Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, cause of enzootic pneumonia is known for serious economic losses in pigs. The disease is prevalent all over the world. There is no published report on
Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae incidence in Grenadian pigs. The aim of this study was to estimate seroprevalence of antibodies for
Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae in non vaccinated pigs in Grenada. Sera were collected randomly from 459 pigs of all ages from all six parishes of Grenada. Sera were tested for antibodies to
Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae using an indirect Enzyme Linked Immunosorbant Assay (ELISA) kit. Antibodies to
Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae were found in 8.71% (95% CI: 0.0644 to 0.1167) pigs. The greatest percent of positives (62.5%) (95% CI: 0.4699 to 0.7582) were in youngest group <1 year, followed by 15% (95% CI: 0.0668 to 0.2946) in < 1 - 2 year > 22.5% (95% CI: 0.1211 to 0.3771) in >2 year. Positive females were overrepresented compared to males by 3:1. This is the first report on the sero-prevalence of
Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae in pigs from Grenada, West Indies.
Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae is the causative agent of Porcine Enzootic Pneumonia, and is a primary contributor to the porcine respiratory disease complex [1] . Enzootic pneumonia in pigs is a highly contagious and chronic disease [2] . M. hyopneumoniae is a gram positive, small (400 - 1200 nm) bacteria that lacks a cell wall [1] [3] . Pure infection of M. hyopneumonia does not produce serious disease, however, it produces chronic disease when concurrently infected with bacteria and other viruses. The increase in duration and severity of the disease has been reported with concurrent infection with Porcine Respiratory and Reproductive Syndrome Virus (PRRSV), porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) and Pasteurella multocida [4] [5] . Lesions with mycoplasma pneumonia are consolidation of anterio-ventral part of lungs. Since similar lesions may be also observed with other pathogens, culture of mycoplasma, PCR and serology along with study of lesions are suggested for the diagnosis. Serology is the most common tool used to determine the presence or absence of M. hyopneumoniae within a herd [1] . ELISA [6] and complement fixation test [7] were the most commonly used serological tests for M. hyopneumoniae [1] . Transmission of M. hyopneumoniae occurs either by vertical route from sow to the off spring by direct nose to nose contact [8] or aerosol transmission among pigs [9] [10] [11] [12] . M. hyopneumoniae is primarily a problem of grow-finish pigs, although disease is reported in all age groups [13] [14] . This pathogen is considered a major economic concern within the swine industry because it causes a significant reduction in the weight of growing pigs [15] . Porcine enzootic pneumonia is endemic worldwide and M. hyopneumoniae is present in almost every pig herd [16] . As far as authors are aware there is no published report on the presence of M. hyopneumoniae in Grenada and other Caribbean nation. This paper looks at the current status of M. hyopneumoniae within the pig farming industry in Grenada, West Indies with an aim to establish a current baseline of the prevalence of this pathogen.
2. Materials and Methods2.1. Ethical Approval
The project was approved by St. George’s University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).
2.2. Country of Research
Grenada is a tri-island state located between the Atlantic Ocean and the Caribbean sea, roughly 200 miles south of Trinidad and Tobago. The main island is separated into 6 parishes: St. Patrick, St. Mark, St. Andrew, St. John St. George and St. David. St George’s University is located at the southernmost tip of the island in the second largest parish St George.
2.3. Sample Size Determination and Selection of Farms
Sample size of pigs was determined using formula of Glenn 2002 [17] . The formula is N = t2(p)(1 − p)/d2. Where t = 1.96, P = estimated prevalence and d = desired level of precision. For calculation of sample size we used p = 50% and desired level of precision = 5%. An estimated sample size of 384 was determined. Depending on number of farms in various parish, a total of 18 farms were selected (5 each in St George and St. Andrew, 2 each in St. David, St. Mark, St. John and St. Patrick). Pig farms included in the study were selected randomly in all six parishes of the country. A written consent was obtained from the farm owner for inclusion in the study. Owner of the farm was informed about the objectives and benefit of the study, before obtaining the consent.
