<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">GEP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4336</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/gep.2017.511010</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">GEP-80356</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Typical Hydraulic Properties of Deep Aquifers of Niger Delta from Pumping Test Data
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>S.</surname><given-names>A. Ngah</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>C.</surname><given-names>L. Eze</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Institute of Geosciences and Space Technology, Rivers State University, Port Harcourt, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>ngahsab@yahoo.com(SAN)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>02</day><month>11</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>139</fpage><lpage>148</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>28,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>13,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2017</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>16,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The hydraulic properties of deeper Coastal Plain Sands, which form the main aquifer in the Niger Delta, were investigated around Eleme, Rivers State. The intent was to find out if frequent well failure was as a result of the aquifer not having enough transmitting capacity to sustain the huge withdrawal necessary for Eleme and its environs where demand for groundwater withdrawal is very high because Eleme axis serves as a major industrial axis of River State or whether the frequent well failure was due to inefficient well construction practice. Constant discharge pumping tests were conducted in 8 deep borehole (250 - 310 m). Data generated during the test were analysed using Cooper-Jacob’s straight line method. The calculated transmissivity of the aquifers ranged from 1324 m
  <sup>2</sup>/day - 5815 m
  <sup>2</sup>/day. These values when compared with transmissivity values elsewhere indicate that the aquifers in the study area have excellent water yielding properties, plotting within the range of “Very Good” in water transmitting capacity scale. Coefficient of permeability ranged from 13.65 m/d - 59.9 m/d. Coefficient of Storage ranged from 28.2 &#215; 10
  <sup>-5</sup> - 29.1 &#215; 10
  <sup>-5</sup> while the Specific capacities of the wells ranged from 48.75 3 - 78.13 m
  <sup>3</sup>/d/m. It is concluded that the deep aquifers of the Niger Delta do possess the capacity to produce and sustain large groundwater withdrawal. It is further recommended that competent drilling contractors be engaged in deep well construction in the area.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Deep Aquifers. Hydraulic Properties</kwd><kwd> Coastal Plain Sands</kwd><kwd> Eleme</kwd><kwd> Niger Delta</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Water as a finite resource is becoming very scarce in most nations of the world. The competition for the available supplies among users such as the residential, agriculture, and industries will continue to put great stress on water supply especially in arid and semi-arid areas where water shortage could constitute an important constraining economic factor. Besides, high rate of urbanization and rapidly increasing population are also known to have contributed to water stress even in non-arid areas.</p><p>This ever increasing demand for water is more pronounced in areas with high concentration of industries like Eleme, Rivers State, a semi-urban community and plays host to such companies as Eleme Refinery, Eleme Petrochemicals Company, Onne Oil and Gas Free Zone, Federal Light Terminal, Onne, Nigerian Ports Authority, Naval College etc. The existence of these companies and ancillary outfits has resulted in very large influx of people who now live and work at Eleme. Water supply projections became grossly inadequate. Surface water sources are either saline or polluted by long history of oil and gas activities. Groundwater becomes the viable option for domestic and industrial water supplies. Residents therefore resort to indiscriminate sinking of shallow water boreholes and hand dug wells for their domestic water needs. These boreholes were completed into the Coastal Plain Sands which is the surface outcrop of the Benin Formation often covered by superficial Alluvial deposits.</p><p>In response to the increased water demand, a series of water supply projects based on groundwater had been embarked upon by both public and private sectors. These interventions were largely unplanned, uncoordinated and guided by no hydrogeological studies whatsoever. The drilling itself was done by people who have no skills or training relevant to it and as a result, no hydrogeological records were kept, and no analysis was carried out. Most of the boreholes therefore became abortive and huge sums of money spent on their construction went down the drains. The bigger companies that can afford the budget, now have their boreholes drilled into deeper aquifers for fear of imminent regional groundwater level decline which might adversely affect their production. The costs of such deep wells are usually very high.</p><p>Previous studies on this subject concentrated on the hydraulic characteristics of first aquifer as the technology for deep well drilling was not very affordable then [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80356-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80356-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80356-ref3">3</xref>] . In this work, the water-yielding properties of deep aquifers which are the target of the deep wells are evaluated not only to fill the knowledge gap but also to reduce the financial loss involved in constructing abortive deep boreholes that result from lack of knowledge of water yielding potentials of the aquifers at various depths. It will also enhance the success rate in borehole drilling if more competent drilling contractors are engaged hence result in improved water supply in this economically strategic area of the country.