<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JBPC</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Biophysical Chemistry</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-036X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jbpc.2017.83003</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JBPC-78820</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Low-Flow Polysulfone Hemodialysis Alters Lipoprotein Parameters, Paraoxonase Activity and &lt;i&gt;in Vitro&lt;/i&gt; Incorporation of Phospholipids
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Franciane</surname><given-names>S. Marques</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Alysson</surname><given-names>Luiz M. Da Silva</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ricardo</surname><given-names>J. C. Mattoso</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Roque</surname><given-names>Aras</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Rogério</surname><given-names>Jorge B. De Oliveira</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Júlio</surname><given-names>Cézar De Abreu Santos</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fabio</surname><given-names>D. Couto</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ricardo</surname><given-names>D. Couto</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical and Toxicological Analysis, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Bahia/UFBA, Salvador, Brazil</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Ana Neri Hospital, SESAB and Federal University of Bahia/UFBA, Salvador, Brazil</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetics at Center of Agricultural, Environmental and Biological Sciences (CCAAB-UFRB), Cruz das Almas, Brazil</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>PGBSMI/Goncalo Moniz Research Center (CPqGM), FIOCRUZ Foundation Center, Salvador, Brazil</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Naval Hospital of Salvador, Brazilian Marine Forces, Salvador, Brazil</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>rdc@ufba.br(RDC)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>29</day><month>08</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>23</fpage><lpage>38</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>July</day>	<month>20,</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>27,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>August</day>	<month>30,</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  End stage-renal-disease (ESRD) is associated with dyslipidemia and premature atherosclerosis. The study evaluates the effect of hemodialysis (HD) on HDL-remodeling between pre- and post-HD. Was conducted a cross-sectional study with 50 ESRD male patients, undergoing HD at Ana Neri Hospital, Salvador, Brazil. All individuals were on HD for at least 3 months, into a three
   
  sessions
   
  protocol for 3
   
  -
   
  4 hours per week, with a polysulfone low-flow basic-dialyzing-membrane and unfractionated-heparin. HDL Phospholipid-incorporation was measured by <sup>14</sup>C-PL-scintillation-counting, expressed as %<sup>14</sup>C-PL/mL/hour. Paraoxonase (PON-1) activity was measured by spectrophotometry using paraoxon as substrate. Cardiovascular risk ratios and atherogenic index of plasma were calculated.
   
  Total cholesterol, HDL-C and non-HDL-C increased at post-HD on all age groups, but without triglycerides (TG) changes. TG/HDL-C decreased in 30
   
  -
   
  39 and 40
   
  -
   
  49
   
  year
   
  (y) at post-HD (p
   
  &lt;
   
  0.05). LDL-C/apoB increased in
   
  &gt;60
   
  y, after HD (p &lt; 0.05). HDL-C/apo-AI increased in 40
   - 
  49
   
  y (p
   
  &lt;
   
  0.05) and &gt;60 (p
   
  &lt;
   
  0.01). On the other hand, non-HDL-C/HDL-C reduced in 40
   
  -
   
  49 and &gt;60
   
  y, at post-HD (p
   
  &lt;
   
  0.05). The linear-correlation between %<sup>14</sup>C-PL-incorporation and non-HDL-C/HDL-C was negative in 30
   - 
  39
   
  y, both at pre-HD (r
   
  =
   
  -0.90; p
   
  =
   
  0.002) and post-HD (r
   
  =
   
  -0.78; p
   
  =
   
  0.022). Linear-correlation between PON-1 and %<sup>14</sup>C-PL-
  incorporation was positive in
   
  &gt;60
   
  y, both at pre- (r
   
  =
   
  0.63; p
   
  =
   
  0.029) and post-HD (r
   
  =
   
  0.65; p
   
  =
   
  0.022). PON-1 activity increased at pre- (59
   
  &#177;
   
  30) and post-HD (73
   
  &#177;
   
  38) in 50
   - 
  59
   
  y (p
   
  &lt;
   
  0.05). The %<sup>14</sup>C-PL-incorporation was reduced in
   
  &gt;60
   
  y (p
   
  &lt;
   
  0.05), when compared to pre- and post-HD.
   
  ESRD patients undergoing HD shows important changes on lipid-profile, PON-1-activity, cardiac risk ratios and HDL-remodeling. These results demonstrate the influence of HD with a polysulfone low-flow basic-dialyzing-membrane
   
