<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-8792</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojog.2017.78088</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG-78258</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Vaginal Discharge in the Prostitutes of the Group Y&#232;r&#234;lon of Bobo-Dioulasso: Epidemiological, Clinical and Etiological Aspects
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bambara</surname><given-names>Moussa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ouedraogo</surname><given-names>Jean Louis</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mansour</surname><given-names>Niang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Diallo</surname><given-names>Abdoul Azize</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zampaligre</surname><given-names>Idrissa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Gynécologue, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>mousbambara@yahoo.fr(BM)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>01</day><month>08</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>08</issue><fpage>871</fpage><lpage>879</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>April</day>	<month>9,</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>6,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>August</day>	<month>9,</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The authors report a cross-sectional descriptive study over 6 years, from
   December 8<sup>th</sup>, 2003 to October 27<sup>th</sup>, 2009, involving 911 women involved in the sex trade within the Y&#232;r&#234;lon group in Bobo-Dioulasso. <b>Objectives</b>: To describe the epidemiological, clinical and etiological aspects of vaginal discharge in women in the Y&#232;r&#234;lon group of the city Bobo-Dioulasso. <b>Results</b>: Frequency of vaginal discharge was 48.89%. The mean age was 28.4 years with extremes of 16 and 54 years. Single, divorced and widowed women accounted for 78.8% of the study population. Women who never attended school and those with primary education accounted for 74.3% of the study population. HIV serology was positive in 38.4% of cases. The main symptoms were genital itching, dyspareunia and urinary signs. The main germs identified in the laboratory were Candida albicans, Trichomonas vaginalis and Gardenerella vaginalis. <b>Conclusion</b>: vaginal discharge was found in 48.89% of women in the Y&#232;r&#234;lon group of Bobo-Dioulasso. The clinical study of the discharge and the laboratory results allowed a diagnosis and a better management of the leucorrhea in the group Y&#232;r&#234;lon.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Leucorrhea</kwd><kwd> Sex Trade</kwd><kwd> &lt;i&gt;Candida albicans&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> &lt;i&gt;Trichomonas vaginalis&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> &lt;i&gt;Gardenerella vaginalis&lt;/i&gt;</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Leucorrhea is non-bloody female genital discharge. It can be pathological, in this case translating a genital infection. If the vaginal discharge is usually mild, it may have an impact on the couple’s sexual and emotional life, and also could have dramatic consequence, such as ectopic pregnancy or infertility [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>Like other sexually transmitted infections (STIs), vaginal discharge promotes sexual transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>Sex workers have multiple partners, and this behavior promotes the spread of HIV and STIs. We undertook this study on the vaginal discharge in women of the Y&#232;r&#234;lon group in order to study the epidemiological, clinical and etiological aspects.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>A cross-sectional, descriptive study over a 6 years period, from December 8, 2003 to October 27, 2009 was carried out, in Bobo-Dioulasso, as part of a research project called Y&#232;r&#234;lon on the prevention and management of sexually transmitted infections and the human immunodeficiency virus in professional sex workers and women infected with HIV from the Associations of People Living with HIV.</p><p>1) Inclusion and non-inclusion criteria</p><p>Inclusion criteria</p><p>- be a woman aged 18 years and over;</p><p>- be sexually active;</p><p>- agree to participate in HIV testing and testing.</p><p>Non-inclusion criteria</p><p>- to be pregnant;</p><p>- refusal of screening Of HIV.</p><p>2) Conduct of the study</p><p>The visits included conducting a behavioral questionnaire, an Information- Education-Communication (IEC) session, counseling for HIV testing, a medical examination with genital specimens (vaginal specimen culture and sensitivity) and blood tests (serology Syphilis and HIV serology). The visit ended with a distribution of condoms and possibly drugs.</p><p>For the collection of data, a behavioral questionnaire, a follow-up register and a laboratory record were used. The variables studied were: Socio-demographic and behavioral characteristics―Clinical characteristics of the discharges and specimen’s laboratory results.</p><p>Data were entered and analyzed with the software Epi Info 2000.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>1) Frequency of vaginal discharge</p><p>A total of 911 women consulted, 445 had vaginal discharge, making a frequency of 48.8% [95% CI (45.6 - 52.1)].</p><p>2) Epidemiological characteristics</p><p>a) Socio-demographic characteristics</p><p>The mean age was 28.4 years with extremes of 16 and 54 years. The age group 20 - 29 years represented 47.1% of the (429/911). According to the marital status, singles, divorced and widows accounted for 78.8% of the population (718/911), Married 17% (155) and concubines 6.4% (58). Sex workers accounted for 23.2% of the population, while occasional prostitution was of the order of 76.8% of the group. The women out of school and those with primary education accounted for 74.42% (678/911).</p><p>For the distribution according to religion, Catholics accounted for 53.2% of the population, Muslim 46.3% and animists 0.5%.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> (below) gives the distribution of women from the Y&#232;r&#234;lon cohort according to socio-demographic characteristics.