<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Modern Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-1196</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmp.2011.210138</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMP-8049</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Electromotive Force Generation with Hydrogen Release by Salt Water Flow under a Transverse Magnetic Field
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>oberto</surname><given-names>De Luca</given-names></name><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>rdeluca@unisa.it</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>10</month><year>2011</year></pub-date><volume>02</volume><issue>10</issue><fpage>1115</fpage><lpage>1119</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>January</day>	<month>7,</month>	<year>2011</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>May</day>	<month>6,</month>	<year>2011</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>June</day>	<month>10,</month>	<year>2011</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  By considering an electrolyte solution in motion in a duct under a transverse magnetic field, we notice that a so called Faraday voltage arises because of the Lorentz force acting on anions and cations in the fluid. When salt water is considered, hydrogen production takes place at one of the electrodes if an electric current, generated by Faraday voltage, flows in an external circuit. The maximum amount of hydrogen production rate is calculated by basic electrochemical concepts.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Renewable Energies</kwd><kwd> Hydrogen Production</kwd><kwd> Faraday Voltage</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Aqueous ionic solutions and conducting metals show some similarities in their electrical transport properties. One of the simplest phenomenological laws of classical electrodynamics is Ohm’s law of conduction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.8049-ref1">1</xref>], namely</p><disp-formula id="scirp.8049-formula99526"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500266\12c5eae0-7a0d-488f-91aa-94e561791124.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="4-7500266\30cca532-2644-4765-86bb-4b2be78cf5b7.jpg" /> is the current density flowing under the effect of the electric field<img src="4-7500266\ee8298ef-021f-439b-b218-78bce3f25a96.jpg" />, and s is the electrical conductivity of the material. A similar relation can be found in electrolyte solutions. In the latter case, the partial conductivities can be expressed in terms of the mobility m<sub>P</sub> of cations and m<sub>N</sub> of anions, so that:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.8049-formula99527"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500266\1292c072-f2d2-4d19-8dfa-436db36aa47c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="4-7500266\be935180-d958-4d8c-a0c2-e4f1a3029722.jpg" /> is the volume density of both types of ions and e is the electron charge. Mobility, on its turn, is defined as the proportionality constant linking the ions velocity <img src="4-7500266\50e2e535-36e7-4dbd-83f1-8d4b1419a995.jpg" /> and the electric field<img src="4-7500266\1af45e7f-7d79-4331-90ca-8bd1b1129d1d.jpg" />, according to the following:<img src="4-7500266\cadae348-0dc2-49a8-a933-3148522480b2.jpg" />. We recall that the total conductivity s is given by<img src="4-7500266\70a5cb37-464b-4789-a756-f484b24da720.jpg" />.</p><p>It is well known that Lorentz force acts on charged particles moving in the presence of a magnetic field. Let us then consider anions and cations in an electrolyte solution flowing in a duct with velocity<img src="4-7500266\42220973-5003-4a70-99c3-3314ffcdc1a3.jpg" />, where <img src="4-7500266\49ce8cd5-27e5-4ef7-90a8-00906c0ec03d.jpg" /> is the velocity of the particles measured with respect to a reference frame moving with the aqueous solution. In the presence of a constant magnetic field<img src="4-7500266\2524199a-033b-436e-859f-9f28db3e5c86.jpg" />, these ions are subject to a Lorentz force given by:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.8049-formula99528"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500266\f8b57562-f79d-4c26-95d9-174cd38de547.