Urethral stricture is a permanent reduction of the lumen of urethra, or even the complete obliteration of its canal, which reduces the urinary flow from the bladder to the exterior whatever the level and the etiology of the stricture. Anterior and posterior urethra’s strictures are distinguished. The anterior part of urethra goes from the end of the membranous portion to the urethral meatus. It can be subdivided into bulbar and penile urethra. The symptomatology of urethral stricture is univocal and represented by dysuria or urinary bladder retention. Infectious aetiologies are decreasing in developed countries compared to traumatic and iatrogenic aetiologies [1] . This does not seem to be the case in our context, despite the lack of epidemiological studies. We have conducted a retrospective study in order to highlight the management of the anterior urethra stricture at Ouagadougou university teaching hospital.

It was a retrospective and descriptive study in the urology division of Yalgado Ouedraogo University Teaching Hospital from October 2009 to September 2014. This study included all patients with anterior urethra stricture only confirmed by retrograde urethrography/voiding cystouretrography (VCUG) or during the surgery with a complete medical record. The patients who have not complete medical records and VCUG were excluded to this study. Epidemiological, clinical and managements parameters are studied.

During the study period, the hospital prevalence of the anterior urethral stricture was 4.2% in the department. Retrospective study by Guiriansoro Z [2] reported a hospital prevalence similar to 3.5% of urethral stricture. However, Mattiche H [3] and Fall et al. [4] reported some prevalence higher than ours, respectively 7% and 6.5%. From this diversity of prevalence we can notice that the stricture of the anterior urethra was one of the causes of hospitalization in urology departments.

In Europe, Lumen N et al. [5] and Palminteri et al. [6] reported higher rates of anterior urethral stricture respectively 60.9% and 77.4%. The stricture of the anterior urethra as well as the urethral stricture in general is a pathology of young adult. The mean age in our study was similar to 50.5 years. The slices of 41 - 60 years (33.3%) and 21 - 40 years (30.1%) were the more affected groups. The average age of our patients was similar to those of Zango B et al. [7] and Guirassy et al. [8] who reported respectively an average age of 47.8 and 51.4 years. Heyns et al. [9] in a comparative study also reported averages of 49.9 and 50.9 years. These results confirm the fact that urethral stricture is an affection of the young adult especially in sub-Saharan Africa where the sexual transmitted infections and urethritis are frequent in young people. The high average age in developed countries could be related to a high frequency of endourology therapies at these ages.

In our study, dysuria and acute urinary retention were the most frequent reasons for consultation with respectively 66.7% and 33.3% of cases. In the literature, the first reason for consultation of the urethral stricture was dysuria [5] [6] . Other patients consulted for the first time at the complications stage. Guirassy et al. [8] , Fall B et al. [4] reported low rates compared to ours respectively 32.4%; and 42.2%. In Zango et al. [7] study, from the 70 patients, 46 (65.7%) were seen with complications including 34 acute urinary retention, 7 penoscrotal fistulas and 5 genital cellulitis. In Gabon, Falandry [10] reported 29.8% fistulas from urethral strictures and 50% of upper urinary tract complications.

Urinary tract infections were the medical history developed by the majority of patients, around 66.6% of cases. Infections were followed by traumatic urethral catheterism which accounted for 14.2% of the medical history. Mattiche H [3] reported a 50% history of urethritis. These outcomes highlighted the risk for patients with a history of urethritis to develop an anterior urethra stricture. Less than half of the patients had physical signs. The distended bladder was the most frequent sign. In our study, 10 patients of the 63 had a distended bladder 15.8%. Mattiche H [3] reported distended bladder percentages with 37% of patients. These results allow us to remember that the physical examination of patients with anterior urethral stricture is poor.

Bulbar localization was the most frequent in our study. We found 29 cases (46.4%) of bulbar strictures, 25 cases (39.5%) of penile strictures, 2 cases (3.2%) of meatus localization and 7 (10.9%) were multiple localizations on the anterior urethra. In West Africa, Akpo et al. [11] reported bulbar strictures rates close to ours, with 47.3%. Lumen N et al. [5] and Palminteri et al. [6] also reported similar rates with respectively 48.1% and 46.9% of bulbar strictures. Bulbar localization, although reported at different rates by different authors, was the first place in the location of anterior urethral stricture in both developed and developing countries. This high frequency of localization to the bulbar urethra could be related to the fact that the anatomical bulbar portion is propitious to infections. In our study, 88.8% of anterior urethral strictures were unique and multiple in 11.2% of cases similar to Lumen N et al. [5] , who had reported 13.4%. The mean length of the anterior urethral stricture was 2.05 cm with 1 to 9 cm as extremes. 36.5% (n = 23) of patients had a short (≤1 cm) strictures, 25.4% (n = 16) long strictures (>2 cm). However, Fenton et al. [12] in a study of the anterior urethra had noticed an average length of urethral stricture greater than ours with 4.1 cm. Palminteri et al. [6] reported an average length of 4.15 cm. From these results, it appeared that a large part of the strictures of the anterior urethra was medium or long. The length of the stricture is one of the criteria for the choice of the therapeutic method. Strictures less than one centimeter in length are most often treated by internal urethrotomy or by an instrumental dilatation. Whereas between one and two cm in length, a segmental urethrectomy followed by a terminal-terminal anastomosis is necessary.

