<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2017.811186</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-79763</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Preliminary Trial of Cover Cropping and Weed Control for Organic Rice
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gena</surname><given-names>R. Mahato</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Anna</surname><given-names>McClung</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sixte</surname><given-names>Ntamatungiro</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Surendra</surname><given-names>Singh</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Meghnath</surname><given-names>Pokharel</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Vince</surname><given-names>Wiley</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bihu</surname><given-names>Huang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Agriculture, University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff, Pine Bluff, USA</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Kansas State University, Manhattan, USA</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Dale Bumpers National Rice Research Center, Stuttgart, USA</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>huangb@uapb.edu(BH)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>12</day><month>10</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>2758</fpage><lpage>2768</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>12,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>20,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2017</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>23,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The experiment site at UAPB agronomy farm
   
  was left undisturbed for several years for organic rice experiment. Soil samples taken in September 2015 showed that the experiment site was deficient with plant nutrients (NPK). Therefore, an organic fertilizer, Nature (8-5-5) was applied before planting mixture of crimson clover and winter wheat as cover crop in fall 2015. Biomass samples taken from the cover cropped land (CCL) and fallow land (FL) resulted in decrease in weed biomass by 33.36% and increase in total biomass by 46.78% in CCL than FL. Cover crops were incorporated one month before the rice sowing in June 2016. Fifteen rice cultivars were experimented for weed competition under water seeding cultivation method. Water seeding method was not effective to control the weeds as weeds dominated most of the rice plots since seedling stage. However, two rice cultivars namely Jasmine 85 and Rondo showed strong weed competition due to higher plant stand and better seedling establishment.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Organic Farming</kwd><kwd> Water Seeding</kwd><kwd> Flooding</kwd><kwd> Plastic Mulch Covering</kwd><kwd> Weed Pressure</kwd><kwd> Varietal Selection</kwd><kwd> Biomass</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Organic rice has started to gain popularity as the safer and healthier alternative, especially in developed countries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79763-ref1">1</xref>] . Demand for organic rice is increasing with up to 50,000 acres produced in the USA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79763-ref2">2</xref>] . In US, organic rice farmland has increased almost six times since 1995 to now [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79763-ref3">3</xref>] . However, current organic rice production in US is unable to meet the current market demand. Organic rice buyers in the US are importing large percentages of their rice from Cambodia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79763-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>Major challenges in organic rice production include nutrient optimization, weed management and variety selection [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79763-ref5">5</xref>] . Weed competition is one of the prime yield limiting biotic constraints in rice [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79763-ref6">6</xref>] . Uncontrolled weed can reduce rice yield by 44% to 94% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79763-ref7">7</xref>] . Weeds even can cause total crop failure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79763-ref8">8</xref>] . Through selection of weed competitive cultivars, the weed emergence and its subsequent growth can be suppressed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79763-ref9">9</xref>] . Thus, varietal selection can be alternative to weed management in organic rice. Likewise, flooding and cover cropping are tools in integrated weed management for organic rice production. Water seeding of rice is widely practiced in USA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79763-ref7">7</xref>] . In water seeded rice, the field is continuously flooded [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79763-ref10">10</xref>] . Water seeding takes advantage of that by establishing an early water covering to suppress weeds, but continuous flooding in water seeded rice culture encourages aquatic weeds, and when continuous flood is not maintained, it encourages semiaquatic weeds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79763-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>Cover crops provide numerous environmental and weed suppression benefits [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79763-ref11">11</xref>] . The physical and allelopathic effects caused by cover crops residue can be used to suppress the emergence of weed and reduce weed growth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79763-ref12">12</xref>] . Cover crop mixtures provide more effective weed suppression relative to monoculture cover crops [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79763-ref13">13</xref>] because of complementarity function of cover crop species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79763-ref14">14</xref>] . Cover crop mixtures of cereals and legumes are expected to accumulate more biomass than single-species counterparts at similar seeding rates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79763-ref14">14</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><p>The experiment site was planted with winter wheat and crimson clover as cover crop in fall 2015 (Figures 1-3). Above ground cover crop biomass were sampled in April, 2016. Each biomass samples were taken within one meter square area</p><p>with six samples each from cover cropped Land (CCL) and fallow land (FL) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). Cover crop and weed species were separated from each samples and dried biomass of cover crop and weed species were measured (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). Cover crop was incorporated one month before rice sowing.