<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJMH</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Modern Hydrology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2163-0461</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojmh.2018.81003</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJMH-81863</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Egg Development Time (EDT) in &lt;i&gt;Mesocyclops ogunnus&lt;/i&gt;
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Moshe</surname><given-names>Gophen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Migal-Scientific Research Institute, Kiryat Shmone, Israel</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>gophen@migal.org.il</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>22</day><month>12</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>28</fpage><lpage>37</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>19,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>16,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2018</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>19,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2018</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  A study was carried out on the impacts of temperature and light/dark regime on the Egg Development Time (EDT) of the cyclopoid
  a
   copepod, Mesocyclops ogunnus in Lake Kinneret. It was found that EDT was 148, 33 and 20 hours under 15&#176;C, 22&#176;C, and 27&#176;C respectively. EDT was different between the two regimes of 12/12 hrs light/dark and 24 hrs light. Egg hatching and survival were higher under 24 hrs light regime. The results of temperature and light regime impacts on EDT indicate ecological implication on cyclopoid
  a
   copepod population dynamics in lakes. The implication of the results to the global warming trend is also suggested.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Development</kwd><kwd> Eggs</kwd><kwd> Kinneret</kwd><kwd> Mesocyclops</kwd><kwd> Time</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The impact of temperature on the life cycle stages of Mesoocyclops oggunus (Sin. M. ogunnus) in Lake Kinneret was widely documented in previous studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref1">1</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref6">6</xref>] . Nevertheless, the experimental procedure for the measurement of the Egg Development Time (EDT) was not published. The present paper is focused on the experimental implementation aimed at the study of the temperature and light/dark regime impact on EDT. To improve results’ reliability, a combination of two methods was implemented: common arithmetic averages (with SD) (Standard Deviation) and timing interval sorted graphic plot of the data.</p><p>It is widely known that the biological parameter of EDT is significantly affected by temperature and essential for understanding a cyclopoida-copepod like M. ogunnus life cycle as well as interaction with other compartments of the ecosystem [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref11">11</xref>] . The EDT parameter also affects the predation of the copepod because ovigerous females carrying eggs are more susceptible to predators than females without eggs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref12">12</xref>] . The impact of light conditions on EDT was also previously documented [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref14">14</xref>] . Among environmental conditions, temperature and light impact on EDT is among the top priorities in research topics of marine [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref15">15</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref20">20</xref>] and freshwater [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref25">25</xref>] copepods. Increase of EDT with temperature decline in freshwater copepods and cladoceran species was documented [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref22">22</xref>] . Landry [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref18">18</xref>] studied how the EDT of Acartia clause females is affected by the thermal exposure history (time length and temperature level) before eggs were laid. Corcket [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref15">15</xref>] documented that, in addition to temperature, egg size also influences the EDT span. The objective of the present paper is documentation of reliable results of EDT of M. ogunnus as part of the eco-physiological research of this copepod in the Kinneret ecosystem. The M. ogunnus is the dominant species among cyclopoida copepods in Lake Kinneret which comprises 35% of the zooplankton biomass assemblages in the lake. The study is part of eco-physiological research of the zooplankton communities in Lake Kinneret and was never reported earlier.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Selection of Experimental Temperature</title><p>Three temperatures were selected: 15˚C which exists throughout the entire water column when the lake is totally mixed (December-April); 22˚C which mostly existed in the epilimnion of the lake during April-May and November-December; and 27˚C which is common in the epilimnion during the summer months (June-October). When the lake is stratified (December-May), the Hypolimnion is anoxic.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Experimental Procedure</title><p>Zooplankton was collected in the lake by 200 &#181;m net mesh size. The dense material was removed into a conical shape glass funnel equipped with a bottom tap for 4.5 hours at room temperature (25˚C). Dead animals were removed through the bottom tap every 30 - 45 minutes. Due to the high tolerance of adult cyclopoida copepods to DO concentration, after 4.5 hours, the living organisms in the funnel were 90% - 95% adult copepods. The organisms were divided arbitrarily into three aliquots which were individually placed inside incubators (12/12 hours light/dark conditions) in three temperatures (15˚C, 22˚C, 27˚C) adjusted in Petri dishes. The material was immediately observed under anesthesia by CO<sub>2</sub> (Soda) and fecund (dark colored ovaries), or ovigerous females were isolated individually into small Petri dishes containing 15 ml filtered (45 &#181;m Millipore filter paper) lake water and observational timing record started immediately. The dishes were observed every two hours, and lay of eggs, the subsequent hatching and the number of newborn nauplii were recorded. In case egg-laying recorded observation was missed, the time interval recorded as half of the pause was considered. No food was submitted to the females. All females recorded exposed to the experimental temperature throughout the entire observation time started with no eggs but were close to starting the laying process or newly hatched. The sign of females’ readiness for laying was dark (heavy brown) colored ovaries. The results of the total number of eggs laid and percentages of hatched and dead eggs are presented in Tables 1(a)-(c) and Figures 1(a)-(c). The incubation time at temperatures of 22˚C and 27˚C required longer night observations, and the timing accounted was half of the break. The Number of females and consequently of eggs was not similar in three experiment trials is due to different survived animals preconditioned.