<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJAC</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Analytical Chemistry</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2156-8251</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajac.2017.87036</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJAC-77574</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Reliable Method for Steady-State Concentrations and Current over the Diagnostic Biosensor Transducers
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kurunatha</surname><given-names>Perumal Thevar Preethi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Velmurgan</surname><given-names>Meena</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Rajaram</surname><given-names>Poovazhaki</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Mathematics, Madurai Kamaraj University Constitutional College, Madurai, India</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Mathematics, E.M.G. Yadava Women’s College, Madurai, India</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>rain.preethi90@gmail.com(KPTP)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>04</day><month>07</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>07</issue><fpage>493</fpage><lpage>513</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>April</day>	<month>19,</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>9,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>July</day>	<month>12,</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  A mathematical modelling of diagnostic biosensors system at three basic types of enzyme kinetics is discussed in the presence of diffusion. Enzyme kinetics is adopted to be first order, Michaelis-Menten and ping-pong mechanism. In this paper, approximate analytical solutions are obtained for the non-linear equations under steady-state conditions by using the new Homotopy perturbation method. Simple and closed forms of analytical expressions for concentrations of substrate, product and co-substrate and corresponding current response have been derived for all possible values of parameters. Furthermore, the numerical simulation of the problem is also reported here by using Matlab program. Good agreement between analytical and numerical results is noted.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Diagnostic Biosensor</kwd><kwd> Bio Fuel</kwd><kwd> Enzyme</kwd><kwd> Kinetic</kwd><kwd> Non Linear Equations</kwd><kwd> Reaction/Diffusion Equation</kwd><kwd> Homotopy Perturbation Method</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>A biosensor is an analytical device used for the detection of an analyte that combines a biological component with a physicochemical detector [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77574-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77574-ref2">2</xref>] . The earlier biosensors were catalytic systems that integrated especially enzymes with transducers that converted the biological response into an electronic signal. The next generation of biosensors, took advantage of different biological elements, such as antibodies, receptors (natural or synthetic), or nucleic acids [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77574-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77574-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>Biosensors for environmental application include the detection of harmful bacteria or pesticides in air, water, or food. New technologies are likely to encompass all-printed systems capitalising on the printed electronics revolution and systems with high compatibility with future mobile technology such as tablets and 4G phones [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77574-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>Rangelova et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77574-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77574-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77574-ref8">8</xref>] described the models in biosensors and investigated the influence of the diffusion and kinetic parameters on the response of the biosensor. Tothil et al., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77574-ref9">9</xref>] deals with the recent developments in biosensors and their potential use in the agricultural diagnostic market. Mishra et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77574-ref10">10</xref>] reviewed various cancer biomarkers in saliva and compared the biomarkers efficacy with traditional diagnostics and state-of-the-art bioelectronics. Cortina et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77574-ref11">11</xref>] presented the development and validation of a portable, robust and inexpensive electrochemical magnetic biosensor.</p><p>Lawal et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77574-ref12">12</xref>] summarized the fabrication of carbon nanotubes-based electrochemical biosensors. They also discussed the synthesis, along with the application of carbon nanotubes to the assembly of carbon nanotube-based electrochemical sensors, its analytical performance and future expectations. Recently Gruhl et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77574-ref13">13</xref>] described the latest applications of biosensors in diagnostic applications. In this paper the current state and future trends of biosensors are presented. Also Mascini et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77574-ref3">3</xref>] reviewed the application of biosensor sin medical diagnostics, taking into account several crucial features.</p><p>The numerical method of solving the system of partial differential equations is to make calculation at all intervals of substrates concentration and at different diffusion and enzymatic reaction rates. The diffusion equations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77574-ref14">14</xref>] , containing a nonlinear term related to the enzymatic reaction, are carried out using the implicit difference scheme [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77574-ref15">15</xref>] . In recent years, analytical solutions are reported for various types of biosensors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77574-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77574-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77574-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77574-ref19">19</xref>] . The analytical results of diagnostic biosensor are relevant because their solutions describe important applications such as bioreactors and biofuel cells, among others [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77574-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77574-ref21">21</xref>] .</p><p>To the researcher’s knowledge no rigorous analytical solution of substrate concentration product with concentration profiles co-substrate concentration and corresponding current response has been derived for all possible values of parameters under steady-state conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77574-ref22">22</xref>] . The purpose of this communication is to derive approximate analytical expressions for the steady-state concentrations and current over the diagnostic of biosensor transducers for first order, Michaelis-Menten and ping-pong kinetics using Homotopy perturbation method.