<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Agricultural Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2156-8553</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/as.2018.91002</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AS-81621</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Estrus Synchronization and Artificial Insemination with Fresh and Chilled Semen in Assaf Ewes
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Raquel</surname><given-names>Fornazari</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Óscar</surname><given-names>Mateus</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Teresa</surname><given-names>Correia</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hélder</surname><given-names>Quintas</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Raimundo</surname><given-names>Maurício</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Anderclei</surname><given-names>Conradi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lucas</surname><given-names>Francisco</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Armindo</surname><given-names>Álvaro</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ramiro</surname><given-names>Valentim</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Polytechnic Superior Institute of Kwanza Sul, Sumbe, Angola</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Federal Technology University of Paraná, Campus of Dois Vizinhos, Dois Vizinhos, Brasil</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Animal Science, Agrarian Superior School of Braganza, Braganza, Portugal</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Mountain Investigation Center, Polytechnic Institute of Braganza, Braganza, Portugal</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>08</day><month>01</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>8</fpage><lpage>22</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>29,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>6,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2018</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>9,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2018</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  This paper aims to study the efficiency of two short-term progestagen (FGA vs. MAP) + eCG treatments in estrus synchronization and artificial insemination (AI) with fresh or chilled semen in Assaf ewes fertility rate. All ewes received a subcutaneous implant of exogenous melatonin 45 days before been treated with short-term progestagens + eCG. By June 1
  <sup>st</sup>, ewes were divided in two groups: half was treated with an intravaginal sponge impregnated with 20 mg of FGA and the other half with an intravaginal sponge impregnated with 60 mg of MAP. Progestagen treatments lasted for 6 days. At sponge withdraw, all ewes were injected with 750 IU of eCG. Ovarian activity was assessed by plasmatic progesterone levels before and after progestagens + eCG treatment. Semen was collected by electro ejaculation and extended with Andromed
  <sup>&#174;</sup> or OviXcell
  <sup>&#174;</sup>. AI was performed 55 hours after eCG administration with fresh or chilled semen. During AI several factors were assessed: vagina mucosa color and lubrication, external cervical 
  Os type, cervical mucous viscosity, semen deposition place and seminal cervix outflow. Semen was deposited as deep as possible without distress or trauma cervix mucosa. All Assaf ewes presented cyclic activity before progestagen + eCG treatments (2
  <sup>nd</sup> fortnight of May). Short-term progestagen + eCG treatments were equally efficient (100.0%). About 76.5% of Assaf ewes were pregnant 41 days after AI. Fertility rate was influenced by external 
  Os type, semen deposition place and seminal cervix outflow. However, this rate was not conditioned by vaginal color or lubrication, cervical mucus viscosity, semen preservation technic and semen extender.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Sheep</kwd><kwd> Assaf</kwd><kwd> Estrus Synchronization</kwd><kwd> Artificial Insemination</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Reproduction control and AI hold several advantages to commercial flocks: they improve farm management [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref3">3</xref>] and production [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref4">4</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref9">9</xref>] , reproduction data recording accuracy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref7">7</xref>] , genetic progress and animals production value [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref10">10</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref19">19</xref>] and allow the use of temporary physic, physiology or behavior defective animals as breeders [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref14">14</xref>] , precocious detection of infertility or subfertility [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref20">20</xref>] , control sexual transmitted diseases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref21">21</xref>] and improve profitability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref22">22</xref>] . Nevertheless this technic is scarcely used in the Northeast of Portugal due to breeders’ age, poor education, size and scarce property ownership, tradition, among other factors.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><p>This study took place in Carvi&#231;ais, Torre de Moncorvo County (Portugal), at the Mateus Lda. commercial farm (Latitude: 41˚10'N, Longitude: 6˚55'W and Altitude: 701 meters) between April 1<sup>st</sup> and July 20<sup>th</sup>, 2017.</p><p>Ewes were permanently raised indoors, fed in group with natural meadow hay (ad libitum) and supplemented with 1.0 kg/ewe/day of Lucerne hay and 1.0 kg/ewe/day of a commercial food product. During the milking process, twice a day, ewes were individually supplemented with 0.5 kg of a commercial food product.</p><p>Ewes were weighted in a cage scale and the body score was classified according to the Australian Body Score Condition (BSC) table [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref23">23</xref>] .</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Animals</title><p>Thirty-four ewes (primiparous: 33 and multiparous: 1) and two adult (2 - 3 years old) Assaf rams were used in this study. Last lambing happened 3 - 4 months earlier. All ewes were milked twice a day.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Ovarian Activity</title><p>Ovarian activity was assessed by plasmatic progesterone levels. Blood samples were collected to vacuum tubes with heparin by jugular vein puncture. After blood centrifugation at 3,000 rpm, for 15 minutes, at room temperature, blood plasma was collected to previously identified Eppendorf tubes and briefly preserved in an ultra-freezer at −70˚C. RIA assessed Progesterone plasmatic levels using a DPC<sup>&#174;</sup> Gamma C12 scintillation counter and DiaSource<sup>&#174;</sup> kits (DiaSource ImmunoAssays S.A., Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium). Intra and inter assays mean coefficients were 7.7% and 15.8%, respectively.</p><sec id="s2_2_1"><title>2.2.1. Initial Assessment</title><p>At the second fortnight of May, blood samples were collected in the morning, every 3 - 4 days, to evaluate the initial physiology state of all ewes by progesterone blood plasmatic levels.</p><p>Ewes were considered in anestrous when, in all collected samples, progesterone plasmatic levels were below 0.5 ng/ml [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref24">24</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2_2"><title>2.2.2. Post-Progestagens + eCG Treatments Assessment</title><p>The formation of the first corpus luteum (CL) post hormonal treatments was assessed by blood samples collection for 5 days. First collection took place 24 hours post eCG administration.