</p><table-wrap-group id="1"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Experimental results under (a) 15˚C, (b) (22˚C), and (c) (27˚C). Number of eggs, hatching number and % and EDT per female of: total number of laid eggs, incubation time (hrs), number and % of hatched eggs, number of dead eggs. Total number of females and mean EDT (hrs) are given</title></caption><table-wrap id="1_1"><caption><title> (b)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Egg/female</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Hatched (% of hatched)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Incubation time (hrs)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Dead Eggs</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51 (94)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >129</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (93)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >142</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70 (90)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >144</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 (93)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >148</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54 (86)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >153</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27 (79)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >163</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (63)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total: 289 (7 females)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >252 (87)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean Incubation Time (hr) (SD)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >148 (15)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="1_2"><caption><title> (c)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Egg/female</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Hatched (% of hatched)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Incubation time (hrs)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Dead Eggs</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 (81)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (90)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (74)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (60)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (86)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36 (90)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (83))</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (88)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (33)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total: 177 (11 females)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >146 (82)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean Incubation Time (hr) (SD)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33 (11)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="1_3"><caption><title></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Egg/female</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Hatched (% of hatched)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Incubation time (hrs)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Dead Eggs</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (60)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (89)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42 (67)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 (71)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 (75)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27 (96)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (29)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total: 178 (7 females)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >127 (71)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean Incubation Time (hr) (SD)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 (5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><p>The second trial was similar to the first one with an additional design of light condition: 24 hours light comparatively with 12/12 hr light/dark condition under 15˚C.</p><p>7, 11, and 7 females were observed under 15˚C, 22˚C, and 27˚C, respectively. Observations were carried out every 2 hours.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>Results of incubation times (EDT) under the 3 experimental temperatures are shown in Tables 1(a)-(c). In each table the total number of eggs laid per female, number of hatched eggs and dead eggs are presented, and their percentage portion indicated. The documentation of the observed data Vs (Versus) interval timing sorted is presented in Figures 1(a)-(c). The three measured EDTs’ (hrs) were 148, 33 and 20 under (15˚C), 2 (22˚C), and 3 (27˚C) respectively.</p><p>Results in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> indicate clearly the higher percentage of hatching and lower percentage of egg mortality under a 24 hours light regime with no significant difference in EDT between the two regimes.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Results presented in Tables 1(a)-(c) indicate an EDT of 148, 33, and 20 hours in 15, 22, and 27, respectively. Those values were confirmed by Figures 1(a)-(c) evaluated through the graphic plot [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref26">26</xref>] . This graphic procedure include X axis-time (hrs) sorted of hatched and dead number of eggs (Y axis) followed by drawn line through the most active changes and parallel line started from first hatch. The touching point of the parallel draw line on the X axis is the mean EDT in hrs (see figures). Individual females which were experimentally cultivated from</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Total number of eggs laid, % hatched, % of dead eggs and incubation time (EDT) (hrs) under 12/12 light/dark and 24 hours light conditions at 15˚C</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Light Regime:</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total Number of laid Eggs</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >% of hatched eggs</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >% of Dead eggs</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Incubation time (hrs) (EDT) (SD)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12/12 hr Light/Dark</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >180</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >131 (23)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 hr Light</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >202</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >124 (26)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>egg-through nauplius-copepodite-adulthood stages, the percentage of hatching under 15˚C and 22˚C was 30% and 67%, respectively, whilst in females freshly collected it was 87% and 82%, respectively. It is likely that longer exposure to natural lake conditions (food and temperatures) improved body conditions resulting in higher % of hatching. On the other hand, females’ fecundity under 27˚C cultivated experimentally during the entire life cycle of the EDT was higher than that of the females described here. It can be interpreted as a negative impact of high temperature which damaged the eggs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref21">21</xref>] . The EDT values under temperatures of 15˚C and 22˚C indicate a longer period than 24 hours. Consequently, the light/dark conditions as comparative evaluation between experimental and the natural ecosystem is legitimate. Under 27˚C, probably induction time of the dark period in summer is shorter than in winter, fall and spring periods when temperatures are lower. It is assumed that a continuation of light regime induces improvement on processes of egg development, causing less mortality and a higher % of hatching.