<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Agricultural Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2156-8553</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/as.2017.811089</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AS-80229</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Effect of Salinity on the Growth Performance, Body Composition, Antioxidant Indexes of Perinereis aibuhitensis and Total Nitrogen in the Substrate
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fu</surname><given-names>Lv</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Qing</surname><given-names>Nie</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yebing</surname><given-names>Yu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fei</surname><given-names>Liu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Linlan</surname><given-names>Lv</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Weihong</surname><given-names>Zhao</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>College of Marine and Bioengineering, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Biochemistry and Biotechnology of Marine Wetland 
and Key Laboratory for Aquaculture and Ecology of Coastal Pool of Jiangsu Province, Yancheng Institute of 
Technology, Yancheng, China</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>09</day><month>11</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>1239</fpage><lpage>1252</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>29,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>7,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2017</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>10,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In this study, the effects of different salinity levels (9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, and 33) on the growth performance, body composition, antioxidant indexes of 
  Perinereis aibuhitensis (initial average mass, 20.4 &#177; 0.3 mg) and total nitrogen in the substrate were investigated. The survival rate, specific growth rate, feed coefficient, and protein efficiency ratio under different salinity levels were measured. The results showed that the survival rate of 
  P. aibuhitensis at the salinity level of 9 was significantly lower than that of 
  P. aibuhitensis at other salinity levels (
  P &lt; 0.05). However, the survival rate of 
  P. aibuhitensis at other salinity levels was not significant (
  P &gt; 0.05). On the basis of quadratic polynomial fitting of the relationship between salinity levels and the specific growth rate, feed coefficient, and protein efficiency ratio, it was concluded that 25.36 - 25.9 is the most suitable salinity range for the growth performance of 
  P. aibuhitensis. The main body composition (moisture, crude fat, crude protein, and ash content) was measured at different salinity levels. The results indicated that, with the increase in salinity, the moisture content of 
  P. aibuhitensis decreased gradually; in contrast, the ash content increased gradually, as the salinity level increased. However, in the salinity range of 18 to 33, the difference in ash content was not significant (
  P &gt; 0.05). Salinity had a significant influence on the crude protein content (P &lt; 0.05), while it had no significant influence on crude body fat. Crude protein showed an increasing trend with the salinity increasing from 9 to 24, and decreased with the salinity increasing from 24 to 33. Antioxidant indexes such as superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione, and malondialdehyde (MDA) were analyzed, showing that in vivo MDA content was as low as the antioxidant activity at the salinity level of 24; this means low in vivo contents of active oxygen free radicals and excellent growth performance. This conclusion is consistent with that for other growth indexes. The total nitrogen content of the substrate in which the 
  P. aibuhitensis specimens were cultured for 60 days was higher than the total nitrogen in the soil. With an increase in salinity, the total nitrogen content first decreased and then increased, and the lowest value was observed at the salinity level of about 24.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;Perinereis aibuhitensis&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Growth Performance</kwd><kwd> Body Composition</kwd><kwd> Antioxidant</kwd><kwd> Total Nitrogen Content</kwd><kwd> Substrate</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Salinity is a non-nutritional factor necessary for the survival and growth of aquatic organisms, and it has an impact on various physiological activities such as growth and metabolism [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref1">1</xref>] . The food intake of aquatic organisms varies on the basis of salinity. Salinity affects the digestion and absorption of food by changing the activity of the digestive enzymes, thus affecting the weight gain rate and specific growth rate of aquatic organisms. Therefore, it is particularly important to choose the most suitable salinity range for the survival and growth of aquatic organisms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref2">2</xref>] . Body composition of aquatic organisms is composed of water, carbohydrates, proteins, fat, ash, etc. Previous studies have reported no significant differences in the effects of salinity on the body composition of fishes such as Paralichthys olivaceus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref3">3</xref>] and Platichthys stellatus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref4">4</xref>] . However, other studies have indicated that appropriate salinity levels helped to save the osmotic pressure energy in fish, resulting in good growth performance and high protein and fat content [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref5">5</xref>] . Superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and other antioxidant enzymes are important constituents of the antioxidant enzyme system in an organism. A previous study on Sebastes schlegeli [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref6">6</xref>] showed that the activities of SOD and CAT in the blood increase gradually with the decrease trend; however, another study on the Nibea japonica [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref7">7</xref>] indicated that the activities of SOD and CAT in the liver, kidney, and muscle at different salinities showed no significant differences (P &gt; 0.05), which may be related to the different salinity adaptations of different organisms.