</p><p>Ewes were considered to have formed the first CL when progesterone plasmatic levels rose over 0.5 ng/ml for the first time [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref24">24</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Hormonal Treatments</title><p>All ewes received a melatonin (18 mg) subcutaneous implant (Melovine, CEVA, Portugal) on April 1<sup>st</sup>. On July 15<sup>th</sup> ewes were divided in two groups: FGA (n = 17) and MAP (n = 17) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). FGA ewes were treated with an intravaginal sponge impregnated with 20 mg of fluorgestone acetate (Chrono-Gest<sup>&#174;</sup>, Intervet, Portugal) and MAP ewes with an intravaginal sponge impregnated with 60 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate (Sincro-Gest<sup>&#174;</sup>, Laboratorios Ovejero, Spain). At the same time all ewes were injected i.m. with 100 &#181;g of cloprostenol (Estrumate<sup>&#174;</sup>, MSD Animal Health, Portugal), a Prostaglandin F<sub>2</sub><sub>α</sub>(PGF<sub>2</sub><sub>α</sub>) synthetic analogous.</p><p>Progestagens treatments lasted for 6 days. At sponge withdraw (June 7<sup>th</sup>) ewes were injected i.m. with 750 IU of eCG/ewe (Intergonan<sup>&#174;</sup>, Intervet, Portugal).</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Semen Collection and Seminal Analysis</title><p>Semen was collected by electro ejaculation (Electrojac<sup>TM</sup> Ideal, Minesota, USA). Eight ejaculates were collected: 2/ram in the morning and 2/ram in the afternoon. Rams did not ejaculate for 3 days before collection. Ejaculates were transported to lab and placed in a water-bath at 37˚C (Neslab<sup>&#174;</sup> RTE 221, Newington, USA). Semen extenders were also kept in the same equipment.</p><p>Each ejaculate was evaluated for volume, concentration and wave motility.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Assaf ewes divided by the ovarian control activity treatment</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Assaf Ewes (n = 34)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Melatonin Implant (18 mg)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 mg FGA + 100 &#181;g of Cloprostenol (n = 17)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60 mg MAP + 100 &#181;g of Cloprostenol (n = 17)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Intravaginal Sponge Removal + 750 IU eCG</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Only ejaculates with volume higher than 1.0 ml, good wave motility and a minimum concentration of 3.0 &#215; 10<sup>9</sup> spermatozoa/ml were used. Each seminal dose was prepared to contain at least 200 &#215; 10<sup>6</sup> spermatozoa.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Semen Doses</title><p>Morning collected ejaculates from the same male were well mixed before been divided into two tubes and extended (1:1) with Andromed<sup>&#174;</sup> (Minit&#252;b, Tiefenbach, Deutschland) or OviXcell<sup>&#174;</sup> (IMV Technologies, L’Aigle, France). Ten minutes later extended semen was cooled from 37˚C to 15˚C, for 120 minutes, in a refrigerator water-bath (Neslab<sup>&#174;</sup> RTE 221, Newington, USA). After been stabilized for 10 minutes, extended semen was packed in 0.25 ml French mini straws and sealed with polyvinyl chloride powder.</p><p>Afternoon collected ejaculates from the same male were well mixed before been divided into two tubes and extended (1:1) with Andromed<sup>&#174;</sup> (Minit&#252;b, Tiefenbach, Deutschland) or OviXcell<sup>&#174;</sup> (IMV Technologies, L’Aigle, France). After been stabilized for 10 minutes at 37˚C, extended semen was packed into 0.25 ml French mini straws and sealed with polyvinyl chloride powder. AI started less than 30 minutes later.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Time Fixed Artificial Insemination</title><p>AI started 55 hours after eCG administration. Ewes began to be inseminated with fresh extended semen. One skilled technician performed AI.</p><p>Near half ewes treated with FGA + eCG were inseminated with fresh diluted semen and the other half with chilled semen. The same was done in ewes treated with MAP + eCG. Within both groups some ewes were inseminated with semen extended with Andromed<sup>&#174;</sup> and the others with semen extended with OviXcell<sup>&#174;</sup> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>During AI the following factors were assessed: vagina mucosa color (Pale pink vs. Pink vs. Dark pink), vagina lubrication (Good vs. Poor), external cervical Os type (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>), cervical mucus viscosity (Liquid vs. Viscose), semen deposition place (Vaginal vs. 1<sup>st</sup> fold vs. 2<sup>nd</sup> fold) and seminal cervical outflow (No outflow vs. Light outflow vs. Plentiful outflow).</p><p>Semen was preferentially placed as deep as possible in the cervical canal, but</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Fresh or chilled semen doses extended with Andromed<sup>&#174;</sup> or OviXcell<sup>&#174;</sup> used to AI treated ewes</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="8"  >Assaf Ewes (n = 34)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >FGA + eCG (n = 17)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >MAP + eCG (n = 17)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Fresh (n = 8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Chilled (n = 9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Fresh (n = 8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Chilled (n = 9)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Andromed (n = 3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >OviXcell (n = 5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Andromed (n = 6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >OviXcell (n = 3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Andromed (n = 6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >OviXcell (n = 2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Andromed (n = 3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >OviXcell (n = 6)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>avoiding distress or trauma the mucosa. AI was performed using a vaginal speculum fitted with a white LED light and Quicklock<sup>&#174;</sup> guns covered with a Minitub sheath (Minit&#252;b, Tiefenbach, Deutschland).</p></sec><sec id="s2_7"><title>2.7. Pregnancy Diagnosis</title><p>Forty-one days (20/07/17) after AI (09/06/17) pregnancy diagnosis were conducted by real-time ultrasonography, using a Mindray Z5Vet ultra-sounder and a multi-frequency rectal probe (5.0 - 10.0 MHz).</p></sec><sec id="s2_8"><title>2.8. Statistical Analysis</title><p>Descriptive statistics are presented as mean &#177; standard deviation (coefficient of variation―c.v.). Data were statistically analyzed according to the ANOVA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref26">26</xref>] and Bonferroni\Dunn test [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref27">27</xref>] to detect difference between means. Distributions of external Os types were analyzed using the Chi-square (χ<sup>2</sup>) test [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref28">28</xref>] . All statistical analyses were performed using SAS Statistical Software, version 9.2 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref29">29</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>Assaf ewes were quite young - 2.0 &#177; 0.3 years old (c.v. = 15.2%). Age difference between FGA and MAP treated groups, inseminated with diverse semen extenders (Andromed<sup>&#174;</sup> vs. OviXcell<sup>&#174;</sup>), after semen preservation with unlike technics (Fresh vs. Chilled) was not significant (P &gt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). These results are probably related to age homogeneity of all ewes.