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the plus and minus signs refer to cations and anions, respectively, both assumed to have ionic charge Ze in absolute value (Z thus being their valence). Because of Lorentz force, a voltage difference<img src="4-7500266\602f94de-460d-40af-bd2b-5f18c6b1e6fd.jpg" />, known in the literature as Faraday voltage [2,3], appears between the electrodes A and B of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. This voltage, similarly to what observed in the Hall’s effect in metals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.8049-ref1">1</xref>], can be expressed as the product<img src="4-7500266\c3f482bc-204f-4881-9858-70595c797f6b.jpg" />, when the electrolyte flows in a circular pipe of diameter D. Notice that in the present work boldface letters and corresponding plain text letters are used for vectors and their amplitudes, respectively. Geselowitz [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.8049-ref4">4</xref>] has shown that this result is valid for any velocity profile, provided the flow is axially symmetric. It can also be shown that this result is valid, in particular, for a thin rectangular wire [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.8049-ref5">5</xref>].</p><p>In the present work we propose an electromotive force (e.m.f.) generator consisting of a rectangular pipe with two lateral conducting plates enclosing salt water in motion under a magnetic field orthogonal to the flow velocity vector (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). A similar system has already been proposed by Yamaguchi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.8049-ref6">6</xref>] for a non-poison electro-conductive polymer and its mixture with magnetic fluid. We here also notice that, taking salt water solution as the electrolyte flowing in the rectangular pipe, hydrogen gas is formed at one of the two electrodes of the e.m.f. generator proposed. In the present work we calculate a general expression for the rate of production of hydrogen gas as a function of the flux rate of salt wa-</p><p>ter flowing within the rectangular pipe. Experimental work is awaited to provide validation of the proposed analysis and to suggest further development of the topic of hydrogen production by salt water.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Faraday Voltage</title><p>Let us consider the schematic view of the e.m.f. generator given in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. Take the magnetic field along the z-direction and the velocity <img src="4-7500266\f268036b-4fbd-478c-b11f-ba55f9156004.jpg" /> along the x-axis. Assume a velocity profile<img src="4-7500266\e25fc427-3eda-4823-8589-1acda9bb2478.jpg" />, and neglect, in the calculation of<img src="4-7500266\207dee40-c2dd-4124-be3d-25bfc8c2ee1e.jpg" />, the amplitude of the drift velocities <img src="4-7500266\1fe083e7-91d6-4e3c-afc7-21ac41ef6319.jpg" /> with respect to the average velocity of the fluid within the rectangular pipe<img src="4-7500266\244f6a79-326a-40d9-8747-d8eeef7ec692.jpg" />. Under these hypotheses we may write the voltage drop <img src="4-7500266\b434f632-e492-4092-8a8a-d3b7001fa949.jpg" /> across the two conductors as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.8049-formula99529"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500266\937ca850-2635-4eb1-b554-d1c8b8af306d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Notice that a factor of two appears in Equation (4), differently from what reported by Yamaguchi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.8049-ref6">6</xref>], because of the presence of two ionic species in the electrolyte in our case. A detailed analysis of the dynamical problem is given in the Appendix, also to clarify how the low mobility coefficients for sodium and chlorine ions give drift velocities which are in amplitude much smaller than<img src="4-7500266\371ef38a-4009-4630-9590-79ea22e85b68.jpg" />.</p><p>By considering the equivalent circuit in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, where<img src="4-7500266\5d5f9dbe-3d88-40cc-972b-a44aa23f0540.jpg" />, <img src="4-7500266\ceb03598-9fcc-4fab-b2b1-37a2b4cee88a.jpg" />being the conductivity of the electrolyte solution, we may write:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.8049-formula99530"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500266\6223bd66-57c1-488b-a9da-b8db914944da.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="4-7500266\d9418f4b-e0d7-4a84-9051-4acedd7b2db1.jpg" /> and a multiplicative factor of 4 is present when comparing the above result with that obtained by Yamaguchi et al.[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.8049-ref6">6</xref>], because of Equation (4).