</p><p>P. aibuhitensis belongs to the family Nereididae and is mainly distributed in China; it is the main representative and dominant species or ecotype among intertidal polychaetes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref8">8</xref>] . It has important applications in aquaculture [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref10">10</xref>] , fishing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref11">11</xref>] , and medical care [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref12">12</xref>] , so the demand for P. aibuhitensis is high worldwide. However, the natural resources of P. aibuhitensis are depleting because of excessive harvesting and environmental degradation, so it has become difficult to meet the market demand. With breakthroughs in seed breeding and farming techniques, P. aibuhitensis has quickly become an important economic species for marine aquaculture in China’s coastal areas. Impoundment pond farming was initially used to culture P. aibuhitensis. Recently, saturated wet soil technology was developed because it is highly efficient and environmentally friendly. P. aibuhitensis is a euryhaline animal that tolerates salinity levels from 5 to 45 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref13">13</xref>] . Li et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref14">14</xref>] analyzed the influence of salinity and body weight on the growth of P. aibuhitensis under impounded conditions; however, there are no reports under saturated moist soil conditions. In this study, the effects of salinity on the growth performance, body composition, antioxidant indexes of P. aibuhitensis and total nitrogen in the substrate under water-saturated wet-soil conditions were investigated to provide scientific guidance for the efficient and environmentally friendly farming of P. aibuhitensis.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>No specific permit is required for operations on P. aibuhitensis in China.</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Specimen Collection</title><p>In this study, large seedlings of the same batch of fertilized P. Aibuhitensis eggs were hatched at a salinity level of 21 according to the Specifications for Artificial Propagation of Perinereis aibuhitensis (Grube) (DB32/T2450-2013). The clamworms were dug from the soil carefully and cultivated in clean seawater with a salinity level of 21 to empty the intestine. About 2700 healthy individuals with an initial average mass of 20.4 &#177; 0.3 mg were selected and divided into nine groups (each group in triplicate). The salinity levels of the groups were adjusted (via three increments per day) to 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, and 33, respectively.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Experimental Design and Feeding Management</title><p>First, soil collected from a tidal flat in Sheyang county, Yancheng city, Jiangsu province in China, was washed with tap water repeatedly to remove salt, organic matter, and debris. Then, the soil was dried and sifted through a 10-mesh sieve and baked at 60˚C for 8 h. The soil was placed in polyethylene tanks (dimensions, 61 cm &#180; 41 cm &#180; 25 cm and sand depth, 10 cm) and dipped in clean seawater with salinity levels of 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, and 33. After the soil was soaked completely, the seawater was removed, and the water-saturated soil was obtained.</p><p>The P. aibuhitensis specimens were cultivated in the breeding tank at the corresponding salinity and fed at 08:00 and 19:00 every day; the daily feeding dose was 1% - 2% and 2% - 3% fresh weight of the clamworms, respectively. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> indicates the formula and nutrients in the feed. After feeding, a suitable amount of fresh water was sprayed into the tank to supply moisture and soften the pellet fodder. The remaining bait was cleaned after feeding for 1.5 - 2 h. During the rearing, the photoperiod in the room was 14 hours:10 hours (light: dark), and</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Formulation of and ingredients in the experimental feed (%, dry weight)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ingredients</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fish meal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Soybean meal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Peanut meal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fish oil</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Corn starch</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Choline chloride</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Soy lecithin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Premix<sup>1</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Analytical composition</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dry matter</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crude protein</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.88</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crude lipid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.41</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ash</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.59</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbohydrates<sup>2</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.45</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Energy (kJ/g)<sup>3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.59</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Note: <sup>1</sup>Premix supplied the following minerals (g/kg) and vitamins (IU or mg/kg): 13.5 g CuSO<sub>4</sub>・5H<sub>2</sub>O, 58 g FeSO<sub>4</sub>・7H<sub>2</sub>O, 65 g ZnSO<sub>4</sub>・7H<sub>2</sub>O, 16 g MnSO<sub>4</sub>・4H<sub>2</sub>O, 10.8 g Na<sub>2</sub>SeO<sub>3</sub>・5H<sub>2</sub>O, 12.64 g KI, 21.5 g CoCl<sub>2</sub>・6H<sub>2</sub>O, 1,600,000 IU VA, 500,000 IU VD<sub>3</sub>, 9000 mg VE, 450 mg VK<sub>3</sub>, 700 mg VB<sub>1</sub>, 2500 mg VB<sub>2</sub>, 1000 mg VB<sub>6</sub>, 3.2 mg VB<sub>12</sub>, 18,000 mg VC, 2000 mg pantothenate, 650 mg folic acid, 1500 mg niacin, 400 mg biotin, 300 mg myoinositol; <sup>2</sup>Calculated by difference (dry matter - crude protein - crude lipid - ash) (Pedroetal., 2013); <sup>3</sup>Computed as 21.3, 17.2, and 39.5 kJ/g of proteins, carbohydrates, and lipids, respectively (Cuzonetal., 1997).</p><p>soil temperature in the breeding tank varied from 23˚C to 26˚C. All the feeding experiments were conducted for 60 days at the Intertidal Organism Culture Laboratory in Yancheng Institute of Technology.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Sample Collection and Indicators</title><sec id="s2_3_1"><title>2.3.1. Sample Collection and Growth Performance Calculation</title><p>After the feeding trial, all the clamworms were fasted for 24 h. Next, the clamworms were carefully removed from the breeding tanks and placed in clean seawater at an appropriate salinity level to empty the intestines. After the water on the surface of the clamworms was dried, the weight was recorded. Growth indicators, including the terminal average weight (TAW), survival rate (SR), specific growth ratio (SGR), feed conversion ratio (FCR) and protein efficiency ratio (PER) were calculated as described by Lv et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref15">15</xref>] using the following equations.