</p><p>In June 2016, fifteen rice cultivars were planted using randomized complete block design with four replications. Water seeded rice and flooding were used as method to control weeds. Seeds were put in the individual cloth bags for varieties and replications then soaked in the water overnight and kept in moisture for two days before planting (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). Soaked seeds were uniformly spread into each small plot (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>). After third week of rice sowing, photographs of each rice plots was taken twice a week for visual scoring of plant stand rating and plot weed pressure of each rice plots and this process was continued till eighth week after rice sowing. Plant stand rating and plot weed pressure measured on each week was computed as average score for each rice cultivar (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig10">Figure 10</xref>). Plant stand rating was measured at scale of 1 - 10 score, where 1 represents 10% plant stand and 10 represents 100% plant stand in a plot. Likewise, Plot weed pressure was measured at scale of 1 - 10 score, where 1 represents 10% plot weed pressure and 10 represents 100% weed pressure.</p><p>Three rice varieties Jasmine 85, Rondo and Presidio were selected for rice</p><p>biomass sampling 80 days after sowing. Biomass samples were taken from three quadrats each with 50 cm &#215; 50 cm within rice plots. Dry biomass of rice and weed in respective rice plots were measured.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Biomass Production from Cover Crop Planting</title><p>Total biomass yield was 483.33 g/m<sup>2</sup> for Cover Crop Land (CCL) and 329.17 g/m<sup>2</sup></p><p>for fallow land (FL), and cover cropping resulted 46.78% increase in total biomass production. Total weeds yield 195.33 g/m<sup>2</sup> for CCL and 242.83 g/m<sup>2</sup> for FL. Cover cropping reduced weed biomass by 33.36% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Of the mixture of cover crop, crimson clover and winter wheat accounted for 59.59% of total biomass in cover cropping land whereas, white clover and crimson clover appeared naturally in fallow land which accounted for 26.33% total biomass (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Plant Stand Rating and Plot Weed Pressure Score of Rice Cultivars</title><p>Out of the fifteen rice varieties, Jasmine 85 and Rondo showed substantial weed competition. Plot weed pressure of Jasmine 85 and Rondo was found comparatively</p><p>lower, 5.75 and 5.0 respectively at rating scale of 0 - 10 score (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>), than other rice varieties. Also, the plant stand rating for Jasmine 85 and Rondo was found higher, 7.75 and 8.75 respectively at rating scale of 0 - 10 score (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>), as compared to other rice varieties. Ark 061 and PI 312777 are allelopathic in nature but these two rice varieties were found to be very less weed competitive with high plot weed pressure, 9.0 in Ark 061 and 9.50 in PI 312777 and low plant stand rating , 2.75 in Ark 061 and 3.50 in PI 312777 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Biomass Production of Selected Rice Cultivars</title><p>The biomass sampling of selected rice varieties resulted in significantly (p = 0.05) higher biomass production from more weed competitive varieties, Jasmine 85 and Rondo than conventional variety Presidio, one of the representative of less weed competitive rice varieties. Likewise, the weed biomass production in respective plots of Jasmine 85 was found significantly lower (p = 0.05) than</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Cover crop and weed biomass production from cover cropping and fallow land</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Treatment</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Biomass production (gm/m<sup>2</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Biomass %</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Total biomass</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Weed</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Cover crop</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Weed</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Cover crop</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Clover</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Winter wheat</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CCL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >483.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >195.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >228.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.59</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >329.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >242.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P (α = 0.05)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0390</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.836</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.037</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Presidio. But the weed biomass obtained from the plots of Rondo and Presidio was not significantly different. This indicates that Rondo is more tolerant to weeds and able to grow despite of incidence of weeds.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Cover crops have higher impact on weed biomass [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79763-ref15">15</xref>] . In this experiment, mixtures of crimson clover and winter wheat produced considerable reduction in weed biomass and increase in total biomass. Crimson clover as a leguminous cover crop provides more organic matter to soil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79763-ref11">11</xref>] and atmospherically fix Nitrogen (77 - 111 kg N/ha) to succeeding crop [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79763-ref16">16</xref>] . Cover crops including</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Plant stand rating and plot weed pressure rating of rice varieties experimented in 2016</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Rice variety</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Plant stand rating (0 - 10)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Plot weed pressure (0 - 10)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ark 061</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cocodrie</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Delrose</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jasmine 85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jazzman</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jazzman 