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Mathematical Description of the Boundary Value Problem</title><p>Only biosensors systems will be investigated in the active membrane, because it is known that the concentrations of substrate<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, Product <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and co-substrate <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in other two membranes are changed linearly. Biosensors are function under diffusion control. It is assumed that the electrode has symmetrical geometry and the enzyme is homogeneously distributed in the active membrane. The diffusion is one dimensional in space and is described with the second Fick’s law. The two parameters diagnostic biosensor transducers are based on oxygen electrode. The steady-state reaction-diffusion equation for biosensor systems in the dynamic mode has the following form [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77574-ref22">22</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula31"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x5.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The non-dimensional coordinates, variables and parameters are as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula32"><label>(1a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are diffusion coefficients for substrate, co-substrate and product. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>denotes the reaction constant for concentration profiles (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>), respectively. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the enzyme rate and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> represents the coordinate distance. The diagnosis of the biosensor system depends on the enzyme kinetics and the enzyme reaction as well as on the basic transducer. The kinetics is distinguished in to three kinds:</p><p>First order kinetic:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula33"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x12.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Michaelis-Menten kinetic:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula34"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x13.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Two substrateping-pong kinetic:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula35"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x14.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The three types of biosensors can be described with the following system of differential equations:</p><p>Equations (5)-(13) are subjected to the following boundary conditions:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula36"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x24.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula37"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x25.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> represents the thickness of active membrane, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the Thiele Module, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is diffusion coefficient of product, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the diffusion coefficient of co-substrate and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is reaction rate constant for co-substrate. The initial current of the biosensor system is recorded normally in substrate, product and co-substrate concentrations at the electrode and are as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula38"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x31.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula39"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x32.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula40"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x33.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the number of electrons taking part in electrochemical reaction, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the Faraday’s number, and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the area of the electrode surface [m<sup>2</sup>].</p>Analytical Solutions of Concentrations of Substrate, Product and Co-Substrate under Steady-State Condition Using the New Homotopy Perturbation Method<p>Recently, many authors have applied the HPM to solve the various non-linear problem in engineering sciences [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77574-ref23">23</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.77574-ref28">28</xref>] . This method is a combination of Homotopy in topology and classic perturbation techniques. The HPM has uniqueness in its applicability, accuracy, and efficiency. Recently, a new approach of HPM with zeroth iteration has been applied to solve the nonlinear problem. In this work, a new approach to Homotopy perturbation method is used (Appen- dix A and Appendix B) to solve the nonlinear differential Equations (5)-(13). Using this method, the analytical expression of the concentration of substrate<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, Product <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and co-substrate <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> can be obtained as follows:</p><p>The first order kinetic Equations (18)-(20) represent the simple and closed form of analytical expressions of concentrations of substrate, product and co- substrate for all possible values of the parameters. By using Equations (5)-(7) with boundary conditions (14), the following relation is also obtained:</p><p>First order kinetic</p><p>The Michaelis?Menten kinetic Equations (24)-(26) represent the simple and closed form of analytical expressions of concentrations of substrate, product and co-substrate for all possible values of the parameters. By using Equations (8)-(10) with boundary conditions (14), the following relation is also obtained:</p><p>Michaelis-Menten kinetic:</p><p>The Ping pong kinetic: Equations (30)-(32) represent the simple and closed forms of analytical expressions of concentrations of substrate, product and co- substrate for all possible values of the parameters. By using Equations (11)-(13) with boundary conditions (14), the following relation is also obtained:</p><p>Ping pong kinetic:</p><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Numerical Simulation</title><p>The system of non-linear differential Equations (5)-(13) with boundary conditions (14) have been solved numerically using MATLAB software. A MATLAB script pdex4 is provided in Appendix C. In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>, Tables 1-3 the numerical solutions are compared with the analytical results. The maximum average relative error between our analytical and numerical result is 0.94% for first order kinetic, 0.91% for Michaelis?Menten kinetic and 1.54% for Ping pong kinetic.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results and Discussion</title><p>The dinensonless non-linear differential equations are solved using a new Homotopy perturbation method. Equations (18)-(20), (24)-(26) and (30)-(32) re- present the analytical expression of the concentrations of substrate, product and co-substrate for various values of Thiele modulus <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and the dimensionless parameters for first order, Michalies-Menten and Ping-Pong kinetics respectively. The analytical results are compared with the numerical results.