2.4. Collection of Samples
Blood samples from 459 pigs were collected randomly over a 2-year period (2014-2015) from selected swine farms throughout the 6 parishes in Grenada. A 3 - 5 ml. blood was collected by aseptic technique using anterior vena cava puncture, and a 20 gauge 1.5 inch needle. The blood was allowed to clot for 20 minutes at room temperature and transported to the Pathobiology diagnostic laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, St. George’s University in cool box over ice. Blood was centrifuged at 1500 - 2000 g for 10 - 15 minutes. The serum was removed and placed into plastic cryovial 1.0 cc tubes and frozen at a −20˚C until testing. During blood collection herd particulars for age, sex, body condition, breeding problems and other clinical information were recorded. Blood was collected from 3 age groups: <1 year, 1 - 2 year and >2 year.
2.5. Serosurveillance
Serum samples from swine were tested for antibodies against Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae. A herd and farm will be considered M. hyopneumoniae positive when at least one of the sampled pig tests positive. The seropositivity within each farm was calculated as the ratio between the number of pigs testing positive and the total number of sampled pigs on that farm. These numbers were then re-calculated within a parish to allow for a parish-to-parish comparison, enabling determination of the areas that have higher concentrations of M. hyopneumoniae. The samples were also compared by sex and age.
The serologic testing of all samples was carried out using the commercial M. hyopneumoniae ELISA (HerdChek; IDEXX Laboratories Inc, Westbrook, Maine, USA). These kits use an indirect method to detect serum antibodies. ELISA test was performed according to manufacturer’s instructions.
2.6. Statistical Analysis
The data were analyzed by the statistical methods: Fisher’s exact test, using a graphpad statistical software (http://www.graphpad.com/quickcalcs/contingency2).
3. Results
Seropositive pigs were found in all six parishes of Grenada. Out of 459 pigs 40 (8.71%; 95% CI: 0.0644 to 0.1167) were found seropositive. Results by parish and sex are presented in Table 1 and Figure 1. St. Patrick (17.39%; CI: 0.1008 to 0.2814) shows a highest number positive samples followed by St. Andrews (11.57%; CI: 0.0690 to 0.1860). St. Johns had the lowest positive samples (1.72%). Fisher’s exact test applied between value in parishes revealed the results. There were significant difference in seropositivity between St. Patrick and St. George (p value 0.0069), between St Andrew and St John (p value 0.0230) and between
Totals by parish and sex; all parishes
Parish/region wise distribution of pigs positive for antibodies against M. hypneumoniae
Parish/region
Total samples tested
Numbers positive
Percentage positive (%)
St. Andrews
121
14
11.57
St. George
113
5
4.42
St. David
33
2
6.06
St. Mark
65
6
9.23
St. John
58
1
1.72
St. Patrick
69
12
17.39
Total
459
40
8.71
Age wise distribution of samples positive for antibodies against M. hypneumoniae
Age groups
Total Pig samples positive (n = 40)
Percentage positive (%)
6 month-1 yr
25
62.5
1 yr to 2 yrs
6
15
>2 yrs
9
22.5
St. Patrick and St John (p value 0.0032).
Amongst the 3 age group of evaluated pigs, the youngest group < 1 year) had the highest positive pigs (62.5%). Older groups represented 15% (1 - 2 year) and 22.5% (>2 year). The results are presented in Table 2. Statistical analysis applying Fisher’ exact test revealed no statistical significance between pigs of <1 year and 1 - 2 year age (p value 0.0765) and between <1 year and >2 year (p value 0.2501), however, the difference of positive cases was statistically significant in pigs of age 1 - 2 year and >2 year. Seropositive pigs by age and sex are presented in Figure 2, age and seropositivity in scatter graph (Figure 3) and graph plot (Figure 4).
