<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2017.89155</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-78674</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Analysis of Simple Sequence Repeats Information from Floral Expressed Sequence Tags Resources of Papaya (&lt;i&gt;Carica papaya&lt;/i&gt; L.)
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Priyanka</surname><given-names>Priyanka</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dileep</surname><given-names>Kumar</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Anurag</surname><given-names>Yadav</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kusum</surname><given-names>Yadav</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>U.</surname><given-names>N. Dwivedi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>College of Basic Sciences &amp;amp; Humanities, Sardarkrushinagar Agricultural University Dantiwada, Banaskantha, India</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Biochemistry, University of Lucknow, Lucknow, India</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>anukusum@gmail.com(KY)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>02</day><month>08</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>09</issue><fpage>2315</fpage><lpage>2331</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>July</day>	<month>27,</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>21,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>August</day>	<month>24,</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Papaya (
  
  Carica papaya
   
  L.) is one of the most
   economically, medicinally and nutritionally important
   
  tropical fruit crop
  s
  . 
  Expressed sequence tags (ESTs) derived simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers are more valuable as they are derived from conserved genic portion. Development of EST-SSRs markers
   
  through 
  
  in silico 
  approach is cheaper,
   
  less time consuming and labour-intensive.
   
  In this study, we aimed to
   mine SSRs and developed EST-SSR primers from papaya floral ESTs.
   
  A total of
   
  75,846 papaya
   
  floral ESTs
   
  were downloaded from public database
   
  National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). A total of 26,039 floral
   
  unigenes (7961 contigs and 18,078 singletons)
   
  were generated after assembly of these ESTs. From these floral unigenes, 433
  ,
  782 perfect SSRs, 204,968 compound SSRs and 6061 imperfect SSRs were mined, respectively.
   
  In perfect SSRs, mononucleotide repeats were most abundant (94.7%)
   
  followed by tri- (3.1%) and di-nucleotide repeats (1.7%). The frequencies of tetra-, hexa- and penta-nucleotide repeats accounted for only (0.17%), (0.04%) and
   
  (0.03%), respectively. In mononucleotide repeats, the most abundant motif was A/T (69.3%) and in di-
   
  and
   
  tri-nucleotide repeats were AG/CT (61%) and AAG/CTT (31%), respectively. In imperfect SSRs, mononucleotide repeats
   
  (56.5%)
   
  were most abundant.
   
  176 different types of motifs were identified. A total of 3807 primer pairs for floral papaya ESTs were successfully designed. These developed EST-SSR primers are being used for the genetic improvement of papaya such as study of cross-transferability across genera/species, evaluation of genetic diversity, and identification of sex-specific markers. These EST derived SSRs can also be used in filling gaps in existing linkage maps in papaya.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Papaya (&lt;i&gt;Carica papaya&lt;/i&gt; L.)</kwd><kwd> &lt;i&gt;In Silico&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Simple Sequence Repeats</kwd><kwd> Expressed Sequence Tags (ESTs)</kwd><kwd> SSR Mining</kwd><kwd> EST-SSR</kwd><kwd> SSR Motifs</kwd><kwd> Primer Pairs</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front>



