<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JHEPGC</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2380-4327</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jhepgc.2017.34044</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JHEPGC-78825</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Density of Vacuum-Like Plasma and Hubble Constant
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ilya</surname><given-names>A. Obukhov</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Research &amp;amp; Development Company “System Resources”, Moscow, Russia</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>i_obukhov@systemres.ru</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>28</day><month>08</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>572</fpage><lpage>587</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>August</day>	<month>5,</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>27,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>August</day>	<month>30,</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The model in which expansion of the Universe leads to a generation of non-equilibrium vacuum-like electron-positron plasma is proposed and researched. The formulas that relate the Hubble’s constant with the concentration of plasma particles and the cosmological constant are obtained. The collective properties of vacuum-like plasma are investigated. It is shown, that the coefficient of a two-photon annihilation in such plasma is nine times less than for the free particles. A simple formula for dark energy density as a function of electron mass and charge is obtained. It was demonstrated that acceleration of plasma’s chemical potential fluctuations flow proportional of dark energy density.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Non-Equilibrium Vacuum-Like Plasma</kwd><kwd> Hubble Constant</kwd><kwd> Dark Energy</kwd><kwd> Electron</kwd><kwd> Positron</kwd><kwd> Annihilation</kwd><kwd> Zero Enthalpy</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>As shown in the article [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78825-ref1">1</xref>] , under certain conditions electron-positron plasma has the zero density of an enthalpy. For this plasma the ratio is fair</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula183"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x2.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the energy density and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the pressure.</p><p>Unusual properties of such material medium are caused by the existence of the random electromagnetic field generated by transitions between various quantum states of electrons and positrons. If a constant temperature <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfies the conditions</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula184"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>the energy density <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and pressure <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of a random electromagnetic field are related to the temperature by the formulas</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula185"><label>(3.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x9.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula186"><label>(3.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x10.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are the Fermi momenta of electrons and positrons; <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are the mass and the electric charge of the electron; <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the velocity of light in vacuum; <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the Boltzmann’s constant; <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the Planck’s constant divided by<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>In order that plasma with such properties is vacuum-like [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78825-ref2">2</xref>] , it is necessary to impose the additional requirement of electro-neutrality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78825-ref3">3</xref>] . In this case, the plasma becomes non-equilibrium. The sum of chemical potentials of the electrons <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and of the positrons <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is equal to zero</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula187"><label>(4.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x21.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and their difference is expressed by the ratio</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula188"><label>(4.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x22.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the fine-structure constant approximately equal to 1/137. In this case, Fermi momenta of electrons and positrons</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula189"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x24.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula190"><label>(4.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x25.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>are equal</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula191"><label>(4.4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x26.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and are connected with temperature by the equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula192"><label>(4.5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x27.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (4.5) is the consequence of the relation (1).</p><p>The electron-positron plasma, which satisfies the conditions (4.1)-(4.5), together with random electromagnetic field, is the vacuum-like material medium that has a zero enthalpy</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula193"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x28.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and zero entropy</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula194"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x29.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>too. Due to these properties, it can play the role of dark energy. However, the energy density of researched medium is negative and its pressure is positive.</p><p>The total energy density and pressure are expressed in the following form:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula195"><label>(5.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x30.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>For the energy densities of electrons, positrons and random electromagnetic field the formulas are true</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula196"><label>(5.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x31.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula197"><label>(5.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x32.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are the concentrations of electrons and positrons. If to assume that absolute value of plasma’s energy density is equal to the density of dark energy, the following estimations can be obtained:<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78825-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>If the electro-neutral plasma is in the state of chemical equilibrium, the following condition</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula198"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x38.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>is satisfied. Then the equality to zero of chemical potentials of electrons and positrons follows from the relationship (4.1) and equality to zero of their Fermi momenta from the relationship (4.3) follows too. If the density of plasma’s enthalpy is equal to zero then the relationship (4.5) is satisfied. In the case of the equilibrium state of plasma, Fermi momenta, the temperature, energy density, pressure, electron concentration and positron concentration are equal to zero. It means that vacuum-like plasma does not exist in an equilibrium state.</p><p>Thus, the necessary condition of existence of the vacuum-like electron-positron plasma is chemical non-equilibrium. The possible causes of non-equilibrium demand the clarification. The present article is devoted to this problem.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Equations of Particles Balance in Non-Equilibrium Plasma</title><p>The equations of electrons and positrons balance may be written in the following form [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78825-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78825-ref5">5</xref>]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula199"><label>(7.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x39.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula200"><label>(7.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x40.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are the flows density of electrons and of positrons;<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is a time and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a vector of spatial coordinates;<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>are the concentrations and spatial flows density of electrons and positrons; <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the velocity of the generation and of the annihilation of particle-antiparticle pairs.</p><p>In the absence of external electromagnetic fields and the constant temperature density flow, expressions are true</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula201"><label>(8.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x51.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula202"><label>(8.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x52.