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Geology and Geomorphology of the Study Area</title><p>The geology of the area is typical of the geology of the Niger Delta. The Niger Delta itself (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) and has been described by previous workers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80356-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80356-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80356-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80356-ref7">7</xref>] as well as records of exploration activities of the oil and gas companies in Nigeria.</p><p>However, the modern Niger Delta was formed during the third and last depositional cycle of the southern Nigerian basin which started in the Paleocene. The Niger Delta sedimentary sequence had been divided into the oldest Akata Formation (Paleocene), Agbada Formation (Eocene) and the Youngest Benin Formation (Miocene to Recent) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80356-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>The major aquiferous formation is the Benin Formation which is about 2100 m thick at the centre of the basin and consists of coarse-medium grained sandstones, thick shales and gravels. The upper section of the Benin Formation is the quaternary deposits which is about 40 - 150 m thick and comprises sand and silt/clay with the later becoming increasingly more prominent seawards [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80356-ref3">3</xref>] . The formation consists of predominantly freshwater continental friable sands and gravel that have excellent water-yielding properties with occasional intercalations of claystone/shales The Benin Formation is highly permeable and prolific and is the target of most water boreholes in the Niger Delta. Five [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80356-ref5">5</xref>] major geomorphologic units have been identified in the Niger Delta [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80356-ref8">8</xref>] : the coastal plain sands (dry flatland and plain), the Sombreiro-Warri Deltaic plain (with abundant freshwater swamps), the freshwater swamps (backswamps, alluvial plain and meander belts), the saltwater or mangrove swamps and the active/abandoned coastal beaches (sand bars, beaches and bars).</p><p>Water table is shallow in most parts of the area, fluctuating between near surface and 18m. Influent conditions may occur in some places in the dry season between water levels in the rivers and the shallow aquifers. The groundwater level usually drops below the river water level, creating a head differential which induces flow of river waters into the aquifers. The rivers, therefore, partly recharge the upper aquifers and may pollute them with dissolved toxic or hazardous materials [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80356-ref9">9</xref>] . The quaternary deposits obtain steady recharge by direct precipitation. The main body of groundwater in the Niger Delta is contained in the very thick and extensive sand and gravel aquifers. Three main zones have been differentiated. These are: a northern bordering zone consisting of shallow aquifers of predominantly continental materials and a coastal zone of intermixing marine and continental deposits [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80356-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80356-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80356-ref10">10</xref>] . The aquifers in the study area are more continental in character, being composed of river loads coming from the hinter lands. They are encountered at very shallow depths that shallow boreholes can be completed even at less than 20 m using manual drilling methods.</p><p>Rainfall is high in the area (mean, 300 mm/yr). Evapotranspiration and Relative Humidity are high and remain high all the year round. This is due, mainly, to the coastal nature of the area. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows typical response of groundwater level to monthly rainfall distribution for Eleme-Okochiri area behind the Port Harcourt Refinery Company.</p><p>Moderately high temperature (24˚C - 34.5˚C) and long periods of sunshine prevail in the dry season. Human beings perspire profusely under the intense heat of the sun necessitating frequent desire for water to remain hydrated. The relief is generally low with average elevation between 20 m and 30 m above sea level [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80356-ref11">11</xref>] (2015) and gently sloping seaward. The vegetation in the area includes raffia palms, secondary regrowth complexes and thick rain forest. The soil is usually sandy or sandy loam underlain by a layer impervious pan and is always leached due to the heavy rainfall. Overland flow is high due to continuous heavy rainfall and built-up nature of the area resulting in severe annual flooding.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Materials and Method</title><p>1) Instrumentation</p><p>The following instruments were used in carrying out the pumping test: a 75HP Grundfos submersible pump equipped with starter panel, cable, and risers. The pump was installed and pulled out using a Gardner Denver 1500 HD drilling rig. Power supply for the test was provided by a 150 KVA Perkins generator. The yield was read out on a calibrated flow meter installed on the flow line equipped with both butterfly and non-return valves. Water level changes during</p><p>pumping and recovery were measured using an electronic dip meter while time was measured using stopwatch. All readings were recorded in a field note book and later analysed using the computer.