<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JEP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Environmental Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2152-2197</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jep.2017.810071</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JEP-79248</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  SO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; Oxidation Efficiency Patterns during an Episode of Plume Transport over Northeast India: Implications to an OH Minimum
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Timmy</surname><given-names>Francis</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Shyam</surname><given-names>Sundar Kundu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ramabadran</surname><given-names>Rengarajan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Arup</surname><given-names>Borgohain</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmedabad, India</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>National Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting, Noida, India</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>North Eastern Space Application Centre, Umiam, India</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>dr.timmyfrancis@gmail.com(TF)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>14</day><month>09</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>10</issue><fpage>1119</fpage><lpage>1143</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>2,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>19,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2017</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>22,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Systematic monitoring of the fluctuations in atmospheric SO
  <sub>2</sub> oxidation efficiency—measured as a molar ratio of SO
  <sub>4</sub>
  <sup style="margin-left:-6px;">2-</sup> to total SOx (SOx=SO2+SO
  <sub>4</sub>
  <sup style="margin-left:-6px;">2-</sup>), referred as S-ratio—have been performed during a major long range plume transport to northeast India (Shillong: 25.67&#176;N, 91.91&#176;E, 1064 m ASL) in March 2009. Anomalously low S-ratios (median, 0.03) were observed during the episode—associated with a cyclonic circulation—and the SO
  <sub>4</sub>
  <sup style="margin-left:-6px;">2-</sup> and SO
  <sub>2</sub> exhibited unusual features in the ‘relative phase’ of their peaks. During initial days, when SO
  <sub>2</sub> levels were dictated by the long range influx, the SO
  <sub>4</sub>
  <sup style="margin-left:-6px;">2-</sup> and SO
  <sub>2</sub> variabilities were in anti-phase—for the differing mobility/loss mechanisms. When SO
  <sub>2</sub> levels were governed by the boundary layer diurnality in the latter days, the anti-phase is explained by a ‘depleted OH level’—major portion being consumed in the initial period by the elevated SO
  <sub>2</sub> and other pollutants. Simulations with a global 3D chemical transport model, GEOS-Chem (v8-03-01), also indicated ‘suppressed oxidation conditions’—with characteristic low S-ratios and poor phase agreements. The modelled OH decreased steadily from the initial days, and OH normalized to SO
  <sub>2</sub>—referred as OH
  <sub>specific</sub>—was consistently low during the ‘suppressed S-ratio period’. Further, the geographical distribution of modelled OH showed a pronounced minimum over the region surrounding (20&#176;N, 95&#176;E) spanning parts of northeast India and the adjacent regions to the southeast of it—prevalent throughout the year, though the magnitude and the area of influence have a seasonality to it—with significant implications for reducing the oxidizing power of the regional atmosphere. A second set of measurements during January 2010—when prominent long range transports were absent—exhibited no anomalies, and the S-ratios were well within the acceptable limits (median, 0.32). This work highlights the GEOS-Chem model skill in simulating/detecting the ‘transient fluctuations’ in the oxidation efficiency, down to a regional scale.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Sulphur Dioxide</kwd><kwd> Sulphate</kwd><kwd> Atmospheric Oxidation</kwd><kwd> GEOS-Chem</kwd><kwd> OH Radical</kwd><kwd> Plume Transport</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Hydroxyl (OH) radicals many a time are aptly called ‘detergent of the atmosphere’, for the photochemical reactions initiated by them play crucial roles in the oxidation of huge quantities of natural and anthropogenic gases. The primary source of OH in any unpolluted lower tropospheric region is the photolysis of ozone, and a subsequent reaction with water vapour [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref1">1</xref>] . Secondary OH sources also exist in the troposphere, and the recycling of HO<sub>2</sub> mainly by reaction with NO and O<sub>3</sub>, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref2">2</xref>] is the prominent one.</p><p>Fluctuations in photolysis rate, relative humidity (RH) and ozone abundance can strongly affect the OH production, sometimes causing ‘transient changes in the oxidation capacity’ of atmosphere on a regional scale. The very short life times of OH for a high reactivity with carbon monoxide (CO) and hydrocarbons, especially methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref5">5</xref>] , makes its concentration levels heavily dependent on the source and sink.</p><p>This paper reports an instance of ‘suppressed oxidation condition’ in the local atmosphere during a major plume transport episode detected [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref6">6</xref>] at our sampling site, Shillong, in north-east India―resulting in an anomalously low SO<sub>2</sub> to SO 4 2 − conversion rate. While the molar ratio of SO 4 2 − to total SO<sub>x</sub> ( SO x = SO 2 + SO 4 2 − ), termed S-ratio, can be a good measure of the formation efficiency of SO 4 2 − in the atmosphere [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref7">7</xref>] , its variability is directly linked to the OH radical concentrations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref9">9</xref>] along with other factors such as boundary layer height, long range transport, dry deposition rate etc. The observations have been further compared with simulations employing a global 3D model of tropospheric chemistry, GEOS-Chem (v8-03-01).</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Site Description</title><p>The sampling site, Shillong (25.67˚N, 91.91˚E, 1064 m ASL), located in the North-Eastern part of India, is characterized by a high annual rainfall (~2200 mm). While the high precipitation help retain a clean atmosphere via wet scavenging, occasional long range transport of pollutants many a time shows up clearly over the background in the atmospheric trace gas and aerosol measurements [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref10">10</xref>] , making it an ideal site for studying long range pollution transport episodes. Its latitudinal location and high elevation provide it with a subtropical climate with mild summers and chilly to cold winters. The monsoon arrives by June and rains almost until the end of August, with low intensity precipitations sometimes showing up on either side of these months. The window of opportunity for most of the aerosol and trace gas measurements at this region is Jan - Mar every year, when hardly any precipitation occurs.