<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJMI</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Medical Imaging</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2164-2788</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojmi.2017.73008</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJMI-79008</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Sonographic Evaluation of Pleural Effusion
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ajit</surname><given-names>Kumar Reddy</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sandeep</surname><given-names>Ballal Kaup</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Annitha</surname><given-names>Elavarasi Jayamohan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Prakash</surname><given-names>Manikka Lakshmanan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Krishnappa</surname><given-names>Nasappa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Antony</surname><given-names>Jean</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Radiodiagnosis, KIMS, Bangalore, India</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Radiodiagnosis, MGMCRI, Pondicherry, India</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Department of Radiodiagnosis, Aarthi Scans, Tirunelveli, India</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Radiodiagnosis, HOSMAT, Bangalore, India</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>drajitreddy@gmail.com(AKR)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>10</day><month>08</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>77</fpage><lpage>88</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>3,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>9,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2017</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>12,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Background: Although at times small amounts of pleural fluid is detected on the lateral decubitus chest radiograph, this may be impossible to obtain in severely ill patients. Because of its ready availability and ability for bedside imaging, ultrasonography has become a crucial imaging modality not only in detecting the presence of pleural fluid but also as a guide to aspiration. 
  Aims: To sonographically determine the nature of pleural effusions. To analyze predictability of both benign and malignant pleural effusions and to study statistical value of various ultrasound characteristics in differentiating exudative and transudative as well as benign and malignant effusions in correlation with thoracocentesis. 
  Material and Methods: Sonographic feature as well as fluid cytology was evaluated. Following categorization into exudates or transudate as well as benign or malignant the diagnosis was then correlated biochemically. 
  Results: Transudates were anechoic, while an anechoic effusion may be either a transudate or an exudate. Complex septation, internal echoes, thickened pleura or homogeneously echogenic patterns were always exudates. Sonographic findings of pleural nodules and associated parenchymal lesions in the lung and liver were indicative of malignancy. 
  Conclusions: Ultrasound in addition to being highly sensitive for pleural effusion also aided in characterizing the nature and minimizing the complications during thoracocentesis. Pleural effusions were categorized into exudates and transudate as well as benign and malignant with a certain degree of confidence based on sonographic findings.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Pleural Effusion</kwd><kwd> Sonography</kwd><kwd> Septation</kwd><kwd> Internal Echoes</kwd><kwd> Thoracocentesis</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The pleural space is an extremely thin, well defined liquid space which facilitates the sliding of lung within the chest cavity. Minimal fluid in the pleural space (5 - 20 ml) acts as an effective lubricating layer which minimizes loss of energy during the respiration and maximizes the transmission of forces from the chest wall to the lung [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>Pleura is a serous membrane of mesodermal origin. It covers the surface of the lungs as well as [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref2">2</xref>] the inner surface of the chest wall and consists of two continuous membranes―the visceral and parietal layers.</p><p>Visceral pleura covers the lung and is adherent to all its surfaces including the surfaces within the horizontal and oblique fissures. It provides the lung with a smooth slipping surface enabling it to move freely on the parietal pleura.</p><p>Parietal pleura lines the pulmonary cavities, being adherent to the thoracic wall, the mediastinum and the diaphragm. It consists of four parts―Costal, mediastinal diaphragmatic &amp; cervical parts. Both pleurae meet at the hilum of the lung.</p><p>The junctional lines consist of four sheets of pleura [two parietal and two visceral].</p><p>The initial method for evaluating pleural effusions was thoracic radiography. For orthostatic posteroanterior [PA] radiographs, a minimum of 175 ml of pleural fluid is needed for detection. Lateral radiographs allow detection of volumes starting from 75 ml.</p><p>Although at times small amounts of pleural fluid can be detected on the lateral decubitus chest radiograph, this may be impossible to obtain in severely ill patients. Due to its ready availability and ability for bedside imaging, sonography has become a crucial imaging modality not only in determining the presence of pleural fluid but also as a guide to aspiration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref4">4</xref>] . Sonography has been used to detect pleural effusions since the late 1960s.</p><p>The majority of pleural fluid collections is readily identified at US as anechoic or hypo echoic collections delineated by the echogenic line of visceral pleura and lung. While transudates and exudates have similar radiologic appearances, they can often be differentiated at US.