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jupiter</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mermentau</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PI 312777</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Presidio</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rex</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rondo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Roy J</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sierra</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >XL 753</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LSD (α = 0.05)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.21</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>crimson clover as mixture or monoculture can suppress weeds and improve yield, primarily due to biomass effects [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79763-ref14">14</xref>] . Residue from winter annual cover crop provides early-season weed suppression [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79763-ref17">17</xref>] . Likewise, legume cover crop provides weed suppression during active cover growth and just after cover crop termination [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79763-ref18">18</xref>] . On the other hand, because of high C:N ratio in residues of cereal cover crops, the residue of winter wheat after termination can offer increased weed suppression for a relatively longer period of time [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79763-ref19">19</xref>] as cover crop residues left on soil surface suppress weed emergence and growth due to reduced light transmittance and daily soil temperature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79763-ref20">20</xref>] enabling lower initial competition on following crop. This cover cropping trial is limited to study on effect of mixture of crimson clover and winter wheat on weed biomass during growing season and question about effects of this cover crop on weed suppression and crop yield in subsequent organic rice remain unanswered. However, mixture of crimson clover and winter wheat could be successfully be used as integrated weed control alternative in organic farms.</p><p>The use of water seeding in this study to suppress weeds and produce economic yield for organic rice was not successful. Dominantly Cyperus esculentus, Cyperus iria and Echinochloa crusgalli germinated together with rice seedling. These weeds have rapid growth, and they are highly competitive and adapted to aquatic condition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79763-ref7">7</xref>] . Particularly weeds adapted to aquatic condition become more difficult to control by continuous flooding when they are established. However, Moody et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79763-ref21">21</xref>] reported that weed population density and total dry weight per unit area decrease as water depth increases. On the other hand, Sahid and Hossain [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79763-ref22">22</xref>] reported that emergence and survival of some weeds remain unaffected by a flooding depth of 15 cm. Water management is crucial in successful weed control in water seeded rice because flood water affects the density, vigor, and uniformity of rice stands, and severity of weed competition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79763-ref7">7</xref>] . This research in following years will be focused on other alternative methods such as use of plastic mulch covering for weed management in organic rice production.</p><p>The higher weed suppression potential of Jasmine 85 and Rondo observed in the experiment is largely due to higher plant stand and better seedling establishment than other rice varieties. Main characteristics imparting weed competitiveness to rice include selection of cultivars, seeding vigor, early and faster seedling establishment, shoot-root characteristics and self-supportive allelopathy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79763-ref9">9</xref>] . Oluyemi, A.T. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79763-ref23">23</xref>] reported that Jasmine 85 grows rapidly, gives high yield, carries good resistance to pests in Southern United States and also suppresses the growth of weeds in surrounding area. Likewise, Gealy and Yan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79763-ref24">24</xref>] reported that Rondo has high yield potential and ability to suppress or tolerate rice pests, including weeds.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Cover cropping is benefit for weed control and increase rice biomass in the organic rice production. Stronger weed competition varieties, Jasmine 85 and Rondo rice cultivars were found to have substantial weed competition capacity. These two high yielding rice varieties are grown organically in Texas. Therefore, Jasmine 85 and Rondo can be a better varietal choice for organic rice growers.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Mahato, G.R., McClung, A., Ntamatungiro, S., Singh, S., Pokharel, M., Wiley, V. and Huang, B. (2017) Preliminary Trial of Cover Cropping and Weed Control for Organic Rice. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 8, 2758-2768. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2017.811186</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.79763-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bagchi, T.B., Ghosh, A., Kumar, U., Chattopadhyay, K., Sanghamitra, P., Ray, S. and Sharma, S. (2016) Comparison of Nutritional and Physicochemical Quality of Rice Under Organic and Standard Production Systems. Cereal Chemistry, 93, 435-443.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79763-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dou, F., Xin-Gen, Z., McClung, A., McClung, A., Liu, G. and Landry, K. (2012) Developing Sustainable Management Practices for Organic Rice Production. Texas Experiment Station Field Day Handout, 15-16.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79763-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">The Organic Center (2015) Sustainable and Profitable Strategies for IPM in Southern Organic Rice. https://www.organic-center.org/our-projects/sustainable-and-profitable-strategies-for-ipm-in-southern-organic-rice/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79763-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Keller, R. (2013) US Imports Large Volume of Organic Rice. http://www.agprofessional.com/news/US-imports-large-volume-of-organic-rice-201976661.html</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79763-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dou, F., Zhou, X., McClung, A., Storlien, J., Lang, Y., Torbert, A., Hons, F., Wards, B., Kresovich, S. and Wight, J. (2014) Cover Crop, Soil Amendments, and Variety Effects on Organic Rice Production in Texas. Proceedings of 35th Rice Tech. Work. Group Meet., New Orleans, LA, 18-21 February 2014, p. 141.