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Experimental Setup</title><p>For the ambient SO<sub>2</sub> measurements, a primary UV fluorescence SO<sub>2</sub> monitor (Thermo-43i TLE) with a lower detection limit of 0.05 ppbv was used (see http://www.thermoscientific.com/content/tfs/en/product/enhanced-trace-level-so-sub-2-sub-analyzer-model-43-i-i-i-tle.html ). Also see, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref13">13</xref>] for detailed evaluations of similar systems. The dynamic gas calibrator (Thermo-146i) fed with a standard SO<sub>2</sub> gas (2 ppmv with N<sub>2</sub> balance gas, Spectra, USA) facilitated the routine onsite calibrations. See [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref6">6</xref>] for an elaborate discussion on the instrumentation aspects of the SO<sub>2</sub> monitoring.</p><p>The experimental setup for the SO 4 2 − measurements comprised periodic collection of fine mode aerosol samples using a high volume air sampler (Thermo) and the subsequent measurement of inorganic anions via ion chromatography. The aerosol samples (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) were collected on Whatman cellulose filters (200 &#215; 250 mm<sup>2</sup>) loaded in the air sampler (flow rate, 1.12 m<sup>3</sup>/min). In general, the procedure involved collecting two aerosol samples (sampling duration ~6 hrs) during daytime and one sample (sampling duration ~12 hrs) during night time. A quarter section of each filter was then soaked in 50 mL Milli-Q water (18.2 MΩ resistivity) for 4 hrs with ultrasonication performed for 20 minutes (in steps of 5 minutes). This procedure essentially extracts all the water soluble ionic species (WSIS) from the filter. The water extract is then passed though an ion chromatograph (Dionex, Model 2000i/SP with CDM-3 conductivity detector, see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref15">15</xref>] for a detailed discussion of the system) to measure the inorganic anions (Cl<sup>−</sup>, NO 3 − and SO 4 2 − ). The system employs Ionpac AS14A analytical column and AG14A guard column, in conjunction with an anion self-regenerating suppressor (ASRS) in recycle mode, using 8.0 mM Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> - 1.0 mM NaHCO<sub>3</sub> as eluent to separate the anions. The measured values were then further corrected for procedural blanks (comprising blank filters and analytical reagents).</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. GEOS-Chem Model</title><p>The GEOS-Chem global 3-dimensional chemical transport model (v8-03-01;  http://acmg.seas.harvard.edu/geos/ ) with HO<sub>x</sub>-NO<sub>x</sub>-VOC-ozone chemistry [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref17">17</xref>] have been employed for this study. For the present simulations, the model employed GEOS-5 assimilated meteorology having a temporal resolution of 6-h (3-hour resolution for surface fields and mixing depths) and a horizontal resolution of 0.5˚ latitude &#215; 0.667˚ longitude, with 72 vertical levels, regridded to 4˚ &#215; 5˚. The elaborate model evaluations can be found in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref20">20</xref>] . See, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref21">21</xref>] for the aerosol sources and processes, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref22">22</xref>] for modifications related to dust and sea salt, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref23">23</xref>] for the wet deposition of soluble aerosols and gases, and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref24">24</xref>] for dry deposition via the standard resistance-in-series scheme.</p><p>The model spin up time was kept sufficiently long (12 months, from Jan 2008 to Jan 2009) to remove any influence of initial conditions. The simulations were then performed for Jan 2009 - Apr 2010 at 4˚ &#215; 5˚ resolutions with the standard input.geos file (unless mentioned otherwise) distributed with the GEOS-Chem codes (v8-03-01), that define the input parameters and emission inventories-EMEP [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref25">25</xref>] , BRAVO [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref26">26</xref>] , EDGAR [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref27">27</xref>] , Streets inventory [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref28">28</xref>] , CAC (  http://wiki.seas.harvard.edu/geos-chem/index.php/CAC_anthropogenic_emissions ), and EPA/NEI05. The ND49 diagnostics were turned ON in the model to generate the time series data of the various species. The primary analysis of the model outputs were performed with the global atmospheric model analysis package (GAMAP) (Version 2.15;  http://acmg.seas.harvard.edu/gamap /).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussions</title><p>Simultaneous measurements of ambient SO 4 2 − and SO<sub>2</sub> were made during a major plume transport episode detected at our sampling site, Shillong, in March 2009. The transient changes in the atmospheric conditions that lead to the plume transport―measured peak SO<sub>2</sub> concentrations of up to 262.3 ppbv―from source regions in Perm, Russia are elaborated in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref6">6</xref>] . He proposed the event to link with a major cold air outbreak and an associated cyclonic circulation, preceding one of the dust storm events reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref29">29</xref>] in China. The arguments were formulated on the basis of the HYSPLIT [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref30">30</xref>] analysis―which showed drastic wind trajectory changes for the period wherein the back trajectories were seen extending to the SO<sub>2</sub>, SO 4 2 − hot spot regions in Perm, Russia―and model simulations using GEOS-Chem (v8-03-01)―that showed tropospheric SO<sub>2</sub> over Perm peaking during Nov, Dec, Jan, Feb and Mar, possibly due to central heating (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>, in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref6">6</xref>] ).</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows the HYSPLIT air mass back trajectory matrices for the period, depicting the transient changes in the atmospheric circulation patterns linked with the cold air outbreak and the associated cyclonic circulation that led to the long range plume transport episode. Elaborate discussion on the back trajectory analysis for the period could be found in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref6">6</xref>] wherein the analysis showed that between 8<sup>th</sup> and 15<sup>th</sup>March, the winds which were traveling in the eastward direction suddenly underwent a transient bending and traveled towards North- East till ~60˚N and from there it again got bend towards the south to reach the sampling site. The daily variations in the meteorological parameters (wind speed &amp; wind direction, relative humidity and atmospheric pressure) recorded by an automated weather station (AWS) near the sampling site (except for a small non-operational period from 20 - 23<sup>rd</sup> March 2009) are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. The wind direction mostly remained South-East with the second directional preference for South-West. A transient increase in wind speed was observed between 9<sup>th</sup> and 13<sup>th</sup> March 2009. Relative humidity (RH) was high throughout the sampling period with a small dip between 10<sup>th</sup> and 12<sup>th</sup> followed by two spikes each on 13<sup>th</sup> and 14<sup>th</sup>. Atmospheric pressure had been unusually fluctuating with a dip during 3<sup>rd</sup> to 7<sup>th</sup> (lowest value 891 hPa) and a hump between 12<sup>th</sup> and 15<sup>th</sup> March (Max. value 903.3 hPa).