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison of dimensionless concentrations <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (Equations (18)-(20)) and numerical simulation for first order kinetics when fixed value of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Substrate</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Product</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Co-substrate</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >This Work Equation (18)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Numerical soln</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >% of Error</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >This Work Equation (19)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Numerical soln</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >% of Error</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >This Work Equation (20)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Numerical soln</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >% of Error</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9512</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9530</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2383</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7760</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7748</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9139</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9133</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3600</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3685</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5640</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5631</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8875</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8859</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3600</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3565</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3640</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3617</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8719</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8715</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2419</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1760</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1751</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.51</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8667</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8667</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Average % error</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Average % error</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Average % error</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.29</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison of dimensionless concentrations <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (Equation (24)-(26)) and numerical simulation for Michaelis-Menten kinetics when fixed value of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Substrate</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Product</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Co-substrate</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >This Work Equation (24)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Numerical soln</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >% of Error</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >This Work Equation (25)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Numerical soln</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >% of Error</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >This Work Equation (26)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Numerical soln</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >% of Error</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9730</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9700</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.600</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5911</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7880</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7967</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9520</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9513</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.900</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8999</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5820</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5886</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9370</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9380</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.900</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8997</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3820</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3865</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9280</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9300</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.600</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6081</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1880</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1903</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9250</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9273</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Average % error</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Average % error</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Average % error</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.91</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison of dimensionless concentrations <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (Equations (30)-(32)) and numerical simulation for ping pong kinetics when fixed value of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Substrate</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Product</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Co-substrate</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >This Work Equation (30)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Numerical soln</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >% of Error</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >This Work Equation (31)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Numerical soln</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >% of Error</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >This Work Equation (32)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Numerical soln</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >% of Error</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9940</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9965</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0266</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0213</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7733</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7799</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.84</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9893</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9937</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0389</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5600</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5676</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9860</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9922</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0399</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0393</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3600</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3673</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.98</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9840</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9916</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0266</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0259</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1733</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1760</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.53</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9833</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9899</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Average % error</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Average % error</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Average % error</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.14</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Figures 1-3 show the plots of all the concentrations versus dimensionless distance <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for various values of parameters. For<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, biosensors act in diffusion regime, and for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the biosensors act in rule of limiting kinetic. Reaction rate constant for substrate <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is dependable from enzyme concentration and characterized enzyme. There are different enzymes for various tissues, where as reaction rate constant is permanent for the given tissue. The strong affinity between enzyme and substrate shows low value of kinetics and poor affinity shows high value.