</p><p>The above formula can be derived by setting <img src="4-7500266\8769117c-2aac-461c-825e-5b7d1de3ec09.jpg" /> <img src="4-7500266\abcf50f7-ff9f-49be-aec3-ffbe186458e5.jpg" />, where <img src="4-7500266\7b2a4f01-4407-418a-b3cf-6b310fb07905.jpg" /> is the voltage output of the device as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. In order to estimate of the maximum power output (obtained for<img src="4-7500266\ae8c2a6a-5401-4744-8036-1c730511bacf.jpg" />) in terms of the average water flow rate Q, for which<img src="4-7500266\f39def45-727d-425b-9127-51da59648fc9.jpg" />, we write</p><disp-formula id="scirp.8049-formula99531"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500266\8d71e8b4-4276-4561-ae22-7bc0ffa91910.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Therefore, for seawater at room temperature, by taking</p><p><img src="4-7500266\61ea6c1c-42c3-436b-b5f0-ca19e10d88cb.jpg" />, <img src="4-7500266\1e849fbd-840e-4408-85ae-2e20862e02ee.jpg" />, <img src="4-7500266\7896663b-c4c0-4d9e-bd82-123c77a42596.jpg" />, <img src="4-7500266\cacd1e63-ea1c-4326-b93e-26357f6cfc8e.jpg" />,</p><p><img src="4-7500266\dcb24909-3c7b-41d7-90f1-9d2d07ea0fe3.jpg" />, and<img src="4-7500266\e39c73e5-df55-4f98-8c79-cb6ad330d45e.jpg" />, we have <img src="4-7500266\2077d06d-12f0-43b9-8bfc-e08aaa36de72.jpg" /> and<img src="4-7500266\c2fcf838-4acc-4c62-ab0b-81d13f30d2c0.jpg" />. Notice that the power output depends on the square of the average velocity<img src="4-7500266\f4a42bc8-bc0a-4401-a8ca-f1ef7a607d44.jpg" />, in such a way that the device may be effective also in cases where the periodic motion of seawater could be used. The above calculation has been performed by assuming that the concentration of salt in water is sufficient to allow circulation of current in the system. However, as suggested by Wright and Van der Beken [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.8049-ref2">2</xref>], and as calculated by the author [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.8049-ref5">5</xref>], the average salinity of salt water is by far sufficient for current circulation in the system.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Hydrogen Production</title><p>In addition to the power output estimated in the previous section, we may notice that chemical reactions take place at the electrodes of the device in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. In fact, we may state that the current I can be sustained by oxidation of chlorine ions at one electrode (negatively charged), with production of chlorine gas, according to the following reaction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.8049-ref7">7</xref>]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.8049-formula99532"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500266\64dfa074-90b8-49de-bd2b-6ff5840969e2.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>At the same time, reduction of water takes place at the opposite electrode according to the following additional reaction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.8049-ref7">7</xref>]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.8049-formula99533"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500266\7a876aac-d454-4ad1-a76e-ddf09a9d7b85.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The reaction in (8) implies production of sodium hydroxide and hydrogen gas at the positively charged electrode. Therefore, also confiding on the experimental evidence in ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.8049-ref2">2</xref>], we may argue that it is possible to device an e.m.f. generator by letting salt water run in a pipe with average velocity <img src="4-7500266\a3ef283c-086e-498f-a041-3989d38a3961.jpg" /> under an orthogonal magnetic field <img src="4-7500266\761fbeb6-e4be-41be-b2ec-fbc3a7bc78dc.jpg" /> and that, at the same time, it is also possible to produce hydrogen gas by this type of device.</p><p>The question is now the following: “How much hydrogen can be produced when a given amount of salt water flows inside the rectangular pipe in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>?”