4. Discussion
A total number of 459 samples were tested from pigs for M. hyopneumoniae, out
Positive results by age and sex
Scatter graph demonstrating Numbers Positive by Age based on ELISA results
Box plot demonstrating Numbers Positive by Age based on ELISA results
of these samples 40 were found to be positive, giving a 8.71% prevalence for this pathogen in Grenada. The youngest group of pigs (<1 year) had high (62.5%) seroprevalence. Our findings are in agreement with previous researchers who also reported more seropositivity in younger age pigs [9] [18] [19] . In another study Grosse et al. [20] found older sows in some herds in Germany more often seropositive than younger ones. Previous researchers reported variation in the incidence of the disease in different countries of the world. The incidence varied from 2.6% in Switzerland [21] to 65% in sow herds in North-West Germany [22] . The differences in incidence of M. hyopneumoniae in various part of the world may be because of samples and the methodology used. The researchers used PCR on nasal swabs [18] [23] , various serological tests [9] [22] , bacterial cultures of lung tissue and combination of tests. Nathues et al. [19] used a combination of PCR on nasal swabs and ELISA for antibodies in serum. Makhanon et al. [24] compared the results of culture and PCR in various tissues of slaughtered pigs for the detection of different species of Mycoplasma. In the present study we used ELISA to detect antibodies in serum.
During our Seroprevalence survey for antibodies for Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae females are overrepresented compared to males by 3 to 1 (30 positive females/10 positive males) in all evaluated age groups. Females under the age of 1 year are more strongly affected. Our findings are in agreement with Nathues et al. [19] who also reported gender difference in the incidence of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae in suckling pigs. They found 56.1% incidence in females compared to 43.9% in males. Further studies on gender variation in the incidence of M. hyopneumoniae may explain the higher prevalence in females.
The variation in the incidence of seropositivity observed in different parishes of the country is not well understood since the risk factors do not differ from parish to parish. Further research is warranted to explain the current findings.
5. Conclusion
This paper presents the first report on the surveillance of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae in pigs of Grenada. Since pigs in Grenada are not vaccinated with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae vaccine, our results have shown that M. hyopneumoniae has been introduced and is circulating at a low level in the porcine population in Grenada.
6. Recommendation
There is a strong need for regular surveillance for Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae in pigs in Grenada. Focus may be also on the role of coinfections in the incidence of M. hyopneumoniae infection. Grenadian pig farmers should be educated on excellent management and housing of sows and piglets to prevent transmission of M. hyopneumonia infection in young age pigs.
Acknowledgements
Financial support from the St. George’s University Grenada in form of small research grant (SRGI) is acknowledged. The authors are grateful to the staff of the Veterinary Department of the Ministry of Agriculture, land, fisheries, forestry and the environment of Grenada, for their efforts in assisting with the field activities during sample collection.
Competing Interest
The authors declare that there is no competing interest.
Cite this paper
Vogler, T.M., Kum- thekar, S., Tiwari, K., De Allie, C. and Sharma, R.N. (2017) Current Status of M. hyopneumoniae in Pigs in Grenada, West Indies. Open Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 7, 77-84. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojvm.2017.77008
ReferencesThacker E.L. ,et al. (2004)Diagnosis of Mycoplasma hyopneumonia Journal of Swine Health and Production 12, 252-254.Whittlestone, P. (1979) Porcine Mycoplasmas. In: Tully, J.G. and Whitecomb, R.F., Eds., The Mycoplasmas, Vol. 2, Academic Press Inc., New York, 133-166.Tajima, M. and Yagihashi, T. (1982) Interaction of Mycoplasma-hyopneumonia with the Porcine Respiratory Epithelium as Observed by Electron Microscopy. Infection and Immunity, 37, 1162-1169.Amass S.F., Clark L.K., van Alstine W.G., Bowersock T.L., Murphy D.A., Knox K.E. and Albregts S.R. ,et al. (1994)Interaction of Mycoplasma hyopeumoniae and PRRSV Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 204, 102-107.Thacker, E.L., Halbur, P.G. and Thacker, B.J. (1999) Effect of Vaccination on Dual Infection with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and PRRSV. Proceedings of AASP, St Louise, 375-377.Sorensen, V., Barfod, K., Feld, N.K. and Vraa-Anderson (1993) Application of Enzyme Linked Immunosorbaent Assay for the Surveillance of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in Pigs. Revue Scientifique et Technique, 12, 593-604.