</p><p>b) Past obstetrical history</p><p>The mean gravity was 2 with extremes of 0 and 15. The mean parity was 2 with extremes of 0 and 10. Pauciparous accounted for 52.1% of the population.</p><p>c) Contraceptive methods used by women.</p><p>There is a diversity of contraceptive methods used by women in the Y&#232;r&#234;lon group.</p><p>A contraceptive method was used by 60% of women (547/911). The proportion of women using condoms alone as a contraceptive method was 43.3% (395/911). Combined oral contraception was used by 8, 7% of women (79/911) as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><p>d) Sexual hygiene</p><p>The vaginal douching was practiced by 85.8% of women (779/911). They were 93.6% practicing it more than once a day (729/779). Products such as diluted</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Socio-demographic characteristics of women in the Y&#232;r&#234;lon group</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Numbers</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age (Years)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Less than 20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >116</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 - 29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >429</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 - 39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >265</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 - 49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >More than 49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Occupation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Professional sex workers</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >211</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Occasional sex workers</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >700</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Education level</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >None</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >388</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >290</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Secondary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >228</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tertiary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Number of women</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >911</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>bleach (5 women), potassium permanganate (2 women) and lemon juice (5 women) were also used for the vaginal douche.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> below lists the products and Tablets used by women for vaginal douche.</p><p>e) HIV serological status</p><p>HIV screening was positive in 350 women, making a frequency of 38.4%. There were 5 cases of HIV2 and 6 cases of co-infection HIV1 and HIV2.</p><p>3) Clinical Features</p><p>a) Clinical features of vaginal discharge</p><p>The signs associated with vaginal discharge are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> below.</p><p>Urinary manifestations were made up of pollakiuria or dysuria.</p><p>b) Etiologic macroscopic aspects</p><p>Speculum examination revealed macroscopic features suggestive of vaginitis in 83.9% (374/445), cervicitis in 9.8% (43/445), and associated vaginitis to cer-</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of women by contraceptive method used</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Contraceptive method</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Numbers</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >None</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >364</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >COC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Implant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >IUD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male condom</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >395</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Injectable progestin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Natural methods</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Traditional methods</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >911</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Products and solutions used by women in the Y&#232;r&#234;lon group for the vaginal douching</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Products and/or solutions used</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Numbers</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Simple water</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >465</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Perfumed bath soap</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >488</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Marseille soap</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >136</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Antiseptics</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Others</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Genital functional signs (366/911)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Signs</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Numbers</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Genital itching</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >185</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dyspareunia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >139</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Urinary symptoms</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.6</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of vaginal discharge by origin</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1431401x2.png"/></fig><p>vicitis in 6.3% of cases (28/445) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>4) Biological characteristics</p><p>a) Bacterial vaginosis</p><p>Gardenerella vaginalis was found in 41.8% of cases (381/911).</p><p>b) Genital candidiasis</p><p>Candida albicans was diagnosed in 7.7% of cases (70/911).</p><p>c) Infection with Trichomonas vaginalis</p><p>Trichomonas vaginalis alone was found in 0.8% of women (7/911).</p><p>d) Mixed vaginal infections.</p><p>Mixed infections were diagnosed in 7.2% of women (66/911).