</p><p>Results in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> indicate a shorter incubation time by 10% under continuous darkness. It is, therefore, assumed that darkness induces a shorter EDT and thereby a higher hatching rate with possibly greater clutches at night. Moreover, darkness improvement as shorter EDT might reduce vulnerability to potential predators. It is also likely that hatching enhancement in darkness reduces visual (invertebrates and particulate feeders fishes) and filter feeder fishes accompanied by a higher survival of newborn nauplii. It was documented (Gophen 1978a) that the densities of ovigerous females (carrying eggs) is lowest at dawn. The experimental design of EDT measurement of individual observation on a fertilized female is, therefore, suggested to be appropriate and relevant. The disadvantage of this method is the limited number of observed specimens, and the advantage is the direct observation of the living individual, ensuring fecundity, egg production, laying and hatching. Nevertheless, the objective of the observations is the study of thermal effect on the EDT as one significant parameter among other metabolic rates.</p>Global Warming Implications<p>Enormous documentations confirmed quite an old statement: “All metabolic rates of zooplankton are dependent on temperature” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>The study of thermal influence on metabolic rates is practically the measurements of the change of those rates under temperature elevation or decline. These changes differ significantly between poikilothermic and homeothermic, large and small, and terrestrial and aquatic animals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref27">27</xref>] . Those differences are critical for the dynamics of the process of energy transfer from the environment into the organism body (heating) or “backwards” (cooling). In the case of such microscopical zooplankters as M. ogunnus, the rate of energy transfer is of immediate and direct effect. It is widely known that thermal equilibration time dynamic increases with body size or biomass [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref28">28</xref>] . M. ogunnus is a small aquatic poikilothermic organism which, therefore, maintains an immediate body temperature equilibration with environmental changes of the initial temperature. Exposure time to modified heat levels, food quality and dark/light conditions were found to have a significant impact on egg size, rate of development and biochemical composition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref29">29</xref>] . Global warming or climate change is presently at the top of the international agenda [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref30">30</xref>] . Global warming is accounted as the mother of most environmental scares and may be linked to many other sorts of calamities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref30">30</xref>] . Nevertheless, natural life evolution developed adaptive capacity in aquatic organisms like M. ogunnus in Lake Kinneret to adjust metabolic rates within the thermal amplitude ranges of 15˚C - 27˚C as presented in this paper or even slightly extended (12˚C - 30˚C). As predicted, in continuation of the global warming process, higher temperatures (&gt;33˚C, Thermocyclops sp.; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref21">21</xref>] ) might demolish the cyclopoid population in Lake Kinneret as a result of eggs partly damaged or entirely disintegrated and/or other stressed metabolic rates. It is not impossible that a continuation of the global warming trend in a large lake such as Kinneret might be damageable to the physiological traits of planktonic organisms. The global warming trend of the ecological condition is predicted to stress directly or indirectly freshwater ecosystems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref27">27</xref>] . Lake ecosystems might experience changes in diel, seasonal and annual thermal and hydrological patterns [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref31">31</xref>] as a result of long-term thermal elevation. Such a stressor within freshwater lake ecosystems will be followed by biological modifications of metabolic rates, or life cycle dynamics caused by inappropriate balances between the food web compartments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref31">31</xref>] . Results shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> indicate a shorter EDT and prominent increase of metabolic rates in relation to the thermal elevation, which confirms the prediction of energy flow enhancement within the food-web which can be ascribed to the impact of the global warming process.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusive Summary</title><p>Experimental study of the impact of temperature has indicated 148, 33 and 20 hours under 15˚C, 22˚C, and 27˚C, respectively. Experimental light/dark regime has indicated improvement of egg hatching and survival. Previous documentations of metabolic rates of M. ogunnus confirmed a complementary thermal impact: 58% increase of EDT under 22˚C in comparison with 15˚C and lower (33%) shortening at 27˚C as compared with 22˚C whilst efficiency of food consumption by. M. ogunnus declined (−47%) between 15˚C and 22˚C and elevated (+63%) between 22˚C and 27˚C (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). It is concluded that the thermal ele-</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Percentage changes of EDT duration and metabolic rates (mgC/mgC(body)/day); [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref6">6</xref>] in adult females of M. ogunnus: P = Production as egg production and body length increment; R = Respiration, Oxygen demand converted to Carbon; C = Food consumption; E = Efficiency as (P + R)/C in %. A = the % change between 15˚C and 22˚C; B = The % change between 22˚C and 27˚C</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >A</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >B</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >EDT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+115</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+55</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+74</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+361</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >E</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >+63</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>EDT = shorter; Metabolic Rates: + = Elevation; − =decline.