</p><p>The substrate concentration <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> approaches unity at<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The substrate concentration increases with decreasing Thiele module. When the ratio of diffusion coefficient<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> increases, the Thiele module increases the product. The concentration of co-substrate increases, when Thiele module decreases. If the ratio of diffusion coefficient <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and ratio of reaction rate constant <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> increases, the concentration of co-substrate decreases.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> focuses the concentration on the first-order kinetics, Michaelis- Menten kinetics, and ping-pong kinetic mechanism of the substrate<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x80.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, product <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x80.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x81.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and co-substrate <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x80.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x81.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x82.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for particular values of parameters. The analytical results are compared with the numerical results as given in Tables 1-3 for fixed values of parameters and satisfactory agreement is noted. In all the cases, the average relative error is less than 1.54%.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> represents the concentration of the substrate, product and co-sub- strate vursus distance for the first-order kinetics, Michaelis?Menten kinetics, and ping-pong kinetic mechanism for particular values of parameters. From this figure, it is inferred that the concentration of the ping-pong kinetics largely corresponds to the other two mechanisms. But for the co substrate, the concentration does not show much difference. From these Figure, it is concluded that the dimensionless concentration of substrate and co-substrateis greater for the Ping-Pong than the first order and M-M kinetics.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> represent the dimensionless current profiles of product and co-substrate for various values of dimensionless parameters. The current depends on the product and co-substrate gradient at the electrode surface. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x83.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>has no influenced over biosensor response, but <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x83.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x83.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x85.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> has been increasing the value of the diffusion constant <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x83.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x85.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x83.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x85.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> leads to small values of response time.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>In this work, a mathematical model that describes the steady-state response of a two parameters diagnostic of biosensor is discussed. Anew Homotopy perturbation method is employed to solve the system of steady-state non-linear differential equations for three types of kinetics. Analytical expressions corresponding to substrate, product and co-substrate concentrations are derived as the function of dimensionless parameters. For all different concentrations, the analytical results match well with the simulated results. The analytical results provided in this work are useful to understand the behaviour of the system. The extension</p><fig-group id="fig1"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> (a)-(f) Plot of dimensionless concentrations of the substrate<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, product <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and co-substrate <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> versus dimensionless distance x of the first-order kinetics are calculated using Equations (18), (19) and (20), respectively for different values of the Thiele modulus<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, Diffusion coefficient of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, Reaction rate constant for co-substrate<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and Diffusion coefficient of co-substrate<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x100.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</title></caption><fig id ="fig1_1"><label> (b)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x89.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig1_2"><label>(c)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x88.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig1_3"><label> (d)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x90.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig1_4"><label>(e)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x91.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig1_5"><label> (f)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x92.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig1_6"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x93.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig-group id="fig2"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Plot of dimensionless concentrations of the substrate<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, product <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x108.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and co-substrate <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x108.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> versus dimensionless distance x of the Michalies menten kinetics are calculated using Equations (24), (25) and (26), respectively for different values of the Thiele modulus<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x108.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, Diffusion coefficient of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x108.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, Reaction rate constant for co-substrate<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x108.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and Diffusion coefficient of co-substrate<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x108.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x113.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</title></caption><fig id ="fig2_1"><label> (b)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x101.