</p><p>S R ( % ) = 1 00 &#215; N f / N i</p><p>S G R ( % / d ) = 1 00 &#215; ( Ln W f − Ln W i ) / d</p><p>F C R = F / ( W f − W i )</p><p>P E R = ( W f − W i ) / ( F &#215; P )</p><p>Among them, N<sub>f</sub> and N<sub>i</sub> indicate the number of clamworms after and before the experiment, respectively. W<sub>f</sub> and W<sub>i</sub> represent the weight (g) of the clamworms after and before the experiment, respectively; d is the culture time (day); F indicates the dry weight of food (g); and P means the protein content of the food (%).</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_2"><title>2.3.2. Measurement of Feed Nutrients and Body Content</title><p>The proximate composition of each experimental diet and pooled whole clamworms from each treatment was analyzed based on AOAC methods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref16">16</xref>] . The samples were dried at 105˚C under standard pressure to calculate the water content. The content of crude protein was determined by measuring nitrogen (N &#215; 6.25) level using the Kjeldahl systematic method. The content of crude lipid was determined as described by Folch et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref17">17</xref>] . Ash content was determined in a muffle furnace at 550˚C for 8 h. The determination of carbohydrate and total energy refers to G&#243;mez-Requeni et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref18">18</xref>] and Cuzon and Guillaume [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref19">19</xref>] , respectively.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_3"><title>2.3.3. Measurement of Antioxidant Indexes</title><p>Five clamworms from each tank were removed randomly to measure the body weight and then mixed with 0.86% frozen saline to prepare the tissue homogenate. After centrifugation at 3000 rpm and 4˚C for 10 min, the supernatant was used to measure the antioxidant indexes. SOD and CAT activities and reduced glutathione (GSH) and malondialdehyde (MDA) concentrations and the enzyme protein content were all measured using special kits provided by the Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China).</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_4"><title>2.3.4. Measurement of Total Nitrogen in the Substrate</title><p>From each tank, 100 g of mud was collected to measure the total nitrogen in the substrate before cultivation, according to Yuan’s method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref20">20</xref>] . After all the clamworms were removed, the soil in each tank was mixed thoroughly, and 100 g of soil from each tank was again collected to measure the total nitrogen in the substrate.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Statistical Analysis</title><p>The original data were edited by Excel 2007 and then analyzed using single-factor analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA; SPSS 17.0 software). If the difference was significant, Duncan’s multiple comparison test was performed. Correlativity between the specific growth rate, feed conversion ratio, protein efficiency, and salinity levels were matched using the quadratic polynomial method. Data are presented as mean &#177; standard deviation (n = 3) values. P &lt; 0.05 was used to assess the statistical significance of the results.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Effects of Salinity on the Growth Performance and Feed Conversion of P. aibuhitensis</title><p>Data in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> indicate that the level of salinity has a certain influence on the</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> SR, SGR, FCR, DFI, and PER of Perinereis aibuhitensis at different salinity levels</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Salinity</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >SR (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >IAW (mg/EP)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TAW (g/EP)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >SGR (%day<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >FCR</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PER</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.7 &#177; 1.5 <sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.4 &#177; 0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >251.4 &#177; 15.2 <sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.08 &#177; 0.16 <sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.82 &#177; 0.13<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.73 &#177; 0.12 <sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.7 &#177; 1.5<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.4 &#177; 0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >313.1 &#177; 13.5<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.51 &#177; 0.07<sup> b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.42 &#177; 0.03<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.21 &#177; 0.05<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.3 &#177; 0.6<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.4 &#177; 0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >356.2 &#177; 25.6 <sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.75 &#177; 0.11 <sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.22 &#177; 0.07 <sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.57 &#177; 0.15 <sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.7 &#177; 1.5<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.3 &#177; 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >373.4 &#177; 16.8<sup>cd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.83 &#177; 0.10<sup>cd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.15 &#177; 0.03<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.72 &#177; 0.09<sup>cd</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.7 &#177; 1.2<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.5 &#177; 0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >413.9 &#177; 13.1<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.99 &#177; 0.08<sup>de</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.05 &#177; 0.03<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.98 &#177; 0.08<sup>ef</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.7 &#177; 0.6<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.3 &#177; 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >430.7 &#177; 14.6<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.07 &#177; 0.06<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.02 &#177; 0.01 <sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.08 &#177; 0.04 <sup>f</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.3 &#177; 1.2<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.3 &#177; 0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >409.9 &#177; 24.5<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.99 &#177; 0.11<sup>de</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.07 &#177; 0.04<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.93 &#177; 0.12<sup>ef</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.7 &#177; 0.6<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.4 &#177; 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >407.2 &#177; 24.9<sup>de</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.97 &#177; 0.09<sup>de</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.08 &#177; 0.02<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.89 &#177; 0.06<sup>e</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.7 &#177; 1.2<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.4 &#177; 0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >404.3 &#177; 18.6<sup>de</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.96 &#177; 0.05<sup>de</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.10 &#177; 0.01<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.84 &#177; 0.02<sup>de</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Note: Means represent mean &#177; SE, n = 3. Means in the same line with different superscripts are significantly different (P &lt; 0.05). Terminal average weight, TAW; survival rate, SR; specific growth ratio, SGR; feed conversion ratio, FCR, protein efficiency ratio, PER; each Perinereis aibuhitensis, EP.</p><p>growth indexes of clamworms. The survival rate of clamworms at a salinity level of 9 was significantly lower than that of the other groups (P &lt; 0.05). However, the survival rate of P. aibuhitensis at the other salinity levels was not significant (P &gt; 0.05). As the salinity level increased, the specific growth rate and protein efficiency of P. aibuhitensis showed a downward trend after the first increase, while the changing trend of the feed conversion ratio was just the opposite. At higher salinity levels from 27 to 33, the specific growth rate, feed conversion ratio, and protein efficiency of P. aibuhitensis were not significant (P &gt; 0.05).</p><p>The efficiency relationship between salinity and specific growth rate, feed conversion ratio, and protein efficiency ratio was analyzed using the quadratic polynomial regression model. The regression equation for the relationship between specific growth rate and salinity is SGR = −0.00319S<sup>2</sup> + 0.16526S + 2.9228 (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). When S = 25.9, specific growth rate was the highest. The regression equation for the relationship between feed conversion ratio and salinity is FCR = 0.00277S<sup>2</sup> − 0.14047S + 0.7757 (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). When S = 25.36, feed conversion ratio was the lowest. The regression equation for the relationship between protein efficiency ratio and salinity is PER = −0.00463S<sup>2</sup> + 0.23665S + 0.01339 (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). When S = 25.56, protein efficiency ratio was the highest. Thus, the optimal salinity range for P. aibuhitensis growth was 25.36 - 25.9.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Effect of Salinity on the Body Content of P. aibuhitensis</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> shows the different body compositions (moisture, crude protein, crude fat, and ash) of P. aibuhitensis due to different salinity levels. Overall, the body moisture content decreased with increasing salinity levels, but the difference in the salinity range of 15 to 33 was not significant (P &gt; 0.05). Salinity had a significant influence on the crude protein content (P &lt; 0.05), while it had no</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Body composition of Perinereis aibuhitensis at different salinity levels</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Salinity</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Moisture (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Crude protein (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Crude lipid (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ash (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.11 &#177; 0.48 <sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.76 &#177; 0.64 <sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.06 &#177; 0.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.85 &#177; 0.14 <sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.93 &#177; 0.62<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.32 &#177; 0.35<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.13 &#177; 0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.10 &#177; 0.16<sup>ab</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.25 &#177; 0.34<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.30 &#177; 0.11<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.20 &#177; 0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.23 &#177; 0.16<sup>bc</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.24 &#177; 0.18<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.69 &#177; 0.67<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.11 &#177; 0.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.39 &#177; 0.13<sup>cd</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.26 &#177; 0.40<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.78 &#177; 0.32<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.35 &#177; 0.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.48 &#177; 0.18<sup>cd</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.16 &#177; 0.60<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.02 &#177; 0.36<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.30 &#177; 0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.57 &#177; 0.12<sup>d</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.11 &#177; 0.49<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.09 &#177; 0.53<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.29 &#177; 0.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.60 &#177; 0.14<sup>d</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.66 &#177; 0.46 <sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.92 &#177; 0.80 <sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.17 &#177; 0.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.56 &#177; 0.11<sup>d</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.40 &#177; 0.54 <sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.70 &#177; 0.98 <sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.35 &#177; 0.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.57 &#177; 0.21<sup>d</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Note: Means represent mean &#177; SE, n = 3. Means in the same line with different superscripts are significantly different (P &lt; 0.05).</p><p>significant influence on crude body fat. Crude protein showed an increasing trend with the salinity increasing from 9 to 24, and decreased with the salinity increasing from 24 to 33. The ash content was relatively low when the salinity level was low. As the salinity level increased, the ash content increased gradually. However, in the salinity range of 18 to 33, the difference in ash content was not significant (P &gt; 0.05).