<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Geosciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2156-8359</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ijg.2017.88055</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">IJG-78588</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Multiple Proxies on the Paleoenvironment of the Early Cambrian Marine Black Rock Series in the Tarim Basin, NW China: Molybdenum Isotope and Trace Element Evidence
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chunyan</surname><given-names>Yao</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Weimin</surname><given-names>Guo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Junan</surname><given-names>Liu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hanwu</surname><given-names>Li</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Nanjing Center, China Geology Survey, Nanjing, China</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>ycyan@126.com(CY)</email>;<email>mwguo@163.com(WG)</email>;<email>junan2003@126.com(JL)</email>;<email>lihanwu@foxmail.com(HL)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>14</day><month>08</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>08</issue><fpage>965</fpage><lpage>983</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>June</day>	<month>19,</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>18,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>August</day>	<month>21,</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The early Cambrian carbonaceous shale and laminated chert-phosphorite assemble (the black rock series) are widespread at the northwest margin of the Tarim Basin, Northwest China. In combination with previously reported data, we present stable molybdenum isotope (δ
  <sup>98/95</sup>Mo), TOC, and redox-sensitive trace elements to evaluate the sedimentary conditions in early Cambrian water column during the deposition of the black rock series in the Tarim Basin. Redox variation was documented based on enrichment factors (Mo
  <sub>EF</sub>, V
  <sub>EF</sub>, and U
  <sub>EF</sub>) and redox-sensitiv elements ratios (Ni/Co, V/Cr, δU), etc. During the early Cambrian, there was transgressive event, and the sea level continues to rise. In the basal Cambrian, laminated chert-phosphorite assemble with low TOC concentrations suggest the oxic sedimentary condition in a restricted basin. Light Mo isotope values and redox sensitive elements enrichment in the carbonaceous shale layer indicate lack oxygenic sedimentary condition, and was suboxic/anoxic conditions during the transgressive phase. The hydrothermal fluids from the open ocean affected the whole deposition process of the black rock series.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Molybdenum Isotope</kwd><kwd> Trace Element</kwd><kwd> Paleo-Environment</kwd><kwd> Early Cambrian</kwd><kwd> Tarim Basin</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The molybdenum (Mo) isotope system, together with trace metal geochemistry have been taken as the indicator of the redox conditions in ancient paleo-envi- ronments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref1">1</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref7">7</xref>] . The rate and completeness of removal of Mo to sediment differs among 1) oxic (O<sub>2</sub> concentration in bottom waters, [O<sub>2</sub>] &gt; 2 mLO<sub>2</sub>/LH<sub>2</sub>O), 2) suboxic to weakly euxinic ([O<sub>2</sub>] &lt; 0.2 mLO<sub>2</sub>/LH<sub>2</sub>O, [H<sub>2</sub>S] &lt; 11 μm), 3) strongly euxinic ([H<sub>2</sub>S] &gt; 11 μm) in water-column redox facies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref9">9</xref>] . A model for interpreting primary redox environments from the δ<sup>98/95</sup>Mo of organic carbon rich mudrock deposit has been defined [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref10">10</xref>] . In fully oxic conditions, Mo would be mainly adsorbed to Mn-oxides, and little Mo enrichment below sediment- water interface [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref10">10</xref>] . In suboxic and weakly euxinic conditions, Mo isotopic fractionation might be between that of oxic and strongly euxinic sediments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref11">11</xref>] . In anoxic seawater and pore fluids, Mo is converted to the particle reactive thiomolybdate anion <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2801474x2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (x = 0 to 3) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref13">13</xref>] . In euxinic sediments ([H<sub>2</sub>S] &gt; 11 μm), Mo is turned into tetrathiomolybdate <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2801474x3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and δ<sup>98/95</sup>Mo has heavy isotope value closer to that of modern ocean water (2.3‰) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>Trace elements, such as Mo, U, V, etc., are highly sensitive to redox changes in the water column and are highly enriched in the reducing sediment, potentially making them and their ratios for important proxies for paleo-redox conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref17">17</xref>] .</p><p>The early Cambrian represents a unique period in Earth history characterized by global environment and biological changes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref19">19</xref>] . Lower Cambrian organic-rich black shales have been discovered in North America, southern Australia, parts of European, and Asia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref23">23</xref>] . A possible global ocean anoxia event could be occurred during the early Cambrian period, and numerous geochemical proxies (such as C, S isotopes), also support this suggestion.</p><p>In China, the Lower Cambrian sedimentary strata, containing black shales and cherts, occur on the Yangtze and Tarim Platforms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref27">27</xref>] . Previous research has been mainly focused on the Yangtze Platform about the paleo-environment during the early Cambrian period [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref31">31</xref>] . However, there is no equivalent research on the sedimentary sequence of the Tarim Platform. In this study, we investigated black rock series (containing phosphorite, phosphorous chert, chert, and carbonaceous shale) from the Lower Cambrian Sugetbrak section, Akesu-Wushi area, Tarim Basin. The joint application of δ<sup>98/95</sup>Mo, TOC concentrations and trace element geochemistry attempts to contribute to an understanding of the paleo-environment of Early Cambrian seawater on the Northwest China.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Geological Setting and Sampling</title><p>The Tarim Basin, located within the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region of northwestern China, is one of the largest hydrocarbon-bearing intracontinental basins in the world [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref23">23</xref>] . The Tarim Basin is surrounded by the orogenic belts of Tienshan Mountains to the north, the western Kunlun Mountains to the south, and the Central-Southern Altyn Tagh Mountains to the southeast [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref32">32</xref>] . The strata of the Cambrian in the Tarim Basin consist of the Yurtus, Xiaoerblaq and Wusonger Formations in an ascending order [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref33">33</xref>] . The Yurtus Formation unconformably overlies the dolomite of the Ediacaran Qigeblaq Formation, and conformably underlies the trilobite-bearing limestone of the Xiaoerblaq Formation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref33">33</xref>] . Lithologically, the Yurtus Formation is composed of basal black rock series and limestone above those basal rocks. The black rock series are over- and underlain by limestones, suggesting a shallow marine environment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref23">23</xref>] . The black rock series contain bedded black chert with dark colored phosphatic granule layers, and carbonaceous shale (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(c)).</p><p>The Sugetbrak section ,which is one of the well-known sections of the Akesu-Wushi area, is located in the northern margin of the Tarim Basin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(b)) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref35">35</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref36">36</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref37">37</xref>] According to paleontological studies in this area, the Asteridium-Heliosphaeridium-Comasphaeridium (AHC) acritarch assemblage zone, which was restricted to the Meishucunian Stage [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref35">35</xref>] , was found in the black rock series at the base of the Yurtus Formation.