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig2_2"><label>(c)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x102.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig2_3"><label> (d)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x103.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig2_4"><label>(e)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x104.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig2_5"><label> (f)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x105.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig2_6"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x106.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig-group id="fig3"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> (a)-(f) Plot of dimensionless concentrations of the substrate<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, product <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and co-substrate <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> versus dimensionless distance x of the Michalies menten kinetics are calculated using Equations (30), (31) and (32),respectively for different values of the Thiele modulus<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x123.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, Diffusion coefficient of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x123.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x124.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, Reaction rate constant for co-substrate<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x123.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x124.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x125.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and Diffusion coefficient of co-substrate<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x123.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x124.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x125.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x126.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</title></caption><fig id ="fig3_1"><label> (b)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x114.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig3_2"><label>(c)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x115.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig3_3"><label> (d)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x116.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig3_4"><label>(e)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x117.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig3_5"><label> (f)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x118.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig3_6"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x119.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig-group id="fig4"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Concentration of substrate<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x130.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, Product <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x130.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x131.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and co-substrate <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x130.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x131.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x132.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> versus dimensionless distance x of first order, Michalies-Menten and ping-pong kineticare represented using Equations (18)-(20) for substrate and Equations (24)-(26) for product and Equations (30)-(32) for co-substrate, respectively for some fixed values of parameters.</title></caption><fig id ="fig4_1"><label>(b)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x127.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_2"><label>(c)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x128.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_3"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x129.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig-group id="fig5"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Concentration of substrate<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x136.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, Product <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x136.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x137.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and co-substrate <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x136.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x137.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x138.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> versus dimensionless distance x of first order, Michalies-Menten and ping-pong kinetic are represented using Equations (18), (24) and (30) for substrate and Equations (19), (25) and (31) for product and Equations (20), (26) and (32) for co-substrate, respectively for some fixed values of parameters.</title></caption><fig id ="fig5_1"><label>(b)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x133.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig5_2"><label>(c)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x134.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig5_3"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x135.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig-group id="fig6"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Generalised graph of the dimensionless current for product <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x142.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> versus Thiele module <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x142.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x143.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of first order, Michalies-Menten and ping-pong kineticare represented using Equations (22), (28) and (34), respectively for some fixed values of parameters.</title></caption><fig id ="fig6_1"><label>(b)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x139.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig6_2"><label>(c)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x140.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig6_3"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x141.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig-group id="fig7"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> Generalised graph of the dimensionless current for co-substrate product <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x147.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> versus Thiele module <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x147.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x148.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of first order, Michalies-Menten and ping-pong kineticare represented using Equations (23), (29) and (34), respectively for some fixed values of parameters.</title></caption><fig id ="fig7_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x144.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig7_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x145.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig7_3"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x146.png"/></fig></fig-group><p>of the procedure to other systems nonlinear equation in various type of biosensor seems to be possible.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Preethi, K.P.T., Meena, V. and Poovazhaki, R. (2017) Reliable Method for Steady-State Concentrations and Current over the Diagnostic Bio- sensor Transducers. American Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 8, 493-513. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajac.2017.87036</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Appendix A</title><p>Approximate analytical solutions for Equations (8)-(10) (Michaelis-Men- ten kinetic) using HPM:</p><p>In order to solve Equation (8-10) by means of the new HPM, first the Zeroth order deformation equation is constructed.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula41"><label>(A1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x149.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula42"><label>(A2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x150.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula43"><label>(A3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x151.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The approximate solutions of Equations (A1), (A2) and (A3) are as follows</p><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula44"><label>(A4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x152.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting (A4) in Equation (A1) and equating the like powers of p, we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula45"><label>(A5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x153.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula46"><label>(A6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x154.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting (A4) in Equation (A2) and equating the like powers of p, we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula47"><label>(A7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x155.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula48"><label>(A8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x156.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting (A4) in Equation (A3) and equating the like powers of p, we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula49"><label>(A9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x157.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula50"><label>(A10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x158.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The boundary conditions in Equation (14) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula51"><label>(A11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x159.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula52"><label>(A12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x160.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Now by applying the boundary conditions (A11) in (A5), (A7) and (A9), we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula53"><label>(A13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x161.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula54"><label>(A14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x162.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula55"><label>(A15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x163.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting the values of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x164.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x164.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x165.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in Equation (A6), (A8) and (A10), and respectively by solving the equations using the boundary conditions (A12), the following results are obtained:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula56"><label>(A16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x166.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula57"><label>(A17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x167.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula58"><label>(A18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x168.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Adding Equations (A13) and (A16), we get Equation (24) in the text. Similarly, Equation (25) and Equation (26) are got in the text.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Appendix B</title><p>Approximate analytical solutions for Equations (11-13) (ping-pong kinetic) using HPM:</p><p>In order to solve Equations (11-13) by means of the new HPM, first the Zeroth order deformation equation is constructed.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula59"><label>(B1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x169.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula60"><label>(B2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x170.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula61"><label>(B3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x171.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The approximate solutions of Equations (B1), (B2) and (B3) are as follows</p><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula62"><label>(B4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x172.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting (B4) in Equations (B1) and equating the like powers of p, we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula63"><label>(B5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x173.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula64"><label>(B6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x174.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting (B4) in Equation (B2) and equating the like powers of p, we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula65"><label>(B7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x175.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula66"><label>(B8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x176.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting (B4) in Equation (B3) and equating the like powers of p, we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula67"><label>(B9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x177.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula68"><label>(B10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x178.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The boundary conditions in Equation (14) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula69"><label>(B11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x179.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula70"><label>(B12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x180.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Now by applying the boundary conditions (B11) in (B5), (B7) and (B9), we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula71"><label>(B13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x181.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula72"><label>(B14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x182.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula73"><label>(B15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x183.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting the values of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x184.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x184.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x185.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in Equation (B6), (B8) and (B10), and solving the equations using the boundary conditions (B12), the following results are obtained:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula74"><label>(B16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x186.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula75"><label>(B17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x187.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.77574-formula76"><label>(B18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x188.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Adding Equations (B13) and (B16), we get Equation (30) in the text. Similarly, Equation (31) and Equation (32) are got in the text.