<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Agricultural Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2156-8553</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/as.2017.811092</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AS-80375</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Fruit Market in the City of Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil from 2004 to 2017
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>José</surname><given-names>Clélio de Andrade</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lair</surname><given-names>Victor Pereira</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ângelo</surname><given-names>Albérico Alvarenga</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ester</surname><given-names>Alice Ferreira</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Paulo</surname><given-names>Márcio Norberto</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Marcelo</surname><given-names>Ribeiro Malta</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Searchers for the Agricultural Research Company of Minas Gerais, EPAMIG, Lavras, Brazil</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>09</day><month>11</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>1278</fpage><lpage>1282</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>10,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>14,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2017</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>17,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Fruit growing has achieved advances through the use of new technologies generated by research. In Brazil, it is one of the most prominent sectors in agribusiness, achieving significant results and generating business opportunities. In this way, the fruit market has grown considerably in the last decades, both in quantity and in quality. Allied to this, the changes in consumer behavior regarding food consumption have been responsible for the increase of the fruit market. The objective of this work was to know the evolution of the fruit trade in the city of Lavras, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, in relation to the quantity sold, monetary value, losses in the gondolas of retail establishments and per capita consumption of the population of this city.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Market</kwd><kwd> Fruits</kwd><kwd> Consumption</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>One of the most important sectors in the world agribusiness is fruit growing, which includes a large number of fruit trees. Brazil with a great territorial extension, allied to the climatic diversity, allows the production of the most diverse fruits, generating great opportunities for the agribusiness. Taking advantage of this advantage, the country produced 38.36 million tons of fruit in 2013, placing it in the 3rd place in the world ranking, surpassed only by China and India, which produced 137.6 and 71.07 million tons of fruit, in that same period [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80375-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>Fruit farming, besides having economic importance, generates a great number of jobs, distributing wealth in all layers of society. According to the IBRAF [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80375-ref2">2</xref>] , fruit growing in Brazil occupied an area of 2.2 million hectares, moved US$ 5.29 billion and employed 5.6 million people, representing 27% of the agricultural labor force from the country.</p><p>The fruit market has grown considerably in the last decades, both in quantity and in quality. This was possible because of advances in research and development in the industry. In four decades, Brazil has passed from importer to exporter of some temperate fruits, such as apple. In the 1970s, the national production of this fruit represented only 10% of domestic consumption. Today, there are more than 36,000 hectares producing high quality apples, enough to meet the domestic market and even for export [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80375-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80375-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>The changes in consumer behavior, with regard to food consumption, have been responsible for the increase in the fruit market [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80375-ref5">5</xref>] . Faced with this trend, the Center for Advanced Studies in Applied Economics, University of S&#227;o Paulo (CEPEA-USP), conducted a survey on fruit consumption in Brazil, which showed an average increase of approximately 4.38 kg per person per year, from 2005 to 2011 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80375-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>The objective of this work was to know the fruit market of the city of Lavras, MG, Brazil, from 2004 to 2017, in relation to the volume sold, monetary value, percentage of losses in gondolas and per capita consumption of fruits of the population.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methodology</title><p>This research was carried out in three stages in the city of Lavras, MG, Brazil, the first one in the months of August to January of 2004/2005; the second in the months of August to January 2011/2012, and the third in the months of August to January 2016/2017, in the various supermarket chains, sweatshops and free markets.</p><p>The data collection was performed monthly, through a spreadsheet with questions about quantity marketed, total value of consumer prices and percentage of losses in gondolas. The data collected were tabulated and analyzed monthly.</p><p>The sampling of the number of establishments interviewed was carried out according to the criteria of Cochran [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80375-ref7">7</xref>] , in which locality with more than fifty commercial establishments of fruit the sample is of 10%, of ten to forty of 20% and with less than ten of 100%. For this research carried out in the city of Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil, the sample was 100% of the four networks of supermarket establishments and ten retail establishments.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>According to the data presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, it can be seen that, in the first stage (2004/2005), an average of 377.6 t of fruits per month was traded, moving around US$ 18,850,798, with a price average of US$ 0.50 per kg of fruit.