</p><p>Ewes weighted 69.4 &#177; 11.2 kg (c.v. = 16.1%) and presented a BSC of 3.5 &#177; 0.5 points (c.v. = 13.3%). Weight and BSC differences between FGA and MAP</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Mean age, body weight and body score condition (BSC) of Assaf ewes by hormonal treatment, semen extender and preservation technique</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Age (years)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Weight (kg)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >BSC (points)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FGA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9<sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.9<sup>a</sup> &#177; 11.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5<sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MAP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0<sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.9<sup>a</sup> &#177; 11.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5<sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Andromed<sup>&#174;</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9<sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.9<sup>a</sup> &#177; 12.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.4<sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OviXcell<sup>&#174;</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0<sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.1<sup>a</sup> &#177; 9.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5<sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fresh</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0<sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.4<sup>a</sup> &#177; 13.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.7<sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chilled</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9<sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66,9<sup>a</sup> &#177; 8.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.3<sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.4</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>a = a, for P &gt; 0.05 (between lines).</p><p>treated groups, semen extenders groups and preservation technics groups were not significant (P &gt; 0.05). Assaf ewes presented a body weight and BSC suitable to breeding activity, regardless been at the 3 - 4<sup>th</sup> month of lactation. O’Brian [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref30">30</xref>] , Scaramuzzi and Martin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref31">31</xref>] and Karikariand and Blasu [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref32">32</xref>] says ewes should be bred with a BSC ranging between 2.5 - 3.0 points.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Physiological State Previous to Short-Term Progestagen Treatments</title><p>Before starting a reproduction control and AI program researchers should always check for ewes’ ovarian activity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref33">33</xref>] . At the second fortnight of May all ewes (n = 34) presented plasmatic levels of progesterone higher than 0.5 ng/ml, meaning they were cycling (100.0%). This outcome may reflect the pre-treatment of all ewes with melatonin implants or simply be the result of warmer environmental temperatures (late spring), more suitable to thermoregulation and consequently to reproduction activity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref35">35</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref36">36</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref37">37</xref>] .</p><p>Age, body weight and BSC had no significant effect in the physiological state prior to short-term progestagen treatments + eCG (P &gt; 0.05).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Ovarian Response to Short-Term Progestagen Treatments</title><p>Both short-term progestagen treatments + eCG were 100.0% efficient. Highly favorable body weight and BSC, warm environmental temperatures and prior ovarian cyclicity may have determined this result.</p><p>Progesterone plasmatic levels rose above 0.5 ng/ml for the first time around 28.9 &#177; 11.5 hours (c.v. = 39.7%) after eCG administration. Ovulatory response was rather fast, maybe due to the administration of 750 IU/ewe. eCG has been shown to reduce the interval between sponge withdrawal and estrus and improve the efficiency of synchronization of estrus and ovulation during the breeding season [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref38">38</xref>] . However, fertility rate tends to be maximum when AI is performed at the second half of the estrous, a few hours before ovulation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref39">39</xref>] .</p><p>Progestagens treatment (FGA―28.3 &#177; 12.7 hours vs. MAP―29.6 &#177; 10.5 hours) had no significant influence in this parameter (P &gt; 0.05). In small ruminants, FGA has a shorter half-life than MAP [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref40">40</xref>] . FGA induces an earlier return to ovarian cyclic activity (higher precision) than MAP, although, with no significant effect in estrus length [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref41">41</xref>] . Treatment with MAP sponges does not adequately synchronize estrus and ovulation among cyclic ewes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref41">41</xref>] . However, Abecia et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref2">2</xref>] , Ungerfeld e Rubianes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref42">42</xref>] , Zeleke et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref43">43</xref>] , Mateus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref44">44</xref>] , Afonso [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref45">45</xref>] and Dendena [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref46">46</xref>] were not able to establish any synchronization efficiency difference between FGA and MAP treatments. Present results meet these last investigators’ observations. Exogenous gonadotropin administration does advance ovulation and higher estrous synchronization precision [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref47">47</xref>] . They support ovarian mechanisms affecting follicular growth and maturation and promoting the proper luteinization of the CL [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref40">40</xref>] .</p><p>The interval between synchronization treatment and AI is very important [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref48">48</xref>] . Different investigators propose unlike intervals: 46 hours (Fernandez-Abella et al., 2003; cited by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref48">48</xref>] ), 48 - 72 hours (Karagiannidis et al., 2001; cited by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref48">48</xref>] ), 55 hours [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref46">46</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref49">49</xref>] and 58 - 63 hours [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref50">50</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref51">51</xref>] . The decision to inseminate 55 hours post eCG administration originated a reasonable fertility rate.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Artificial Insemination Response</title><p>About 76.5% of all Assaf ewes were pregnant 41 days after AI. This result was higher than many indicated in the bibliography for sheep: 50% - 65% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref49">49</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref52">52</xref>] , 65% - 75% (Colas and Gu&#233;rin 1979; cited by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref53">53</xref>] ), although Assaf ewes were mainly primiparous and the short interval between progestagens sponge removal and first CL formation. Ewes tend to present estrus 36 hours after progestagens sponge removal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref5">5</xref>] and to ovulate in 58 - 60 hours [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref33">33</xref>] . Other investigators report higher fertility rates 70% - 82% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref50">50</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref51">51</xref>] , 82.2% (Hill et al., 1998 and Ehling et al., 2003; cited by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref48">48</xref>] ), 85.1% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref46">46</xref>] and 80% - 90% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref48">48</xref>] .