</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Effects of Salinity on the Antioxidant Indexes of P. aibuhitensis</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> shows the main antioxidant enzyme levels (SOD and CAT) and amounts of two non-enzymatic antioxidant small molecules (GSH and MDA) under different salinity levels. The MDA content was significantly higher in the clamworms under low salinity levels of 9 to 18 than in those under salinity levels of 21 to 33 (P &lt; 0.05). However, the MDA content was generally low and showed no obvious differences (P &gt; 0.05) in the salinity range of 21 to 33. SOD and CAT activities showed a declining and rising trend when the salinity level increased gradually; the lowest SOD value was observed at the salinity level of 24, and the lowest CAT value, at 21.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Effects of Salinity on Total Nitrogen in the Substrate</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> shows the total nitrogen content in the soil in which the P. aibuhitensis specimens were reared for 60 days under different salinity levels. Compared to the original value of TNC (0.215 &#177; 0.009 g/kg), the total nitrogen content of each group was obviously increased. Overall, the total nitrogen content first declined and then increased, and the lowest value was observed at the salinity level of 24. The total nitrogen content showed no significant differences (P &gt; 0.05) in the salinity range of 21 to 27.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Antioxidant indexes of Perinereis aibuhitensis at different salinity levels</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Salinity</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >SOD (U/mgprot)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CAT (U/mgprot)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >GSH (nmol/mgprot)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >MDA (nmol/mgprot)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.49 &#177; 2.09<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.80 &#177; 0.31<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.11 &#177; 0.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.87 &#177; 0.23<sup>e</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.13 &#177; 0.89<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.28 &#177; 0.22<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.77 &#177; 0.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.46 &#177; 0.11<sup>d</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.92 &#177; 0.71 <sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.79 &#177; 0.34<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.18 &#177; 0.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.50 &#177; 0.38 <sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.97 &#177; 0.52<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.81 &#177; 0.85<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.19 &#177; 0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.61 &#177; 0.18<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.84 &#177; 0.99<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.35 &#177; 0.78 <sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.16 &#177; 0.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.83 &#177; 0.14 <sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.59 &#177; 0.78 <sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.52 &#177; 0.75 <sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.24 &#177; 0.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.57 &#177; 0.11 <sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.12 &#177; 1.04<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.11 &#177; 0.36<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.20 &#177; 0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.65 &#177; 0.09 <sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.36 &#177; 1.13<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.24 &#177; 0.53<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.51 &#177; 0.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.67 &#177; 0.14 <sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.49 &#177; 1.30<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.61 &#177; 0.39<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.42 &#177; 0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.73 &#177; 0.12 <sup>a</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Note: Means represent mean &#177; SE, n = 3. Means in the same line with different superscripts are significantly different (P &lt; 0.05).</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Total nitrogen content in the soil in which Perinereis aibuhitensis specimens were reared at different salinity levels</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Salinity</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total nitrogen (g/kg)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.646 &#177; 0.042 <sup>f</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.264 &#177; 0.037<sup>e</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.958 &#177; 0.020<sup>d</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.737 &#177; 0.023 <sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.508 &#177; 0.018 <sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.495 &#177; 0.013 <sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.527 &#177; 0.017 <sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.635 &#177; 0.016<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.653 &#177; 0.025<sup>b</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Note: Means represent mean &#177; SE, n = 3. Means in the same line with different superscripts are significantly different (P &lt; 0.05).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>A previous study has shown that the salinity levels suitable for the growth of P. aibuhitensis have a broad range [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref13">13</xref>] . In this study, the salinity levels were observed to affect the growth performance, body composition, and antioxidant indexes of P. aibuhitensis and total nitrogen in substrate.</p><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Effects of Salinity on the Growth Performance of P. aibuhitensis</title><p>The survival rate of P. aibuhitensis at the salinity level of 9 was significantly lower than that of P. aibuhitensis in the other groups (P &lt; 0.05); this is similar to the results obtained by Zhu et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref21">21</xref>] . The main reason may be that the low-salinity environment exceeded the ability of P. aibuhitensis to regulate the osmotic pressure, resulting in the instability of the internal environment of the clamworms and metabolic disorders. Thus, some clamworms with a poor ability to adjust the osmotic pressure began to appear abnormal, and even died. Only clamworms with a strong adjustment ability can gradually adapt to a low-salinity environment. The growth performance indexes SGR and PER were significantly lower at low salinity levels of 9 to 12 than at high salinity levels, while FCR was significantly higher at low salinity levels of 9 to 12 than at high salinity levels (P &lt; 0.05). The main reason is that low salinity has an adverse effect on feed conversion, oxygen consumption rate, metabolism, digestive enzyme activities, and immunity of aquatic animals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref23">23</xref>] . At the same time, osmoregulation and other related physiological functions need additional energy, resulting in low SGR and PER and high FCR and finally causing a decline in the growth performance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref24">24</xref>] .