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Here <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is electron momentum four-vector or positron momentum four-vector for which the zero component is represented in the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula203"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x54.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula204"><label>(9.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x55.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>is the Fermi-Dirac distribution function;</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula205"><label>(9.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x56.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are the hydrodynamic velocities of particles and antiparticles [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78825-ref4">4</xref>] , for which the relations are satisfied</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula206"><label>(9.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x59.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The left parts of Equations (7.1) and (7.2) depend on coordinates and time using chemical potentials<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and using hydrodynamic velocities<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Spatial components of hydrodynamic velocities may be defined by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78825-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78825-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula207"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x64.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Components <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are calculated from the expressions (9.3). Times of momentum relaxation for electron <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and for positron <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are positive values. They define the electric resistance of medium [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78825-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78825-ref7">7</xref>] . Their physical nature and numerical values are determined by stochastic scattering of electrons and positrons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78825-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>Taking into account definitions (10) left parts of the Equations (7.1) and (7.2) depend on the coordinates and time only through the chemical potentials and their derivatives. Electrons and positrons interact with each other by emitting and absorbing electromagnetic fields. As a result at a constant temperature and under the condition of absence of external interaction, the Equations (7.1) and (7.2) must describe the relaxation of the system to the state of the local chemical equilibrium, which is determined by equality (6). If chemical potentials do not depend on coordinates and time, global chemical equilibrium reached.</p><p>Using the analogy with the theory of charge transport in mesoscopic structures we will assume that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a function of the difference between the chemical potentials of electrons and positrons, and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> equal zero in state of chemical equilibrium. We will choose this function in the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula208"><label>(11.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x71.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula209"><label>(11.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x72.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula210"><label>(11.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x73.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>are the invariant density of electrons and positrons; <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the coefficient of two-photon annihilation of electron and positron, its dimension is cm<sup>3</sup>∙c<sup>−1</sup>. Such choosing of function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> provides a relaxation of solutions of Equations (7.1) and (7.2) to the state of local chemical equilibrium (6).</p><p>The characteristic relaxation times of the concentration fluctuations determined by expressions</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula211"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x76.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where indicated</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula212"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x77.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>For relaxation time of chemical potentials difference the formula are fair</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula213"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x78.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By using, the definition (10) can be obtained the expression for characteristic distance of relaxation to zero of the difference of the chemical potentials</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula214"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x79.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In researched vacuum-like plasma when the relationships</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula215"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x80.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>are fair we obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula216"><label>(16.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x81.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula217"><label>(16.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x82.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula218"><label>(16.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x83.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The Formula (16.3) was obtained from the expression (15) with assumption that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula219"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x84.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We will use the formula for a cross-section of two-photon annihilation that was obtained by Dirac at 1930 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78825-ref8">8</xref>] for estimations. It follows that the expression for coefficient</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula220"><label>(18.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x85.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula221"><label>(18.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x86.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>is the classical radius of the electron, which is approximately equal to<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The corresponding estimation for the coefficient<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x88.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is correct. According to Dirac [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78825-ref8">8</xref>] this result is true if we neglect the interaction between particles and antiparticles.</p><p>Using Formulas (18.1) and (18.2) from expressions (16.1)-(16.3) we will obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula222"><label>(19.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x89.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula223"><label>(19.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x90.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula224"><label>(20.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x91.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula225"><label>(20.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x92.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x93.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>Time <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x93.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is approximately equal to <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x93.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and Compton wavelength is about<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x93.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. According to paper [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78825-ref1">1</xref>] the estimations</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula226"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x97.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>is correct. It means</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula227"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x98.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Such big times <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and diffusion length <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x100.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are caused by a factor<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x100.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x101.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, i.e. by the low density of plasma.</p><p>The characteristic relaxation time of the concentration fluctuations is about the age of the Universe. The time of restoration of chemical equilibrium exceeds the age of the Universe by eight orders.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Expansion of the Universe and Non-Equilibrium Plasma</title><p>The obtained results show, that in normal scales of times small deviations from the state of chemical equilibrium of electron-positron plasma can be considered as stationary. However, it relates to small fluctuations for which the estimation is fair</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula228"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x102.