<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JCDSA</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Cosmetics, Dermatological Sciences and Applications</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-4105</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jcdsa.2017.73019</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JCDSA-78987</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Epidemiological and Clinical Aspects of Neonatal Dermatoses at the National Teaching Hospital HKM of Cotonou Benin
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hugues</surname><given-names>Adegbidi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Félix</surname><given-names>Atadokpede</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Christiane</surname><given-names>Koudoukpo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Marcelline</surname><given-names>d’Almeida</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bérénice</surname><given-names>Dégboé</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Florence</surname><given-names>Alihonou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fabrice</surname><given-names>Akpadjan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lydie</surname><given-names>Savoeda</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Florencia</surname><given-names>do Ango-Padonou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Dermatology-Venereology, Faculty of Medecine of Parakou, University of Parakou, Parakou, Benin</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Pediatry, Faculty of Health Sciences of Cotonou, University of Abomey-Calavi, Abomey-Calavi, Benin</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Dermatology-Venereology, Faculty of Health Sciences of Cotonou, University of Abomey-Calavi, Abomey-Calavi, Benin</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>adegbidih@yahoo.fr(HA)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>07</day><month>08</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>204</fpage><lpage>210</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>8,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>8,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2017</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>11,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Neonatal dermatoses (NND) are frequent, varied and of variable prognosis. The objective of this work was to study the epidemiological and clinical aspects of NND at the NTH-HKM. 
  <b>Methods</b>
  : This was a cross-sectional descriptive and analytical study from December 1, 2014 to February 28, 2015. All newborns received in the Department of Pediatrics and Medical Genetics and with dermatosis were included. The diagnosis of dermatoses was clinical. 
  <b>Results</b>
  : During the study period, 355 newborns had at least one NND on a total of 580 newborns received, a prevalence of 61.2%. The sex ratio was 1.54 and the average age was 3.11 days. Transient dermatoses were more frequent (80%), dominated by desquamation + xerosis (33.75%). Congenital melanocytic nevi (40.74%) and malformations and vascular tumors (18.52%) were the 
  most noted pathological neonatal dermatoses. Only age was statistically associated with NND. <b>Conclusion</b>: DNH is common in newborns at th
  e NTH-HKM. They were mostly transitory. Pathological conditions should be treated where appropriate
  .
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Epidemiological and Clinical Aspects</kwd><kwd> Dermatoses</kwd><kwd> Newborns</kwd><kwd> Benin</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Neonatal dermatoses (NND) are mucocutaneous and/or phanerian disorders observed between the 1st and the 28th day of life. They are frequent, diverse and of variable prognosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78987-ref1">1</xref>] . They may be transient or constitute true pathologies requiring treatment. It is therefore important to recognize these dermatoses in order to carry out a good evaluation of each case in order to make an appropriate care. Few works have been done on the subject in Africa. The objective of this study is to study the epidemiological and clinical aspects of NND at the NTH-HKM in Cotonou.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methods</title><p>This was a cross-sectional descriptive and analytical study that took place from December 1st, 2014 to February 28<sup>th</sup>, 2015. All newborns seen in consultation or hospitalized in the Department of Pediatrics and Medical Genetics dermatosis were included. The diagnosis of dermatoses was clinical. After the newborn was examined by a dermatologist, the parents were interviewed and the data supplemented using the newborn's medical record. Any child born before 37 weeks of amenorrhea was considered premature. It is post-term when gestational age was greater than 42 weeks of amenorrhea. Any birth weight greater than or equal to 2500 grams was normal. The data collected were recorded and processed with the EPI INFO software version 3.7. The Chi<sup>2</sup> test was used to compare the proportions. The threshold of significance was p &lt; 0.05.</p><p>Transient neonatal dermatoses: skin manifestations characterized mainly by their spontaneous reversibility, from a few minutes to a few days or weeks.</p><p>Pathologic neonatal dermatoses: cutaneous manifestations which do not heal spontaneously during the first month of life and which mostly require treatment.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. General Characteristics of Newborns</title><p>We examined 580 newborns, of whom 355 had at least one dermatosis. The prevalence of NND at the NTH-HKM was 61.2%. Boys accounted for 60.56% and girls 39.44% of newborns included, with an average age of 3.11 days. Regarding gestational age, the term of pregnancy was imprecise for five (05) newborns. The general characteristics of newborns are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Clinical Features</title><p>Transient dermatoses were found in 323 (80%) newborns such as desquamation, xerosis, sudoral military, mongoloid spot, sebaceous hyperplasia toxic erythema ecchymosis and haematoma and melanic pustulosis. Pathological dermatoses were found in 81 (20%) newborns such as congenital melanocytary nevus, vasculary lesions, infectious dermatosis, irrritative dermatosis, cutaneous malformations, ichtyosis and congenital non infectious bullous dermatosis.