Adventitious budding from embryonic cotyledons of immature seeds of carob was obtained. The combination of BAP (4.44 μM) and NAA (1.5 μM) furthered the neoformation of adventitious buds. These latter were multiplied on MS medium added with BAP (2.22 μM). Stems and leaves growing were improved by adding 2.02 μM GA
3
. Elongation was favored by 0.5 μM NAA. 70% of rooting was obtained with 10 μM IBA.
<i>Ceratonia siliqua</i> L. Micropropagation Adventitious Bud Embryonic Cotyledons1. Introduction
Carob tree (Ceratonia siliqua L., Fabaceae) is an agro-sylvo-pastoral species with socio-economic and ecological interests. It is very adapted to the various Mediterranean climates and different soil types [1] [2] [3] .
Carob propagation is carried out in two main ways, by shoot and meristem culture for large-scale clonal propagation and by the development of cell and tissue culture techniques for the induction of calli in vitro.
Traditionally, the propagation of carob trees has been achieved by grafting young trees with selected female buds of productive trees [4] . This traditional propagation method has failed to respond to market demand. The carob tree can also be propagated by seedlings, but the seeds do not show correct germination rates unless after scarification; Moreover, this multiplication does not guarantee the sex and the genetic characteristics of the cultivars. Cuttings multiplication is problematic because rooting is difficult [5] . In this context, micropropagation techniques offer an alternative to the propagation of carob trees in order to satisfy the increased demand for this tree [6] .
Among the various techniques developed for the in vitro propagation of Ceratonia siliqua, we distinguish micropropagation by axillary budding from nodal explants of young stems, and by apex culture [6] [7] [8] or by adventive budding (direct organogenesis on leaf fragments, cotyledons or stems used as explants and indirect when buds appear without or after callus formation) [9] , and somatic embryogenesis from immature cotyledons [10] , mature cotyledons [11] , zygotic embryos [12] or immature seeds [13] .
In the present study, embryonic cotyledons culture was established to evaluate organogenic capacity of these explants. Thereby, we tested the effect of different auxins combined with BAP on the development of embryonic cotyledons. Seedlings were regenerated from broken buds; also, several combinations of BAP with NAA were evaluated to improve their organogenicity. Shoot multiplication was studied on MS and WPM mediums added with different growth regulators (auxins, 6-Benzylaminopurine; BAP, and Gibberellic acid; GA3) often combined to each other.
2. Material and Methods2.1. Explants Preparation
Immature carob fruits were harvested during June 2016, from a female tree on Tetouan-Chefchaouen road, Amtil region, Western Rif, Morocco (Figure 1).
After abundant washing with running water, seeds were placed for 20 minutes in a calcium hypochlorite (Ca(OCl)2) solution (7%) and then subjected to three
(a) Female tree with immature seed; (b) Immature pod and seeds harvested in June.
successive 10 minutes washes with sterilized distilled water. Then, the seeds were removed aseptically under a hood, immersed 3 minutes in mercuric chloride (HgCl2) solution 0.1% and afterward washed three times for 10 minutes with sterile distilled water. These seeds were shelled and separated from their albu- men. The lower third of the embryonic cotyledons, with gemmule, plumule and radicle were removed and the upper part was implanted, either horizontally and vertically, in 200 ml flasks containing 50 ml of culture medium, solidified by 0.7% agar. In addition, the basic nutrient medium consists of Woody Plant Me- dium (WPM) macronutrients [14] , supplemented with Murashige and Skoog (MS) [15] micronutrients and vitamins, as well as 3% sucrose and 0.1 g/l myo- inositol, the pH was adjusted at 5.8. Moreover, cultures were placed in a culture room with 16 hours photoperiod (4000 lux) at 23˚C - 25˚C during the day and 20˚C at night. Results were evaluated after one month growth.
2.2. Characteristics of Immature Seeds
A sample of thirty seeds was selected for which the means of length, width and thickness were determined. The weights of fresh (FM) and dry (DM) matter of the seeds were also estimated after drying in an oven at 70˚C for 15 days (Table 1).
2.3. Initiation of Embryonic Cotyledons Culture2.3.1. Growth Regulators Effect
1) Effect of Auxins Associated with BAP
Embryonic cotyledons were cultured vertically on MS medium supplemented with four auxins (Indole-3-acetic acid; IAA, Indole-3-butyric acid; IBA, 2-naph- thalineacetic acid; NAA and 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid; 2,4-D) in three concentrations (0.5; 1.5 and 2.5 µM) combined with BAP at 4.44 µM. Results were evaluated after one month.
