<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJEpi</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Epidemiology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2165-7459</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojepi.2017.73018</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJEpi-78271</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  A Systematic Review of Factors Influencing Medication Adherence to Hypertension Treatment in Developing Countries
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lipi</surname><given-names>Dhar</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jaya</surname><given-names>Dantas</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mohammed</surname><given-names>Ali</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>International Health Programme, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>drlipidhar@hotmail.com(LD)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>08</day><month>08</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>211</fpage><lpage>250</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>May</day>	<month>18,</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>6,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>August</day>	<month>9,</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Background: Coronary heart disease (CHD), a complication of hypertension, is one of the most important and common causes of morbidity, hospitalisation, and mortality among hypertensive population. In recent decades, increased urbanisation and changes to lifestyle, diet and physical activity in developing countries have led to a major increase in the population incidence of chronic diseases including CHD. Poor medication adherence is one of the leading causes of failure to achieve hypertension control. The objective of this systematic review is to describe the prevalence of non-adherence to anti-hypertensive medications among hypertensive population in developing countries and identify factors associated with it. 
  Methods: A literature search was conducted using the following scholarly electronic databases: Proquest, PubMed, JSTOR and Science Direct. The online search engine, Google Scholar was also used to search for and identify relevant papers. Peer-reviewed full-text articles published in English on hypertensive adults in developing countries that measured adherence to antihypertensive medications and their associations with different factors were eligible for inclusion. The review followed the PRISMA reporting and analytical guidelines for systematic reviews. 
  Results: In all, 42 studies conducted across 19 developing countries were selected for the review. The mean prevalence of medication non-adherence (MNA) among the select hypertensive population was 47.34%. Very few studies were conducted in community settings and except for one, no study examined gender differences in MNA factors. The analysis revealed a range of factors that can influence MNA including low household income and socioeconomic status; knowledge and beliefs of hypertension and its management; avoiding side effects of medications; cost of medication; use of herbal preparations; absence of symptoms; irregular follow-up; and dissatisfaction with the treatment and health services provided. There was a general lack of consideration of role of health system in health care delivery, self-efficacy, cultural barriers, perceived individual risk of hypertension complications. There was also a lack of gender-specific research which is necessary at community settings given the social and economic vulnerabilities faced by women in developing countries that may affect adherence to antihypertensive medications. 
  Conclusions: Future research in developing countries should consider individual risk perceptions, cultural barriers, gender and the role of local health system in health care delivery when assessing MNA among hypertensive population at community settings.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Medication Adherence</kwd><kwd> Compliance</kwd><kwd> Hypertension</kwd><kwd> Antihypertensive Treatment</kwd><kwd> Developing Countries</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>High blood pressure or hypertension is one of the most important risk factors for cardiovascular disease and a leading cause of premature adult deaths worldwide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref1">1</xref>] . Uncontrolled hypertension causes 50% of the total coronary heart disease (CHD) deaths globally [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref1">1</xref>] . An analysis of global data reveals that of the deaths from CHD approximately 80% will occur in low and middle-income countries, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref2">2</xref>] and this is particularly common among people of low socioeconomic status [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref4">4</xref>] . Regardless of race or ethnicity, the disease also accounts for the death of one in three women globally [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref5">5</xref>] with an estimated 3.4 million women dying from CHD every year worldwide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>Among all the WHO regions, the prevalence of hypertension is highest in the African Region (46%) and lowest in the region of the Americas (35%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref7">7</xref>] . One in three adults in the South East Asia region has hypertension [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref7">7</xref>] . Findings from recent studies also indicate a higher prevalence of hypertension in middle-aged and older women compared to men in developing countries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref10">10</xref>] and CHD causes significant morbidity and mortality in women during childbearing years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>In developed countries, strong public health policies, multi-sectored preventive action and widely available diagnosis and treatment have led to an appreciable reduction in the prevalence of high blood pressure (BP) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref7">7</xref>] . As little as 2 mmHg population-wide decrease in BP can prevent 151,000 strokes and 153,000 CHD deaths globally [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref12">12</xref>] . Despite the availability of over a hundred different effective drugs for hypertension treatment, the reported rates of blood pressure control are very disappointing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref13">13</xref>] . Between 2000 and 2013, the number of deaths attributable to hypertension rose from 7.6 to 9.4 million [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref14">14</xref>] . A systematic review of the studies published from 2001 to 2007 revealed that BP was poorly controlled in developing countries, the mean proportion of control of hypertension among all hypertensive patients being only 13% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref15">15</xref>] . Poor medication adherence is one of the leading causes of failure to achieve BP control [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref16">16</xref>] . In developing countries, the degree of non-adherence is assumed to be higher particularly due to the shortage of health resources and difficulties in access to healthcare [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>The WHO defines adherence to long term therapy as “the extent to which a person’s behaviour―taking medication, following a diet, and, or executing lifestyle changes corresponds with agreed recommendations from a healthcare provider” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref4">4</xref>] . The term compliance to medicine is defined as “the extent to which a patient acts in accordance with the prescribed interval and dose of the dosing regimen” reported as a percentage of prescribed doses taken at the prescribed time interval [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref18">18</xref>] . Despite these variations, these terminologies have been used interchangeably in most studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref19">19</xref>] . Most of the studies on adherence have been undertaken in developed countries. However, healthcare access, cultural beliefs, education about chronic illnesses and the functions of medication, the nature of patient-physician interactions and social support, among many other factors, are very different in developing countries compared to developed countries and may profoundly affect rates of medication adherence [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref21">21</xref>] .</p><p>Over the past decade, though some studies have been conducted in developing countries to explore the factors influencing medication adherence among hyper- tensive patients, little has been documented about MNA and its determinants of hypertensive patients. This systematic review was conducted to address this gap and examine the prevalence of MNA among hypertensive patients as well as investigate factors affecting MNA in this population.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methods</title><p>Literature search was conducted using the electronic databases: Proquest, PubMed, JSTOR and Science Direct for articles published during 2000-15. The online search engine, Google Scholar was also used to search for and identify likely papers. The search strategy included the following terms:</p><p>・ adherence, non-adherence, compliance, persistence (related to medication adherence).</p><p>・ hypertension, high blood pressure (Blood pressure ≥140/≥90 mm of Hg).</p><p>・ belief, perception of hypertension and</p><p>・ developing countries (the World Bank classifies all low- and middle-income countries as developing countries-however, this term is not intended to imply that all economies in the group are experiencing similar development or that other economies have reached a preferred or final stage of development).</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Selection</title><p>From the initial search, 1425 titles and abstracts were identified. Duplicates were removed. Abstracts and titles were screened for relevance, and an initial list of 124 relevant articles was made (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). The full-texts of these articles were then examined to determine eligibility for inclusion in the systematic review using the following selection criteria:</p><p>The inclusion criteria for the review were clinical research:</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Results of screening process</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1890263x2.png"/></fig><p>1) Measured adherence to antihypertensive medications in developing countries.</p><p>2) Identify factors related to medication adherence with the antihypertensive treatment.</p><p>3) Enrolled hypertensive adults (18 years and older).</p><p>4) Published in English as a peer-reviewed full-text article.</p><p>We excluded studies that measured adherence of other chronic diseases or were conducted in developed countries and published in a non-English language.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Data Extraction and Analysis</title><p>The total number of relevant articles meeting the above criteria was 47, consisting of 45 peer-reviewed journal articles and two thesis papers: 40 were on quantitative studies, five on qualitative studies and two were mixed methods studies.To check the quality of quantitative studies the National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools’ quality assessment tool for quantitative studies was used [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref22">22</xref>] . Qualitative studies were checked based on NICE guidelines [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref23">23</xref>] .</p><p>A standardised data extraction form was used to record the citation details, methodology and objectives, and main findings of each paper. The following information was extracted and tabulated by the first reviewer and verified by the second and third reviewers: author name, date of publication, the country in which research was conducted, sample size, sampling method, study design, sex (% female), the adherence measure used, key findings and any statistical information (odd ratios, 95% CI p-value, correlation coefficients). A summary of the studies reviewed was provided in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</xref>. A meta-analysis of the findings was not possible due to the heterogeneity in important aspects of methodology of the</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</xref></label><caption><title> Summary of variables under the domain of demographic factors investigated by the studies</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables being investigated</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Study</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Measurement of medication adherence</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Setting and sample size</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Boima et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref26">26</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMAS 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ghana and Nigeria; N = 357</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nagarkar et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref27">27</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMAS 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >India; N = 174</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bilal et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref60">60</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Questionnaire</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pakistan; N = 113</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lalic et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref28">28</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMAS 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Serbia; N = 170</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Sex</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Khanam et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref29">29</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Questionnaire</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bangladesh; N = 29,960</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Praveen et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref30">30</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Questionnaire</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >India; N = 804</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ismael et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref31">31</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Questionnaire</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Iraq; N = 200</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bilal et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref60">60</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Questionnaire</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pakistan; N = 113</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Joho et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref32">32</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Questionnaire</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tanzania; N = 135</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Level of education</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Khanam et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref29">29</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Questionnaire</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bangladesh; N = 29,960</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bhandari et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref33">33</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMAS 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nepal; N = 154</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Boima et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref26">26</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMAS 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ghana and Nigeria; N = 357</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Household income and employment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hussain et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref34">34</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Questionnaire</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bangladesh; N = 120</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gelaw et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref35">35</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Questionnaire</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ethiopia; N = 91</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bilal et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref40">40</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Questionnaire</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pakistan; N = 113</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Type of family</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nagarkar et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref27">27</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMAS 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >India; N = 174</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Comorbidities</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hareri et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref36">36</xref>] .</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Questionnaire</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ethiopia; N = 365</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Khanam et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref29">29</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Questionnaire</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bangladesh; N = 29,960</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ambaw et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref37">37</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMAS 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ethiopia; N = 384</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Al-Ramahi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref38">38</xref>] .</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMAS 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Palestine ; N = 450</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Use of herbal preparation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Boima et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref26">26</xref>] .