</p><p>The measured thickness of the Sugetbrak section is 2.06 m. This section consists of interbedded chert-phosphorite assemblages (1.04 m) and the carbonaceous shale (1.02 m) of the Early Cambrian Yurtus Formation in an ascending order (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(c)). A total of 12 chert-phosphorite samples and 4 carbonaceous shale samples were collected from the lower Yurtus Formation in the Sugetbrak</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> (a) Position of the study area. Modified after reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref23">23</xref>] ; (b) geological setting of the studied section and the tectonic setting. Modified after reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref37">37</xref>] ; (c) lithostratigraphy and the sampling horizons of the Sugetbrak section</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2801474x4.png"/></fig><p>section (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(c)).</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Samples Preparation and Analytical Methods</title><p>Fresh samples were directly selected indoors. The samples were washed with deionized water and ground to 200-mesh using an agate mortar for chemical analysis. Trace elements, TOC, and Mo isotope were analyzed in this study.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Trace Element and TOC Analysis</title><p>A routine HR/ICP-MS method was used. For each analysis, a 50 mg sample of 200-mesh powder was accurately weighed and placed into a Teflon dissolving can. The sample was leached with 1 mL of HF at 150˚C and boiled to dryness to remove carbonate and calcium phosphate minerals. Then, the residues were fully dissolved in 1.0 mL of HF and 0.6 mL of HNO<sub>3</sub>. The mixture was placed into a Teflon dissolving can and heated at 190˚C for at least 96 h. The solution was evaporated into an emulsion to remove excess HF. The residue was dissolved in 1 mL of concentrated HNO<sub>3</sub> and evaporated to an emulsion (this step was repeated twice). The residue was dissolved in 1.6 mL of HNO<sub>3</sub> and heated at 140˚C for 3 h to 5 h, and then transferred into a 50 mL centrifuge tube. The resultant heated residue was mixed with 1 mL of 500 ppb Rb internal standard, diluted to 50 mL, and analyzed by HR/ICP-MS at the State Key Laboratory for Mineral Deposits Research of Nanjing University. The analytical precision of elemental concentrations was generally better than 5%.</p><p>The same set of 200-mesh powder samples was analyzed for TOC composition. The powder samples were reacted with 1mol/L HCl in a water bath at 50˚C for at least 48 h (adding 1mol/L HCl twice) until no further reaction was observed. The solutions were washed with deionized water until pH 7, and the residue was dried and ground to 200-mesh. Samples were analyzed using a FLASH EA1112 elemental analytical instrument at the Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Mo Isotope Analyses</title><p>A detailed description of the analytical techniques is given in Zhang et al. (2009) and Wen et al. (2010, 2011) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref38">38</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref39">39</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref40">40</xref>] , and only a brief summary is presented here. Sample powders with an equivalent of &gt;100 ng were oxidized at 600˚C for 8 h, and then transferred to a Teflon beaker. Samples were digested using a mixture of HF and HNO<sub>3</sub> (1:2) at 100˚C for at least 16 h until the samples were completely dissolved. An improved anion/cation exchange resin double- column procedure was used to separate Mo from natural samples [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref38">38</xref>] .</p><p>The Mo isotopic measurements were performed at the State Key Laboratory of Ore Deposit Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, using an Isoprobe MC-ICP-MS. To correct isotopic drifts of the instrument, a sample-standard bracketing technique was employed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref39">39</xref>] . The working Mo standard solution was prepared from a newly standard Mo solution (NIST SRM 3134, Merck, JMC, and Aldrich). For data presentation the δ<sup>98/95</sup>Mo ratio is used. The external standard reproducibility is at or below 0.1‰ for the δ<sup>98/95</sup>Mo ratio. The value of δ<sup>98/95</sup>Mo is defined by the following Equation (1).</p><disp-formula id="scirp.78588-formula38"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2801474x5.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Analytical Results</title><p>The δ<sup>98/95</sup>Mo values, TOC, and trace element concentrations (such as Mo, U, and V, et al.) and their ratios are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Mo Isotope</title><p>Mo isotopic data are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, and their stratigraphic trend is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. The measured δ<sup>98/95</sup>Mo values of the samples vary from −0.17‰ to 1.56‰. We obtained one negative shift at the base of the Yurtus formation (N1, sample SG0904-2, 3, 4, 5, 6), one positive shift (P1) immediately with one negative shift in the carbonaceous shale layer (N2) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Trace Elements and TOC</title><p>The trace element results and their selected ratios are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. Enrichment factors are calculated by normalizing each trace element to aluminium (Al) in concentration, which is assumed to represent the detrial influx, and</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Stratigraphic distribution of elemental ratios and Mo isotopic compositions</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2801474x6.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> The δ<sup>98/95</sup>Mo values, TOC, and redox sensitive element data and ratios of the Sugetbrak section, Tarim Basin</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Samples</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Lithology</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Depth</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >δ<sup>98/95</sup>Mo</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >V</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cr</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Co</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ni</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mo</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Th</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >U</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Al</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TOC</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(m)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(‰)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(ppm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(ppm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(ppm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(ppm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(ppm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(ppm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(ppm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >178.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >143.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >202.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >371.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >184.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorous chert</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >409.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >185.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chert</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >414.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >962.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >252.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorous chert</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >686.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >164.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >710.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >227.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.49</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >704.