</p><p>Normal lung is filled with air so that a distinct image of aerated lung is not possible with ultrasonography [<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>]. However, when the parenchyma loses air, it appears as a discreet tissue density. For example, an area of alveolar consolidation will appear as a hyper echoic structure with lung ultrasound. The findings of lung ultrasound abnormalities mainly depend on the ratio of air to fluid within the imaged structure.</p><p>Sonography has relatively high accuracy in the diagnosis pleural and peripheral lung disease, as compared to conventional radiography in the diagnosis of pleural effusion and its effect on the underlying lung. Differentiation of solid from cystic lesion and differentiating from tapable from non tapable pleural effusion is easier with sonography. It is ideal for site selection on skin to target</p><p>measurement, wherever guided aspiration is required. Although sonography is the ideal modality for ill patient, medical literature contains only a few reports on the application of the ultrasonic technique to the diagnosis of diseases of the pleura [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref8">8</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Method</title><p>The type of study was observational prospective in nature from Feb 2014 to Jan 2015. Adults of both sexes who were referred for ultrasound/guided aspiration were included in the study. Patients who refused to give consent and those with pre-existing bleeding disorders were excluded from the study.</p><p>A total of 51 patients with clinical diagnosis of pleural effusion resulting from a variety of diseases diagnosed on the basis of thorough history CT skiagram and being sent for ultrasound &amp; ultrasound guided pleural fluid aspiration are included in the study.</p><p>Written informed consent was obtained from the patients Sonographic examination was done. We excluded all patients not willing to give consent, with pre-existing bleeding disorders and patients below 18y.</p><p>As medical records and follow up of eight of these patients were incomplete and hence they were excluded from the study.</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Brief Explanation of the Procedure</title><p>Following detailed history, the patient was subjected to a thorough physical examination. Chest radiographs were taken in all patients and lateral view was taken, if necessary. The quantity of fluid, the side involved, presence of mediastinum lymphadenopathy, parenchymal lesions, cavitation and other radiographic abnormalities if any were noted.</p><p>Ultrasound examination included screening of Suprascapular, Scapular, Infrascapular, Superior mid axillary, Inferior mid axillary, Apical, Pectoral and Infrapectoral regions.</p><p>Thoracic sonography was performed during maximum inspiration with the patient in completely supine/sitting positions using GE Logic P5 PRO ultrasound machine with 3.5 MHz curvilinear/convex array and high frequency [7.5 - 10 MHz] linear probes as required.</p><p>With the intercostals spaces used as acoustic windows the high frequency [7.5 - 10 MHz] linear transducer applied at the latero-dorsal part of the chest wall and following findings were noted on ultrasonography, suggestive of pleural effusion.</p><p>Hypoechoic fluid separating the visceral and parietal pleura [<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>]. Moving septations in the pleural space [<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>]. Floating echogenic particles [<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>].</p><p>Moving lung suspended within the fluid. Color fluid sign on color Doppler imaging. The parietal pleura measured and defined as thickened [<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>] if the pleural thickness was 3 mm or greater. Evidence of pleural nodules which appeared as hypo echoic nodular lesions with defined margins along the parietal/visceral pleura was noted. Other associated findings such as sono air bronchogram [s/o of consolidation], pleural plaques, linear bands and loculated effusions etc noted.</p><p>Abdominal approach was used for lower extent of pleural spaces by use of convex-array [3.5 MHz] transducer directed superiorly from the abdomen with liver and spleen providing sonographic windows from the abdomen to the thorax.</p><p>Sonographic criteria of exudative type of effusions were established based pleural effusions with septations/winding bands, echogenic pleural effusions, thickening of parietal pleura by more than 3 mm and associated pleural nodules, plaques and consolidation.</p><p>Complete serum haematological/biochemical profiles were done in every</p><p>patient. Following pleural fluid aspiration using standard methods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref9">9</xref>] the nature of fluid and biochemical parameters were assessed.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Ethical Clearance</title><p>The study was approved by the Institutional Medical Ethics Committee.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Data Collection</title><p>Data was tabulated in performa sheets initially which was later entered into excel spread sheets. Biographical and other relevant details pertaining to subject were collected.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Statistical Methods</title><p>Descriptive statistical analysis was carried out in the present study. The analysed data were presented on mean and percentages. With the use of Chi-square and Fisher Exact tests the significance of the study was assessed. Other relevant diagnostic statistics such as Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV and Accuracy have been computed to evaluate the correlation between USG and Biochemical findings.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>An observational evaluation clinical study with 43 patients was undertaken to evaluate the usefulness of ultrasound to quantify, characterize the pleural effusion thus correlating with laboratory analysis. The subjects aged from 18 years to 80 years (mean age 44) of whom 21 (48.8%) were males and 22 (51.2%) were females. Of the 43 patients 22 (51.2%) were from General Medicine, 17 (39.5%) were from Pulmonary medicine whereas 4 (9.3%) were from other departments.