<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Access Library Journal</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2333-9705</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oalib.1103961</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ-79860</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Business&amp;Economics</subject><subject> Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject><subject> Social Sciences&amp;Humanities</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Investigate the Role of Education for Increasing Citizens’ Awareness in the Implementation and Operation of Wastewater Collection System
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zohreh</surname><given-names>Mohammadi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Akramolmolook</surname><given-names>Lahijanian</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Abdolah</surname><given-names>Rashidi Mehrabadi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Water and Wastewater, Power &amp;amp; Water University of Technology (PWUT), Tehran, Iran</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Environment &amp;amp; Energy, Science and Research, Islamic Azad of University, Tehran, Iran</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>Zmohammadi1974@gmail.com(ZM)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>11</day><month>10</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>10</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>14</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>22,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>23,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2017</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>26,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  This study aimed to investigate the role of education in promoting citizens’ awareness about the issue of wastewater network and facilities in order to reduce the technical, economic, social and environmental problems. This is a descriptive-survey research. Questionnaire was used to collect data. Citizens of district 1 of Water and Wastewater of Mashhad were population of this research including 384 people. SPSS
   18 was used to analyze data both descriptive and inferential statistics. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used for testing normality of the data. One-sample 
  t
  -test, chi-square test and Spearman rank correlation test, were used to test hypotheses of research. Both of hypotheses of research were confirmed. Hypotheses are effective including raising awareness of citizens in the implementation and proper operation of wastewater network. The results show there is a direct relationship between knowledge level and education level. Due to management, economic, cultural problems, lack of trust and lack of citizen satisfaction, as well as their low level of awareness, implementation and operation of the facility are faced with a problem. According to the results, developing an educational program for citizens and its implementation by public relations and public education by water and Wastewater Company seems essential.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Wastewater</kwd><kwd> Citizenship</kwd><kwd> Education</kwd><kwd> Operational</kwd><kwd> Collection System</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Today, along with the increasing importance of water in the world, paying attention to related and influential industry in ensuring the health and safety of people and the environment has been very important [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79860-ref1">1</xref>] . Water harvesting and delivering it to the consumer, apart from the shortcomings and limitations of the World Wide Web, however, is done. But neglecting the destructive effects of its wastewater is the issue that has been neglected in some societies. While in advanced Western societies with a proper understanding of the necessity of a vital network of wastewater, serious steps have been taken many years ago while in Iran are facing with a delay in this field in recent several decades [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79860-ref2">2</xref>] . Achieving sustainable development and realization of creating healthy city, observing environmental hygiene practices, controlling environmental pollution, specifically in the field of water and wastewater, and avoiding polluting water resources are important factors to provide public health [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79860-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>Urban wastewater collection system generally are made in order to collect and improve the quality of collected wastewater from urban population centers and sometimes some industries’ wastewater mixing with municipal wastewater [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79860-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>Due to technical issues, economic and environmental aspects, wastewater facilities of cities require maintenance and protection [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79860-ref5">5</xref>] such as water and gas distribution networks. The importance of proper operation of the wastewater facilities is in its planning and implementation. It results in increasing efficiency, longer life and reduces public facilities during the period of its operation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79860-ref6">6</xref>] . As well, lack of accurate operation of these facilities resulted in urban environmental pollution resulted in prevalence of different diseases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79860-ref7">7</xref>] . The water and wastewater company of Mashhad M (a religious city and one of the metropolises of Iran) has been designing, implementing and exploiting the sewage network of the city for many years to protect the environment, reducing the health problems caused by wastewater disposal along the road, control and prevention of infiltration and contamination caused by the disposal of raw sewage to aquifers and the reuse of effluent from wastewater treatment plants. At present, part of the city’s sewage network has been implemented and exploited. Part of the city still does not run this project and waste disposal is traditionally done. In the other part, the sewage network is under construction and construction.</p><p>Citizens as an important social factor and the user of drinking water providing services supply and wastewater disposal play important role in water and wastewater plans development projects [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79860-ref8">8</xref>] . Problem and significance of this investigation is due to attitude of citizens about wastewater network. Hence, according to importance of this subject, assessing the attitudes and awareness level of citizens as an affecting variable in the implementation and proper operation of the wastewater network and its related installations, the role of education as a factor affecting the promotion of knowledge level and attitudes of citizens in this matter is investigated.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methodology</title><p>This is a descriptive-survey research. In this research, method and information gathering tool in addition to library method, Internet search and archived reports of water and wastewater company of Mashhad, the field method of the citizens’ specific questionnaire and interviews of managers and executives and sewage companies in the water and wastewater company of Mashhad has been used.