We have identified 3 groups of etiology in our study: infectious, iatrogenic and traumatic. Our study showed a predominance of infectious etiologies (71.4%) followed by iatrogenic causes (17.5%). Traumatic etiology accounted for 11.1%. In our regions, the main etiologies of strictures of the anterior urethra are infectious. In Gabon Falandry [10] found an infectious origin in 52% of cases. Akpo et al. [11] and Fall et al. [4] noticed the predominance of infectious causes with respective rates of 54.3% and 63%.

However, Fleury [13] noted in Switzerland a low percentage of infectious cause 11% compared to iatrogenic causes. This confirms the fact that in developed countries, the iatrogenic etiology is the most important [1] . The infections responsible are usually acute gonococcal urethritis or Chlamydia trachomatis urethritis. We have identified one case of gonorrhea among infectious causes. 12 patients had history of urogenital schistosomiasis. Urogenital tuberculosis endemic in our country has not been identified as an etiology in our patients. Chatelain et al. [14] reported a rare bilharzia cause of urethral stricture in a study conducted in France.

The infectious origins are decreasing in African studies but remain one of the common causes of urethral stricture despite the existence and availability of antibiotics and the different means of sexual transmitted infections prevention.

The iatrogenic etiology accounted for 17.5% of the anterior urethral stricture etiologies in our study. In developed countries, urethral strictures are more likely to be of iatrogenic origin and could be explained by the fact that urologic endoscopy is a common practice in their context. Fleury [13] had noted 50% of iatrogenic etiologies. In our study the rate of iatrogenic etiologies could be explained by the increasingly common and abusive practice of urethral catheterism in doubtful asepsis conditions.

Trauma to the anterior urethra represents about 10% of urogenital trauma. Compared to the lesions of the posterior urethra, these traumas rarely occur in a vital or polytraumatic context and are rarely associated with pelvic fractures. The majority in these cases involve blunt trauma, often affecting young people who are sexual active. From these results, it appears that traumatic etiology was not the main cause in the occurrence of anterior urethral stricture.

The penile urethra stricture corresponds to a phenomenon of fibrosis of the corpus spongiosum whose morphological and functional fate is difficult to predict. The surgical treatment of such lesions is difficult and calls for the general principles of wound healing. Reconstruction of the urethra in its penile portion appears easier than the treatment of proximal strictures or strictures of the bulbar urethra because it is more accessible. In our regions, open surgery is the most commonly used treatment of urethral strictures. The most common method used after urethroplasty in our study was urethral dilatation. Thirty-three percent of the patients had benefited of instrumental dilatation. These results showed a relative decrease in the rate of patients treated only with instrumental dilatation but this rate remains high because our patients treated with urethroplasty may have an ulterior instrumental dilation. We have not noticed either incidents or accidents and none deaths recorded in the immediate or postoperative period. However, at an average follow-up of 12.51 months, 9% of the patients did not have a good result. Ibrahim Ag et al. [15] reported a lower rate than our (84.6%) in a study on urethroplasty treatment. At the period of the study, our urology division didn’t have endourology equipment, thus we didn’t performed any technique of direct visual internal urethrotomy for the management of anterior urethral stricture.

This difference could be explained by the diversity of follow-up delays. The short follow-up time of the patients was related to the non-respect of the appointments after leaving hospital by a large number of patients. All the patients whose strictures were 1 cm at most have obtained good results after 6 months of follow-up versus 85.7% for anterior urethral stricture with [1-2 cm] and 66.6% for those > 2 cm. However, our results remain superior to those of Guirassy et al. [8] who reported 81.6% success for the urethral stricture between 0.5 and 1 cm and only 18.20% success for the urethral stricture > 2.5 cm. From these results it appears from the diversity of the success rates that the short urethral stricture had more good results than the long after treatment.

Anterior urethral stricture is relatively a frequent affection in our urology division. The stricture of the anterior urethra is a pathology of all ages but it’s more frequent in young’s. The most evocative sign is dysuria but urine retention and the complications such as urethral fistulas can constitute the reason for first consultation. The diagnosis remains based on the VCUG and other exploration techniques as uroflowmetry which is not available and is an important element in the postoperative follow-up. The VCUG allowed in all cases to locate the seat, the number of stenosis and to appreciate the length of the stenosis. Aetiologies are dominated by infectious causes with a high predominance of E. coli. Diagnosis at complications stage, poor exercise conditions and the inaccessibility of diagnostic and therapeutic means often make the management difficult. The therapeutic methods are multiple and the therapeutic choice depends on the location, the number and the length of the stricture. The treatment of anterior urethral stricture remains surgical in our context. The better management of urinary tract infections and urethral trauma should be reduced significatively the burden of urethral stricture in our setting.

There is no conflict of interest.

Yameogo, C.A., Ouattara, A., Kaboré, F.A., Ky, B.D., Bougayiri, A., Traoré, O. and Kambou, T. (2017) Male Anterior Urethral Stricture: Epidemiological Profile and Management at Ouagadougou University Teaching Hospital (Burkina-Faso). Open Journal of Urology, 7, 196-206. https://doi.org/10.4236/oju.2017.711023