<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJCM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Composite Materials</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2164-5612</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojcm.2017.74011</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJCM-77982</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Computational and Experimental Analyses of Detachment Force at the Interface between Carbon Fibers and Epoxy Resin
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kazuki</surname><given-names>Mori</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nobuhiko</surname><given-names>Matsumoto</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sukeharu</surname><given-names>Nomoto</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kenji</surname><given-names>Tsuruta</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, Tsushima-naka, Kita-ku, Okayama, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>ITOCHU Techno-Solutions Corp., Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company, Inc., Higashiyawata, Hiratsuka-shi, Kanagawa, Japan</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>kazuki.mori.013@ctc-g.co.jp(KM)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>26</day><month>07</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>179</fpage><lpage>184</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>June</day>	<month>1,</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>24,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>July</day>	<month>27,</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Herein, we used theoretical and experimental methods to investigate the shear fracture strengths of carbon fiber/epoxy resin interfaces. The shear strengths of carbon fiber and epoxy resin were measured using the microdroplet test, whereas interaction and binding energies were estimated using 
  Ab initio
   and molecular dynamics methods. However, binding energies did not impact the shear strength volumes determined by microdroplet tests, 
  i.e.
  , bonds between functional groups of the carbon filer and the epoxy resin were difficult to break. On the other hand, the interaction energies calculated for epoxy monomers were in good agreement with experimental data. Moreover, we determined the relationship between the simulated interaction energy and the shear fracture strength volume obtained using the microdroplet test.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Carbon Fiber–Reinforced Composite</kwd><kwd> Ab initio Method</kwd><kwd> Molecular Dynamics Simulation</kwd><kwd> Microdroplet Test</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Lightweight high-strength materials used in the aerospace industry have recently found automotive applications, as exemplified by the growing popularity of polymer composites [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77982-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77982-ref2">2</xref>] containing dispersed carbon nanotubes (CNTs). These composites, exhibiting high strength-to-weight ratios, were investigated by quantum chemical calculations and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to elucidate the underlying reasons of their superior properties. In particular, the calculation model used to investigate interactions between polymer chains and nanotubes/graphene, both were set at the quantum chemical and force field level [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77982-ref3">3</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77982-ref9">9</xref>] . Salahoor et al. elucidated the mechanism of adhesion between graphene and epoxy matrix layers and determined the corresponding interfacial fracture energy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77982-ref10">10</xref>] . Minoia et al. investigated the mechanism of interfacial interaction between polyethylene and CNTs using MD and periodic density functional theory calculations, focusing on CH-π interactions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77982-ref11">11</xref>] . Conversely, the study of Chen et al. involved pulling out single nanotubes from the polymer matrix, comparing MD simulation results with experimental data. Estimating the mechanism of adhesion between graphene and epoxy matrix layers is important for analyses of the detachment force. However, it might be a good idea to estimate the adhesion between graphene and epoxy matrix layers based on the physical properties of the epoxy resin because it is inferred that the carbon composites contain the surface epoxy resin that interacts with carbon graphene and the bulk epoxy resin. Since the above simulations did not investigate the physical properties of the epoxy resin or corresponding monomers, this work employed numerical simulations to evaluate the physical properties of epoxy monomers and the energies of their binding to carbon fibers, thus determining the optimal structures of these mechanical composites. Simulations were performed using Ab initio and MD methods, and the obtained results were compared with those of microdroplet tests.