</p><p>Congenital melanocytic nevus was the most frequent pathological NND (40.74%).</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> respectively show the distribution of cases of transient NND and pathological NND.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> General characteristics of newborns</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Dernatoses</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Transient</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pathological</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sex</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.66%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.44%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age of newborns</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Less than 1 week</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >More than 1 week</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.98%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.02%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Term</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Prematurity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Post maturity</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.14%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Newborn’s weight</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >≤2500 gr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;2500 gr</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.79%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.21%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Delivery’s way</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Caesarean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.80%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.20%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gestity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Multigravida</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nulligeste</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.45%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.55%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Multipare</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primipare</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.82%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.18%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Sharing out of cases of transitional NND</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Transitional dermatosis</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effectif</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Desquamation + xerosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >109</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sudoral miliary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mongolo&#239;d spot</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.36</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sebaceous hyperplasia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.38</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Toxic erythema</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.64</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ecchymosis + Haematoma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.72</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Melanic pustulosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.86</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >323</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Sharing out of cases of pathological NND</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pathological dermatosis</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effectif</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Congenital melanocytary naevus Vasculary lesions</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33 15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.74 18.52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Infectious dermatosis Irritatives dermatosis Cutaneous malformations Ichtyosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13 10 5 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.05 12.35 6.17 3.70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Congenital non infectious bullous dermatosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.47</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TOTAL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows a case of congenital cystic lymphangioma vascular malformation.</p><p>The lesions were much more present in the glabrous skin (face, neck, trunk, limbs) with a predominance in the trunk (39.08%) and then in the cephalic region (34.45%).</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Correlation between NND and Neonatals Factors</title><p>The correlation between NND and certain neonatal factors is given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>. It’s appear that the age of the newborns have a correlation with the dermatosis witch are seen. We didn’t find another significant correlation between neonatal factor and NND.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Several studies have been carried out on the prevalence of NND in different countries and races. The literature reports a prevalence between 40% and 100% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78987-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78987-ref3">3</xref>] . The prevalence of 61.2% in our study is close to that reported by LORENZ S. (59.7%) in Germany [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78987-ref4">4</xref>] . On the other hand, it is less than that obtained by EKIZ &#214;. In Turkey (67.3%), KANE A. in Senegal (94.2%), TRAORE A. in Burkina Faso (95%) and OYEDEJE OA in Nigeria 96%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78987-ref8">8</xref>] . These different results can be related to study methods (multiplicity of study sites, longer study duration, age of newborns included) and racial characteristics.