<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Geology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-7570</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojg.2018.81005</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJG-82140</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Topography of the Moho Undulation in Cameroon from Gravity Data: Preliminary Insights into the Origin, the Age and the Structure of the Crust and the Upper Mantle across Cameroon and Adjacent Areas
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Albert</surname><given-names>Eyike</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Françoise</surname><given-names>Enyegue A. Nyam</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Charles</surname><given-names>Antoine Basseka</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Earth Science, Faculty of Science, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>aeyike@gmail.com(AE)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>15</day><month>01</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>65</fpage><lpage>85</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>28,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>27,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2018</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>30,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2018</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial International License (CC BY-NC).http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In this paper, the complete Bouguer anomaly data from Cameroon and part of the neighboring countries has been examined to compute the topography of the Moho undulations. This work is based on an improved filtering technique and an appropriate density contrast between the crust and the upper mantle. Comparison with seismic data shows that our Moho map defines better the continuity and morphology of the crust-mantle interface than the scattered seismic data in Cameroon. The present relief map, although may not give real depths at some areas provides a better surface correlation with the surface geology better than seismic techniques. Comparison between the Moho undulations and the topography maps reveals that the crust in Cameroon seems to not be in isostatic equilibrium. The Moho in the Central African Shear Zone (CASZ) must be linked with different dextral movements during the opening of the south Atlantic in the Cretaceous time. In the Chad basin, the Moho is associated to the opening of the central and south Atlantic ~130 Ma. In the case of the Congo basin, the Moho undulations are related to the post rift subsidence. The correlation between the Moho undulations map with the surface geology indicates that the actual morphology of the crust mantle interface in Cameroon can be related to the build-up of the West and Central African rift system dating back to the Early Cretaceous to Palaeogene, where the presence of intraplate tensional stresses reactivated previous shear zones of lithospheric weakness during the break up of Gondwana.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Crustal Instabilities</kwd><kwd> Gravity Anomaly</kwd><kwd> Moho Undulations</kwd><kwd> Cameroon</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The crustal structure knowledge is vital in geophysics, because it provides insights into the geohistory, tectonic environment and geohazard limitation ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref3">3</xref>] ). There is little knowledge about the crust in Cameroon in comparison to other countries in East Africa. The only published crustal thickness map of Cameroon and surrounding areas was prepared by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref4">4</xref>] . However, this map is produced with a processing technique which averages the Moho so much that it is hard to correlate the Moho undulations with the surface geology. Further, this map is based on a very uneven distribution of data and the calculated depths are impossible in some places as they show important gaps with the deep seismic refraction data. Recently, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref5">5</xref>] presented the structure of the crust in Cameroon using the joint inversion of Rayleigh wave group velocities and receiver functions. However, this study mainly focuses on the CVL in the expense of other places where the crust structure is not well constrained.</p><p>Estimates of crustal structure and Moho depth in particular, place preliminary constraints on geochemical and tectonic processes that have led to crustal formation and evolution. Thus, improved estimates of crustal structure in Cameroon are needed.</p><p>In this study, we investigate crustal structure of Cameroon and adjacent regions in using a set of 2.5D gravity models of this area. These gravity models are constrained using available seismic, geological and petrophysical data interpretation.</p><p>By using this approach, it is possible to compute the entire map of the Moho undulation over Cameroon. The aim is to obtain preliminary insights into the origin, the age and the structure of the crust and the upper mantle across Cameroon and adjacent areas.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Geology and Tectonic Background of Cameroon</title><p>The comprehensive background of the geology and tectonic setting of the study area (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a)) is summarized in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref7">7</xref>] . The geology mainly consists of distinct units covering from the Archean to the Cenozoic. The Precambrian basement of Cameroon is covered by Cretaceous to Cenozoic sedimentary formations. Most of these sediments rocks are found the Chad basin, including the Benue trough, the Garoua and the northern Chad basins, north of the area of study. Stratigraphic studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref8">8</xref>] showed that basement main rocks types are granite, charnockite and gneiss and they may be split in two units: 1) the Central African Shear Zone (CASZ) to the north, which belongs to the Oubanguides mobile belt and extends ENE-WSW to the Darfour region of Soudan by crossing</p><p>Cameroon and the Central African Republic (CAR), 2) the Archean Congo craton to the south, covers a large area and where it is known as the Ntem complex. The northern end of Congo craton is still controversial. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref9">9</xref>] believe that there is a contact between the Pan African rocks and the Ntem complex along this boundary where they two form together an intracrustal discontinuity.</p><p>North of the Central African Shear Zone (CASZ) is the Cameroon Volcanic Line (CVL) a long chain Cenozoic feature which trends southwest to northeast and long of about 1700 km (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a)). The absence of sufficient age progression and the occurrence of sporadic magma rise along the CVL volcanic centers have favored different possible models for the origin of the CVL including and well summarized in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref10">10</xref>] . Ring complexes, with diameter ranging from 1 - 10 km are usually associated with the CVL. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref12">12</xref>] have reported the presence of more than 60 of these plutonic complexes in Cameroon where they are also known as “Granites Ultimes”. These complexes comprise different rock types including granites and syenites. Mt Cameroon, southernmost of the CVL (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a)) is the largest volcano of the continental sector of the CVL with a high of about 4100 meters, and a recurrent deep seismicity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref15">15</xref>] . In central Cameroon, there is the domal uplift of the Adamawa Plateau. It is the northeastern end of the CVL which uplifted in the Tertiary up to 1 km compared to the surrounding area [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref16">16</xref>] . Its volcanic activity has arise from Neogene to Recent times and mostly composed of phonolites, trachytes and alkali basalt [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref17">17</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Gravity Data and Processing Techniques</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Data</title><p>The gravity dataset is extracted from the World Gravity Map (WGM) and made available by the Bureau Gravim&#233;trique International (BGI). This gravity anomaly map is computed in spherical geometry, and takes into account a realistic Earth model. It results from the Earth gravity models (EGM2008, DTU10) and contains high resolution terrain corrections including contribution of most surface masses (atmosphere, oceans, land, inland seas, ice caps ice shelves and lakes). Such gravity anomaly (2' &#215; 2' resolution) which enhances the density heterogeneities in the Earth’s interior (crust, mantle∙∙∙) helps in many applications including geophysics, structural geology, geodesy (shape of the Earth, geoid), and exploration of natural resources (oil or mining prospecting) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref18">18</xref>] (Bonvalot et al., 2012). Accurate computations at global scale have been performed using theoretical developments spherical harmonic [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref19">19</xref>] .</p><p>The resulting Bouguer anomaly map is shown on <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(b).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Filtering</title><p>The purpose of the present paper is the construction of the morphology pattern of the crustal-mantle interface. It is therefore necessary to remove short wavelength signals due to intracrustal sources and long wavelength signals caused by asthenospheric sources.</p><p>For this purpose, we analyze the anomalies using bidimensional filters, as described in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref23">23</xref>] . In order to obtain the suitable results, it was useful to evaluate based on geological criteria, a series of filtered fields, derived from a number of different cut-off wavelengths. Similar to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref20">20</xref>] we compute a set of filtered maps, adopting cut-off wavelengths (λ) varying from 200 to 700 km.</p><p>In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(a), the filtered map of wavelength above 200 km, it is possible that this map still reflects some local perturbations due to shallower structures like the series of small local gravity anomalies in the Central and Northern Cameroon, whereas the gravity signal map of wavelength above 300 km (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(b)) possibly only consist of the effects of the deeper structures such as, the Moho or the Lithosphere-Asthenosphere Boundary (LAB). The result of analogous computing process to isolate wavelengths above 300 km is presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(c) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(d). Following different tests using various low-pass filters and where the gravity field variations were considered, it appeared suitable to suppose that the gravity field of wavelength above 300 km originate from lower crust and to the LAB sources, whereas the gravity field for wavelength above 700 km is possibly only due to the LAB. In the case of the bandpass filtering of 300 &lt; λ &lt; 700 km (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>), the derived field is essentially or completely due to the lower crust-mantle interface (Moho).</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Modeling</title><p>To achieve a quantitative interpretation of the crust-mantle interface geometry of Cameroon, 16 profiles oriented west-east and 12 profiles oriented north-south were selected from the bandpass filtered map (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>) with a regular spacing of around 100 km. A 2.5D interpretation makes sense when profiles are perpendicular (or so) to the studied structures. In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, most of the structures are aligned roughly E-W, and therefore, horizontal profiles may seem not representative. However, they are critical for a better gridding of the Moho undulations.