</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMAS 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ghana and Nigeria; N = 357</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Saleem et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref39">39</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Qualitative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pakistan</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Odusola et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref40">40</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Qualitative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nigeria</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>selected studies including sampling procedure (random/purposive) population ages, study settings (hospital/clinic/community), study design (cross-sectional/ longitudinal/qualitative) and measurement procedure of medication adherence. Descriptive analysis of studies examining similar variables and any association observed were considered to offer a simple indication of the level of evidence. Summary ranges of quantitative proportions and measures relating to prevalence and factors associated with MNA were compiled and presented. The evidence from the studies was synthesised and presented in a narrative review. The review followed the PRISMA reporting guidelines [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref24">24</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Result</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Description of the Studies</title><p>The selected studies were conducted in developing countries in Asia (22) Africa (17), the Middle East (4), South America (2), and Europe (1). Among the 42 quantitative studies, the majority (33 studies [78.57%]) were conducted in urban hospital or clinic settings, with only nine studies were carried out in community settings (five in India and one each from Bangladesh, Nepal and Nigeria). Most of the studies (34 studies) were cross-sectional quantitative in type. A study from Nigeria was mixed methods in type, comprising both quantitative and qualitative methods for data collection [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref25">25</xref>] . A summary of the characteristics and the aim of each study are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>A1.</p><p>The five qualitative studies were from India (1), Pakistan (1), Congo (1), Malaysia (1) and Nigeria (1). Three studies used one-to-one qualitative interviews, one study used focus group discussion, and one used a combination of these methods. Further details of the study designs and results are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>A1. In all of the studies, the study population included both males and females. Overall women comprised 55.98% of study participants.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Reported Adherence to Antihypertensive Treatment</title><p>To measure medication adherence, 21 (50%) of the quantitative studies used the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale’. Other scales used in the four different studies were: Medicines Team Questionnaire-Qualiaids (QAM-Q) (1); Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) (1); Hill-Bone Adherence to Blood Pressure Therapy Scale (1); Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI-10) (1); One study used Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS) and one used pill count to measure adherence. The remaining studies used questionnaires. Among them, eleven studies used structured questionnaires with established reliability and or validity, while eight studies (33%) did not cite information on their reliability or validity. The rate of MNA among hypertensive population ranged from 23% - 6.76% with the mean being 47.34%.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Factors Impacting on Adherence</title><p>The identified factors related to MNA in the reviewed studies could be categorised into seven domains: demographic; psychosocial; perceptions regarding hypertension and its severity; perceptions regarding antihypertensive treatment; perceived barriers to treatment adherence; treatment and disease related factors; and health care services.</p><sec id="s3_3_1"><title>3.3.1. Demographic Factors</title><p>Sixteen studies reported significant associations between demographic variables (such as age, sex, level of education, types of family, household income, employment, type of family, co-morbidities and use of herbal preparations)and MNA to hypertensive therapy (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</xref>).</p><p>The effect of age on medication adherence showed conflicting results. Youn- ger age was found to be significantly associated with MNA to hypertensive me- dications in India (≤57 years) [OR (odd ratio) 3.348; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.665 - 6.732] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref27">27</xref>] , Palestine (&lt;45 years) (OR = 0.40; 95% CI: 0.157 - 0.99) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref38">38</xref>] and Pakistan (≤51 years) (OR = 1.0; 95% CI: 1.00 - 1.04). The mean age of hypertensive patients who were not adherent to medications was 54.5 &#177; 13.2 years while those who were adherent had a mean age of 60.9 &#177; 12.1 years (𝑃 &lt; 0.001) in Ghana and Nigeria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref26">26</xref>] . On the other hand, a significantly lower level of adherence was identified in a study with elderly patients in Serbia. In this study patients less than 65 years were found to be more likely to adhere to their prescribed treatment, compared to older patients (AOR = 6.0; 95% CI: 2.76 - 13.04) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref28">28</xref>] .</p><p>Being female was independently and significantly associated with poor adherence in a study in India (AOR = 2.95; 95% CI: 1.39 - 6.24) with hypertensive women 2.95 times more likely to be non-adherent to their medications than men [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref30">30</xref>] . A study in Iraq also revealed that female hypertensive patients (61.7%) were more non-adherent than male (30.3%) patients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref31">31</xref>] . On the other hand, MNA was significantly associated with male gender in Pakistan (𝑃 = 0.008) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref60">60</xref>] , Tanzania (𝑃 = 0.044), [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref32">32</xref>] and Bangladesh (AOR = 1.67; 95% CI: 1.42 - 1.97) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref29">29</xref>] . However, several studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref33">33</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref41">41</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref42">42</xref>] found no significant association between gender and MNA among hypertensive patients. Thus, the effect of gender on MNA showed conflicting results across countries.</p><p>Hypertensive patients in Nepal who were illiterate almost five times less likely to be adherent to medications than those who were literate (AOR = 5.34, 95% CI: 1.23 - 23) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref33">33</xref>] . Similarly, lower level of education was significantly associated with MNA among hypertensive patients in Bangladesh (OR = 6.34; 95% CI: 1.65 - 24.41) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref34">34</xref>] . On the other hand, formal education was associated with MNA (𝑃 = 0.001) in Ghana and Nigeria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref26">26</xref>] . A study in India found that educational level was not a significant contributing factor to non-adherence [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref43">43</xref>] . From these results, it seems that educational level may not always be a good predictor of MNA.</p><p>Hypertensive patients with low monthly income (AOR = 11.60; 95% CI: 3.77 - 35.65) in Bangladesh [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref34">34</xref>] and Ethiopia (𝑃 = 0.04) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref35">35</xref>] were more non-adherent to their medications. In Pakistan, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref44">44</xref>] the likelihood of MNA was also found to be higher among unemployed persons (𝑃 = 0.002) and people with low socioeconomic status (𝑃 = 0.046). Hypertensive patients who had private businesses were 72% less likely to adhere to medication compared to government employees (AOR = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.130 - 0.606) in Ethiopia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref45">45</xref>] . Hypertensive patients living in a nuclear family setup in India were more likely to have lower adherence to medication as compared to staying in the extended family (OR = 2.67; 95% CI: 1.378 - 5.175) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref27">27</xref>] .</p><p>Hypertensive patients with co-morbidities were 50% less likely to be adherent to their medications compared to patients with no co-morbidity (AOR = 0.50: 95% CI: 0.290 - 0.893) in Ethiopia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref36">36</xref>] . In Bangladesh, hypertensive patients with cardiovascular co-morbidity were significantly associated with MNA (AOR = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.64 - 0.97) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref29">29</xref>] . A study in north-west Ethiopia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref37">37</xref>] also found that patients with no and one co-morbidity were more likely to adhere to their treatment than those with two (AOR = 2.50, 95% CI: 1.01 - 6.21) or more than two co-morbidities (AOR = 2.68, 95% CI: 1.07 - 6.71). However, having no other chronic disease (𝑃 = 0.009) was a significant factor influencing MNA among hypertensive patients in Palestine [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref38">38</xref>] .</p><p>In Ghana and Nigeria, patients who used herbal preparations for the treatment of hypertension were more likely to show MNA (𝑃 = 0.014) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref26">26</xref>] . In a qualitative study in Pakistan, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref39">39</xref>] almost all the hypertensive patients surveyed firmly supported the utilisation of traditional or herbal remedies for the control of their high BP and confirmed that usually only in the case of failure of these therapies would they seek help from modern or biomedical health care providers. A qualitative study in Nigeria found some patients with low medication adherence substituted or complemented prescribed pills with herbal remedies on their own without informing their doctor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref40">40</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_2"><title>3.3.2. Psychosocial Factors</title><p>Seven studies reported significant associations between psychosocial variables (such as family support, depression and use of social drugs) and MNA to hypertensive treatment (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>2).</p><p>An absence of household support had a strong negative effect on adherence among hypertensive patients in Ethiopia (AOR = 0.170, 95% CI: 0.030 - 0.905) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref46">46</xref>] and Nigeria (p &lt; 0.05) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref47">47</xref>] . Likewise, studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref41">41</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref49">49</xref>] in Congo reported that patients who received no support from family members regarding reminders about taking their medications were likely to be more non-compliant than the others. A qualitative study in Congo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref49">49</xref>] found that there was a perception among some family members that the hypertensive patient had brought the condition upon him-/herself by being a bad person: “They say I developed hypertension because I killed her sister’ (through witchcraft).” Though family cohesion is very high in Bangladesh, lack of an accompanying person to go to the physician/hospital was a significant factor in determining non-adherence to antihypertensive treatment (OR = 3.54; 95% CI: 1.04 - 11.99) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref34">34</xref>] . This lack of</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>2</label><caption><title> Summary of variables under the domain of psychosocial factors investigated by the studies</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables being investigated</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Study</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Study design</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Study setting and sample size</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Family support</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hussain et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref34">34</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Questionnaire</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bangladesh; N = 120</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nsitou et al.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Questionnaire</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Congo; N = 212</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lubaki et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref48">48</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Qualitative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Congo</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ali et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref46">46</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMAS 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ethiopia; N = 121</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Olowookere [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref47">47</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Questionnaire</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nigeria; N = 420</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Depression</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Boima et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref26">26</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMAS 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ghana and Nigeria; N = 357</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Use of social drugs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Khanam [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref29">29</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Questionnaire</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bangladesh; N = 29,960</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ahmed et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref48">48</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMAS 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >India; N = 334</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kamran et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref50">50</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMAS 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Iran; N = 671</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bhandari et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref33">33</xref>] .</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMAS 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nepal; N = 154</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>support may be due to lack of knowledge of the family members about the disease process. When patients are depressed, they are less likely to follow health care providers’ treatment plan for hypertension. In Ghana and Nigeria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref26">26</xref>] MNA occurred in patients who had varying degrees of depression (r = −0.208, P &lt; 0.001) (r = Pearson’s correlation coefficient).</p><p>A World Health Organization report observed that alcohol abuse and tobacco smoking were important modifiers of compliance behaviour. Patients’ habit of alcohol consumption, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref48">48</xref>] tobacco chewing, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref48">48</xref>] and smoking [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref48">48</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref50">50</xref>] were strongly associated with poor adherence to anti-hypertensive treatment in studies in India, Iran and Ethiopia. In contrast, a study in Nepal did not found any significant association between tobacco use and alcoholism with MNA among hypertensive study participants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref33">33</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_3"><title>3.3.3. Perceptions Regarding Hypertension and Its Severity</title><p>Four studies reported significant associations between variables related to perceptions of hypertension and MNA to hypertensive medications. These factors included: awareness, knowledge and belief of hypertension and knowledge of the severity of hypertension.</p><p>Researchers found that poor understanding and belief in high blood pressure were significant factors associated with MNA in Bangladesh (AOR = 12.90; 95% CI: 1.65 - 100.63) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref34">34</xref>] and in Ethiopia (P &lt; 0.01) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref35">35</xref>] . A qualitative study in Pakistan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref39">39</xref>] revealed that once patients achieved control of their high BP, they tended to discontinue their medications. Those patients with an inadequate knowledge of hypertension related complication were also more likely to be non-adherent with the treatment regimen, as found in a study in Bangladesh (OR = 23.71; 95% CI: 3.38 - 166.46) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref34">34</xref>] and Congo (OR = 2.9; 95% CI: 1.61 - 5.29) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref41">41</xref>] . Diagnosed hypertensive patients who lacked knowledge regarding the severity of hypertension were also more likely to be non-adherent to medications in Congo (AOR = 0.34: 95% CI: 0.13 - 0.94) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref41">41</xref>] and Bangladesh (AOR = 23.71; 95% CI: 3.38 - 166.46) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref34">34</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_4"><title>3.3.4. Perceptions Regarding Antihypertensive Treatment</title><p>Eight studies found significant associations between variables related to antihypertensive treatment and MNA (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>3).</p><p>Studies in Congo (AOR = 0.36; 95% CI: (0.15 - 0.83), [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref41">41</xref>] Bangladesh (AOR = 24.50; 95% CI: 6.28 - 95.58), [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref34">34</xref>] and Ethiopia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref35">35</xref>] (P &lt; 0.01) reported that patients’ lack of knowledge about hypertension management was significantly associated with non-adherence to therapy. A significant correlation between beliefs about medication and MNA was found among hypertensive patients in Ghana and Nigeria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref26">26</xref>] with patients who were worried about the adverse effects of antihypertensive drugs less likely to be adherent to their medications (r = −0.0347, P = 0.002). Qualitative studies in Pakistan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref39">39</xref>] and Malaysia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref51">51</xref>] also found patients hesitated to take medications continuously due to their lack of belief in medications. As one hypertensive patient in Pakistan commented: “Medications are hot (warm) in nature. They enter the stomach and increase temperature which interferes with digestion.” A study in Palestine found that patients with hypertension were not adhering to their medication due to the fear of dependent on medicines (AOR = 8.00; 95% CI: (2.44 - 26.19) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref38">38</xref>] . Similarly avoiding side effects of drugs (AOR = 3.0; 95% CI: 1.4 - 6.7) was an important reason for non-adherence to their treatment regimen among hypertensive patients in Nigeria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref42">42</xref>] .</p><p>Hypertensive patients who did not understand their drug regimen well were poorly adherent to their prescribed medications (AOR = 4.06, 95% CI: 1.01 - 16.32) in India [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref30">30</xref>] and Ethiopia (AOR = 0.12, 95% CI = 0.258 - 0.583) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref36">36</xref>] .