2) Effect of different concentrations of BAP combined with NAA
1.5 µM NAA combined with BAP was the best concentration for the development of adventitious buds from embryonic cotyledons. Then we tested other concentrations of BAP (0.44; 1.33; 2.22; 3.55; 4.44 and 6.66 µM).
2.3.2. Effect of the Position of Embryonic Cotyledons
To test the effect of the position, we tried on to put cotyledons vertically and horizontally in MS medium supplemented with three concentrations of BAP (1.33; 2.22 and 4.4 µM) combined with 1.5 µM NAA. Results were reported after one month.
Mean dimensions and weights of thirty immature carob seeds harvested in June 2016
Length (mm)
Width (mm)
Thickness (mm)
FM (g)
DM (g)
10.40 ± 0.4
7.2 ± 0.4
3.95 ± 0.6
0.16 ± 0.03
0.05 ± 0.01
2.4. Multiplication of Shoots Obtained from Adventitious Buds
Shoots obtained after the break of adventitious buds from embryonic cotyledons, that presented three internodes of 5 - 7 mm, were transplanted into different mediums. Results were evaluated after one month growth.
2.4.1. Effect of Macronutrients MS and WPM
The effect of MS and WPM macronutrients, supplemented with BAP (2.22; 4.44 and 6.66 µM) was tested on the multiplication of shoots obtained after the break of adventitious buds on the embryonic cotyledons.
2.4.2. Effect of Growth Regulators
MS medium, more favorable than WPM for shoot multiplication and survival, was adopted to study the effect of other growth regulators.
Thereby, to study the effect of gibberellins on the multiplication and elongation of shoots obtained from embryonic cotyledons, different concentrations of GA3 (0.29; 0.58; 0.87; 1.44; 2.02 and 2.89 µM) were combined with 2.22 µM BAP.
Furthermore, different auxins (IAA, IBA, NAA and 2,4-D) at 0.5 µM, combined with 2.22 µM BAP, were tested.
2.5. Shoot Elongation
Shoot elongation after multiplication was studied in the presence of three con- centrations of BAP (1.33; 2.22 and 4.44 µM) and in the presence of GA3 (0.58; 1.44 and 2.02 µM) associated to BAP at 1.33 µM.
2.6. Plantlets Rooting
IBA and IAA were adopted to induce shoot rooting after multiplication and elongation. These shoots were first cultured under darkness at ½ MS medium supplemented with IBA or IAA at 5 or 10 µM during one week, then transferred to light in the same medium, but without growth regulators. Results were eva- luated after one month.
2.7. Statistical Analysis
For each study, three replicates of thirty explants were carried out. All results were analyzed with a completely randomized design and tested using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) and means were compared using Duncan’s multiple range test at p < 0.05.
The reaction of embryonic cotyledons varies according to the conditions and the studied parameter. The percentage of only callogenic explants reaches 97% in the presence of 2,4-D at 2.5 µM, followed by NAA at 2.5 µM with a percentage of 92%; moreover, the percentage of callogenic and caulogenic explants is generally low (Table 2, Figure 2). This latter reaches 27.86% in the presence of 1.5 µM NAA, the number of buds per explants is 4.8. The concentration of 1.5 µM seems to be the most appropriate for the neoformation of adventitious buds regardless of the studied auxin, a higher concentration favors callogenesis at the expense of caulogenesis.
2) Effect of different concentrations of BAP combined with NAA
The combination of BAP at different concentrations with NAA (1.5 µM) does not improve the percentage of caulogenic explants. Indeed, the best results are obtained, like before, with 4.44 µM BAP. 3.55 µM does not present significant difference with 4.44 µM BAP (Table 3, Figure 3). In some cases with low concentrations of BAP, roots are formed on the embryonic cotyledons.
Adventitious buds obtained from embryonic cotyledons cultured in WPM medium added with NAA (1.5 µM) combined with BAP (4.44 µM), after one month growth
Effect of four auxins combined with BAP (4.44 µM) on the morphogenesis of carob embryonic cotyledons after one monthculture
Auxins
Concentrations (µM)
% callogenic explants
% callogenic and caulogenic explants
Number of buds by caulogenic explant
% of explants without reaction
IAA
0.5
74.20 g
6.45 c
1 c
19.35 a
1.5
86.30 cd
6.80 c
1 c
6.90 e
2.5
92.05 b
0 e
0 d
7.95 de
IBA
0.5
80.77 ef
0 e
0 d
19.23 a
1.5
77.42 fg
6.45 c
1 c
16.13 b
2.5
89.50 bc
0 e
0 d
10.50 c
NAA
0.5
82.35 e
8.55 b
2.50 ± 0.17 b
9.10 cd
1.5
78.57 f
27.86 a
4.80 ± 0.39 a
3.57 gh
2.5
92.12 b
2.70 d
1 c
5.18 fg
2,4-D
0.5
83.33 de
0 e
0 d
16.67 b
1.5
86.28 cd
6.82 c
1 c
6.90 ef
2.5
97.48 a
0 e
0 d
2.52 h
Means in the same column followed by the same letters are not significantly different from each other according to the Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Effect of different concentrations of BAP combined with NAA. (a) Adventitious buds obtained from embryonic cotyledons cultured in WPM medium, added with NAA (1.5 µM) and BAP (1.33 µM) after one month growth; (b) Adventitious buds obtained from embryonic cotyledons cultured in WPM medium added with 1.5 µM NAA combined with BAP (4.44 µM), after one month growth; (c) Rooting of embryonic cotyledons cultured in WPM medium added with NAA (1.5 µM) and BAP (0.44 µM) after one month growth.