</p><p>The hypotheses include raising awareness level of citizens in the effective implementation and utilization of wastewater network. Customer satisfaction is effective over the implementation of water and sanitation development projects. Population of this research includes citizens of water and wastewater company of Mashhad as 384 people by simple random method. Formal validity was used in order to validate the validity of the questionnaire. Thus the questionnaire was distributed among managers and experts of Mashhad Water and wastewater Company. Validity of the questionnaire was assessed by their views. SPSS was used for descriptive and inferential analysis. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to test normality of data. One-sample t-test, chi-square test and Spearman rank correlation test were used to test the hypotheses. Viewpoints of 10 managers, experts of water and wastewater company of Mashhad were used to confirm validity of the questionnaire. For calculating reliability of the questionnaire SPSS 18 with Cronbach’s alpha was used. The trust factor was calculated for 30 people with Cronbach’s alpha which results in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, as below.</p><p>According to the <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, Cronbach alpha reliability coefficient for the questionnaire is equal to 0.715 (at least Cronbach’s alpha) that is higher than 7% (minimum amount of Cronbach’s alpha). Hence, reliability and validity of the questionnaire is good.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Discussion and Results</title><p>Before examining hypotheses of research, in order to learn how to answer questions, the questionnaire was studied by tables and frequency charts. Statistical data describing the results of the questionnaires based on respondents’ demographic characteristics including age, sex, education, occupation, etc. are as follows:</p><p>− Age of most of respondents (38.5 percent) is between 25 and 35 years.</p><p>− Most of respondents (54.4 percent) are male.</p><p>− Education level of most of respondents (33.9 percent) is bachelor.</p><p>− Most of respondents (34.4 percent) are employees.</p><p>According to the <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> and the <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>, based on citizens’ response to the questionnaire to the familiarity level of most of respondents with wastewater</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Calculation of reliability (Cronbach’s alpha)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cronbach’s alpha coefficient</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.715</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Familiarity level of most of respondents with wastewater collection and its facilities</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Familiarity level</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I know too much</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I know much</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I know somehow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >144</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I know low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >143</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I do not know</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >384</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>network and its facilities is 37.2%. In addition, 18.2% of the respondents are not familiar with wastewater network and its facilities familiarity level of 37.2% of respondents is low, 3.6% is high, 3.4% is very much.</p><p>According to the <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> and the <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>, the importance level of most respondents for the implementation of the wastewater collection system, is medium (56 percent). Also, importance level for 10.6% of respondents is very much, for 27.9% is much, for 3.9% is low, and for 1.6% is very low.</p><p>According to <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>, familiarity level of most respondents with public relation services and public education of water and wastewater company is low (38.3). In addition, 37.5% of respondents are not familiar with public relation services and public education of water and wastewater Company of Mashhad. Familiarity level of 23.2% of respondents is high somehow. Notably, familiarity level of none of respondents is not very much.</p><p>According to <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>, most of respondents are not familiar with information system 122 of water and Wastewater Company of Mashhad at all (41.7%). Around 31% of respondents are familiar with the information system 122 of Water and wastewater Company low, 23.7% are familiar with the information system 122 of Water and wastewater Company somehow, 2.3% are familiar with the information system 122 of Water and wastewater Company very much, 1.3% are familiar with the information system 122 of Water and wastewater Company very much.</p><p>According to <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>, most of respondents are not familiar with</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> The importance level of wastewater collection system in view of respondents</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Importance level</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Very much</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >215</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Much</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >107</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Very low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >384</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Familiarity of most respondents with public services and public education of Water and wastewater company in view of respondents</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Familiarity level with public relationship services and public education of water and wastewater services</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I am familiar very much</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I am familiar much</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I am familiar somehow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I am familiar low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >147</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I am not familiar at all</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >144</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >384</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Familiarity level of citizens with information system 122 of water and Wastewater Company in view of respondents</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Familiarity level with information system 122 of water and Wastewater Company</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I am familiar very much</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I am familiar much</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I am familiar somehow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I am familiar low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >119</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I am not familiar at all</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >384</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Familiarity level of citizens with operating management of life place in view of respondents</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Familiarity level with operating management of life place</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I am familiar very much</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I am familiar much</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I am familiar somehow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I am familiar low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >147</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I am not familiar at all</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >154</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >384</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>operating management of their residential area at all (40.1%). Familiarity level of 38.3% of respondents is low, 19.5% of respondents are somehow, 1.8% of respondents are high, and 0.3% of respondents are very much.