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The presence and long time existence of such fluctuations can't be the cause of high level of non-equilibrium plasma</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula229"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x103.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>defined by Formula (4.2).</p><p>Various external influence scan be sources of non-equilibrium plasma. For example, it may be the external electromagnetic radiation, current flow through the regions with high gradients of concentrations of plasma particles [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78825-ref6">6</xref>] , the dependence of concentration on time caused by the external reasons. The last hypothesis seems to be the most realistic.</p><p>According to the modern vision, in the current period of the cosmic history, the spatial size of the Universe increases as a function of time. The rate of this expansion is measured by Hubble's constant<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. We assume that the number of electrons and equal number of positrons of the researched plasma <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> do not depend from space and time coordinates. In this case, the expansion of the Universe must lead to a change of particles’ concentration due to the increase of volume <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> occupied by electrons and positrons.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula230"><label>(21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x107.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Taking into account the weak dependence of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x108.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> from time, generated by sources (21) non-equilibrium may be considered practically stationary.</p><p>From the Equations (7.1), (7.2) and the Formula (21) for vacuum-like plasma we obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula231"><label>(22.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x109.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula232"><label>(22.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x110.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>According to the expression (4.2) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>exceeds a unit at a size about<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then we will find plasma density from the Formula (22.2)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula233"><label>(23)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x113.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>If to use <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x114.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> defined by the expression (18.1) as coefficient<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x114.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x115.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then from relationship (23) we obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula234"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x116.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The absolute value of this density is about nine time less than experimental result <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x117.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78825-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>The electron-positron annihilation probability defined by the Formulas (18.1) and (18.2) doesn't consider the additional interaction between particles caused by random electromagnetic field and collective properties of plasma. In Introduction the formulas for the energy density of random electromagnetic field are presented. They include energy density of random field oneself and energy density of its interaction with electrons and positrons too.</p><p>The energy-momentum tensor of a random electromagnetic field, which includes the interaction with particles and antiparticles, can be represented in the form [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78825-ref1">1</xref>]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula235"><label>(24.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x118.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula236"><label>(24.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x119.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula237"><label>(24.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x120.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Here <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a vector-potential of a random electromagnetic field;</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula238"><label>(24.4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x122.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>is a tensor of this field; <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x123.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is Minkowski tensor;</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula239"><label>(24.5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x124.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>is a difference between flows of electrons <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x125.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and positrons<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x125.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x126.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Energy density and pressure of random electromagnetic field are calculated from relationships</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula240"><label>(25.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x127.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula241"><label>(25.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x128.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>is a tensor averaged by random processes of transitions between states of particle-particle, antiparticle-antiparticle, particle-antiparticle.</p><p>The tensor <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x129.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> according to the Formula (24.1) may be represented by the sum</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula242"><label>(26.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x130.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula243"><label>(26.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x131.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>are the average energy-momentum tensor of the electromagnetic field and of it’s interaction with electrons and positrons.</p><p>Using the relationships (25.1), (25.2) and (26.1), (26.2) it is possible to extract density of electromagnetic interaction potential from total expressions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78825-ref10">10</xref>]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula244"><label>(27.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x132.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Considering that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula245"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x133.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>we will find</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula246"><label>(27.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x134.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The density of potential <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x135.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> defines the contribution of a random electromagnetic field to the scattering matrix of spinor particles [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78825-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>Energy density and pressure of vacuum-like plasma may be represented in the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula247"><label>(28.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x136.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula248"><label>(28.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x137.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula249"><label>(28.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x138.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula250"><label>(28.4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x139.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula251"><label>(28.5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x140.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>are the contributions of transitions of electron-electron, positron-positron, electron-positron. The main contribution to the total energy density and the total pressure of a random electromagnetic field give the electron-electron and positron-positron transitions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78825-ref1">1</xref>] . Evaluations follow from Formulas (28.3)-(28.5)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula252"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x141.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>According to the structure of relationships (28.1) and (28.2) from (27.2), we obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula253"><label>(29.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x142.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula254"><label>(29.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x143.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula255"><label>(29.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x144.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>These expressions demonstrate that the attraction between particles with an identical sign of the electric charge is the result of random electron-electron and positron-positron transitions. The density of attraction potential is three times more than energy density of particles.