Effect of BAP combined with NAA (1.5 µM) on the morphogenesis of carob em- bryonic cotyledons, after one month culture
BAP (µM)
% of callogenic explants
% of callogenic and caulogenic explants
Number of buds by caulogenic explants
% of explants without reaction
0.44
86.67 a
0 e
0 e
13.33 b
1.33
76.22 c
7.92 c
1.87 ± 0.17 d
15.86 a
2.22
79.86 bc
10.04 c
2.50 ± 0.21 c
10.10 c
3.55
80.95 bc
14.28 b
4.32 ± 0.35 a
4.76 d
4.44
61.11 c
28.78 a
4.50 ± 0.43 a
11.11 c
6.66
85.31 ab
14.59 b
3.02 ± 0.28 bc
0 e
Means in the same column followed by the same letters are not significantly different from each other according to the Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
3.1.2. Effect of Embryonic Cotyledons Position
The position of embryonic cotyledons does not have a remarkable effect on their development (Table 4). Generally, the values obtained are close, with a slight preference for the vertical position, especially for the number of buds by explant, significantly higher at 4.44 µM.
3.2. Multiplication of Shoots Obtained from Adventitious Buds3.2.1. Effect of Macronutrients MS and WPM
The size of shoots varies according to the macronutrients used and the concen- tration of BAP (Table 5, Figure 4). In WPM medium, the elongation of shoots is maximal at 4.44 and 6.66 µM (1.5 mm), and a similar value without significant difference is obtained at 2.22 µM with MS medium.
The neoformation of shoots and leaves seems to be more favorable on MS medium, especially with BAP 2.22 µM. Similar values are obtained on WPM
Effect of macronutrients MS and WPM. (a) Shoots of one month, obtained from adventitious buds deriving from embryonic cotyledons, on MS medium added with BAP (2.22 µM); (b) Shoots of one month, obtained from adventitious buds deriving from embryonic cotyledons, on WPM medium added with BAP (2.22 µM).
Effect of two positions (vertical V and horizontal H) on the growth and develop- ment of embryonic cotyledons, cultured in WPM medium in presence of NAA (1.5 µM) and BAP
BAP (µM)
Position
% of callogenic explants
% of callogenic and caulogenic explants
Number of buds by caulogenic explant
% of explants without reaction
1.33
V
73.58 b
8.80 bc
2.31 ± 0.21 cd
17.62 a
H
73.35 b
7.78 c
1.65 ± 0.15 de
18.72 a
2.22
V
72.56 b
13.81 b
3.66 ± 0.35 b
13.64 b
H
80.34 a
9.64 bc
2.70 ± 0.28 c
10.02 c
4.44
V
58.10 c
30.79 a
5.10 ± 0.43 a
11.10 c
H
60.60 c
29.21 a
1.17 ± 0.10 e
10.20 c
Means in the same column followed by the same letters are not significantly different from each other according to the Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Effect of two basic medium (MS and WPM) on carob shoot multiplication from adventitious buds after 30 day growth
BAP (µM)
Shoots size (mm)
Shoots number
Number of leaves by shoot
% of poorly developed shoots (<5 mm)
WPM
2.22
12.2 ± 1.1 c
3.25 ± 0.31 c
2.46 ± 0.24 c
0
4.44
14.5 ± 1.2 ab
3.34 ± 0.34 c
3.83 ± 0.32 a
0
6.66
15.1 ± 1.3 a
4.00 ± 0.38 ab
3.90 ± 0.35 a
0
MS
2.22
15.7 ± 1.3 a
4.80 ± 0.45 a
3.30 ± 0.34 b
0
4.44
13.5 ± 1.1 bc
4.52 ± 0.44 a
3.01 ± 0.31 b
0
6.66
12.1 ± 1.1 c
3.39 ± 0.40 ab
3.75 ± 0.32 a
0
Means in the same column followed by the same letters are not significantly different from each other according to the Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
medium at a high concentration of BAP, however, some physiological disorders were observed, such as the formation of lenticels or the vitrification of explants.