</p><p>We start by assuming that, because of the reduction and oxidation reaction at the two electrodes, corresponding to the two lateral conducting plates of the device, it is possible to sustain a steady current flow in the system. However, the flow of electrons must be provided by a congruous number of ions moving along the pipe. Let us then also assume that only a fraction of charges in the volume <img src="4-7500266\f3c48912-4593-46e0-a180-e90a549d5c6a.jpg" /> participate to the reductionoxidation processes specified in (7) and (8). When a stationary state sets in, the number of charges participating in the redox reactions must be such that a depletion of electron charges at the negative electrode is counterbalanced by the oxidation of chlorine ions, as seen in (7). Similarly, these charges must be also sufficient, in number, to compensate the excess of electrons at the other electrode by reduction of water as in (8). Contrarily to what assumed in a previous work [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.8049-ref5">5</xref>], this aspect needs to be treated with great care. Indeed, the drift velocities in the y-direction <img src="4-7500266\b8cf3ac4-cd60-4b9d-abe3-b357453aac4c.jpg" /> and <img src="4-7500266\05407b58-697f-4338-b1cb-b689af566235.jpg" /> of the sodium and chlorine ions in salt water, respectively, can be seen to be much less than <img src="4-7500266\5fa3c2cc-5a7a-478b-b2cf-a50c6ec9e83e.jpg" /> in the Appendix. In this way, in the time <img src="4-7500266\46a311ab-08ae-4a7e-bd95-39bf2fdbba6f.jpg" /> only a small fraction of charges of those available in the volume <img src="4-7500266\3de20dae-052d-4c4b-8f2d-f26da0b1e743.jpg" /> may be available for the redox reactions. In fact, if we consider the transverse current density given by (1), we may write<img src="4-7500266\e880dcf7-1dce-4a78-aa08-129fb7ac639a.jpg" />. Therefore, the available current <img src="4-7500266\f391323b-7fa7-462d-afbc-3abcb476c80b.jpg" /> is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.8049-formula99534"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500266\85e98dc6-e219-4e87-87ab-2316f9512854.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<img src="4-7500266\768ea4be-3908-4c42-a276-c73c6a58fd86.jpg" />. As it appears from Equation (9), N is much less than the total number of charged ions flowing in a time <img src="4-7500266\0c5fee10-2e82-4ae2-9b0b-bbeab487a7c0.jpg" /> in the region of length L of the rectangular pipe. We now need to compare the expression of <img src="4-7500266\d68410a0-eb0b-47d8-8bb4-530a4ae7f190.jpg" /> with the maximum current <img src="4-7500266\9af5bb59-e28b-417a-986e-cd753af39e05.jpg" /> circulating in the device when an external load of resistance <img src="4-7500266\70a42076-bd42-40ed-8fa7-d2382c1e6215.jpg" /> is applied to it. Therefore, since<img src="4-7500266\33b97c0f-f4eb-4336-a173-b81c4afd2c1b.jpg" />, we have<img src="4-7500266\4373b4ea-09c0-461b-a526-7f6b41821064.jpg" />, which confirms the possibility of having ionic conduction according to the picture represented in the previous section.</p><p>The number of hydrogen moles <img src="4-7500266\312d1a63-73d9-4f09-803f-cb148d920a9e.jpg" /> produced by the device in one second is then calculated by recognizing that one mole of H<sub>2</sub> is obtained when two moles of electrons are involved in the reactions at the electrons, in such a way that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.8049-formula99535"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500266\533c403c-608d-46e1-9c54-e5daa7b83ee9.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By now setting<img src="4-7500266\4e60bb5e-2c83-403f-a851-f009611ab098.jpg" />, the above expression can be recast in the following form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.8049-formula99536"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500266\27eb3f07-7d9b-4483-908c-4c22ccb1a44d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which gives the rate of hydrogen production in a salt water solution under a constant magnetic field <img src="4-7500266\714c4fb9-59ef-4221-b943-d4e77fdcfae8.jpg" /> when the flux flow rate of the solution is<img src="4-7500266\84e35f68-431c-4b86-bf78-f56237b009e9.jpg" />. Typical values for seawater concentrations at 25˚C can be seen to be</p><p><img src="4-7500266\2177dd32-1110-4033-998b-bd56e3bed48f.jpg" />. Therefore, by taking again<img src="4-7500266\54127984-e524-4068-a238-c594dc4ea8ef.jpg" />, <img src="4-7500266\eb1faa48-5d1d-4d36-82db-2a6f5bcc51b6.jpg" />, <img src="4-7500266\e04a98ca-709d-4157-953d-9c817e4fe212.jpg" />, and<img src="4-7500266\88db64ce-3f36-4213-ba42-deaa54d68736.jpg" />, we have<img src="4-7500266\89a6d87f-a192-4379-a690-6198748f7904.jpg" />.