</p><p>Right sided effusion was the most common presentation accounting for 22 (58.1%) followed by left 12 (27.9%). Bilateral effusions were seen in 6 (14%). Greater proportion of patients (25 (58.1%)) had an axial diameter (inter pleural distance) less than 5 cm, while 18 (41.9%) had an inter-pleural distance greater than 6 cm.</p><p>As seen in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, age did not show correlation with the nature of fluid however there was a gender predilection noted. Exudates were more common in men while transudates were more common in females. Right sided effusion were exudates predominantly with a moderately significant p value in both USG and Biochemical nature. Septations and internal echoes demonstrated strong significance in both.</p><p>As depicted in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>, septations and internal echoes were seen in 21 (48.8%) and 18 (41.9%) respectively. Thickened pleura was seen in 16 (37.2%) while associated parenchymal lesion and abnormal vascularity was seen in 7 (16.3%) and 2 (4.7%) patients respectively. Straw colored fluid was the more common fluid type as seen in 35 (81.4%) while hemorrhagic and other types were seen in 6 (14%) and 2 (4.7%) respectively. Sonographically 14 (32.6%) were found to have transudative type of effusion whereas 29 (67.4%) had exudative type. Likewise based on biochemical analysis 11 (25.6%) had transudative type and 32 (74.4%) were exudative. Pleural aspirates subjected to cytology reported malignancy in 7 (16.3%) and remaining 36 (83.7%) were found to be etiologically benign.</p><p>ADA was positive in 25 (58.1%) patients and culture positive in 5 (11.6%). 39 (81.4%) had a benign aetiology while 8 (18.6%) patients were found to be malignant, both sonographically and clinically.</p><p>Axial diameter, pleural thickening, parenchymal lesion, abnormal vascularity and fluid colour showed poor correlation with fluid type.</p><p>Correlation of variables with cytology/biopsy showed strong significance with respect to fluid colour and parenchymal lesions. Hemorrhagic effusion was a</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Correlation of demographics with fluid type</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Demographics</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Fluid type: USG</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Fluid type: Biochemical</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Transudate (n = 14)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Exudate (n = 29)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Transudate (n = 11)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Exudate (n = 32)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P value</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Age in years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ &lt;45 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (50%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (48.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >0.916</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (45.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (50%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.795</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ &gt;45 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (50%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 (51.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (54.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (50%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Gender</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (21.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 (62.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >0.012*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (27.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 (56.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.097<sup>+</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 (78.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 (37.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (72.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (43.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>+</sup>Suggestive significance [P value: 0.05 &lt; P &lt; 0.10]. *Moderately significant [P value: 0.01 &lt; P &lt; 0.05]. **Strongly significant [P value: P &lt; 0.01].</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Correlation of sonological parameters with nature of fluid</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Fluid type: USG</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Fluid type: Biochemical</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Transudate (n = 14)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Exudate (n = 29)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P value</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Transudate (n = 11)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Exudate (n = 32)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P value</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Side</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Left</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (28.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (27.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >0.014*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (36.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (25%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >0.014*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Right</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (35.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 (69%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (27.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 (68.8%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Bilateral</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (35.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 (3.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (36.