</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>3</label><caption><title> Variables summarised under the domain of perceived barriers to antihypertensive treatment and MNA investigated by studies</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables being investigated</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Study</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Measurement of medication adherence</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Study setting and sample size</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Knowledge about hypertension management</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hussain et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref34">34</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Questionnaire</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bangladesh; N = 120</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nsitou et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref41">41</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Questionnaire</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Congo; N = 212</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gelaw et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref35">35</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Questionnaire</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ethiopia; N = 91</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Belief about medication</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Boima et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref26">26</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMAS 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ghana and Nigeria; N = 357</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Saleem et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref39">39</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Qualitative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pakistan</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shima et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref51">51</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Qualitative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malaysia</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Al-Ramahi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref38">38</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMAS 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Palestine; N = 450</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Avoiding side effect of medications</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Campbell et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref42">42</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMAS 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nigeria; N = 262</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hareri et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref36">36</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Questionnaire</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ethiopia; N = 365</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Praveen et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref30">30</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Questionnaire</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >India; N = 804</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Do not understand drug regimen well</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gelaw et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref35">35</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Qualitative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ethiopia</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Odusola et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref40">40</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Qualitative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nigeria</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Gelaw et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref35">35</xref>] found that insufficient information about the consequence of non-adherence to hypertension treatment contributed to the non-adherence of the hypertensive patients in Ethiopia. In Nigeria, a qualitative study also found ignorance about regular use of medication was an important contributor to medication non-adherence [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref40">40</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_5"><title>3.3.5. Perceived Barriers to Adherence</title><p>Sixteen studies found significant associations between aspects related to perceived barriers and MNA. These perceived barriers were: the cost of medications, the number of pills that needed to be taken on a daily basis, forgetfulness, side effects of medications, duration of therapy, satisfaction with the treatment and health services provided, and distance from health care centre (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>4).</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>4</label><caption><title> Variables investigated under the domain of perceived barriers and MNA</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables being investigated</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Study</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Measurement of adherence</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Study setting and sample size</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Cost of medications</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bhandari et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref33">33</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMAS 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nepal; N = 154</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nsitou [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref41">41</xref>] .</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Questionnaire</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Congo; N = 212</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eizubier [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref52">52</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pill count</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sudan ; N = 198</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Praveen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref30">30</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Questionnaire</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >India; N = 804</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >Number of pills</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bhandari et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref33">33</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMAS 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nepal; N = 154</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Srikanth et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref53">53</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMAS 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >India; N = 304</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Olowookere [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref47">47</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Questionnaire</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nigeria; N = 420</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ramli [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref54">54</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >The hill bone adherence to BP scale and MMAS 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malaysia; N = 653</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bilal et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref44">44</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Questionnaire</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pakistan; N = 113</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Srivastava et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref55">55</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Self-report and MMAS 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >India; N = 440</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Forgetfulness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Campbell et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref42">42</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Morisky Green</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nigeria; N = 262</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Al-Ramahi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref38">38</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMAS 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Palestine; N = 450</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Side effect of medicine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lalic et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref28">28</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMAS 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Serbia ; N = 170</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shima [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref51">51</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Qualitative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malaysia</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Odusola [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref40">40</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Qualitative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nigeria</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Duration of therapy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bhandari et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref33">33</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMAS 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nepal; N = 154</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hareri et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref45">45</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Questionnaire</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ethiopia; N = 286</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lalic et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref28">28</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMAS 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Serbia; N = 170</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bilal et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref44">44</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Questionnaire</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pakistan; N = 113</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hu et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref56">56</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Questionnaire</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >China; N = 318</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Distance from health care facilities</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gelaw et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref35">35</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Questionnaire</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ethiopia; N = 91</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Al Ramahi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref38">38</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMAS 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Palestine; N = 450</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ambaw et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref37">37</xref>] .</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMAS 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ethiopia; N = 384</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>In non-adherent patients surveyed in Nepal, a significantly greater proportion of patients considered the price of medications to be too high (AOR = 5.14; 95% CI: 1.1 - 23.9) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref33">33</xref>] and for which they missed taking their medications (AOR = 0.143; 95% CI: 0.02 - 0.78). The cost of medicine was also a significant factor associated with MNA among patients in Congo (OR = 1.84; 95% CI: 0.93 - 3.64) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref41">41</xref>] . Similarly, the inability to buy medications (P &lt; 0.001) was positively and significantly related to MNA in Sudan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref52">52</xref>] . Even being able to afford only some of the prescribed antihypertensive drugs (AOR = 3.70, 95% CI: 1.81 - 7.59) was also significantly related with MNA in India [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref30">30</xref>] .</p><p>In Nepal, non-adherence was significantly associated with therapy requiring more than one pill per day (AOR = 5.33; 95% CI: 1.19 - 23.7) compared to patients prescribed only one pill per day [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref33">33</xref>] . MNA was also greater among patients with higher pill burden in India, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref53">53</xref>] Nigeria, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref47">47</xref>] and Malaysia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref54">54</xref>] (P &lt; 0.05). On the other hand, a couple of studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref44">44</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref55">55</xref>] found that when patients had to take multiple medications, perhaps, they were less likely to fail to remember to take them, compared to having only one pill. A study in Pakistan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref44">44</xref>] found non-adherence was higher among those patients who were on mono- therapy and di-therapy compared to patients using 3 or &gt;3 drugs (P = 0.02).</p><p>Patients also often forget to take even once daily medications. Studies in Nigeria (OR = 14.8; 95% CI: 3.9 - 54.8) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref42">42</xref>] and Palestine (AOR = 5.12; 95% CI: 3.12 - 8.41) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref38">38</xref>] found significant correlation between forgetfulness and non- adherence among hypertensive patients.</p><p>Hypertensive patients who experienced side effects of their medications were less adherent to their medication than those who did not experience side effects in Palestine (AOR = 4.58; 95% CI: 1.87 - 11.25) and Serbia (OR = 7.95; 95% CI: 1.48 - 42.6) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref38">38</xref>] . Qualitative studies in Malaysia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref51">51</xref>] and Nigeria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref40">40</xref>] also found perceived side effects were inhibitors of antihypertensive medication adherence. However, Praveen et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref30">30</xref>] in India did not find a correlation between adverse drug events and non-adherence.</p><p>Patients who had had a diagnosis of hypertension of five or more years were less likely to adhere to treatment than those who had been diagnosed for less than five years in Nepal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref33">33</xref>] (OR = 2.98; 95% CI: 1.73 - 5.14) and Ethiopia (AOR = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.013 - 0.955) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref45">45</xref>] . Lower levels of adherence in elderly patients with longer duration of antihypertensive therapy were also found in Serbia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref28">28</xref>] . On the other hand, patients with shorter duration of hypertension were less likely to be adherent to treatment in Pakistan (&lt;5 years) (AOR = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.013 - 0.955) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref44">44</xref>] and China (&lt;3 years) (AOR = 3.31; 95% CI: 1.91 - 5.72; P &lt; 0.001) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref56">56</xref>] .</p><p>Distance from health care facilities was a significant barrier for adherence to treatment. Longer distance from medical centres contributed to MNA of hypertensive patients in Ethiopia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref35">35</xref>] . In the same way, those living in rural areas had poorer adherence to hypertensive medications in Palestine than those living in urban areas (AOR = 1.79; 95% CI: 1.10 - 2.92) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref38">38</xref>] . As the remoteness from the hospital decreased, adherence to hypertension treatment improved (AOR = 2.02; 95% CI: 1.19 - 3.43) in Ethiopia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref37">37</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_6"><title>3.3.6. Treatment and/or Disease Related Factors</title><p>Eleven studies found a number of treatment or disease related factors associated with MNA. These included absence of disease symptoms, complication, irregular follow-up, family history of hypertension and poor BP control (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>5).</p><p>The absence of symptoms significantly contributed to poor compliance to hypertensive therapy in Nigeria (AOR = 3.3; 95% CI: (1.3 - 8.0) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref42">42</xref>] and India (OR = 0.414; 95% CI: 0.192 - 0.892) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref27">27</xref>] . Qualitative studies in Congo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref49">49</xref>] and India [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref58">58</xref>] also found hypertensive medications were more likely to be taken when the patient experienced symptoms of hypertension.</p><p>The presence of hypertension-related complications such as heart diseases (AOR = 21.73, 95% CI: 1.568 - 418.42 P = 0.000) was found to be associated with decreased medication adherence among patients in Ethiopia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref46">46</xref>] . In contrast, a study in Pakistan found that cases suffering from hypertension-related complications were more likely to be adherent to medications [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref57">57</xref>] .</p><p>In Nepal, those with no family history of hypertension were less adherent to their medications compared to those with a family history of high BP (OR =</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>5</label><caption><title> Variables summarised under the domain of treatment and/or disease related factors investigated by the studies</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables being investigated</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Study</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Measurement of medication adherence</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Study setting and sample size</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Absence of disease symptoms</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Campbell et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref42">42</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Morisky Green</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nigeria ; N = 262</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nagarkar et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref27">27</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMAS 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >India; N = 174</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lubaki et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref49">49</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Qualitative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Congo</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kusuma et al.