<br />https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.12.2.699Cynthia, M.K. (2005) Respiratory Diseases of Pigs. In: The Merck Veterinary Manual, 9th Edition, 1225.Sibila, M., Nofrarias, M. and Lopez-Soria, S. (2007) Exploratory Field Study on Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae Infection in Suckling Pigs. Veterinary Microbiology, 121, 352-356.Desrosiers R. ,et al. (2001)A Review of Some Aspects of the Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Control of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae Infections Journal of Swine Health and Production 9, 233-237.The Pig Site: Enzootic Pneumonia or Mycoplasma Hyopneumoniae Infection.
http://www.thepigsite.com/pighealth/article/223/enzooticpneumoniaMeyns, T., Maes, D., Dewulf, J., Vicca, J., Haesebrouck, F. and De Kruif, A. (2004) Quantification of the Spread of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae in Nursing Pigs Using Transmission Experiments. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 66, 2265-2275.Fano, E., Pijoan, C. and Dee, S. (2007) Effect of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae Colonization at Weaning on Disease Severity in Growing Pigs. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research, 71, 195-200.Muirhead, M.R. and Alexander, T.J.L. (1997) Managing and Treating Disease in Weaner, Grower and Finisher Periods. In: Muirhead, M.R., et al., Eds., Managing Pig Health and the Treatment of Disease, 5m Enterprizes Ltd., Sheffield, 283-345.Ross, R.F. (1999) Mycoplasmal Diseases. In: Straw, B.E., D’Allairs, S., Mengling, W.L. and Tayler, D.J., Eds., Diseases of Swine, 8th Edition, Iowa State University Press, Ames Iowa, 495-509.Byrt, D., Heap, P. and Pointon, A.M. (1985) Effect of Enzootic Pneumonia of Pigs on Growth Performance. Australian Veterinary Journal, 62, 13-18.
<br />https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.1985.tb06032.xMinion, F.C. (2002) Molecular Pathogenesis of Mycoplasma Animal Respiratory Pathogens. Frontiers in Bioscience, 7, 1410-1422. <br />https://doi.org/10.2741/A849Glenn, I.D. (2002) “Determination of Sample Size,” Fact Sheet PEOD-6, a Series of the Program Evaluation and Organization Development, Florida Cooperative Extension Service Institute 2002.Villarreal, I., Vranckk, K., Duchateau, L., Pasmans, F., Haesebrouck, F., Jensen, J.C., Nanjiani, L.A. and Maes, D. (2010) Early Mycoplasma hyopnumoniae Infections in European Suckling Pigs in Herds with Respiratory Problems: Detection Rate and Risk Factors. Veterinarni Medicina, 55, 318-324.Nathues, H., Doehring, S., Woeste, H., Fahrion, A., Doherr, M.G. and Beilage, E.G. (2013) Individual Risk Factors for Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae Infections in Suckling Pigs at the Age of Weaning. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 55, 44.
<br />https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-55-44Grosse, B.E., Robde, N. and Krieter, J. (2009) Seroprevalence and Risk Factors Associated with Seropositivity in Sows from 67 Herds in North West Germany Infected with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 88, 255-263.Hege, R., Zimmermann, W., Scheidegger, R. and Stark, K.D.C. (2002) Incidence of Reinfections with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae in Pig Farms Located in Respiratory Disease-Free Regions of Switzerland-Identification and Quantification of Risk Factors. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 42, 145. <br />https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-43-145Elisabeth, G.B., Rohde, N. and Krieter, J. (2009) Seroprevalence and Risk Factors Associated with Seropositivity in Sows from 67 Herds in North-West Germany Infected with Mycoplasma hyopiumoniae. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 88, 255-263.Artiushin, S., Stipkovits, L. and Minion, C.F. (1993) Development of Polymerage Chain Reaction Primers to Detect Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae. Molecular and Cellular Probes, 7, 381-385. <br />https://doi.org/10.1006/mcpr.1993.1056Makhanon, M., Tummaruk, P., Thongkamkoon, P., Thanawongnuwech, R. and Prapasarakul, N. (2012) Comparison of Detection Procedures of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, Mycoplasma hyosynoviae and Mycoplasma hyorhinis in Lungs, Tonsils and Synovial Fluid of Slaughtered Pigs and Their Distributions in Thailand. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 44, 313-318.
<br />https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-0022-z