</p><p>2) Principles of Pumping Tests</p><p>The principle of pumping tests is fairly simple. When a submersible pump installed in a borehole is energized, a significant elevation difference is created between the water level in the well and the water level in the aquifer surrounding the borehole. This difference in head forces the water in the aquifer to flow towards the well. The pumping causes a dewatering of the aquifer (unconfined aquifer) or reduction of confining pressure (confined aquifer) and hence creates a cone of depression on the water table. The dewatering of aquifer or reduction in confining pressure both result in the flow of water out of the well leading generally to water level decline in the pumped well and nearby observation well. Measuring this water level decline at specific time intervals is what aquifer tests seek to achieve. The measured values of piezometric head or water table decline are compared with mathematical solutions and the transmissivity, T; hydraulic conductivity, K; the coefficient of storage, S; and the specific capacity of the well can be calculated. Armed with knowledge of the above parameters, groundwater withdrawal can be effectively planned such that no undesirable consequences are induced.</p><p>Pumping tests are expensive to conduct and as such are not commonly included in most borehole drilling contracts in the Niger Delta. A generalized cost of pumping test can be determined by the following relationship modified after [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80356-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><p>Costofpumpingtest ( USD ) = 136 &#215; hours 0.66 &#215; 300 (1)</p><p>The model emphasized the relationship between cost and duration of pumping.</p><p>3) Data collation and Analysis</p><p>The results of the pumping tests carried out in eight deep boreholes at Eleme Petrochemicals Complex are analysed based on Jacob’s (1964) straight line, semi log method, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80356-ref13">13</xref>] (a modification of Theis (1935) equation), [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80356-ref14">14</xref>] which expresses transmissivity, T, as</p><p>T = 0.183 Q Δ s (2)</p><p>where ∆s = drawdown per log cycle of time = slope of time vs drawdown plot on semi-log table, T = transmissivity of the aquifer m<sup>2</sup>/d and Q = discharge of the well (m<sup>3</sup>/d).</p><p>Each data set was plotted with the drawdown (m) values regressed on time (minutes since pumping started), using MICROSOFT EXCEL. The slope of the time vs drawdown graph gives a value for ∆s, in Jacob’s equation. With a known discharge rate, Q, T can be calculated simply by substituting into the equation. The slope of the straight line is ∆s, the drawdown per log cycle of time and can be obtained as a vertical projection of the straight line between two numbers on the time axis that are logarithm one unit apart. Water level decline is usually very rapid as soon as the pump is started due to rapid depletion of “well bore” or casing storage [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80356-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80356-ref16">16</xref>] . Therefore early pumping test data will not fit into Jacob’s modification of the non-equilibrium formula as the Δs will be higher during the time required to exhaust the casing storage giving erroneously low T value in the early stages of the test. To compensate for this, a regressed line of best fit is generated and the slope used to calculate the representative T value.</p><p>Using the resulting regression equation,</p><p>y 1 = m ( ln x ) + C (3)</p><p>y 2 = m ( ln x ) + C (4)</p><p>By definition, the slope per log cycle of time means</p><p>y 2 − y 1 = Δ s (5)</p><p>The slope of the drawdown vs time plot was calculated for each of the wells using the above procedure. The values for each well pumped-tested was substituted into relevant equation and the relevant hydraulic parameters calculated.</p><p>With Δs known, the hydraulic parameters of the aquifer were calculated as follows:</p><p>a) Transmissivity</p><p>T, a measure of the ease with which an aquifer allows water to pass through its pore spaces in response to pumping or drainage forces was calculated using the equation</p><p>T = 0.183 Q Δ s</p><p>b) Coefficient of permeability/hydraulic conductivity, k</p><p>This is the constant of proportionality in Darcy’s law. It is the property of a water bearing formation that relates to its conduit function. When the saturated thickness of the aquifer is known, k can be calculated from the relation</p><p>T = K b (6)</p><p>where, K = hydraulic conductivity (m/day), b = the saturated thickness of the aquifer (m) and T = transmissivity (m<sup>2</sup>/day)</p><p>c) Coefficient of storage, S</p><p>Since the coefficient of storage varies directly with aquifer thickness, b, it can be estimated from known values of b, using the following relationship, Todd (1980)</p><p>S = 3 &#215; 10 − 6 b (7)</p><p>d) Specific capacity</p><p>The specific capacity of a well is its yield per unit drawdown, usually expressed in m<sup>3</sup>/hr/m of drawdown. It decreases in direct proportion with drawdown. Its maximum corresponds to zero drawdown while the minimum occurs when the drawdown and yield are at the maximum.</p><p>Specificcapacity = Q / s (8)</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results and Discussions</title><p>Figures 3-6 are representative time-drawdown graphs for borehole 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7 respectively. The hydraulic parameters calculated for each of the wells are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. The table also shows the total depth of the boreholes. These values are in general agreement with earlier estimates of hydraulic parameters for shallower boreholes in the Niger Delta [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80356-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80356-ref18">18</xref>] .</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Values of hydraulic parameters calculated for the aquifers in the study area</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >S/No</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Location</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >BH#</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Depth</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Transmissivity, T</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >k (m/day)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >S</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Specific Capacity m<sup>3</sup>/hr/m</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >m<sup>2</sup>/day</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >m<sup>2</sup>/sec</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eleme Petrochemical</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >310</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3772.