</p><p>According to <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>, most of respondents have not referred to operating management of their life region (49.7%). Refer level of 24% of respondents is low, refer level of 20.8% of respondents is somehow, refer level of 82.5% of respondents is much, refer level of 3% of respondents is very much.</p><p>According to <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>, most of respondents believe that the effect level of education on raising awareness of citizens on the implementation and proper operation of the wastewater network is very much (49.5%). In addition, 28.4% of respondents believe this impact level is very much, 14.6% is in average</p><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Referring amount of citizens to operation management of residence region in viewpoint of respondents</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Coming percentage to operation management of residence region</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I have come there very much</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I have come there many times</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I have come there somehow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I have come there low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >I have not come at all</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >191</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >384</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref></label><caption><title> Impact of education on raising awareness level of citizens in proper implementing and operating of wastewater collection system in viewpoint of respondents</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >The effect of education on raising awareness of citizens</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Very much</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >190</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Much</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >109</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Education has no effect</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >384</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>level, 6.8% is very much. In addition, 0.8% of respondents believe that education has no impact on raising awareness level of citizens on proper operating and implementation of wastewater network.</p><p>According to <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref>, satisfaction level of most of respondents of performance of water and wastewater company in providing services is average (43.6%). Satisfaction level of 32.9% of respondents is low, satisfaction level of 6% is high, satisfaction level of 1% is very much. In addition, 16.7% of respondents are not satisfied with performance of wastewater company in providing services at all. The <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>0 shows comparison between descriptive results of questions of questionnaire based on priority level and importance level in viewpoint of citizens.</p><p>After describing the questionnaire data, hypotheses were tested and data were analyzed in two descriptive and inferential statistics. In order to describe the above-mentioned data, bar graphs, frequency tables and statistical indicators were used such as frequency, percentage, average. Inferential statistics was used including Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality of the data and one-sample t-test, chi-square test and Spearman rank correlation test were used to test the hypothesis.</p><p>First hypothesis: promote citizens’ awareness level in effective implementation and proper operation of the wastewater network.</p><p>Single-sample t-test was used to investigate the relationship between two variables including “raise the level of awareness of citizens” and “implementation and proper operation of sewerage network”.</p><p>According to the <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>1, we see that average responses of citizens to the effects of promoting citizens’ awareness level in implementing and proper operation of sewerage network is 4.44 that is larger than average mean μ = 3. Sig is 0 that is smaller than 0.05. T-value is 12.55 that is a positive amount. Hence, H<sub>0</sub> is rejected with 95% confidence. According to significant relationship between the two variables, it is claimed that raising awareness of citizens in the implementation and utilization of sewerage network is effective and h1 is confirmed.</p><p>The second hypothesis: customer satisfaction over the implementation of water and wastewater projects is effective.</p><table-wrap id="table9" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref></label><caption><title> Citizen’s satisfaction with the performance of water and wastewater services in terms of respondents</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Satisfaction with the performance of water and wastewater company in the provision of services</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Very much</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Much</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >167</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >126</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Not at all</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >384</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table10" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>0</label><caption><title> A comparison between descriptive results of questions of questionnaire based on priority level and importance level in viewpoint of citizens</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >The importance and priority of the citizens</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Subject</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Row</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Industrial wastewater collection</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Collect surface runoff</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Water and wastewater treatment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Household wastewater and public collection</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Supply of clean and sanitation water</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Duty scope of water and wastewater company</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wastewater reuse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lack of sanitation in public