</p><p>vation (global warming) might be reflected as an ecosystem productivity enhancement in cold periods (Winter) more than in summer time. Nevertheless, a smaller thermal increase in summer can enhance egg damage and reduction of zooplankton biomass increment. For future research on the potential influences of global warming on freshwater aquatic ecosystem, the experimental studies of EDT and metabolic rate changes under temperatures above 27˚C and below 15˚C are recommended. Data documented in closely related studies indicated results compatibility, among others, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81863-ref23">23</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Gophen, M. (2018) Egg Development Time (EDT) in Mesocyclops ogunnus. Open Journal of Modern Hydrology, 8, 28-37. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojmh.2018.81003</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.81863-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gophen, M. (1976) The Ecological Conditions That Influence the Reproduction and Development of Mesocyclops leuckarti (Claus) and Its Role in the Food Chain in Lake Kinneret. Ph.D. Thesis, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, 187 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81863-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gophen, M. (1978a) Errors in the Estimation of Recruitment of Early Stages of Mesocyclops leuckarti (Claus) Caused by the Diurnal Periodicity of Egg Production. Hydrobiologia, 57, 59-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018628</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81863-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gophen, M. (1978b) The Productivity of Mesocyclops leuckarti (Claus) in Lake Kinneret (Israel). Hydrobiologia, 60, 17-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018683</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81863-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Gophen, M. (1978c) Zooplankton. In: Serruya, C., Ed., Lake Kinneret, Monographiae Biologicae 32, Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague, 297-311.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9954-1_11</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81863-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gophen, M. (2015) Thermal Preference by Mesocyclops ogunnus (Onabamiro 1957). Open Journal of Ecology, 5, 15-21. https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2015.52002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81863-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gophen, M. and Azoulay, B. (2002) The Trophic Status of Zooplankton Communities in Lake Kinneret (Israel). Verhandlungen des Internationalen Verein Limnologie, 28, 836-839.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81863-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Heinle, D.R. (1969) Temperature and Zooplankton/Chesapeake Science. Proceedings of the 2nd Thermal Workshop of the US International Biological Program, 10, 186-209. http://www.jstor.orgf./stab/1350456</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81863-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McLaren A.D. (1966) Predicting Development Rate of Copepod Eggs. The Biological Bulletin, 131, 457-469. https://doi.org/10.2307/1539985</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81863-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Corket, C.J. and McLaren. A.I. (1970) Relationships between Development Rate of Eggs and Older Stages of Copepods. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 50, 161-168. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315400000680</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81863-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maier, G. (1989) The Effect of Temperature on the Development Times of Eggs, Naupliar, and Copepodite Stages of Five Species of Cyclopoid Copepods. Hydrobiologia, 184, 145-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00014304</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81863-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sullivan, L.J. and Kimmer, W.J. (2013) Egg Development Times of Eurythemora affinis, and Pseudodiaptomus forbesi, (Coprpoda, Calanoida) from the Upper San Francisco Estuary with Notes on Methods. Journal of Plankton Research, 35, 1331-1338.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81863-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vuorinen, I., Rajasilta, M. and Salo, J. (1983) Selective Predation and Habitat Shift in Copepod Species: Support for the Predation Hypothesis. Oecologia, 59, 62-64.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00388073</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81863-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Landry, M.R. (1975) Dark Inhibition of Egg Hatching of the Marine Copepod Acartia clausi Giesbr. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 20, 43-47.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(75)90100-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81863-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Uye, S. (1976) Effects of Various Environmental Factors on Egg Development of Several Species of Acartia in Southern California. Marine Biology, 38, 253-262.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00388938</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81863-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Corcket, C.J. (1972) Development Rate of Copepod Eggs of the genus Calanus. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 10, 171-175.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(72)90070-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81863-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Devreker, D., Souissi, S., Winkler, G., et al. (2009) Effect of Salinity, Temperature and Individual Variability on the Reproduction of Eurytemora affinis (Copepoda: Calanoida) from the Sein Estuary: A Laboratory Study. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 368, 113-123.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2008.10.015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81863-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guerrero, F., Blanco, J.M. and Rodriguez, V. (1994) Temperature-Dependent Development in Marine Copepod: A Comparative Analysis of Models. Journal of Plankton Research, 16, 95-103. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/16.1.95</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81863-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Landry, M.R. (1975) Seasonal Temperature Effect and Predicting Development Rates of Marine Copepod Eggs. Limnology and Oceanography, 20, 434-440.  