</p><p>Random electrons-positrons transitions lead to repulsion between particles with different sign of the electric charge. The density of repulsion potential is much less than the energy density of plasma components.</p><p>Strong attractive interaction must lead to unusual properties of electrons and positrons gasses. For example, for researched environment the characteristic distance can be defined</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula256"><label>(30)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x145.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>at which the attraction between electron and electron or between positron and positron is balanced by Coulomb repulsion between these particles. The repulsion dominates at distances less than<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x146.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The attraction dominates at distances more than<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x146.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x147.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. i.e. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x146.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x147.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x148.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>defines the distance of stable equilibrium.</p><p>The characteristic distance</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula257"><label>(31)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x149.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>may be defined for interaction between electrons and positrons too. This is the distance at which force of Coulomb attraction force is equal to the force of repulsion force caused by random transitions. Distance <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x150.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is huge, it is about<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x150.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x151.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Ratio of distances <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x150.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x151.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x152.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is huge too-about 10<sup>34</sup>. Physical interpretations of distance <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x150.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x151.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x152.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x153.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and distance <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x150.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x151.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x152.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x153.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x154.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are different. The distance <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x150.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x151.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x152.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x153.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x154.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x155.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> corresponds to the boundary of a region outside of which electrons and positrons run up.</p><p>The distance <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x156.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is exactly three times less than the classical radius of electron defined by Formula (18.2). A simple replacement <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x156.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x157.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x156.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x157.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x158.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> leads to “proper” density value<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x156.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x157.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x158.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x159.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. But such simple change needs reasoning.</p><p>According to the condensed matter theory [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78825-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78825-ref12">12</xref>] the Heisenberg operators of electron component <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x160.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and positron component <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x160.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x161.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of vacuum-like plasma are solutions of the equations</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula258"><label>(32.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x162.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula259"><label>(32.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x163.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Here <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x164.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are the Dirac matrix and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula260"><label>(33)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x165.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using the Expressions (4.1), (4.2) and (29.1), (29.2), (29.3) from Equations (32.1) and (32.2) we will obtain the approximate equations</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula261"><label>(34.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x166.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula262"><label>(34.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x167.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Expressions (34.1) and (34.2) describe the quasiparticles of researched plasma. They are equal to the equations for a usual free electron and free positron operators in which the electron mass <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x168.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is replaced to effective mass equal<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x168.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x169.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. If to use the solutions of Equations (34.1) and (34.2) with positive energy for description of quasiparticles states and for construction of causal Green function we will obtain the well known expression for cross section of two-photon quasiparticles annihilations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78825-ref10">10</xref>] in which <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x168.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x169.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x170.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> will replaced to<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x168.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x169.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x170.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x171.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. In non-relativistic limit for probability of this process we will obtain the formula</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula263"><label>(35)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x172.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Exactly this result will be obtained if you make a change <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x173.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in Formula (18.1).</p><p>Using <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x174.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> defined by Expression (35) from relationship (22.2) for non-equilibrium level of plasma we will obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula264"><label>(36)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x175.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Assuming that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x176.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> from Formulas (36), (23) and definitions of dark energy density <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x176.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x177.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and cosmological constant <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x176.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x177.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x178.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78825-ref3">3</xref>] we will find</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula265"><label>(37.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x179.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula266"><label>(37.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x180.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula267"><label>(37.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x181.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula268"><label>(37.4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x182.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Here <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x183.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the Newtonian gravitation constant. From Expression (37.2) for concentration follows <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x183.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x184.