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.6 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.1 &#215; 10<sup>−5</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.73</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eleme Petrochemical</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >310</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.1 &#215; 10<sup>−5</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eleme Petrochemical</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >226</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5676</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.6 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.2 &#215; 10<sup>−5</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eleme Petrochemical</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >310</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6357.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.5 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.1 &#215; 10<sup>−5</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eleme Petrochemical</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >230</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5961.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.2 &#215; 10<sup>−5</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.55</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eleme Petrochemical</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >230</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3096</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.8 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.2 &#215; 10<sup>−5</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.92</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The calculated values of T in this study were also compared with Kampsax-Kruger (1985) classification for aquifers in the Niger Delta [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80356-ref19">19</xref>] shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><p>From the table above, the aquifers underlying Eleme Petrochemical Complex have “Very Good” water transmitting capability. The calculated transmissivity values were also compared with Krasny (1993) classification [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80356-ref20">20</xref>] (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><p>Based on this classification, the transmisivity of the aquifers falls within “very high” (II) implying that the aquifers can sustain regional and great regional withdrawls. Therefore, the deep aquifers underlying Eleme Petrochemicals complex can sustain withdrawal of great regional importance.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Kampsax-Kruger’s rating of T values [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80356-ref19">19</xref>] </title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Transmissivity Range (m<sup>2</sup>/sec)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Water Transmitting Capacity</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T &lt; 1 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Poor</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup> &lt; T &lt; 5 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Medium</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup> &lt; T &lt; 1 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 &#215; 10<sup>−2</sup> &lt; T</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Very Good</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Krasny classification of transmissivity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80356-ref20">20</xref>] </title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Coefficient of Transmissivity (m<sup>2</sup>/day)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Class of Transmissivity magnitude</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Designation of Transmissivity magnitude</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Groundwater supply Potential</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >I</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Very high</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Withdrawals of great regional importance.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >II</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >High</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Withdrawals of lesser regional importance.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >III</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Intermediate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Withdrawals for local water Supply (small communities, Plants, etc.)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >IV</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Withdrawals for local water Supply (private consumption)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >V</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Very Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Withdrawals for local water Supply with limited consumption.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >VI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Imperceptible</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sources for local water Supply are difficult (if possible) to ensure.</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Pumping test results show that the Coastal Plain sands have excellent water yielding properties even at great depths. The problem of frequent borehole failure and large records of abortive boreholes in the area cannot be blamed on the inability of the aquifer to yield enough water. This observation clearly puts the blame on the competence of the drilling contractors. To improve on the success rate particularly in deep boreholes, efforts should be made to engage suitably qualified and equipped water well drilling contractors for borehole drilling, installation and development projects.