<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2017.810159</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-78933</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Using Pyroxasulfone for Downy Brome (&lt;i&gt;Bromus tectorum&lt;/i&gt; L.) Control in Winter Wheat
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Vipan</surname><given-names>Kumar</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Prashant</surname><given-names>Jha</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Amit</surname><given-names>J. Jhala</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Research Centers, Southern Agricultural Research Center, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>vipan.kumar@montana.edu(VK)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>04</day><month>09</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>10</issue><fpage>2367</fpage><lpage>2378</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>July</day>	<month>25,</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>3,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>September</day>	<month>6,</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Downy brome
   
  is one of the most troublesome weeds in no-till wheat production systems of
   
  the US Great Plains.
   
  Pyroxasulfone is a relatively new, soil-applied residual herbicide (root/shoot growth inhibitor) labeled
   
  for use in wheat. Multiple field experiments were
   
  conducted
   
  near Huntley, MT from 2012 through 2016 to determine the efficacy
   
  of pyroxasulfone
   
  to control
   
  downy brome in imidazolinone (IMI)-tolerant
   
  (Clearfield&amp;#8482) winter wheat. Pyroxasulfone
   
  did not cause any injury to wheat in any of the three studies.
   
  Downy brome injury with pyroxasulfone
   
  preemergence (PRE) only program did not differ between 89 or 178 g
  &amp;middot;
  ai (active ingredient)
  &amp;middot;
  ha
  <sup>-</sup>
  <sup>1</sup>
   rates, and averaged 82% and 84% in 2 separate studies. In a preplant (PP) burndown program, the addition of pyroxasulfone (178 g
  &amp;middot;
  ai
  &amp;middot;
  ha
  <sup>-</sup>
  <sup>1</sup>
  ) to glyphosate improved downy brome end-season injury from 15
  %
   to 74%. In a separate study, the end-season injury
   
  with pyroxasulfone was greater when applied PRE (84%) compared to the delayed PRE (DPRE) timing (74%). In addition, the water dispersible granule (WDG) formulation of pyroxasulfone performed slightly better than the suspension concentrate (SC) formulation for downy brome injury. Pyroxasulfone
   
  applied PRE in the fall at a rate of 89 g
  &amp;middot;
  ai
  &amp;middot;
  ha
  <sup>-</sup>
  <sup>1</sup>
   followed by (fb)
   
  imazamox (44 g
  &amp;middot;
  ai
  &amp;middot;
  ha
  <sup>-</sup>
  <sup>1</sup>
   rate) applied postemergence (POST)
   
  in the spring effectively controlled downy brome (99% end-season injury). Furthermore, the injury was consistent with the standard program
   
  comprising of propoxycarbazone (29 g
  &amp;middot;
  ai
  &amp;middot;
  ha
  <sup>-</sup>
  <sup>1</sup>
  ) PRE fb
   
  imazamox POST in IMI-tolerant winter wheat. In conclusion, pyroxasulfone
   
  applied PRE in the fall can be effectively utilized in conjunction with a standard acetolactate synthase (ALS)-inhibitor-based POST herbicide program for a season-long downy brome management
   
  in winter wheat.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Downy Brome</kwd><kwd> Pyroxasulfone</kwd><kwd> Soil-Applied Herbicide</kwd><kwd> Herbicide Rate</kwd><kwd> Application Timing</kwd><kwd> Formulation</kwd><kwd> Wheat</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body>



<sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is an important cereal grain crop well suited for dryland cropping systems of the northwestern United States, including Montana. In 2015, Montana ranked third among the wheat producing states, accounting for 9% of the total US wheat production [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref1">1</xref>] . About 75% of the total wheat grown in the United States is winter wheat [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref2">2</xref>] , which is primarily grown in rotation with chemical fallow, pulse crops (dry pea, chickpea, or lentil), or canola in this region. Weed management is a major obstacle in successful winter wheat production [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref3">3</xref>] , and a season-long weed infestation can cause severe reductions in yield and grain quality of winter wheat [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>Downy brome (commonly known as cheatgrass) is an invasive, self-pollinated, winter annual grass weed, widespread in rangeland and winter wheat production areas of this region [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref6">6</xref>] . It is a native of Mediterranean region of Europe, and was first identified in the United States in 1861 in New York and Pennsylvania [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref7">7</xref>] . Currently, downy brome infests 23 million hectares in 17 states in the northwestern United States [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref8">8</xref>] . The increased downy brome abundance in the semi-arid wheat production systems is attributed to the adoption of no-till practice, mainly for soil moisture conservation and soil erosion prevention, and limited selective herbicides for downy brome management [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref6">6</xref>] . Downy brome seeds are short-lived (1 to 2 years), best germinating at 20˚C, and seedlings emerge from shallow soil depths (1 to 5 cm) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref10">10</xref>] . Fall-emerging downy brome seedlings overwinter in a semi-dormant state and resume growth in the spring after winter vernalization. Those plants attain physiological maturity by mid-June in this region [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref11">11</xref>] . Downy brome is a prolific seed producer (up to 2.6 billion seeds ha<sup>−1</sup>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><p>Downy brome interference in winter wheat has been studied extensively, and moderate to severe grain yield reductions have been reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref15">15</xref>] . Downy brome at densities of 24, 40, and 65 plants∙m<sup>−2</sup> reduced winter wheat yields by 10%, 15%, and 20%, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref15">15</xref>] . In a study conducted in Washington, a moderate infestation of downy brome at a density of 54 plants∙m<sup>−2</sup> reduced winter wheat yield by 28% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref14">14</xref>] . High levels of downy brome infestation (&gt;500 plants∙m<sup>−2</sup>) can cause near-total (&gt;92%) yield loss in winter wheat [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>The timing of downy brome emergence has a greater influence on wheat yield reductions than the plant density [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref15">15</xref>] . The early-emerging cohorts of downy brome (that emerged between planting and 1 to 2 weeks after winter wheat emergence) were found to be more competitive than the late-emerging cohorts (that emerged after 3 weeks of winter wheat emergence) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref15">15</xref>] . For instance, downy brome at densities of 200 to 400 plants∙m<sup>−2</sup> that emerged in the fall with winter wheat, reduced winter wheat yields up to 68% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref13">13</xref>] . Up to 40% winter wheat yield reductions were observed when fall-emerging downy brome at 132 plants∙m<sup>−2</sup> were not controlled by early spring; however, the yield loss was only 6% when those plants were removed by March [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>Growers rely on selective herbicides for downy brome management in wheat. A majority of these herbicides belong to five different ALS-inhibiting herbicide families, including sulfonylureas (SU), imidazolinones (IMI), triazolopyrimidines (TP), pyrimidinylthiobenzoates (PTB), and sulfonylamino-carbonyl-triazolinones (SCT). However, the intensive use of these ALS-inhibiting herbicides has resulted in the evolution of ALS-resistant downy brome biotypes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref16">16</xref>] . For instance, a downy brome biotype with cross-resistance to imazamox (IMI), propoxycarbazone-sodium (SCT), and pyroxsulam (TP) has recently been reported from an IMI-tolerant winter wheat field in Montana [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref17">17</xref>] . Similarly, downy brome biotypes with cross-resistance to primisulfuron, sulfosulfuron, imazamox, and propoxycarbazone have been documented from Kentucky bluegrass fields in Oregon [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref19">19</xref>] , suggesting the need to revisit effective weed control programs and investigate alternative herbicide chemistries for downy brome management.</p><p>Pyroxasulfone is a relatively new soil-applied premergence (PRE) herbicide that acts as a root/shoot growth inhibitor in germinating seedlings of both grassy and broadleaf weeds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref20">20</xref>] . It is registered in several crops including wheat, corn (Zea mays L.), soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.), and dry bean [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref23">23</xref>] . Pyroxasulfone applied PRE in wheat controls grass weeds such as, Italian ryegrass (Lolium perenne ssp. multiflorum) and rigid ryegrass (Loliumrigidum) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref25">25</xref>] . However, there is very little information available on the effectiveness of pyroxasulfone for downy brome management in wheat. The objectives of this research were: 1) to evaluate pyroxasulfone applied PRE standalone or followed by (fb) a standard POST herbicide program; 2) compare the effectiveness of pyroxasulfone with other standard preplant (PP) glyphosate-based herbicide programs (standalone) or fb a POST herbicide program; and 3) compare the efficacy of pyroxasulfone formulation, rate and application timing for crop safety and season-long downy brome injury and grain yields in IMI-tolerant (Clearfield&#174;) winter wheat.</p></sec>



<sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>Three separate field experiments were conducted at the Montana State University Southern Agricultural Research Center (MSU-SARC) near Huntley, MT, during 2012 through 2016 to achieve the aforementioned objectives (1, 2, and 3). Soil was a Fort Collins clay loam (fine loamy, mixed, superactive, mesic Aridic Haplustalfs) with a pH of 7.8% and 2.1% organic matter. Monthly mean air temperature (˚C) and total precipitation (mm) were recorded at a weather station located approximately 1 km from the test site. Plots were 3 m wide by 9 m long. An IMI-tolerant winter wheat cultivar “Clearstone CL 2” was seeded 2.5 cm deep in 19-cm rows at a rate of 67 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup> using a no-till drill in the first fortnight of October. Plots were fertilized with N-P-K using a gravity-fed broadcast spreader according to the MSU fertilizer guidelines for winter wheat production [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78933-ref26">26</xref>] . The test site for each experiment had a natural uniform infestation of downy brome at densities of 60 to 65 plants∙m<sup>−2</sup>. All herbicide treatments were applied with a CO<sub>2</sub>-pressurized hand-held sprayer equipped with four flat-fan spray nozzles (TeeJetTP8001, TeeJet Technologies, Wheaton, IL 60189) calibrated to deliver 94 L∙ha<sup>−1</sup> at 276 kPa. Herbicides used in the three experiments are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. The herbicide application rates were selected based on the labeled rates in IMI-tolerant winter wheat. In all experiments, a nontreated check was included for comparison. The winter wheat crop was harvested using a small-plot combine (Wintersteiger Ag) and wheat grain samples were cleaned, and yields were adjusted to 13% moisture.</p></sec>




<sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Pyroxasulfone Preemergence</title><p>Field experiments were conducted in 2012/2013 and 2013/2014 winter wheat growing seasons, and were set up in a randomized complete block design with four replications. The study included three fall-applied preemergence (PRE) standalone treatments, two spring-applied postemergence (POST) standalone treatments, and two PRE followed by (fb) POST treatments. PRE standalone treatments included pyroxasulfone at either 89 or 178 g∙ai∙ha<sup>−1</sup> in comparison to propoxycarbazone at 29 g∙ai∙ha<sup>−1</sup> (local standard), and were applied immediately after winter wheat planting on October 12 in 2012 and October 7 in 2013. POST treatments included imazamox at 44 g∙ai∙ha<sup>−1</sup> or pyroxsulam at 18 g∙ai∙ha<sup>−1</sup>, and were applied on May 10 in 2013 and May 14 in 2014 when winter wheat and downy brome had broken their winter dormancy and resumed growth (approximately 4- to 5-tiller stage of winter wheat). Injury data on crop and downy brome were visually assessed on a scale of 0 to 100%, with 0 representing no injury and 100 representing complete plant death at 2, 5, and 8 weeks after the POST (WAPOST) herbicide application.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> List of tested herbicides along with adjuvants</title></caption>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</body>