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and from Formula (37.4) for cosmological constant follows<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x183.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x184.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x185.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>From the Formula (37.2) new representations for distance <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x186.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> can be obtained</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula269"><label>(38.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x187.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>And the ratio of distance <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x188.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to distance <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x188.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x189.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula270"><label>(38.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x190.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x191.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the distance which may be interpreted as the characteristic size of the Universe; <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x191.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x192.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is very small mass that was call the “Hubble mass” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78825-ref13">13</xref>] .</p><p>Obtained Formulas (37.1)-(37.4) and (38.1), (38.2) represent the characteristics of vacuum-like plasma as the functions of the fundamental constants and the mass of plasma components. It is interesting that obtained expressions for dark energy density and for cosmological constant do not include the Planck constant.</p><p>The Expression (37.1) for density of vacuum-like plasma can be represented in form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula271"><label>(39)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x193.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This representation is strong spatial anisotropic because<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x194.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. It corresponds to space in the form of a one-dimensional wire.</p><p>Thus, the expansion of the Universe must lead the electron-positron plasma to non-equilibrium state. Balance equations of plasma particles connect the concentrations of electrons and positrons with Hubble’s constant.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Plasma Fluctuations and Acceleration</title><p>In frameworks of ΛCDM model of cosmology for acceleration of Universe expansion the formula is true</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula272"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x195.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x196.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the radius of the world and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x196.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x197.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is its second derivative on time,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula273"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x198.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula274"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x199.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>is the critical matter density in the Universe that approximately equal<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x200.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. According to modern interpretation of astrophysical data the dark energy density is <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x200.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x201.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and we obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula275"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x202.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>that correspond to accelerated expansion of Universe.</p><p>For researched vacuum-like electron-positron plasma we obtain the another values</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula276"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x203.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>that correspond to decelerated expansion of Universe. In all cases <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x204.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> if <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x204.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x205.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is about megaparsec.</p><p>The positive density of dark energy follows from interpretation of astrophysical observations of supernovas Ia type in terms of ΛCDM model [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78825-ref14">14</xref>] . But it is not the only way of an interpretation of observed data. For instance, in article [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78825-ref15">15</xref>] was demonstrated that these observations may be interpreted in the terms of decelerated Universe expansion if assumed that in intergalactic space the index of light’s refraction is about 1.50.</p><p>The phenomenon of supernovas positive acceleration can be explained not only with the help of dark energy concept. This result may be obtained by the different versions of the Gravity Theory which are alternative to General Relativity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78825-ref16">16</xref>] . For example, it may be the model, in which the hypothetical massive classical gravitons are introduced [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78825-ref13">13</xref>] .</p><p>In this context, the hypothesis of non-gravitational nature of supernovas Ia acceleration may be considered too. For example, this acceleration may be produced by fluctuations of vacuum-like plasma that were connected with supernova explosion. The fluctuations flow is the function of the time. It means that the fluctuations move with acceleration. Of course, the source of electromagnetic radiation in this case move with acceleration too.</p><p>Let’s assume that fluctuations not destroy the plasma electroneutrality and condition</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula277"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x206.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>is true. The chemical potential <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x207.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we will present in form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula278"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x208.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Where according expressions (5.3) and (37.2) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x209.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>satisfies of formula</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula279"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x210.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Value of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x211.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> corresponds to concentration <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x211.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x212.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of plasma particles. For <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x211.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x212.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x213.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> from Equations (7.1) and (7.2) we obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula280"><label>(40)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x214.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>If fluctuations are small</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula281"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x215.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>the simple equation is true</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula282"><label>(41)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x216.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula283"><label>(42)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x217.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>is a coefficient of diffusion in vacuum-like electron-positron plasma.</p><p>For degenerate nonequilibrium plasma it is logical to assume that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula284"><label>(43)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x218.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This value is about 4.52 s. It is interesting, that value of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x219.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> correlates with the characteristic time of cosmic gamma-ray burst [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78825-ref17">17</xref>] . For <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x219.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x220.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula285"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x221.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From Equation (41) follows that the characteristic time of relaxation of plasma chemical potential in spatial independent case is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula286"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x222.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In stationary case for characteristic length of a relaxation the formula is true</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula287"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x223.