</p><p>Modelling of the whole lithosphere is difficult in the West and Central African Rift System (WCARS) due to the lack of constraining seismic data. For the present study, we take advantage of data from the newly Cameroon Broadband Seismic Experiment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref7">7</xref>] . Crust layer densities were estimated from the [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref24">24</xref>] P-wave velocity-density empirical relationship. Crust layer velocities used and estimated densities for the layers are provided in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>The density value used for the crust is the average density value for the deeper rocks. We adopted a density contrast of 400 kg/m<sup>3</sup> between the mantle and the crust. By using the cut-off wavelength of 300 &lt; 𝜆 &lt; 700 km the field due to near surface crustal sources are considered has been removed. The interpretation was performed by a two layer model, using GMSYS 2.5 D modeling programs. The results of the modelled twenty eight profiles are shown on <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Density values used for the gravity modeling. Densities of crustal units are obtained by using the relationship between P-wave velocity and density [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref24">24</xref>] </title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >p-wave velocity (m/s) Density (kg/m<sup>3</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2000 - 4500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2000 - 2490</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sediment cover</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5500 - 6000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2650 - 2710</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >basement</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6000 - 6800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2710 - 2860</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Middle crust</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6800 - 7100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2860 - 2960</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lower crust</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3300</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mantle</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results</title><p>As the purpose of this work is to represent the regional geometrical trend of the Moho, the crustal depths derived from the 28 profiles were mapped using Geosoft contouring program. This map (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>) is considered as reflecting the variations of the crust-mantle interface but not certainly its real depths. It can also be observed from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> the presence of high (red) and low (blue) Moho depths, and that the minimum and maximum amplitudes of these variations reach respectively 45 and 33 km, with the highest difference of about 12 km.</p><p>The present Moho depths are not automatically similar to the depths derived from seismic methods. These high and low depths are obtained with respect to the geoid, and do not absolutely correspond with zones of crustal thinning or thickening. Crustal thinning or thickening is determined when the Moho depths are obtained with respect to the topography.</p><p>The Moho topography (crustal thickness) was examined across Cameroon with respect to major tectonic terrains, as defined by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref5">5</xref>] and results were compared with previous crustal thickness estimates for similar terrains. Four domains can be clearly identified:</p><p>1) The Cameroon Volcanic Line domain (CVLd) is characterized by one elongated low ridge to its southern part in the oceanic sector. To the northern</p><p>part, there are two low ridges (M<sub>1</sub>, M<sub>2</sub>) probably corresponding to the roots of the Adamawa Plateau and the Mont Cameroon uplifts areas. In this domain, the Moho depth varies from 32 to 43 km with the minimum depth towards the coast. These estimates of crustal thickness are almost similar to those found by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref10">10</xref>] in the same terrains.</p><p>2) The Central African Shear Zone domain (CASZd) is likely shows a single and well defined large high ridge (M4) slightly oriented ENE-WSW. Here the Moho depths obtained varies from 36 to 40 km. There is no significant discrepancy with the average values reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>3) The Congo craton domain (CCd) does not seem to represent a unique ridge. Moho depth over this craton is minimum (36 km) on its center, in the Congo basin and maximum (45 km) away from the center with a rapid thinning northward in the border with the Oubanguides fold belt. Our depths seem in accordance with [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref4">4</xref>] (40 km) but there is a significant discrepancy with the average values reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref5">5</xref>] (50 km).</p><p>4) Chad basin domain (CBd) represents a large surface alternating highs and lows. The Moho depths are minimum on top of the Benue and the Garoua rifts and in the northern Biu Plateau. The mean depth is of about 33 km in this area. The Garoua rift shows an elongated high ridge slightly oriented east-west that abut the Adamawa plateau to the south and the Kapsiki plateau to the north.</p><p>In summary, our estimates of the Moho depths are in a relatively good agreement with previous estimates in the same terrains. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> show the comparison between Moho depths estimates from this study with previous seismic estimates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref26">26</xref>] . It can be seen that the mean absolute difference is around 6 km between the gravity and the seismic estimates. Compared with the maximum depth of 48 km, this difference may be considered as minor, even though the gap of 6 km may seem significant in some places. This discrepancy may be related to different factors: 1) our result assumes a constant density contrast throughout the area. The area being formed by suturing of different tectonic blocks, it cannot be excluded that lateral variations of density contrast are present and could have affected our Moho depths; 2) seismic studies (e.g. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref25">25</xref>] indicate that in some places there are two depths at which the shear wave increases, especially in St09 and St01 SW of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a), where the velocity increases to &gt;4.3 km∙s<sup>−1</sup>, at 25.5 km and at 40.5 km, suggesting the presence of the Moho at shallower surface in this area. These considerations could not be solved in our simplified gravity model.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison of Moho depths estimates from this study with estimates from seismic studies from selected stations shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Stations</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Modeled Moho depths from gravity (km)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Observed depths from seismic data (km)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Absolute Difference (km)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >St01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >St02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >St03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >St04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >St05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >St06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >St07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >St08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >St09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >St10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >St11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >St12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >St13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >St14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >St15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >St16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >St17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >St18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >St19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >St20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >St21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >St22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >St23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >St24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >St25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >St26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >St27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >St28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >St29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >St30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >St31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >St32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Discussion on the Origin and Age of the Moho Undulations</title><p>Considering the non-uniqueness of the solutions resulting from the gravity data interpretation, it is essential to discuss whether the calculated long wavelengths gravity highs and lows originate from variations in crustal thicknesses and not by differences in the mantle density or to deep intracrustal bodies.</p><p>In Cameroon and Central Africa, mantle velocities variations are well known [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref27">27</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref33">33</xref>] . However, the amplitudes of these variations (which are related to density variations), a few tens of kilometer are much smaller than those of the Moho undulations presented on the present study (a few hundreds of kilometer). This result is in agreement with previous results [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref35">35</xref>] who ensure that the range wavelengths of the crust-mantle interfaces usually of a few hundred kilometers, even though shorter wavelengths may exist in rifts or continental margins [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref36">36</xref>] . Additionally, seismic refraction studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref31">31</xref>] suggest that most of the crust in Cameroon is devoid of low-velocity layer. Therefore, our gravity analysis could not be affected by a mid-crustal low-density body. Further, when seismic data are accessible, the correlation is usually remarkable between gravity and seismic Moho undulations. For example, comparison between the gravity ridges M<sub>1</sub> and the Garoua rift delineated beneath the CVL and the Moho depth resulting from the seismic studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref5">5</xref>] exhibit the similar nature of undulations although the gravity Moho is 6 km deeper than the seismic Moho (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). However, as stated above, this discrepancy does not exceed the mean absolute difference between the gravity and the seismic Moho. Two distinct approaches can be applied to assess the age and the origin of the Moho undulations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref37">37</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref38">38</xref>] . Firstly, the undulations of the Moho are compared with the topography to examine if these Moho trends are associated with an extensional or with a compressional episode. In secondly, the Moho undulations are examined, in planview, to check if they are related to dated geological structures.</p><sec id="s5_1"><title>5.1. Comparison between the Topography and the Moho Undulations</title><p>The objective of this part is to examine if the Moho undulations stem from an extensional or a compressional phase.</p><p>When the topography and the Moho undulations are compared, various types of correlation can be identified. For different chosen sections (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>), the correlation between the topography and the Moho undulations is displayed. It is worth to mention that this correlation is not determined by the location of the section, as changing the location of any section in a particular domain will lead to a similar result.</p><p>1) The deeper Moho depths overlay the topographic highs</p><p>This is recognized in the Cameroon Volcanic line domain; (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(a) and the northern end of section C) although the Moho depths and the topography are not imaged at the same range, there are marking variations of the crustal thickness in this domain.