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Qualitative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >India</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Odusola [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref40">40</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Qualitative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nigeria</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Presence of hypertension related complications</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ali et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref46">46</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMAS 8 and patient medication chart</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ethiopia; N = 121</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hashmi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref57">57</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >History of pill taken and MMAS 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pakistan</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Family history of hypertension</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bhandari et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref33">33</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMAS 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nepal; N = 154</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Irregular follow up</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bhandari et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref33">33</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMAS 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nepal; N = 154</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Praveen et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref30">30</xref>] .</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Questionnaire</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >India; N = 804</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Blood pressure control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Boima et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref26">26</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMAS 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ghana and Nigeria N = 357</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lalic et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref28">28</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMAS 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Serbia; N = 170</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ramli [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref54">54</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >The hill bone adherence to BP and MAASA 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malaysia; N = 653</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ali et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref46">46</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMAS 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ethiopia; N = 121</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>4.46; 95% CI: 1.21 - 16.4, P = 0.024) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref33">33</xref>] . Frequent meetings/appointments provide better monitoring of blood pressure levels, as well as the opportunity to have more access to information and can serve as the basis for adherence to antihypertensive medication management [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref59">59</xref>] . Irregular follow-up (AOR = 6.39; 95% CI: 1.22 - 33.3), [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref33">33</xref>] was significantly associated with MNA in Nepal. Similarly, an Indian study reported that a longer time since the last visit to a doctor for advice (AOR = 7.26, 95% CI: 2.65 - 19.86) was significantly related with non- adherence to hypertensive medications [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref30">30</xref>] .</p><p>Poor BP control was significantly associated with MNA in Ghana and Nigeria (P = 0.006) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref26">26</xref>] . BP values over 140/90 mmHg were also reported in 59.1% of non-adherent patients and 21.4% of adherent patients, [Chi Square (χ<sup>2</sup>) = 19.84; P &lt; 0.01; OR = 5.30 95%, CI: 2.39 - 11.85] in Serbia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref28">28</xref>] . Similarly, the average systolic and diastolic blood pressure for non-adherents was significantly higher (P = 0.05) than that in adherents in Malaysia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref54">54</xref>] . In contrast, a study in Northern Ethiopia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref46">46</xref>] found that patients at the pre-hypertension level (BP values below 140/90 mmHg) (AOR = 0.026; 95% CI: 0.003 - 0.242) were less adherent to their medications.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_7"><title>3.3.7. Health Care Services</title><p>Four studies found dissatisfaction with the health services and treatment provided’ influenced MNA significantly among hypertensive patients (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>6). A study conducted in Brazil confirmed the high correlation between MNA and dissatisfaction with health services [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref60">60</xref>] . Hypertensive individuals who were dissatisfied with the care received in primary public health services (such as reception service, scheduling appointment and care received from the health team) were more likely to not adhere to the proposed medication treatment. Inconve-</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>6</label><caption><title> Variables summarised under the domain of health care services investigated by studies</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables being investigated</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Study</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Measurement of medication adherence</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Study setting and sample size</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Dissatisfaction with the health care services received</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Barreto et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref60">60</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Morisky-Green test</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Brazil; N = 68</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lubaki et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref49">49</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Qualitative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Congo</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kusuma [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref58">58</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Qualitative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Delhi</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Odusola et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref40">40</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Qualitative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nigeria</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Inadequate information from health care Centre</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hussain et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref34">34</xref>] .</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Questionnaire</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bangladesh; N = 120</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dissatisfaction with treatment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Al-Ramahi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref38">38</xref>] .</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMAS 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Palestine; N = 450</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fewer Interaction with physicians</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hussain et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref34">34</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Questionnaire</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bangladesh; N = 120</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>nient clinic operating hours, long waiting time and under-dispensing of medications were found to be inhibitors of adherence in a qualitative study in Nigeria. Studies in Congo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref49">49</xref>] and Delhi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref58">58</xref>] found that antihypertensive medication were sometimes not readily available at health care centers. Patients waited for long periods to receive medications once they had been prescribed. Rude or unsympathetic behavior and attitudes by staff members at the health clinics was the other reason found for the dissatisfaction of the patients in Congo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref49">49</xref>] .</p><p>In Bangladesh, inadequate information from health care professionals about hypertension and its treatment (AOR = 5.16; 95% CI%: 1.13 - 23.66) were significantly associated with MNA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref34">34</xref>] . Also in Palestine, patients dissatisfied with treatment were less likely to adhere to prescribed hypertensive medications than those satisfied with their treatments (AOR = 2.93; 95% CI: 1.22 - 7.02) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref38">38</xref>] . Due to fewer interactions with the physicians, those receiving treatment at government hospitals had a 30 times greater chance of being non-adherent than those treated at private hospitals or clinics (AOR = 35.29; 95% CI 9.76 - 127.63) in Bangladesh [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref34">34</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Summary of the Result</title><p>The results of the review provide insight into factors influencing MNA of hypertensive patients. Factors related to demography, barriers for adherence and treatment and disease related factors were the most commonly examined among the studies reviewed while factors related to perceptions regarding hypertension and its severity were the least examined. Associations of MNA with demographic and psychosocial factors such as age, gender, ethnicity, level of education, co-morbidities, duration of therapy, the number of medicines, use of social drugs, were often varied and not consistent. Factors affecting MNA consistently were: low socioeconomic status and low monthly income; family support; the use of traditional herbal preparations; knowledge and belief regarding hypertension and its management; cost of medications, avoiding side effect of medications; forgetfulness; absence of symptoms; distance from health facilities; irregular follow-up; and dissatisfaction with the treatment and health services provided.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Though non-adherence to antihypertensive treatment is a significant problem in CHD management few studies on medication adherence have been conducted in developing countries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref61">61</xref>] . Moreover, the majority of these studies were conducted in hospital and clinical settings. Studies carried out in low-income community settings are extremely limited.</p><p>Our review found that although there was substantial heterogeneity in methods and populations across studies, approximately half of the participated hypertensive population both male and female 18 years and older did not adhere properly to the treatment for hypertension as prescribed by their doctors. Despite the higher prevalence of hypertension and its poor control among women in developing countries, we did not find any studies that focused specifically on this vulnerable population.Women in developing countries living with chronic non-communicable diseases such as hypertension experience particular challenges in accessing cost-effective prevention, early detection, diagnosis, treatment and care. The lack of knowledge and information regarding health, poor access to healthcare, family responsibilities, and poor economic, legal and political status further worsen their situation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref62">62</xref>] .</p><p>From 25 studies, we identified significant factors associated with MNA. A limitation of the selected studies was the fact that factors associated with MNA were not examined for gender differences. However, a study in Brazil reported reasons for non-adherence to medication and non-medication regimen in patients’ opinion according to gender [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref63">63</xref>] . Considering the magnitude of inadequately treated or controlled hypertension among women in developing countries, studies that explore factors affecting MNA in this vulnerable population areurgently needed.</p><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Implications for Hypertension Management and Research</title><p>The present review reveals that gender may not be a good predictor of non-ad- herence because of inconsistent conclusions. However, it is conceivable that women with low socioeconomic status and lower level of education are more vulnerable. Their lack of adherence might be due to their inability to buy medicines, and lack of access to free health facilities as governments in developing countries spends comparatively less of their budgets on health than developed countries. The importance of cost-related factors should be considered against the background of the relatively high out-of-pocket payments for most treatments in developing countries especially in South Asia and Africa.</p><p>The review also found that fear of side effects make some hypertensive patients stop their medications or reduce their daily doses without consulting their health care providers. Therefore, information tailored to patient’s literacy level about the side effects of prescribed medications and how to manage these should be provided to all patients. From the review, it appears that educational level may not be a good predictor of MNA. However, sceptical attitudes towards antihypertensive treatment even among educated participants necessitate the health education on hypertension and its treatment to all hypertensive patients irrespective of the patients’ educational status. Understanding potential complications of hypertension could be a motivating factor for adherence to treatment. For this to happen, patients need to be aware of the seriousness of their condition and all risks involved without being worried unnecessarily [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref64">64</xref>] . To better deal with these problems, educational interventions are required that recognise patients’ apprehension and perceptions. In particular, patients should be provided an explanation of the benefits and adverse effects of treatment. The safety of long-term use of drugs needs to be discussed, including the information that treatment does not cause physical dependence irrespective of the length of treatment.</p><p>The review indicated that adherence to antihypertensive medication treatment would be improved if patients experience positive encounters with their doctors or health care providers regarding adequate and accurate advice on achieving control of their high blood pressure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref65">65</xref>] . Among the selected studies, there was a general lack of assessment of individual risk perceptions of hypertension complications such as CHD. This is an unfortunate omission given the importance of such risk perceptions in medication adherence. Earlier studies in developed countries have shown that patients who accurately perceive their risk of cardiovascular disease are more likely to be adherent to medications and guidelines compared to those who do not perceive themselves to be at risk [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref66">66</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref67">67</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref68">68</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref69">69</xref>] . Women’s perceptions of their risk for heart disease can significantly influence their decision-making process concerning healthcare choice [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref70">70</xref>] .</p><p>The studies in the review did not examine in depth cultural and psychological issues, in particular those relating to self-efficacy (i.e. the belief that one can perform a particular behavior under differing conditions which can greatly impact on medication adherence. Cultural restrictions make it difficult for women to seek medical care from male health care providers, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref71">71</xref>] but there is, at the same time, a shortage of female health professionals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref71">71</xref>] . These issues are compounded by health systems that often fail to respond to the particular needs of women with NCDs such as hypertension [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref72">72</xref>] . Weak health systems have been identified as a major obstacle in effectively responding to the rising burden of chronic conditions such as hypertension in developing countries. Studies are required that recognise and analyse the intricate associations between health systems and their effects on hypertension management in developing countries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref73">73</xref>] . In spite of the need for research on health systems, little attention has also been given to the role of local health systems in the delivery of care for the control of hypertension. Moreover, belief-laden factors including confidence in the physician’s knowledge or ability, belief of control over one’s health and illness perception were all found to be significantly related to medication adherence in developed countries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref74">74</xref>] . Studies in developing countries especially at community settings on these factors influencing adherence would be helpful to address the knowledge gap and contribute to global strategies for addressing non-com- pliance among hypertensive patients.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Strengths and Weaknesses of the Review</title><p>We have included studies from 20 developing countries (27.40% of all developing countries). Having the study population from less than one third of the developing countries incorporated in the analysis, the conclusions of this review might not be extrapolated to the whole population of the developing countries.</p><p>Most of the studies in our review that met inclusion criteria were quantitative in type. Only half of the quantitative studies (20) chose study participants using simple or systematic random sampling techniques. Eight studies used purposive sampling method, thus their results may not be necessarily generalisable to the wider population. The remaining studies selected all eligible hypertensive patients from clinics/hospitals or communities as their study participants.</p><p>The review followed the PRISMA reporting guidelines for identifying, reporting, and synthesising research. The results of the review are robust. Most of studies selected for the review were judged to be of moderate to strong quality in terms of research rigour, reliability and validity. A large number of MNA related factors were consistently identified across different countries. However, this review was subject to a few limitations. This study included only English peer-re- viewed journal articles. The majority of the studies relied solely on self-reported adherence, which may be subject to self-presentation and recall bias. Moreover, heterogeneity in important aspects of methodology of the selected studieslimits the results that can be drawn from the synthesis of the data.MNA may also be influenced by the time in which the study was performed.Among the selected quantitative studies, only two prospective cross-sectional studies were found. Longitudinal assessment is desirable to differentiate between chronic and occasional non- adherence and related barriers that may contribute to non-adherence.