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Let’s assume that in the spatial area <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x224.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in the time moment <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x224.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x225.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the fluctuation of chemical potential</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula288"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x226.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>has occurred. The positive <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x227.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> correspond to productions of plasma quasiparticles pairs and the negative <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x227.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x228.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> correspond to annihilations of quasiparticles pairs. Thus for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x227.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x228.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x229.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we will obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula289"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x230.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula290"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x231.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula291"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x232.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>is the error function. From these expressions for velocity <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x233.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and acceleration of fluctuations flow <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x233.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x234.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> along the line <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x233.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x234.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x235.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we will obtain the formulas</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula292"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x236.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula293"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x237.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Let’s estimate <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x238.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in the case</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula294"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x239.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>As the result we will obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula295"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x240.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula296"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x241.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Absolute value of acceleration <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x242.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is proportional of dark energy density and correlates with absolute value of acceleration <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x242.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x243.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> if<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x242.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x243.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x244.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>From assumption that supernova explosion is connected with vacuum-like plasma fluctuations and it produced the plasma quasiparticles annihilation follows that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x245.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. It corresponds to accelerated motion of fluctuations to the center of fluctuations area and accelerated motion of fluctuation from external observer. By more complex hypotheses it would be possible to explain the dependence of acceleration of fluctuations from distance to the observer also. But we have not any reasons for such speculations. There is enough that a vacuum-like plasma fluctuations can lead to the accelerated movement of a source of electromagnetic radiation to the right direction.</p><p>In the conclusion of this paragraph we note that in the case of “the big fluctuation” when</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula297"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x246.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (40) becomes unstable. Its solutions increase with increase of time. This situation needs the special research outside the frameworks of this article.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>Presented theoretical results demonstrate that the expansion of the Universe must lead to vacuum-like electron-positron plasma generation. This plasma may exist under the condition of violated chemical equilibrium between electron gas and positron gas only. The difference between chemical potentials of electrons and of positrons describes the level of plasma non-equilibrium. This difference turns out to be proportional to the Hubble’s constant and inversely proportional to the plasma temperature in two degrees.</p><p>Researched plasma is the material medium that consists of the electron gas, positron gas and a random electromagnetic field caused by transitions between different possible states of particles and antiparticles. Under special conditions, the absolute value of the energy density of random electromagnetic field is more than energy densities of electron gas and positron gas. In this case, the components of plasma acquire the collective properties different from the properties of an ideal gas.</p><p>The probability of two-photon annihilation of quasiparticles in this vacuum-like medium is nine times less than for free electrons and positrons. Due to this circumstance, the absolute value of plasma energy density is equal to the density of dark energy obtained as a result of interpretation of the astrophysical measurements. In researched model, the density of dark energy relates with electron mass, electron charge and Hubble constant by very simple formula</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78825-formula298"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x247.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The cause of decreasing of the annihilation probability is the attraction that created by a random electromagnetic interaction between particles with the identical sign of the electric charge. The region of the prevalence of Coulomb repulsion is reduced in three times due to this attraction.</p><p>Between particle and antiparticle having electric charges of different signs, the random electromagnetic interaction creates the repulsion. It doesn’t exert a noticeable impact on the probability of annihilation. However, under the huge distances between an electron and a positron which is about 10<sup>21</sup> cm, this repulsion exceeds a Coulomb attraction.</p><p>Thus, two spatial scales characterize the considered vacuum-like environment: repulsion (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x248.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) and attraction (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x248.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x249.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>). They differ by thirty-four orders (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x248.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x249.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x250.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>).</p><p>Analyses of small fluctuations in vacuum-like plasma demonstrated that acceleration of such fluctuations may be very big in time period about<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2180192x251.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. It means that vacuum-like plasma fluctuations can lead to the accelerated movement of a source of electromagnetic radiation. Their influence on the radiation of supernova Ia type demands the additional research. It is well known that interaction between cosmic objects and electron-positron plasma may produce very interesting phenomena [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78825-ref18">18</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Obukhov, I.A. (2017) Density of Vacuum-Like Plasma and Hubble Constant. Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology, 3, 572-587. https://doi.org/10.4236/jhepgc.2017.34044</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.78825-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Obukhov, I.A. (2016) Cosmological Constant and Energy Density of Random Electromagnetic Field. Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology, 2, 312-319. &lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/jhepgc.2016.23028</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78825-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gliner, E.B. (1966) Algebraic Properties of the Energy-Momentum Tensor and Vacuum-Like States of Matter. Soviet Physics-JETP, 22, 378-382. &lt;br /&gt; 
http://www.jetp.ac.ru/cgi-bin/r/index/e/22/2/p378?a=list</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78825-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zel’dovich, Ya.B. (1968) The Cosmological Constant and the Theory of Elementary Particles. Soviet Physics Uspekhi, 11, 381-393. 