</p><p>Anomalous features seen in the S-ratios―the molar ratio of SO 4 2 − to total SO<sub>x</sub> ( SO x = SO 2 + SO 4 2 − ), an indicator of the oxidation efficiency of SO<sub>2</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref9">9</xref>] ―during this plume transport episode is the theme of this paper and a further comparison is made with measurements in January 2010―when no such long range transports prevailed.</p><p>Towards this, the sulphate ( SO 4 2 − ) accumulated in the aerosol samples (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) collected in periodic intervals were measured on the Dionex Ion Chromatograph. The median SO<sub>2</sub> concentrations for the corresponding intervals also were obtained from the time series SO<sub>2</sub> data [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref6">6</xref>] . The S-ratios for the different sampling intervals were then calculated as:</p><p>S-ratio = [ SO 4 2 − ] / ( [ SO 2 ] + [ SO 4 2 − ] ) (1)</p><p>The median S-ratio for the month is then calculated from the S-ratios for the different intervals.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. S O 4 2 − and SO<sub>2</sub> Variabilities in March 2009: The S-ratio Anomaly</title><p>When the transient long range transport brought SO<sub>2</sub> plumes to the sampling site, the S-ratios, derived from time series SO 4 2 − and SO<sub>2</sub> measurements, were seen to be unusually low (median value, 0.03). The anomalous SO<sub>2</sub> oxidation efficiency patterns can be very well seen in the time series S-ratios for the different sampling intervals (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>), which showed a dip during 11<sup>th</sup> and 12<sup>th</sup> March</p><p>2009 followed by a steady ascend to reach its maximum through to 20<sup>th</sup> followed by a decrease. The lowest ratio recorded was 0.008 (at 0159 hrs, 12<sup>th</sup> Mar) and the highest was 0.11 (at 1620 hrs, 20<sup>th</sup> Mar). Throughout this sampling, the S-ratios remained anomalously low.</p><p>Similarly, the measured time series SO<sub>2</sub> and SO 4 2 − (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>) exhibited many unusual features. During 9<sup>th</sup>, 10<sup>th</sup> and 11<sup>th</sup> March, the SO<sub>2</sub> variability was governed predominantly by long range transport influx with minimal planetary boundary layer (PBL) height diurnality influence. An interesting observation for these days is that the SO<sub>2</sub> and SO 4 2 − peaks were almost in anti-phase with each other, which may be attributed to the differing mobility pattern and loss mechanisms for SO<sub>2</sub> (gas) and SO 4 2 − (particulate matter), to result in apparent transit time/concentration mismatches in reaching the sampling site.</p><p>Observations similar to the one here―viz., ‘the poor SO 2 -SO 4 2 − correlations/phase-agreements in long range transported air masses’―were reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref9">9</xref>] when plumes from an accidental oil fire event [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref31">31</xref>] were detected at their high altitude sampling site Mt. Abu, India, and had then projected the scope for further systematic simulation/field studies on the topic.</p><p>From 12<sup>th</sup> March onwards, the SO<sub>2</sub> variability is seen to have a more PBL height diurnality influence. During 12<sup>th</sup> to 20<sup>th</sup> also, the SO<sub>2</sub> and SO 4 2 − peaks are in anti-phase, and may be explained by a non-availability of sufficient</p><p>enough OH radicals, which were possibly heavily utilized for the oxidation of large amounts of SO<sub>2</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref6">6</xref>] and other pollutants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref10">10</xref>] in the initial days, to lead to a ‘suppressed oxidation condition’ for the local atmosphere―as evidenced by the anomalously low S-ratios.</p><p>During 21<sup>st</sup> to 26<sup>th</sup>, when SO<sub>2</sub> reduced significantly compared to the initial sampling days, the SO<sub>2</sub> and SO 4 2 − time series variations came in-phase with each other indicating the initiation of a regain of the oxidizing power of the atmosphere via a buildup of sufficient OH.</p>S-ratio Dependence on SO<sub>2</sub> Levels<p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> depicts the S-ratio variabilities as a function of SO<sub>2</sub> during the different sampling intervals in March 2009. The ratio is seen to be high at low SO<sub>2</sub> concentrations and decreased monotonically with increasing SO<sub>2</sub>, asymptotically approaching a value of 0.01 at high SO<sub>2</sub> concentrations―an observation quite similar to the one reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref32">32</xref>] . But they reported the S-ratio to asymptotically approach a value of 0.1 at high SO<sub>2</sub> concentrations and suggested such a behavior to be consistent with a conversion of about 10% of the fuel sulphur to SO 4 2 − in the source region followed by (1) oxidation of the SO<sub>2</sub> to SO 4 2 − as the plume transported downwind (2) dilution of the plume with air containing a high fraction of the sulphur present as SO 4 2 − or (3) a combination of these two processes.</p><p>To further explore the notion of ‘suppressed oxidation condition’ over the sampling region and assess the factors contributed to the anomalous low S-</p><p>ratios, simulation studies with the chemical transport model also were performed, and is detailed below.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. GEOS-Chem Simulation Studies</title><p>The GEOS-Chem (v8-03-01) runs were performed with the inventories discussed previously―employing the standard input.geos file―to generate time series SO<sub>2</sub> and SO 4 2 − for the 4˚ &#215; 5˚ grid cell containing the sampling site, and the S-ratios were derived for March 2009. Similar to the experimental observations, the simulations also showed anomalous low S-ratios during 10<sup>th</sup> to 16<sup>th</sup> March, and the time series SO<sub>2</sub> and SO 4 2 − variabilities exhibited poor phase agreement (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>).