</p><p>According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref37">37</xref>] , section A reminds structures achieved by compressional regime on an experimental crustal modeling process. We may therefore assume that the Moho undulations observed in the CVL domain (CVLd) evolved during an compressional episode.</p><p>2) The deepest Moho depths overlay the topographic lows. This is recognized in the Chad basin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(b)). This section shows an obvious change in the crustal thickness. This type of undulation is certainly associated with an extensional process [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref37">37</xref>] . It can thus be assumed that the Moho undulations observed in the Chad basin domain can be linked with an extensional episode. This observation is in good agreement with [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref39">39</xref>] who previously mapped extensional phase in the Chad basin.</p><p>3) in the case of the particular undulations depicted in the Central African Shear Zone domain (CASZd) and the Congo Basin (CB) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>(c)), there is no clear correspondence between the surface topography and the Moho undulations wherever the position of the section. These structures are therefore neither linked with an extensional nor with a compressional event. An alternative solution, in the case of the CASZd, is that this feature could be linked from a deep-seated fault.</p></sec><sec id="s5_2"><title>5.2. Correlation between the Surface Geology and the Moho Undulations</title><p>The objective of this analysis is to date the Moho undulations base on given geological criteria <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> compiles various relations that are observed between the recognized subsurface geological structures and the Moho undulations. From this comparison the following conclusions can be drawn:</p><p>The geological structures that overlap with the Moho undulations of the continental part of the Cameroon Volcanic Line domain (M<sub>1</sub> and M<sub>2</sub>) are in most cases linked with uplifts or basins of Tertiary age. We may suggest from these observations that there must have been a link between the Moho undulations</p><p>recognized in this area. This conclusion is fully compatible with [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref40">40</xref>] who argued that these regions uplifted and affected the crust, probably in the early Cenozoic shortly before the beginning of the CVL magmatism.</p><p>The geological structures that overlap with the Moho undulations in the Chad basin are usually linked with rift basins of Early Cretaceous age events [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref39">39</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref41">41</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref42">42</xref>] . They are usually filled with Cretaceous sediments when they are combined</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Relationships between surface or subsurface geological structures and the evidenced Moho undulations. See <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> for Moho structures definition</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Domain</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >General setting</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Moho structure</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Surface/subsurface correlation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >References</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cameroun volcanic line</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Two low ridges parallel with the Tertiary uplifts axis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CVLd (M<sub>1</sub>, M<sub>2</sub>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >the Adamawa and Month Cameroon Tertiary uplifts</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref40">40</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >The Central African Shear Zone</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >single high ridge slightly parallel with the Oubanguides orogeny</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CASZd (M<sub>4</sub>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cretaceous remnant east-west dextral shear zone.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref4">4</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >The Congo craton domain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Concentric with the Congo basin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CCd (M<sub>3</sub>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Post Precambrian rifting subsidence and thermal relaxation.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref44">44</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chad Basin domain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >undefined</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CBd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Early Cretaceous age events</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref39">39</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref41">41</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref42">42</xref>]</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>with low topographic. These observations may suggest that the development of the Moho undulations recognized is contemporaneous with the opening of the south and central Atlantic beginning around 130 Ma when wrench fault zones generated strike-slip movements that expanded into extensional sedimentary basins in Niger, Kenya and Sudan.</p><p>The axis of the Central African Shear Zone (CASZ) appears to at some extent follow the Moho undulations on this area. There is no clear geological or geophysical evidence if there is a link between Moho undulations and the orogenic events that formed this shear zone. However, this structure is likely to indicate a remaining part of an east-west dextral and shear zone of Cretaceous age. The zone has regenerated several times, and was associated with dextral movements, in connection with the opening of the South Atlantic in the Cretaceous period [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref43">43</xref>] . We speculate that this feature may have been related at Moho level with a confine upwelling of the mantle, as seismic studies suggest that the crust beneath the Central African Shear Zone shows a remarkable low velocity anomaly [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref27">27</xref>] .