<body>
<sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Papaya (Carica papaya L.) is an edible fruit crop of the family Caricaceae, originally native to Central and South America and distributed in tropical and subtropical regions worldwide. It is diploid species (2n = 18) and dicotyledonous plant. It has small genome size of 372 Mbp [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref3">3</xref>] . It is short lived, semi- woody, herb-like and perennial tropical plant. The fruit production starts after nine to ten months from germination period [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>According to the percentage of US recommended daily allowances, papaya fruit ranked first among 35 most commonly used fruits. It is highly nutritious and contains antioxidant vitamins (A, C and E), thiamine, folate, riboflavin, niacin, potassium, iron, calcium and fibre. It contains no starch and low in calories [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref5">5</xref>] . A proteolytic enzyme, papain (EC: 3.4.22.2) is extracted from the latex of unripe fruit which is commonly used in food processing such as in tenderization of meat, to clarify beer and juice and in industry for making soap, shampoo, lotions, skin care products and toothpastes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref6">6</xref>] . It can also be used in several medical applications such as for digestion improvement and in treatment of fever, ulcers, muscular dystrophy and osteoporosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>It is trioecious species with three types of sex: female, hermaphrodite and male. The hermaphrodite plants are widely grown as every plant of hermaphrodite produces fruits. Female plants are commercially important for papain production, while male plants have no use except pollination [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref8">8</xref>] . Female plants needed 6% - 10% male plants in the field for the purpose of fruit production [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref9">9</xref>] . Since the use of seeds produces seedlings of unknown sex, farmers have to plant seedlings in large amount and thin out the female or hermaphrodite plants after 3 to 4 months when it is possible to identify the sex of the seedlings from their floral buds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref10">10</xref>] . If the sex of papaya is identified before their transplantation to the field at seedling stage, then a desired ratio of male and female plants (5% males: 95% females) would be achieved for cultivation and resources like planting space, fertilizers and water could be devoted to female and hermaphrodite plants. Papaya is considered as fruit model crop for genetic, genomics and molecular studies owing to their several features such as short generation time, small genome size, primitive sex chromosomes and efficient breeding system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>Microsatellites or simple sequence repeats (SSRs) are consisting of one to six (bp) tandem repeats (mono-, di-, tri-, tetra- and penta-, hexa-nucleotides), and are found in all genomes including prokaryotes and eukaryotes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref13">13</xref>] . They are also termed as simple sequence length polymorphisms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref14">14</xref>] , microsatellite [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref15">15</xref>] , short tandem repeats [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref16">16</xref>] . They are located in both coding and non-coding regions of the genome [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref17">17</xref>] . SSRs are most important over other PCR-based molecular markers like random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), inter simple sequence repeats (ISSR) and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) due to their sequence-specificity, multi-allelic nature, co-dominant inheritance, high distribution in the genome, easy detection by PCR, high rate of transferability, hyper-variability and high reproducibility [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref20">20</xref>] . The polymorphic nature of SSR was observed by Litt and Luty (1989) which is generated due to variation in repeats number. The origin and evolution of microsatellites occur due to slippage of DNA strand which creates mispairing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref21">21</xref>] and repetitive errors generated during replication of DNA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref22">22</xref>] , or unequal recombination between sister chromatids during meiosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref23">23</xref>] . The principle of polymorphism detection involves the designing of primers from flanking sequences near the portion of microsatellite repeat motif. Amplification of genomic DNA with specific primers flanking the SSR motifs is performed using PCR and running agarose or denaturing polyacrylamide gel for visualization of variations in alleles. There are two types of SSRs on the basis of their location: 1) SSRs that are distributed throughout the genome are called genomic-SSRs, 2) SSRs that are found in genic or expressed portion of the genome is called as genic-SSRs or Expressed Sequence Tags-SSRs (EST-SSRs). Genic-SSRs act as functional molecular markers because “putative function” can be determined by publically available databases via computational approaches.</p><p>There are two traditional methods for the development of genomic SSR mar- kers, 1) SSR-enriched genomic library and 2) nonenriched genomic library construction. Both the methods involve construction of genomic DNA library, following the hybridization with tandemly repeated oligonucleotides probes, cloning and sequencing of candidate clones [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref24">24</xref>] , which makes these methods of development very tedious, time consuming, expensive and labor-intensive [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref25">25</xref>] . On the other hand, with the advancement of modern genomics, genic or EST-SSRs are comparatively easier to develop as large numbers of ESTs of various organisms are available in various data banks. Availability of these large amounts of freely accessible data makes possible to develop EST-based SSR markers through database mining. The development of EST-SSRs or genic-SSRs through in silico approach is a fast, efficient, requires less cost, time and labor as compared to the development of genomic-SSRs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref27">27</xref>] .</p><p>ESTs are the short (200 - 800 bases), and single pass random sequence reads of cDNAs derived from cDNA libraries. EST-SSRs are more advantageous than the genomic SSRs due to less time consuming, easily available, cheapest to develop, detect variations in expressed portion of the genome and sequence-specificity. Moreover, EST-SSRs show high rate of transferability, which means EST-SSR markers isolated from one species, can be transferred to other related species/ genera or within the same family due to conserved genic regions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref28">28</xref>] . Therefore, EST-SSRs have been utilized in several plants for various applications such as to study genetic diversity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref29">29</xref>] , cross-transferability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref30">30</xref>] , comparative analysis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref31">31</xref>] and in linkage map construction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref32">32</xref>] . In papaya, several microsatellite markers have been developed for the study of genetic diversity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref33">33</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref34">34</xref>] and marker-assisted selection (MAS) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref35">35</xref>] , but most of these SSRs are genomic in nature.</p><p>Complete papaya genome has been sequenced by Ming et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref5">5</xref>] , which generated enormous amount of ESTs and other DNA sequences which are freely accessible at NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and the availability of several SSR mining tools like MISA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref13">13</xref>] , TROLL [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref36">36</xref>] , SciRoKo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref37">37</xref>] , Msat commander [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref38">38</xref>] , etc., makes it possible to utilize available ESTs for the development of genic SSRs which could be applied for papaya crop improvements. Only few studies of microsatellite analysis from genomic sequences [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref39">39</xref>] and from ESTs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref40">40</xref>] have been performed in papaya. Moreover, only limited genic or EST-SSR markers, which emerge from transcribed portion of the genome, therefore becomes more important, are available in C. papaya. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to develop genic SSRs by utilizing the available EST database of C. papaya. The study has following two objectives: 1) In-silico approach to mine SSRs from the available papaya ESTs from the NCBI database and, 2) to develop EST-SSR primers. These developed primers could be used for estimation of genetic diversity, cross-transferability across species and genera, in comparative-genomics study and in identification of sex specific markers in papaya.</p></sec>

<sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>The methodology of in silico mining and development of EST-SSR primers from papaya floral ESTs are shown in (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p></sec>



<sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Retrieval of Floral Papaya EST Sequences</title><p>EST sequences of C. papaya are available at NCBI (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nucest/). A total of 75,846 papaya floral EST sequences (male, female and hermaphrodite flower) before meiosis and after meiosis stage were retrieved from EST database (dbEST) of NCBI in FASTA format. These EST sequences were submitted by Ming et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref5">5</xref>] .</p></sec>



<sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. EST Sequences Processing</title><p>ESTs are single pass DNA sequences so, they are more error prone. EST sequences may contain vector/adaptor contaminations, low complexity sequences and poly-A/T tails. Therefore, EST sequences were initially screened using DDBJ VecScreen tool (http://ddbj.nig.ac.jp/vecscreen/) for identification of vector con- tamination. It detects vectors, adaptors and other suspect contaminations by NCBI’s UniVec core vector/adaptor library. EST sequences were then processed using SeqTrim NEXT [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref41">41</xref>] with its default parameters. The program takes a FASTA format sequence file as an input. It removes vector/adaptor contamination, low complexity regions and trimming of poly-A, poly-T tails from the EST sequences according to the given parameters.</p></sec>


<sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Assembly of Floral Papaya EST Sequences</title><p>All the processed floral EST sequences were assembled using SeqMan DNA- STAR Lasergene ver. 9.0 program with its default parameters (minimum matching</p><p>percent = 80%). This software provides contig, singletons and statistical information. The sequences which cannot be grouped due to their low similarity to other ESTs results in singletons. Contigs and singletons constitute non-redun- dant dataset therefore were used for SSRs identification.</p></sec>



<sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Detection of Genic Microsatellite</title><p>The potential SSRs were detected in the assembled floral ESTs by submitting the sequences to a SSR mining tool, SciRoKo 2.1 version. The minimum repeat unit was defined as 4 for mono- and di-nucleotide, 3 for tri-, tetra-, penta- and hexa- nucleotides, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref42">42</xref>] (the numbers here indicating repeat unit i.e. minimum number of times the motif was repeated). Imperfect SSR analysis was done under the mismatched and fixed penalty search mode of SciRoKo tool. This program takes a FASTA formatted sequence file as an input and produces an output file with sequence name, counts of SSR, SSR type, SSR motif, repeat number, the length of the sequence and GC content. SciRoKo is freely available on internet which can be downloaded and installed in the PC.</p></sec>


<sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Primer Designing</title><p>Microsatellites containing floral EST sequences were used to design flanking forward and reverse EST-SSR primer pairs using online software BatchPrimer3 v1.0 with default parameters (http://probes.pw.usda.gov/cgi-bin/batchprimer3/batchprimer3.cgi). BatchPrimer3 is a primer design tool based on Primer3 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78674-ref43">43</xref>] that can accept in input up to 500 sequences at a time. The major criteria for primer designing were as follows: primer length (18 - 23 bp, with optimum value 20 bp); Tm (57˚C - 63˚C, with optimum value 60˚C); GC content (40% - 60%, with the optimum value 50%); maximum Tm difference between forward and reverse primer 1.5˚C and product size range (100 - 300 bp with optimum value 150 bp). Twenty eight primer pairs were custom synthesized from these designed primers by Eurofins Genomics, Bangalore, India.</p></sec>