</p><p>The majority (80%) of NNDs were transient as reported by many other authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78987-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78987-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78987-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78987-ref9">9</xref>] . This is due to the fact that these dermatoses are phenomena of physiological adaptation to the air environment and linked to intrauterine life. Of these, the most frequent were desquamation + xerosis (33.75%), sweating miliary (22.29%), mongoloid spots (21.36%) and sebaceous hyperplasia (12.38%). These neonatal dermatoses were also the most noted in Senegalese newborns except for the sudoral miliary [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78987-ref6">6</xref>] . The Sahelian-Senegalese climate of Senegal could explain this low rate of sweat miliary observed. KANE A. and FERHABAS A. noted in Senegal and Turkey that desquamation + xerosis was the most frequent dermatosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78987-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78987-ref10">10</xref>] as we observed (33.75%) at rates of 41%, 43% and 39.5% respectively. These results are in the range of 72% to 83% reported in the literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78987-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78987-ref12">12</xref>] . In our study, miliary sweat was the second (22.29%) NND</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Correlation between NND and neonatals factors</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Maternals and neonatals factors</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Effectif</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >p</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Newborns’ age</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;7 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >323</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;7 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Sex</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >215</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.635</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Femal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >140</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Pathway of delivery</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cesarean section</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >262</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.711</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lower way</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Gestationnal age</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Premature</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.157</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Term</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >297</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Post-term</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Born weight</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;2500 g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.652</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;2500 g</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >301</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mother’s parity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primipara</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >132</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.157</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Multipare</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >223</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>most encountered as in Nigerian newborns (24.6%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78987-ref8">8</xref>] . SACHDEVA M. had a rate of 23.8% of sweat miliary in Indian infants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78987-ref12">12</xref>] , similar to that of our study. On the other hand, TRAORE A. in Burkina Faso had as first neonatal dermatosis the sweat miliary with a rate of 31.1% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78987-ref7">7</xref>] . This higher rate may be related to climatic conditions and the study period. The rates of mongoloid spot (21.36%) and sebaceous hyperplasia (12.38%) noted in our study are close to those obtained by KANE A. in Senegalese newborns (23.72% for Mongoloid spots and 16.51% for sebaceous hyperplasia) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78987-ref6">6</xref>] . As for the pathological DNN, the congenital melanocytic nevus came first (40.74%) as in the KANE A. study (39.6%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78987-ref6">6</xref>] . The second pathological DNN we noted was the malformations and vascular tumors with a proportion of 18.52%. This rate is close to those of CHAITHIRAYANON S. (16.9%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78987-ref13">13</xref>] and FERAHBAS A. (19.2%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78987-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>The majority of the NNDs concerned the glabrous skin in our study as also noted KANE A. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78987-ref6">6</xref>] . The trunk was the most affected anatomical zone followed by the cephalic part (scalp + face + neck). This is consistent with the results of TRAORE A. in Burkina Faso [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78987-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>Different studies have been conducted on the correlation between NNDs and some maternal and neonatal factors. In our series, out of the age of newborn babies, no statistically significant relationship could be established with the other factors studied (sex, gestational age, childbirth, birth weight, parity of mothers). TRAORE A, SACHDEVA M and JAIN N [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78987-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78987-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78987-ref14">14</xref>] also did not find a correlation between the NND factors mentioned above. However, HAVERI FTTS. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78987-ref15">15</xref>] as well as SHEHAB M. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78987-ref16">16</xref>] noted that birth weight was statistically associated with NND. This may be due to the difference in the method of study (inclusion and exclusion criteria).</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>This study allowed us to take stock of the NND at the NTH-HKM given that no data existed on the subject in Benin. It shows us that NNDs are common among newborns at the NTH-HKM. Transient dermatoses were predominant and should be distinguished from pathological dermatoses for possible treatment. Further in-depth investigations, whether or not to specifically link each DNN to particular factors, should be conducted.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>No conflicts of interest to declare.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Adegbidi, H., Atadokpede, F., Koudoukpo, C., d’Almeida, M., D&#233;gbo&#233;, B., Alihonou, F., Akpadjan, F., Savoeda, L. and do Ango-Padonou, F. (2017) Epidemiological and Clinical Aspects of Neonatal Dermatoses at the National Teaching Hospital HKM of Cotonou Benin. Journal of Cosmetics, Dermatological Sciences and Applications, 7, 204-210. https://doi.org/10.4236/jcdsa.2017.73019</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.78987-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Barbarot, S. and Stalder, J.F. (2003) Dermatologie néonatale. Encycl Méd Chir (Elsevier, Paris), Dermatologie, 98-860-A-10, 18 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78987-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">El-Moneim, A.A. and El-Dawela, R.E. (2012) Survey of Skin Disorders in Newborns: Clinical Observation in an Egyptian Medical Centre Nursery. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 18, 49-55.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78987-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baruah, C.M., Bhat, V., Bhargava, R., Garg, R.B. and Ku (1991) Prevalence of Dermatoses in the Neonates in Pondichery. Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, 57, 25-28.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78987-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lorenz, S., Maier, C., Segerer, H., Landthaler, M. and Hohenleutner, U. (2000) Skin Changes in Newborn Infants in the First 5 Days of Life. Hautarzt, 51, 396-400.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s001050051140</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78987-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ekiz, O., Gül, ü., Mollamahmutoglu, L. and Gonül, M. (2013) Skin Findings in Newborns and Their Relationship with Maternal Factors: Observational Research. Annals of Dermatology, 25, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.5021/ad.2013.25.1.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78987-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kane, A., Anjembe, E.C., Diallo, M., Sy, T.N.D. and Ndiaye, B. (2003) Dermatoses néonatales à Dakar. Etude prospective portant sur 3355 enfants. Annales De Dermatologie Et De Venereologie, 130, 53.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78987-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Traore, A., Barro-Traore, F., Guiguemde, A., Niamba, P., Diatto, N.G., Andonaba, J.B., et al. (2007) Aspects épidémiologiques et cliniques des dermatoses néonatales en milieu noir africain. Annales De Dermatologie Et De Venereologie, 134, 67.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0151-9638(07)89107-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78987-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oyedeji, O.A., Joel-Medewase, V.I., Ogunlesi, T.A. and Oyedeji, G.A. (2008) Dermatoses in the Nigerian Newborn. Research Journal of Medical Sciences, 2, 19-22.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78987-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Agarwal, G., Kumar, V., Ahmad, S., Goel, K., Goel, P., Prakash, A., et al. (2012) A Study on Neonatal Dermatosis in a Tertiary Hospital of Western Uttar Pradesh India. Journal of Community Medicine &amp; Health Education, 2, 169.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78987-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ferahbas, A., Utas, S., Akcakus, M., Gunes, T. and Mistik, S. (2009) Prevalence of Cutaneous Findings in Hospitalized Neonates: A Prospective Observational Study. Pediatric Dermatology, 26, 139-142.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1470.2009.00903.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78987-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gokdemir, G., Erdogan, H.K., Koslu, A. and Baksu, B. (2009) Cutaneous Lesions in Turkish Neonates Born in a Teaching Hospital. Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, 75, 638. https://doi.org/10.4103/0378-6323.57742</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78987-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sachdeva, M., Kaur, S., Nagpal, M. and Dewan, S.P. (2002) Cutaneous Lesions in Newborn. Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, 68, 334-337.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78987-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chaithirayanon, S. and Chunharas, A. (2013) A Survey of Birthmarks and Cutaneous Lesions in Newborns. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, 96, 49-53.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78987-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jain, N., Rathore, B.S. and Krishna, A. (2014) Dermatoses in Indian Neonates: A Clinical Study. Egyptian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology, 34, 86-92.  
https://doi.org/10.4103/1110-6530.150255</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78987-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Haveri, F.T.T.S. and Inamadar, A.C. (2014) A Cross Sectional Prospective Study of Cutaneous Lesions in Newborn. ISRN Dermatology, 2014, Article ID: 360590.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78987-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shehab, M.M., Youssef, D.M. and Khalil, M.M. (2015) Prevalence of Cutaneous Skin Lesions in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Single Center Study. Journal of Clinical Neonatology, 4, 169-172. https://doi.org/10.4103/2249-4847.159872</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>