</p><p>The geological structures that overlap with the near circular shape Moho undulations of the Congo basin (CB) might suggest that the Moho undulations mapped in this area must have been formed almost at the same time as the basin. This basin is an intracratonic basin, with complex formation mechanism. However, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref44">44</xref>] suggest that development of the Congo Basin is linked with Precambrian rifting and subsided by post-rift thermal relaxation. From these observations we may speculate that the buildup of the related Moho undulations most be linked with the basin post rift subsidence, possibly in the Mesozoic-Cenozoic times, as [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref45">45</xref>] argued that the actual morphology of this basin was acquired at that times.</p><p>Although we have been using modern gravity data, all the geologic evidences show that the Moho undulations we depicted here might be dating back to the Early Cretaceous or to the Tertiary. There is no clear arrangement in the distribution of the real stress directions, and there is no reason to believe that the Moho undulations are still developing in Cameroon. However, recent seismic reflection interpretation indicates the presence of a Late Precambrian rift zone under the sedimentary section in the Congo basin as a consequence, the continuous subsidence of the basin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82140-ref30">30</xref>] . This subsidence must have an influence on the Moho geometry in this area, even though the significance of this influence is yet to be determined.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusions</title><p>The present work aims at constructing a model of the Moho undulations in Cameroon and adjacent areas. The Moho is an oscillating boundary of a strong density contrast, which is interpreted as the transition between the lower crust and mantle. The density contrast across the boundary and the depth of the boundary are obtained during the modeling of a set of 2.5 D profiles using the constraints of existing seismic sounding profiles</p><p>The following preliminary output can be deduced from the present study.</p><p>1) The methodology used to estimate undulations of the Moho provides suitable results that are slightly similar with those of the seismic data in most places, and with this technique, it has been possible to estimate the full map of the Moho undulation all over Cameroon and adjacent areas. However, as in this study we focused to better trace in plan view the continuity and the magnitudes of the Moho undulations, the amplitude differences between the gravity and the seismic Moho should not result to wrong interpretations.</p><p>2) In many places, the amplitude of the Moho undulations do not seem to be strongly correlated to the surface topography, therefore, the crust may not be in isostatic equilibrium in Cameroon.</p><p>3) A Correlation with the surface geology indicates that the Moho undulations in Cameroon can be related to the build-up of the West and Central African rift system dating back to the Early Cretaceous to Palaeogene, where the presence of intraplate tensional stresses reactivated previous shear zones of lithospheric weakness during the break up of Gondwana.</p><p>However, our result assumes a constant density contrast throughout the area. The area being formed by association of distinct tectonic units, the presence of lateral variations of density contrast cannot be excluded. A Moho deepening could thus be replaced by a shallower Moho, capped by a low-density lower crust. Analogously, a high density lower crust would appear as a Moho high. At the present level of knowledge it is hard to introduce further details on the density structure of the crust, as sufficient further information is not available. It is therefore vital that additional new knowledge like seismic reflection profiles, stress map and other measurements in the West and Central African rift System should be added to the model to better constrain the proposed conclusions.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We are very grateful to the authorities of the Bureau Gravimetrique International (BGI) for making available the gravity grids. Alain Pierre Tokam helped with the calculation density constrains.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Eyike, A., Enyegue A. Nyam, F. and Basseka, C.A. (2018) Topography of the Moho Undulation in Cameroon from Gravity Data: Preliminary Insights into the Origin, the Age and the Structure of the Crust and the Upper Mantle across Cameroon and Adjacent Areas. Open Journal of Geology, 8, 65-85. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2018.81005</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.82140-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shin, Y.H., Shum, C.K., Braitenberg, C., Lee, S.M., Na, S.H., Choi, K.S. and Lim, M. (2015) Moho Topography, Ranges and Folds of Tibet by Analysis of Global Gravity Models and GOCE Data. Scientific Reports, 5, Article No. 11681.  
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11681</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Paoletti, V., Hansen, P.C., Hansen, M.F. and Fedi, M. (2014) A Computationally Efficient Tool for Assessing the Depth Resolution in Large-Scale Potential-Field Inversion. Geophysics, 79, A33-A38. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2014-0017.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Steffen, R., Steffen, H. and Jentzsch, G. (2011) A Three-Dimensional Moho Depth Model for the Tien Shan from EGM2008 Gravity Data. Tectonics, 30, TC5091.  