places</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Promote public health and prevent disease outbreaks</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Collection and disposal of wastewater sewage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Environmental protection, prevention of pollution of groundwater and soil</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Purpose is using collection network and wastewater treatment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Revenue decreased of shopkeepers</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Damage to public and private property</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Endanger the physical and mental health of citizens and workers</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Noise pollution and discomfort</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Traffic disruptions</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Social problems of establishing wastewater network in residential areas</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No problem</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Clogging pipes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Back home sewage problem (rejection)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Scent at home</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Increasing the beetles and insects</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >The major problems in the operation of the sewerage network</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No effect</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >providing economic welfare of citizens</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Providing social welfare of citizens</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Environmental Protection</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maintaining Health And health of citizens</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Effect of implementing sewerage network in the lives of citizens</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >There is no advantage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Economic advantage than absorption wells</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Contribute to the implementation of development projects and infrastructure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Maintain the strength of the foundations of buildings</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Environmental protection and health promotion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Benefits of buying drainage split</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >The need to reform home plumbing system</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Accountability of current system i.e. cesspools</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fear of further problems such as odor and rejection of waste production</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >High costs of split wastewater buy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lack of knowledge</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >The reasons for wanting to buy a wastewater split</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Not wanting to buy a split even when water is stopped</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >In cash</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Not wanting to Buy Split</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Using banking facilities</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >By installments</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Priority of purchase type of wastewater split</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hepatitis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Typhoid fever</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cholera</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diarrheal diseases</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Infectious diseases</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sewage-borne diseases to humans</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >The high cost cavity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Traditional and old type</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Safety problems related to loss of well</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Limited capacity is and early discharge</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Soil and groundwater pollution</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Because of its usefulness and problems of absorption wells</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Books, educational videos</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Education in schools, raised by Clergymen in mosques</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Posters, pamphlets and publications by the Water and Wastewater Company</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Newspapers and magazines</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Radio and TV</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >The best media to educate and increase awareness-raising in the construction of sewerage network</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Recoil sewage into building and Beetle Infestation problem solving</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sign up and receive the water branching</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sign up and receive wastewater split</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Separate water meter of apartment and condominium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Solving payment of Water and Sewage problems</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Doing affairs and receiving services of utilization management clients of living area</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table11" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>1</label><caption><title> One-sample t-test results (first hypothesis)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Mean</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Standard deviation</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >t-test</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >The average difference between the assumed mean</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Sig</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >The average difference of the assumed mean</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Max limit</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Min limit</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Responses of citizens to the effects level of promoting awareness of the citizens in the implementation and proper operation of sewerage network</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >384</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.66</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Single-sample t-test was used in order to investigate relationship between “customer satisfaction” and “implementation of water and wastewater projects”.</p><p>According to the <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>2, it is observed that the average of customer satisfaction on implementation of development projects of Water and Wastewater Company is 57.3 that is larger than the average assumptions (μ = 3). Sig is 0 that is less than 0.05. Also, t-value is 12.97 that is a positive amount. Hence, H<sub>0</sub> is rejected with 95% confidence. According to significant relationship between the two variables, it is said satisfaction level of clients on implementation of clients is effective on water and sanitation development projects.