</p><sec id="s3_3_1"><title>3.3.1. eCG</title><p>Fertility rate after AI depends on eCG dose [Hill et al., 1998; cited by 47]: 200 IU―62.4%, 250 IU―72.9%, 300 IU―79.1% and 375 IU―&gt;69.4%. Dendena [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref46">46</xref>] stated a fertility rate of 85.1% after the administration of 500 IU of eCG. In the present paper, the administration of 750 IU of eCG determined a fertility rate of 76.5%. Racial differences may partially explain the results [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref54">54</xref>] . Less prolific and less seasonal breeds tend to be more responsive to eCG administration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref53">53</xref>] . Different follicular populations present on the ovaries before progestagen treatments + eCG may also condition fertility rate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref41">41</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref54">54</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_2"><title>3.3.2. Semen Preservation Technic</title><p>Fertility rates tend to be smaller after AI with chilled semen than with fresh semen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref55">55</xref>] ―56.7% (Fernandez-Abella et al., 2003; cited by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref48">48</xref>] ) or 74% - 76% (Gerg&#225;tz and Gy&#246;k&#233;r, 1997; cited by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref48">48</xref>] ). Dendena [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref45">45</xref>] found exactly the opposite (Fresh: 79.4% vs. Chilled: 90.9%). During semen chilling the sperm cells lose motility, suffer morphological changes and decay survive ability in the female genital tract, resulting in lower fertility rates and higher embryonic mortality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref56">56</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref57">57</xref>] . In the present work, fertility rate was not conditioned by semen preservation technic (Fresh: 81.3% vs. Chilled: 72.2%) (χ<sup>2</sup> = 2.3; P &gt; 0.05).</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_3"><title>3.3.3. Semen Extender</title><p>Semen extenders are expected to increase extended semen volume, stabilize pH (buffer effect), keep adequate osmolality, provide energy to spermatozoa and protect them from possible bacteria and fungus infections, cold shock and preservation process [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref58">58</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref63">63</xref>] resulting in osmotic stress and reactive oxygen species (ROS) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref57">57</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref60">60</xref>] .</p><p>Semen extender did not affect fertility rate (Andromed<sup>&#174;</sup>: 77.8% vs. OviXcell<sup>&#174;</sup>: 75.0%) (χ<sup>2</sup> = 0.3; P &gt; 0.05). Though Andromed<sup>&#174;</sup> was developed to preserve bull semen and OviXcell<sup>&#174;</sup> to preserve ram semen their effects on fertility rate were identical. Dendena [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref46">46</xref>] also found no significant difference between semen extenders (Andromed<sup>&#174;</sup> vs. INRA 96<sup>&#174;</sup>) in fertility rate.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_4"><title>3.3.4. Color and Lubrication of Vagina and Cervical Viscosity</title><p>In cervical AI, semen is usually placed in the anterior portion of the cervix [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref63">63</xref>] . So, semen transportation through the cervical canal depends on cervical mucus volume and quality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref64">64</xref>] . All Assaf ewes presented a Pink vaginal mucosa and a Good lubrication (100.0%). Cervical mucus has Liquid in all ewes (100.0%). These results are possibly related to short-term progestagens + eCG treatments and to the time of AI and reveals that ewes were well-fed, healthy and in an advanced stage of the follicular phase or early stage of the luteal phase. Dendena [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref46">46</xref>] reported that the majority of Churra Galega Bragan&#231;ana Branca ewes presented a Pink color and highly lubricated vagina.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_5"><title>3.3.5. Cervical External Os</title><p>Assaf ewes presented all types of external Os in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref24">24</xref>] classification table (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). The same was found by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref46">46</xref>] in Churra Galega Bragan&#231;ana Branca ewes. Os types frequency variation was significant (χ<sup>2</sup> = 13.8; P ≤ 0.01). Nevertheless frequency distribution was uniform, but for Slit type (less frequent). Frequency distribution registered by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref46">46</xref>] was quite different and may be due to genetics, age and parity factors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref54">54</xref>] .</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Anatomical conformation of the cervical external Os (frequency) and its relation to fertility rate</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >External Os</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fertility rate</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Duckbill</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.6%<sup>a</sup> (7/34)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.7%<sup>x</sup> (6/7)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Slit</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.8%<sup>b</sup> (3/34)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.3%<sup>y</sup> (1/3)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rose</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.4%<sup>a,c,e</sup> (10/34)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.0%<sup>z,x</sup> (8/10)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Papilla</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.5%<sup>a,d,e</sup> (6/34)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0%<sup>w,z,v</sup> (6/8)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Flap</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.6%<sup>a,b,f</sup> (5/34)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.9%<sup>v,x,y,w</sup> (5/6)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>a ≠ b, for P ≤ 0.05; b ≠ d, for P ≤ 0.01; b ≠ c, for P ≤ 0.001; x ≠ w, for P ≤ 0.05; x ≠ y, y ≠ z, y ≠ w, y ≠ v, for P ≤ 0.001 (between lines).</p><p>External Os type influenced fertility rate (χ<sup>2</sup> = 93.5; P &lt; 0.001) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). The same was registered by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref45">45</xref>] . Pappila (100.0%), Flap (88.9%), Duckbill (85.7%) and Rose (80.0%) types were related to high fertility rates. On the opposite, Slit type was related to the lowest fertility rate. Dendena [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref46">46</xref>] found the highest fertility rates among ewes with Papilla and Slit types of the external Os.