3.2.2. Effect of Growth Regulators
1) Effect of GA3
The combination of GA3 with BAP does not influence strongly shoot growth. Values registered are generally lower than those obtained with BAP alone. Nevertheless, neoformation of shoots and leaves is improved and the best results (6.13 and 3.94, respectively) are obtained with 2.02 µM of GA3 (Table 6, Figure 5).
2) Effect of auxins
The combination of auxins (IAA, IBA and NAA) does not improve signifi- cantly shoot elongation. Furthermore, the neoformation of shoots seems to be globally inhibited by the addition of auxins, especially in the case of NAA and 2,4-D, while leaf neoformation increases slightly (Table 7).
Shoots of one month obtained from adventitious buds deriving from embryonic cotyledons, on MS medium added with GA<sub>3</sub> (2.02 µM) and BAP (2.22 µM)
Effect of GA<sub>3</sub> combined with BAP (2.22 µM) on carob shoot proliferation from adventitious buds after 30 day growth on MS medium
GA3 (µM)
Shoots size (mm)
Shoots number
Number of leaves by shoot
% of shoots poorly developed
0
15.1 ± 1.4 a
4.80 ± 0.50 b
3.29 ± 0.30 c
0
0.29
11.7 ± 1.1 c
4.68 ± 0.47 b
4.16 ± 0.38 a
0
0.58
12.1 ± 1.1 bc
4.84 ± 0.45 b
3.65 ± 0.33 b
0
1.44
13.2 ± 1.2 bc
4.99 ± 0.52 b
3.53 ± 0.34 b
0
2.02
14.5 ± 1.3 ab
6.13 ± 0.58 a
3.94 ± 0.35 a
0
2.89
13.0 ± 1.2 bc
5.08 ± 0.46 b
3.62 ± 0.34 b
0
Means in the same column followed by the same letters are not significantly different from each other according to the Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Effect of four auxins at 0.5 µM combined with BAP (2.22 µM) on carob shoot multiplication from adventitious buds after 30 day growth on MS medium
Auxin
Shoots size (mm)
Shoots number
Number of leaves by shoot
% of shoots poorly developed
0
15.2 ± 1.3 ab
4.76 ± 0.47 a
3.36 ± 0.29 b
0
IAA
15.3 ± 1.5 ab
3.67 ± 0.29 bc
3.70 ± 0.35 a
0
IBA
15.4 ± 1.4 ab
4.21 ± 0.38 ab
2.91 ± 0.28 c
0
NAA
16.3 ± 1.5 a
3.00 ± 0.26 c
3.71 ± 0.36 a
0
2,4-D
13.3 ± 1.2 b
1.35 ± 0.32 d
3.65 ± 0.55 a
0
Means in the same column followed by the same letters are not significantly different from each other according to the Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
3.3. Shoot Elongation
Shoot elongation is mostly promoted by BAP at 1.33 µM, but increasing the concentration has a negative effect on their growth. Besides, the addition of GA3 does not improve shoot size. Moreover, an acceleration of growth is observed between the second and the third week, what is translated by a steep slope, which tends to dampen after this period (Figure 6 and Figure 7).
3.4. Shoot Rooting and Acclimatization of Plantlets3.4.1. Shoot Rooting
Induction of rooting in the presence of IAA and IBA shows that this latter is the most favorable, especially in 10 µM, with a maximum percentage of 70%. However, the maximum size of roots is obtained at 5 µM of IBA (Table 8, Figure 8).
3.4.2. Acclimatization of Plantlets
The acclimatization of the resulted plantlets in the peat is difficult; they often wither during the first week. The success rate did not exceed 40% (Figure 9).
4. Discussion
The culture of embryonic cotyledons of carob tree, established only recently [9] , offers a new way of micropropagation. Shoots obtained after multiplication phase are very similar to those obtained by apex culture or by cotyledonary buds culture.
After culturing, embryonic cotyledons, with reduced size (about 7 mm), un- dergo a considerable increase (about 20 mm). Generally, a callus develops in the contact of explants with culture medium. The development of adventitious buds is made anarchically within the culture medium. In rare cases, a neoformation of roots is noticed. The percentage of callogenic explants is often high (74.2% - 97.48%), while that of callogenic and caulogenic explants is globally low (0% - 27.86%).