</p><p>The associations were as follows:</p><p>Gardenerella vaginalis and Trichomonas vaginalis in 44 cases;</p><p>Gardenerella vaginalis and Candida albicans in 15 cases;</p><p>A combination of Candida albicans and Trichomonas vaginalis in 1 case;</p><p>And Gardenerella vaginalis, Trichomonas vaginalis and Candida albicans in 6 cases.</p><p>The <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> below shows the distribution of vaginitis according to the etiology.</p><p>e) Gonorrhea</p><p>The 724 endocervical swabs were examined directly and a culture in search of Neisseria gonorrhoeae was found to be negative.</p><p>f) Factors associated with vaginal discharge</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> below gives the prevalence of vaginal discharge syndrome (VDS) according to socio-demographic characteristics and women’s past medical history.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Epidemiological characteristics of women</p><p>Most studies of sexually transmitted infections show that the majority of patients are between the ages of 20 and 35 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref3">3</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of vaginitis according to etiology</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1431401x3.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Prevalence of vaginal discharge syndrome according to socio-demographic characteristics and women’s past medical history</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Factors</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >VDS present</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >VDS absent</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Prevalence of VDS</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >p</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Occupation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0078</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Professional sex workers</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Occasional sex workers &amp; others</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >325</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >375</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vaginal douching</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.64</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Present</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >383</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >396</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Absent</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male condom</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0621</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Used</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >179</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >216</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Non used</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >266</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >250</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >COC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.922</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Used</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Non used</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >406</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >426</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >VIH screening</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00013</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >199</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >151</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Negative</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >246</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >315</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Number of women</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >445</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >466</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>VDS: vaginal discharge syndrome.</p><p>The mean age in our series was 28.4 years. It is identical to that of Desai [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref6">6</xref>] in India, which was 28.5 years and superior to those of Wang [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref10">10</xref>] in China, Cornier [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref5">5</xref>] in Bulgaria and Reed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref11">11</xref>] in Indonesia which were respectively 23.5 years, 23.9 years and 25.8 years.</p><p>In terms of educational level, most studies show that the majority of women engaged in sex work (occasional prostitution, or professional sex workers ) are out of school or just have the level of primary education [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref11">11</xref>] . The data from our study confirm this trend, where school dropped out and primary school level accounted for 74.3% the population. They engage in risky behaviors that are rooted in poverty, ignorance and easy gain.</p><p>In terms of marital status, the percentages are disparate. Wang [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref10">10</xref>] in China reported 14% of singles and 52% of married or concubines. Reed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref11">11</xref>] in Indonesia reported 12% of singles and 70% of divorced and Desai [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref6">6</xref>] in India found 41.7% of singles and 59.3% of married.</p><p>Frequency of vaginal discharge</p><p>The prevalence of vaginal discharge in our study was 48.8%. Most data from the literature show high frequencies for vaginal discharge in this target population. It was found frequencies of 51.7%, 90% and 94% respectively in the studies of Desai in India [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref6">6</xref>] , Gaye-Diallo in Senegal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref9">9</xref>] and Fonck in Kenya [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>Prevalence of genital infections</p><p>Many studies on sex workers show a high prevalence of genital infections [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref1">1</xref>] . Lack of hygiene, promiscuity, non-use of condoms, the existence of genital tract lesions and high-risk practices during sexual intercourse are factors that promote the transmission of STIs and HIV [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref13">13</xref>] .