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_6"><title>3.3.6. Semen Deposition Place</title><p>Fertility rate is higher when semen is placed deeper in the cervix during cervical insemination [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref65">65</xref>] . Spanish sheep breeds with low fertility rate (Assaf and Churra) present a more complex cervical canal, which impairs deep penetration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref65">65</xref>] . Cervix distress or trauma may condition fertility rate by affecting semen transport and viability in the female genital tract, originated by an influx of immune cells to the cervical canal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref66">66</xref>] . In the present study, semen was mainly placed after the first cervical fold (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). Dendena [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref46">46</xref>] reported the same. Fertility rate was quite high (78.8%). The only vaginal inseminated ewe did not get pregnant (0.0%). This author found the same rate of fertility in Churra Galega Bragan&#231;ana Branca ewes when semen was left in the vagina or after the first cervical fold (Vagina: 88.9% vs. 1&#186;: 88.2%).</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_7"><title>3.3.7. Cervical Outflow</title><p>Low fertility rates are related to semen cervical outflow in sheep [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref14">14</xref>] . Cervical outflow should be avoided [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref46">46</xref>] , especially when it is plentiful [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81621-ref46">46</xref>] . In the present work, most ewes inseminated after the first fold did not present any cervical outflow (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>) and resulted in a high fertility rate (81.5%). Ewes with a light outflow presented a lower fertility rate (66.7%) (χ<sup>2</sup> = 81.9; P &lt; 0.001).</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>・ On the second fortnight of May, Assaf ewes were all cycling.</p><p>・ Both short-term progestagens (FGA e MAP) + eCG were 100.0% efficient.</p><p>・ FGA and MAP showed equal precision controlling first CL formation (FGA - 28.3 &#177; 12.7 days vs. MAP - 29.6 &#177; 10.5 days.</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Semen deposition place (frequency) and fertility rate</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Semen deposition place</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fertility rate</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vagina</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.9%<sup>a</sup> (1/34)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0%<sup>x</sup> (0/1)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1<sup>st</sup> fold</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.1%<sup>b</sup> (33/34)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.8%<sup>y</sup> (26/33)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>a ≠ b for P ≤ 0.0001; x ≠ y for P ≤ 0.001 (between lines).</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Cervical outflow (frequency) and fertility rate</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cervical outflow</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fertility rate</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27/33 (81.8%<sup>a</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22/27 (81.5%<sup>x</sup>)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Light</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6/33 (18.2%<sup>b</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4/6 (66.7%<sup>y</sup>)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>a ≠ b, for P ≤ 0.0001; x ≠ y for P ≤ 0.05 (between lines).</p><p>・ Forty-one days after AI 76.5% of the Assaf ewes were pregnant.</p><p>・ Fertility rate was significantly affected by external Os type, semen deposition place (Vagina: 0.0% vs. 1&#186;: 78.8%) and seminal cervix outflow (No outflow: 81.5% vs. Light outflow: 66.7%).</p><p>・ Fertility rate was not significantly influenced by vagina color (Pink: 100.0%) and cervical mucus viscosity (Liquid: 100%), semen extender (Andromed<sup>&#174;</sup>: 77.8% vs. OviXcell<sup>&#174;</sup>: 75.0%) or semen preservation technic (Fresh: 81.3% vs. Chilled: 72.2%).</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Animal Rights</title><p>This experiment comply with the ARRIVE guidelines and have be carried out in accordance with the U.K. Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act, 1986 and associated guidelines, EU Directive 2010/63/EU for animal experiments.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflict of Interest</title><p>The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Acknowledgments</title><p>The authors wish to thank Dra. Angelita Walker Duarte for her help in the English review of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Fornazari, R., Mateus, &#211;., Correia, T., Quintas, H., Maur&#237;cio, R., Conradi, A., Francisco, L., &#193;lvaro, A. and Valentim, R. (2018) Estrus Synchronization and Artificial Insemination with Fresh and Chilled Semen in Assaf Ewes. Agricultural Sciences, 9, 8-22. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2018.91002</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.81621-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Azevedo, J.M., Valentim, R.C. and Correia, T.M. (2006) Hormonal Control of Sheep Ovarian Activity [Controlo Hormonal da Actividade Ovárica em Ovinos]. Albéitar Portuguesa, 2, 4-8. 
https://bibliotecadigital.ipb.pt/bitstream/10198/6302/1/Albeitar%20Control%20Act% 
20Ov%C3%A1rica%206%20%282006%29.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abecia, J.A., Forcada, F. and González-Bulnes, A. (2012) Hormonal Control of Reproduction in Small Ruminants. Animal Reproduction Science, 130, 173-179.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2012.01.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Valentim, R., Rodrigues, i., Montenegro, T., Sacoto, S. and Azevedo, J. (2015) Reproduction Management in Sheep and Goat. 4. Breeding Activity Control in Small Ruminants—Natural Methods [Maneio Reprodutivo em Ovinos e Caprinos. 4. Controlo da Atividade Reprodutiva em Pequenos Ruminantes—Métodos Naturais]. Agrotec, 17, 19-23. 
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282327460_Maneio_reprodutivo 
_em_ovinos_e_caprinos_4_Controlo_da_atividade_ 
reprodutiva_em_pequenos_ruminantes_-_metodos_naturais</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baril, G., Chemineau, P., Cognié, Y., Guérin, Y., Leboeuf, B., Orgeur, P. and Vallet, J.-C. (1993) Manuel de Formation pour L'insémination Artificielle chez les Ovins et les Caprins. étude FAO Production et Santé Animales, Rome. 
http://www.fao.org/docrep/009/t0121f/t0121f00.htm</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gordon, i. (1997) Controlled Reproduction in Sheep and Goats. CABi Publishing University Press, Cambridge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Leboeuf, B., Restall, B. and Salamon, S. (2000) Production and Storage of Goat Semen for Artificial insemination. Animal Reproduction Science, 62, 113-141. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00156-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Aisen, E.G. (2004a) Processing and Conservation of Semen [Procesamiento y Conservación del Material Seminal]. in: Aisen, E.G., Ed., Reproducción Ovina y Caprina, Chapter 6, intermédica Editora, Sao Paulo, 73-86.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Granados, L.B.C., Dias, A.J.B. and Sales, M.P. (2006) General issues in Goat and Sheep Reproduction [Aspectos Gerais da Reprodu&amp;#231;ao de Caprinos e Ovinos]. State University of North Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, Rio de Janeiro.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Valentim, R., Rodrigues, i., Montenegro, T., Sacoto, S., Azevedo, J. and Gomes, M.J. (2016a) Reproduction Management in Sheep and Goat. 7. Artificial insemination in Sheep and Goat [Maneio Reprodutivo em Ovinos e Caprinos. 7. insemina&amp;#231;ao Artificial em Ovinos e Caprinos]. Agrotec, 21, 10-13. 