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>In the present work it has been shown that an electromotive force generator can be realized by letting salt water run though a rectangular pipe under the influence of a transverse magnetic field. Because of Lorentz force on the moving sodium and chlorine ions in salt water, one can shown that an equilibrium electric field can be created by the accumulation of charged ions in the vicinities of the lateral conducting plates. By considering the problem in one dimension, it can be shown that the charge distribution varies linearly from one electrode to the other, if the velocity profile of the fluid in the pipe is parabolic [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.8049-ref5">5</xref>]. Furthermore, it can be argued that the electric field across the electrodes can sustain a constant electromotive force<img src="4-7500266\ffe79950-5006-4faa-862f-3a1a1a6e2c8a.jpg" />, which, on its turn, can generate an electric power output.</p><p>The device could be used as an alternative electric power source in situations where salt water is forced to run in large closed ducts, as it happens, for example, in some desalination plants. Experiments on small scale devices carried out by Wright and Van Der Beken [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.8049-ref2">2</xref>] for a pipe with circular section do confirm the existence of a Faraday voltage across the device. In the present paper it is also predicted that, according to properties of ions in aqueous solutions, hydrogen gas can be produced at the positively charged lateral conducting plate. The rate of production of hydrogen gas is however small for not large values of salt water flow rate. Nevertheless, the present analysis can be seen as a starting point for further development of similar applications in the realm of alternative energy devices. In particular, provided experimental validation of the electro-chemical properties of the proposed system, one might envision applications where the increase in the concentration or the flow rate of salt water allows better hydrogen production rates and larger power output.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Acknowledgements</title><p>The author would like to thank A. Fedullo for useful discussions</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Appendix</title><p>We would like to illustrate a simple dynamical model for ions moving in an electrolyte solution in the presence of a transverse magnetic field <img src="4-7500266\312beb9c-f20b-4c5e-825f-e60a32f47652.jpg" /> (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) and a viscous force<img src="4-7500266\b42629e1-4c98-4609-9d59-9eb619b54d73.jpg" />, where <img src="4-7500266\16e1d2ea-8143-417b-b903-b16f2f7928d8.jpg" /> and <img src="4-7500266\aaa3dc75-53ad-4fad-9bf2-b57c30608c76.jpg" /> are the damping coefficient of anions and cations, respectively, and <img src="4-7500266\3aec0f82-22aa-4610-8517-0297a498d39e.jpg" /> is the velocity of the positive (P) and negative (N) ions measured with respect to a reference frame moving with the aqueous solution. By letting the solution move with velocity<img src="4-7500266\3872ece7-f1a1-4892-b6ad-11494b277023.jpg" />, which here we assume as constant for simplicity, the ions, due both to the Lorentz force, expressed as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.8049-formula99537"><label>(A1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500266\fcd82255-918d-4254-8fd0-a338fbe27f17.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and to the viscous force<img src="4-7500266\ffe20254-9941-4066-bb92-182d0a2207cb.jpg" />, move relatively to the solvent, considered to be an incompressible viscous fluid medium.</p><p>By Newton’s law of motion, neglecting gravitation and buoyancy effects, we can therefore write:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.8049-formula99538"><label>(A2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500266\4c485bee-da0f-47f9-a60a-129e6e42475a.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>or</p><disp-formula id="scirp.8049-formula99539"><label>(A3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500266\73df04de-c427-4856-8d1b-3910dc2829f8.