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (6.3%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Axial diameter</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ 1 - 5 cm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (64.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (55.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >0.570</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (63.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 (56.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >0.736</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ 6 - 10 cm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (35.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (44.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (36.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (43.8%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Septation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Absent</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (100%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (27.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >&lt;0.001**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 (100%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 (34.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >&lt;0.001**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Present</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 (72.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 (65.6%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Internal echoes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Absent</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (100%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 (37.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >&lt;0.001**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 (100%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (43.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >0.001**</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Present</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 (62.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 (56.3%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >PL thickening</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Absent</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 (78.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (55.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >0.137</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (81.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 (56.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >0.166</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Present</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (21.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 (44.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (18.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (43.8%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Parenchymal lesion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Absent</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 (78.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25 (86.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >0.665</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (72.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 (87.5%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >0.347</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Present</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (21.4%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (13.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (27.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (12.5%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Abnormal vascularity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Absent</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (100%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27 (93.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 (100%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 (93.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >1.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Present</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (6.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (6.3%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Fluid color</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Straw colored</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (85.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23 (79.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >1.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (81.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26 (81.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >0.809</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Hemorrhagic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (14.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (13.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (18.2%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (12.5%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >・ Others</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (50%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14 (48.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 (0%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (6.3%)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>+</sup>Suggestive significance [P value: 0.05 &lt; P &lt; 0.10]. *Moderately significant [P value: 0.01 &lt; P &lt; 0.05]. **Strongly significant. [P value: P &lt; 0.01].</p><p>feature of malignancy whereas straw coloured fluid was seen in both benign as well as malignant conditions. Whilst abnormal vascularity showed moderate significance with cytology biopsy, pleural thickening only suggested significance. Residual variables showed no correlation with cytology.</p><p>Correlation of clinical variables with ADA demonstrated strong significance with septations and associated parenchymal lesions (p &lt; 0.001). Presence of septations and absence of parenchymal lesions favored ADA positivity. Whilst side and fluid colour suggested significance, the residual variables did not show significance. Straw coloured fluid and right sided effusions were more commonly ADA positive.