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >167.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.94</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorous chert</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >847.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >489.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chert</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >292.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >124.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >442.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.68</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >679.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >119.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.91</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbonaceous shale</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4181.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >589.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbonaceous shale</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5571.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >693.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.66</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbonaceous shale</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2749.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >372.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.79</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbonaceous shale</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >/</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >314.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >143.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >/</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >430.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1431.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorite</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >113.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorite</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorous chert</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorous chert</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chert</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chert</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorite</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorous chert</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >266.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorous chert</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >144.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >114.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorite</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >191.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >391.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >159.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorite</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorous chert</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorous chert</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chert</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >242.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chert</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >438.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >201.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorite</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorite</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >315.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >248.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphorite</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbonaceous shale</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbonaceous shale</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbonaceous shale</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbonaceous shale</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbonaceous shale</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbonaceous shale</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbonaceous shale</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG0904-21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbonaceous shale</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>“/” means not measured.</p><p>then comparing these ratios to the normal shale [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref41">41</xref>] . The data of standard shale are from McLennan et al. (1984) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref42">42</xref>] . The EF values of several redox sensitive elements (such as U, Mo, and V) are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. The Mo<sub>EF</sub> values are from 6.22 to 438.46 (average 146.53), U<sub>EF</sub> values are from 5.73 to 1431.41 (average 182.03), and V<sub>EF</sub> values are from 3.15 to 159.89 (average 60.66).</p><p>The V/Cr ratios range from 0.34 to 5.71 in the chert-phosphorite beds, and from 2.20 to 8.04 in the carbonaceous shale layers; Ni/Co ratios are between 2.71 and 28.9 in the chert-phosphorite assemblages and from 13.4 to 24.0 in the carbonaceous shale beds (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Furthermore, δU (δU = 2U &#215; (U + Th/3)) values reveal a little more consistency, and are from 1.76 to 2, indicate anoxic sedimentary conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref43">43</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref44">44</xref>] .</p><p>The TOC concentrations in the laminated chert-phosphorite assemble are from 00.7% - 0.94%, and from 0.66% to 2.79% in the carbonaceous shale layer (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Evaluation of Detrital Input</title><p>Detrital, biogenic, and hydrogenous fractions show three independent concentrations of sediments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref45">45</xref>] . Monitoring of the detrital fraction (i.e., crustal) is necessary to assess the enrichment of redox-sensitive elements relative to their detrital component. Th is stable in the water column, and occurs permanently in the insoluble Th<sup>4+</sup> states, and largely independent of factors such as source area and grain size [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref16">16</xref>] . Therefore, it is used in the present study to monitor detrital input [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref46">46</xref>] . The lack of correlation between Th concentrations and U, and V ratios suggests no detrital influence on redox-sensitive elements (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b)).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Discussions</title><sec id="s5_1"><title>5.1. Redox Sensitive Elements Geochemistry</title><p>Trace elements (e.g., Mo, U, and, V et al.) and their ratios (including Ni/Co, V/Cr, and δU) have been widely used as indicators for paleoredox conditions</p><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Cross-plot of various parameters cited from the Yurtus black rock series unit. Th correlates with V (a), and U (b)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2801474x7.png"/></fig><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref41">41</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref47">47</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref48">48</xref>] . In anoxic waters, the Mo, U, and V values of the sediments may become highly concentrated, compared to their concentrations in sediments formed under oxygenated water columns [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref49">49</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref50">50</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref51">51</xref>] . U enrichment is minor in oxic-suboxic environments, where U is present mainly as U (VI) in the form of chemically unreactive uranyl carbonate complex [<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2801474x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref52">52</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref53">53</xref>] . Under anoxic or euxinic conditions, U (VI) can be reduced to U (IV) as the insoluble uranium dioxide(UO<sub>2</sub>) or less soluble uramium fluoride complexes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref53">53</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref54">54</xref>] . Just like U, Mo and V is also considered sensitive to conditions around the redox boundary during early diagenesis, and is preferentially enriched in sediments underlying anoxic or euxinic waters [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref49">49</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref50">50</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref51">51</xref>] . The ratios of Mo<sub>EF</sub> (average 146.53), V<sub>EF</sub> (average 60.66), and U<sub>EF</sub> (average 182.03) (EF = Enrichment Factor) reveal the relative enrichment than that of average shale, which indicate the sedimentary environment may not be oxygenic environment (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref49">49</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref50">50</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref51">51</xref>] .