With Radio over Fiber is just sending the radio signals over optical fiber. Easy maintenance, low power units, simple remote antennas, low attenuation loss, large bandwidth and reduced power consumption are few benefits of RoF link. RoF is an auspicious solution to accomplish the increasing demand of wireless and user bandwidth. In RoF system the only task of Base station is to convert optical signal into Radio signal. Figure 1(a) shows layout of simple bidirectional directly modulated RoF link. Modulation, multiplexing, coding are performed at Central Unit CU. The receiver consists of Photodiode to provide an RF power output proportional to the square of the input optical power. In recent

advancement laser, photodiode and circulator are replaced with a single electronic device called electro absorption modulator [1] as shown in Figure 1(b). EAM acts as photodiode for downlink and modulator for uplink. No light source is needed at RAU which makes it much simpler and cheaper. In 2012 A. Kumar & N. Agarwal worked on RoF integration microwave and optical communication access to broadband wireless communications [2] . Three methods implemented into RoF and compared with Attenuation, Scattering, BER and CNR.

Satellite Communication, mobile radio communication, broadband and wireless LAN are few application of RoF. Table 1 shows few advantages of RoF in mobile communication network [3] [4] [5] [6] . Laser diode non linearity is one of the major drawbacks of RoF which gives rise to inter modulation distortion and clipping noise. Signal Integrity is one of the biggest concerns for system designers [7] [8] . System level research and designing helps engineers to achieve their goals of signal Integrity in any network or systems.

First step in optical system designing is to select right modulation technique. Modulation technique converts electrical signal into bit stream. We compared two well-known modulation NRZ (Non return to zero) and RZ (return to zero). Both techniques were analyzed with PRBS bit generator at 10 GB rate as shown in Figure 2.

The binary data should be encoded into electrical signal or optical waveform signal. NRZ is most commonly used binary data encoding. In NRZ bit period is the time given to transmitted bit where high amplitude is 1 and low amplitude is 0 and the sequence is called stream [9] . In RZ every bit will return to zero [10] . The pulse in NRZ have more energy than RZ one. Low cost and simple engineering makes NRZ most favorite. For optical communication system which is working on 10G or above the RZ increases transmit distance. In optical domain an extra Mach-Zehnder modulator is used, which is an expensive solution, But in electrical a high speed OR gate can be used as a cost efficient solution [11] . NRZ is not self-clocking so additional techniques should be used to avoid bit slip [11] . Synchronization in NRZ is handled via square wave signal known as bit clock [9] .

In NRZ modulation the whole bit slot is occupied by 1 bit and no drop between two bits Figure 3. While in RZ modulation the amplitude return to zero

between each bit. NRZ took half the bandwidth as shown in Figure 4. So it’s more data efficient. Finally eye diagram on receiver side of both NRZ & RZ are shown in Figure 5.

Now a day’s RoF applications are expanding and after significant contribution in telecommunication it’s also benefiting the short range and LAN networks. While working on different scenarios for maintaining signal integrity in RoF network it’s also mandatory to check the system design techniques and select right component for transceiver designed for specific networks or scenarios. Figure 6 shows a basic RoF system designed in Optic System 14.0. On receiver side two types of photo detectors PIN & APD are used to compare the performance and select right photo detector for RoF receiver.

RoF is not all the time use for WAN but it also have applications in LAN. So keeping this in mind we tested the system with 5, 10, & 15 Kilometers with both PIN & APD photo detectors on receiver side. Performance of PIN photo detector was much better than APD at 5 Km network, but as we start increasing the network area the APD photo detector show increase in Q-factor and on both 10 and 15 Km the q factor of APD keeps increasing while reverse in case of PIN

photo detector. Figure 7 shows the comparison of both photo detectors on 5, 10 and 15 Km network. Figure 8 shows eye diagram of PIN and APD photo detector at 15 Kilometers.

As photo detector is one of most important component of RoF system so selecting a right photo detector can play great role in maintain signal integrity in system. From the above results we can see that transceivers with PIN photo detectors are suitable for LAN or campus communication RoF network as it shows better result on small distance communication while for WAN APD photo detector can be good candidate. The wide intrinsic region makes the PIN diode an inferior rectifier but make the PIN diode suitable for attenuators, fast switches, and high voltage power electronic applications. An avalanche photodiode (APD) is highly sensitive semiconductor device. Optical receiver with APD generally provides higher SNR for same optical power.

Two well-known modulation techniques NRZ and RZ were analyzed and NRZ (non-return to zero) was found more data efficient due to less bandwidth usage than RZ modulation. Secondly APD and PIN photo detectors were simulated in RoF system. From simulation results performed with different network lengths, it was cleared that APD is the best candidate for maintaining signal integrity in long networks. Selecting right modulation technique and Photo detector can improve the Integrity of Radio over Fiber system. Still work can be done on other components and improve system performance.

This research is supported by CAS-TWAS. We are thankful to all teacher and fellow colleague of MESIC for their contribution.

Kashif, R., Famoriji, O.J. and Lin, F.J. (2017) Radio over Fiber System Level Performance Analysis, Maintaining Signal Integrity. Journal of Computer and Communications, 5, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.4236/jcc.2017.513001