</p><p>To study the scenario further, time series OH radicals were generated (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>), from the model by turning ON the ND49 diagnostics. The OH decreased steadily from 7<sup>th</sup> March 2009 to reach the lowest of the month on 16<sup>th</sup>, followed by an ascend. Further, the time series OH normalized to time series SO<sub>2</sub>, referred here as OH<sub>specific</sub> gave ‘consistently suppressed values’ during 10<sup>th</sup> to 16<sup>th</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>), thus explaining the observed ‘S-ratio anomaly’ for the period.</p><p>Having seen ‘suppressed oxidation conditions’ in both experiments and simulations, it is worth assessing the contributions from factors such as ‘Transport’, ‘dry deposition’ and ‘dust load’ to the scenario. Sensitivity simulations―similar to the ones performed by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref9">9</xref>] ―can help resolve some of these factors and are detailed in the following sections 3.2.1 to 3.2.3. From these, the</p><p>effect of switching OFF different ‘processes’ on the SO<sub>2</sub>, SO 4 2 − , and S-ratios are assessed via the equation:</p><p>Δ Species ( process ) = ( Species ' − Species ) / Species &#215; 100 % (2)</p><p>where:</p><p>ΔSpecies<sub>(</sub><sub>process)</sub> = Percent Difference in Species concentration/value in the absence of the ‘Process’</p><p>Species = Species concentration/value from the baseline run employing the standard input.geos file</p><p>Species' = Species concentration/value from the sensitivity run with the particular ‘process’ turned OFF</p><p>The ‘Species’ mentioned here are SO<sub>2</sub>, SO 4 2 − , and S-ratio respectively.</p><sec id="s3_2_1"><title>3.2.1. Effect of Transport on the S-ratio Anomaly</title><p>To assess the role of transport on the anomalous low S-ratios and poor SO 2 -SO 4 2 − phase agreements, sensitivity simulations were performed with ‘Transport OFF’. The ‘percent difference in SO<sub>2</sub>, SO 4 2 − , and S-ratios in the absence of transport’ (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>) for the GEOS-Chem 4˚ &#215; 5˚ grid cell containing the sampling site, termed ΔSO<sub>2(Transport)</sub>, Δ SO 4 2 − ( Transport ) and ΔS-ratio<sub>(Transport)</sub> respectively are then obtained via the Equation (2). Here, the ‘process’ in the equation is ‘Transport’.</p><p>The ΔSO<sub>2(</sub><sub>Transport)</sub> showed negative values during 3<sup>rd</sup> to 11<sup>th</sup> March ’09 with the lowest on 8<sup>th</sup> (except for a slight increase on 9<sup>th</sup>). This suggests the prominent ‘long range transported SO<sub>2</sub> presence’ over the sampling region during 3<sup>rd</sup> to 11<sup>th</sup>, supporting the observations of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref6">6</xref>] . It then increased (switched to positive) during 12<sup>th</sup> to 15<sup>th</sup> March, possibly suggesting an ‘accumulation’ of long range transported SO<sub>2</sub> over the sampling region in the ‘absence of transport’. The Δ SO 4 2 − ( Transport ) also decreased during 3<sup>rd</sup> to 11<sup>th</sup> March (except for the slight increase on 9<sup>th</sup> and 10<sup>th</sup>) with minimal diurnal fluctuations. The values then increased from 12<sup>th</sup> March, giving a peak between 12<sup>th</sup> and 16<sup>th</sup>―indicating that</p><p>the transport significantly reduced the SO 4 2 − levels over the sampling region during this period, possibly attributed to the enhanced presence of other pollutants including CO and NO<sub>x</sub> competing for the available OH and hence reducing the SO<sub>2</sub> oxidation rate as will be detailed in Section 3.2.4.―and the enhancements were much more pronounced than that of ΔSO<sub>2(Transport)</sub>. The diurnal fluctuations in Δ SO 4 2 − ( Transport ) during these days were very minimal. The ΔS-ratio<sub>(Transport)</sub> showed a major enhancement during 10<sup>th</sup> - 16<sup>th</sup> March suggesting that the ‘Transport’ caused significant reductions in the S-ratios (max: 114%, on 13<sup>th</sup> March), during these days due to the enhanced presence of SO<sub>2</sub> compared to SO 4 2 − when ‘Transport is ON’―explained by the OH deficiency, for the high pollutant levels.</p><p>The predominant presence of SO<sub>2</sub> compared to SO 4 2 − in the model predictions are similar to the experimental observations and support the arguments of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref6">6</xref>] ―viz. the ‘enhanced transport’ of SO<sub>2</sub> containing plumes, associated with the cold air outbreak and dust storm events [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref33">33</xref>] , has contributed to the high SO<sub>2</sub> levels. Also this sensitivity simulation supports the notion that ‘ SO 2 -SO 4 2 − anti-phase in the initial days were governed by the long range transport patterns’ of the two species, with their ‘relative transit-time/loss-mechanism mismatches’ being a prominent factor.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_2"><title>3.2.2. Effect of Dry Deposition on the S-ratio Anomaly</title><p>Dry deposition is known to play major roles in the removal of air pollutants from atmosphere [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref34">34</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref41">41</xref>] . To study the effect of dry deposition on the poor SO 2 -SO 4 2 − phase agreements and anomalous low S-ratios, sensitivity simulations were performed with ‘Dry Deposition OFF’. The ‘percent difference in SO<sub>2</sub>, SO 4 2 − , and S-ratios in the absence of Dry Deposition’ (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0) for the 4˚ &#215; 5˚ grid cell, termed ΔSO<sub>2(</sub><sub>DryDeposition</sub><sub>)</sub>, Δ SO 4 2 − ( DryDeposition ) and ΔS-ratio<sub>(DryDeposition)</sub> respectively, are then obtained via the Equation (2). Here, the ‘process’ in the equation is ‘Dry Deposition’.</p><p>The ΔSO<sub>2(</sub><sub>DryDeposition</sub><sub>)</sub> gave only positive values throughout March 2009, but with varying magnitudes. During 10<sup>th</sup> to 15<sup>th</sup>, it showed very minimal diurnal variation and the dry deposition losses were among the lowest of the month. The Δ SO 4 2 − ( DryDeposition ) gave both positive and negative values. During 3<sup>rd</sup> to 9<sup>th</sup> March the values were negative, with the lowest on 3<sup>rd</sup> and 4<sup>th</sup> showing the prominent ‘dry deposition’ effects in enhancing the SO 4 2 − during this period―possibly attributed to the enhanced levels of other pollutant gases in the absence of dry deposition, competing for the available OH and hence reducing its availability for SO<sub>2</sub> oxidation. The Δ SO 4 2 − ( DryDeposition ) switched to positive during 11<sup>th</sup> - 14<sup>th</sup> March with the peak on 11<sup>th</sup> and 12<sup>th</sup> and exhibited minimal diurnal fluctuations. In other words, during these days the ‘dry deposition’ significantly reduced the SO 4 2 − concentration. The ΔS-ratio<sub>(DryDeposition)</sub> remained mostly negative throughout March 2009, indicating that the ‘dry deposition’ has been enhancing the S-ratio―as suggested by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref8">8</xref>] , that when dry deposition losses are minimized, an enhanced retention time for SO<sub>2</sub> can lead to efficient oxidation to SO 4 2 − .