</p><p>Wignall (1994a, b) proposed to use the δU (δU = 2U &#215; (U + Th/3)) index to distinguish the sedimentary environment of shales, with δU &gt; 1 representing anoxic environment and δU &lt; 1 for normal marine sedimentary environment. Based on this criterion, all samples fall into the anoxic region (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref43">43</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref44">44</xref>] . Therefore, this criterion is not suitable for environment analysis of our data. It needs more rigorous criteria to constrain the sedimentary environment of the black shale series we studied.</p><p>Previous studies have established standard values for trace element ratios to distinguish oxic, suboxic and anoxic conditions (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref41">41</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref54">54</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref55">55</xref>] . Although different redox indicators have diverse threshold to indicate the redox conditions, there is general trend that V/Cr and Ni/Co ratios increase with decreasing oxygenation levels in water columns [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref41">41</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref54">54</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref55">55</xref>] . <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> reveals that the samples in the carbonaceous shale beds fall into the suboxic- anoxic sedimentary conditions area, and most of chert-phosphorite samples are also deposit in suboxic-anoxic sedimentary conditions. The same patterns could also be observed from Ni/Co vs. Mo and V/Cr, δU vs. Ni/Co and V/Cr (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). However, the lithology of the basal Yurtus Formation is kinds of phosphatic rocks, U enrichment, V enrichment, and V/Cr ratio could not be used as indicators</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Redox classification of the depositional environment</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sedimentary conditions Indicator</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Oxic</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Suboxic</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Anoxic</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Euxinic</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >H<sub>2</sub>S</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >No free H<sub>2</sub>S in the water column</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Free H<sub>2</sub>S present in the water column</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O<sub>2</sub> concentration in bottom waters [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref9">9</xref>] (mLO<sub>2</sub>/LH<sub>2</sub>O)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O<sub>2</sub> &gt; 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2 &lt; O<sub>2</sub> &lt; 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O<sub>2</sub> &lt; 0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O<sub>2</sub> = 0, [H<sub>2</sub>S] &gt; 11 μm</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >δU [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref43">43</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref44">44</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >&lt;1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >/</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >V/Cr [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref55">55</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 - 4.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >&gt;4.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni/Co [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref55">55</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 - 7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >/</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Crossplots of trace element ratios as paleoredox proxies. (a) Mo vs. Ni/Co; (b) V/Cr vs. δU; (c) V/Cr vs. Ni/Co; (d) Ni/Co vs. δU. Ranges for Ni/Co and V/Cr are from Jones et al. (1994) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref55">55</xref>] ; range for δU is from Wignall (1994a, b) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref43">43</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref44">44</xref>] </title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2801474x9.png"/></fig><p>of depositional conditions, due to the disturbance of the system by the substitution of V and U into apatite [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>Phosphorite genesis needs a favorable environment in the bottom water. Upwelling hydrothermal fluid and transgressive events could generate the proper conditions for the formation of phosphate nodules [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref16">16</xref>] . The REE results indicate that the lower Yurtus Formation shales are highly influenced by hydrothermal inputs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref27">27</xref>] . The phosphatic rocks and cherts of the basal Yurtus Formation exhibit oxic conditions with significantly negative Ce anomalies, and Ce/Ce* is in the range of 0.37 - 0.48 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref27">27</xref>] . These significantly negative Ce anomalies are generally ascribed to organic matter derived from organisms in the euphotic zone [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref26">26</xref>] . However, the TOC concentrations of phosphatic rock and cherts are relatively low (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, &lt;0.94 wt %). Therefore, organic matter may not be the main trace element source for the phosphorites and cherts. The formation of phosphorite, especially phosphate nodules, in siliciclastic depositional systems might be related to high-energy hydrodynamic regimes, reworking and redeposition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref56">56</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref57">57</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref58">58</xref>] . In addition, no sulfide was found at basal of the Yurtus Formation in the studied area. Thus, the bottom water during the early Cambrian could not be anoxic or euxin. Study on the Liuchapo Formation, southeastern Chongqing proposed by Li et al. (2015) further indicates the oxygen sedimentary conditions in early Cambrian [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref56">56</xref>] These consistent results from different areas demonstrate that oxic bottom seawater widespread in the whole basin around the Ediacaran-Cambrian boundary, and the following transgressive event induced an anoxic basin at the beginning of the early Cambrian.</p></sec><sec id="s5_2"><title>5.2. Mo Isotopic Geochemistry</title><p>Mo isotope fractionation patterns have been used to reconstruct the redox state of the Earth’s atmosphere and oceans [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref7">7</xref>] . The δ<sup>98/95</sup>Mo isotope composition of the black rock series from the Sugtebrak section, is from −0.17‰ to 1.56‰, and reveal two negative anomalies (N1 and N2) and one positive recovery (P1) over a few meters of stratigraphy thickness only (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Several mechanisms could contribute to the variabilities of Mo fraction, including: 1) the changes of the redox conditions (such as oxic, anoxic and strongly euxinic water-column). In oxygenated seawater, Mo is present as<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2801474x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and<sup> </sup>Mo isotope signature has light Mo isotopic composition (δ<sup>98/95</sup>Mo = −0.7‰), which represent a large (~3‰) negative fractionation relative to the modern seawater composition (δ<sup>98/95</sup>Mo<sub>sw</sub>) of ~+2.3‰ [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref59">59</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref60">60</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref61">61</xref>] . A growing realization that Mo isotopes could also be fractionated during removal in intermediate redox environment where O<sub>2</sub> is scarce but H<sub>2</sub>S is not abundant which is so-called suboxic or anoxic setting [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref14">14</xref>] ; 2) low-temperature hydrothermal systems. Mo may have been fractionated by precipitation of hydrothermal Fe-Mn oxides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref62">62</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref63">63</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref64">64</xref>] ; and 3) influx of riverine Mo in restricted ocean basins not fully connected to the global ocean circulation.