  and unfractionated-heparin on lipoprotein metabolism.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Hemodialysis</kwd><kwd> Dyslipidemia</kwd><kwd> Cardiovascular Risk Bioindices</kwd><kwd> PLTP</kwd><kwd> PON-1</kwd><kwd> HDL-Remodeling</kwd><kwd> Low-Flow Polysulfone Dialyzing-Membrane</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Cardiovascular disease is the major cause of death in end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, undergoing renal replacement therapy, such as hemodialysis (HD) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref2">2</xref>] . These individuals show various metabolic abnormalities that contribute to the development of advanced atherosclerosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref3">3</xref>] . Besides traditional atherogenic risk factors, few biomarkers have been postulated to be relevant cardiovascular risk markers in ESRD, including aspects of malnutrition, anemia, hypoalbuminemia, elevated fibrinogen levels, oxidative stress and inflammation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>Uremic dyslipidemia is a common complication in patients with chronic kidney disease, which may persist or worsen during renal replacement therapy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref5">5</xref>] . Especially in HD, lipid metabolism disturbances are characterized by reduced levels of HDL-C, apolipoprotein AI (apo-AI) and hypertriglyceridemia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref6">6</xref>] . Some studies have shown that the dialysis method used may alter lipid profile, for example, the type of dialyzer membrane (cellulose-triacetate or polysulfone) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref7">7</xref>] and the type of dialyzer buffer (bicarbonate-based or acetate) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>High density lipoprotein (HDL) acts in reverse cholesterol transport, but to perform its atheroprotective functions, HDL needs to maintain stability (structure and composition). There are some key enzymes that participate in HDL and triglyceride-rich lipoproteins metabolism, such as cholesterol esters transfer protein (CETP) and phospholipid transfer protein (PLTP) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref10">10</xref>] . The role of PL-TP in HDL remodeling is influenced by particle protein composition and triglycerides concentration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref11">11</xref>] . Some experimental trials have demonstrated the PLTP pro-atherogenic role [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref13">13</xref>] , and in humans PLTP is associated with cardiovascular complications [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref14">14</xref>] . HDL exerts multiple atheroprotective functions, among them antioxidant activity, mainly performed by paraoxonase (PON-1), by hydrolysis of phospholipids and cholesterol ester hydroperoxides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref15">15</xref>] . Patients with ESRD, shows PON-1 reduced activity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref16">16</xref>] .</p><p>By the fact that patients maintained on HD have been exposed to many heterogeneous factors that result in quantitative and qualitative lipid abnormalities, the aim of this study was to investigate possible changes in lipids and lipoprotein parameters, such as paraoxonase activity, in vitro incorporation of phospholipids by enzymes associated with HDL, and cardiovascular risk indices on patients undergoing low-flow polysulfone hemodialysis.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Subjects</title><p>A cross-sectional study was conducted with 50 ESRD male patients, selected by convenience, undergoing HD at Ana Neri Hospital in Salvador, Brazil. All individuals were on HD for at least 3 months, into a protocol of three sessions of 3 - 4 hours per week, with a synthetic dialyzing membrane (polysulfone) of low- flow (Polypure&#174;, Germane), basic dialyzing solution (bicarbonate) and heparin unfractionated (Hemofol&#174;). The origins of ESRD in those patients were: hypertension (n = 9), diabetic nephropathy (n = 7), HIV nephropathy (n = 1), chronic pyelonephritis (n = 1), polycystic kidney disease (n = 1) and unknown (n = 30). Patient’s characteristics are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. The study participants were stratified by age groups as follows: 30 - 39 (n = 10), 40 - 49 (n = 14), 50 - 59 (n = 11) and &gt;60 years (n = 15), according to the V Brazilian Guidelines of Dyslipidemia and Atherosclerosis Prevention criteria and the ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidemias [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref32">32</xref>] . The study was approved by the research ethics committee from Federal University of Bahia, Brazil.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Laboratory Methods</title><p>Laboratory tests were performed on serum samples taken before and after the dialysis session. Concentrations of total cholesterol (TC), LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides (TG), total protein and albumin were determined by enzymatic methods (endpoint and kinetic reactions). Determinations of LDL-C were performed by homogeneous direct method (LDL-C direct BioSystems&#174;, Spain). Those tests were performed with two types of equipment: a semi-automated StarDust MC15 (Diasys, Germany) and an automated LabMax 240 Clinical Chemistry Analyzer (LABTEST, Brazil). The concentrations of apo-AI and apo B were determined by immunonephelometry through a full automated analyzer, IMMAGE&#174; (Beckman Coulter, USA).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> ESRD patient’s features: age, BMI and hemodialysis treatment duration</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Feature</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >HD Patients (n = 50)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age (years)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57 (32 - 72)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BMI (Kg/m<sup>2</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.4 &#177; 3.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Duration of Hemodialysis treatment (months)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.2 &#177; 20</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>HD: hemodialysis; n: number; BMI: body mass index. Data is shown as mean &#177; sd and median (range) for age.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Incorporation of Phospholipid into HDL</title><p>The incorporation of phospholipids was determined by scintillation-counting of carbon-<sup>14</sup> labeled-phospholipids (<sup>14</sup>C-PL) on HDL recovered fraction. The PL-incorporation method was developed from exogenous substrate method (STOKKE NORUM &amp; 1971; CHANNON, 1990). For each sample, 1.0 (one) microliter of <sup>14</sup>C-PL (0.4 μCi/mL) were added to 500 microliters of serum, homogenized by vortexing, and immediately placed into an ice bath (0˚C - 4˚C) for one hour, to establish a balance between endogenous (PL) and added <sup>14</sup>C-PL. After that time, samples were incubated for one hour at 37˚C under constant agitation. Afterwards samples were cooled in an ice bath to halt reaction. So 250 microliters of labeled serum were separated to background reading, and another 250 microliters of labeled samples, were added to 250 microliters of precipitating reagent previously prepared with 0.2% dextran-sulfate and 3.0 Molar MgCl<sub>2</sub>, v/v to precipitate lipoproteins containing apoB. Subsequently, samples were centrifuged under refrigeration for 10 minutes at 3000 rpm and supernatant containing HDL was separated to beta counting. The Hidex Chamaleon, a liquid scintillation multilabel detection platform (Turku, Finland) was used to counting detection. To evaluate repeatability and avoid light scattered interferences, samples were shared into five aliquots and pipetted into interspersed 96 wells ELISA plates. In each well were added aliquots of serum and scintillation solution, Ultima Gold (High flash-point LSC-cocktail for aqueous and non-aqueous samples ―PerkinElmer, Inc., Waltham, USA), 50 and 250 microliters, respectively. HDL PL-incorporation was expressed as percentage of <sup>14</sup>C-PL/counts-per-minute/hour.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Paraoxonase (PON-1) Activity</title><p>The PON-1 activity was measured according to Senti et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref18">18</xref>] . 140 &#181;L of 0.1 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.5, containing CaCl<sub>2</sub>, 2 mmoL/L, and paraoxon, 1.1 mmoL/L, (Sigma Chemical Co.) and 7 &#181;L of serum were used. Samples were distributed in duplicate into a 96 well plate. Readings were done at 405 nm and 37˚C, using a Microplate Reader (Benchmark, Bio-Rad). For activity calculation, six readings were taken at intervals of one minute each, and results were obtained by multiplying average variation of absorbance factor.