Severe malaria is a global public health issue, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa [1] . According to the WHO, the primary victims of severe malaria are children under 5 years of age [2] [3] [4] . In-hospital lethality remains high in many Sub- Saharan African countries [5] [6] [7] . To reduce that lethality, the WHO recommended in 2013 that severe malaria be treated with artesunate as first-inten- tion therapy and quinine as second-intention therapy [1] . Indeed, the results of several studies such as South East Asian Quinine Artesunate Malaria Trial (SEAQUAMAT) group showed that parenteral artesunate reduced mortality in adults patients with severe malaria by over a third compared with quinine [8] .

In 2012, the in-hospital lethality of severe malaria in the pediatric unit of CNHU-Cotonou was estimated at 13.2% [9] . The use of artesunate began in December 2013 in this unit in parallel with the use of quinine. Eight months after the introduction of artesunate, we assessed the progress made with respect to patient outcomes to identify the benefits associated with artesunate use compared with quinine.

The present study was a cross-sectional, descriptive and analytical study conducted from January 1 to July 31, 2014, that involved children aged 1 month to 15 years who were admitted to the Pediatric Unit of the Hubert K. Maga National University Teaching Hospital of Cotonou for severe malaria. Severe malaria was defined as a blood smear positive for Plasmodium falciparum in a child with one or more signs of severe malaria according to the World Health Organization [1] . Severe malaria was treated either with injectable artesunate intravenous followed by artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) (Arthemeter-Lumefantrin tablet) or injectable quinine followed by quinine tablets. Patients in the quinine arm were given infusions of 10 mg/kg every 8 hourly. Artesunate 2.4 mg/kg bodyweight was given on admission, then at 12 H, 24 H and thereafter once daily until oral medication could be taken reliably. The oral therapies were performed when the child was able to drink, and treatment lasted seven days, regardless of the molecule used.

Recruitment was comprehensive using data from hospitalization records. The data were collected with a data-processing sheet built with hospitalization file data. The distribution of the children in both groups was random because it depended on the availability of artesunate intravenous in the pharmacy of the hospital at the time of the study, quinine being always available. Moreover, it was theirs parents who had to cover all the costs of drugs and laboratory tests. Children younger than 15 years were included if they had blood-smear positive for Plasmodium falciparum, and in the admitting physician’s clinical opinion, they had severe malaria, and they or their attendant relative or guardian gave fully informed written consent.

Patients were not included if there was a convincing history of full treatment with parenteral quinine or an artemisinin derivative for more than 24 hours before admission.

The study variables were age, type of severe malaria, type of malarial treatment, duration of parenteral treatment, length of hospital stay, death and average cost of treatment according to the antimalarial treatment used. The data (managed in a confidential manner) were retrieved and processed using SPSS 21 software. Pearson’s Chi-square test was applied when the number was above or equal to 5, Yates’ Chi correction test was applied when the number was between 5 and 2.5, and Fischer’s exact test was applied when the number was less than 2.5.

During the study, 848 children with severe malaria were identified out of a total of 2425 admissions for a hospital-based frequency rate for severe malaria of 28.3%. Of the 848 children involved, 743 were treated with quinine, and 105 were administered artesunate followed by ACT. The sex ratio was 1.12. The patient distribution by age according to the treatment received is presented in Table 1.

The mean patient age was 47 months, regardless of the type of malaria treatment, and there was no statistically significant difference in the mean patient ages in the two treatment groups. The study included 622 children under five years old (73.3%).

The primary signs of severe malaria in both groups were anemia, neurological disorders and hemoglobinuria, as indicated in Figure 1. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups.

The average duration of parenteral treatment was 1.95 days in the artesunate treatment group versus 2.45 days in the quinine treatment group, which repre- sented a statistically significant difference (p = 0.001). The distribution of children according to the type and duration of parenteral treatment is indicated in Table 2.

p < 0.001.