&lt;br /&gt;http://ufn.ru/ru/articles/1968/5/m/ 
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1070/PU1968v011n03ABEH003927</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78825-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">de Groot, S.R., van Leeuwen, W.A. and van Weert, Ch.G. (1980) Relativistic Kinetic Theory: Principles and Applications. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, New York and Oxford.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78825-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Petrov, N. and Brankov, Y. (1986) Modern Problems of Thermodynamics. Мir, Moscow. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78825-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Obukhov, I.A. (2014) Nonequilibrium Effects in One-Dimensional Quantum Devices. Lambert Academic Publishing, Saarbrücken.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78825-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Edwards, S.F. (1958) A New Method for the Evaluation of Electric Conductivity in Metals. Philosophical Magazine, 3, 1020-1031.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/14786435808243244</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78825-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dirac, P.A.M. (1930) On the Annihilation of Electrons and Protons. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, XXVI, 361-375.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100016091</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78825-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chernin, A.D. (2013) Dark Energy in Systems of Galaxies. JETP Letters, 98, 353-364.  
http://www.jetpletters.ac.ru/ps/2018/article_30426.pdf  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1134/S002136401319003X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78825-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Berestetskii, V.B., Pitaevskii, L.P. and Lifshitz, E.M. (1982) Quantum Electrodynamics. 2nd Edition, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78825-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lifshitz, E.M. and Pitaevskii, L.P. (1980) Statistical Physics, Part 2: Theory of the Condensed State. Pergamon Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78825-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Umezawa, H., Matsumoto, H. and Tachiki, M. (1982) Thermo Field Dynamics and Condensed States. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, New York and Oxford.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78825-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alves, M.E.S., Miranda, O.D. and de Araujo, J.C.N. (2010) Can Massive Gravitons Be an Alternative to Dark Energy?</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78825-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hinshaw, G., Larson, D., Komatsu, E., et al. (2013) Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Parameter Results.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://lambda.gsfc.nasa.gov/product/map/dr5/pub_papers/nineyear/&lt;br /&gt;cosmology/wmap_9yr_cosmology_results.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78825-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tangherlini, F.R. (2017) A Possible Alternative to the Accelerating Universe IV. Journal of Modern Physics, 8, 622-635. &lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2017.84042</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78825-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Corda, C. (2009) Interferometric Detection of Gravitational Waves: The Definitive Test for General Relativity. International Journal of Modern Physics D, 18, 2275-2282. &lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271809015904</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78825-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Frontera1, F., Guidorzi, C., Montanari, E., et al. (2009) The Gamma-Ray Burst Catalog Obtained with the Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor aboard Beppo SAX. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 180, 92-223.  
http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0067-0049/180/1/192/pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78825-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gaina</surname><given-names> A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1995</year>)<article-title>Black Holes as Electric Condensers</article-title><source> Romanian Astronomical Journal</source><volume> 5</volume>,<fpage> 131</fpage>-<lpage>134</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>