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Bioindices</title><p>The following lipid parameters were calculated: non-HDL-C (TC minus HDL-C), TG/HDL-C, apoB/apo-AI, TC/HDL-C, LDL-C/HDL-C, HDL-C/apo-AI, LDL-C/apoB, non-HDL-C/HDL-C and atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) = log (TG/HDL-C). As TG/HDL-C did not return a normal distribution for all subgroups, the log (TG/HDL-C) was used to confirm the finds. To AIP use, patients were classified according to three risk categories conventionally used, such as: &lt;0.11 (low), 0.11 to 0.21 (intermediate) and &gt;0.21 (high) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref19">19</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Statistical Analysis</title><p>A descriptive analysis was performed to obtain summary measures, and normality test (Pearson Omnibus D’Agostotino) was used to access data distribution. For data with normal distribution, parametric tests were used, but if the data didn’t attain normal distribution, non-parametric tests were used. To inferential analyses, data were considered significant when p &lt; 0.05 for a confidence interval of 95%. Preceding any statistical analysis, a Grubb’s test was performed to outlier detection.</p><p>The Pearson’s linear correlation coefficient was applied to calculate the correlation between two different parameters in the same group when data showed less dispersion around the line (homoscedasticity), and for those that showed heterocedasticity, Spearman’s linear correlation coefficient was used. Data analyses were conducted at Graph Pad Prism 5.0 (Graph Pad Software, Inc., CA, USA).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>Our data shows significant increases on TC, HDL-C and non-HDL-C level at all age groups after HD. No significant differences were observed on TG levels when compared to pre- and post-HD (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>Apo-AI was increased after HD at age groups 30 - 39 (p &lt; 0.05), 40 - 49 (p &lt; 0.05) and 50 - 59 years (p &lt; 0.01). Apo B was also increased at 40 - 49 (p &lt; 0.01), 50 - 59 (p &lt; 0.001) and &gt;60 years (p &lt; 0.05), after HD. However, apo B/apo-AI ratio shows no significant difference among the tested groups. TG/HDL-C was reduced at age groups 30 - 39 and 40 - 49 years (p &lt; 0.05), when compared pre- and post-HD. Similar results were obtained for AIP. The LDL-C/apoB ratio increases at age groups &gt;60 years (p &lt; 0.05). The cholesterol quantity per HDL particle, estimated by HDL-C/apo-AI index, was increased at age groups 40 - 49 (p &lt; 0.05) and &gt;60 years (p &lt; 0.01). The reduction of non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio was also observed at age groups 40 - 49 and &gt;60 years (p &lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><p>There was a negative linear correlation between % incorporation of <sup>14</sup>C-PL and non-HDL-C/HDL-C at age group 30 - 39 years (pre-, r = −0.90, p = 0.002, and post-HD, r = −0.78, p = 0.022, Pearson) and a positive correlation between PON-1 and % incorporation of <sup>14</sup>C-PL at age group &gt;60 years (pre-HD, r = 0.63, p = 0.029, post-HD, r = 0.65, p = 0.022). A positive correlation between PON-1 and LDL-C/apoB was also observed at age group &gt;60 years (pre-, r = 0.62, p = 0.032, and post-HD, r = 0.75, p = 0.003) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>).</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows the paraoxonase activity among different analyzed age groups. Only at age group 50 - 59 years Pre- (59 &#177; 30) and Post-HD (73 &#177; 38), paraoxonase activity increases at post-HD (p &lt; 0.05). At the other age groups no differences were observed. Was observed a significant reduction of % phospholipid incorporation in post-HD (p &lt; 0.05) at age group &gt;60 years, Pre- (12 &#177; 3) and post-HD (10 &#177; 3). Values of PON-1 activity and PL incorporation are shown as mean &#177; standard deviation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>PON-1 activity has been cited as the major antioxidant component of HDL [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref10">10</xref>] , and the loss of its reductive capacity has been noticed on HD patients as a</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Serum lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, calculated estimates (LDL-C and Non-HDL-C) and proteins concentration from ESRD patient age group’s at pre and post hemodialysis</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Age group</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >30 - 39 years</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >40 - 49 years</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >50 - 59 years</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >&gt;60 years</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-HD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Post-HD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-HD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Post-HD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-HD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Post-HD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-HD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Post-HD</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TC (mg/dL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >188 &#177; 42*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >209 &#177; 56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >156 &#177; 34***</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >190 &#177; 40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >152 &#177; 30***</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >176 &#177; 37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >161 &#177; 26**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >185 &#177; 41</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TG (mg/dL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >274 &#177; 222</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >236 &#177; 243</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >172 &#177; 98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >158 &#177; 94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >170 &#177; 85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >214 &#177; 126</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >148 &#177; 94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >149 &#177; 112</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >VLDL-C (mg/dL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44 &#177; 25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34 &#177; 15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36 &#177; 19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34 &#177; 18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34 &#177; 14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43 &#177; 23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 &#177; 18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 &#177; 22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LDL-C (mg/dL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72 &#177; 26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88 &#177; 27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68 &#177; 27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74 &#177; 39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78 &#177; 28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85 &#177; 28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68 &#177; 17**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88 &#177; 26</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >HDL-C (mg/dL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34 &#177; 14**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41 &#177; 14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 &#177; 11***</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42 &#177; 17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37 &#177; 11*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43 &#177; 14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34 &#177; 12***</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45 &#177; 16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Non-HDL-C (mg/dL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >156 &#177; 49*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >179 &#177; 64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >126 &#177; 41**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >149 &#177; 48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >111 &#177; 17**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130 &#177; 30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >125 &#177; 33*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >138 &#177; 47</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total protein (g/dL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.67 &#177; 0.7**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.7 &#177; 1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.03 &#177; 0.5***</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.72 &#177; 1.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.38 &#177; 1.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.05 &#177; 1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.28 &#177; 0.3**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.2 &#177; 1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Albumin (g/dL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.44 &#177; 0.38*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.01 &#177; 0.