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Appendix C</title><p>Scilab/Matlab program for the numerical solution of the system of non- linear Equations (5-13).</p><p>function pdex4</p><p>m = 0;</p><p>x = linspace(0,1);</p><p>t=linspace(0,100000);</p><p>sol = pdepe(m,@pdex4pde,@pdex4ic,@pdex4bc,x,t);</p><p>u1 = sol(:,:,1);</p><p>u2 = sol(:,:,2);</p><p>u3 = sol(:,:,3);</p><p>figure</p><p>plot(x,u1(end,:))</p><p>title('u1(x,t)')</p><p>xlabel('Distance x')</p><p>ylabel('u1(x,2)')</p><p>%------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p>figure</p><p>plot(x,u2(end,:))</p><p>title('u2(x,t)')</p><p>xlabel('Distance x')</p><p>ylabel('u2(x,2)')</p><p>% --------------------------------------------------------------</p><p>figure</p><p>plot(x,u3(end,:))</p><p>title('u3(x,t)')</p><p>xlabel('Distance x')</p><p>ylabel('u3(x,2)')</p><p>%--------------------------------------------------------------</p><p>function [c,f,s] = pdex4pde(x,t,u,DuDx)</p><p>c = [1; 1; 1];</p><p>f = [1; 1; 1] .* DuDx;</p><p>l=0.1;mu=0.5;q=1;p=5;</p><p>F=-q^2*u(1);</p><p>F1=l*q^2*u(1);</p><p>F2=-mu*p*q^2*u(1);</p><p>s=[F; F1; F2];</p><p>% --------------------------------------------------------------</p><p>function u0 = pdex4ic(x);</p><p>u0 = [1; 1; 1];</p><p>% --------------------------------------------------------------</p><p>function [pl,ql,pr,qr]=pdex4bc(xl,ul,xr,ur,t)</p><p>pl = [ul(1)-1;ul(2)-0;ul(3)-1];</p><p>ql = [0; 0; 0];</p><p>pr = [0; ur(2)-0;ur(3)-0];</p><p>qr = [1;0; 0];</p></sec><sec id="s10"><title>Nomenclature</title><p>Symbol</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x189.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>Dimensionless parameters</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x190.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>Concentration of substrate (mmol)</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x191.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>Concentration of substrate (mmol)</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x192.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>Concentration of substrate (mmol)</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x193.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>Dimensionless concentration of substrate (mmol)</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x194.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>Dimensionless concentration of product (mmol)</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x195.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>Dimensionless concentration of co-substrate (mmol)</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x196.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>Initial concentration of substrate (mmol)</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x197.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>Initial concentration of product (mmol)</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x198.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>Initial concentration of co-substrate (mmol)</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x199.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>Reaction rate constant (mmol)</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x200.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>Diffusion coefficient (m<sup>2</sup>/s)</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x201.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>Enzymatic rate (mmol/s)</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x202.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>Output current</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x203.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>Number of electrons</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x204.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>Faraday’s number (C/mol)</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x205.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>Area of the electrode surface (m<sup>2</sup>)</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x206.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>Dimensionless distance</p><p>Greek symbols</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x207.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>Diffusion coefficient of substrate and product (Dimensionless)</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x208.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>Diffusion coefficient of substrate and co-substrate (Dimensionless)</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x209.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>Reaction rate constant for substrate and co-substrate (Dimensionless)</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x210.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>Thiele Module (Dimensionless)</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x211.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>dimension distance (m)</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x212.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>Current (Dimensionless)</p><p>Subscripts <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x213.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x214.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>Substrate</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x215.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>Product</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-2201572x216.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>Co-Substrate</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.77574-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thevenot, D.R., Toth, K., Durst, R.A. and Wilson, G.S. (2001) Electrochemical Biosensors: Recommended Definitions and Classification. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 16, 121-131.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77574-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Newman, J.D., Tigwell, L.J., Turner, A.P.F. and Warner, P.J. (2004) Biosensors—A Clearer View. Cranfield University Publication.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77574-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mascini, M. and Tombelli, S. (2008) Biosensors for Biomarkers in Medical Diagnostics. Biomarkers, 13, 637-657. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547500802645905</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77574-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, Y., Yang, D., Weng, L. and Wang, L. (2013) Early Lung Cancer Diagnosis by Biosensors. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 14, 15479-15509. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms140815479</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77574-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Turner</surname><given-names> A.P. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2013</year>)<article-title>Biosensors: Sense and Sensibility</article-title><source> Chemical Society Review</source><volume> 42</volume>,<fpage> 3184</fpage>-<lpage>3196</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77574-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rangelova, V., Katsarova, P. and Iliev, K.J. (2007) Influence of Parameters over Biosensors Response in Dynamic Mode at Different Enzyme Kinetic. Annals of the Faculty of Engineering Hunedoara—Journal of Engineering, 5, 105-112.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77574-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Rangelova</surname><given-names> V. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2006</year>)<article-title>Modeling Amperometric Biosensor with Cyclic Reaction</article-title><source> Annals of the Faculty of Engineering Hunedoara—Journal of Engineering</source><volume> 5</volume>,<fpage> 116</fpage>-<lpage>122</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77574-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rangelova, V., Pandelova, A. and Stoiyanov, N. (2011) Inhibitor Multienzyme Biosensor System in Dynamic Mode—Phosphate Measurement. Annals of the Faculty of Engineering Hunedoara—Journal of Engineering, 9, 83-86.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77574-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tothill</surname><given-names> I.E. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2001</year>)<article-title>Biosensors Developments and Potential Applications in the Agricultural Diagnosis Sector</article-title><source> Computers and Electronics in Agriculture</source><volume> 30</volume>,<fpage> 205</fpage>-<lpage>218</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77574-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mishra, S., Saadat, D., Kwon, O., Lee, Y., Choi, W.S., Kim, J.H. and Yeo, W.H. (2016) Recent Advances in Salivary Cancer Diagnostics Enabled by Biosensors and Bioelectronics. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 81, 181-197.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77574-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cortina, M.E., Melli, L.J., Roberti, M., Mass, M., Longinotti, G., Tropea, S., Lloret, P., Serantes, D.A.R., Salomón, F., Lloret, M., Caillava, A.J., Restuccia, S., Altcheh, J., Buscaglia, C.A., Malatto, L., Ugalde, J.E., Fraigi, L., Moina, C., Ybarra, G., Ciocchini, A.E. and Comerci, D.J. (2016) Electrochemical Magnetic Microbeads-Based Biosensor for Point-of-Care Sero-Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 80, 24-33.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77574-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lawal</surname><given-names> A.T. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2016</year>)<article-title>Synthesis and Utilization of Carbon Nanotubes for Fabrication of Electrochemical Biosensors</article-title><source> Materials Research Bulletin</source><volume> 73</volume>,<fpage> 308</fpage>-<lpage>350</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77574-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Gruhl, F.J., Rapp, B.E. and Lange, K. (2013) Biosensors for Diagnostic Applications. In: Seitz, H. and Schumacher, S., Eds., Molecular Diagnostics. Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology, Vol. 133, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 115-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/10_2011_130</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77574-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baronas, R., Ivanauskas, F. and Kulys, J. (1999) Modelling a Biosensor Based on the Heterogeneous Microreactor. Journal of Mathematical Chemistry, 25, 245-252.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019192618843</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77574-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ames, W.F. (1977) Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations. 2nd Edition, Academic Press, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77574-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Meena, A. and Rajendran, L. (2010) Mathematicalmodeling of Amperometric and Potentiometric Biosensors and System of Nonlinear Equations—Homotopy Perturbation Approach. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 644, 50-59.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77574-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Loghambal, S. and Rajendran, L. (2011) Mathematical Modeling in Amperometric Oxidase Enzyme-Membrane Electrodes. Journal of Membrane Science, 373, 20-28.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77574-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Manimozhi, P., Subbiah, A. and Rajendran, L. (2010) Solution of Steady-State Substrate Concentration in the Action of Biosensor Response at Mixed Enzyme Kinetics. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 147, 290-297.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77574-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Venugopal, K., Eswari, A. and Rajendran, L. (2011) Mathematical Model for Steady State Current at PPO-Modified Micro-Cylinder Biosensors. Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering, 4, 631-641. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbise.2011.49079</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77574-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kirthiga, O.M. and Rajendran, L. (2015) Approximate Analytical Solution for Non-Linear Reaction Diffusion Equations in a Mono-Enzymatic Biosensor Involving Michaelis-Menten Kinetics. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 751, 119-127.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77574-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saravanakumara, K., Rajendrana, L. and Sangaranarayananb, M.V. (2015) Current-Potential Response and Concentration Profiles of Redoxpolymer-Mediated Enzyme Catalysis in Biofuel Cells—Estimation of Michaelis-Menten Constants. Chemical Physics Letters, 621, 117-123.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77574-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Katzarova, P., Rangelova, V. and Kuneva, S. (2006) Two Parameters Diagnostic of Biosensor Transducers. Biotechnology &amp; Biotechnological Equipment, 20, 190-194.https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2006.10817331</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77574-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ozis, T. and Yildirim, A. (2007) A Comparative Study of He’s Homotopy Perturbation Method for Determining Frequency-Amplitude Relation of a Nonlinear Oscillator with Discontinuities. International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation, 8, 243-248. https://doi.org/10.1515/IJNSNS.2007.8.2.243</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77574-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mousa, M.M. and Ragab, S.F. (2008) Application of the Homotopy Perturbation Method to Linear and Nonlinear Schrodinger Equations. Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung, 63, 140-144.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77574-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>He</surname><given-names> J.H. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1999</year>)<article-title>Homotopy Perturbation Technique</article-title><source> Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering</source><volume> 178</volume>,<fpage> 257</fpage>-<lpage>262</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77574-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rajendran, L. and Anitha, S. (2013) Reply to “Comments on Analytical Solution of Amperometric Enzymatic Reactions Based on HPM”. Electrochimica Acta, 102, 474-476.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77574-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Meena, V., Indira, K., Kumar, S. and Rajendran, L. (2014) A New Mathematical Model for Effectiveness Factors in Biofilm under Toxic Conditions. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 53, 917-928.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.77574-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Meena, A. and Rajendran, L. (2010) Mathematical Modeling of Amperometric and Potentiometric Biosensors and System of Nonlinear Equations—Homotopy Perturbation Approach. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 644, 50-59.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>