The average length of stay in the hospital was 5 days for the artesunate treatment group versus 5.75 days for the quinine treatment group, which represented a significant difference (p < 0.001). Table 3 indicates the distribution of children according to the treatment received and length of stay.

p < 0.001.

Six of the 105 children who received artesunate died, whereas 24 of the 848 children who received quinine died, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.07).

The total average cost of artesunate treatment was 50,600 FCFA (77 euros) per child versus 57,100 FCFA (87 euros) for quinine treatment.

Complying with the WHO recommendations, the CNHU Pediatric Unit introduced intravenous artesunate in the treatment of malaria because of its easier use and improved patient survival relative to quinine treatment [1] . This research study does confirm some of these benefits of artesunate. In this study, the hospital-based frequency of severe malaria was 28.3%, which similar to the 29.8% (n = 409) observed in Tanzania in 2012 [10] . In Togo in 2002 and Senegal in 2007, respective hospital-based frequencies of 4.37% (n = 361) and 6.4% (n = 162) were reported, respectively; these figures are much lower than those detected in this study [11] [12] . The study period for the present study included the rainy season, and malaria is holoendemic in Benin, may explain these differences. The mean age of the children involved in our cohort was 47 months old, and the majority of children were less than 5 years old (73.3%). This age group represents the group most commonly affected by severe malaria according to several research studies [6] [13] [14] . The predominance of that age group may be due to the disappearance of innate immunity provided by the presence of fetal hemoglobin, poor food diversification secondary to poverty, and the late acquisition of an immune response to malaria [15] . In Senegal, according to two studies performed in 1999 and 2007, the children aged 5 to 10 years were the most likely to be affected by severe malaria [11] [16] . The authors suggested that this pattern was characteristic of intermediary areas of malaria such as Senegal. We observed no statistically significant difference in response to artesunate or quinine with respect to age. Regardless of age, both products remained effective. Severe anemia was the most common sign of severity, consistent with reports by other studies [5] [14] [17] . This high frequency may be associated with the prevalence of iron-deficiency anemia in 30% to 60% of children under 5 years in tropical Africa [18] . Furthermore, as CNHU is the national referral hospital, certified blood is more commonly available at the hospital during periods of blood shortages relative to peripheral hospitals. Neurological manifestations were the second-most common severe malaria symptoms identified in a previous study within the same unit [19] . There was no statistically significant difference with respect to the signs of malaria severity with respect to the treatment used. However, we did observe a statistically significant difference with respect to the duration of parenteral treatment and the length of hospital stay. Artesunate seems to be associated with decreased length of parenteral treatment and decreased hospital stays in several studies [20] [21] [22] . The authors of these studies have argued that artesunate treatment is superior with respect to improvements in general patient conditions, reductions in the duration of an altered state of consciousness, frequency of seizures during treatment, length of stay and lethality. In this study, we observed no significant differences with respect to lethality rates in the two groups. In addition to the length of stay, which was reduced with artesunate treatment, the average cost of hospitalization was lower for artesunate treatment relative to quinine. This cost reduction represents an addition benefit, particularly given that a universal insurance system has not yet been instituted in Benin and given that the cost of the children’s treatment is entirely borne by their parents. The limitations of this work were the absence of matching between quinine and artesunate treatment, the duration of the study which reduced the sample size and the absence of a multicentre study

The treatment of severe childhood malaria with artesunate is superior to quinine treatments. These benefits include reductions in the parenteral treatment duration, the length of hospital stay and the average cost of treatment. In light of these benefits, the use of artesunate should be widespread but well-controlled to avoid resistance problems.

Sagbo, G.G., Zohoun, L., Bognon, G., Agossou, J., Padonou, C., Tohodjèdé, Y., Alihonou, F. and Ayivi, B. (2017) Benefits of Artesunate versus Quinine in the Treatment of Children with Severe Malaria at the National University Teaching Hospital of Cotonou. Open Journal of Pediatrics, 7, 156-163. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojped.2017.73019