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011TC002886</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Poudjom Djomani, Y.H., Nnange, J.M., Diament, M., Ebinger, C.J. and Fairhead, J.D. (1995) Effective Elastic Thickness and Crustal Thickness Variations in West-Central Africa Inferred from Gravity Data. Journal of Geophysical Research, 100, 22047-22070. https://doi.org/10.1029/95JB01149</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tokam, A.P.K., Tabod, C.T., Nyblade, A.A., Julià, J., Wiens, D.A. and Pasyanos, M.E. (2010) Structure of the Crust Beneath Cameroon, West Africa, from the Joint Inversion of Rayleigh Wave Group Velocities and Receiver Functions. Geophysical Journal International, 183, 1061-1076.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04776.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Reusch, A.M., Nyblade, A.A., Wiens, D.A., Shore, P.J., Ateba, B., Tabod, C.T. and Nnange, J.M. (2010) Upper Mantle Structure beneath Cameroon from Body Wave Tomography and the Origin of the Cameroon Volcanic Line. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 11, Q10W07. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GC003200</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guidarelli, M. and Aoudia, A. (2016) Ambient Noise Tomography of the Cameroon Volcanic Line and Northern Congo Craton: New Constraints on the Structure of the Lithosphere. Geophysical Journal International, 204, 1756-1765.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggv561</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nédélec, A. and NSIFA, E. (1987) Le complexe du Ntem (Sud-Cameroun): Une série tonalito-trondhémitique archéenne typique. Colloquium on African Geology, Berlin, 18-22 August 1987, Vol. 14, 3-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boukeke, D.B. (1994) Structures crustales d’Afrique Centrale déduites des anomalies gravimétriques et magnétiques: Le domaine précambrien de la République Centrafricaine et du Sud Cameroun. Doctoral Dissertation.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Globig, J., Fernàndez, M., Torne, M., Vergés, J., Robert, A. and Faccenna, C. (2016) New Insights into the Crust and Lithospheric Mantle Structure of Africa from Elevation, Geoid, and Thermal Analysis. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 121, 5389-5424. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB012972</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Njome, M.S. and de Wit, M.J. (2014) The Cameroon Line: Analysis of an Intraplate Magmatic Province Transecting Both Oceanic and Continental Lithospheres: Constraints, Controversies and Models. Earth-Science Reviews, 139, 168-194.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.09.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moreau, C., Regnoult, J.M., Déruelle, B. and Robineau, B. (1987) A New Tectonic Model for the Cameroon Line, Central Africa. Tectonophysics, 141, 317-334.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(87)90206-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ateba, B., Dorbath, C., Dorbath, L., Ntepe, N., Frogneux, M., Aka, F.T., Manguelle, D., et al. (2009) Eruptive and Earthquake Activities Related to the 2000 Eruption of Mount Cameroon Volcano (West Africa). Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 179, 206-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2008.11.021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Déruelle, B., Ngounouno, I. and Demaiffe, D. (2007) The “Cameroon Hot Line” (CHL): A Unique Example of Active Alkaline Intraplate Structure in Both Oceanic and Continental Lithospheres. Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 339, 589-600.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2007.07.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ambeh, W.B. and Fairhead, J.D. (1991) Regular, Deep Seismicity beneath Mt Cameroon Volcano: Lack of Evidence for Tidal Triggering. Geophysical Journal International, 106, 287-291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1991.tb04618.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Poudjom Djomani, Y.H., Diament, M. and Wilson, M. (1997) Lithospheric Structure across the Adamawa Plateau (Cameroon) from Gravity Studies. Tectonophysics, 273, 317-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(96)00280-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nono, A., Déruelle, B., Demaiffe, D. and Kambou, R. (1994) Tchabal Nganha Volcano in Adamawa (Cameroon): Petrology of a Continental Alkaline Lava Series. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 60, 147-178.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0273(94)90066-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Bonvalot, S., Balmino, G., Briais, A., Kuhn, M., Peyrefitte, A. and Vales, N. (2012) World Gravity Map. Bureau Gravimetrique International (BGI), Map, CGMW- BGI-CNES-IRD Ed., Paris.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Balmino, G., Vales, N., Bonvalot, S. and Briais, A. (2012) Spherical Harmonic Modeling to Ultra-High Degree of Bouguer and Isostatic Anomalies. Journal of Geodesy, 86, 499-520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-011-0533-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rapolla, A., Cella, F. and Dorre, A.S. (1995) Gravity Study of the Crustal Structures of Somalia along International Lithosphere Program Geotransects. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 20, 263-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/0899-5362(95)00053-V</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lavin, P.M. and Devane, J.F. (1970) Direct Design of Two-Dimensional Digital Wavenumber Filters. Geophysics, 35, 1073-1078. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1440143</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Syberg, F.J.R. (1972) A Fourier Method for the Regional-Residual Problem of Potential Fields. Geophysical Prospecting, 20, 47-75.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1972.tb00619.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zurflueh, E.G. (1967) Applications of Two-Dimensional Linear Wavelength Filtering. Geophysics, 32, 1015-1035. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1439905</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Christensen, N.I. and Mooney, W.D. (1995) Seismic Velocity Structure and Composition of the Continental Crust: A Global View. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 100, 9761-9788. https://doi.org/10.1029/95JB00259</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tabod, C.T., Fairhead, J.D., Stuart, G.W., Ateba, B. and Ntepe, N. (1992) Seismicity of the Cameroon Volcanic Line, 1982-1990. Tectonophysics, 212, 303-320.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(92)90297-J</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stuart, G.W., Fairhead, J.D., Dorbath, L. and Dorbath, C. (1985) A Seismic Refraction Study of the Crustal Structure Associated with the Adamawa Plateau and Garoua Rift, Cameroon, West Africa. Geophysical Journal International, 81, 1-12.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1985.tb01346.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adams, A.N., Wiens, D.A., Nyblade, A.A., Euler, G.G., Shore, P.J. and Tibi, R. (2015) Lithospheric Instability and the Source of the Cameroon Volcanic Line: Evidence from Rayleigh Wave Phase Velocity Tomography. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 120, 1708-1727. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JB011580</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Plomerova, J., Babuska, V., Dorbath, C., Dorbath, L. and Lillie, R.J. (1993) Deep Lithospheric Structure across the Central African Shear Zone in Cameroon. Geophysical Journal International, 115, 381-390.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1993.tb01193.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Begg, G.C., Griffin, W.L., Natapov, L.M., O’Reilly, S.Y., Grand, S.P., O’Neill, C.J. and Bowden, P. (2009) The Lithospheric Architecture of Africa: Seismic Tomography, Mantle Petrology, and Tectonic Evolution. Geosphere, 5, 23-50.  
https://doi.org/10.1130/GES00179.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Crosby, A.G., Fishwick, S. and White, N. (2010) Structure and Evolution of the Intracratonic Congo Basin. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 11, Q06010.  
https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GC003014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Meyers, J.B., Rosendahl, B.R., Harrison, C.G. and Ding, Z.D. (1998) Deep-Imaging Seismic and Gravity Results from the Offshore Cameroon Volcanic Line, and Speculation of African Hotlines. Tectonophysics, 284, 31-63.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(97)00173-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pasyanos, M.E. and Nyblade, A.A. (2007) A Top to Bottom Lithospheric Study of Africa and Arabia. Tectonophysics, 444, 27-44.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2007.07.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ojo, A.O., Ni, S. and Li, Z. (2017) Crustal Radial Anisotropy beneath Cameroon from Ambient Noise Tomography. Tectonophysics, 696, 37-51.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2016.12.018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Dorre, A.S. and Rapollia, A. (1993) Regional Gravity Study of Somalia. In: Abate, E., Sagri, M. and Sassi, F.P., Eds., Geology and Mineral Resources of Somalia and the Surrounding Regions, Relazioni Monografia 113, istituto Agronomico per L’Oltremare, Firenze, 397-416.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hosney, H. (1994) Scientific Report about Gravity Data Processing and Interpretation of the Arab Republic of Egypt. Unpublished Report, Universita di Napoli, Napoli, 12 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eyike, A. and Ebbing, J. (2015) Lithospheric Structure of the West and Central African Rift System from Regional Three-Dimensional Gravity Modelling. South African Journal of Geology, 118, 285-298. https://doi.org/10.2113/gssajg.118.3.285</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martinod, J. and Davy, Ph. (1992) Periodic Instabilities during Compression or Extension of the Lithosphere: I. Deformation Mode from an Analytical Perturbation Method. Journal of Geophysical Research, 97, 1999-2014.  
https://doi.org/10.1029/91JB02715</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lefort, J.P. and Agarwal, B.N.P. (2002) Topography of the Moho Undulations in France from Gravity Data: Their Age and Origin. Tectonophysics, 350, 193-213.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(02)00114-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cratchley, C.R., Louis, P. and Ajakaiye, D.E. (1984) Geophysical and Geological Evidence for the Benue-Chad Basin Cretaceous Rift Valley System and Its Tectonic Implications: Journal of African Earth Sciences, 2, 141-150.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-7247(84)80008-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Browne, S.E. and Fairhead, J.D. (1983) Gravity Study of the Central African Rift System: A Model of Continental Disruption 1. The Ngaoundere and Abu Gabra Rifts. Tectonophysics, 94, 187-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(83)90016-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Burke, K. (1976) The Chad Basin: An Active Intra-Continental Basin. Tectonophysics, 36, 197-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(76)90016-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Genik, G.J. (1992) Regional Framework, Structural and Petroleum Aspects of Rift Basins in Niger, Chad and the Central African Republic (CAR). Tectonophysics, 213, 169-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(92)90257-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dorbath, C., Dorbath, L., Fairhead, J.D. and Stuart, G.W. (1986) A Teleseismic Delay Time Study across the Central African Shear Zone in the Adamawa Region of Cameroon, West Africa. Geophysical Journal International, 86, 751-766.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1986.tb00658.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Buiter, S.J., Steinberger, B., Medvedev, S. and Tetreault, J.L. (2012) Could the Mantle Have Caused Subsidence of the Congo Basin? Tectonophysics, 514, 62-80.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2011.09.024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82140-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kadima, E., Delvaux, D., Sebagenzi, S.N., Tack, L. and Kabeya, S.M. (2011) Structure and Geological History of the Congo Basin: An Integrated Interpretation of Gravity, Magnetic and Reflection Seismic Data. Basin Research, 23, 499-527.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2117.2011.00500.x</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>