l 4 s ) − sin ( g + l 4 s ) } } + A 24 2 n ⊙ 2 { ∑ n = − 2 2 ∑ m = − 2 2 Λ 1 n m sin ( n h + m l 4 s ) + Λ 2 n m sin ( 2 g + n h + m l 4 s ) } ,       m ≠ 0 , &#177; 1 ,   n ≠ 0 (58)</p><p>W 2 r s * = 9 4 A 23 A 24 n ⊙ 2 e η 12 { 1 4 ( 1 + c ) ( 1 + θ ⊙ ) sin ( g + h − l 4 s )     + 1 4 ( 1 + c ) ( 1 − θ ⊙ ) sin ( g + h + l 4 s )     + 1 4 ( 1 − c ) ( 1 + θ ⊙ ) sin ( g − h + l 4 s )     + 1 4 ( 1 − c ) ( 1 − θ ⊙ ) sin ( g − h − l 4 s )     + 1 2 s sin є { sin ( g − l 4 s ) − sin ( g + l 4 s ) } } (59)</p><p>W 2 s w * = 3 8 A 24 A 25 n ⊙ n w e L 6 { 1 4 ( 1 + c ) ( 1 + θ ⊙ ) sin ( g + h − l 4 s )     + 1 4 ( 1 + c ) ( 1 − θ ⊙ ) sin ( g + h + l 4 s )     + 1 4 ( 1 − c ) ( 1 + θ ⊙ ) sin ( g − h + l 4 s )     + 1 4 ( 1 − c ) ( 1 − θ ⊙ ) sin ( g − h − l 4 s )</p><p>    + 1 2 s sin є { sin ( g − l 4 s ) − sin ( g + l 4 s ) } } { ( c 2 16 + c 8 − 1 16 )     &#215; ( − 1 2 + 2 e 2 ) [ sin ( 2 g + 2 h + l 4 w + α 1 ) + sin ( 2 g + 2 h − l 4 w − α 1 ) ]     + ( c 2 16 − c 8 + 1 16 ) ( − 1 2 + 2 e 2 ) [ sin ( 2 g − 2 h + l 4 w + α 1 )     + sin ( 2 g − 2 h − l 4 w − α 1 ) ] + ( 1 + 1 2 e 2 ) s 2 8 [ cos ( 2 h + l 4 w + α 1 )         − cos ( 2 h − l 4 w − α 1 ) − A g [ sin ( 2 h + l 4 w + α 2 ) + sin ( 2 h − l 4 w − α 2 ) ] ] } (60)</p><p>The elements of the transformation may be obtained from Equations (22), (23) and (24), replacing W n by W n * , ( l j , L j ) by ( l ′ j , L ′ j ) and ( l ′ j , L ′ j ) by ( l ″ j , L ″ j ) with l j = ( l , g , h , l 4 ⊙ , l 4 w ) and L j = ( L , G , H , L 4 ⊙ , L 4 w ) . Since the relativistic generator W 2 r * depends on the angle variables ( L , G , H , g ) , the solar radiation pressure generator W 2 s * depends on ( L , G , H , L 4 ⊙ , g , h , l 4 ⊙ ) ; the generator of their joint effects W 2 r s * depends on ( L , G , H , L 4 ⊙ , g , h , l 4 ⊙ ) , and the generator of joint effect of solar radiation pressure and gravitational waves W 2 s w * depends on ( L , G , H , L 4 w , g , h , l 4 w ) then we found that there is long-period perturbation in all elements of the orbit due to the relativistic effect, the solar radiation pressure effect, and the joint effect of solar radiation pressure and gravitational waves, except the semi-major axis.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. The Secular Terms</title><p>Now both short and long-period terms have been eliminated, the new Hamiltonian H * * contains no angular variables ( l , g , h , l 4 ⊙ , l 4 w ), therefore according to Equations (53), (54), (55), (56), and (17), the action variables L ″ , G ″ , H ″ are constants (consequently the semi-major axis a, the eccentricity e, and the inclination i have no secular effects due to the joint of relativistic effect and solar radiation pressure effect and the joint effect of SRP and GW), and the angular variables l ″ , g ″ , h ″ (have secular effects due to the joint effect of SRP and GW) are expressed in the form</p><p>l ″ i = l ″ i 0 + c t (61)</p><p>where</p><p>c i = d l i d t = ∂ H * * ∂ L ″ i</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion and Discussion</title><p>In this work, we analyze analytically and investigate the coupling effects between solar radiation pressure and gravitational waves. All calculations of the short- period, and long-period were obtained up to the order three in J 2 (earth’s zonal harmonic), which represents the coupling between the relativistic effect and the influence of direct solar radiation pressure and the coupling between solar radiation pressure and the influence of gravitational waves. The present work concerned only with the terms arising from solar radiation pressure effects and its coupling with gravitational waves effects. We found that these effects cause second order long-period perturbations in all the elements of the sun- synchronous orbit except the semi-major axis, and short-period perturbations from the second order in all the elements of the orbit (the eccentricity, inclination, ascending node, argument of perigee, and semi-major). The secular perturbations will be in the Ω , ω . Consequently these perturbations will cause disturbance in the sun-synchronism. Also we found that the perturbation or the behavior of gravitational waves almost the same as the perturbation or the behavior of solar radiation pressure and their coupling will incorporate the sun-syn- chronism through the secular rate of the ascending node precession. The above perturbation properties provide the good and interesting results for studying gravitational waves through its coupling effects with solar radiation pressure and also for the precise determination of satellite orbit.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Youssef, M.H.A. (2018) Solar Radiation Pressure and Gravitational Waves Effects on Sun-Synchronous Orbits. World Journal of Mechanics, 8, 11- 25. https://doi.org/10.4236/wjm.2018.82002</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.82416-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kozai, Y. (1961) Effects of Solar-Radiation Pressure on the Motion of an Aritificial Satellite, Smithsonian Astrophys. Obs. Spec. Rep., 56.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82416-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aksnes, K. (1976) Short-Period and Long-Period Perturbations of a Spherical Satellite Due to Direct solar Radiation. Celestial Mechanics, 89.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82416-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hough, M. (1981) Sun-Synchronous Orbits near Critical Inclination. Celestial Mechanics, 111, 137-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01230515</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82416-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Youssef, M.H. (2005) Relativistic Effects on Sun-Synchronous Orbits including the Influence of Direct Solar Radiation Pressure. Bulletin of Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, 73, 53-75.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82416-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Youssef</surname><given-names> M.H. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2017</year>)<article-title>Short-Period and Long-Period Effects of Weak Gravitational Waves</article-title><source> IJAA</source><volume> 7</volume>,<fpage> 230</fpage>-<lpage>237</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82416-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Youssef</surname><given-names> M.H. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2017</year>)<article-title>Semi-Analytical Theory of the Mean Orbital Motion Due to the Effect of Gravitational Waves</article-title><source> EJSR</source><volume> 147</volume>,<fpage> 342</fpage>-<lpage>350</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82416-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Will, C. (1981) Theory and Experiment in Gravitational Physics. Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82416-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fitzpatrick, P. (1970) Principles of Celestial Mechanics, Academic Press, New York and London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82416-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hori, G. (1966) The Effect of Radiation Pressure on the Motion of an Artificial Satellite, Space Mathematics, American Mathematical Society.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82416-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hori, G. (1966) Theory of General Perturbations with Unspecified Canonical Variables. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 18, 287.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82416-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kamel, A.A. (1969) Expansion Formulae in Canonical Transformations Depending on a Small Parameter. Celestial Mechanics, 1, 19. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01228838</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>