</p><p>During 3<sup>rd</sup> to 9<sup>th</sup> March, the S-ratio enhancement due to ‘dry deposition’ is among the highest of the month. The ΔS-ratio<sub>(</sub><sub>DryDeposition</sub><sub>)</sub> increased (less negative) during 10<sup>th</sup> to 14<sup>th</sup> with values touching almost zero (on 11<sup>th</sup> March). In other words, during this period the S-ratio enhancements due to ‘dry deposition’ were very minimal. This may be explained as follows. In the absence of dry deposition, the enhanced retention time of SO<sub>2</sub> is expected to enhance the SO 4 2 − formation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref8">8</xref>] via the oxidation by OH. But since the OH<sub>specific</sub> values for this period is very low the oxidation efficiency is very minimal, and so the enhancement in SO 4 2 − via the oxidation process is negligible even while the dry deposition is switched OFF.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_3"><title>3.2.3. Effect of Dust Load on the S-ratio Anomaly</title><p>The sampling period in March 2009 had witnessed occasional rise in the atmospheric dust load [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref33">33</xref>] . It is known that reactions with mineral particles influence sulphur budgets downwind dust source regions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref42">42</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref43">43</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref44">44</xref>] . In order to assess the ‘dust load’ factor in the OH levels and photochemical activity, sensitivity simulations were performed with ‘dust emission OFF’. The ‘percent difference in SO<sub>2</sub>, SO 4 2 − , and S-ratios in the absence of Dust Emission’ (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1), termed ΔSO<sub>2(</sub><sub>DustEmission</sub><sub>)</sub>, Δ SO 4 2 − ( DustEmission ) and ΔS-ra- tio<sub>(DustEmission)</sub> respectively, are then obtained via the equation (2). Here, the ‘process’ is ‘Dust Emission’.</p><p>The ΔSO<sub>2(</sub><sub>DustEmission</sub><sub>)</sub> mostly gave positive values except for the two negative spikes each on 5<sup>th</sup> and 6<sup>th</sup> March. Many positive spikes with diurnal variability were seen during 7<sup>th</sup> to 12<sup>th</sup>, with the most prominent one on 10<sup>th</sup> March, implying that the dust emission has been pulling down the SO<sub>2</sub> levels during these</p><p>days. During 13<sup>th</sup> to 15<sup>th</sup>, the ΔSO<sub>2(</sub><sub>Dust Emission)</sub> again showed minimal spikes (in the positive direction). The Δ SO 4 2 − ( DustEmission ) showed a prominent negative spike on 7<sup>th</sup> March. It mostly gave negative values with the lowest (most negative) seen during 10<sup>th</sup> and 11<sup>th</sup>―viz., the dust emission helped enhance the SO 4 2 − levels during these days―followed by a steady ascend to reach near zero values by 14<sup>th</sup>. The ΔS-ratio<sub>(</sub><sub>DustEmission</sub><sub>)</sub> more or less followed the Δ SO 4 2 − ( DustEmission ) variability pattern. ΔS-ratio<sub>(</sub><sub>DustEmission</sub><sub>)</sub> mostly gave negative values with the lowest values seen on 10<sup>th</sup> and 11<sup>th</sup> March (min: −1.75%) followed by a steady ascend to reach near zero by 14<sup>th</sup>. In other words, the ‘dust emission’ enhanced the S-ratios during 10<sup>th</sup> and 11<sup>th</sup>, which then reduced to near zero by 14<sup>th</sup> March.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_4"><title>3.2.4. The Role of CO and NO<sub>x</sub> on the S-ratio Anomaly</title><p>Based on projections from photochemical box model studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref45">45</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref51">51</xref>] , the various possible scenarios arising out of low/high NO<sub>x</sub> conditions to the OH availability in a polluted atmosphere are vividly discussed in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref2">2</xref>] . They forecast ‘poor OH recycling efficiencies’ to prevail under depleted NO<sub>x</sub> and elevated CO and CH<sub>4</sub> concentrations. On the contrary the system would go autocatalytic at high NO<sub>x</sub> conditions when the OH recycling is quite efficient, leading to a runaway of oxidants. Also, they projected that the high NO<sub>x</sub> system leads to unstable conditions and that short periods with high (initially autocatalytic) OH formation were to follow long periods of OH suppression.</p><p>To assess the possible roles by the CO and NO<sub>x</sub> in the anomalous OH fluctuations―and hence to the poor S-ratios―time series concentrations of these species were obtained from the model along with time series PBL (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2) via</p><p>the ND49 diagnostics. The NO<sub>x</sub> showed a dip on 10<sup>th</sup> March which coincided with the triggering of ‘below threshold OH<sub>specific</sub>’, while the CO remained high especially during the days preceding 10<sup>th</sup> March (the percentage reduction in the night time CO on 10<sup>th</sup> March was less significant when compared to those of NO<sub>x</sub>)―a scenario quite similar to the one mentioned in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref2">2</xref>] . The night time dip in NO<sub>x</sub> and CO on 10<sup>th</sup> March also coincided with a higher night time PBL on the 10<sup>th</sup>. The depleted NO<sub>x</sub> on 10<sup>th</sup> could have triggered a ‘period of poor OH recycling’ efficiency which when coincided a high SO<sub>2</sub> influx from the long range transport, possibly contributed, at least in part, to the ‘period of OH suppression’ and to the anomalous low S-ratios.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. An OH Minimum in NE India and the Neighboring Region</title><p>The degree of temporal and spatial variability of tropospheric OH and its effects on the species life time has been a topic of debate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref52">52</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref57">57</xref>] . In the wake of the very limited direct OH radical measurements available for the region, GEOS-Chem model simulations can help provide significant insights into the geographical distribution pattern of OH.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3 shows the mean OH concentrations for different months of the year 2009, from the GEOS-Chem model. A clear OH minimum is seen over the region surrounding (20˚N, 95˚E) spanning parts of the north-east India and the adjacent regions to the south-east of it. This minimum is prevalent throughout</p><p>the year, though the magnitude and the area of influence have a seasonality to it. This model prediction of an OH minimum can have significant implications to the present understanding on the oxidizing power of the regional atmosphere and hence on the air quality, especially during the long range pollution transport episodes associated with spring time cold air outbreaks. For example, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref58">58</xref>] from their model studies showed that an ‘OH minimum’ in west Pacific could reduce the upper free tropospheric aerosol surface area density by up to 25% (due to less efficient conversion of SO<sub>2</sub> into sulphate), while that in the lowermost stratosphere increase by more than 5% (due to increased SO<sub>2</sub> transport into the stratosphere and conversion into sulphate at higher altitudes).