https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1975.20.3.0434</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81863-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McLaren, I.A., Corckett, C.J. and Zillious, E.J. (1969) Temperature Adaptations of Copepod Eggs from the Arctic to the Tropics. The Biological Bulletin, 137, 486-493.  
https://doi.org/10.2307/1540170</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81863-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tester, P.A. (1985) Effect of Parental Acclimation Temperature and Egg Incubation Temperature on Egg Hatching Time in Acartia tonsa (Copepoda, Calanoida). Marine Biology, 89, 45-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00392876</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81863-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Burgis, M.J. (1970) The Effect of Temperature on the Development Time of Eggs of Thermocyclops sp. a Tropical Cyclopoid Copepod from Lake Georg Uganda. Limnology and Oceanography, 15, 742-747. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1970.15.5.0742</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81863-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bottrell, H.H. (1975) The Relationship between Temperature and Duration of Egg Development in Some Epiphytic Cladocera and Copepoda from the River Thames, Reading, with a Discussion of Temperature Function. Oecologia, 18, 63-84.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00350636</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81863-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hart, R.C. and McLaren, I.J. (1978) Temperature Acclimation and Other Influences on Embryonic Duration in the Copepod Pseudocalanus sp. Marine Biology, 45, 23-30.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81863-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Herzig, A. (1983) The Ecological Significance of the Relationship between Temperature and Duration of Embryonic Development in Planktonic Freshwater Copepod. Hydrobiologia, 100, 65-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00027423</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81863-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Vijverberg</surname><given-names> J. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1980</year>)<article-title>Effect of Temperature in Laboratory Studies on Development and Growth of Cladocera and Coprpoda from Tjeukemeer, the Neytherlands</article-title><source> Freshwater Biology</source><volume> 10</volume>,<fpage> 317</fpage>-<lpage>340</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81863-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Taube, I. (1966) The Temperature Dependence of the Development of the Embrio in Mesocyclops leuckarti (Claus) and Cyclops scutifer Sars. MSc Thesis, English Translation by Talling, I.B., Limnological Institute, Uppsala, 35 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81863-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Sweeny, B.W., Jackson, J.K., Newbold, J.D. and Funk, D.H. (1992) Climate Change and the Life Histories and Biogeography of Aquatic Insects in Eastern North America. In: Firth, P. and Fisher, S.G., Eds., Global Climate Change and Freshwater Ecosystems, Springer-Verlag, New York, 143-176.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2814-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81863-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Peters, R.H. (1993) Chapter: Temperature and Metabolic Rate. In: Peters, R.H., Ed., The Ecological Implications of Body Size, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 54-78.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81863-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bonnet, D. and Carlotti, F. (2001) Development and Egg Production in Centropages typicus (Copepoda: Calanoida) Fed Different Food Types: A Laboratory Study. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 224, 133-148. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps224133</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81863-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Parsons, M.L. (1995) Global Warming the Truth behind the Myth. Chapter: Singer, S. F. Forward, Insight Books, Plenum Press, New York and London, 7-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81863-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schindler, D.W., et al. (1990) Effect of Climate Warming on Lakes of the Central Boreal Forest. Science, 250, 967-970. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.250.4983.967</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>