</p><p>Our rate of 50.4% is higher than those of Reed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref11">11</xref>] in Indonesia and Wang [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref10">10</xref>] in China, which were 39% and 41% respectively. Higher rates were reported by Nguyen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref9">9</xref>] in Vietnam and Fonck [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref1">1</xref>] in Kenya, which were 75.9% and 94%, respectively. Ulcerations in the genital tract increased the risk of HIV infection, and seropositive women developed precancerous cervical lesions more rapidly (CIN2, CIN3) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>Etiologies of vaginal discharge</p><p>A variety of germs has been reported by most authors in vaginal discharge [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref14">14</xref>] . The most frequently encountered germs are Gardenerella vaginalis, Candida albicans and Trichomonas vaginalis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref15">15</xref>] . Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections have also been reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>Factors associated with vaginal discharge</p><p>The prevalence of vaginal discharge syndrome was significantly higher in HIV- infected women [p &lt; 0.00013, 95% CI (1.28 - 2.21)].</p><p>Indeed, the decline in immunity is recognized as a factor favoring opportunistic infections such as genital candidiasis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref17">17</xref>] .</p><p>Authors like Baisley [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref12">12</xref>] in Tanzani, Fonck [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref1">1</xref>] in Kenya, Gaye-Diallo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref7">7</xref>] in Senegal and Nwadioha [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref18">18</xref>] in Nigeria reported significantly higher prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in HIV-infected women.</p><p>True sex workers had a higher prevalence of vaginal discharge syndrome than occasional sex workers and other women in the population. This difference was statistically significant [p &lt; 0.0078, 95% CI (1.11 - 2.07)].</p><p>With relation to age, couple life, condom use or pill use, and the practice of vaginal douching, there was no statistically significant difference. Wang and al noted no association between the practice of vaginal douching and vaginal discharge in sex workers in China. Similarly, Demba [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref14">14</xref>] and al found no significant difference between the practice of vaginal douching and the occurrence of bacterial vaginosis.</p><p>The use of vaginal douching is a relatively widespread practice among sex workers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref13">13</xref>] . Different products were used for the genital cleaning (lemon juice, diluted bleach, diluted permanganate, soap, antiseptics). These various products used can disrupt the ecosystem of the vagina with consequences of vaginal irritations and infections. The frequent and regular practice of the vaginal douching represents for these women a means of prevention of the genital infections [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.78258-ref19">19</xref>] .</p><p>Condoms are effective means of fighting STIs and HIV when its use is optimal. Condom users accounted for 43.3% of the population.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>At the end of this study in the Y&#232;r&#234;lon group of the city Bobo-Dioulasso, the prevalence of vaginal discharge syndrome was 48.8%. The main germs found in vaginal discharge were Gardenerella vaginalis, Candida albicans and Trichomonas vaginalis. Infections were mixed in 14.4% of cases.</p><p>Improving the situation requires preventive measures, diagnosis and management of vaginal discharge in women infected with HIV and sex workers.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Moussa, B., Louis, O.J., Niang, M., Azize, D.A. and Idrissa, Z. (2017) Vaginal Discharge in the Prostitutes of the Group Y&#232;r&#234;lon of Bobo-Dioulasso: Epidemiological, Clinical and Etiological Aspects. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 7, 871-879. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2017.78088</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.78258-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fonck, K., Kidula, N., Jaoko, W., Estambele, B., Claeys, P., Ndinya-Achola, J., et al. (2000) Validity of Vaginal Discharge Algorithm among Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Woman in Nairobi, Kenya. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 76, 33-38. 
https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.76.1.33</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78258-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zimba, T.F., Apalata, T., Sturm, W.A. and Moodley, P. (2011) Aetiology of Sexualy Transmitted Infections in Maputo, Mozambique. Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, 5, 41-47.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78258-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abauleth, R., Boni, S., Kouassi-Mbengue, A., Konan, J. and Deza, S. (2006) Etiologie et prise en charge thérapeutique des leucorrhées infectieuses au CHU de Cocody (Abidjan, Cote d’Ivoire). Cahiers Santé, 16, 191-195.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78258-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baidy, B., Philippon, M., Cunin, P., Meynard, D. and Tandia-Diagana, M. (1997) Etiologie microbienne des écoulements génitaux à Nouakchott, Mauritanie. Virilogie, 1809, 1-3.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78258-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cornier, N., Petrova, E., Cavailler, P., Dentcheva, R., Terris-Prestholt, F., Janin, A., et al. (2010) Optimising the Management of Vaginal Discharge Syndrome in Bulgaria: Cost Effectiveness of four Clinical Algorithms with Risk Assessment. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 86, 303-309.  