</p><p>According to <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>3, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient value between awareness of people and education level is 0.237. As sig are 0, which is less than 0.05. Hence, it is claimed there is a significant relationship between awareness of people and their education level. As the correlation coefficient is positive, it is a positive and direct relationship i.e. more educational level of people results in higher awareness of sewerage network and its related installations.</p><p>According to <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>4, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient value is 0.266 that is larger than 0.05. Hence, H<sub>0</sub> is accepted by 95% confidence. So, there is not significant relationship between awareness of people and their age.</p><p>Based on the <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>5, the amount of Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient between the awareness of the people and their job is 0.122. As sig level is 0.017 and is less than 0.05, hence there is a significant level is 0.017, that is less than 0.05, there is a significant relationship between awareness of people and their job. As correlation amount is positive, the relationship is positive and direct i.e.</p><table-wrap id="table12" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>2</label><caption><title> Results of one-sample t-test (second hypothesis)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Average</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >SD</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >T-Value</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >The average difference between the assumed mean</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Sig</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >The average difference of the assumed mean</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Max limit</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Min limit</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Responses of citizens to the impact of customer satisfaction on water and sanitation development projects</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >384</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.66</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table13" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>3</label><caption><title> Spearman rank correlation test results between the public awareness and education level</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Awareness level of people</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >education level</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Correlation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sig</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Number</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.237</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >384</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table14" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>4</label><caption><title> Spearman rank correlation test results between knowledge level and age</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Awareness level of people</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Age</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Correlation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sig</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Number</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >57%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.266</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >384</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table15" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>5</label><caption><title> Spearman rank correlation results between the awareness of people and job</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Awareness level of people</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Job</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >correlation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sig</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Number</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.122</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.017</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >384</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>due to higher people’s educational level in society, their awareness of Sewerage network and its related installations would be more.</p><p>According to <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>6, Chi-Square amount is 29.313. As sig is 0 that is less than 0.05, there is a significant relationship between people’s awareness and their gender. According to <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>7, awareness amount about sewerage network and its related installations among female respondents was very low among 16%, low 0.48, average in 30.9%, much in 0%, very much 5.1%.</p><p>In addition, awareness level about sewerage network and its related installations among male respondents in 20.1% was very low, in 28.2% was low, in 43.1% was average, in 6.7% was much, in 1.9% was very much. Generally, average level of awareness about sewerage network and its related installations in men is more than women. Also <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref> shows compare the awareness of the sewerage network and its related installations between male and female respondents too.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>Wastewater collection and treatment projects with many advantages, provide accessibility to important goals including protecting the environment, preventing pollution of water resources, development of public health and the reuse of</p><table-wrap id="table16" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>6</label><caption><title> Results of chi-square test (Chi-Square)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Awareness of people</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Gender</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chi-Square</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sig</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Freedom degree</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.313</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table17" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>7</label><caption><title> Frequency and percentage of people awareness based on gender</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"   rowspan="2"  >Gender</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >people awareness level</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Total</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Very low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Much</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Very much</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >175</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >209</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>wastewater in various sectors, especially agriculture. It would be possible by comprehensive planning. The implementation of such plans is inevitable due to psychological impacts and human and society health [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79860-ref9">9</xref>] . In some cases, drainage projects have been implemented without real needs assessments and studies, with high costs. But in practice, good performance is not achieved and installations are gone out of benefit before expiration of benefit life. In some cities due to the lack of a coordinated approach, there is an unbalanced growth in different sectors of sewage plans such as networks implement and construction of sewage treatment plant under assumption attracting clients of wastewater [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79860-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>According to the results, lack of public welcome of wastewater plan due to management problems, social costs, economic costs, cultural costs, lack of informing, lack of satisfaction and trust of citizens of performance of wastewater and water companies, low level of awareness, their familiarity and awareness about wastewater facilities are important points that provide problems in realization of the goals.