</p><p>In the Sugtbrak section, the δ<sup>98/95</sup>Mo ratios show lighter than that present-day euxinic sediments (2.3‰) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref61">61</xref>] , and heavier than typical of Mo adsorbed onto Mn oxides (−0.7‰) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref61">61</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref65">65</xref>] , and fall into the range of suboxic sediments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). The pattern of δ<sup>98/95</sup>Mo curve has good relationships with trace element ratios (V/Cr and Ni/Co) trends (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). δ<sup>98/95</sup>Mo negative anomaly (N1 and N2) could correspond to the suboxic-anxoic conditions which V/Cr and Ni/Co ratios indicated, and the δ<sup>98/95</sup>Mo positive shift (P1, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) also could relative with the oxic-suboxic conditions. Wen et al. (2015) reported δ<sup>98/95</sup>Mo values of early Cambrian black shales, which have a wide range of δ<sup>98/95</sup>Mo values (0.27‰ - 1.79‰) in carbonaceous shales and cherts (interval 1), and are from 0.11‰ to1.70‰ in black shale layer (interval 2) in the Zunyi section, in South China [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref7">7</xref>] . Combining with Fe abundance in samples, redox elements characters, and δ<sup>98/95</sup>Mo values, the redox conditions changed from anoxic and ferruginous in interval 1, and euxinic in interval 2 have been concluded [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref7">7</xref>] . Comparison with Zunyi section, no sulfide layer was occurred in the Sugetbrak section during the early Cambrian period. At the same time, the Early Cambrian sediments were affected by upwelling oceanic hydrothermal fluids [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref27">27</xref>] . So the variation of Mo isotope in this study might not be merely connected with the suboxic or anoxic paleo-environment.</p><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Mo isotope composition of present-day seawater sources and variations of reducing sediment in Earth history [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref61">61</xref>] </title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2801474x11.png"/></fig><p>Overprint by fractioned Mo from low-temperature hydrothermal systems onto sediments could also result in the variabilities of Mo isotope composition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref62">62</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref63">63</xref>] . REE and Os isotope of the black shales give the clues of the hydrothermal overprint [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref27">27</xref>] , indicating that the hydrothermal fluid might affect the variability of Mo isotope and the Mo enrichment in our study. At the end of Neoproterozoic, the southern Tianshan Ocean began to pull-apart because of the breakup of the Rodinia suppercontinent [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref66">66</xref>] . The northern Tarim passive continental margin and southern Tianshan Ocean were developed in the Cambrian [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref66">66</xref>] . There are no deep faults developed on the northern Tarim passive continental shelf and no possibility to form local hydrothermal activity. The hydrothermal fluid in the northern Tarim continental shelf might come from extensional setting during the pattern of transgression and a rapid regional sea- level rise in the early Cambrian [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref23">23</xref>] .</p><p>Kirschvink et al. (1997) argued that marine circulation was reorganized repeatedly during the early Cambrian [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref67">67</xref>] . Nevertheless, the regional restricted basin with occasional seawater replenishment and intermittent dominance by continental input into restricted basins via riverine transport was preferred in our study. Mo contents of black rock series are generally within dozens of ppm range (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>), similar to black shales of the Niutitang Formation (a stratigraphic equivalent of the Yuetus Formation) from the Dingtai profile investigated by Xu et al. (2012), who argued that the Dingtai profile represents a restricted basinal environment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref5">5</xref>] . At the same time, geophysics, geochemistry, and stratigraphic characters also support that the Tarim Basin is a kind of regional restricted basin with passive continental margin during the early Cambrian period [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref68">68</xref>] . The remarkable variability of δ<sup>98/95</sup>Mo composition in the black rock series could be the expression the interplay between open seawater and continental input into restricted basins via riverine transport [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref59">59</xref>] . In the restricted basin, Mo influx is dominated by continental input, and is replenished by new seawater with heavy Mo restores the normal seawater situation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref5">5</xref>] . The comparatively large number of samples with δ<sup>98/95</sup>Mo below average present-day dissolved river load (0.7‰) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref69">69</xref>] , and belong to the characters of continental margin suboxic sediments (from −0.7‰ to 1.6‰) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref59">59</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s5_3"><title>5.3. Oceanic Sedimentary Environment during the Early Cambrian of the Tarim Basin</title><p>There is a long standing debate about the reason for significant changes in oceanic geochemistry during the Ediacran-Cambrian transition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref70">70</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref71">71</xref>] . Our study researches the redox sensitive elements, TOC, and Mo isotope characters of the black rock series (cherts-phosphorite assemblages and carbonaceous shale) to evaluate the changes of sedimentary condition during the early Cambrian in the Tarim Basin. A schematic model of the depositional environment of the black rock series is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>. The sedimentary condition where black rock series deposited was the restricted basin and near the continental margin. And the δ<sup>98/95</sup>Mo values also reveal the characters of continental</p><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> The schematic model of deposition environment for the black rock series</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2801474x12.png"/></fig><p>margin suboxic sediments (from −0.7‰ to 1.6‰) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref59">59</xref>] .</p><p>At the beginning of the early Cambrian (Nemakit-Daldynian age), the black rock series was drowned by a transgressive event [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref33">33</xref>] . And the sea level stayed a relative low level with the first episode hydrothermal fluid. Oxic seawater conditions in combination with nutrition provided by upwelling hydrothermal fluids induced the formation of phosphorite. Trace element and Mo isotope data suggest that interbedded chert-phosphorite assembles were scavenged from seawater under restricted conditions. The inferred scavenging process could occurred under replenishment of nutrition to the restricted basins by upwelling oxidize seawater [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78588-ref72">72</xref>] . High current or wave energy in combination with oxic seawater did not favor the preservation of organic matter, thus , the TOC contents of the basal Yurtus Formation are quiet low (0.05% - 0.94%) in cherts-phospho- rite assemblages layer. When the relatively sea level increase, the early Cambrian shallow sea became lack oxygen and become suboxic/anoxic. In the suboxic/anoxic conditions of the bottom water, the organic matter that fell from the photic zone partly oxidized because the residual oxygen in the seafloor. Thus, the TOC concentrations of upper Yurtus Formation carbonaceous shale are low (1.15% - 2.79%). In combination with the suboxic/anoxic conditions, another episode of hydrothermal activities promoted the enrichment of trace elements.