</p><p>It is clear that the OH minimum conditions reflected in the model simulations, for the region, could well be the possible explanation for the suppressed S-ratio values during the plume transport episode in March 2009. The ‘OH minimum’ in the model simulations along with the ‘anomalous low S-ratios’ in the field measurements, underlines the impending need for systematic field measurements of OH in north-east India and the adjoining regions―in the wake of the region’s growing anthropogenic emissions.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. S O 4 2 − , SO<sub>2</sub>, and S-ratio Variabilities in January 2010</title><p>The simultaneous measurements of ambient SO<sub>2</sub> and SO 4 2 − were again performed at our sampling site, in January 2010. This sampling period didn’t see any major long range transports [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref6">6</xref>] and the air mass back trajectories extended mostly to the Indo-Gangetic plane (figures not shown). For this month, no any kind of anomalies were seen in the SO<sub>2</sub> oxidation efficiencies, and the S-ratios (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>4) were well within the acceptable limits, with a monthly median value of 0.32. The S-ratio values for this month are comparable to those reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref9">9</xref>] , for their western Indian site, Mt. Abu. A very good phase-agreement is seen between the SO<sub>2</sub> and SO 4 2 − time series during the different sampling intervals for this month.</p><p>This observation of an in-phase varying time series SO 2 -SO 4 2 − and a monthly median S-ratio value on par with those reported from western India [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref9">9</xref>] , would possibly imply that under the present local emission conditions of the region, the oxidizing power of the regional atmosphere is still somewhat sufficient to have normal oxidation rates for the trace gases including SO<sub>2</sub>, which becomes insufficient during major long range pollution transport episodes―peaking in the spring time [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79248-ref10">10</xref>] when cold air outbreaks cause significant pollutant transport from far flung regions.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>We have reported an instance of ‘suppression in atmospheric SO<sub>2</sub> oxidation efficiency’ during a major plume transport episode detected at our sampling site Shillong (25.67˚N, 91.91˚E, 1064 m ASL). Anomalously low S-ratios (median, 0.03) were observed in the field measurements during the episode in March 2009</p><p>and the time series SO 4 2 − and SO<sub>2</sub> exhibited unusual features in the ‘relative phase’ of their peaks. During the initial days, when SO<sub>2</sub> levels were dictated primarily by the long range transport influx (viz. high SO<sub>2</sub> levels even during the high PBL conditions in daytime), the SO 4 2 − and SO<sub>2</sub> variabilities were almost in anti-phase―which has been attributed to the differing mobility patterns and loss mechanisms for the two species. When SO<sub>2</sub> was governed primarily by the PBL effects in the latter days (viz. low (high) SO<sub>2</sub> levels during day (night) time when PBL is high (low)), the anti-phase is explained by a ‘depleted OH level’―a major portion of which were possibly consumed in the initial days for the oxidation of large amounts of SO<sub>2</sub> and other pollutants.</p><p>Simulations employing the GEOS-Chem (v8-03-01) model, also showed suppressed oxidation conditions during 10<sup>th</sup> to 16<sup>th</sup> March 2009, with characteristic low S-ratios and poor SO 2 -SO 4 2 − phase agreements, which are explained by a steadily decreasing OH from 7<sup>th</sup> to 16<sup>th</sup>. Further, the OH normalized to SO<sub>2</sub>, referred as OH<sub>specific</sub>, was consistently low during the above days. The contributions from ‘Transport’, ‘Dry Deposition’ and ‘Dust Emission’ to the suppressed oxidizing conditions were also assessed through sensitivity simulations. The ‘Transport’ caused major reductions in the S-ratio (max: 114%, on 13<sup>th</sup>) during 10<sup>th</sup> to 16<sup>th</sup> March. The ‘dust emission’ is seen to boost the S-ratios by up to 1.75% (during 10<sup>th</sup> and 11<sup>th</sup>). The time series NO<sub>x</sub> from the model showed a dip on 10<sup>th</sup> March which coincided with the triggering of ‘below threshold OH<sub>specific</sub>’, while the CO remained high―a scenario which could have possibly helped, at least in part, trigger a ‘poor OH recycling efficiency’. The geographical distribution pattern of OH from the GEOS-Chem model showed a pronounced minimum over the region surrounding (20˚N, 95˚E) spanning parts of northeast India and the adjacent regions to the southeast of it―prevalent throughout the year, though the magnitude and the area of influence have a seasonality to it―with significant implications to reducing the oxidizing power of the regional atmosphere. A second set of SO<sub>2</sub> and SO 4 2 − field measurements during January 2010―when no major long range transports prevailed―showed no any kind of the anomalies of the former sampling month and the S-ratios were well within the acceptable limits, with a monthly median value of 0.32. These observations possibly imply that under the present local emission conditions of the region, the oxidizing power of the regional atmosphere is still somewhat sufficient to have normal oxidation rates for the pollutant gases, while the OH become insufficient during major long range pollution transport episodes―peaking during the spring time when cold air outbreaks cause air mass transport from far flung regions.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The ISRO-Geosphere Biosphere Program (Department of Space, Government of India) is gratefully acknowledged for the partial financial support for this study. The authors are highly grateful to Prof. M. M. Sarin, Physical Research Laboratory, India, for the invaluable scientific discussions and support towards this study.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Francis, T., Kundu, S.S., Rengarajan, R. and Borgohain, A. (2017) SO<sub>2</sub> Oxidation Efficiency Patterns during an Episode of Plume Transport over Northeast India: Implications to an OH Minimum. Journal of Environmental Protection, 8, 1119-1143. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2017.810071</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.79248-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Levy, H. (1971) Normal Atmosphere: Large Radical and Formaldehyde Concentrations Predicted. Science, 173, 141-143. &lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1126/science.173.3992.141</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lelieveld, J., Peters, W., Dentener, F.J. and Krol, M.C. (2002) Stability of Tropospheric Hydroxyl Chemistry. Journal of Geophysical Research, 107, 4715. 