Among the studied auxins, in different concentrations and combined with
Effect of the concentration of BAP on the elongation of shoots obtained from adventitious buds
Effect of GA<sub>3</sub> combined with BAP (1.33 µM) on the elongation of shoots obtained from adventitious buds
Effect of IAA and IBA on carob shoot rooting after one week under dark on ½ MS medium, added with auxins (IAA and IBA at 5 and 10 µM) and their transfer to ½ MS without auxins, under light
Auxins (µM)
Shoots size (mm)
Number of stems by shoot
Number of leaves by shoot
% of rooting
Number of roots by plantlet
Length of roots (mm)
IAA
5
10.8 ± 1.1 b
1.00 ± 0.0 b
4.58 ± 0.36 b
32.45 c
1.97 ± 0.20 b
28.34 ± 2.33 c
10
10.4 ± 0.9 b
1.00 ± 0.0 b
3.20 ± 0.29 c
25.80 d
1.50 ± 0.45 b
25.62 ± 2.54 c
IBA
5
12.8 ± 1.1 a
1.00 ± 0.0 b
4.35 ± 0.37 b
56.20 b
3.22 ± 0.27 a
43.54 ± 3.87 a
10
13.9 ± 1.2 a
2.45 ± 0.2 a
6.50 ± 0.54 a
70.37 a
4.33 ± 0.36 a
35.85 ± 2.65 b
Means in the same column followed by the same letters are not significantly different from each other according to the Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Rooting phase. (a) Rooted plantlet obtained one month after rooting induction in darkness, on ½ MS added with 10 µM IBA; (b) Rooted plantlet obtained one month after rooting induction in darkness, on ½ MS added with 5 µM IBA.
Plantlet obtained after three month acclimatization in peat substrate
BAP (4.44 µM), the neoformation of adventitious buds is mostly favored by NAA at 1.5 µM, contrary to 2,4-D, that favors callogenesis (reaching 97.48% at 2.5 µM). Indeed, among various types of auxins, 2,4-D is employed in callusing induction [16] [17] . Custódio et al. (2004) [18] obtained the best result in terms of calli induction from anthers, with the higher tested concentration (2.26 µM). Also, Carimi et al. (1997) [19] demonstrated that concentrations ranging from 0.45 to 4.52 µM promote a good development of callus on cultured ova. Therefore, 2,4-D could induce callogenesis, while NAA could be used to induce both callogenesis and caulogenesis. We also want to point out that the effectiveness of BAP in cotyledonary nodes culture was well indicated and produced better results in multiplication of shoots. However, shoot tips, hypocotyls, cotyledonary leaves and roots produced only callus which were non-regenerative [9] .
The combination of NAA (1.5 µM) with other concentrations of BAP does not improve the percentage of caulogenic explants. The obtained results are less important than those found with 4.44 µM; beyond this concentration, BAP seems to have an inhibitory effect on the neoformation of adventitious buds. The inhibitory effect of high concentration of BAP was observed in other studies: Belaizi et al. (1995) [20] noticed that during the study of carob regeneration from lateral buds, concentrations higher than 4.44 µM does not increase the number of broken buds. As well, Romano et al. (2002) [6] affirm that the best multiple shoot response was obtained in MS medium supplemented with 4.44 µM BAP, for in vitro propagation protocol based on axillary bud proliferation.
Also, survival of meristems reaches the maximum with 8.88 µM BAP and de- creases in a higher concentration [21] . However, Radi et al. (2013) [22] found that MS medium added with 8.88 µM BAP affects significantly the size of shoots obtained from lateral buds and gives the best results among lower concentra- tions.
The position of embryonic cotyledons on culture medium does not have a considerable effect on their development. The area in contact with the medium reacts by initiating small clusters of callus that will end by forming a big calli ac- companied or not by adventitious buds.
Concerning the multiplication and elongation of shoots deriving from adventitious buds, WPM and MS mediums give close results, even if the hormonal balance used is different. The maximum of shoots and leaves is obtained in WPM added with 6.66 µM BAP (4 and 3.9, respectively), while close values are obtained in MS medium added with 2.22 µM BAP (4.8 and 3.3, respectively). Gharnit and Ennabili (2009) [23] showed that WPM, in comparison with MS and Gresshoff and Doy (GD) [24] , added with 0.44 µM BAP is the most favora- ble for the development of explants from shoot tip cultures, with 100% produc- tion of buds, a low rate of apical necrosis and callogenesis.