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Conclusion</title><p>This systematic review examined the prevalence of MNA among hypertensive population as well as investigated factors affecting MNA. Approximately half of hypertensive men and women were found to be non-adherent to their medications. Among the selected studies, very few studies were conducted in low-in- come community settings. MNA was influenced by a range of factors including socio-economic status, knowledge of hypertension and its management, medication side effects, costs of medication, and dissatisfaction with the treatment and health services provided. There was a general lack of consideration of cultural barriers, role of health system in health care delivery, self-efficacy, and perceived individual risk of hypertension complications. Policymakers and health service providers should take these factors into account to tailor culturally appropriate intervention strategies to enhance adherence among hypertensive patients. There is also a lack of gender-specific research which is necessary given the social and economic vulnerabilities faced by women in developing countries that may affect adherence to antihypertensive medications.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>LD would like to acknowledge the Australian Postgraduate Award and Curtin University Research Scholarship for supporting her research that formed part of her PhD study.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Author Contributions</title><p>LD, JD, MA designed the study. LD Carried out the search, selected papers and extracted data. LD, JD, MA participated in data analysis and drafted the manuscript. All authors approved of the final version of the manuscript.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Dhar, L., Dantas, J. and Ali, M. (2017) A Systematic Review of Factors Influencing Medication Adherence to Hypertension Treatment in Developing Countries. Open Journal of Epidemiology, 7, 211-250. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojepi.2017.73018</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Appendix</title><table-wrap-group id="7"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>A1</label><caption><title> Overview and statistics details of the included studies</title></caption><table-wrap id="7_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Author and year</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Country</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Study aim</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sampling method and patient population<sup>a</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >% women</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Design</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Prevalence of MNA (%) and % of female not adhering</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Factors associated with medication adherence/MNA</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1. Khanam et al. 2014 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref29">29</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bangladesh</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >To describe hypertension and factors affecting adherence to treatment among hypertensive person</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N = 29,960 Stratified two stage sampling from the population of three rural sites</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cross-sectional</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26/-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Factors associated with MNA: male sex (AOR = 1.67; 95% CI: 1.42 - 1.97), hypertension diagnosed by unqualified providers (AOR = 1.52: 95% CI: 1.31 - 1.77), and patients with cardiovascular comorbidity (OR = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.64 - 0.97).</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2. Hussain et al. 2011 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref34">34</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bangladesh</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >To identify factors that influence non-adherence to antihypertensive therapy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N=120 Simple random sampling from eligible hypertensive patients of inpatient departments of a medical college and a private clinic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cross-section</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85/-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Factors determining MNA: lower level of education (OR = 6.34; 95% CI: 1.65 - 24.41), low family income (OR = 11.60; 95% CI: 3.77 - 35.65), poor Knowledge levels regarding management and consequence of untreated hypertension (OR = 24.50; 95% CI: 6.28 - 95.58), believes and understanding of disease (OR = 12.90; 95% CI: 1.65 - 100.63), lack of accompanying person to go to the physician/hospital (OR = 3.54; 95% CI:1.04 - 11.99), deficiencies in information from service provider (OR = 5.16; 95% CI%: 1.13 - 23.66) and government hospital (OR = 35.29; 95% CI: 9.76 - 127.63).</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="7_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >3. Barreto et al. 2015 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref59">59</xref>]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Brazil</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >To investigate the association between dissatisfaction with the public health service and MNA to antihypertensive therapy.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N = 392 Hypertensive patients were selected randomly and stratified way from eligible patients in outpatients of primary health care</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >60</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cross-sectional</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >42.1/-</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Factors associated with MNA: dissatisfaction with the health services: reception service (OR = 1.6; 95%CI:1.08 - 2.46; p = 0.01), scheduling appointment (OR = 2.1; 95% CI:1.31 - 3.29; p = 0.000), care received from the health team (OR = 3.8; 95% CI: 2.24 - 6.45; p = 0.000), solvability of health problems (OR = 5.4; 95% CI: 3.08 - 9.56; p = 0.00), group activities (OR = 4.7; 95% CI: 2.77 - 7.81; p = 0.00) and physician professional (OR = 6.5; 95% CI: 3.47 - 12.3; p = 0.00)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4. Dosse et al. 2009 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref63">63</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Brazil</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >To determine attendance of patients to medical appointments; the % of adherence to medication and non-medication regimens, and also identify the main reasons of hypertensive patients report for MNA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N = 68 Hypertensive patients registered in the outpatient clinic of a teaching hospital</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cross-sectional</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.76/-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Main reasons reported for MNA: emotional factor (69.1%), could not tell the reason (10.3%) and eating habits (8.8%). Statistically significant relation between men and women-reasons reported: could not tell the reason (p = 0.006), alcohol consumption (p = 0.013), and associated disease (p = 0.049)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5. Hu et al. 2013 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref56">56</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >China</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >To explore how and why patients adopt home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) and examine the association between HBPM and medication adherence.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N = 318 Eligible hypertensive patients from a community health centre.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cross-sectional</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.67/38.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Risk factors of MNA: shorter duration of hypertension (AOR = 3.31; 95% CI: 1.91 - 5.72; p &lt; 0.001) and less frequency in performing BP measurements (AOR = 2.33; 95% CI: 1.42 - 3.83; p &lt; 0.001)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="7_3"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >6. Nsitou et al. 2013 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref41">41</xref>]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Congo</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >To assess the level of compliance in hypertensive patients and identify patients-related predictors of MNA</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N = 212 Eligible hypertensive patients of outpatient departments of three urban hospital</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >57.5</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Prospective cross-sectional</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >32.5/27.86</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Patient related predictors that could predict poor adherence by bivariate analysis: no Knowledge of the treatment (OR = 4.16; 95% CI; 2.25 - 7.68; p ≤ 10<sup>−5</sup>) no knowledge of high BP related complications (OR = 2.9; 95% CI: 1.61 - 5.29; p = 0.000), other pays for the medicine (OR = 2.17; 95% CI:1.20 - 3.92; p = 0.009), no Knowledge of the severity of hypertension (OR = 3.25; 95% CI: 1.5 - 7.02; p = 0.001), costly medication (OR = 0.42; 95% CI: 0.23 - 0.76; p =0 .004), no tensinometer for self-monitoring (OR = 3.16; 95% CI: 1.44 - 6.92; p = 0.002) and not existence of family member to remind to take medication (OR = 0.52 ; 95% CI: 0.29 - 0.93) p = 0.03. After adjustment by logistic regression, statistically significant association with poor compliance: knowledge of the treatment (p = 0.0170) and perception of the severity of complication (p = 0.0373)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7. Fina Lubaki et al. 2009 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref49">49</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Congo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >To explore reasons for MNA among patients with hypertension</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N = 3 focus groups. Purposive sampling from hypertensive patients of a cardiovascular clinic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Qualitative study/Focus group interviews</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Major causes of MNA: side effects of the medications, lack of information and support, difficulty in obtaining the medication and fact that the disease is mainly silent.</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="7_4"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >8. Hareri et al. 2014 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref36">36</xref>]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ethiopia</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >To assess the prevalence of poor adherence and factors associated to anti-hypertensive treatment</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N = 365 Systematic random sampling technique to select hypertensive patients from a specialized hospital</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >51.2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cross-sectional</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >40.5</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Factors hinder adherence: age group (46 - 55) (AOR = 0.30; 95% CI: 0.142 - 0.640), lack of medication information (AOR = 0.12; 95% CI: 0.258 - 0.583) and presence of co-morbidities (AOR = 0.50; 95% CI: 0.290 - 0.893). Muslim followers were 3 times more likely to be adherent to their treatment (AOR = 3.20; 95% CI:1.69 - 6.08)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9. Ali et al. 2014 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref46">46</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ethiopia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >To investigate antihypertensive medication non-adherence and its determinants among patients</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N = 121 All eligible hypertensive patients from outpatients of two referral hospitals</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Prospective cross-sectional</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Factors significantly associated with MNA: family support (AOR = 0.170; 95% CI: 0.030 - 0.905); spot blood pressure (AOR = 0.052, 95% CI: 0.003 - 0.242), place of patient residence (AOR = 0.184; 5% CI: 0.024 - 0.597) and hypertension related complications (AOR = 21.73; 95% CI: 1.568 - 418.42)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10. Gelaw et al. 2013 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref35">35</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ethiopia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >To assess the adherence of the patients to anti-hypertensive medication and main risk factors contributing to MNA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N = 91 Purposive sampling was conducted among eligible hypertensive patients who attended a referral Hospital during the study period</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cross-sectional</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Factors contributed to MNA significantly: economic problems (p = 0.04), less awareness about hypertension and its treatment (p &lt; 0.01), social drug use (p &lt; 0.01). Other factors were distance, forget fullness, insufficient information about the effect of MNA and adverse effect understanding</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="7_5"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >11. Hareri et al. 2013 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref45">45</xref>]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ethiopia</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >To assess medication adherence and factors associated with it among hypertensive patients</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N = 286 Systematic random technique was used to selected eligible hypertensive patient from a specialised hospital</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >57.7</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cross-sectional</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >30.8/59.1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Respondents less likely to adhere to medication who had: private business (AOR = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.130 - 0.606; p = 0.001) and duration of diagnosis of five or more years (AOR = 0.11; 95% CI: 0.01 - 0.95; p = 0.045). Respondents more likely to adhere to anti-hypertensive medication: who were married (AOR = 2.00; 95% CI: 1.33 - 6.74), attended most of the time private clinic to receive health care (AOR = 6.34; 95% CI: 1.17 - 33.96), treatment duration two to four years (AOR = 3.81; 95% CI: 1.26 - 11.51) and who were motivated (AOR = 2.84; 95% CI: 1.47 - 5.43)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12. Ambaw et al. 2012 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref37">37</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ethiopia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >To assess adherence to antihypertensive therapy and associated factors among hypertensive patients on follow up</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N = 384 Systematic random sampling technique to select patients from an university teaching hospital</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cross-sectional</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.4/33.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Variables, significantly associated with treatment adherence: female sex (AOR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.28 - 0.82), knowledgeable about hypertension and its treatment (AOR = 6.21; 95% CI: 3.22 - 11.97), decreased distance from the hospital (AOR = 2.02; 95% CI: 1.19 - 3.43), having no or one co morbidity (AOR = 2.5; 95% CI: 1.01 - 6.21) and who have controlled hypertension (AOR = 2.93; 95% CI: 1.73 - 4.96)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >13. Boima et al. 2015 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref26">26</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ghana and Nigeria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >To determine factors associated with MNA among hypertensive patients</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N = 357 All eligible patients were recruited from four hospitals from Ghana and Nigeria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cross sectional</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.7/65.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Adherence showed association with concern about medications (r = −0.0347, p = 0.002) and knowledge of hypertension (r = 0.14, p = 0.006). MNA was related with: depression (r = −0.208, p &lt; 0.001), formal education (p = 0.001), younger age (p = 0.000), use of herbal preparation (p = 0.014), insured participants (p = 0.032) and poor BP control (p = 0.006).</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="7_6"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >14. Srivastava et al. 2015 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref55">55</xref>]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >India</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Measuring the medication adherence using validated tools and investigating the patient, disease, medication and health care system related factors affecting adherence to antihypertensive therapy.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N = 440 Multistage sampling method to select eligible hypertensive patient from the community</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >54.7</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cross sectional</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >27/30.8</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Older people was found to be significantly and independently associated with better adherence. Patients on mono therapy were less adherent compared to those on two or three drugs. Patients who were aware of the association between certain risk factors for hypertension had better adherence.</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15. Srikanth et al. 2015 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref53">53</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >India</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >To provide screening for hypertension to all the elderly and assess their compliance to medication</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N = 304 All elderly individuals &gt; 60 years residing in an urban slum.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cross-sectional</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.6/-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson’s Chi square test showed significant association (p &lt; 0.005) between compliance to medication and number of drugs consumed. With increase in number of drugs to be consumed, the adherence to medication decreased (p = 0.039)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16. Venkatachalam et al. 2015 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref75">75</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >India</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >To study the factors determining adherence to antihypertensive medication</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N = 473 All eligible hypertensive individual willing to participate from a community.