</p><p>In the second phase (2011/2012), there were 650.8 t of fruits per month, moving US$ 396.808.30 monthly, with an average price of US$ 0.61 per kilo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80375-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>Finally, in the third stage, this average rose to 786.3 t monthly, moving US$ 60,995,207 per month at an average price of US$ 0.79 per kg of fruit. In a</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Quantity (t) and value (US$) of the fruit marketed in Lavras from August to January 2004/2005, 2011/2012 and 2016/2017</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Month/ Stages</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Stages</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2004/2005</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2011/2012</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2016/2017</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Amount (t)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >value (US$1,000.00)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Amount (t)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >value (US$ 1,000.00)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Amount (t)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >value (US$ 1,000.00)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >August</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >385.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >185.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >642.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >402.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >783.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >605.61</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >September</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >383.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >188.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >634.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >391.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >822.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >635.53</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >October</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >350.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >169.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >589.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >365.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >851.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >658.19</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >November</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >355.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >193.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >591.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >366.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >798.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >617.29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >December</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >401.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >199.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >667.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >443.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >874.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >675.74</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >January</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >389.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >197.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >644.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >412.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >824.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >637.54</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >377.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >189.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >650.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >396.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >825.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >638.32</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*Dollar quotation on September 20, 2017 (US$ 1.00 = R$ 3.13).</p><p>study conducted by Andrade et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80375-ref8">8</xref>] in the period of 2014/2015, similar results were observed.</p><p>According to the data presented, evolution of 72.35% from the first to the second stage and 108.23% from the first to the third stage is observed, clearly showing the trend of increase in fruit consumption by the population, mainly motivated health aspects and the search for a better quality of life.</p><p>In six years, from the first to the second stage, per capita fruit consumption in Lavras rose from 47.76 kg/inhabitant/year to 58.90 kg/inhabitant/year [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80375-ref3">3</xref>] . In that interval, consumption per capita had an increase of 11.14 kg per person per year, which was more than double the average in Brazil, where there was an increase of 4.38 kg per person per year [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80375-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>Comparing the evolution from the first one (2004/2005) to the third stage (2016/2017), per capita consumption increased from 47.76 kg/inhabitant/year [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80375-ref4">4</xref>] to 78.63 kg/inhabitant/year, representing an increase of 30.87 kg/hab/year, a 64.63% increase in per capita consumption.</p><p>The per capita consumption in 2010 in Brazil was 57.00 kg/hab/year, in Italy, 114.00 and in Spain, 120.00 kg/hab/year, according to FAO [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80375-ref1">1</xref>] . In Lavras, although per capita consumption is above the national average, it is still below that in Italy and Spain [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80375-ref3">3</xref>] . This fact can be explained by the increase in the supply of fruit in the retail market, as a consequence of the increase in the demand for the population, due to the behavioral changes of the population that started to look for healthier foods, together with an improvement of the purchasing power of the society in general, as well as the improvement of the supply and distribution of these products by the retail network with assiduity and punctuality.</p><p>The losses of the fruits in the supermarket shelves and bakeries went from 7.8% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80375-ref3">3</xref>] , in the first stage, to 4.6% in the third stage, as reported by those responsible for the hortifr&#250;ti section of the establishments surveyed. There was a</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Most traded fruit (t) in Lavras, MG, from August 2016 to January 2017</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fruits/month</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ago/16</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Set/16</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Out/16</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Nov/16</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Dez/16</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Jan/17</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Average</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Banana Prata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >109.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >109.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >104.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102.29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Banana Nanica</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Orange P&#234;ra</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >109.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >121.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >107.