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Ngah, S.A. and Eze, C.L. (2017) Typical Hydraulic Properties of Deep Aquifers of Niger Delta from Pumping Test Data. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 5, 139-148. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2017.511010</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.80356-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Etu-Effeotor, J.O. and Odigi, M.I. (1983) Water Supply Problems in the Eastern Niger, Delta. Jl. Nigerian Min. Geosci. Assoc., 20, 183-192.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80356-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Amajor, L.C. (1991) Aquifers in the Benin Formation (Miocene-Recent) Eastern Niger Delta, Nigeria: Lithostraigraphy, Hydraulics and Water Quality. Environmental Geology and Water Sciences, 17, 85-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01701565</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80356-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Etu-Efeotor, J.O. and Akpokodje, E.G. (1990) Aquifer Systems of the Niger Delta. Nig. J. Min. Geol., 26, 279-285.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80356-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Reyment, R.A. (1965) Aspects of the Geology of Nigeria. Ibadan Univ. Press, Ibadan 145 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80356-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Short, K.C. and Stauble, A.J. (1967) Outline of the Geology of the Niger Delta. Bulletin of AAPG, 51, 761-779.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80356-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Murat, R.C. (1972) Stratigraphy and Paleogeography of the Cretaceous and Lower Tertiary in Southern Nigeria. In: Dessauvagie, T.F.J. and Whiteman, A.J., Eds., African Geology, Univ. Ibadan, Ibadan, 251-266.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80356-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oomkens, E. (1974) Lithofacies Relations in the Late Quateernary Niger Delta Complex. Sedimentology, 21, 195-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.1974.tb02056.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80356-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Akpokodje, E.G. (1987) The Engineering Geological Characteristics and Classification of the Major Superficial Soils of the Niger Delta. Engineering Geology, 23, 193-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(87)90090-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80356-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ngah, S.A. (1990) Groundwater Resource Development in the Niger Delta: Problems and Prospects. Proceedings of 8th International IAEG Congress, Balkema, Rotterdam, 1379-1386.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80356-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wokocha, C.C and Omenihu, E.R. (2015) Land Resources Appraisal and Management Activities using Remote Sensing Techniques: Case Study of Akpor Town, Rivers State. Research Journal of Environment and Earth Science, 5, 145-152.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80356-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anon, G.E. (1977) Groundwater Manual: A Water Resources Technical Publication. U.S. Dept of the Interior Bureau for Reclamation, Washington DC, 97 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80356-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cooper Jr., H.H. and Jacob, C.E. (1964) A Generalized Graphical Method for Evaluating Formation Constants and Summarizing Well Field History. Transactions on American Geophysical Union, 27, No. 4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80356-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Theis, C.V. (1935) The Relation between the Lowering of the Piezometic Surface and the Rate and Duration of Discharge of a Well Using Groundwater Storage. Transactions on American Geophysical Union, Washington DC, 518-524.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80356-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schafer, D.C. (1978) Casing Storage Can Affect Pumping Test Data. Johnson Driller’s Journal, Jan/Feb. Johnson Div. UOP Inc, St. Pauls, MN.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80356-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kruseman, G.P. and de Ridder, J.M. (1990) Analysis and Evaluation of Pumping Test Data. ILRI Publication 47, 377 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80356-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Todd, D.K. (1980) Groundwater Hydrology. John Willey and Sons Inc, New York, 336 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80356-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Allen, R.O. (1992) Iron and Chloride Groundwater Contaminants in Rivers State: Geographic and Stratigraphic Distribution and Genesis. Unpublished M.Sc Thesis. University of Port Harcourt, 137 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80356-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Etu-Efeotor</surname><given-names> J.O. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2000</year>)<article-title>Hydraulic Characteristics of the Aquifers within the Oligocene-Recent Coastal Plain Sands Parts of Southern Nigeria</article-title><source> Global Jl Pure and Applied Sciences</source><volume> 6</volume>,<fpage> 107</fpage>-<lpage>115</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80356-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kampsax-Kruger (1985) Final Report on Hydrogeological Site Studies for Water Well Development NAFCON Phase I. Study Report Submitted to Federal Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Abuja, 118 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80356-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Krasny, J. (1993) Classification of Transmissivity Magnitude and Variation. Groundwater, 31, 230-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1993.tb01815.x</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>