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cross-sectional</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.89/74.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >The participants exhibited poor adherence with lifestyle factors like unrestricted meal habits (OR = 4.8), alcohol consumption (OR = 3.1), smoking (OR = 12.9), and salt intake &gt; 5 gm (OR = 3.6). Adherence was significantly higher among respondents taking only one medication and once daily compared with individuals taking four types of medication and as frequent as three or more times a day.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >17. Kumar et al. 2014 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref76">76</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >India</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >To assess the level of adherence and the factors influencing adherence among hypertensive patients</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N = 120 All eligible consenting hypertensive patients attending medicine outpatient department and peripheral outreach clinic of a medical college</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cross-sectional</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.8/50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Factors significantly associated with good adherence: absence of side-effects (OR = 0.1; 95% CI: 0.03 - 0.52; p = 0.003) availability of free medication (OR = 0.4; 95% CI: 0.2 - 0.9; p = 0.030) and regular checkup of BP (OR = 0.5; 95% CI: 0.2 - 0.9; p = 0.034)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="7_7"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >18. Rao et al. 2014 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref77">77</xref>]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >India</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >To assess adherence to antihypertensive therapy and to assess associated factors for adherence among hypertensive patients</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N = 220 Eligible hypertensive patient residing in an urban slum settlement</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >59.1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cross-sectional</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >39.4/35.8</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Factors contributed to treatment adherence significantly (p &lt; 0.05): patient &gt; 60 years of age (67.2%) (OR = 1.91; 95% CI: 3.40 - 1.08), married people (84.7%) (OR = 3.45; 95% CI: 8.43 - 1.37); nonsmokers (74.8%) (OR = 3.83; 95% CI: 7.01 - 2.12), non-tobacco users (68.9%) (OR = 6.36; 95% CI: 14.63 - 2.93) and people consuming 1 tablet a day (67.7%) (OR = 2.26; 95% CI: 4.11 - 1.26)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >19. Nagarkar et al. 2013 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref27">27</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >India</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >To translate and validate MMAS-8 and to determine association between patient characteristics and medicine adherence in hypertension</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N = 174 Randomly selected hypertensive patients attending medicine outpatients of a district hospital</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cross-sectional</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.5/70.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MNA was significantly associated with patients (p &lt; 0.05): age less than 57 year (OR = 3.348; 95% CI: 1.665 - 6.732), living in nuclear family setup (OR = 2.670; 95% CI: 1.378 - 5.175) and not experience of symptoms of hypertension (OR = 0.414; 95% CI: 0.192 - 0.892)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20. Ahmad, S. 2013 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref48">48</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >India</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >To assess the level of adherence and associated factors to antihypertensive treatment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N = 334 Purposive sampling of hypertensive patients reporting to a urban health and training centre</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cross-sectional</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.8/53.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good adherence to treatment was present more among males (OR = 1.25) and in those patients who were either receiving one medicine per day (OR = 4.27), or taking medicine once a day (OR = 1.96). Poor adherence to anti-hypertensive treatment was seen in patients with the habit of alcohol consumption (OR = 0.52), tobacco chewing (OR = 0.73) and smoking (OR = 0.40)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="7_8"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >21. Bhandari, S. 2011 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref78">78</xref>]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >India</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >To determine the prevalence and predictors of adherence to modern antihypertensive pharmacotherapy</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N = 348 All the eligible hypertensive patients living in a selected urban slum</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >68</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cross-sectional</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >27/28.7</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Factors significantly associated with adherence (p &lt; 0.05): duration of hypertension for ≥ 5 years (AOR = 2.98; 95% CI: 1.73 - 5.14), hypertension was detected during checkups for conditions related to hypertension (AOR = 2.35; 95% CI: 1.25 - 4.39), living with ≤ 4 family members (AOR = 2.01; 95% CI: 1.52 - 3.50), family income of ≥ 3000 rupees (AOR = 2.56; 95% CI: 1.47 - 4.45), getting free drugs (AOR = 4.16: 95% CI: 1.36 - 12.69), perceived BP under control (AOR = 2.23: 95% CI: 1.17 - 4.26) and satisfied with current treatment (AOR = 3.77; 95% CI: 1.32 - 10.76)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >22. Dennis et al. 2010 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref43">43</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >India</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >To assess medication adherence in hypertensive patients and to identify the main barriers associated with medication adherence.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N = 608 Randomly selected hypertensive patients from the outpatient of internal medicine department of a teaching hospital</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cross-sectional</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.67/-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Belief barrier was reported in 39.14% patients. Access barrier and recall barrier were reported by 82.57% and 62.17%, respectively. 78.62% of patients reported that it is difficult to pay for the medication and 54.93% indicated that it is difficult to get a refill timely. Logistic regression analysis showed that the education level was not contributing to non-adherence (OR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.64 - 0.87). However, duration of hypertension, (p = 0.031) showed a significant contributory effect to MNA (p = 0.031). Chi square analysis showed no relation between the adherence pattern and the number of antihypertensive medications being prescribed.</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="7_9"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >23. Praveen et al. 2010 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref30">30</xref>]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >India</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >To determine factors that are associated with non-adherence to antihypertensive treatment</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N = 804 All eligible hypertensive patient from the outpatients of General Medicine department of a tertiary care hospital</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >70%</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cross-sectional</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >29/34.5</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Factors independently associated with MNA (p &lt; 0.05): female sex (OR = 2.95, 95% CI: 1.39 - 6.24), not understand drug regimen well (OR = 4.06, 95% CI: 1.01 - 16.32), affordability to only some/none of prescribed drugs (OR = 3.70, 95% CI: 1.8 - 7.59) and longer time since last visit to a health care facility (OR = 7.26; 95% CI: 2.65 - 19.86)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >24. Kusuma, Y. S. 2010 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref58">58</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >India</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >To gain insights into the perceptions of socio-economically disadvantaged migrants in Delhi regarding treatment seeking behaviour for hypertension</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N = 14 key informants and 3 focus groups. Purposive sampling from a community</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Qualitative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Treatment seeking for hypertension was not adequate. Several patient- and provider-related issues have emerged as barriers in treatment seeking and adherence.</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25. Kamran et al. 2014 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref50">50</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Iran</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >To determine the factors of adherence to hypertension medication based on HBM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N = 671 Two stage random sampling methods to select eligible hypertensive patients from rural health care centres</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cross-sectional</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76/75.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MNA was significantly associated with: unrestricted meal habits (OR = 4.8; 95% CI: 37.5), smoking (OR = 1.9; 95% CI: 1.3 - 2.9) and salt intake &gt; 5 g (OR = 19.7; 95% CI: 12.2 - 31.7). Respondents with regular physical activity and non-smokers were more adherent to medication when compared to respondents with sedentary lifestyle and smoking (p &lt; 0.01).</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="7_10"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >26. Ismael et al. 2015 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref31">31</xref>]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Iraq</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >To assess the level of compliance to treatment and identified factors contributing to poor compliance</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N = 200 Purposive sampling was used to select participants among all eligible hypertensive patients in a general teaching hospital</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >34</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cross-sectional</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >55/61.7</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Major factor for MNA was forgetfulness. There was a significant association between high level of adherence and age group of &gt; 65 years (p = 0.000), male gender (p = 0.003), no formal education (p = 0.000), and duration of hypertension less than 10 years (p = 0.003). Also there was significant relation between adherence and benefit of treatment, barrier of treatment, severity of disease, susceptibility to complication and reminder by advice from nurses (strongest predictor)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >27. Shima et al. 2013 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref51">51</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malaysia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >To explore patients’ experiences with their illnesses and the reasons which influenced them in not following hypertensive care recommendations</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N = 2 Purposive sampling from patients attending follow-up at primary health clinics</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Qualitative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Most of the reasons given for not taking antihypertensive medication were side effects or fear of the side effects of antihypertensive medication, patients’ attitudes, lack of information from health care professionals and insufficient social support</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >28. Ramli et al. 2012 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref54">54</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malaysia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >To assess adherence to medications by adult patients undergoing hypertensive treatment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N = 653 Random sampling method to select hypertensive patients from 7 primary health care clinics</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cross-sectional multicentre study</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.6/43.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female patients were found to be more likely to be adherent than male patients (OR = 1.38; 95% CI: 1.00 - 1.90; p = 0.05]). Patients from the Malay (OR = 1.68; 95% CI: 1.03 - 2.73) and Chinese ethnic group (OR = 2.64; 95% CI: 1.52 - 4.58) were also more likely to adhere, compared to patients from the Indian subgroups. The mean number of drugs that patients were taking was higher in non-adherers (3.67) than in adherers (3.17 [t = 3.81, df = 651; p = 0.001])</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="7_11"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >29. Turki. et al. 2009 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref79">79</xref>]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Malaysia</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >To identify patients with poor adherence toantihypertensive therapy and compare the levels of adherence with daily dose frequency of antihypertensive therapy</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N = 518 Convenience sampling to select hypertensive patients from a clinic of a general hospital</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >42.6</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cross-sectional</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >51.3</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Study found a significant relationship between daily dose frequency groups and adherence at level p &lt; 0.001. It shows that that who have more daily dose frequency, will show higher level of adherence towards antihypertensive medications</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30. Bhandari et al. 2015 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref33">33</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nepal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >To explore the extent of adherence towards prescribed antihypertensive treatment and to elucidate the factors of MNA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N = 154 Participants were selected from all the diagnosed hypertensive patients of a selected community by simple random sampling method</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cross-sectional</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.5/54.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Predictors of MNA by logistic regression analysis (p &lt; 0.05): Illiteracy (OR = 5.34; 95% CI: 1.23 - 23), price of medicine (OR = 5.14; 95% CI: 1.1 - 23.9), missed medicine due to cost (OR = 0.143; 95% CI: 0.02 - 0.78), no family history of hypertension (OR = 4.46, 95% CI: 1.21 - 16.4), irregular follow up (OR = 6.39: 95% CI: 1.22 - 33.3) and more than one pills per day (OR = 5.33; 95% CI: 1.19 - 23.7).</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >31. Olowookere et al. 2015 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref47">47</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nigeria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >To assess perceived family support and other factors that determine medication adherence among hypertensive patients</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N = 420 Adult patients on antihypertensive medications attending a medical outpatient clinic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cross-sectional</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Common reasons for MNA include belief of cure (43%), high cost of treatment (33%), and the experiencing of side effects (27%). Patients with good family support had better adherence compared to those with poor family support (p &lt; 0.05). MNA was higher among newly diagnosed hypertensive patients, those with higher pill burden, and those without family support (p &lt; 0.05).</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="7_12"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >32. Campbell et al. 2014 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref42">42</xref>]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Nigeria</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >To assess compliance and knowledge of antihypertensive therapy amongst outpatients attending a hypertensive clinic</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N = 262 Multistage sampling technique was used to select the eligible hypertensive patients from outpatients of a hypertension clinic</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >52.6</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cross-sectional</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >74.81/78.83</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >The significant reasons for MNA (p &lt; 0.05): forgetfulness (OR = 14.8; 95% CI: 3.9 - 54.8); ran out of prescribed drugs (OR = 1.3; 95% CI: 0.1 - 0.4); avoiding side effects (OR = 3.0; 95% CI: 1.4 - 6.7) and absence of symptoms (OR = 3.3; 95% CI: 1.3 - 8.0). Factors significantly associated with adherence to antihypertensive treatment: religion (X2 = 5.0068, df = 1, p = 0.025) and knowledge (X2 = 6.6848; df = 1, p = 0.0097; F-exact test = 0.0184)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >33. Odusola et al. 2014 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref40">40</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nigeria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >To explore patients views on hypertension management.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N = 40 Purposive sampling from a rural primary health care</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Qualitative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Facilitators of medication adherence included affordability of care (through health insurance), trust in orthodox “western” medicines, trust in doctor, dreaded dangers of hypertension, and use of prayer to support efficacy of pills. Inhibitors of medication adherence included inconvenient clinic operating hours, long waiting times, under-dispensing of prescriptions, side-effects of pills, faith motivated changes of medication regimen, herbal supplementation/ substitution of pills, and ignorance that regular use is needed. Local practices and norms were identified as important inhibitors to the uptake of healthier behaviours.