The addition of GA3 at 2.02 µM to BAP (2.22 µM) increases slightly the num- ber of shoots and leaves. Thus, GA3 could be added to BAP during shoot multip- lication. In fact, Sebastian and McComb (1986) [25] affirmed that addition of GA3 (2.5 µM) in the shoot multiplication medium inhibited subsequent rooting. This inhibition was partially overcome by a passage in a medium added with zeatin (5 µM) and without GA3. As well, multiple shoots, developed using axil- lary buds, were regenerated when explants were cultured in MS medium, sup- plemented with 6.66 µM BAP and 1.44 µM GA3 [26] . Furthermore, bud break via lateral budding, was ensured with BAP and improved with 2.22 µM BAP combined with 1.44 µM GA3 [27] . Belaizi et al. (1995) [20] also obtained good results when combining BAP and GA3, but high concentrations of BAP causes some physiological disorders, like shoot vitrification, apical necrosis, appearance of lenticels and reduction in leaf size.
The combination of auxins with BAP does not improve shoot multiplication. However, auxins like IAA and IBA, in low concentration (0.57 and 0.49 µM, re- spectively), have been already used, combined with several concentrations of BAP, and sometimes with GA3, with good results when culturing microshoots from a tree [28] and using micropropagation by shoot tip cultures [29] . Other studies proved also that high concentrations of auxins combined with BAP and GA3 give good results in the culture of young buds [26] , as well as for apical buds break from a mature tree [21] . Radi et al. (2013) [22] observed that the best ef- fect of the combination of auxins and BAP was obtained with 2.22 BAP and 2.46 µM IBA, 2.68 NAA, and 2.58 IAA, but the combination of 2.22 µM BAP, 2.46 µM IBA and 1.44 µM GA3 induced shoot multiplication and also provided rooting of shoots.
Actually, an elongation phase of shoots was added to favor the rooting phase, as in vitro propagation of some other tree species [30] [31] . According to Belaizi et al. (1989) [32] , this step is optional and is only required for very small shoots in order to obtain elongated leafy stems of Pyros malus which are then used for rooting. Moreover, after the multiplication phase, small shoots can be directly placed on a rooting medium, but it was proved that the success of this phase de- pended on the size of the explant. Thus, very short stems (2 to 3 mm), placed on a rooting medium containing IBA, showed necrosis very frequently, also, the growth of those who developed roots was blocked subsequently [33] . The same observations were also made by Boxus and Quoirin (1974) [34] , IBA applied too early to buds can irreversibly inhibit their elongation. However, after the multip- lication phase, the length of new shoots is very variable. In some clones, some buds eventually lengthen after several subcultures and can then be rooted. How- ever, this elongation seems to occur randomly and in most cases, the young shoots do not exceed 5 mm in length. It is therefore necessary to find a medium allowing the elongation of shoots obtained during the propagation phase, so that they can react to the rhizogenic treatments and then have a normal development [33] .
Initiation of shoot rooting after multiplication phase is mostly favored by IBA (10 µM) in half strength MS medium, which is in agreement with several other studies [6] [35] . Actually, in many woody plants, IBA is commonly used to pro- mote root initiation [36] [37] .
Nevertheless, several authors have shown that auxins are only required during the initiation phase, and become inhibitory for root growth [38] [39] [40] . Also, the effect of mother tree age on rooting of carob shoots was demonstrated: rooting capacity of micro-shoots originated from juvenile parts of mature trees is the best [41] . In some other references, it was reported that carob shoots obtained from shoot tips cultures can root without auxins [23] [29] [42] . Shahzad et al. (2017) [9] reported that IBA promoted rhizogenic response in shoots.
5. Conclusion
The results of the present study demonstrate that carob can be cultured in vitro, starting from embryonic cotyledons and going through adventitious buds that develop stems, leaves and roots, to be finally acclimatized with a survival rate of 40%.