 <sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title></sec>
 <sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Retrieval, Processing and Assembly of Papaya Floral ESTs</title><p>A total of 75,846 papaya floral ESTs were downloaded from NCBI in FASTA format. All EST sequences were screened by DDBJ VecScreen for identification of vector, adaptor contaminations, low complexity sequences and poly-A/T tails. EST sequences were processed using SeqTrim NEXT for the removal of these contaminations. A total of 59,522 floral EST sequences were obtained after processing (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Processed floral EST sequences were assembled using SeqMan DNASTAR Lasergene ver. 9.0 program with its default parameters. A total of 26,039 floral unigenes (7960 contigs and 18,079 singletons), were generated after assembly of papaya floral EST sequences (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). These assembled floral unigenes were further utilized for mining of SSRs.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Summary of in silico mining of EST-SSRs from papaya floral EST database</title></caption>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</body>



<back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.78674-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Araujo, F.S., Carvalho, C.R. and Clarindo, W.R. (2010) Genome Size, Base Composition and Karyotype of Carica papaya L. Nucleus, 53, 25-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13237-010-0007-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arumuganathan, K. and Earle, E.D. (1991) Nuclear DNA Content of Some Important Plant Species. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 93, 208-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02672069</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Damasceno-Junior, P.C., Costa, F.R., Pereira, T.N.S., Freitas Neto, M. and Pereira, M.G. (2009) Karyotype Determination in Three Caricaceae Species Emphasizing the Cultivated Form (C. papaya L.). Caryologia, 62, 10-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.2004.10589660</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) (2005) Consensus Document on the Biology of Papaya (Carica papaya), OECD Environment, Health and Safety Publications, Series on Harmonization of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology No. 33, France.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ming, R., Hou, S., Feng, Y., Yu, Q., Dionne-Laporte, A., Saw, J.H., Senin, P., Wang, W., Ly, B.V. and Lewis, K.L. (2008) The Draft Genome of the Transgenic Tropical Fruit Tree Papaya (Carica papaya Linnaeus). Nature, 452, 991-996. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06856</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Morton, J.F. and Miami, F.L. (1987) Papaya. In: Morton, J., Ed., Fruits of Warm Climates, Miami, 336-346.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aravind, G., Bhowmik, D., Duraivel, S. and Harish, G. (2013) Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Carica papaya. Journal of Medicinal Plants Studies, 1, 7-15.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Urasaki, N., Tokumoto, M., Ban, Y., Kayano, T., Tanaka, H., Oku, H., Chinen, I. and Terauchi, R. (2002) A Male and Hermaphrodite Specific RAPD Marker for Papaya (Carica papaya L.).Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 104, 281-285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220100693</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eustice, M., Yu, Q., Lai, C.W., Hou, S., Thimmapuram, J., Liu, L., Alam, M., Moore, P.H., Presting, G.G. and Ming, R. (2008) Development and Application of Microsatellite Markers for Genomic Analysis of Papaya. Tree Genetics and Genomes, 4, 333-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-007-0112-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ma, H., Moore, P.H., Liu, Z., Kim, M.S., Yu, Q., Fitch, M.M., Sekiota, T., Paterson, A.H. and Ming, R. (2004) High Density Linkage Mapping Revealed Suppression of Recombination at the Sex Determination Locus in Papaya. Genetics, 166, 419-436. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.166.1.419</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bedoya, G.C. and Nunez, V. (2007) A SCAR Marker for the Sex Types Determination in Colombian Genotypes of Carica papaya. Euphytica, 153, 215-220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-006-9256-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, Y.C., Korol, A.B., Fahima, T. and Nevo, E. (2004) Microsatellites within Genes: Structure, Function and Evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 21, 991-1007. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msh073</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thiel, T., Michalek, W., Varshney, R.K. and Graner, A. (2003) Exploiting EST Databases for the Development and Characterization of Gene-Derived SSR-Markers in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 106, 411-422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-002-1031-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tautz, D. (1989) Hypervariability of Simple Sequences as General Source for Polymorphic DNA Markers. Nucleic Acids Research, 17, 6463-6472. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/17.16.6463</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Litt, M. and Luty, J.A. (1989) A Hypervariable Microsatellite Revealed by in Vitro Amplification of a Dinucleotide Repeat within the Cardiac Muscle Actin Gene. American Journal of Human Genetics, 44, 397-401.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Edwards, A., Civitello, A., Hammond, H.A. and Caskey, C.T. (1991) DNA Typing and Genetic Mapping with Trimeric and Tetrameric Tandem Repeats. American Journal of Human Genetics, 49, 746-756.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Toth, G., Gaspari, Z. and Jurka, J. (2000) Microsatellites in Different Eukaryotic Genomes: Survey and Analysis. Genome Research, 10, 967-981. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.10.7.967</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kalia, R.K., Rai, M.K., Kalia, S., Singh, R. and Dhawan, A.K. (2011) Microsatellite Markers: An Overview of the Recent Progress in Plants. Euphytica, 177, 309-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-010-0286-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Powell, W., Machray, G.C. and Provan, J. (1996) Polymorphism Revealed by Simple Sequence Repeats. Trends in Plant Science, 1, 215-222.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zane, L., Bargelloni, L. and Patarnello, T. (2002) Strategies for Microsatellite Isolation: A Review. Molecular Ecology, 11, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01418.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Levinson, G. and Gutman, G.A. (1987) Slipped-Strand Mispairing: A Major Mechanism for DNA Sequence Evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 4, 203-221.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Katti, M.V., Ranjekar, P.K. and Gupta, V.S. (2001) Differential Distribution of Simple Sequence Repeats in Eukaryotic Genome Sequences. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 18, 1161-1167. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003903</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Innan, H., Terauchi, R. and Miyashita, N.T. (1997) Microsatellite Polymorphism in Natural Populations of the Wild Plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics, 146, 1441-1452.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Senan, S., Kizhakayil, D., Sasikumar, B. and Sheeja, T.E. (2014) Methods for Development of Microsatellite Markers: An Overview. Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 6, 1-13.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nakatsuji, R., Hashida, T., Matsumoto, N., Tsuro, M., Kubo, N. and Hirai, M. (2011) Development of Genomic and EST-SSR Markers in Radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Breeding Science, 61, 413-419. https://doi.org/10.1270/jsbbs.61.413</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bhattacharyya, U., Pandey, S.K. and Dasgupta, T. (2014) Identification of EST-SSRs and FDM in Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) through Data Mining. Scholarly Journal of Agricultural Science, 4, 60-69.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gupta, P.K., Rustgi, S., Sharma, S., Singh, R., Kumar, N. and Balyan, H.S. (2003) Transferable EST-SSR Markers for the Study of Polymorphism and Genetic Diversity in Bread Wheat. Molecular Genetics Genomics, 270, 315-323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-003-0921-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Varshney</surname><given-names> R.K.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Thiel</surname><given-names> T.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Stein</surname><given-names> N.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Langridge and Graner</surname><given-names> A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2002</year>)<article-title>In Silico Analysis on Frequency and Distribution of Microsatellites in ESTs of Some Cereal Species</article-title><source> Cell Molecular Biology Letter</source><volume> 7</volume>,<fpage> 537</fpage>-<lpage>546</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anjali, N., Dharan, S., Nadiya, F. and Sabu, K.K. (2015) Development of EST-SSR Markers to Assess Genetic Diversity in Elettaria cardamomum Maton. International Journal of Applied Science Biotechnology, 3, 188-192.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Haq, S.U., Jain, R., Sharma, M., Kachhwaha, S. and Kothari, S.L. (2014) Identification and Characterization of Microsatellites in Expressed Sequence Tags and Their Cross Transferability in Different Plants. International Journal of Genomics, 2014, Article ID: 863948. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/863948</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bhati, J., Sonah, H., Jhang, T., Singh, N.K. and Sharma, T.R. (2010) Comparative Analysis and EST Mining reveals High Degree of Conservation among Five Brassicaceae Species. Comparative and Functional Genomics, 2010, Article ID: 520238.