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307571147_Maneio_Reprodutivo_em_Ovinos_e_ 
Caprinos_7_inseminacao_Artificial_em_Ovinos_e_Caprinos</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chemineau, P., Malpaux, B., Pelletier, J., Lebouf, B., Delgadillo, J.A., Deletang, F., Pobel, T. and Brice, G. (1996) Emploi des implants de Mélatonine et des Traitements Photopériodiques pour Maitriser la Reproduction Saisonnière chez les Ovins et les Caprins. iNRA Productions Animales, 9, 45-60. 
http://prodinra.inra.fr/record/125116</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Aisen, E.G.M (2004b) Artificial insemination in Ewe and Goat [inseminación Artificial de Ovejas y Cabras]. in: Aisen, E.G., Ed., Reproducción Ovina y Caprina, Chapter 8, intermédica Editora, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 99-114.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anel, L., Alvarez, M., Martinez-Pastor, F., Garcia-Macias, V., Anel, E. and de Paz, P. (2006) improvement Strategies in Ovine Artificial insemination. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 41, 30-42.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Candappa, i.B.R. and Bartlewski, P.M. (2011) A Review of Advances in Artificial insemination (Ai) and Embryo Transfer (ET) in Sheep, with the Special Reference to Hormonal induction of Cervical Dilation and its implications for Controlled Animal Reproduction and Surgical Techniques. The Open Reproductive Science Journal, 3, 162-175. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874255601103010162</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Morrell, J.M. (2011) Artificial insemination: Current and Future Trends. in: Manafi, M., Ed., Artificial insemination in Farm Animals, Chapter 1, inTech, Rijeka, 1-14.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cseh, S., Faigl, V. and Amiridis, G.S. (2012) Semen Processing and Artificial insemination in Health Management of Small Ruminants. Animal Reproduction Science, 130, 187-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2012.01.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Palacios, C. and Abecia, J.A. (2015) Meteorological Variables Affect Fertility Rate after intrauterine Artificial insemination in Sheep in a Seasonal-Dependent Manner: A 7-Year Study. international Journal of Biometeorology, 59, 585-592.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-014-0872-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abecia, J.A., Arrébola, F., Macías, A., Lavina, A., González-Casquet, O., Benítez, F. and Palacios, C. (2016) Temperature and Rainfall Are Related to Fertility Rate after Spring Artificial insemination in Small Ruminants. international Journal of Biometeorology, 60, 1603-1609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-016-1150-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Valentim, R., Rodrigues, i., Montenegro, T., Sacoto, S. and Azevedo, J. (2016) Reproduction Management in Sheep and Goat. 5. Breeding Activity Control in Small Ruminants—Hormonal Methods. Agrotec, 18, 25-28. 
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282327460_Maneio_reprodutivo_em_ovinos_e_ 
caprinos_4_Controlo_da_atividade_reprodutiva_em_pequenos_ruminantes_-_metodos_naturais</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Romano, J.E., Alkar, A. and Amstalden, M. (2017) Onset of Luteolytic Action of Exogenous Prostaglandin F2 during Estrous Cycle in Goats. Theriogenology, 92, 45-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.12.019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tsakmakidis, i.A. (2010) Ram Semen Evaluation: Development and Efficiency of Modern Techniques. Small Ruminant Research, 92, 126-130.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2010.04.017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Banday, M.N., Lone, F.A., Rasool, F., Rashid, M. and Shikari, A. (2017) Use of Antioxidants Reduce Lipid Peroxidation and improve Quality of Crossbred Ram Sperm during its Cryopreservation. Cryobiology, 74, 25-30.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2016.12.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Konyali, C., Tomas, C., Blanch, E., Gomez, E.A., Graham, J.K. and Mocé, E. (2013) Optimizing Conditions for Treating Goat Semen with Cholesterol-Loaded Cyclodextrins Prior to Freezing to improve Cryosurvival. Cryobiology, 67, 124-131.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2013.06.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Russel, A.J.F., Doney, J.M. and Gunn, R.G. (1969) Subjective Assessment of Fat in Live Sheep. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 72, 451-454.  
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600024874</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Correia, T.M.M.A.A. (1996) Study of Churra Galega Bragan&amp;#231;ana Ewes Seasonality. [Contributo para o Estudo da Sazonalidade Reprodutiva das Ovelhas da Ra&amp;#231;a Churra Galega Bragan&amp;#231;ana.] MSc Thesis, CiHEAM-iAMZ, Zaragoza.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kershaw, C.M., Khalid, M., McGowan, M.R., ingram, K., Leethongdee, S., Wax, G. and Scaramuzzi, R.J. (2005) The Anatomy of the Sheep Cervix and its influence on the Transcervical Passage of an inseminating Pipette into the Uterine Lumen. Theriogenology, 64, 1225-1235.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.02.017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J.H. (1980) Principles and Procedures of Statistics. 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill Company, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dunn, O.J. (1961) Multiple Comparisons among Means. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 56, 52-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1961.10482090</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1980) Statistical Methods. 7th Edition, iowa State University Press, Ames.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">SAS institute inc. (2009) SAS 9.2 Stored Processes: Developer’s Guide. SAS institute inc., Cary. 
https://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/stpug/61271/PDF/default/stpug.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">O’Brein, A. (2002) Flushing the Ewe Flock: is it Beneficial? in: Animal Science FactSheets, Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Ontario. 