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79763-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sangeetha, C., Velayutham, A., Thavaprakaash, N. and Chinnusamy, C. (2015) Crop Establishment and Weed Management Effects on Rice Productivity and Weed Dynamics. Indian Journal of Weed Science, 47, 6-10.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79763-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ampong-Nyarko, K. and De Datta, S.K. (1991) A Handbook for Weed Control in Rice. IRRI, Manilla.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79763-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Islam, M.J. and Molla, H.R. (2001) Economic Weeding Method for Irrigated Rice Production in Bangladesh. Agricultural Water Management, 46, 267-276.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79763-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dass, A., Shekhawat, K., Choudhary, A.K., Sepat, S., Rathore, S.S., Mahajan, G. and Chauhan, B.S. (2017) Weed Management in Rice Using Crop Competition—A Review. Crop Protection, 95, 45-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.08.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79763-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Linquist, B., Snyder, R., Anderson, F., Espino, L., Inglese, G., Marras, S., Russo, A., et al. (2015) Water Balances and Evapotranspiration in Water- and Dry-Seeded Rice Systems. Irrigation Science, 33, 375-385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-015-0474-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79763-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Price, A.J., Kelton, J. and Mosjidis, J. (2012) Utilization of Sunn Hemp for Cover Crops and Weed Control in Temperate Climates. In: Price, A.J., Ed., Weed Control, InTech.  https://www.intechopen.com/books/weed-control/utilization-of-sunn-hemp-for-cover-crops-and-weed-control-in-temperate-climates</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79763-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fonseca, W.L., de Oliveira Sousa, T., dos Santos, A.S., da Silva Oliveira, J.B., Pacheco, L.P., de Castro Medeiros, L. and de Almeida, F.A. (2016) Influence of Different Cover Crops on the Emergence and Development of ‘Digitariahorizontalis’. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 10, 1244. https://doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.2016.10.09.p7624</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79763-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hayden, Z.D., Brainard, D.C., Henshaw, B. and Ngouajio, M. (2012) Winter Annual Weed Suppression in Rye-Vetch Cover Crop Mixtures. Weed Technology, 26, 818-825. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-12-00084.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79763-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Buchanan, A.L., Kolb, L.N. and Hooks, C.R. (2016) Can Winter Cover Crops Influence Weed Density and Diversity in a Reduced Tillage Vegetable System? Crop Protection, 90, 9-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.08.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79763-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Masilionyte, L., Maiksteniene, S., Kriauciuniene, Z., Jablonskyte-Rasce, D., Zou, L. and Sarauskis, E. (2017) Effect of Cover Crops in Smothering Weeds and Volunteer Plants in Alternative Farming Systems. Crop Protection, 91, 74-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.09.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79763-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">White, C.A., Holmes, H.F., Morris, N.L. and Stobart, R.M. (2016) A Review of the Benefits, Optimal Crop Management Practices and Knowledge Gaps Associated with Different Coper Crop Species. AHDB. Cereals and Oilseeds Research Review. Research Review No. 90. https://cereals.ahdb.org.uk/publications/2016/december/19/a-review-of-the-benefits,-optimal-crop-management-practices-and-knowledge-gaps-associated-with-different-cover-crop-species.aspx</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79763-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Teasdale, J.R. (1996) Contribution of Cover Crops to Weed Management in Sustainable Agricultural Systems. Journal of Production Agriculture, 9, 475-479. https://doi.org/10.2134/jpa1996.0475</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79763-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Reddy, K.N. (2001) Effects of Cereal and Legume Cover Crop Residues on Weeds, Yield, and Net Return in Soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technology, 15, 660-668. https://doi.org/10.1614/0890-037X(2001)015[0660:EOCALC]2.0.CO;2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79763-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cherr, C.M., Scholberg, J.M.S. and McSorley, R. (2006) Green Manure as Nitrogen Source for Sweet Corn in a Warm-Temperate Environment. Agronomy Journal, 98, 1173-1180. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2005.0036</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79763-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Teasdale, J.R. and Mohler, C.L. (1993) Light Transmittance, Soil Temperature, and Soil Moisture under Residue of Hairy Vetch and Rye. Agronomy Journal, 85, 673-680. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1993.00021962008500030029x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79763-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moody, K., De Datta, S.K., Bhan, V.M. and Manna, G.B. (1986) Weed Control in Rainfed Lowland Rice. In: Progressin Rainfed Lowland Rice, IRRI, Philippines, 359-370.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79763-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sahid, I.B. and Hossain, M.S. (1995) The Effects of Flooding and Sowing Depth on the Survival and Growth of Five Rice-Weed Species. Plant Protection Quarterly, 10, 139-142.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79763-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oluyemi, A.T. (2014) Characterisation of Jasmine 85 Rice (Oryza sativa) Variety from Different Sources of Seed Production in Ghana. Doctoral Dissertation, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79763-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gealy, D.R. and Yan, W. (2012) Weed Suppression Potential of ‘Rondo’ and Other Indica Rice Germplasm Lines. Weed Technology, 26, 517-524. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-11-00141.1</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>