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.28 &#177; 0.64***</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.3 &#177; 1.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 &#177; 0.57*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5 &#177; 0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.1 &#177; 0.35***</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.4 &#177; 0.49</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>TC (mg/dL) = Total Cholesterol; TG (mg/dL) = Triglycerides; VLDL-C (mg/dL) = Very Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol; LDL-C (mg/dL) = Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol; HDL-C (mg/dL) = High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol; Non-HDL-C (mg/dL) = TC-HDL-C. Data are show as mean &#177; sd values. Pre-HD compared Post-HD, *p &lt; 0.05; **p &lt; 0.01; ***p &lt; 0.001.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Apolipoproteins and laboratory calculated indices from ESRD patient age groups at pre and post hemodialysis</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >30 - 39 years</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >40 - 49 years</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >50 - 59 years</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >&gt;60 years</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-HD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Post-HD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-HD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Post-HD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-HD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Post-HD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-HD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Post-HD</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Apo-AI (mg/dL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >146.4 &#177; 33.2*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >165.4 &#177; 35.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >141.5 &#177; 47*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >161 &#177; 45.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >112.5 &#177; 27.3**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >133.1 &#177; 29.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >151.2 &#177; 32.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >169.2 &#177; 47.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Apo B (mg/dL)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.6 &#177; 24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >107.3 &#177; 32.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.9 &#177; 32.5**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.8 &#177; 39.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76 &#177; 20.3***</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.6 &#177; 23.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.6 &#177; 24.7*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.8 &#177; 26.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Apo B/Apo-AI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7 &#177; 0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7 &#177; 0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6 &#177; 0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6 &#177; 0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7 &#177; 0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7 &#177; 0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6 &#177; 0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6 &#177; 0.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TC/HDL-C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.4 &#177; 2.9**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7 &#177; 2.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6 &#177; 2.3**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.9 &#177; 2.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5 &#177; 1.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5 &#177; 1.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.4 &#177; 3.5**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.6 &#177; 2.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LDL-C/HDL-C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3 &#177; 1.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3 &#177; 0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5 &#177; 1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2 &#177; 1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4 &#177; 1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2 &#177; 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2 &#177; 1,1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2 &#177; 1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TG/HDL-C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.3 &#177; 14.3*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 &#177; 11.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.8 &#177; 5.4*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.9 &#177; 3.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.3 &#177; 3.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8 &#177; 4.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 &#177; 8.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.2 &#177; 5.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AIP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 &#177; 0.45*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26 &#177; 0.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36 &#177; 0.37*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16 &#177; 0.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35 &#177; 0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32 &#177; 0.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22 &#177; 0.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08 &#177; 0.38</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >HDL-C/Apo-AI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23 &#177; 0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26 &#177; 0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25 &#177; 0.1*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32 &#177; 0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.31 &#177; 0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3 &#177; 0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24 &#177; 0.07**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28 &#177; 0.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LDL-C/Apo B</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78 &#177; 0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.93 &#177; 0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 &#177; 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 &#177; 0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1 &#177; 0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 &#177; 0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9 &#177; 0.3*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 &#177; 0.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Non-HDL-C/HDL-C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8 &#177; 2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.2 &#177; 1.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.6 &#177; 2.3*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.1 &#177; 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.4 &#177; 0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.4 &#177; 1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5 &#177; 1.7*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.9 &#177; 1.5</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>TC (mg/dL) = Total Cholesterol; TG (mg/dL) = Triglycerides; VLDL-C (mg/dL) = Very Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol; LDL-C (mg/dL) = Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol; HDL-C (mg/dL) = High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol; Non-HDL-C (mg/dL) = TC-HDL-C. Data are show as mean &#177; sd values. Pre-HD compared Post-HD, *p &lt; 0.05; **p &lt; 0.01; ***p &lt; 0.001.