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Studer, B., Kolliker, R., Muylle, H., Asp, T., Frei, U., Roldan-Ruiz, I., Barre, P., Tomaszewski, C., Meally, H., Barth, S., Skot, L., Armstead, I.P., Dolstra, O. and Lubberstedt, T. (2010) EST-Derived SSR Markers Used as Anchor Loci for the Construction of A Consensus Linkage Map in Ryegrass (Lolium spp.). BMC Plant Biology, 10, 177. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-10-177</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jesus, O.N.D., Freitas, J.P.X.D., Dantas, J.L.L. and Oliveira, E.J.D. (2013) Use of Morpho-Agronomic Traits and DNA Profiling for Classification of Genetic Diversity in Papaya. Genetics and Molecular Research, 12, 6646-6663. https://doi.org/10.4238/2013.July.11.8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sengupta, S., Das, B., Prasad, M., Acharyya, P. and Ghose, T.K. (2013) A Comparative Survey of Genetic Diversity among a Set of Caricaceae Accessions Using Microsatellite Markers. Springer Plus, 2, 345. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-345</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oliveira, E.J.D., Silva, A.D.S., Carvalho, F.M.D., Santos, L.F.D., Costa, J.L., Amorim, V.B.D.O. and Dantas, J.L.L. (2010) Polymorphic Microsatellite Marker Set for Carica papaya L. and Its Use in Molecular-Assisted Selection. Euphytica, 173, 279-287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-010-0150-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Castelo, A.T., Martins, W.S. and Gao, G.R. (2002) Tandem Repeat Occurrence Locator. Bioinformatics, 18, 634-636. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/18.4.634</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kofler, R., Schlotterer, C. and Lelley, T. (2007) SciRoKo: A New Tool for Whole Genome Microsatellite Search and Investigation. Bioinformatics, 23, 1683-1685. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm157</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Faircloth, B.C. (2008) Msatcommander: Detection of Microsatellite Repeat Arrays and Automated, Locus-Specific Primer Design. Molecular Ecology Resources, 8, 92-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01884.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, J., Chen, C., Na, J.K., Yu, Q., Hou, S., Paull, R.E., Moore, P.H., Alam, M. and Ming, R. (2008) Genome-Wide Comparative Analysis of Microsatellite in Papaya. Tropical Plant Biology, 1, 278-292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12042-008-9024-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zeng, F., Yu, Q., Hou, S., Moore, P.H., Alam, M. and Ming, R. (2014) Features of Transcriptome in Trioecious Papaya Revealed by a Large-Scale Sequencing of ESTs and Comparative Analysis in Higher Plants. Plant Omics Journal, 7, 450-460.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Falgueras, J., Lara, A.J., Fernandez-Pozo, N., Canton, F.R., Perez-Trabado, G. and Claros, M.G. (2010) SeqTrim: A High-Throughput Pipeline for Pre-Processing Any Type of Sequence Read. BMC Bioinformatics, 11, 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-38</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fluch, S., Burg, A., Kopecky, D., Homolka, A., Spiess, N. and Vendramin, G.G. (2011) Characterization of Variable EST SSR Markers for Norway Spruce (Piceaabies L.). BMC Research Notes, 4, 401. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-401</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Rozen, S. and Skaletsky, H.J. (2000) Primer3 on the WWW for General Users and for Biologist Programmers. In: Krawetz, S. and Misener, S., Eds., Bioinformatics Methods and Protocols: Methods in Molecular Biology, Humana Press, Totowa, 365-386.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shi, J., Huang, S., Fu, D., Yu, J., Wang, X., Hua, W., Liu, S., Liu, G. and Wang, H. (2013) Evolutionary Dynamics of Microsatellite Distribution in Plants: Insight from the Comparison of Sequenced Brassica, Arabidopsis and Other Angiosperm Species. PLoS ONE, 8, e59988. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059988</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vidal, N.M., Grazziotin, A.L., Ramos, H.C.C., Pereira, M.G. and Venancio, T.M. (2014) Development of a Gene-Centered SSR Atlas as a Resource for Papaya (Carica papaya) Marker-Assisted Selection and Population Genetic Studies. PLoS ONE, 9, e112654. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112654</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Varshney, R.K., Graner, A. and Sorrells, M.E. (2005) Genic Microsatellite Markers in Plants: Features and Applications. Trends Biotechnology, 23, 48-55.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mishra, R.K., Gangadhar, B.H., Nookaraju, A., Kumar, S. and Park, S.W. (2012) Development of EST-Derived SSR Markers in Pea (Pisum sativum) and Their Potential Utility for Genetic Mapping and Transferability. Plant Breeding, 131, 118-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2011.01926.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adawy, S.S., Mokhtar, M.M., Alsamman, A.M. and Sakr, M.M. (2013) Development of Annotated EST-SSR Database in Olive (Olea europaea). International Journal of Science and Research, 4, 1063-1073.