</p><p>It seems reversal in policy, a review of existing practices in wastewater projects of technical feasibility in terms of economic, social and environmental aspects, as well as implement of methods to increase citizen participation as an important social factor and user of drinking water supply services by water companies by increasing their awareness level of water and wastewater facilities and advantages of implementing wastewater facilities plans and decreasing environmental consequences plays important role in water and sanitation development projects [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79860-ref11">11</xref>] . Training and notifying residents of the city can be effective in the way of creating proper attitudes, thoughts and behaviors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79860-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><p>Citizens as recipients of water and wastewater services are required to increase their awareness of the benefits of implementing sewage projects and reducing environmental impacts through education, in addition to attracting them into participating in the proper implementation and operation of sewage installations. Therefore, it is necessary to adjust the education provided to citizens along with process, structure and integrated program. The hope is that with a scientific look at and fundamental view to the Water and Wastewater Company Mashhad, the field of realization of this wish is provided. Planning for citizenship teaching in order to move from the status quo to the optimal situation requires the gradual formulation and implementation and evaluation of programs in correct and scientific way.</p><p>As all of people acknowledged, cultural development and changing require time and patience. It is essential to apply citizenship training resources for their participation and social mobility of citizens. In this way, it is necessary to use some methods with social acceptance with positive changes adaptable with social cultural environmental criterion. The process of developing a special education program for citizens includes: identifying educational needs, setting educational goals, organizing educational content, selecting techniques and methods of training, identifying required educational resources, preparing lesson plans, preparing tests and methods for measuring the amount of Learn learners, run and administer education and assessment of educational program.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Mohammadi, Z., Lahijanian, A. and Mehrabadi, A.R. (2017) Investigate the Role of Education for In- creasing Citizens’ Awareness in the Im- plementation and Operation of Wastewater Collection System. Open Access Library Journal, 4: e3961 https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1103961</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.79860-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jani Far, H. (2003) A Study on Monitoring and Measuring Program of Customer Satisfaction of Ahvaz Water and Wastewater Company. MA Thesis, Educational Management, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, 5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79860-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mostofi, S. and Bakhtiyari, H. (2006) Problems of Wastewater Projects in Iran. The First National Conference of Operation on Water and Sanitation Sector, Feb 21-23 2006, Tehran, Iran, 124-127.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79860-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Leyli, M. (2010) Municipal Wastewater Management in Developing Countries: Principles and Engineering. Andisheh Rafi, Tehran, 42-44.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79860-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mousavi, G.H. (2011) Wastewater Collection Methods. Hafiz Publication, Tehran, 21 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79860-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bedelians Gholi Kandi, G., et al. (2007) Introduction to the Municipal Sewer Network Administrator. Center for Research and Improve the Efficiency of Water and Wastewater Industry, the Department of Energy, 78 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79860-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mahmoodi, S. (2006) Operation Management of Water and Wastewater in the Country. The first National Conference of Operation on Water and Sanitation Sector, Feb 21-23 2006, Tehran, Iran, 143-146.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79860-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Riyahi Khoram, M. (2005) New Steps in a Fundamental Review of Master Plans for Urban Sewage. Daneshjoo Publications, Hamedan, 46 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79860-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Beygi, F., et al. (2008) Private Sector Participation in the Operation of Water and Wastewater Facilities, Why and How? The Fourth Meeting of the Directors of Water and Wastewater, Oct 17-19 2008, Tehran, Iran, 76-78.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79860-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Singh</surname><given-names> R. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2012</year>)<article-title>Urban Infrastructure Development &amp; Financial Allocation for the Various Urban Development Programms &amp; Schemes in Haryana</article-title><source> IOSR Journal of Humanities &amp; Social Science</source><volume> 4</volume>,<fpage> 31</fpage>-<lpage>35</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79860-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">ABFA (2012) Regulations of Recognize the Competence of the Operation Companies and Maintenance of Wastewater Treatment. Department of Water Affairs and ABFA, Operation System Office ABFA, 56 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79860-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Babakhani, M., et al. (2008) Methods for Calculating the Social Cost of Implementation and Reconstruction of Sewer Network. The Second Conference of Water and Wastewater with Operation Approach, Oct 8-9 2008, Tehran, Iran, 18-19.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79860-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Karimi, D. (2008) Environmental Education and Citizenship Behavior. 9th Edition, Environmental Management Press, Municipality of Tehran, 22 p.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>