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="4-7500266\2d085802-3b95-4c1b-8791-5287588abaed.jpg" /> and <img src="4-7500266\80e137ea-322f-4d1f-847e-fcdd694fd72f.jpg" /> are the mass of the cations and of the ions in the solution, respectively. Notice that the only difference between the above equations of the motions for anions (N) and cations (P) is the sign in the Lorentz force. Therefore, we can first solve, for example, for <img src="4-7500266\b26c267c-dea0-4cf2-bfb7-cacf8debe5ea.jpg" /> and then obtain the solution for <img src="4-7500266\4605418a-ec83-4f14-834c-e9b62b69c8dc.jpg" /> by letting <img src="4-7500266\1e70c597-e4a4-48fd-b873-877c702a635a.jpg" /> and by changing the index of the parameters from P to N. By now expressing all vectors in terms of their components and by carrying out the cross product in (A3), we may write, for cations:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.8049-formula99540"><label>(A5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500266\e24d61a6-a6a7-48f9-8f9b-2d8678c236ba.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.8049-formula99541"><label>(A6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500266\df09977d-a606-4827-a5cc-dccdbc509185.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By simple algebraic manipulations, we can decouple the above system of differential equations, writing</p><disp-formula id="scirp.8049-formula99542"><label>(A7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500266\a587b5bf-a589-4ef5-b001-f661d1c6d184.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.8049-formula99543"><label>(A8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500266\4d60cd98-35ce-41fc-8058-cf806a6e5ed2.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<img src="4-7500266\cd95b233-3de0-4893-a9a8-1bb03f218d88.jpg" />, <img src="4-7500266\a3a7a1bb-800d-4e1d-a205-b568f79ac9dd.jpg" />, and<img src="4-7500266\a947f01c-caab-4c35-a1c8-7a3b5c613def.jpg" />. The stationary solutions of Equations (A7) and (A8) are thus the following:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.8049-formula99544"><label>(A9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500266\b10a5efa-9582-4191-93b5-554790592629.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Therefore, the velocity ratios are:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.8049-formula99545"><label>(A10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="4-7500266\97366adf-d76f-415a-96e7-e809639ca0e3.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Notice that in the case of anions only the second ratio changes sign. It can be finally shown that the ratio <img src="4-7500266\9d092e3d-44d3-4317-83d0-3b1ac057db62.jpg" /> is of the order 10<sup>–</sup><sup>7</sup> for seawater, in such a way that<img src="4-7500266\8c5b49f5-ce17-4a32-9755-45e0d717f255.jpg" />, and<img src="4-7500266\3f1fe3ed-ae7a-4de1-84fe-2e6ee450521c.jpg" />.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.8049-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. Kittel, “Introduction to Solid State Physics,” John Whiley, New York, 1959.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.8049-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. J. Wright and S. Van Der Beken, “The Hall Effect in a Flowing Electrolyte,” American Journal of Physics, Vol. 40, No. 2, February 1972, pp. 245-247.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.8049-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. S. T. Driver, “Comment on the Hall Effect in a Flowing Electrolyte,” American Journal of Physics, Vol. 46, No. 12, December 1978, pp. 1275-1276.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.8049-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. B. Geselowitz, “Comment on the Hall Effect in a Flowing Electrolyte,” American Journal of Physics, Vol. 40, No. 8, August 1972, pp. 1183-1184.  
doi:10.1119/1.1986792</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.8049-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. De Luca, “Lorentz Force on Sodium and Chlorine Ions in a Salt Water Solution Flow under a Transverse Magnetic Field,” European Journal of Physics, Vol. 30, No. 3, May 2009, pp. 459-466.  
doi:10.1088/0143-0807/30/3/004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.8049-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">H. Yamaguchi, X.-R. Zhang, S. Higashi and M. Li, “Study on Power Generation Using Electro-Conductive Polymer and Its Mixture with Magnetic Fluid,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Vol. 320, No. 7, 2008, pp. 1406-1411. doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2007.12.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.8049-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. Mazzoldi, M. Nigro and C. Voci, “Fisica,” EdiSES, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>