<back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.78933-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">USDA-NASS (United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service) (2017) Montana Agricultural Facts 2016. USDA-NASS, Helena, MT. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/Montana/Publications/Special_Interest_Reports/agfacts.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78933-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Reddy, S.S., Stahlman, P.W. and Geier, P.W. (2013) Downy Brome (Bromustectorum L.) and Broadleaf Weed Control in Winter Wheat with Acetolactate Synthase-Inhibiting Herbicides. Agronomy, 3, 340-348.https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy3020340</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78933-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Derksen, D.A., Anderson, R.L., Blackshaw, R.E. and Maxwell, B. (2002) Weed Dynamics and Management Strategies for Cropping Systems in the Northern Great Plains. Agronomy Journal, 94, 174-185. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2002.0174</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78933-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bell, A.R. and Nalewaja, J.D. (1968) Competition of Wild Oat in Wheat and Barley. Weed Science, 16, 505-508.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78933-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dahl, G.K., Dexter, A.G. and Nalewaja, J.D. (1982) Kochia Competition and Control in Wheat. Proceedings of the North Central Weed Control Conference, Indianapolis, 7-9 December 1982, 15-16.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78933-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Morrow, L.A. and Stahlman, P.W. (1984) The History and Distribution of Downy Brome (Bromustectorum) in North America. Weed Science, 32, 2-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78933-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hitchcock, A.S. (1950) Manual of the Grasses of the United States. 2nd Edition, United States Government Printing Office, Washington DC, 1051.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78933-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Rice, P.M. (2005) Downy Brome. In: Duncan, C.L. and Clark, J.K., Eds., Invasive Plants of Range and Wildlands and Their Environmental, Economic, and Societal Impacts, Weed Science Society of America, Lawrence, KS, 147-170.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78933-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Rydrych</surname><given-names> D.J. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1974</year>)<article-title>Competition between Winter Wheat and Downy Brome</article-title><source> Weed Science</source><volume> 22</volume>,<fpage> 211</fpage>-<lpage>214</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78933-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wicks, G.A., Burnside, O.C. and Fenster, C.R. (1971) Influence of Soil Type and Depth of Planting on Downy Brome Seeds. Weed Science, 19, 82-86.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78933-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thill, D.C., Beck, K.G. and Callihan, R.H. (1984) The Biology of Downy Brome (Bromus tectorum). Weed Science, 32, 7-12.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78933-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Sheley, R.L. and Petroff, J.K., Eds. (1999) Biology and Management of Noxious Rangeland Weeds. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, 428.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78933-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Blackshaw</surname><given-names> R.E. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1993</year>)<article-title>Downy Brome (Bromus tectorum) Density and Relative Time of Emergence Affects Interference in Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum)</article-title><source> Weed Science</source><volume> 41</volume>,<fpage> 551</fpage>-<lpage>556</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78933-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rydrych, D.J. and Muzik, T.J. (1968) Downy Brome Competition and Control in Dryland Wheat. Agronomy Journal, 60, 279-280. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1968.00021962006000030010x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78933-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stahlman, P.W. and Miller, S.D. (1990) Downy Brome (Bromus tectorum) Interference and Economic Thresholds in Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Science, 38, 221-228.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78933-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Heap, I.M. (2017) The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78933-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kumar, V. and Jha, P. (2017) First Report of Ser653Asn Mutation Endowing High-Level Resistance to Imazamox in Downy Brome (Bromus tectorum L.). Pest Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4673</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78933-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Park, K.W., Fandrich, L. and Mallory-Smith, C.A. (2004) Absorption, Translocation, and Metabolism of Propoxycarbazone-Sodium in ALS-Inhibitor Resistant Bromus tectorum Biotypes. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 79, 18-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2003.11.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78933-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Park, K.W. and Mallory-Smith, C.A. (2004) Physiological and Molecular Basis for ALS Inhibitor Resistance in Bromus tectorum Biotypes. Weed Research, 44, 71-77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2003.00374.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78933-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tanetani, Y., Kaku, K., Kawai, K., Fujioka, T. and Shimizu, T. (2009) Action Mechanism of a Novel Herbicide, Pyroxasulfone. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 95, 47-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2009.06.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78933-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hulting, A.G., Dauer, J.T., Hinds-Cook, B., Curtis, D., Koepke-Hill, R.M. and Mallory-Smith, C. (2012) Management of Italian Ryegrass (Lolium perenne ssp. multiflorum) in Western Oregon with Preemergence Applications of Pyroxasulfone in Winter Wheat. Weed Technology, 26, 230-235. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-11-00059.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78933-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jha, P., Kumar, V., Garcia, J. and Reichard, N. (2015) Tank Mixing Pendimethalin with Pyroxasulfone and Chloroacetamide Herbicides Enhances In-Season Residual Weed Control in Corn. Weed Technology, 29, 198-206. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-14-00095.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78933-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tidemann, B.D., Hall, L.M., Johnson, E.N., Beckie, H.J., Sapsford, K.L. and Raatz, L.L. (2014) Efficacy of Fall- and Spring-Applied Pyroxasulfone for Herbicide-Resistant Weeds in Field Pea. Weed Technology, 28, 351-360. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-13-00140.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78933-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boutsalis, P., Gill, G.S. and Preston, C. (2014) Control of Rigid Ryegrass in Australian Wheat Production with Pyroxasulfone. Weed Technology, 28, 332-339. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-13-00094.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78933-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Westra, E.P., Shaner, D.L., Westra, P.H. and Chapman, P.L. (2014) Dissipation and Leaching of Pyroxasulfone and S-Metolachlor. Weed Technology, 28, 72-81. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-13-00047.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78933-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jacobsen, J., Jackson, G. and Jones, C. (2005) Fertilizer Guidelines for Montana Crops. Montana State University Extension Service Publication, Montana, EB 161.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78933-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Walsh, M.J., Fowler, T.M., Crowe, B., Ambe, T. and Powles, S.B. (2011) The Potential for Pyroxasulfone to Selectively Control Resistant and Susceptible Rigid Ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) Biotypes in Australian Grain Crop Production Systems. Weed Technology, 25, 30-37. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-10-00091.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78933-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ostlie, M.H. and Howatt, K.A. (2013) Downy Brome (Bromustec torum) Competition and Control in No-Till Spring Wheat. Weed Technology, 27, 502-508. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-11-00033.1</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>