</p><p>USG fluid type correlation with biochemical fluid type depicted strong significance with sensitivity of 90.63%, specificity of 100%, and positive predictive value of 100% and negative predictive value of 78.57%. Likewise, Correlation of Clinical diagnosis with USG diagnosis demonstrated a strong p value with sensitivity of 87.50%, specificity of 97.14%, positive predictive value of 87.50% and negative predictive value of 97.14%.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Our study showed the mean age of incidence to be 44 yrs similar to study conducted by Zay Soe et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref10">10</xref>] . Majority of our patients were elderly belonging to age group above 60 which was contrary to findings by Anand Patel et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref11">11</xref>] . This could possibly be due to higher incidence of diabetes, low immune status, environmental factors.</p><p>Most studies demonstrate a slight male preponderance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref15">15</xref>] . However similar to findings by Jeffery R et al. our study showed no gender predilection. Interestingly our study demonstrated higher occurrence of transudative type of effusion in women and exudative type in men. This is somewhat similar to findings by Connolly M et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref5">5</xref>] and Anand P et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref11">11</xref>] where the incidence of exudative TB is nearly two fold higher in women.</p><p>Unilateral effusions were more frequently right sided, tuberculosis being the most common cause in developing countries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref10">10</xref>] . Malignancy remains the most common cause of unilateral pleural effusion in the west [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref19">19</xref>] . This feature was well demonstrated in our study as well. Some authors however believe that there is no tendency to occur preferentially on either the right or the left side [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref11">11</xref>] . Logical explanation to this would be the anatomical nature of the right lung which acts as a natural reservoir of choice with a larger surface area.</p><p>Contrary to Kalomenidis et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref12">12</xref>] heart failure was the most common cause of bilateral effusions (5 of 6 patients). Valdes et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref13">13</xref>] findings were consistent with our findings. Higher rate of admission of cardiac patients could explain the above finding.</p><p>Several studies have found that pleural effusions with complex septated, complex non-septated, or homogeneously Echogenic patterns are always exudates, whereas hypo echoic effusions can be either transudates or exudates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref15">15</xref>] . Our findings were found to be consistent with the above studies. Previous school of thought was that the use of sonography to determine the nature of pleural effusions was limited [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref20">20</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref30">30</xref>] .</p><p>An association was demonstrated by a group of authors between Pleural thickening, complex septated pattern, fibrinous strands and tuberculosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref30">30</xref>] . This association was similarly seen in our study as well.</p><p>While some studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref32">32</xref>] found that ultrasound lacked specificity in differentiating solid from cystic areas in the pleural cavity and was poor at predicting the nature of the fluid or whether or not it is infected. Another study found that presence of a pulmonary consolidation or lung abscess may suggest an exudate of infectious origin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref30">30</xref>] . Our study in addition to the latter finding suggested that the associated parenchymal lesions with abnormal vascularity favored malignancy.</p><p>Hemorrhagic effusion was a feature of malignancy as seen in studies by Gopi A [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref31">31</xref>] , Siebert AF [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref32">32</xref>] , et al while straw coloured fluid was characteristic of tuberculosis. One patient however presented with a large hemorrhagic effusion which later was found to be of tubercular etiology similar to case report by Charalampos M et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><p>Similar to many studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79008-ref11">11</xref>] elevated ADA levels was associated with tuberculosis. So were the Sonographic features of tuberculosis [Septations and consolidations].</p><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Limitations</title><p>Study included a small group. Hence definitive criteria cannot be established based on the size. Number of patients who underwent biopsy is not significant statistically. Higher number of subjects may be required for confirmatory findings as well as arrival at definitive criteria.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Conclusions</title><p>Septations and internal echoes within a hypoechoic space were useful indicators in differentiating effusion from an underlying mass lesion.</p><p>In this study, we noticed that internal echoes and septations were a feature of all kinds of exudates, inclusive of empyema, hemothorax, synpneumonic effusions, and malignant pleural effusions.</p><p>Sometimes when the effusion was rich in protein the septa were so extensive that they had a honeycomb appearance.</p><p>Apart from the diagnostic utility in cases of pleural effusion, chest sonography also can be used to guide a percutaneous transthoracic needle for aspiration.</p><p>We may conclude that sonography is a crucial diagnostic tool for detecting presence and assessing nature of pleural effusions.