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusions</title><p>Combination with previously report data and the analysis of the geochemical redox indicators, TOC concentration, and Mo isotope data from black rock series at early Cambrian in the Tarim Basin, we conclude the following:</p><p>1) During the early Cambrian period, the transgressive and upwelling hydrothermal fluids from the open ocean have taken lots of nutritions into the restricted basin. Oxic conditions and rich nutritious water induced the laminated chert-phosphorite sedimentary with low TOC concentrations. When the sea level continues to rise, the sedimentary conditions of bottom water became relative lack oxygen, where were fit for the sedimentary of the carbonaceous shale in the restricted basin.</p><p>2) The Mo isotope compositions of black rock series could not only affected by hydrothermal events, but also the changes of sea level, and marine conditions.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We are very grateful to the reviewers for their reviews and suggestions, which significantly improved the quality of the manuscript. This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41203023).</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Yao, C.Y., Guo, W.M., Liu, J.N. and Li, H.W. (2017) Multiple Proxies on the Paleoenvironment of the Early Cambrian Marine Black Rock Series in the Tarim Basin, NW China: Molybdenum Isotope and Trace Element Evidence. International Journal of Geosciences, 8, 965-983. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2017.88055</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.78588-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Algeo, T.J. and Maynard, J.B. (2004) Trace-Element Behavior and Redox Facies in Core Shales of Upper Pennsylvanian Kansas-Type Cyclothems. Chemical Geology, 206, 289-318. &lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2003.12.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arnold, G.L., Anbar, A.D., Barling, J. and Lyons, T.W. (2004) Molybdenum Isotope Evidence for Widespread Anoxia in Mid-Proterozoic Oceans. Science, 304, 87-90.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1091785</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pearce, C.R., Cohen, A.S., Coe, A.L. and Burton, K.W. (2008) Molybdenum Isotope Evidence for Global Ocean Anoxia Coupled with Perturbations to the Carbon Cycle during the Early Jurassic. Geology, 36, 231-234. https://doi.org/10.1130/G24446A.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kendall, B., Gordon, G.W., Poulton, S.W. and Anbar, A.D. (2011) Molybdenum Isotope Constraints on the Extent of Late Paleoproterozoic Ocean Euxinia. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 307, 450-460.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2011.05.019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xu, L.G., Lehmann, B., Mao, J.W., Nagler, T.F. and Neubert, N. (2012) Mo Isotope and Trace Element Patterns of Lower Cambrian Black Shales in South China: Multi-Proxy Constraints on the Paleoenvironment. Chemical Geology, 318-319, 45-59.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.05.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Herrmann, A.D., Kendall, B., Algeo, T.J. and Gordon, G.W. (2012) Anomalous Molybdenum Isotope Trends in Upper Pennsylvanian Euxinic Facies: Significance for Use of δ98 Mo as a Global Marine Redox Proxy. Chemical Geology, 324-325, 87-98. &lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.05.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wen, H.J., Fan, H.F., Zhang, Y.X., Cloquet, C. and Carignan, J. (2015) Reconstruction of Early Cambrian Ocean Chemistry from Mo Isotopes. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 164, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2015.05.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wignall, P.B. and Myers, K.J. (1988) Interpreting Benthic Oxygen Levels in Mud Rocks: A New Approach. Geology, 16, 452-455.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1988)016&lt;0452:IBOLIM&gt;2.3.CO;2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Tyson, R.V. and Pearson, T.H. (1991) Modern and Ancient Continental Shelf Anoxia: An Overview. In: Tyson, R.V. and Pearson, T.H., Eds., Modern and Ancient Continental Shelf Anoxia, Geological Society Specical Publications, London, 1-24. &lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1991.058.01.01</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Scott, C. and Lyons, T.W. (2012) Contrasting Molybdenum Cycling and Isotopic Properties in Euxinic versus Non-Euxinic Sediments and Sedimentary Rocks: Refining the Paleoproxies. Chemistry Geology, 324-325, 19-27.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.05.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Neubert, N., Nagler, T.F. and Bottcher, M.E. (2008) Sulphidity Controls Molybdenum Isotope Fractionation into Euxinic Sediments: Evidence from the Modern Black Sea. Geology, 36, 775-778. https://doi.org/10.1130/G24959A.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Helz, G.R., Miller, C.V., Charnock, J.M., Mosslemans, J.F.W., Pattrick, R.A.D., Garner, C.D. and Vaughan, D.J. (1996) Mechanism of Molybdenumremoval from the Sea and Its Concentration in Black Shales: EXAFS Evidence. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 60, 3631-3642. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(96)00195-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zheng, Y., Anderson, R.F., Van, G.A. and Kuwabara, J. (2000) Authigenic Molybdenum Formation in Marine Sediments: A Link to Pore Water Sulfide in the Santa Barbara Basin. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 64, 4165-4178.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(00)00495-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anbar, A.D. (2004) Molybdenum Stable Isotopes: Observations, Interpretations and Directions. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 55, 429-454.  
https://doi.org/10.2138/gsrmg.55.1.429</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rimmer, S.M. (2004) Geochemical Paleoredox Indicators in Devonian-Mississip- pian Black Shales, Central Appalachian Basin (USA). Chemistry Geology, 206, 373- 391. &lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2003.12.029</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tribovillard, N., Algeo, T.J. and Lyons, T. (2006) Trace Metals as Paleoredox and Paleoproductivity Proxies: An Update. Chemistry Geology, 232, 12-32.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2006.02.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pattan, J.N. and Pearce, N.J.G. (2009) Bottom Water Oxygenation History in Southeastern Arabian Sea during the Past 140 ka: Results from Redox-Sensitive Elements. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology, 280, 396-405.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2009.06.027</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brasier, M.D. (1992) Background to the Cambrian Explosion. Journal of the Geological Society, 149, 585-587. https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.149.4.0585</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shu, D.G., Morris, S.C., Han, J., Chen, L., Zhang, X.L., Liu, H.Q., Li, Y. and Liu, J.N. (2001) Primitive Deuterostomes from the Chengjiang Lagerstatte (Lower Cambrian, China). Nature, 414, 419-424. https://doi.org/10.1038/35106514</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Banerjee, D.M., Schidlowski, M., Siebert, F. and Brasier, M.D. (1997) Geochemical Changes across the Proterozoic-Cambrian transition in the Durmala Phosphoritemine Section, Mussoorie Hills, Garhwal Himalaya, India. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology, 132, 183-194.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-0182(97)00060-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kimura, H. and Watanabe, Y. (2001) Oceanic Anoxia at the Precambrian-Cam- brian Boundary. Geology, 29, 995-998.  