http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/livestock/sheep/facts/02-055.htm</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Scaramuzzi, R.J. and Martin, G.B. (2008) The importance of interactions among Nutrition, Seasonality and Socio-Sexual Factors in the Development of Hormone-Free Methods for Controlling Fertility. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 43, 129-136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01152.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Karikari, P.K. and Blasu, E.Y. (2009) influence of Nutritional Flushing Prior to Mating on the Performance of West African Dwarf Goats Mated in the Rainy Season. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 8, 1068-1073.  
https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2009.1068.1073</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Steyn, J.J. (2003) Application of Artificial insemination (Ai) on Commercial Sheep and Goat Production. in: Proceeding Simpósio internacional sobre Caprinos e Ovinos de Corte, 2. Simpósio internacional sobre Agronegócio da Caprinocultura Leiteira, EMEPA-DA, Joao Pessoa, 367-379.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Al-Azraqi, A.A. (2007) Effect of Fasting on Luteal Function, Leptin and Steroids Concentration during Oestrous Cycle of the Goat in Natural Photo-Status. Animal Reproduction Science, 98, 343-349.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2006.05.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dobson, H., Fergani, C., Routly, J.E. and Smith, R.F. (2012) Effects of Stress on Reproduction in Ewes. Animal Reproduction Science, 130, 135-140.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2012.01.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">álvaro, A.C.N. (2014) Post-Partum Physiology Anestrus in Churra Galega Bragan&amp;#231;ana Ewes Lambed in Fall. [Anestro Fisiológico Pós-parto em Ovelhas Churras Galegas Bragan&amp;#231;anas Paridas no Outono.] MSc. Thesis, Polytechnic institute of Bragan&amp;#231;a, Braganza. 
https://bibliotecadigital.ipb.pt/bitstream/10198/11429/1/Armindo%20%C3%81lvaro.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Silva, T.P.D., Torreao, J.N.C., Marques, C.A.T., Araújo, M.J., Bezerra, L.R., Dhanasekaran, K.D. and Sejian, V. (2016) Effect of Multiple Stress Factors (Thermal, Nutritional and Pregnancy Type) on Adaptive Capability of Native Ewes under Semi-Arid Environment. Journal of Thermal Biology, 59, 39-46.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2016.05.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ustuner, B., Günay, V., Nur, Z. and Ustuner, H. (2007) Effects of Long and Short Term Progestagen Treatements Combined with PMSG on Oestrus Synchronization and Fertility in Awassi Ewes during the Breeding Season. Acta Veterinaria Brunensis, 76, 391-397. https://doi.org/10.2754/avb200776030391</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Freitas, V.J.F. and Rubianes, E. (2004) Female Preparation. Estrus Detection and Ovulation Control. [Preparación de las Hembras. Detección e Control del Estro y de la Ovulación.] in: Aisen, E.G., Ed., Sheep and Goat Reproduction [Reproducción Ovina y Caprina], Chapter 7, intermédica Editora, Sao Paulo, 87-98.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Romano, J.E. (1996) Comparison of Fluorgestone and Medroxyprogesterone intravaginal Pessaries for Estrus Synchronization in Dairy Goats. Small Ruminant Research, 22, 219-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(96)00893-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Leyva, V., Buckrell, B.C. and Walton, J.S. (1998) Regulation of Follicular Activity and Ovulation in Ewes by Exogenous Progestogen. Theriogenology, 50, 395-416.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(98)00148-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ungerfeld, R. and Rubianes, E. (2002) Short Term Primings with Different Progestogen intravaginal Devices (MAP, FGA and CiDR) for eCG-Estrous induction in Anestrus Ewes. Small Ruminant Research, 46, 63-66.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(02)00105-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zeleke, M., Greyling, J.P.C., Schwalbach, L.M.J., Muller, T. and Erasmus, J.A. (2005) Effect of Progestagen and PMSG on Oestrous Synchronization and Fertility in Dorper Ewes during the Transition Period. Small Ruminant Research, 56, 47-53.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2003.12.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mateus, O.J.P. (2014) Breeding Control in Awassi x Sarda Ewes. [Controlo Reprodutivo em Ovelhas Awassi x Sarda.] MSc Thesis, Polytechnic institute of Bragan&amp;#231;a, Braganza. 
https://bibliotecadigital.ipb.pt/bitstream/10198/11754/1/ 
Tese%20%C3%93scar%20%28Final%C3%ADssima%29.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Afonso, F.M.T. (2015) Advance of the Breeding Season in Churra Galega Bragan&amp;#231;ana Ewes. [Antecipa&amp;#231;ao da Esta&amp;#231;ao Reprodutiva em Ovelhas da Ra&amp;#231;a Churra Galega Bragan&amp;#231;a.] MSc Thesis, Polytechnic institute of Bragan&amp;#231;a, Braganza. (in Press)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dendena, M.W. (2017) Reproduction Activity Control in Churra Galega Bragan&amp;#231;ana Ewes. [Controlo da Actividade Reprodutiva e insemina&amp;#231;ao Artificial em Ovelhas da Ra&amp;#231;a Churra Galega Bragan&amp;#231;ana.] MSc Thesis, Polytechnic institute of Bragan&amp;#231;a, Braganza. 
https://bibliotecadigital.ipb.pt/bitstream/10198/14178/1/FiNAL.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Letelier, C.A., Contreras-Solis, i., García-Fernández, R.A., Sánchez, M.A., García-Palencia, P., Sánchez, B., Ariznavarreta, C., Tresguerres, J.A.F., Flores, J.M. and Gonzalez-Bulnes, A. (2011) Effects of Oestrus induction with Progestagens or Prostaglandin Analogues on Ovarian and Pituitary Function in Sheep. Animal Reproduction Science, 126, 61-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2011.04.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Kukovics, S., Gy&amp;#214;kér, S., Németh, T. and Gergátz, E. (2011) Artificial insemination of Sheep—Possibilities, Realities and Techniques at the Farm Level. in: Manafi, M., Ed., Veterinary Medicine and Science, Chapter 3, inTech, Rijeka, 27-50.  