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Experimental and Numerical Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Materials</title><p>Bisphenol A diglycidyl ether (BADGE), 1,6-hexanediol diglycidyl ether (HDGE), and 3,4-epoxycyclohexylmethyl-3',4'-epoxycyclohexanecarboxylate (EHMHC) were used as epoxy resin monomers, with cyclohexane-1,2,4-tricarboxylic acid- 1,2-anhydride (H-TMAn), 1,3-bis(aminomethyl)cyclohexane (BAC), and isophoronediamine (IPDA) utilized as curing agents (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Microdroplet Test</title><p>In the microdroplet test, performed using an HM410 instrument (Tohei Sangyo Co.), the melted resin was attached to a single carbon fiber extracted from the bulk. All samples were prepared at a constant temperature of 23˚C and a relative humidity of 55%.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Calculations</title><p>Compositional optimization was performed using the B3LYP hybrid density functional with a 6-31G(d) basis set, and the epoxy binding energy was estimated for the optimized structure. Charge densities for each optimized structure were calculated at MP2 (second-order M&#248;ller-Plesset perturbation, full)/6- 31G(d) levels and also using the ChelpG method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77982-ref12">12</xref>] . In our Ab initio calculations, graphene was substituted by benzene to reduce the number of atoms in the model and thus facilitate computation. Similarly to previous studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77982-ref13">13</xref>]</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Chemical structures of (a) BADGE; (b) HDGE; (c) EHMHC; (d) H-TMAn; (e) BAC; (f) IPDA</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1810224x2.png"/></fig><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77982-ref14">14</xref>] , a COOH functional group was attached to benzene and allowed to react with epoxy monomers, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, with its binding energy estimated by the Ab initio method. The above calculations were performed using Gaussian09 software [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77982-ref15">15</xref>] . k<sub>1</sub> was showed the C?O bond of a COOH functional group. k<sub>2</sub> was showed the C?O bond which was generated after carbon atom of epoxy ring attached a COOH functional group.</p><p>Interactions between epoxy compounds were modeled using GROMACS 5.1.2 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77982-ref16">16</xref>] molecular modeling software implementing a version of AMBER03 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77982-ref17">17</xref>] . All force field MD calculations were performed in an NPT ensemble at 300 K for 30 ns under the condition of a constant number of atoms and pressure using the Nose-Hoover thermostat [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77982-ref18">18</xref>] and the Parrinello-Rahman barostat [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77982-ref19">19</xref>] . Prior to NPT simulation, we conducted structural relaxation in an NVT ensemble at 800 K for 10 ns, utilizing a unit cell with 256 molecules. The LINCE algorithm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77982-ref20">20</xref>] was applied to all constrained bonds in epoxy monomers. The simulation time step equaled 1 fs, and calculations utilized the epoxy monomer charge density estimated by the Ab initio method.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Microdroplet Test</title><p>The experimentally determined shear stress (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) varied between 59 and 65 MPa, with the maximum corresponding to the BADGE/IPDA resin.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Epoxy Monomer Binding Energies</title><p>The C?O bond binding energies of k<sub>1</sub> and k<sub>2</sub> were estimated as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, with the corresponding numerical values listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Binding constants k<sub>1</sub> and k<sub>2</sub></title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1810224x3.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Microdroplet test results</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Epoxy monomer</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Curing agent</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Resin shear strength (MPa)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BADGE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >BAC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BADGE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >H-TMAn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BADGE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >IPDA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >EHMHC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >H-TMAn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >HDGE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >H-TMAn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Calculated epoxy monomer binding energies</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Epoxy monomer</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >k<sub>1</sub> (kcal∙mol<sup>?1</sup>∙&#197;<sup>?2</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >k<sub>1</sub> (kcal∙mol<sup>?1</sup>∙&#197;<sup>?2</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BADGE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >561</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >431</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >HDGE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >373</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >281</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >EHMHC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >331</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >does not converge</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>For BADGE-benzene, k<sub>1</sub> and k<sub>2</sub> were determined as 561 and 431 kcal∙mol<sup>?1</sup>∙ &#197;<sup>?2</sup>, respectively, with the corresponding values of HDGE-benzene equaling 372 and 282 kcal mol<sup>?1</sup>∙&#197;<sup>?2</sup>. For EHMHC-benzene, k<sub>1</sub> was calculated as 331 kcal mol<sup>?1</sup>∙&#197;<sup>?2</sup>, whereas k<sub>2</sub> could not be obtained due to the non-convergence of performed calculations. Consequently, we compared the calculated binding energies and the shear strength values determined by the microdroplet test, revealing that these two parameters were not correlated. Thus, bonds between the functional groups of the carbon filer and the epoxy resin were hard to break. In addition, the calculation of binding energies was very time-intensive due to the multi-atom nature of the simulated compounds, implying that the adopted calculation method was not suitable for estimating the carbon fiber/epoxy interfacial fracture toughness.</p><p>Subsequently, we estimated interactions for each epoxy compound monomer by MD simulations. Its interaction energy meant the intermolecular interaction energy between resins in a bulk phase. The intermolecular interaction energy increased with the hardness and/or heat resisting of material [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77982-ref21">21</xref>] . The energy of bulk epoxy monomers, i.e., the interaction energy, was obtained by averaging the energies of the last 10 ns of simulation time, as indicated by Equation (1).</p><disp-formula id="scirp.77982-formula16"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1810224x4.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Since the above interactions become stronger with increasing number of atoms per molecule, the total energies of bulk epoxy monomers were divided by the number of molecules in the calculation cell to allow meaningful comparison, affording interaction energies of 39.54, 0.13, 51.04, 18.14, and 40.64 kJ∙mol<sup>?1</sup>∙nm<sup>?3</sup> for BADGE/BAC, BADGE/H-TMAn, BADGE/IPDA, EHMHC/H- TMAn, and HDGE/H-TMAn combinations, respectively. The above interaction energies increased correspond to the shear strength value of microdroplet test, implying that the detachment force for the carbon fiber/epoxy resin interface is influenced not only by interfacial energy but also by the interaction energy of epoxy monomers.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>We successfully utilized Ab initio and MD simulations to determine the intermolecular interaction energy for each epoxy monomer in bulk epoxy compound, observing a correlation between the simulated interaction energy and the shear strength determined by the microdroplet test and revealing that resin fragility possibly contributes to interfacial fracture toughness. Although we did not estimate carbon fiber/epoxy monomer interfacial energies, these energies, together with epoxy monomer interaction energies, allow the interfacial fracture toughness to be analyzed, which will be addressed in our future work.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Mori, K., Matsumoto, N., Nomoto, S. and Tsuruta, K. (2017) Computational and Experimental Analyses of Detachment Force at the Interface between Carbon Fibers and Epoxy Resin. Open Journal of Composite Materials, 7, 179-184. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojcm.2017.74011</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.77982-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moniruzzaman, M. and Winey, K.I. (2006) Polymer Nanocomposites Containing Carbon Nanotubes. Macromolecules, 39, 5194-5205.  
https://doi.org/10.1021/ma060733p</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77982-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cheng, Q., Wang, B., Zhang, C. and Liang, Z. (2010) Functionalized Carbon Nanotube Sheet/Bismaleimide Nanocomposites: Mechanical and Electrical Performance beyond Carbon-Fiber Composites. Small, 6, 763-767.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.200901957</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77982-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kar, T., Bettinger, H.F., Scheiner, S. and Roy, A.K. (2008) Noncovalent π-π Stacking and CH-π Interactions of Aromatics on the Surface of Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes: An MP2 Study. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 112, 20070-20075.  
https://doi.org/10.1021/jp807809u</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77982-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Beigbeder, A., Linares, M., Devalckenaere, M., Degee, P., Claes, M., Beljonne, D., Lazzaroni, R. and Dubois, P. (2008) CH-π Interactions as the Driving Force for Silicone-Based Nanocomposites with Exceptional Properties. Advanced Materials, 20, 1003-1007. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200701497</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77982-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wei, C. (2006) Radius and Chirality Dependent Conformation of Polymer Molecule at Nanotube Interface. Nano Letters, 6, 1627-1631.  