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >104.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108.68</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >National apple</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Papaya Formosa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Papaya Amazonas</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pineapple P&#233;rola</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Grape Rosada</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mango Palmer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sub-total*<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >326.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >349.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >375.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >354.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >432.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >395.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >358.22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Others</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >456.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >472.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >475.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >433.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >441.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >428.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >467.38</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >783.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >822.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >851.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >798.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >874.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >824.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >825.60</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*Subtotal for banana, orange, apple, papaya and pineapple.</p><p>reduction in losses from 64.24 to 40.48 t/month, that is, 23.76 t/month less, representing a saving in waste of US$ 18,294.40 per month. This is due to the efforts made by the management of Ceasa Minas in the logistics of distribution to the final consumer.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> shows the data of the main fruits commercialized in the city of Lavras, MG, in the third stage of this research, from August 2016 to January 2017. The banana was the most commercialized fruit, with a monthly average of 139.42 t, of which the cultivar Prata contributes with 102.29 t, the “Nanica”, with 37.13 t. The second most traded fruit was the “P&#234;ra” orange, with a monthly average of 108.68 t, followed by the national apple, with 49.24 t, and papaya with 39.65 t, with 20.70 t of papaya “Formosa”, and 18.95 t of the “Amazonas” papaya. In December 2016, the “Rosada” grape was the 5th placed with 37.74 t and in January 2017 this position was occupied by the “Palmer” mango, with 35.72 t.</p><p>In the three steps studied, it is verified that the month of December was the month of greatest fruit supply in the city of Lavras. It can be said that this event is due to the greater supply of fruit, accompanied by the greater demand for the population, a factor motivated by the Christmas festivities and also by the increase of income, with the receipt of the 13<sup>th</sup> salary.</p><p>As for the increase in the volume of fruit traded, it can be said that it is a consequence of the increase of productivity and quality, as well as the constant supply of these products during all months of the year. This offer, in turn, is provided by the technological development coming from the results of continuous scientific research, which has made possible the advancement of fruit growing in the various geographic regions of Brazil.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>The commercialization, consumption and supply of fruit with quality, attendance and punctuality in Lavras have increased.</p><p>Losses in facilities have decreased as a result of more efficient distribution logistics.</p><p>Technological development has provided better quality fruit during all months of the year, favoring increased consumption, which has also been driven by the change in consumer habits.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>de Andrade, J.C., Pereira, L.V., Alvarenga, &#194;.A., Ferreira, E.A., Norberto, P.M. and Malta, M.R. (2017) Fruit Market in the City of Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil from 2004 to 2017. Agricultural Sciences, 8, 1278-1282. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2017.811092</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.80375-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">(2015) AGRONEGóCIO: Fruticultura: Boletim de Inteligência.  
http://www.bibliotecas.sebrae.com.br/chronus/ARQUIVOS_CHRONUS/bds/bds.nsf/ 
64ab878c176e5103877bfd3f92a2a68f/$File/5791.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80375-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Andrade, J.C., Pereira, L.V., Abrahao, E., Alvarenga, A.A. and Malta, M.R. (2012) Mercado de frutas em Lavras—MG. EPAMIG-CTSM, Lavras, 3 p. (EPAMIG-CTSM. Circular Técnica, 149).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80375-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Andrade, J.C., Pereira, L.V., Alvarenga, A.A., Malta, M.R. and Mendes, J.M.C. (2012) Performance do comercio de frutas em Lavras—MG, nos períodos de 2004/2005 a 2011/2012. In: Congresso Brasileiro de Fruticultura, Sociedade Brasileira de Fruticultura, Bento Goncalves, 2606-2610.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80375-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cochran, W.G. (1965) The Planning of Observational Studies of Human Populations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (General), 128, 234-266.  
https://doi.org/10.2307/2344179</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80375-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Instituto Brasileiro de Frutas—IBRAF (2010) Producao Brasileira de Frutas, 2009.  
http://www.ibraf.org.br/estatisticas/ProducaoBrasileira de Frutas 2009-Final.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80375-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pimentel, P.M. and Pimentel, L.P. (2011) Tendências do mercado de frutas de uso imediato. Embrapa Clima Temperado, Pelotas.  
http://www.ceinfo.cnpct.embrapa/artigo_contexto.plep?op=l&amp;</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80375-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Silveira, J., Galeskas, H., Tapetti, R. and Lourencini, I. (2011) Quem é o consumidor brasileiro de frutas e hortalicas? Hortifruti Brasil, Piracicaba, 103, 8-23.  
http://www.hfbrasil.org.br/br/revista/acessar/quem-e-o-consumidor-brasileiro-de-frutas-e-hortalicas.aspx</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80375-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Andrade, J.C., Pereira, L.V., Alvarenga, A.A., Ferreira, E.A. and Norberto, P.M. (2017) Evolution of the Fruit Market in the City of Lavras—Minas Gerais—Brazil. International Journal of Environmental &amp; Agriculture Research, 3, 32-36.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>