</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="7_13"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >34. Osamor et al. 2011 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref25">25</xref>]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Nigeria</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >To investigate the factors associate with self-reported compliance among hypertensive subjects in a poor urban community</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N = 440 and 8 focus groups. Consecutive sampling method was used to recruit participants from a list of hypertensive patients of a poor urban community. A purposive sampling technique was used for FGD from hypertensive patients.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >65.2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Survey and qualitative interviews</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >41.5</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Factors associated with adherence: regular clinic attendance (p &lt; 0.0001); not using non-western prescription medication (p &lt; 0.00l); support from family members (p = 0.038); friends who were concerned about the respondent’s hypertension (p &lt; 0.0001) and helpful in reminding the respondent about taking medication (p &lt; 0.0001). Beliefs about cause of hypertension were not associated with compliance (p = −0.090). Reasons given for MNA in focus group discussion: feeling better, forget to take medication and cost.</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >35. Atulomah et al. 2010 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref80">80</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nigeria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >To collect information about perceived severity and threat to life from poor treatment response and medication adherence in hypertensive people</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N = 130 Systematic random technique was used to select hypertensive patients from a teaching hospital</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cross-sectional</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bivariate analysis revealed thatperception of severity of hypertension complications from poor treatment and threat to life positively correlated with medication adherence (r= 0.46; p &lt; 0.0001).</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >36. Bilal et al. 2015 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref44">44</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pakistan</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >To determine the frequency and factors associated with non-compliance to anti-hypertensive medications</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N = 113 Purposive sampling was conducted among all the eligible hypertensive patients of inpatients department of a specialized Hospital</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cross-sectional</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.14/58.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MNA was found to be associated with: male gender p = 0.008; less monthly income p = 0.046; unemployed persons (p = 0.002); duration of hypertension &lt; 5 years (p = 0.03); mono therapy and di-therapy (p = 0.02) and who paid themselves for their drugs (p = 0.06)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >37. Saleem et al. 2012 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref39">39</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pakistan</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >To explore the perceptions and experiences of hypertensive patients toward medication use and adherence.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N = 16 Purposive sampling among hypertensive patients of a government hospital</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Qualitative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >The majority of the patients carried specific unrealistic beliefs regarding the long-term use of medication; yet these beliefs were heavily accepted and practiced by the society. Physician’s attitude, patient’s past experiences, and knowledge related to hypertension were noted as major contributing factors thus resulting in non-adherence to prescribed therapy.</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="7_14"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >38. Saleem et al. 2011 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref81">81</xref>]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pakistan</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >To evaluate the association between patient’s knowledge of hypertension management and medication adherence</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N = 385 Eligible hypertensive patients from two tertiary care hospitals</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >31.2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cross-sectional observational</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >64.7</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Study shows an inverse association between knowledge scores of hypertension and adherence level. Correlation coefficient between total score of knowledge of hypertension and total adherence was −0.170 (p &lt; 0.001)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >39. Hashmi et al. 2007 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref57">57</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pakistan</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >To measure adherence to antihypertensive therapy and to investigate the factors associated with adherence in the studied population</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N = 460 Randomly selected participants from eligible hypertensive patients of two tertiary care hospitals</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cross-sectional</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23/23.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Factors significantly improved adherence (univariate analyses) were increasing age, better awareness, increasing number of pills prescribed (by multivariate analyses): number of drugs that a patient was taking (p = 0.02) and whether he/she was taking medication regularly or only for symptomatic relief (p = 0.00001)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40. Al-Ramahi et al. 2015 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref38">38</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Palestine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >To assess adherence to antihypertensive therapy and to investigate the effect of a range of demographic and psychosocial variables on medication adherence.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N = 450 Simple random sample from patients visiting outpatient clinics of governmental primary healthcare centers in addition to a group of private clinics and pharmacies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cross-sectional</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.2/54.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Factors significantly associated with MNA: younger age (&lt;45 years) (AOR = 1), living in a village (AOR = 1), forgetfulness (AOR = 5.12; 95% CI: 3.12 - 8.41), dissatisfaction with treatment (AOR = 2.93; 95% CI: 1.22 - 7.02), side effects (AOR = 4.58; 95% CI: 1.87 - 11.25), fear of getting used to medication (AOR = 8.00; 95% CI: 2.44 - 26.19) and evaluating health status as very good, good or poor (AOR = 1). Other factors (by univariate analysis): having lower income (p = 0.035); receiving a higher number of antihypertensive tablets (p = 0.001); a higher dosing frequency (p ≤ 0.0001) and having no other chronic disease (p = 0.009).</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="7_15"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >41. Zyoud et al. 2013 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref82">82</xref>]</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Palestine</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >To investigate factors associated with adherence to therapy among hypertensive patients and assess the relationship between medication adherence and treatment satisfaction</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N = 410 Convenient sampling of hypertensive patients from outpatients of a clinic and a hospital</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >52%</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >36.8</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >After adjusting the covariates using multiple regression, global treatment satisfaction was statistically significantly (p = 0.001) associated with medication adherence (R = 0.373; adjusted R2 = 0.122; F = 8.107; d f = 8; p &lt; 0.001)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >42. Lalic et al. 2013 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref28">28</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Serbia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >To evaluate the degree of adherence in hypertensive patients and to study risk factors affecting adherence and the effects of non-adherence on BP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N = 170 All eligible hypertensive patients treated in a primary health care outpatients</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cross-sectional</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MNA was associated with elderly patients, longer duration of therapy and side effects of drugs. (p &lt; 0.01). Patients &lt; 65 years were found to be more likely to adhere to their medication regimen, compared to elderly patients (χ<sup>2</sup> = 21.3; p &lt; 0.01; OR = 6.0; 95% CI: 2.76 - 13.04). BP values over 140/90 mmHg were reported in 59.1% of MNA patients and in 21.4% of adherent patients (χ<sup>2</sup> = 19.84; p &lt; 0.01; OR = 5.30; 95% CI: 2.39 - 11.85)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >43. Edo, TA. 2009 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref83">83</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Seychelles</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >To describe factors that affected compliance with hypertension medications and lifestyle modification strategies in hypertensive people</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N = 102 Systematic random sampling from all eligible hypertensive patients registered at two public health centres</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Quantitative, descriptive-co relational study</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Significant determinants of compliance behaviour: individual perception of the benefits of hypertension treatment (p = 0.0004); individual perception of risks of hypertension treatment (p = 0.0120) and cues to action (p = 0.0025 )</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >44. Bovet et al. 2002 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78271-ref84">84</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Seychelles</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >To examine the compliance to medication among newly diagnosed hypertensive patients screened from the general population of the Seychelles</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N = 50 Eligible hypertensive patients form a subset of participants in a population-based cross sectional survey</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Population based survey and follow up</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Initially 26%-after 12 months 32%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12-month adherence was higher with: skilled workers (p = 0.034); who knew their BP before diagnosis (p = 0.028) and who thought current lifestyle was important for future health (p = 0.050)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><p>Note: MNA = medication non-adherence; BP = Blood pressure; OR = odds ratio; AOR = adjusted odd ratio; 𝑟 = Pearson’s correlation coefficient. <sup>a</sup>Patient population comprised of both male and female.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.78271-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">WHO (2014) World Health Statistics 2014 Report Geneva: World Health Organization. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/112738/1/9789240692671_eng.pdf.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">WHO (2011) World Health Statistics 2011. World Health Organization, Geneva.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boutayeb, A. and Boutayeb, S. (2005) The Burden of Non Communicable Diseases in Developing Countries. International Journal for Equity in Health, 4, 2.  
https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-4-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">WHO (2003) Adherence to Long-Term Therapies: Evidence for Action. World Health Organization, Geneva, 12-30.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thom, T., Haase, N., Rosamond, W., Howard, V.J., Rumsfeld, J., Manolio, T., et al. (2006) Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2006 Update: A Report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation, 113, e85-e151.  
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.171600</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alwan, A. (2011) Global Status Report on Non Communicable Diseases 2010. World Health Organization, Geneva. http://www.who.int/chp/countries/en/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">World Health Organization (2013) High Blood Pressure-Global and Regional Overview. WHO, Regional office for South East Asia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gupta, P.C., Gupta, R. and Pendnekar, M.S. (2004) Hypertension Prevalence and Blood Pressure Trends in 88653 Subjects in Mumbai, India. Journal of Human Hypertension, 18, 853-856. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001763</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gupta, R., Guptha, S., Sharma, K.K., Gupta, A. and Deedwania, P. (2012) Regional Variations in Cardiovascular Risk Factors in India: India Heart Watch. World Journal of Cardiology, 4, 112-120. https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v4.i4.112</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gupta, R., Gupta, V.P., Sarna, M., Prakash, H., Rastogi, S. and Gupta, K.D. (2003) Serial Epidemiological Surveys in an Urban Indian Population Demonstrate Increasing Coronary Risk Factors among the Lower Socioeconomic Strata. The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India, 51, 470-477.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lozano, R., Naghavi, M., Foreman, K., Lim, S., Shibuya, K., Aboyans, V., et al. (2012) Global and Regional Mortality from 235 Causes of Death for 20 Age Groups in 1990 and 2010: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet, 380, 2095-2128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61728-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rodgers, A., Lawes, C. and MacMahon, S. (2000) Reducing the Global Burden of Blood Pressure-Related Cardiovascular Disease. Journal of Hypertension Supplement: Official Journal of the International Society of Hypertension, 18, S3-S6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pickering, T. (2001) Why Are We Doing So Badly with the Control of Hypertension? Poor Compliance Is Only Part of the Story. The Journal of Clinical Hypertension, 3, 179-182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-6175.2001.00465.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lim, S.S., Vos, T., Flaxman, A.D., Danaei, G., Shibuya, K., Adair-Rohani, H., et al. (2012) A Comparative Risk Assessment of Burden of Disease and Injury Attributable to 67 Risk Factors and Risk Factor Clusters in 21 Regions, 1990-2010: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet, 380, 2224-2260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pereira, M., Lunet, N., Azevedo, A. and Barros, H. (2009) Differences in Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment and Control of Hypertension between Developing and Developed Countries. Journal of Hypertension, 27, 963-975.  
https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283282f65</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Waeber, B., Burnier, M. and Brunner, H. (2000) How to Improve Adherence with Prescribed Treatment in Hypertensive Patients? Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, 35, S23-S26.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cramer, J.A., Roy, A., Burrell, A., Fairchild, C.J., Fuldeore, M.J., Ollendorf, D.A., et al. (2008) Medication Compliance and Persistence: Terminology and Definitions. Value Health, 11, 44-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00213.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bell, J.S., Airaksinen, M.S., Lyles, A., Chen, T.F. and Aslani, P. (2007) Concordance Is Not Synonymous with Compliance or Adherence. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 64, 710-713. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.02971_1.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vrijens, B., Vincze, G., Kristanto, P., Urquhart, J. and Burnier, M. (2008) Adherence to Prescribed Antihypertensive Drug Treatments: Longitudinal Study of Electronically Compiled Dosing Histories. BMJ, 336, 1114-1117.  
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39553.670231.25</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mills, E.J., Nachega, J.B., Buchan, I., Orbinski, J., Attaran, A., Singh, S., et al. (2006) Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy in Sub-Saharan Africa and North America: A Meta-Analysis. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 296, 679-690. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.6.679</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bangsberg, D.R., Hecht, F.M., Charlebois, E.D., Zolopa, A.R., Holodniy, M., Sheiner, L., et al. (2000) Adherence to Protease Inhibitors, HIV-1 Viral Load, and Development of Drug Resistance in an Indigent Population. AIDS, 14, 357-366.  
https://doi.org/10.1097/00002030-200003100-00008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Natioal Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (2008) Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. McMaster University, Hamilton.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">NICE (2012) Methods for the Development of NICE Public Health Guidance. 3rd Edition, National Institute for Health and Care Ecellence.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J. and Altman, D., The PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement PLoS Med.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Osamor, P.E. and Owumi, B.E. (2011) Factors Associated with Treatment Compliance in Hypertension in Southwest Nigeria. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 29, 619-628.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boima, V., Ademola, A.D., Odusola, A.O., Agyekum, F., Nwafor, C.E., Cole, H., et al. (2015) Factors Associated with Medication Nonadherence among Hypertensives in Ghana and Nigeria. International Journal of Hypertension, 205716.  
https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/205716</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nagarkar, A.M., Gadhave, S.A., Sharma, I., Choure, A. and Morisky, D. (2013) Factors Influencing Medication Adherence among Hypertensive Patients in Atertiary Care Hospital, Pune, Maharastra. National Journal of Community Medicine, 4, 559-563.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lalic, J., Radovanovic, R.V., Mitic, B., Nikolic, V., Spasic, A. and Koracevic, G. (2013) Medication Adherence in Outpatients with Arterial Hypertension. Acta Facultatis Medicae Naissensis, 30, 209-218. https://doi.org/10.2478/afmnai-2013-0013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khanam, M.A., Lindeboom, W., Koehlmoos, T.L., Alam, D.S., Niessen, L. and Milton, A.H. (2014) Hypertension: Adherence to Treatment in Rural Bangladesh— Findings from a Population-Based Study. Glob Health Action, 7, 25028.  