https://doi.org/10.5772/16642</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Valentim, R., Fernandes, M., Azevedo, J., Mendon&amp;#231;a, A., Almeida, J., Velasco, H., Simoes, J., Fontes, P., Maurício, R., Cardoso, M. and Correia, T. (2009) Advance of the Breeding Season in Churra Galega Bragan&amp;#231;ana Ewes. Artificial insemination. [Anticipación de la Estación Reproductiva en Ovejas de la Raza Churra Galega Bragan&amp;#231;ana. inseminación Artificial.] Proceedings 34 Congreso Nacional de la Sociedad Espanola de Ovinotecnia y Caprinotecnia, Barbastro, 403-407.  
http://seoc.eu/es/2009-barbastro/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Donovan, A., Hanrahan, J.P., Lally, T., Boland, M.P., Lonergan, G.P. and O’Neil, D.J. (2001) Ai for Sheep using Frozen-Thawed Semen. ARMiS 4047 Project Report, Under the Research Stimulus Fund; OPARDF Measure 5b. 
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242167475_Ai_for_sheep_using_frozen-thawed_semen</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Donovan, A., Hanrahan, J.P., Kummen, E., Duffy, P. and Boland, M.P. (2004) Fertility in the Ewe Following Cervical insemination with Fresh or Frozen-Thawed Semen at a Natural or Synchronised Oestrus. Animal Reproduction Science, 84, 359-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2003.12.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Ax, R.L., Dally, M.R., Didion, B.A., Lenz, R.W., Love, C.C., Varner, D.D., Hafez, B. and Bellin, M.E. (2004) Artificial insemination [insemina&amp;#231;ao Artificial]. in: Hafez, E.S.E. and Hafez, B., Eds., Animal Reproduction [Reprodu&amp;#231;ao Animal], 7th Edition, Manole Editor, Sao Paulo, 381-394.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cognié, Y. (1988) Nouvelles Méthodes Utilisées pour Améliorer les Performances de Reproduction chez les Ovins. iNRA Productions Animales, 1, 83-92.  
http://prodinra.inra.fr/record/141987</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Omontese, B.O., Rekwot, P.i., Ate, i.U., Ayo, J.O., Kawu, M.U., Rwuaan, J.S., Nwannenna, A.i., Mustapha, R.A. and Bello, A.A. (2016) An Update on Oestrus Synchronisation of Goats in Nigeria. Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction, 5, 96-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjr.2016.01.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Aral, F., Temamogullari, F. and Aral, S.S. (2011) Mechanical and Pharmacologic Applications of Artificial insemination in Ewes. in: Manafi, M., Ed., Veterinary Medicine and Science, Chapter 14, inTech, Rijeka, 243-254.  
https://doi.org/10.5772/16564</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Paulenz, H., S&amp;#214;derquist, L., Pérez-Pé, R. and Berger, K.A. (2002) Effect of Different Extenders and Storage Temperature on Sperm Viability of Liquid Ram Semen. Theriogenology, 57, 823-836. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00683-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">O’Hara, L., Hanrahan, J.P., Richardson, L., Donovan, A., Fair, S., Vans, A.C.O. and Lonergan, O. (2010) Effect of Storage Duration, Storage Temperature, and Diluent on the Viability and Fertility of Fresh Ram Sperm. Theriogenology, 73, 541-549.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.10.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Salamon, S. and Maxwell, W.M.C. (2000) Storage of Ram Semen. Animal Reproduction Science, 62, 77-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00155-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">O’Meara, C.M., Donovan, A., Hanrahan, J.P., Duffy, P., Fair, S., Evans, A.C.O. and Lonergan, P. (2007) Resuspending Ram Spermatozoa in Seminal Plasma after Cryopreservation Does not improve Pregnancy Rate in Cervically inseminated Ewes. Theriogenology, 67, 1262-1268.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.01.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bernardini, A., Hozbor, F., Sanchez, E., Fornés, M.W., Alberio, R.H. and Cesari, A. (2011) Conserved Ram Seminal Plasma Proteins Bind to the Sperm Membrane and Repair Cryopreservation Damage. Theriogenology, 76, 436-447.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.02.020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Amidi, F., Pazhohan, Maryam, A., Nashtaei, S., Khodarahmian, M. and Nekoonam, S. (2016) The Role of Antioxidants in Sperm Freezing: A Review. Cell Tissue Bank, 17, 745-756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-016-9566-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sieme, H., Oldenhof, H. and Wolkers, W.F. (2016) Mode of Action of Cryoprotectants for Sperm Preservation. Animal Reproduction Science, 169, 2-5.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2016.02.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arando, A., Gonzalez, A., Delgado, J.V., Arrebola, F.A. and Perez-Marín, C.C. (2017) Storage Temperature and Sucrose Concentrations Affect Ram Sperm Quality after Vitrification. Animal Reproduction Science, 181, 175-185.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2017.04.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Santolaria, P., Palacin, i. and Yaniz, J. (2011) Management Factors Affecting Fertility in Sheep. Chapter 11, inTech, Rijeka, 167-190.  
https://doi.org/10.5772/18013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kaabi, M., Alvarez, M., Anel, E., Chamorro, C.A., Boixo, J.C., de Paz, P. and Anel, L. (2006) influence of Breed and Age on Morphometry and Depth of inseminating Catheter Penetration in the Ewe Cervix: A Postmortem Study. Theriogenology, 66, 1876-1883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.04.039</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81621-ref66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fonseca, J.F., Cruz, R.C., Pinto, P.H.N. and Facó, O. (2010) Artificial insemination in Sheep and Goat. [insemina&amp;#231;ao Artificial em Ovinos e Caprinos.] Proceedings of the i Workshop sobre Ciência Animal na Bahia, BA-UESC, ilhéus, 1-30.  
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/102769/1/AAC-inseminacao-artificial.pdf</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>