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>I acknowledge with a deep sense of gratitude to my guide Dr. M. L. Prakash, Head of Department of Radio diagnosis, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Pondicherry for his constant guidance and encouragement. His dedication towards work was and will always be a constant source of inspiration for me. My sincere thanks to my co-guide Dr. K. Surendra Menon, Head of Department of Pulmonary Medicine, MGMC&amp;RI, without whom, my study would not have been possible. I acknowledge the assistance provided by faculty members and colleagues of Department of Pulmonary Medicine, MGMC&amp;RI. I wish to extend my special thanks to my wife Dr. Anitha J Ajit for her extensive help.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Reddy, A.K., Kaup, S.B., Jayamohan, A.E., Lakshmanan, P.M., Nasappa, K. and Jean, A. (2017) Sonographic Evaluation of Pleural Effusion. Open Journal of Medical Imaging, 7, 77-88. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojmi.2017.73008</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.79008-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kocijancic</surname><given-names> I. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2006</year>)<article-title>Imaging of Small Amounts of Pleural Fluid. Part Two—Physiologic Pleural Fluid</article-title><source> Radiology and Oncology</source><volume> 40</volume>,<fpage> 1</fpage>-<lpage>5</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79008-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chang, D., Yang, P., Luh, K., Kuo, S. and Yu, C. (1991) Ultrasound-Guided Pleural Biopsy with Tru-Cut Needle. CHEST Journal, 100, 1328-1333.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79008-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sikora, K., Perera, P., Mailhot, T. and Mandavia, D. (2012) Ultrasound for the Detection of Pleural Effusions and Guidance of the Thoracentesis Procedure. ISRN Emergency Medicine, 2012, 1-10.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79008-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Joyner, C., Herman, R. and Reid, J. (1967) Reflected Ultrasound in the Detection and Localization of Pleural Effusion. JAMA, 200, 399-402.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79008-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Pell</surname><given-names> R. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1964</year>)<article-title>Ultrasound for Routine Clinical Investigations</article-title><source> Ultrasonics</source><volume> 2</volume>,<fpage> 87</fpage>-<lpage>89</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79008-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sandweiss, D., Hanson, J., Gosink, B. and Moser, K. (1975) Ultrasound in Diagnosis, Localization, and Treatment of Loculated Pleural Empyema. Annals of Internal Medicine, 82, 50-53.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79008-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Viikeri, M., Jaaskelainen, J. and Tahti, E. (1968) Ultrasonic examination of pleural thickenings and calcifications in occupational asbestosis. CHEST Journal, 54, 17-20.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79008-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Soe, Z., Shwe, W. and Moe, S. (2010) A Study on Tuberculous Pleural Effusion. International Journal of Collaborative Research on Internal Medicine &amp; Public Health, 2, 32-48.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79008-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Havelock, T., Teoh, R., Laws, D. and Gleeson, F. (2010) Pleural Procedures and Thoracic Ultrasound: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline. Thorax, 65, i61-i76. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2010.137026</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79008-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Patel, A. and Choudhury, S. (2011) Tuberculous Pleural Effusion: Clinico-Radiological and Biochemical Features Observed in an Indian Region. Indian Journal of Medical Specialities, 2, 144-146. https://doi.org/10.7713/ijms.2011.0035</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79008-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Beaiilieii, Y. and Marik, P. (2005) Bedside Ultrasonography in the ICU. Part 2. Chest, 128, 1766-1781.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79008-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kalomenidis, I., Moschos, C., Kollintza, A., Sigala, I., Stathopoulos, G.T., Papiris, S., Light, R.W. and Roussos, C. (2008) Pneumothorax-Associated Pleural Eosinophilia Is Tumour Necrosis Factor-Alpha-Dependent and Attenuated by Steroids. Respirology, 1, 73-78.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79008-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Akhan, O., Demirkazik, F., Ozmen, M., Balkanci, F., Ozkara, S., et al. (1992) Tuberculous Pleural Effusions: Ultrasonic Diagnosis. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, 20, 461-465. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.1870200708</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79008-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, K., Liaw, Y., Wang, H., Luh, K. and Yang, P. (2000) Sonographic Septation: A Useful Prognostic Indicator of Acute Thoracic Empyema. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 19, 837-843. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2000.19.12.837</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79008-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chung, C., Chen, C., Yeh, C., Sheu, J. and Chang, S. (2008) Early Effective Drainage in the Treatment of Loculated Tuberculous Pleurisy. European Respiratory Journal, 31, 1261-1267. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00122207</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79008-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lai, Y., Su, M., Weng, H., Wu, J. and Chiu, C. (2009) Sonographic Septation: A Predictor of Sequelae of Tuberculous Pleurisy after Treatment. Thorax, 64, 806-809.  