</p><p>The quadratic polynomial regression model was used to analyze the efficiency relationship between salinity and specific growth rate, feed conversion ratio, and protein efficiency ratio of P. aibuhitensis, and the appropriate salinity range for the growth performance of P. aibuhitensis was observed to vary from 25.36 to 25.9. Within this range of salinity, the clamworms showed the highest specific growth rate and protein efficiency, lowest feed coefficient, and relatively high growth indicators. According to the principle of isotonic adjustment, aquatic animals such as euryhaline fish show the lowest penetration pressure, lowest metabolic rate, and highest rate of growth at the isotonic point [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref25">25</xref>] . When the salinity level is varied from 25.36 to 25.9, environmental salinity may be closer to the isotonic point of the clamworms, and they show a good growth trend. If the clamworms are cultivated at a lower or higher salinity environment in which the salinity level deviates greatly from the isotonic point, the clamworms have to use a lot of energy to regulate the osmotic pressure and maintain a stable internal environment; thus, the energy used for metabolism, growth, and other life activities is reduced [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref26">26</xref>] . Thus, low or high salinity will inhibit the growth of P. aibuhitensis. However, P. aibuhitensis showed better growth at high salinity than at low salinity.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Effects of Salinity on the Body Content of P. aibuhitensis</title><p>The body moisture content of P. aibuhitensis decreased with increasing salinity level and was significantly higher at low salinity levels than at high salinity levels (P &lt; 0.05), which is consistent with the Penaeus vannamei [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref27">27</xref>] . The main reason is that clamworms in a low-salt environment need to absorb more water to maintain homeostasis and enhance their ability to adapt to the environment.</p><p>Maximum crude protein contents were observed at the salinity level of 24. The energy clamworms use to perform osmotic regulation is mainly provided by the body lipids and proteins, so salinity can also affect the behavior, feeding, and immunity of clamworms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref26">26</xref>] . Thus, the combined effects of salinity on the physiological functions of clamworms determine changes in their body fat and protein contents [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref24">24</xref>] . When the salinity level is around 24, body fluid of P. aibuhitensis may be very close to the water osmotic pressure, which means that less the energy required for regulating osmotic pressure, less the consumption of proteins and fat. As a result, the body fat and crude protein contents are higher. At higher salinity levels of about 24 to 33, the body ash content was at a high level, and the difference was not significant (P &gt; 0.05).</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Effects of Salinity on the Antioxidant Indexes of P. aibuhitensis</title><p>An excess of reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>), not only kill invasion pathogens but also damage the body itself, such as converting unsaturated fatty acids, destroying the cell membrane structure, and causing DNA degradation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref28">28</xref>] . MDA is a hazardous peroxide produced by peroxidation, and its content indicates the degree of oxidation. Antioxidant enzyme systems of aquatic animals (mainly SOD and CAT) play an important role in removing excess free radicals and alleviating body damage [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref29">29</xref>] . Thus, the antioxidant enzyme system is an important immune response system for aquatic animals to deal with salinity and other environmental stresses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref30">30</xref>] .</p><p>Peroxidation can not only lead to elevated levels of MDA but also induce increased SOD and CAT activities and GSH content to clear the free radicals produced by peroxidation. Therefore, the level of antioxidant enzyme activity can reflect the physiological condition of P. aibuhitensis at different salinity levels to some extent, and it can be used as an important physiological indicator for measuring whether aquatic animals are stressed by salinity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref31">31</xref>] . In this study, the P. aibuhitensis specimens were found to have high MDA content and SOD and CAT activities at low salinity. The main reason for this phenomenon may be because P. aibuhitensis experiences body stress, resulting in an increased metabolic rate, oxygen consumption rate, and demand for energy. The short-term increase in the contents of MDA and other antioxidant small molecules induces an increase in antioxidant enzyme activity, which helps to increase the resistance of P. aibuhitensis to the external environment; this was confirmed by a study on Takifugu obscurus conducted by Bian et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref32">32</xref>] . In the salinity range of 21 to 33, MDA level in P. aibuhitensis is low and shows no differences with changes in salinity (P &gt; 0.05). Considering the abovementioned growth indicators of P. aibuhitensis, it might be that in an appropriate salinity range, P. aibuhitensis shows a good growth trend and low active oxygen content. The antioxidant enzyme system can effectively remove free radicals and ROS from the body, meaning that free radical production and clearance are in dynamic equilibrium [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref29">29</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s4_4"><title>4.4. Effects of Salinity on Total Nitrogen in the Substrate</title><p>Total nitrogen in the substrate refers to the sum of organic and inorganic nitrogen, such as NO 3 − , NO 2 − , NH 4 + , and NH<sub>3</sub>, in the substrate. In this experiment, total nitrogen content of the sediment in which the clamworms were reared for 60 days was much higher than the soil total nitrogen.