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002272</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McConnell, J.C., McElroy, M.B. and Wofsy, S.C. (1971) Natural Sources of Atmospheric CO. Nature, 233, 187-188. &lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1038/233187a0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Crutzen, P.J. (1973) A Discussion of the Chemistry of Some Minor Constituents in the Stratosphere and Troposphere. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 106-108, 1385-1399.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00881092</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chameides, W. and Walker, J.C.G. (1973) A Photochemical Theory of Tropospheric Ozone. Journal of Geophysical Research, 78, 8751-8760.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/JC078i036p08751</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Francis, T. (2011) Effect of Asian Dust Storms on the Ambient SO2 Concentration over North-East India: A Case Study. Journal of Environmental Protection, 2, 778-795. &lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2011.26090</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kaneyasu, N., Ohta, S. and Murao, N. (1995) Seasonal Variation in the Chemical Composition of Atmospheric Aerosols and Gaseous Species in Sapporo, Japan. Atmospheric Environment, 29, 1559-1568.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(94)00356-P</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Miyakawa, T., Takegawa, N. and Kondo, Y. (2007) Removal of Sulfur Dioxide and Formation of Sulfate Aerosol in Tokyo. Journal of Geophysical Research, 112, D13209. &lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007896</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Francis, T., Sarin, M.M. and Rengarajan, R. (2016) Atmospheric SO2 Oxidation Efficiency over a Semi-Arid Region: Seasonal Patterns from Observations and GEOS-Chem Model. Atmospheric Environment, 125, 383-395.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.09.021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rajput, P., Sarin, M. and Kundu, S.S. (2013) Atmospheric Particulate Matter (PM2.5), EC, OC, {WSOC} and {PAHs} from NE-Himalaya: Abundances and Chemical Characteristics. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 4, 214-221.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.5094/APR.2013.022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Igarashi, Y., Sawa, Y., Yoshioka, K., Matsueda, H., Fujii, K. and Dokiya, Y. (2004) Monitoring the SO2 Concentration at the Summit of Mt. Fuji and a Comparison with Other Trace Gases during Winter. Journal of Geophysical Research, 109, D17304. &lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004428</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Luke, W.T. (1997) Evaluation of a Commercial Pulsed Fluorescence Detector for the Measurement of low-Level SO2 Concentrations during the Gas-Phase Sulfur Intercomparison Experiment. Journal of Geophysical Research, 102, 16255-16265.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD03347</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Luria, M., Boatman, J.F., Harris, J., Ray, J., Straube, T., Chin, J., Gunter, R.L., Herbert, G., Gerlach, T.M. and Van Valin, C.C. (1992) Atmospheric Sulfur Dioxide at Mauna Loa, Hawaii. Journal of Geophysical Research, 97, 6011-6022.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/91JD03126</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rastogi, N. and Sarin, M.M. (2005) Long-Term Characterization of Ionic Species in Aerosols from Urban and High-Altitude Sites in Western India: Role of Mineral Dust and Anthropogenic Sources. Atmospheric Environment, 39, 5541-5554.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.06.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rengarajan, R. and Sarin, M.M. (2004) Atmospheric Deposition Fluxes of 7Be, 210Pb and Chemical Species to the Arabian Sea and Bay Bengal. Indian Journal of Marine Sciences, 33, 56-64.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bey, I., Jacob, D.J., Yantosca, R.M., Logan, J.A., Field, B.D., Fiore, A.M., Li, Q., Liu, H.Y., Mickley, L.J. and Schultz, M.G. (2001) Global Modeling of Tropospheric Chemistry with Assimilated Meteorology: Model Description and Evaluation. Journal of Geophysical Research, 106, 23073-23095.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000807</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Park, R.J., Jacob, D.J., Field, B.D., Yantosca, R.M. and Chin, M. (2004) Natural and Transboundary Pollution Influences on Sulfate-Nitrate-Ammonium Aerosols in the United States: Implications for Policy. Journal of Geophysical Research, 109, D15204.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004473</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, J., Jacob, D.J. and Martin, S.T. (2008) Sensitivity of Sulfate Direct Climate forcing to the Hysteresis of Particle Phase Transitions. Journal of Geophysical Research, 113, D11207. &lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009368</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fairlie, T.D., Jacob, D.J. and Park, R.J. (2007) The Impact of Transpacific Transport of Mineral Dust in the United States. Atmospheric Environment, 41, 1251-1266.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.09.048</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, D., Wang, Y., McElroy, M.B., He, K., Yantosca, R.M. and Le Sager, P. (2009) Regional CO Pollution and Export in China Simulated by the High-Resolution Nested-Grid GEOS-Chem Model. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 9, 3825-3839.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3825-2009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Park, R.J., Jacob, D.J., Kumar, N. and Yantosca, R.M. (2006) Regional Visibility Statistics in the United States: Natural and Transboundary Pollution Influences, and Implications for the Regional Haze Rule. Atmospheric Environment, 40, 5405-5423.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.04.059</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alexander, B., Park, R.J., Jacob, D.J., Li, Q.B., Yantosca, R.M., Savarino, J., Lee, C.C.W. and Thiemens, M.H. (2005) Sulfate Formation in Sea-Salt Aerosols: Constraints from Oxygen Isotopes. Journal of Geophysical Research, 110, D10307.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005659</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, H., Jacob, D.J., Bey, I. and Yantosca, R.M. (2001) Constraints from 210Pb and 7Be on Wet Deposition and Transport in a Global Three-Dimensional Chemical Tracer Model Driven by Assimilated Meteorological Fields. Journal of Geophysical Research, 106, 12109-12128. &lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900839</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wesely, M.L. (1989) Parameterization of Surface Resistances to Gaseous Dry Deposition in Regional-Scale Numerical Models. Atmospheric Environment, 23, 1293-1304.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(89)90153-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vestreng, V. and Klein, H. (2002) Emission Data Reported to UNECE/EMEP. Quality Assurance and Trend Analysis and Presentation of WebDab, MSC-W Status Report 2002. Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kuhns, H., Green, M. and Etyemezian, V. (2003) Big Bend Regional Aerosol and Visibility Observational (BRAVO) Study Emissions Inventory. Desert Research Institute, Las Vegas, Nevada.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Olivier, J.G.J. and Berdowski, J.J.M. (2001) Global Emissions Sources and Sinks, in the Climate System. In: Berdowski, J., Guicherit, R., Heij, B.J. and Lisse, Eds., The Climate System, A.A. Balkema Publishers/Swets and Zeitlinger Publishers, The Netherlands, 33-78.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Streets, D.G., Zhang, Q., Wang, L., He, K., Hao, J., Wu, Y., Tang, Y. and Carmichael, G.R. (2006) Revisiting China's CO Emissions after the Transport and Chemical Evolution over the Pacific (TRACE-P) Mission: Synthesis of Inventories, Atmospheric Modeling, and Observations. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111, D14306. &lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007118</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, X. and Song, W. (2009) Dust Storm Detection Based on Modis Data. Conference International Conference on Geo-Spatial Solutions for Emergency Management and the 50th Anniversary of the Chinese Academy of Surveying and Mapping, Beijing, 14-16 September 2009.