</p><p>contributing factor for atherosclerosis development [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref20">20</xref>] . PON-1 is mentioned to be present at various steps of systemic oxidative stress, both in human and animal models [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref21">21</xref>] . We found a PON-1 activity significant increase, and our results were in agreement with the finds of Schiavon et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref22">22</xref>] . They found a significant increase in PON-1 activity at pre- and post-HD, by conducting an experiment with 20 ESRD patients. Gugliucci et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref3">3</xref>] in a similar study, also found a significant PON-1 increased activity at post-HD. However, they found a negative</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> <sup>14</sup>C-PL and PON-1 linear correlation coefficient from ESRD patients age groups at pre and post hemodialysis</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ><sup>14</sup>C-PL</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="8"  >Non-HDL-C/HDL-C</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >30 - 39 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >40 - 49 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >50 - 59 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >&gt;60 years</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-HD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Post-HD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-HD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Post-HD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-HD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Post-HD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-HD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Post-HD</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >r</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >p</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.002**</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.022*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PON-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="8"  >PL<sup>14</sup>C</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >30 - 39 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >40 - 49 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >50 - 59 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >&gt;60 years</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-HD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Post-HD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-HD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Post-HD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-HD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Post-HD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pre-HD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Post-HD</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >r</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.65</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >p</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.029*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.022*</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>14</sup>C-PL = % PL incorporation/mL/hours; PON-1 = Paraoxonase activity. Pre-HD compared Post-HD, *p &lt; 0.05; **p &lt; 0.01; ***p &lt; 0.001.</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Paraoxonase activity determined by spectrophotometric method from samples of 50 patients undergoing hemodialysis; comparison between pre and post hemodialysis activities; paired t test, Wilcoxon test post; significance at p &lt; 0.05, 95% CI. Pre- vs Post-HD (p &lt; 0.05*), aged 50 - 59 years</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7100257x2.png"/></fig><p>correlation between PON-1 activity and serum concentrations of urea and creatinine. According to Gugliucci and colleagues, these results suggest another type of mechanism related to uremic toxins retention that possibly causes the</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Incorporation of PL in HDL from different age groups by exogenous substrate, an in house method. Paired t-test, post Wilcoxon test; Significance for p &lt; 0.05, 95% CI. Pre- vs Post-HD (p &lt; 0.05*), aged &gt;60 years</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7100257x3.png"/></fig><p>impairment of HDL’s PON-1 antioxidant function [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref3">3</xref>] . Rajković et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref20">20</xref>] also found a reduced PON-1 activity in patients with ESRD when replicating the in vitro experiments performed by Gugliucci et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref3">3</xref>] . The obtained results show that high serum concentrations of urea, creatinine and uric acid had no impact on PON-1 activity. So, they found that molecules retained in the serum of hemodialyzed patients with relative molecular mass lower than 10.000 Da, did not have PON-1 activity inhibitory effect [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref3">3</xref>] , but it is important to realize that PON-1 activity can be influenced by environmental factors and polymorphisms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref24">24</xref>] which could also explain the different results among studies.</p><p>The HDL atheroprotective efficiency depends on its structure and composition maintenance. PLTP is a transfer protein which has a central role in HDL metabolism due to its phospholipid transfer activity among lipoproteins [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref10">10</xref>] . In spite of that, some studies suggest that pro-inflammatory properties of PLTP may be associated with pro-atherosclerotic events [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref26">26</xref>] . PON-1 and PLTP are HDL particle’s constitutive enzymes/transfer proteins linked to apo-AI [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref3">3</xref>] . In the present study, we found a positive linear correlation between <sup>14</sup>C-PL incorporation and PON-1 activity at patients &gt;60 years, suggesting that both paraoxonase activity and HDL phospholipid transfer protein increases proportionally. Schlitt et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref1">1</xref>] , studying patients undergoing HD, found a positive correlation between PLTP activity and HDL-C, and Cheung et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref28">28</xref>] observed a positive correlation between PLTP and apo-AI. Our results show a significant reduction of <sup>14</sup>C-PL incorporation at post-HD on patients &gt;60 years, indicating a PLTP reduced activity. On the other hand, Pahl et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref29">29</xref>] found no significant difference between PLTP activity and its plasmatic mass on serum of patients with ESRD when compared to the control group. According to this author, although systemic inflammation predominates in patients maintained on HD, such findings exclude the relationship between PLTP and inflammatory response on ESRD.</p><p>Several studies have reported that apolipoproteins are effective atherogenic markers. Apo-AI is said to be antiatherogenic and apo B as an atherogenic marker, apo B/apo-AI ratio reflects the balance between potentially atherogenic cholesterol-rich apo B-containing particles and antiatherogenicapo-AI rich particles, which is proposed as an integrated measurement of cardiac risk related to lipoprotein profile [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref31">31</xref>] .</p><p>In the present study, we found a significant increase in apo-AI and apoB serum’s concentration at post-HD. However, we didn’t find apoB/apo-AI ratio significant differences among all age groups. Although our study demonstrates that low-flow polysulfone HD elevates serum levels of apo-AI and apo B, the increase does not appear to be relevant, because when we calculate the apoB/apo-AI ratio it remained constant.</p><p>The European Cardiology Society clinical guide and the European Atherosclerosis Society recommends non-HDL-C as the best estimate of cardiovascular risk, compared to LDL-C, particularly on hypertriglyceridemic patients with ES-RD [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref32">32</xref>] .</p><p>Furthermore, although apo B can be directly measured, the calculation of non-HDL-C is more practical, reliable and lower cost, and has been accepted as an apoB surrogate marker in clinical practice [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref33">33</xref>] . In spite of that, the calc of lipid ratios on hypertriglyceridemia, as non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio should be a bet- ter cardiovascular risk estimate than the isolated analysis of non-HDL-C to predict the development of CHD in patients with type 2 diabetes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref34">34</xref>] . In another observational study trying to find the best lipid parameter for prediction of CAD risk in type 2 diabetes, they show that non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio was the best CAD risk estimate when compared to LDL-C, HDL-C, non-HDL-C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref35">35</xref>] . In our study we found a significant increase of serum non-HDL-C and HDL-C concentrations on all age groups at post-HD. The non-HDL-C/HDL-C index shows significant decrease in age groups 40 - 49 and &gt;60 years at post-HD. Recently Kimak et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref36">36</xref>] demonstrated a non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio reduction in patients on HD, when compared to the control group.