https://doi.org/10.1021/nl0605770</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77982-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Meyer, F., Minoia, A., Raquez, J.M., Spasova, M., Lazzaroni, R. and Dubois, P. (2010) Poly(Amino-methacrylate) as Versatile Agent for Carbon Nanotube Dispersion: An Experimental, Theoretical and Application Study. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 20, 6873-6880. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0jm00386g</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77982-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yang, H., Chen, Y., Liu, Y., Cai, W.S. and Li, Z.S. (2007) Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Polyethylene on Single Wall Carbon Nanotube. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 127, 094902. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2768060</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77982-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yang, M., Koutsos, V. and Zaiser, M. (2005) Interactions between Polymers and Carbon Nanotubes: A Molecular Dynamics Study. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 109, 10009-10014. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0442403</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77982-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, Y. and Kumar, S. (2014) Polymer/Carbon Nanotube Nano Composite Fibers— A Review. ACS Applied Materials &amp; Interfaces, 6, 6069-6087.  
https://doi.org/10.1021/am405136s</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77982-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Salahshoor, H. and Rahbar, N. (2012) Nano-Scale Fracture Toughness and Behavior of Graphene/Epoxy Interface. Journal of Applied Physics, 112, 023510.  
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4737776</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77982-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nishio, M., Hirota, M. and Umezawa, Y. (1998) The CH/π Interaction: Evidence, Nature and Consequences. Wiley-VCH, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77982-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chirlian, L.E. and Francl, M.M. (1987) Atomic Charges Derived from Electrostatic Potentials: A Detailed Study. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 8, 894-905.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.540080616</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77982-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kim, H.J., Koizhaiganova, R., Vasudevan, T., Sanjeeviraja, C. and Lee, M.-S. (2009) Single Step Synthesis of Poly (3-Octylthiophene)/Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotube Composites and Their Characterizations. Polymers for Advanced Technologies, 9, 736-741. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.1325</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77982-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kakarla, R.R., Kwang, P.L., Iyengar, G.A., Seok, K.M., Ali, M.S. and Chang, N.Y. (2006) Synthesis of Metal (Fe or Pd)/Alloy (Fe–Pd)-Nanoparticles-Embedded Multiwall Carbon Nanotube/Sulfonated Polyaniline Composites by γ Irradiation. Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry, 44, 3355-3364.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/pola.21451</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77982-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Frisch, M.J., et al. (2009) Gaussian 09, Revision A.02. Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77982-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Berendsen, H.J.C., van der Spoel, D. and van Drunen, R. (1995) GROMACS: A Message-Passing Parallel Molecular Dynamics Implementation. Computer Physics Communications, 91, 43-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4655(95)00042-E</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77982-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cornell, W.D., Cieplak, P., Bayly, C.I., Gould, I.R., Jr. Merz, K.M., Ferguson, D.M., Spellmeyer, D.C., Fox, T., Caldwell, J.W. and Kollman, P.A. (1995) A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 117, 5179-5197.  
https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00124a002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77982-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Evans, D. and Holian, B. (1985) The Nose-Hoover Thermostat. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 83, 4069-4074. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.449071</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77982-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Parrinello, M. and Rahman, A. (1981) Polymorphic Transitions in Single Crystals: A New Molecular Dynamics Method. Journal of Applied Physics, 52, 7182-7190.  
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.328693</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77982-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hess, B., Bekker, H., Berendsen, H. and Fraaije, J. (1997) LINCS: A Linear Constraint Solver for Molecular Simulations. Journal Computational Chemistry, 18, 1463-1472. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199709)18:12&lt;1463::AID-JCC4&gt;3.0.CO;2-H</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77982-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mori, K. and Sakakibara, K. (2011) Theoretical Study of Ionic Liquids on the Difference of Melting Points between Tertiary and Quaternary Ammonium Triflates. Chemistry Letters, 40, 690-692. https://doi.org/10.1246/cl.2011.690</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>