https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029&lt;0995:OAATPC&gt;2.0.CO;2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Orberger, B., Pasava, J., Paul Gallien. J., Daudin, L. and Trocellier, P. (2003) Se, As, Mo, Ag, Cd, In, Sb, Pt, Au, Tl, Re Traces in Biogenic and Abiogenic Sulfides from Black Shales (Selwyn Basin, Yukon Territories, Canada): A Nuclear Microprobe Study. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B, 210, 441- 448.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yu, B.S., Dong, H.L. and Widom, E. (2009) Geochemistry of Basal Cambrian Black Shales and Cherts from the Northern Tarim Basin, Northwest China: Implications for Depostional Setting and Tectonic History. Journal of Asian Earth Science, 34, 418-436. &lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2008.07.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, D., Ling, H.F., Shields-Zhou, G.A., Chen, X., Cremonese, L., Och, L., Thirlwall, M. and Manning, C.J. (2013) Carbon and Strontium Isotope Evolution of Seawater across the Ediacaran-Cambrian Transition: Evidence from the Xiaotan Section, NE Yunnan, South China. Precambrian Research, 225, 128-147.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2012.01.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mao, J., Lehmann, B., Du, A., Zhang, G., Ma, D., Wang, Y., Zeng, M. and Kerrich, R. (2002) Re-Os Dating of Polymetallic Ni-Mo-PGE-Au Mineralization in Lower Cambrian Black Shales of South China and Its Geologic Significance. Economic Geology, 97, 1051-1061. &lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.97.5.1051</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pi, D.H., Liu, C.Q., Shields-Zhou, A. and Jiang, S.Y. (2013) Trace and Rare Earth Element Geochemistry of Black Shale and Kerogen in the Early Cambrian Niutitang Formation in Guizhou Province, South China: Constraints for Redox Environments and Origin of Metal Enrichments. Precambrian Research, 225, 218-229.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2011.07.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yao, C.Y., Ma, D.S., Ding, H.F., Zhang, X.Y. and Huang, H. (2014) Trace Elements and Stable Isotopic Geochemistry of an Early Cambrian Chert-Phosphorite Unit from the Lower Yurtus Formation of the Sugetbrak Section in the Tarim Basin. Science China Earth Sciences, 57, 454-464.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-013-4760-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhou, C.M. and Jiang, S.Y. (2009) Palaeoceanographic Redox Environments for the Lower Cambrian Hetang Formation in South China: Evidence from Pyrite Framboids, Redox Sensitive Trace Elements, and Sponge Biota Occurrence. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology, 271, 279-286.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2008.10.024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jiang, S.Y., Chen, Y.Q., Ling, H.F., Yang, J.H., Feng, H.Z. and Ni, P. (2006) Trace- and Rare-Earth Element Geochemistry and Pb-Pb Dating of Black Shales and Intercalated Ni-Mo-PGE-Au Sulfide Ores in Lower Cambrian Strata, Yangtze Platform, South China. Mineralium Deposita, 41, 453-467.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00126-006-0066-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jiang, S.Y., Yang, J.H., Ling, H.F., Chen, Y.Q., Feng, H.Z., Zhao, K.D. and Ni, P. (2007) Extreme Enrichment of Polymetallic Ni-Mo-PGE-Au in Lower Cambrian Black Shales of South China: an Os Isotope and PGE Geochemical Investigation. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 254, 217-228.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2007.03.024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Och, L.M., Shields-Zhou, G.A., Poulton, S.W., Manning, C., Thirlwall, M.F., Li, D., Chen, X., Ling, H.F. and Osborn, T. (2013) Redox Changes in Early Cambrian Black Shales at Xiaotan Section, Yunnan Province, South China. Precambrian Research, 225, 166-189. &lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2011.10.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, C. L., Zou, H.B., Santosh, M., Ye, X.T. and Li, H.K. (2014) Is the Precambrian Basement of the Tarim Craton in NW China Composed of Discrete Terranes? Precambrian Research, 254, 226-244.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2014.08.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, W.Y., Xiao, B. and Zhang, S.S. (1985) The Distribution and Correlation of the Cambrian in the Aksu-Wushi Area in Xijian. Xinjiang Geology, 3, 59-73. (In Chinese)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yu, B.S., Wang, L.D. and Chen, J.Q. (2003) The Suboxic Depositional Setting of Black Shales in Lower Cambrian from Northern Tarim Basin. Earth Science Froniter, 10, 545-550. (In Chinese)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yao, J.X., Xiao, S.H. and Yin, L.M. (2005) Basal Cambrian Microfossils from the Yurtus and Xishanblaq Formations (Tarim, North-West China): Systematic Revision and Biostratigraphic Correlation of Micrhystridiumlink Acritatchs from China. Palaeontology, 48, 1-23. &lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4983.2005.00484.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (1982) Regional Geology of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. Geology Publishing House, Beijing, 1-841. (In Chinese)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Qian, Y., Yin, G.Z. and Xiao, B. (2000) Opercula of Hyoliths and Operculum-Like Fossils from the Lower Cambrian Yuertusi Formation, Xinjiang. Acta Micropalaeontol, 17, 404-415. (In Chinese)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, Y.X., Wen, H.J. and Fan, H.F. (2009) Chemical Pretreatment Methods for Measurement of Mo Isotope Ratio on Geological Samples. Chinese Journal Anal Chemistry, 37, 216-220.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wen, H.J., Carignan, J., Cloquet, C., Zhu, X.K. and Zhang, Y.X. (2010) Isotopic Delta Values of Molybdenum Standard Reference and Prepared Solutions Measured by MC-ICP-MS: Proposition for Delta Zero and Secondary References. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 25, 716-721. https://doi.org/10.1039/b921060a</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wen, H.J., Carignan, J., Zhang, Y.X., Fan, H.F., Cloquet, C. and Liu, S.R. (2011) Molybdenum Isotopic Records across the Ediacaran Cambrian Boundary. Geology, 39, 775-778. https://doi.org/10.1130/G32055.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, S.F., Zou, C.N., Dong, D.Z., Wang, Y.M., Li, X.J., Huang, J.L. and Guan, Q.Z. (2015) Multiple Controls on the Paleoenvironment of the Early Cambrian Marin Black Shales in the Sicuhan Basin, SW China: Geochemical and Organic Carbon Isotopic Evidence. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 66, 660-672.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.07.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McLennan, S.M., Taylor, S.R. and McGregor, V.R. (1984) Geochemistry of Archean Metasedimentary Rocks from West Greenland. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 48, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(84)90345-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wignall , P.B. (1994a) Black Shales. Clarendon Press, Oxford.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wignall, P.B. (1994b) Black Shales. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1e46.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Piper, D.Z. (1994) Seawater as the Source of Minor Elements in Black Shales, Phosphorite and Other Sedimentary Rocks. Chemistry Geology, 114, 95-114.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(94)90044-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Taylor, S.R. and Mclennan, S.M. (1985) The Continental Crust: Its Composition and Evolution. Blackwell Scientific Publications, London, 57-72.