</p><p>At our correlation analysis, a negative linear correlation was obtained between PL<sup>14</sup>C incorporation and non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio on age group 30 - 39 years at pre and post-HD. So we found that the higher the PLTP activity, the higher the concentration of HDL-C was at post-HD. One in vitro study demonstrates the involvement of PLTP on HDL remodeling after incubation of homogeneous and spherical HDL populations containing apo-AI, cholesterol esters and triglycerides with PLTP. In that same study, the larger HDL particle’s diameter formation was seen only after 3 h of experiment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref37">37</xref>] . These results were confirmed by Van Haperen et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref38">38</xref>] . After developing a murine model of transgenic mice (over expressing human PLTP), they realized a 2 to 3 times increase of serum pre-β-HDL formation compared to wild animals. In contrast, the HDL-C plasma levels of transgenic mice were reduced by 20% - 30% when compared to the wild ones, and studies with PLTP knockout mice shows that enzyme activity deficiency causes significant HDL-C serum reduction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref39">39</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref40">40</xref>] . So far, evidence has shown that changes in serum levels of PLTP are directly related not only to HDL remodeling, but also to changes in HDL-C concentration.</p><p>Following metabolic disturbance of lipid and lipoprotein metabolism on HD patients, the uremic dyslipidemia is also characterized by the predominance of small density LDL (sdLDL) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref41">41</xref>] . Studies have mentioned the association of sdLDL with an increased risk of myocardial infarction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref42">42</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref43">43</xref>] . In our study we didn’t find significant differences in serum levels of triglyceride between pre- and post-HD, but we observed a significant increase of HDL-C at post-HD in all studied age groups, which led to a reduction of TG/HDL-C ratio on 30 - 39 and 40 - 49 years age groups.</p><p>According to Da Luz et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref44">44</xref>] , TG/HDL-C ratio classifies LDL size into two different phenotypes: if above 3.8, there’s a predominance of sdLDL (79% phenotype B) and if under that, there’s a phenotype A predominance (81%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref45">45</xref>] . In our study, despite the reduction of TG/HDL-C ratio among some post-HD age groups, the pre- and post-HD average analysis showed that was no change in LDL phenotype estimate (TG/HDL-C). Likewise, when we used the classification proposed by Tani et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref46">46</xref>] , in which the results under 1.2 for LDL-C/apo B ratio (cholesterol concentration per LDL particle) indicate the presence of sdLDL. In addition, the LDL phenotype was different at age group &gt;60 years from pre to post-HD. Although significant differences were observed between pre- and post- HD for age group &gt;60 years, the other evaluated age groups, by LDL-C/apoB ratio, did not show LDL phenotype changes. The Atherogenic Index of Plasma (AIP) has been cited recently as a risk marker for atherogenic disease since it indirectly indicates sdLDL in HD patients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref47">47</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref48">48</xref>] . Our study showed a significant reduction of AIP at age groups 30 - 39 and 40 - 49 years. In the latter, it is important to point out that according to classification proposed by Holmes et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref49">49</xref>] , was a change from high (pre) to low risk (post-HD). On the other hand, Cabarkapa et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref19">19</xref>] found a significant increase in AIP for HD patients when compared to CKD under conservative treatment and health individuals. The use of CT/HDL-C and LDL-C/HDL-C indexes is more reliable for the assessing of CVD risk than a lipid profile comprised by isolated parameters [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref50">50</xref>] . There was a reduction in TC/HDL-C ratio with a significant difference in all age groups at post-HD. Interestingly, at age groups 40 - 49 and &gt;60 years, patients changed from high to low risk category. According to Castelli et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref51">51</xref>] male patients with TC/HDL-C index values greater than 5.1 should be considered in a high coronary risk classification. Some authors have questioned the influence of dialysate buffer on serum levels of HDL-C. Jung et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref8">8</xref>] found an increase in serum HDL-C of patients on HD using bicarbonate-dialysate buffer when compared with acetate group, which results were confirmed in a similar study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref9">9</xref>] . Based on those finds, the authors justified the improvement of “atherogenic index” (TC/HDL-C) on patients undergoing HD (bicarbonate) compared to those on HD (acetate). Recent data showed that TC/HDL-C is increased in CKD patients held on HD compared to a healthy population [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref36">36</xref>] .</p><p>The plasmatic HDL is composed of heterogenous particle size lipoprotein populations which differ by their structures, compositions and biological functions. HDL heterogeneity results in different apolipoprotein and particle lipid content [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref52">52</xref>] . HDL-C/apo-AI ratio was increased at post-HD age groups 40 - 49 and &gt;60 years. These findings lead to an improvement of cholesterol load in HDL that may suggest particle size increase after HD [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref53">53</xref>] . Fernandez et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref54">54</xref>] showed that HDL-C concentration was directly correlated to HDL diameter increase. According to Vekic et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78820-ref55">55</xref>] larger lipoprotein diameter subclasses (HDL2a and HDL2b) are negatively correlated with CVD. By contrast, smaller ones (HDL3a, HDL3b and HDL3c) are positively correlated.</p><p>About the study limitations, we could not show patients characteristics and some nutritional status in detail. Data such as CRP, serum total protein, serum albumin, and dialysis efficiency such as Kt/V (a marker of dialysis adequacy), ultrafiltration volume, dry weight (DW), and the ratio of ultrafiltration volume to DW during the sessions, by the study time, were unreachable from the medical records.</p><p>In conclusion, our study demonstrates that lipoprotein metabolism and laboratory surrogate biomarkers ratios of cardiac risk were altered during HD with low-flow polysulfone dialyzing-membrane, bicarbonate and unfractionated-heparin. The hemodialysis seems to influence the HDL remodeling by altering the ability to incorporate phospholipids, and decreasing the PON-1 activity. As we now know that uremic dyslipidemia behave differently from the common ones, new biomarkers to evaluate HDL remodeling should be used to evaluate patients maintained on hemodialysis. Other studies should be conducted to overcome our limitations.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The study was supported by grants from Funda&#231;&#227;o de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia―Bahia (FAPESB)/CNPq/ MS/SESAB―PPSUS. Franciane Santos Marques was a recipient of a fellowship from CpQGM-FIOCRUZ, Bahia, Brazil.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflict of Interest</title><p>There is no conflict of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Marques, F.S., Da Silva, A.L.M., Mattoso, R.J.C., Aras, R., De Oliveira, R.J.B., De Abreu Santos, J.C., Couto, F.D. and Couto, R.D. (2017) Low-Flow Polysulfone Hemodialysis Alters Lipoprotein Parameters, Paraoxonase Activity and in Vitro Incorporation of Phospholipids. Journal of Biophysical Chemistry, 8, 23-38. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbpc.2017.83003</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Nonstandard Abbreviations</title><p>Apo: Apolipoprotein</p><p>sdLDL: Small and dense LDL</p><p>TG: Triglycerides</p><p>TC: Total cholesterol</p><p>Pre-HD: Pre Hemodialysis</p><p>Post-HD: Post Hemodialysis</p><p><sup>14</sup>C-PL: Phospholipid-14C labeled</p><p>PON-1: Paraoxonase</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.78820-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schlitt, A., Heine, G.H., Jiang, X.C., Messow, M., Blankenberg, S., Rupprecht, H.J., et al. (2007) Phospholipid Transfer Protein in Hemodialysis Patients. American Journal of Nephrology, 27, 138-143. https://doi.org/10.1159/000099943</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shoji, T., Abe, T., Matsuo, H., Egusa, G., Yamasaki, Y., Kashihara, N., et al. (2011) Chronic Kidney Disease, Dyslipidemia, and Atherosclerosis. Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis, 19, 299-315. https://doi.org/10.5551/jat.10454</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gugliucci, A., Mehlhaff, K., Kinugasa, E., Ogata, H., Hermo, R., Schulze, J., et al. (2007) Paraoxonase-1 Concentrations in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients Increase after Hemodialysis: Correlation with Low Molecular AGE Adduct Clearance. Clinica Chimica Acta, 377, 213-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2006.09.028</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yamamoto, S. and Kon, V. (2009) Mechanisms for Increased Cardiovascular Disease in Chronic Kidney Dysfunction. Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension, 18, 181-188. https://doi.org/10.1097/MNH.0b013e328327b360</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mitwalli, A.H., Alam, A.A., Al Wakeel, J.S. and Isnani, A.C. (2011) Dyslipidemia in Dialysis Patients. Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation, 22, 689-694.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chmielewski, M., Carrero, J.J., Nordfors, L., Lindholm, B. and Stenvinkel, P. (2008) Lipid Disorders in Chronic Kidney Disease: Reverse Epidemiology and Therapeutic Approach. Journal of Nephrology, 21, 635-644.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lacquaniti, A., Bolignano, D., Donato, V., Bono, C., Fazio, M.R. and Buemi, M. (2010) Alterations of Lipid Metabolism in Chronic Nephropathies: Mechanisms, Diagnosis and Treatment. Kidney &amp; Blood Pressure Research, 33, 100-110.  