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sahu, J., Sarmah, R., Dehury, B., Sarma, K., Sahoo, S., Sahu, M., Barooah, M., Modi, M.K. and Sen, P. (2012) Mining for SSRs and FDMs from Expressed Sequence Tags of Camellia sinensis. Bioinformation, 8, 260-266. https://doi.org/10.6026/97320630008260</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cai, C., Yang, Y., Cheng, L., Tong, C. and Feng, J. (2015) Development and Assessment of EST SSR Marker for the Genetic Diversity among Tobaccos (Nicotiana tabacum L.). Russian Journal of Genetics, 51, 591-600. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795415020064</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cheng, Y., Yang, Y., Wang, Z., Qi, B., Yin, Y. and Li, H. (2015) Development and Characterization of EST-SSR Markers in Taxodium “zhongshansa”. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 33, 1804-1814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-015-0875-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wohrmann, T. and Weising, K. (2011) In Silico Mining for Simple Sequence Repeat Loci in a Pineapple Expressed Sequence Tag Database and Cross-Species Amplification of EST-SSR Markers Across Bromeliaceae. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 123, 635-647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-011-1613-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ding, X., Jia, Q., Luo, X., Zhang, L., Cong, H., Liu, G. and Bai, C. (2015) Development and Characterization of Expressed Sequence Tag-Derived Simple Sequence Repeat Markers in Tropical Forage Legume Stylosanthes guianensis (Aubl.) Sw. Molecular Breeding, 35, 202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-015-0370-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chand, S.K., Nanda, S., Rout, E. and Joshi, R.K. (2015) Mining, Characterization and Validation of EST Derived Microsatellites from the Transcriptome Database of Allium sativum L. Bioinformation, 11, 145-150. https://doi.org/10.6026/97320630011145</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tripathi, K.P., Roy, S., Maheshwari, N., Khan, F., Meena, A. and Sharma, A. (2009) SSR Polymorphism in Artemisia Annua: Recognition of Hotspots for Dynamics Mutation. Plant Omics Journal, 2, 228-237.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Singh, S., Gupta, S., Mani, A. and Chaturvedi, A. (2012) Mining and Gene Ontology Based Annotation of SSR Markers from Expressed Sequence Tags of Humulus lupulus. Bioinformation, 8, 114-122. https://doi.org/10.6026/97320630008114</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aggarwal, R.K., Hendre, P.S., Varshney, R.K., Bhat, P.R., Krishnakumar, V. and Singh, L. (2007) Identification, Characterization and Utilization of EST-Derived Genic Microsatellite Markers for Genome Analyses of Coffee and Related Species. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 114, 359-372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-006-0440-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mishra, R.K., Gangadhar, B.H., Yu, J.W., Kim, D.H. and Park, S.W. (2011) Development and Characterization of EST Based SSR Markers in Madagascar Periwinkle (Catharanthus roseus) and Their Transferability in Other Medicinal Plants. Plant Omics Journal, 4, 154-162.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boccacci, P., Beltramo, C., Prando, M.A.S., Lembo, A., Sartor, C, Mehlenbacher, S.A., Botta, R. and TorelloMarinoni, D. (2015) In Silico Mining, Characterization and Cross-Species Transferability of EST-SSR Markers for European Hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.). Molecular Breeding, 35, 21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-015-0195-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Teshome, A., Bryngelsson, T., Dagne, K. and Geleta, M. (2015) Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Ethiopian Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Accessions with Newly Developed EST-SSR Markers. BMC Genetics, 16, 102. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-015-0261-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">He, X., Zheng, J., Zhou, J., He, K., Shi, S. and Wang, B. (2015) Characterization and Comparison of EST-SSRs in Salix, Populus, and Eucalyptus. Tree Genetics and Genomes, 11, 820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-014-0820-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Babu, B.K., Pandey, D., Agrawal, P.K., Sood, S. and Kumar, A. (2014) In Silico Mining, Type and Frequency Analysis of Genic Microsatellites of Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.): A Comparative Genomic Analysis of NBS-LRR Regions of Finger Millet with Rice. Molecular Biology Reports, 41, 3081-3090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-014-3168-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78674-ref63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Morgante, M., Hanafey, M. and Powell, W. (2002) Microsatellites are Preferentially Associated with Nonrepetitive DNA in Plant Genomes. Nature Genetics, 30, 194-200. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng822</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>