https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2008.110197</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79008-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pose, A., Gonzalez-Juanatey, J., Sarandeses, A., Salgueiro, M., et al. (1991) Cholesterol: A Useful Parameter for Distinguishing between Pleural Exudates and Transudates. CHEST Journal, 99, 1097-1102. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.99.5.1097</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79008-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Doust, B., Baum, J., Maklad, N. and Doust, V. (1975) Ultrasonic Evaluation of Pleural Opacities 1. Radiology, 114, 135-140. https://doi.org/10.1148/114.1.135</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79008-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Laing, F. and Filly, R. (1978) Problems in the Application of Ultrasonography for the Evaluation of Pleural Opacities 1. Radiology, 126, 211-214.  
https://doi.org/10.1148/126.1.211</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79008-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rosenberg, E. (1983) Ultrasound in the Assessment of Pleural Densities. CHEST Journal, 84, 283-285. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.84.3.283</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79008-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hirsch, J., Rogers, J. and Mack, L. (1981) Real-Time Sonography of Pleural Opacities. American Journal of Roentgenology, 136, 297-301.  
https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.136.2.297</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79008-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Marks, W., Filly, R. and Callen, P. (1982) Real-Time Evaluation of Pleural Lesions: New Observations Regarding the Probability of Obtaining Free Fluid. Radiology, 142, 163-164. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.142.1.7053526</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79008-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lipscomb, D. and Flower, C. (1980) Ultrasound in the Diagnosis and Management of Pleural Disease. British Journal of Diseases of the Chest, 74, 353-361.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79008-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rahman, N., Chapman, S. and Davies, R. (2004) Pleural Effusion: A Structured Approach to Care. British Medical Bulletin, 72, 31-47.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldh040</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79008-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, H., Hsu, W., Tu, C., Yu, Y., Chiu, K., Hang, L., et al. (2006) Sonographic Septation in Lymphocyte-Rich Exudative Pleural Effusions A Useful Diagnostic Predictor for Tuberculosis. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 25, 857-863.  
https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2006.25.7.857</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79008-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martinez, O., Serrano, B., Romero, R., et al. (1989) Real-Time Ultrasound Evaluation of Tuberculous Pleural Effusions. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, 17, 407-410.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.1870170605</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79008-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hirsch, J., Carter, S., Chikos, P. and Colacurcio, C. (1978) Ultrasonic Evaluation of Radiographic Opacities of the Chest. American Journal of Roentgenology, 130, 1153-1156. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.130.6.1153</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79008-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kearney, S., Davies, C., Davies, R. and Gleeson, F. (2000) Computed Tomography and Ultrasound in Parapneumonic Effusions and Empyema. Clinical Radiology, 55, 542-547. https://doi.org/10.1053/crad.1999.0480</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79008-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wernecke, K. (2000) Ultrasound Study of the Pleura. European Radiology, 10, 1515-1523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300000526</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79008-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mermigkis, C., Kopanakis, A., Psathakis, K., Karagiannidis, N., Kastanakis, M., Patentalakis, M., et al. (2009) A Massive Hemorrhagic Pleural Effusion Does not Exclude the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis: A Case Report. Cases Journal, 2, 8707.  
https://doi.org/10.4076/1757-1626-2-8707</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79008-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gopi, A., Madhavan, S., Sharma, S. and Sahn, S. (2007) Diagnosis and Treatment of Tuberculous Pleural Effusion in 2006. CHEST Journal, 131, 880-889.  
https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.06-2063</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79008-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Seibert, A., Haynes, J., Middleton, R. and Bass, J. (1991) Tuberculous Pleural Effusion. Twenty-Year Experience. CHEST Journal, 99, 883-886.  
https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.99.4.883</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>