</p><p>At salinity in the range of 9 to 33, the total nitrogen content of the sediment decreased first as the salinity increased and then reached a minimum value when the salinity was around 24. Finally, it increased with increasing salinity levels. The following two points were speculated after the experiment, but further studies are required to prove them. 1) The total nitrogen content may be affected by the ammonia excretion rate of the clamworms. A previous study showed that salinity has an effect on the ammonia excretion rate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref33">33</xref>] . In this experiment, the total nitrogen content increased at first and then decreased with an increase of salinity, and the lowest values were observed at the salinity level of 24. Salinity of about 24 may be more appropriate for the growth and survival of P. aibuhitensis with less direct elimination of ammonia produced by protein metabolism, resulting in the low ammonia excretion rate. Therefore, the total nitrogen content in the substrate was low. 2) The total nitrogen content of the substrate may be related to the digestive enzyme activities of the clamworms. Digestion and absorption of nutrition require the digestive enzymes of aquatic animals. Since the amount of ions may change when they are accumulated in the digestive glands of aquatic animals under different salinity conditions, the activities of digestive enzymes may be different; other mechanisms may also exist, for example, a change in salinity at a certain range may affect the endocrine physiology of aquatic animals, thereby affecting the secretion of digestive enzymes and dynamic changes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref34">34</xref>] . This can be divided into activating effect, no effect, and inhibition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80229-ref35">35</xref>] . P. aibuhitensis showed relatively better growth performance at the salinity of about 24. With the activating effect of salinity on the enzymatic activity of clamworms, the activities of the digestive enzymes, such as proteases, are increased, which means the higher apparent digestibility of clamworms, and lower organic nitrogen content in the feces.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank the ELIXIGEN (Shanghai, China) Co., Ltd. for the language editing service. This study was supported by grants from the National Spark Program project (2014GA690027), the Jiangsu Agricultural Science and Technology Support Program Project (BE2014346), the Yancheng agricultural science and technology innovation special guidance funds (YK2016029), and the Opening Project of Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Biochemistry and Biotechnology of Marine Wetland (K2016013).</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Lv, F., Nie, Q., Yu, Y.B., Liu, F., Lv, L.L. and Zhao, W.H. (2017) Effect of Salinity on the Growth Performance, Body Composition, Antioxidant Indexes of Perinereis aibuhitensis and Total Nitrogen in the Substrate. Agricultural Sciences, 8, 1239-1252. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2017.811089</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.80229-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ye, F.L. (2002) Fish Ecology. Guangdong Higher Education Press, Guangzhou, 22-84.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80229-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">You, H.Z., Sun, Z.J. and Zhang, Q. (2013) Effects of Salinity on Feeding, Growth and Body Composition of Juvenile Leopard Coral Trout Plectropomus leopardus. Journal of Dalian Ocean University, 28, 89-93.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80229-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, G.Z., Huang, G.Q. and Tian, S.J. (2008) Effect of Salinity Stress and Following Recovery on the Growth, Energy Allocation and Body Composition of Juvenile Paralichthys olivaceus. Journal of Fisheries of China, 32, 402-410.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80229-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">You, H.Z., Yang, Z.Q. and Ge, S.S. (2009) Effects of Salinity on Muscle Biochemical Composition and Energy Budget of Juvenile Platichthys stellatus. Hebei Fisheries, 1, 16-19.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80229-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, X.M., Li, X.X. and Leng, X.J. (2008) Comparative Study of Salinity on Growth and Muscle Composition of Tilapia and Snakehead. Journal of Shanghai Fisheries University, 17, 242-246.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80229-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, X.J., Zhang, X.M. and Li, W.T. (2005) Effects of Salinity on the Non-Specific Immuno-Enzymetic Activity of Sebastes schlegeli. Marine Fisheries Research, 26, 137-142.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80229-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, Y.B., Hu, Z.H. and Zhu, Y.H. (2015) Effect of Salinity on Growth and Non-Specific Immunity of Nibea japonica. Journal of Zhejiang Ocean University, 34, 26-31.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80229-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sun, R. and Yang, D.J. (2004) Fauna Sinica, Invertebrate. Annelida, Polychaeta (II), Nereidida, 33, 30-41</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80229-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Deng, J.S., Ma, S., Niu, H.X., Dong, S.L. and Su, Y.P. (2007) An Experiment of Shrimp (Fenneropenaeus chinensis) Culture by Inputting Polychaetes (Perinereis aibuhitensis). Transactions of Oceanology and Limnology, 2, 135-140.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80229-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, S.L., Liu, Y., Yang, H.S., You, K., Chen, M.Y. and Yu, L.D. (2006) Effects of Perinereis aibuhitensis and Eisenia foetida on Growth and Immune Parameters of the Shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Journal of Fishery Sciences of China, 13, 561-565.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80229-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gu, X.Y., Jiang, X.M., Zheng, Z.M. and Jin, C.H. (2002) Biological Characteristics of Perinereis aibuhitensis Grube and Status of Its Utilization. Modern Fisheries Information, 17, 33-34.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80229-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pan, W., Liu, X., Ge, F., Han, J. and Zheng, T. (2004) Perinerin, a Novel Antimicrobial Peptide Purified from the Clamworm Perinereis aibuhitensis Grube and Its Partial Characterization. Journal Biochemistry (Tokyo), 135, 297-304.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/jb/mvh036</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80229-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Feng, S.C., Huang, G.Q. and Lai, Z.P. (2014) Tolerability Study of Temperature, Salinity and Exposure and Desiccation of Perinereis aibuhitensis. Transactions of Oceanology and Limnology, 1, 109-114.