https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.25028</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Praveen, K.N. and Halesh, L.H. (2010) Antihypertensive Treatment: A Study on Correlates of Non Adherence in a Tertiary Care Facility. International Journal of Biological and Medical Research, 1, 248-252.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ismael, D.H. and Qadir, S.C. (2015) Factors Affecting Treatment Compliance of Hypertensive Patients in Erbil City. Kufa Journal for Nursing Sciences, 5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Joho, A.A. (2012) Factors Affecting Treatment Compliance among Hypertension Patients in three District Hospitals—Dar es Salaam. Masters Thesis, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bhandari, B., Bhattarai, M., Bhandari, M., Ghimire, A., Pokharel, P.K. and Morisky, D.E. (2015) Adherence to Antihypertensive Medications: Population Based Follow up in Eastern Nepal. Journal of Nepal Health Research Council, 13, 38-42.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hussain, S.M., Boonshuyar, C. and Ekram, A. (2011) Non-Adherence to Antihypertensive Treatment in Essential Hypertensive Patients in Rajshahi, Bangladesh. Anwer Khan Modern Medical College Journal, 2, 9-14.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gelaw, B.K., Gelaw, Y.K., Satessa, D.Ga. and G/Mariam, E.T. (2013) Assessment of Adherence of Patients with Anti-Hypertensive Medication and Factors for Non-Adherence in Amhara Region Dessie Referral Hospital, Ethiopia. International Journal of Chemical and Natural Science, 2, 51-57.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hareri, H.A., Gedefaw, M. and Simeng, B. (2014) Assessment of Prevalence and Associated Factors of Adherence to Antihypertensive Agents among Adults on Follow up in Adama Referal Hospital, East Shoa, Ethiopia-Cross Sectional Study. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 3, 760-770.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ambaw, A.D., Alemie, G.A., W/Yohannes, M.S. and Mengesha, Z.B. (2012) Adherence to Antihypertensive Treatment and Associated Factors among Patients on Follow up at University of Gondar Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Public Health, 12.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Al-Ramahi, R. (2015) Adherence to Medications and Associated Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study among Palestinian Hypertensive Patients. Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health, 5, 125-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jegh.2014.05.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saleem, F., Hassali, M., Shafie, A. and Atif, M. (2012) Drug Attitude and Adherence: A Qualitative Insight of Patients with Hypertension. Journal of Young Pharmacists: JYP, 4, 101-107. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1483.96624</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Odusola, A.O., Hendriks, M., Schultsz, C., Bolarinwa, O.A., Akande, T., Osibogun, A., et al. (2014) Perceptions of Inhibitors and Facilitators for Adhering to Hypertension Treatment among Insured Patients in Rural Nigeria: A Qualitative Study. BMC Health Services Research, 14, 624. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0624-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nsitou, M.B., Stéphane, M., Bousso and Bwira, B. (2013) Patients-Related Predictors of Poor Adherence to Antihypertensive Treatment in Congo-Brazzaville: A Cross-Sectional Study. Global Journal of Medicine and Public Health, 2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Campbell, P.C. and Oladeyi, O.O. (2014) Compliance to and Knowledge of Anti-Hypertensive Therapy amongst Hypertensive Patients Attending Lagos University Teaching Hospital (Luth), Idi-Araba, Lagos, Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences, 13, 108-115. https://doi.org/10.9790/0853-1353108115</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dennis, T., Meera, N.K., Binny, K., Sekhar, M.S., Kishore, G. and Sasidharan, S. (2011) Medication Adherence and Associated Barriers in Hypertension Management in India. CVD Prevention and Control, 6, 9-13.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvdpc.2010.11.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bilal, A., Riaz, M., Shafiq, N., Ahmed, M., Sheikh, S. and Rasheed, S. (2015) Non-Compliance to Anti-Hypertensive Medication and Its Associated Factors among Hypertensives. Journal of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad, 27, 158-163.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hareri, H.A. and Abebe, M. (2013) Assessments of Adherence to Hypertension Medications and Associated Factors among Patients Attending Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital Renal Unit, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 2012. International Journal of Nursing Science, 3, 1-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ali, M., Bekele, M. and Teklay, G. (2014) Antihypertensive Medication Non-Adherence and Its Determinants among Patients on Follow up in Public Hospitals in Northern Ethiopia. International Journal of Clinical Trials, 1, 95.  
https://doi.org/10.5455/2349-3259.ijct20141103</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Olowookere, A., Olowookere, S., Talabi, A., Etonyeaku, A., Adeleke, O. and Akinboboye, O. (2015) Perceived Family Support and Factors Influencing Medication Adherence among Hypertensive Patients Attending a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, 8, 245.  
https://doi.org/10.4103/1755-6783.162668</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ahmed</surname><given-names> S. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2015</year>)<article-title>Assessment of Adherence to Antihypertensive Treatment among Patients Attending a Health Care Facility in North India</article-title><source> International Journal of Research in Medicine</source><volume> 4</volume>,<fpage> 117</fpage>-<lpage>124</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fina Lubaki, J.-P., Mabuza, L., Malete, N., Maduna, P. and Mdimande, J. (2009) Reasons for Non-Compliance among Patients with Hypertension at Vanga Hospital, Bandundu Province, Democratic Republic of Congo: A Qualitative Study. African Journal of Primary Health Care &amp; Family Medicine, 1.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kamran, A., Sadeghieh, A.S., Biria, M., Malepour, A. and Heydari, H. (2014) Determinants of Patient’s Adherence to Hypertension Medications: Application of Health Belief Model among Rural Patients. Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research, 4, 922-926. https://doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.144914</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shima, R., Farizah, M.H. and Majid, H.A. (2014) A Qualitative Study on Hypertensive Care Behavior in Primary Health Care Settings in Malaysia. Patient Prefer Adherence, 8, 1597-1609. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S69680</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eizubier, A.G., Husain, A.A., Suleiman, A. and Hamid, Z.A. (2000) Drug Compliance among Hypertensive Patients in Kassala, Eastern Sudan. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 6, 100-105.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Srikanth, J. and Kulkarni, S. (2015) Hypertension in Elderly: Prevalence and Health Care Seeking Pattern in an Urban Slum of Bangalore City. International Journal of Recent Scientific Research, 6, 2952-2957.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ramli, A., Ahmad, N.S. and Paraidathathu, T. (2012) Medication Adherence among Hypertensive Patients of Primary Health Clinics in Malaysia. Patient Prefer Adherence, 6, 613-622.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Srivastava, A.K., Kandpal, S.D. and Sati, H. (2015) Predictors for Adherence in Hypertensive Therapy—A Study in Rural Area of District Dehradun. Indian Journal of Community Health, 27, 320-326.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hu, H., Li, G. and Arao, T. (2013) How Hypertensive Patients in the Rural Areas Use Home Blood Pressure Monitoring and Its Relationship with Medication Adherence: A Primary Care Survey in China. Open Journal of Preventive Medicine, 3, 510-516. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpm.2013.39069</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hashmi, S.K., Afridi, M.B., Abbas, K., Sajwani, R.A., Saleheen, D., Frossard, P.M., et al. (2007) Factors Associated with Adherence to Anti-Hypertensive Treatment in Pakistan. PLoS One, 2, e280. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000280</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kusuma</surname><given-names> Y.S. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2010</year>)<article-title>Migrants’ Perception on Barriers to Treatment Seeking for Hypertension: a Qualitative Study from Delhi, India</article-title><source> Ethno Med</source><volume> 4</volume>,<fpage> 173</fpage>-<lpage>176</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Barreto, Md.S., Reiners, A.A.O. and Marcon, S.S. (2014) Knowledge about Hypertension and Factors Associated with the Non-Adherence to Drug Therapy. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 22, 491-498.  
https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-1169.3447.2442</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Silva Barreto, Md., Schiavon Ganassin, G., Matsuda, L.M. and Marcon, S.S. (2015) Dissatisfaction with the Health Service and Non-Adherence to Antihypertensive Medication Treatment in Brazil. Open Journal of Nursing, 5, 49-57.  
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojn.2015.51006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jin, J., Sklar, G.E., Min Sen Oh, V. and Li, S.C. (2008) Factors Affecting Therapeutic Compliance: A Review from the Patient’s Perspective. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, 4, 269-286. https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S1458</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chatterjee, C. and Sheoran, G. (2007) Vulnerable Groups in India. The Centre for Enquiry into Health and Allied Themes (CEHAT), Mumbai.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dosse, C., Cesarino, C., Martin, J. and Castedo, M. (2009) Factors Associated to Patients’ Non Compliance with Hypertension Treatment. Latino-Am Enfermagem, 17, 201-206. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692009000200010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gadkari, A.S. and McHorney, C. (2012) Unintentional Non-Adherence to Chronic Prescription Medications: How Unintentional Is It Really? BMC Health Services Research, 12.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Benson, J. and Britten, N. (2002) Patients’ Decisions about Whether or Not to Take Antihypertensive Drugs: Qualitative Study. British Medical Journal, 325, 873-877.  
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7369.873</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kreuter, M.W. and Strecher, V.J. (1995) Changing Inaccurate Perceptions of Health Risk: Results from a Randomized Trial. Health Psychology, 14, 56-63.  
https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.14.1.56</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Van der Pligt, J. (1998) Perceived Risk and Vulnerability as Predictors of Precautionary Behavior. British Journal of Health Psychology, 3, 1-14.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8287.1998.tb00551.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rimal, R.N. (2001) Perceived Risk and Self-Efficacy as Motivators: Understanding Individuals’ Long Term Use of Health Information. Journal of Communication, 51, 633-654. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02900.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Weinstein, N.D. (1999) What Does It Mean to Understanding a Risk? Evaluating Risk Comprehension. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, 25, 15-20.  
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a024192</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cioe, P.A. (2005) Women’s Perceptions of Coronary Heart Disease—An Integrative Review. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 20, 170-176.  
https://doi.org/10.1097/00005082-200505000-00008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Banglanews 490en-Xoom.it.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oti, S.O. (2013) HIV and Noncommunicable Diseases: A Case for Health System Building. Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS, 8, 65-69.  
https://doi.org/10.1097/COH.0b013e32835b8088</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maimaris, W., Paty, J., Perel, P., Legido-Quigley, H., Balabanova, D., Nieuwlaat, R., et al. (2013) The Influence of Health Systems on Hypertension Awareness, Treatment, and Control: A Systematic Literature Review. PLoS Med, 10, e1001490.  
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001490</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chia, L.R., Schlenk, E.A. and Dunbar-Jacob, J. (2006) Effect of Personal and Cultural Beliefs on Medication Adherence in the Elderly. Drugs Aging, 23, 191-202.  
https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-200623030-00002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Venkatachalam, J., Abrahm, S.B., Singh, Z., Stalin, P. and Sathya, G.R. (2015) Determinants of Patient’s Adherence to Hypertension Medications in a Rural Population of Kancheepuram District in Tamil Nadu, South India. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 40, 33-37. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0218.149267</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kumar, N., Unnikrishnan, B., Thapar, R., Mithra, P., Kulkarni, V., Holla, R., et al. (2014) Factors Associated with Adherence to Antihypertensive Treatment among Patients Attending a Tertiary Care Hospital in Mangalore, South India. International Journal of Current Research and Review, 6, 77-85.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rao, B.B., Kabra, P.R. and Sreedhar, M. (2014) Factors Associated with Adherence to Antihypertensive Treatment among Hypertensive Persons in a Urban Slum Area of Hyderabad. Indian Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Research, 4, 471-477.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bhandari, S., Sarma, P.S. and Thankappan, K.R.P. (2011) Adherence to Antihypertensive Treatment and Its Determinants among Urban Slum Dwellers in Kolkata, India. Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health/Asia-Pacific Academic Consortium for Public Health.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Turki, A.K. and Sulaiman, S.A. (2009) Adherence to Antihypertensive Therapy in General Hospital of Penang: Does Daily Dose Frequency Matter? Jordan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Atulomah, N.O., Florence, O.M. and Oluwatosin, A. (2010) Treatment Adherence and Risk of Non-Compliance among Hypertensives at a Teaching Hospital in Ogun State, Southwest Nigeria. Acta SATECH, 3, 143-149.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saleem, F., Hassali, M., Shafie, A., Awad, A. and Bashir, S. (2011) Association between Knowledge and Drug Adherence in Patients with Hypertension in Quetta, Pakistan. Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 10, 125-132.  
https://doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v10i2.66552</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zyoud, H.S., Al-Jabi, W.S., Sweileh, M.W. and Morisky, E.D. (2013) Relationship of Treatment Satisfaction to Medication Adherence: Findings from a Cross-Sectional Survey among Hypertensive Patients in Palestine. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11, 191. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-191</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Edo, T.A. (2009) Factors Affecting Compliance with Anti Hypertensive Drug Treatment and Required Lifestyle Modifications among Hypertensive Patients on Praslin Island. Masters Thesis, University of South Africa, South Africa.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bovet, P., Burnier, M., Madeleine, G., Waeber, B. and Paccaud, F. (2002) Monitoring One-Year Compliance to Antihypertension Medication in the Seychelles. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 80, 33-39.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78271-ref85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mukora-Mutseyekwa, F.N. and Chadambuka, E.M. (2013) Drug Adherence Behavior among Hypertensive Out-Patients at a Tertiary Health Institution in Manicaland Province, Zimbabwe, 2011. Patient Prefer Adherence, 7, 65-70.  
https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S40295</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>