https://doi.org/10.1159/000302712</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jung, K., Scheifler, A., Schulze, B.D. and Scholz, M. (1995) Lower Serum High-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol Concentration in Patients Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis with Acetate than with Bicarbonate. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 25, 584-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-6386(95)90127-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abo-Zenah, H., Sabry, A., Farouk, A., Abdelhalim, N., El-Sayed, K. and Sobh, M. (2007) The Impact of Haemodialysis-Associated Variables on Lipid Profile in Egyptian Haemodialysis Population. International Urology and Nephrology, 39, 609-618.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-006-9162-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cacciagiu, L.D., Gonzalez, A.I., Gomez Rosso, L., Merono, T., De Marziani, G., Elbert, A., et al. (2012) HDL-Associated Enzymes and Proteins in Hemodialysis Patients. Clinical Biochemistry, 45, 243-248.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2011.12.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oka, T., Kujiraoka, T., Ito, M., Egashira, T., Takahashi, S., Nanjee, M.N., et al. (2000) Distribution of Phospholipid Transfer Protein in Human Plasma: Presence of Two Forms of Phospholipid Transfer Protein, One Catalytically Active and the Other Inactive. The Journal of Lipid Research, 41, 1651-1657.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Masson, D., Deckert, V., Gautier, T., Klein, A., Desrumaux, C., Viglietta, C., et al. (2011) Worsening of Diet-Induced Atherosclerosis in a New Model of Transgenic Rabbit Expressing the Human Plasma Phospholipid Transfer Protein. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 31, 766-774.  
https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.215756</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">vanHaperen, R., van Tol, A., van Gent, T., Scheek, L., Visser, P., van der Kamp, A., et al. (2002) Increased Risk of Atherosclerosis by Elevated Plasma Levels of Phospholipid Transfer Protein. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 277, 48938-48943.  
https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M209128200</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Attia, N., Domingo, N., Lorec, A.M., Nakbi, A., Hammami, S., Ben Hamda, K., et al. (2009) Reverse Modulation of the HDL Anionic Peptide Factor and Phospholipid Transfer Protein Activity in Coronary Artery Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Clinical Biochemistry, 42, 845-851.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2008.12.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Superko, H.R. (2009) Cardiovascular Event Risk: High-Density Lipoprotein and Paraoxonase. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 54, 1246-1248.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.07.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gugliucci, A., Kinugasa, E., Kotani, K., Caccavello, R. and Kimura, S. (2011) Serum Paraoxonase 1 (PON1) Lactonase Activity Is Lower in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients than in Healthy Control Subjects and Increases after Hemodialysis. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 49, 61-67.  
https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2011.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xavier, H.T., Izar, M.C., FariaNeto, J.R., Assad, M.H., Rocha, V.Z., Sposito, A.C., et al. (2013) V Brazilian Guideline for Dyslipidemia and Atherosclerosis Prevention: Department of Atherosclerosis of Brazilian Society of Cardiology. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, 101, 22.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Senti, M., Tomas, M., Fito, M., Weinbrenner, T., Covas, M.I., Sala, J., et al. (2003) Antioxidant Paraoxonase 1 Activity in the Metabolic Syndrome. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology &amp; Metabolism, 88, 5422-5426.  
https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2003-030648</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cabarkapa, V., Djeric, M., Stosic, Z., Sakac, V., Lozanov-Crvenkovic, Z. and Vuckovic, B. (2012) Evaluation of Lipid Parameters and Bioindices in Patients with Different Stages of Chronic Renal Failure. Vojnosanitetski Pregled, 69, 961-966.  
https://doi.org/10.2298/VSP1211961C</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rajkovic, M.G., Rumora, L., Juretic, D., Grubisic, T.Z., Flegar-Mestric, Z., Vrkic, N., et al. (2010) Effect of Non-Genetic Factors on Paraoxonase 1 Activity in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis. Clinical Biochemistry, 43, 1375-1380.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2010.08.024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kennedy, D.J., Tang, W.H., Fan, Y., Wu, Y., Mann, S., Pepoy, M., et al. (2013) Diminished Antioxidant Activity of High-Density Lipoprotein-Associated Proteins in Chronic Kidney Disease. Journal of the American Heart Association, 2, e000104.  
https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.112.000104</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schiavon, R., De Fanti, E., Giavarina, D., Biasioli, S., Cavalcanti, G. and Guidi, G. (1996) Serum Paraoxonase Activity Is Decreased in Uremic Patients. Clinica Chimica Acta, 247, 71-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-8981(95)06221-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Camps, J., Garcia-Heredia, A., Rull, A., Alonso-Villaverde, C., Aragones, G., Beltran-Debon, R., et al. (2012) PPARs in Regulation of Paraoxonases: Control of Oxidative Stress and Inflammation Pathways. PPAR Research, 2012, Article ID: 616371. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/616371</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gugliucci, A., Kotani, K. and Kimura, S. (2012) Paraoxonase 1 in Chronic Kidney Failure. Journal of Lipids, 2012, Article ID: 726048.  
https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/726048</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yan, D., Navab, M., Bruce, C., Fogelman, A.M. and Jiang, X.C. (2004) PLTP Deficiency Improves the Anti-Inflammatory Properties of HDL and Reduces the Ability of LDL to Induce Monocyte Chemotactic Activity. The Journal of Lipid Research, 45, 1852-1858. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.M400053-JLR200</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schlitt, A., Liu, J., Yan, D., Mondragon-Escorpizo, M., Norin, A.J. and Jiang, X.C. (2005) Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Phospholipid Transfer Protein (PLTP) Deficiency in Mice. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1733, 187-191.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2004.12.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cheung, M.C., Wolfbauer, G., Brown, B.G. and Albers, J.J. (1999) Relationship between Plasma Phospholipid Transfer Protein Activity and HDL Subclasses among Patients with Low HDL and Cardiovascular Disease. Atherosclerosis, 142, 201-205.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9150(98)00190-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cheung, M.C., Brown, B.G., Marino Larsen, E.K., Frutkin, A.D., O'Brien, K.D. and Albers, J.J. (2006) Phospholipid Transfer Protein Activity Is Associated with Inflammatory Markers in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1762, 131-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2005.09.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pahl, M.V., Ni, Z., Sepassi, L., Moradi, H. and Vaziri, N.D. (2009) Plasma Phospholipid Transfer Protein, Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein and Lecithin:Cholesterol Acyltransferase in End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 24, 2541-2546. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfp120</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huang, F., Yang, Z., Xu, B., Bi, Y., Xu, M., Xu, Y., et al. (2013) Both Serum Apolipoprotein B and the Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-I Ratio Are Associated with Carotid Intima-Media Thickness. PLoS ONE, 8, e54628.  