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hatch, J.R. and Leventhal, J.S. (1992) Relationship between Inferred Redox Potential of the Depositional Environment and Geochemistry of the Upper Pennsylvanian (Missourian) Stark Shale Member of the Dennis Limestone, Wabaunsee County, Kansa, USA. Chemical Geology, 99, 65-82.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(92)90031-Y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Morford, J.L. and Emerson, S. (1999) The Geochemistry of Redox Sensitive Trace Metals in Sediments. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 63, 1735-1750.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(99)00126-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Calvert, S.E. and Pedersen, T.F. (1993) Geochemistry of Recent Oxic and Anoxic Sediments: Implications for the Geological Record. Marine Geology, 113, 67-88.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-3227(93)90150-T</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wignall, P.B., Zonneveld, J.P., Newton, R.J., Amor, K., Sephton, M.A. and Hartley, S. (2007) The End-Triassic Mass Extinction Record of Williston Lake, British Columbia. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 253, 385-406.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2007.06.020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhou, L., Wignall, P.B., Su, J., Feng, Q.L., Xie, S.C., Zhao, L.S. and Huang, J.H. (2012) U/Mo Ratios and δ98/95Mo as Local and Global Redox Proxies during Mass Extinction Events. Chemical Geology, 324-325, 99-107.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.03.020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Langmuir, D. (1978) Uranium Solution-Mineral Equilibria at Low Temperatures with Applications to Sedimentary Ore Deposits. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 42, 547-569. &lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(78)90001-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Algeo, T.J. and Tribovillard, N. (2009) Environmental Analysis of Paleoceanographic Systems Based on Molybdenum-Uranium Covariation. Chemical Geology, 268, 211-225. &lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2009.09.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wignall, P.B. and Twitchett, R.J. (1996) Oceanic Anoxia and the End Permian Mass Extinction. Science, 272, 1155-1158. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.272.5265.1155</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jones, B.J. and Manning, A.C. (1994) Comparison of Geochemical Indices Used for the Interpretation of Palaeo-Redox Conditions in Ancient Mudstones. PALAEO, 111, 111-129.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, Y.F., Fan, T.L., Zhang, J.C., Zhang, J.P., Wei, X.J., Hu, X.L., Zeng, W.T. and Fu, W. (2015) Geochemical Changes in the Early Cambrian Interval of the Yangtze Platform, South China: Implications for Hydrothermal Influences and Paleocean Redox Conditions. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 109, 100-123.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.05.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Trappe, J. (1998) Phanerozoic Phosphorite Depositional System: A Dynamic Model for a Sedimentary Resource System. Springer, Berlin, New York.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0009670</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Follmi, K.B. (1996) The Phosphorus Cycle, Phosphogenesis and Marine Phosphate- Rich Deposits. Earth-Science Reviews, 40, 55-124.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-8252(95)00049-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Siebert, C., McManus, J., Bice, A., Poulson, R. and Berelson, W.M. (2006) Molybdenum Isotope Signatures in Continental Margin Marine Sediments. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 241, 723-733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2005.11.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Poulson, R.L., McManus, J., Severmann, S. and Berelson, W.M. (2009) Molybdenum Behavior during Early Diagenesis: Insights from Mo Isotopes. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 10.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Siebert, C., Nagler, T.F., Blanckenburg, F. and Kramers, J.D. (2003) Molybdenum Isotope Records as a Potential New Proxy for Paleoceanography. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 211, 159-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(03)00189-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McManus, J., Nagler, T., Siebert, C., Wheat, C.G. and Hammond, D.E. (2002) Oceanic Molybdenum Isotope Fractionation: Diagenesis and Hydrothermal Ridge- Flank Alteration. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 1078.  
https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GC000356</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Greber, N.D., Siebert, C., Ngler, T.F. and Petke, T. (2012) 98/95Mo Values and Molybde-Numconcentration Data for NIST SRM 610, 612 and 3134: Towards a Common Protocol for Reporting Mo Data. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research, 36, 291-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-908X.2012.00160.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ryb, U., Erel, Y., Matthews, A., Avni, Y., Gordon, G.W. and Anbar, A.D. (2009) Large Molybdenum Isotope Variations Trace Subsurface Fluid Migration along the Dead Sea Transform. Geology, 37, 463-466. https://doi.org/10.1130/G25331A.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Barling, J., Arnold, G.L. and Anbar, A.D. (2001) Natural Mass-Dependent Variations in the Isotopic Composition of Molybdenum. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 193, 447-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00514-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jia, R. (1997) Structure and Oil and Gas Resources in Tarim Basin China. Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing, 438. (In Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kirschvink, J.L., Ripperdan, R.L. and Evans, D.A. (1997) Evidence for a Large-Scale Reorganization of Early Cambrian Continental Masses by Inertial Interchange True polar Wander. Science, 277, 541-545. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5325.541</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gao, Z.Q. and Fan, T.L. (2012) Extensional Tectonics and Sedimentary Response of the Early-Middle Cambrian Passive Continental Margin, Tarim Basin, Northwest China. Geoscience Frontiers, 3, 661-668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2012.01.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Archer, C. and Vance, D. (2008) The Isotopic Signature of the Global Riverine Molybdenum Flux and Anoxia in the Ancient Oceans. Nature Geoscience, 1, 597-600.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo282</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Amthor, J.E., Grotzinger, J.P., Schroder, S., Bowring, S.A., Ramezani, J., Martin, M. W. and Matter, A. (2003) Extinction of Cloudina and Namacalathus at the Precambrian-Cambrian Boundary in Oman. Geology, 31, 431-434.  
&lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(2003)031&lt;0431:EOCANA&gt;2.0.CO;2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shields, G. and Stille, P. (2001) Diagenetic Constraints on the Use of Cerium Anomalies as Palaeoseawater Redox Proxies: An Isotopic and REE Study of Cambrian Phosphorites. Chemical Geology, 175, 29-48.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2541(00)00362-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78588-ref72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lehmann, B., Nagler, T.F., Holland, H.D., Wille, M., Mao, J.W., Pan, J.Y., Ma, D.S. and Dulski, P. (2007) Highly Metalliferous Carbonaceous Shale and Early Cambrian Seawater. Geology, 35, 403-406. https://doi.org/10.1130/G23543A.1</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>