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Draxler, R.R. and Hess, G.D. (1998) An Overview of the HYSPLIT_4 Modeling System of Trajectories, Dispersion, and Deposition. Australian Meteorological Magazine, 47, 295-308.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Francis, T. (2012) Temporal Trends in Ambient SO2 at a High Altitude Site in Semi-Arid Western India: Observations versus Chemical Transport Modeling. Journal of Environmental Protection, 3, 657-680.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2012.37079</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Daum, P.H., Al-Sunaid, A., Busness, K.M., Hales, J.M. and Mazurek, M. (1993) Studies of the Kuwait Oil Fire Plume during Midsummer 1991. Journal of Geophysical Research, 98, 16809-16827. &lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD01204</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sharma, A.R., Kharol, S.K. and Badarinath, K.V.S. (2010) An Unusual Dust Event over North-Eastern India and Its Association with Extreme Climatic Conditions—A Study Using Satellite Data. Conference Paper: Aerosols &amp; Clouds: Climate Change Perspectives. IASTABulletin, 2000, 214-217.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Erisman, J.W., Vermeulen, A., Hensen, A., Flechard, C., D&amp;auml;mmgen, U., Fowler, D. and Tuovinen, J.-P. (2005) Monitoring and Modelling of Biosphere/Atmosphere Exchange of Gases and Aerosols in Europe. Environmental Pollution, 133, 403-413.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2004.07.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gupta, A., Kumar, R., Kumari, K.M. and Srivastava, S.S. (2004) Atmospheric Dry Deposition to Leaf Surfaces at a Rural Site of India. Chemosphere, 55, 1097-1107.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.08.035</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lee, B.-K. and Lee, C.-B. (2004) Development of an Improved Dry and Wet Deposition Collector and the Atmospheric Deposition of {PAHs} onto Ulsan Bay, Korea. Atmospheric Environment, 38, 863-871.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.10.047</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Edwards, P.J., Gregory, J.D. and Allen, H.L. (1999) Seasonal Sulfate Deposition and Export Patterns for a Small Appalachian Watershed. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 110, 137-155. &lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005087421791</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yi, S.-M., Holsen, T.M. and Noll, K.E. (1997) Comparison of Dry Deposition Predicted from Models and Measured with a Water Surface Sampler. Environmental Science &amp; Technology, 31, 272-278. &lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1021/es960410g</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bidleman, T.F. (1988) Atmospheric Processes. Environmental Science &amp; Technology, 22, 361-367. &lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1021/es00169a002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zeller, K., Donev, E., Bojinov, H. and Nikolov, N. (1997) Air Pollution Status of the Bulgarian Govedartsi Ecosystem. Environmental Pollution, 98, 281-289.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(97)00144-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Raymond, H.A., Yi, S.-M., Moumen, N., Han, Y. and Holsen, T.M. (2004) Quantifying the Dry Deposition of Reactive Nitrogen and Sulfur Containing Species in Remote Areas Using a Surrogate Surface Analysis Approach. Atmospheric Environment, 38, 2687-2697. &lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.02.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dentener, F.J., Carmichael, G.R., Zhang, Y., Lelieveld, J. and Crutzen, P.J. (1996), Role of Mineral Aerosol as a Reactive Surface in the Global Troposphere. Journal of Geophysical Research, 101, 22869-22889. &lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD01818</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li-Jones, X. and Prospero, J.M. (1998) Variations in the Size Distribution of Non-Sea-Salt Sulfate Aerosol in the Marine Boundary Layer at Barbados: Impact of African Dust. Journal of Geophysical Research, 103, 16073-16084.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD00883</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, Y. and Carmichael, G.R. (1999) The Role of Mineral Aerosol in Tropospheric Chemistry in East Asia—A Model Study. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 38, 353-366. &lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1999)038&lt;0353:TROMAI&gt;2.0.CO;2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guthrie, P.D. (1989) The CH4-CO-OH Conundrum: A Simple Analytic Approach. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 3, 287-298.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/GB003i004p00287</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kleinman, L.I. (1994) Low and High NOx Tropospheric Photochemistry. Journal of Geophysical Research, 99, 16831-16838. &lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/94JD01028</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Prather, M.J. (1994) Lifetimes and Eigenstates in Atmospheric Chemistry. Geophysical Research Letters, 21, 801-804. &lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/94GL00840</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stewart, R.W. (1995) Dynamics of the Low to High NOx Transition in a Simplified Tropospheric Photochemical Model. Journal of Geophysical Research, 100, 8929-8943.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD00691</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Krol, M.C. and Poppe, D. (1998) Nonlinear Dynamics in Atmospheric Chemistry Rate Equations. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, 29, 1-16.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005843430146</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Poppe, D. and Lustfeld, H. (1996) Nonlinearities in the Gas Phase Chemistry of the Troposphere: Oscillating Concentrations in a Simplified Mechanism. Journal of Geophysical Research, 101, 14373-14380. &lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD00339</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hess, P.G. and Madronich, S. (1997) On Tropospheric Chemical Oscillations. Journal of Geophysical Research, 102, 15949-15965. &lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00526</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hanisco, T.F., Lanzendorf, E.J., Wennberg, P.O., Perkins, K.K., Stimpfle, R.M., Voss, P.B. and Midwinter, C. (2001) Sources, Sinks, and the Distribution of OH in the Lower Stratosphere. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 105, 1543-1553.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1021/jp002334g</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lelieveld, J., Dentener, F.J., Peters, W. and Krol, M.C. (2004) On the Role of Hydroxyl Radicals in the Self-Cleansing Capacity of the Troposphere, Atmos. Chemical Physics, 4, 2337-2344.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Berglen, T.F., Berntsen, T.K., Isaksen, I.S.A. and Sundet, J.K. (2004) A Global Model of the Coupled Sulfur/Oxidant Chemistry in the Troposphere: The Sulfur Cycle. Journal of Geophysical Research, 109, D19310.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003948</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Manning, M.R., Lowe, D.C., Moss, R.C., Bodeker, G.E. and Allan, W. (2005) Short-Term Variations in the Oxidizing Power of the Atmosphere. Nature, 436, 1001-1004. &lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03900</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rohrer, F. and Berresheim, H. (2006) Strong Correlation between Levels of Tropospheric Hydroxyl Radicals and Solar Ultraviolet Radiation. Nature, 442, 184-187.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04924</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Montzka, S.A., Krol, M., Dlugokencky, E., Hall, B., J&amp;ouml;ckel, P. and Lelieveld, J. (2011) Small Interannual Variability of Global Atmospheric Hydroxyl. Science, 331, 67-69.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197640</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79248-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rex, M., Wohltmann, I., Ridder, T., Lehmann, R., Rosenlof, K., Wennberg, P., Weisenstein, D., Notholt, J., Krüger, K., Mohr, V. and Tegtmeier, S. (2014) A Tropical West Pacific OH Minimum and Implications for Stratospheric Composition. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 14, 4827-4841.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4827-2014</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>