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054628</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Walldius, G., Jungner, I., Aastveit, A.H., Holme, I., Furberg, C.D. and Sniderman, A.D. (2004) The apoB/apoA-I Ratio Is Better than the Cholesterol Ratios to Estimate the Balance between Plasma Proatherogenic and Antiatherogenic Lipoproteins and to Predict Coronary Risk. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 42, 1355-1363. https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2004.254</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Catapano, A.L., Graham, I., De Backer, G., Wiklund, O., Chapman, M.J., Drexel, H., et al. (2016) ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias the Task Force for the Management of Dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS)—Developed with the Special Contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention &amp; Rehabilitation (EACPR). European Heart Journal, 1-72. [In Press]</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Peters, A.L. (2008) Clinical Relevance of Non-HDL Cholesterol in Patients with Diabetes. Clinical Diabetes, 26, 3-7. https://doi.org/10.2337/diaclin.26.1.3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Holman, R.R., Coleman, R.L., Shine, B.S. and Stevens, R.J. (2005) Non-HDL Cholesterol Is Less Informative than the Total-to-HDL Cholesterol Ratio in Predicting Cardiovascular Risk in Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care, 28, 1796-1797.  
https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.28.7.1796</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eliasson, B., Cederholm, J., Eeg-Olofsson, K., Svensson, A.M., Zethelius, B. and Gudbjornsdottir, S. (2011) Clinical Usefulness of Different Lipid Measures for Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease in Type 2 Diabetes: A Report from the Swedish National Diabetes Register. Diabetes Care, 34, 2095-2100.  
https://doi.org/10.2337/dc11-0209</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kimak, E., Halabis, M., Baranowicz-Gaszczyk, I., Solski, J. and Ksiazek, A. (2011) Association between Moderately Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein and High-Density Lipoprotein Particle Subclass Distribution in Hemodialyzed and Post-Renal Transplant Patients. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B, 12, 365-371.  
https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B1000348</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Settasatian, N., Duong, M., Curtiss, L.K., Ehnholm, C., Jauhiainen, M., Huuskonen, J., et al. (2001) The Mechanism of the Remodeling of High Density Lipoproteins by Phospholipid Transfer Protein. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 276, 26898-26905. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M010708200</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">van Haperen, R., van Tol, A., Vermeulen, P., Jauhiainen, M., van Gent, T., van den Berg, P., et al. (2000) Human Plasma Phospholipid Transfer Protein Increases the Antiatherogenic Potential of High Density Lipoproteins in Transgenic Mice. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 20, 1082-1088.  
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.ATV.20.4.1082</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yazdanyar, A., Yeang, C. and Jiang, X.-C. (2011) Role of Phospholipid Transfer Protein in High-Density Lipoprotein-Mediated Reverse Cholesterol Transport. Current Atherosclerosis Reports, 13, 242-248.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-011-0172-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dullaart, R.P., van Tol, A. and Dallinga-Thie, G.M. (2013) Phospholipid Transfer Protein, an Emerging Cardiometabolic Risk Marker: Is It Time to Intervene? Atherosclerosis, 228, 38-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.01.043</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tsimihodimos, V., Mitrogianni, Z. and Elisaf, M. (2011) Dyslipidemia Associated with Chronic Kidney Disease. Open Cardiovascular Medicine Journal, 5, 41-48.  
https://doi.org/10.2174/1874192401105010041</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tsunoda, F., Koba, S., Hirano, T., Ban, Y., Iso, Y., Suzuki, H., et al. (2004) Association between Small Dense Low-Density Lipoprotein and Postprandial Accumulation of Triglyceride-Rich Remnant-Like Particles in Normotriglyceridemic Patients with Myocardial Infarction. Circulation Journal, 68, 1165-1172.  
https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.68.1165</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Koba, S., Hirano, T., Murayama, S., Kotani, T., Tsunoda, F., Iso, Y., et al. (2003) Small Dense LDL Phenotype Is Associated with Postprandial Increases of Large VLDL and Remnant-Like Particles in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction. Atherosclerosis, 170, 131-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9150(03)00245-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Da Luz, P.L., Favarato, D., Faria-Neto Junior, J.R., Lemos, P. and Chagas, A.C.P. (2008) High Ratio of Triglycerides to HDL-Cholesterol Predicts Extensive Coronary Disease. Clinics, 63, 427-432. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322008000400003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rizzo, M., Barbagallo, C.M., Severino, M., Polizzi, F., Onorato, F., Noto, D., et al. (2003) Low-Density-Lipoprotein Peak Particle Size in a Mediterranean Population. European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 33, 126-133.  
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2362.2003.01125.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tani, S., Saito, Y., Anazawa, T., Kawamata, H., Furuya, S., Takahashi, H., et al. (2011) Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol/Apolipoprotein B Ratio May Be a Useful Index That Differs in Statin-Treated Patients with and without Coronary Artery Disease: A Case Control Study. International Heart Journal, 52, 343-347.  
https://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.52.343</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Erdur, M.F., Tonbul, H.Z., Ozbiner, H., Ozcicek, A., Ozcicek, F., Akbas, E.M., et al. (2013) The Relationship between Atherogenic Index of Plasma and Epicardial Adipose Tissue in Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis Patients. Renal Failure, 35, 1193-1198. https://doi.org/10.3109/0886022X.2013.823826</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yildiz, G., Duman, A., Aydin, H., Yilmaz, A., Hur, E., Magden, K., et al. (2013) Evaluation of Association between Atherogenic Index of Plasma and Intima-Media thickness of the Carotid Artery for Subclinic Atherosclerosis in Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis. Hemodialysis International, 17, 397-405.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/hdi.12041</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Holmes, D.T., Frohlich, J. and Buhr, K.A. (2008) The Concept of Precision Extended to the Atherogenic Index of Plasma. Clinical Biochemistry, 41, 631-635.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2008.01.023</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yang, D., Liu, X. and Xiang, M. (2011) The Correlation between Lipids Ratio and Degree of Coronary Artery Stenosis. High Blood Pressure &amp; Cardiovascular Prevention, 18, 53-56. https://doi.org/10.2165/11593480-000000000-00000</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Castelli, W.P., Abbott, R.D. and McNamara, P.M. (1983) Summary Estimates of Cholesterol Used to Predict Coronary Heart Disease. Circulation, 67, 730-734.  
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.67.4.730</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Camont, L., Chapman, M.J. and Kontush, A. (2011) Biological Activities of HDL Subpopulations and Their Relevance to Cardiovascular Disease. Trends in Molecular Medicine, 17, 594-603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2011.05.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abbasi, A., Corpeleijn, E., Gansevoort, R.T., Gans, R.O., Hillege, H.L., Stolk, R.P., et al. (2013) Role of HDL Cholesterol and Estimates of HDL Particle Composition in Future Development of Type 2 Diabetes in the General Population: The PREVEND Study. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology &amp; Metabolism, 98, E1352-E1359.  
https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2013-1680</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fernandez, M.L., Jones, J.J., Ackerman, D., Barona, J., Calle, M., Comperatore, M.V., et al. (2010) Low HDL Cholesterol Is Associated with Increased Atherogenic Lipoproteins and Insulin Resistance in Women Classified with Metabolic Syndrome. Nutrition Research and Practice, 4, 492-498.  
https://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2010.4.6.492</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78820-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vekic, J., Kotur-Stevuljevic, J., Jelic-Ivanovic, Z., Spasic, S., Spasojevic-Kalimanovska, V., Topic, A., et al. (2007) Association of Oxidative Stress and PON1 with LDL and HDL Particle Size in Middle-Aged Subjects. European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 37, 715-723. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2362.2007.01849.x</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>