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80229-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, X.S., Peng, Y.X. and Shao, Y.Z. (2006) Impact of Salinity and Body Weight on Growth of Perinereis aibuhitensis. Reservoir Fisheries, 26, 14-15.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80229-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lv, F., Liu, F., Yu, Y., Wang, A., Yang, W., Nie, Q. and Wang, T. (2017) Effects of Dietary Lipid Levels on Growth, Body Composition and Antioxidants of Clamworm (Perinereis aibuhitensis). Aquaculture Reports, 6, 1-7.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2017.02.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80229-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Horowitz, W. and Latimer, G.W. (2006) Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 18th Edition, Gaithersburg Md.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80229-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Folch, J., Lees, M. and Sloane-Stanley, G. (1957) A Simple Method for the Isolation and Purification of Total Lipids from Animal Tissues. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 226, 497-509.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80229-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gómez-Requeni, P., Bedolla-Cázares, F., Montecchia, C., Zorrilla, J., Villian, M., Toledo-Cuevas, E.M. and Canosa, F. (2013) Effects of Increasing the Dietary Lipid Levels on the Growth Performance, Body Composition and Digestive Enzyme Activities of the Teleost Pejerrey (Odontesthes bonariensis). Aquaculture, 416, 15-22.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.08.027</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80229-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Cuzon, G. and Guillaume, J. (1997) Energy and Protein: Energy Ratio. In: D’Abramo, L.R., Conklin, D.E. and Akiyama, D.M., Eds., Crustacean Nutrition, Advances in World Aquaculture Vol. VI, World Aquaculture Society, USA, 51-70.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80229-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yuan, J., Ji, P.Y. and Yuan, Y. (2009) Measurement of Total Nitrogen in the Soil with Amended Kjeldahl Determination. Environmental Science and Management, 34, 143-146.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80229-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhu, F.X., Wang, J.Y. and Tao, S.S. (1999) Holding Technology Research of Perinereis aibuhitensis. Qilu Fisheries, 16, 1-2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80229-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bowden, T.J. (2008) Modulation of the Immune System of Fish by Their Environment. Fish &amp; Shellfish Immunology, 25, 373-383.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2008.03.017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80229-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tsuzuki, M.Y., Sugai, J.K., Maciel, J.C., Francisco, C.J. and Cerqueira, V.R. (2007) Survival, Growth and Digestive Enzyme Activity of Juveniles of the Fat Snook (Centropomus parallelus) Reared at Different Salinities. Aquaculture, 271, 319-325.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.05.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80229-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zeng, L., Lei, J.L. and Liu, B. (2013) Effects of Salinity on Growth and Muscle Composition of Juvenile Turbot Scophthalmus maximus. Journal of Fisheries of China, 37, 1535-1541. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1231.2013.38714</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80229-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kilambi, R.V. (1980) Food Consumption, Growth and Survival of Grass Carp Ctenopharyngodon idella Val at Four Salinities. Journal of Fish Biology, 17, 613-618.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1980.tb02794.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80229-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boeuf, G. and Payan, P. (2001) How Should Salinity Influence Fish Growth? Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology-Part C: Toxicology &amp; Pharmacology, 130, 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1532-0456(01)00268-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80229-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huang, K., Wang, W. and Lu, J. (2004) Effects of Salinity on Growth and Biochemical Composition of Penaeus vannamei. Marine Science, 28, 20-25.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80229-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xing, J., Lin, T.T. and Zhan, W.B. (2008) Variations of Enzyme Activities in the Haemocytes of Scallop Chlamys farreri after Infection with the Acute Virus Necrobiotic Virus (AVNV). Fish &amp; Shellfish Immunology, 25, 847-852.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2008.09.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80229-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pipe, R.K., Porter, C. and Livingstone, D.R. (1993) Antioxidant Enzymes Associated with the Blood Cells and Hemolymph of the Mussel Mytilus edulis. Fish &amp; Shellfish Immunology, 3, 221-233. https://doi.org/10.1006/fsim.1993.1022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80229-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, Z.N., Lin, T.T. and Yao, Z.L. (2012) Effect of Salinity on Antioxidant Enzyme Activity and Growth of Clam Cyclina sinensis. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 31, 2625-2630.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80229-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, Y., Zhuang, P. and Zhang, L.Z. (2011) Effects of Salinity on Survival, Growth and Antioxidant Defense System of Siganus guttatus. Journal of Fisheries of China, 35, 66-73.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80229-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bian, P.J., Qiu, C.G. and Xu, S.L. (2014) Effect of Salinity on Growth, Non-Specific Immunity and Antioxidant Enzyme Activity of Takifugu obscurus. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica, 38, 108-114.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80229-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cai, D.Y. and Yan, X.Z. (2014) Effects of Salinity on Oxygen Consumption Rate and Ammonia-N Excretion Rate of Perinereis aibuhitensis. Marine Sciences, 38, 54-57.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80229-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lv, F., Huang, J.T. and Yu, Y.B. (2010) Effects of Salinity on Growth, Muscle Composition and Protease Activity of Portunus trituberculatus. Transactions of Oceanology and Limnology, 4, 137-142.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80229-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Luo, M.Z., Guan, R.Z. and Lin, H. (2015) Effects of Salinity on Growth Performance and Digestive Enzyme Activity of Flower Eel and Pacific Double-Color Eel Elver. Acta Hydro biologica Sinica, 39, 653-660.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>