https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.2009.040832</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78258-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Desai, V.K., Kosambiya, J.K., Thakor, H.G., Umrigar, D.D., Khandwala, B.R. and Bhuyan, K.K. (2003) Prevalence of Sexually Transmitted Infections and Performance of STI Syndromes against Aetiological Diagnosis, in Female Sex Workers of Red Light Area in Surat, India. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 79, 111-115. 
https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.79.2.111</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78258-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gaye-Diallo, A., NiangDiallo, P.A., Badiane, M., Ndoye, I., Wade, A.S., Diop, I., et al. (2008) Surveillance des infections sexuellement transmissibles au Sénégal: enquête nationale réalisée en 2006 chez 639 femmes enceintes et 605 travailleuses du sexe dans les 11 régions. International Union against Sexually Tansmitted Infections-Africa, 3, 6-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78258-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mahmoudi, R.M., Zafarghandi, S., Abbasabadi, B. and Tavallaee, M. (2011) The Epidemiology of Candida Species Associated with Vulvovaginal Candidiasis in an Iranian Patient Population. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 155, 199-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.11.022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78258-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nguyen, T.V., Khuu, N.V., Thi Le, T.T., Nguyen, A.P., Cao, V., Tham, D.C., et al. (2008) Sexually Transmitted and Risk Factors for Gonorrhea and Chlamydia in Female Sex Workers in SocTrang, Vietnam. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 35, 935-940. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181812d03</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78258-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, B.O., Li, X.M., Stanton, B., Yang, H., Fang, X., Zhao, R., et al. (2005) Vaginal Douching, Condom Use, and Sexually Transmitted Infections among Chinese Female Sex Workers. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 32, 696-702. 
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.olq.0000175403.68410.ec</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78258-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Reed, B.D., Ford, K. and Wirawa, D.N. (2001) The Bali STD/AIDS Study: Association between Vaginal Hygiene Practices and STD among Sex Workers. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 77, 46-52. https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.77.1.46</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78258-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baisley, K., Changalucha, J., Weiss, H.A., Mugeye, K., Everett, D., Hambleton, I., et al. (2009) Bacterial Vaginosis in Female Facility Workers in North-Western Tanzania: Prevalence and Risk Factors. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 85, 370-375.  
https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.2008.035543</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78258-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Imade, G., Sagay, A., Egah, D., Onwuliri, V., Grigg, M., Egbodo, C., et al. (2008) Prevalence of HIV and Other Sexually Transmissible Infections in Relation to Lemon or Lime Juice Douching among Female Sex Workers in Jos, Nageria. Sex Health, 5, 55-60. https://doi.org/10.1071/SH07047</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78258-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Demba, E., Morison, L., van der Loeff, M.S., Awasana, A.A., Gooding, E., Bailey, R., et al. (2005) Bacteria Vaginosis, Vaginal Flora Patterns and Vaginal Hygiene Practices in Patients Presenting with Vaginal Discharge Syndrome in the Gambia, West Africa. BMC Infectious Diseases, 5, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-5-12</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78258-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Varsha, C., Ved, P., Kiran, A., Vijender, K.A., Arun, S. and Sachin, P. (2012) Clinico-Microbiological Profile of Women with Vaginal Discharge in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Northern India. International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health, 1, 75-80. https://doi.org/10.5455/ijmsph.2012.1.75-80</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78258-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Casari, E., Ferrario, A., Morenghi, E. and Montanelli, A. (2010) Gardnerella, Trichomonas vaginalis, Candida, Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum in the Genital Discharge of Symptomatic Fertile and Asymptomatic Infertile Women. New Microbiologica, 33, 69-76.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78258-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ray, A., Ray, S. and George, A.T. (2011) Swaminathan n. Interventions for Prevention and Treatment of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis in Women with HIV Infection. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 10, 8739.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78258-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nwadioha, S., Egah, D., Banwat, E., Egesie, J. and Onwuezobe, I. (2011) Prevalence of Bacterial Vaginosis and Its Risk Factors in HIV/ AIDS Patients with Abnormal Vaginal Discharge. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine, 4, 156-158.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1995-7645(11)60059-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.78258-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rosenberg, M.J., Phillips, R.S. and Holmes, M.D. (1991) Vaginal Douching. Who and Why? The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 10, 753-758.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>