Cite this paper
El Bouzdoudi, B., Saïdi, R., El Ansari, Z.N., El Kbiach, M.L., Martin, P., Badoc, A. and Lamarti, A. (2017) Micropropagation of Carob (Ceratonia sili- qua L.) through Adventitious Buds of Immature Embryonic Cotyledons. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 8, 2180-2195. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2017.89146
ReferencesGullo, M.A. and Salleo, S. (1988) Different Strategies of Drought Resistance in Three Mediterranean Sclerophyllous Trees Growing in the Same Environmental Conditions. New Phytologist, 108, 267-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1988.tb04162.xCorreia, P.M. and Martins-Loução, M.A. (1994) Preliminary Studies on Mycorrrhizae of Ceratonia siliqua L., Mycorrhizas in Integrated Systems from Genes to Plant Development. New York Botanical Gardens Bronx, NY, 86-88.Russo, G. and Polignano, G.B. (1996) Variation of Seed and Fruit Characters in Ceratonia siliqua L. Cultivars. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 43, 525-531. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138829Batlle, I. and Tous, J. (1997) Carob Tree. Ceratonia siliqua L. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, 92 p.Lee, C.L., Paul, J.L. and Hackett, W.P. (1977) Promoting of Rooting in Stem Cuttings of Several Ornamental Plants by Pretreatment with Acid or Base. HortScience, 12, 41-42.Romano, A., Barros, S. and Martins-Loução, M.A. (2002) Micropropagation of the Mediterranean Tree Ceratonia siliqua L. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 68, 35-41. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012912504288Custódio, L., Martins-Loução, M.A. and Romano, A. (2004) Influence of Sugars on in vitro Rooting and Acclimatization of Carob Tree. Biologia Plantarum, 48, 469-472. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BIOP.0000041107.23191.8cGonçalves, S., Correia, P.J., Martins-Loução, M.A. and Romano, A. (2005) A New Medium Formulation for in vitro Rooting of Carob Tree based on Leaf Macronutients Concentrations. Biologia Plantarum, 49, 277-280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-005-7280-4Shahzad, A., Akhtar, R., Bukhari, N.A. and Perveen, K. (2017) High Incidence Regeneration System in Ceratonia siliqua L. Articulated with SEM and Biochemical Analysis during Developmental Stages. Trees, 31, 1149-1163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-017-1534-6Canhoto, J.M., Rama, S.C. and Cruz, G.S. (2006) Somatic Embryogenesis and Plant Regeneration in Carob (Ceratonia siliqua L.). In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant, 42, 514-519. https://doi.org/10.1079/IVP2006819Lozzi, A., Abousalim, A. and Abdelwahd, R. (2015) Effet du 2,4-D sur l’Induction de l’Embryogenèse Somatique à partir de Cotylédons Matures de Caroubier (Ceratonia siliqua L.). Revue Marocaine des sciences Agronomiques et Vétérinaires, 3, 24-29.Custódio, L. and Romano, A. (2006) In vitro Morphogenesis in Zygotic Embryo Cultures of Carob Tree (Ceratonia siliqua L.). Acta Horticulturae, 725, 477-481. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2006.725.68Ksia, E., Harzallah-Skhiri, F., Verdeil, J.L., Gouta, H., Alemanno, L. and Bouzid, S. (2008) Somatic Embryo Production from Immature Seeds of Carob (Ceratonia siliqua L.): Histological Evidence. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 83, 401-406. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2008.11512398McCown, B.H. and Lloyd, G. (1981) Woody Plant Medium (WPM)—A Mineral Nutrient Formulation for Microculture of Woody Plant Species. HortScience, 16, 453-453.Murashige, T. and Skoog, F. (1962) A Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bioassays with Tobacco Tissue Culture. Physiologia Plantarum, 15, 473-497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.xRadojevic, I., Marinkovic, N. and Jevremovic, S. (2000) Influence of the Sex of Flowers on Androgenesis in Aesculus hippocastanum L. Anther Culture. In vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant, 36, 464-469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-000-0083-6Chaturvedi, R., Razdan, M.K. and Bhojwani, S.S. (2003) Production of Haploids of Neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.) by Anther Culture. Plant Cell Reports, 21, 531-537.Custódio, L., Carneiro, M.F. and Romano, A. (2004) Microsporogenesis and Anther Culture in Carob Tree (Ceratonia siliqua L.). Scientia Horticulturae, 104, 65-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2004.08.001Carimi, F., Di Lorenzo, R. and Crescimanno, F.G. (1997) Callus Induction and Somatic Embryogenesis in Carob (Ceratonia siliqua L.) from Ovule Culture. Scientia Horticulturae, 70, 73-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(97)00034-4Belaizi, M., Bolen, M.R. and Boxus, P. (1995) Régénération in vitro et Acclimatation du Caroubier (Ceratonia siliqua L.). In: Dubois, J., Ed., Quel Avenir pour l’Amélioration des Plantes? John Libbey Eurotext, Paris, 227-232.Naghmouchi, S., Khoudja, M.L., Agusti Romero, A. and Boussaid, M. (2012) Micropropagation of Carob, Ceratonia siliqua L., by Apex Culture. Acta Botanica Gallica, 159, 357-361. https://doi.org/10.1080/12538078.2012.737124Radi, A., Echchgadda, G., Ibijbijen, J. and Rochd, M. (2013) In vitro Propagation of Moroccan Carob (Ceratonia siliqua L.). Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 11, 1103-1107.Gharnit, N. and Ennabili, A. (2009) Essais Préliminaires de Culture in vitro du Caroubier (Ceratonia siliqua L.) Originaire du Nord Ouest du Maroc. Biomatec Echo, 3, 18-25.Gresshoff, P.M. and Doy, C.H. (1972) Development and Differentiation of Haploid Lycopersicum esculentum (Tomato). Planta, 107, 161-170. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00387721Sebastian, K.T. and McComb, J.A. (1986) A Micropropagation System for Carob (Ceratonia siliqua L.). Scientia Horticulturae, 28, 127-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(86)90132-9Hakim, L., Islam, M.R., Mamun, A.N.K., Ahmed, G. and Khan, R. (2010) Clonal Propagation of Carob (Ceratonia siliqua L., Fabaceae). Bangladesh Journal of Botany, 39, 15-19. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjb.v39i1.5520Saidi, R., Lamarti, A. and Badoc, A. (2007) Micropropagation du Caroubier (Ceratonia siliqua) par Culture de Bourgeons Axillaires issus de Jeunes Plantules. Bulletin de la Société de Pharmacie de Bordeaux, 146, 113-129.Thomas, V. and Mehta, A.R. (1983) Effect of Phloroglucinol on Shoot Growth and Initiation of Roots in Carob Tree Cultures Grown in Vitro. In Sen, S.K. and Giles, K.L., Eds., Plant Cell Culture in Crop Improvement. Plenum Press, New York, 451-457. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4379-0_49Saidi, R., El Bouzdoudi, B., Kbiach, M.B., Lamarti, A. and Maouni, A. (2015) Effets des Macroéléments et des Auxines sur la Micropropagation du Caroubier (Ceratonia siliqua L., Leguminosae) par Culture d’Apex. Journal of Materials and Environmental Sciences, 6, 2330-2337.Victório, C.P., Salgueiro Lage, C.L. and Sato, A. (2012) Tissue Culture Techniques in the Proliferation of Shoots and Roots of Calendula officinalis. Revista Ciência Agronômica, 43, 539-545. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-66902012000300017Sadeghi, F., Yadollahi, A., Jafarkhani Kermani, M. and Eftekhari, M. (2015) Optimizing Culture Media for in vitro Proliferation and Rooting of Tetra (Prunus empyrean 3) Rootstock. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, 13, 19-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgeb.2014.12.006Belaizi, M., Sangwan, R.S., David, A. and Sangwan-Norreel, B.S. (1989) Maitrise des étapes de la micropropagation du Pommier (Pyrus malus) L. cv. Golden Delicious, Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France. Lettres Botaniques, 136, 187-197.Riffaud, J.L., Cornu, D. and Capelli, P. (1981) Utilisation de la Culture in vitro Pour la Multiplication de Merisiers Adultes (Prunus avium L.) Sélectionnés en Forêt. Agronomie, EDP Sciences, 1, 633-640. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:19810804Boxus, P. and Quoirin, M. (1974) La Culture de Méristèmes Apicaux de quelques Espèces de Prunus. Bulletin de la Société Royale de Botanique de Belgique, 107, 91-101.Saidi, R., Wahby, I. and Lamarti, A. (2003) Multiplication in vitro du Caroubier (Ceratonia siliqua L.) par Culture des Bourgeons. Proceedings of 3ème Congrès National de Génétique et Biologie Moléculaire, Tanger Maroc, 98 p.Onay, A., Pirinc, V., Adiyaman, F., Isikalan, ç., Tilkat, E. and Basaran, D. (2003) In Vivo and in vitro Micrografting of Pistachio, Pistacia vera L. cv. Turkish Journal of Biology, 27, 95-100.Bhatt, I.D. and Dhar, U. (2004) Factors Controlling Micropropagation of Myrica esculenta buch. -Ham. ex D. Don: a High Value Wild Edible of Kumaun Himalaya. African Journal of Biotechnology, 3, 534-540. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2004.000-2097Shwab, L. and Martins-Loução, M.A. (1988) Shoot Formation in Ceratonia siliqua Hypocotyls Callus. Proceedings of the 2nd International Carob Symposium, Valencia, 29 September-1 October 1987, 245-253.El Hamdouni, E.M., Lamarti, A. and Badoc, A. (2000) Micropropagation des Cultivars ‘Chandler’ et ‘Tudla’ de Fraisier (Fragaria X ananassa Duch.). Bulletin de la Société de Pharmacie de Bordeaux, 139, 91-104.Chalupa V. ,et al. (2002)In vitro Propagation of Mature Trees of Sorbus aucuparia L. and Field Performance of Micropropagated Trees Prague Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences 48, 529-535.Naghmouchi, S., Khouja, M.L., Rejeb, M.N. and Boussaid, M. (2008) Effect of Growth Regulators and Explant Origin on in vitro Propagation of Ceratonia siliqua L. via Cuttings. Biotechnologie, Agronomie, Société et Environnement, 12, 251-258.Vinterhalter, D. and Vinterhalter, B. (1992) Factors Affecting in vitro Propagation of Carob (Ceratonia siliqua L.). Archives of Biological Sciences, 44, 177-186.